with all due respect to the english and their nation, but the troubles they are having are due to mere arrogance and dare I say hint of racism. How can you select Stoneman, Malan and Bess? Based on what????
England missed a trick by never giving Adil Rashid a good run in the test arena and scapegoating him when they expected him to take 10fers in the subcontinent against teams who play spin very well. Adil Rashid would've have been your perfect number 8 and knows his own conditions at home very well. As a result, you've pushed the guy away forcing him to turn his attention to white ball cricket where 1) he will earn more money 2) gets the respect.
Moeen Ali has time and time again saved England in the past few years with both his batting and bowling. He could EASILY fit into that number 4/5 slot instead of Malan. He scored 2 100's in India playing that position and also gives you the option of a spinner. He doesnt take wickets in australia and you drop him? No overseas spinner including murali has EVER had great success in australia and england are expecting Moeen Ali to lead their attack.
And the final disgrace is scapegoating Haseeb Hameed who also has tremendous potential and although he struggled last year in the domestic county championship, England should've consistently worked with him and given him opportunities knowing that he will one day replace Alaistair Cook. Cook in 2006 had an awful Ashes series in the down under yet the ECB stuck with him. Haseeb deserves the same
In summary:
Hameed -> Stoneman
Ali -> Malan
Rashid -> Bess
(woakes -> wood)
and this english team would murder anyone that visits them at home. But we know that'll never happen. How could the ECB be content with 14 people out 22 players being brown on home soil?
Just my 2 cents. People can disagree all they want.