‘PM Modi hid facts about Pulwama attack for political benefit’: IOK’s ex-governor Satya Pal

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,479
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/b8wmHUhLvOI" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

NEW DELHI: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hid key facts from the public about the Pulwama terror attack that killed dozens of paramilitary troops in India-held Jammu and Kashmir in February 2019, a former governor of the disputed region has said.

Satya Pal Malik also told The Wire in an interview that he immediately realised that Mr Modi wanted to use the attack to blame ******tan for the benefit of his government and the BJP.

In a wide-ranging interview with Karan Thapar, published on Friday, Mr Malik also slammed corruption under Mr Modi’s watch. “I can safely say the PM has no real problem with corruption,” he said.


Mr Malik was governor during the Pulwama atta*ck and the scrapping of Article 370 in August that year. He said the Indian prime minister was “ill-informed” and “ignorant” about Kashmir, and that he had told Mr Malik not to speak about the home ministry’s lapses, which led to the devastating incident.

Mr Malik revealed that the attack on the Central Reserve Police Force convoy in Pulwama was a result of “incompetence” and “carelessness” by the Indian system, specifically the CRPF and the home min*i**stry.

Mr Malik gave details of how the CRPF had asked for aircraft to transport its personnel, but was refused by the home ministry.

More importantly, he said all of these lapses were raised by him directly when Mr Modi called him from outside Corbett Park, shortly after the Pulwama attack. He said the prime minister told him to keep quiet about this and not tell anyone.

Separately, Mr Malik said that National Security Adviser Ajit Doval also told him to keep quiet and not talk about it. Mr Malik said he immediately realised that the intention was to put the blame on Pakistan and derive electoral benefit for the government and BJP.

Mr Malik also said that there was grave intelligence failure in the Pulwama incident, because the car carrying 300 kilograms of RDX explosives had allegedly come from across the border, but was travelling around the roads and villages of India-held Jammu and Kashmir for 10-15 days without being detected and without anyone knowing.

Mr Malik also detailed why he did not let Mehbooba Mufti form a new government, even though she claimed a majo*rity of 56 in the 87-member assembly and why he chose instead to dissolve the assembly in November 2018. At one point, he accused Mehbooba Mufti of lying, saying that the parties whose support she was claiming, such as the National Conference, were separately telling him to dissolve the assembly because they feared horse-trading.

Mr Malik said the prime minister is “ignorant” and “ill-informed” about Kashmir. He said that removing India-held Kashmir’s statehood was a mistake and it should be restored immediately.

Speaking about Mr Modi, Mr Malik said the prime minister is not at all concerned about corruption.

He said he was removed as governor of Goa in August 2020 and sent to Meghalaya because he had brought to the prime minister’s attention several instances of corruption, which the government chose to ignore rather than tackle.

He alleged that the people around the prime minister are indulging in corruption and often use the PMO’s name. Mr Malik said he had brought all this to Mr Modi’s attention, but added that the PM did not seem to care.

Published in Dawn, April 15th, 2023
 
In before sanghies try to defend Modi and ask Mr. Malik to move to Pakistsn.
 
In before sanghis roll in telling us Malik will be judged by impartial Indian courts and found guilty of lying under oath and besmirching the reputation of the country.
 
We already knew that the attack on PK was based on lies by the fascist. Hopefully Inds eyes are opened
 
Been saying this since day 1, Pulwama aas a failure on the Indian armed forces part. Nothing to do with Pakistan. Possibly even an inside job
 
Been saying this since day 1, Pulwama aas a failure on the Indian armed forces part. Nothing to do with Pakistan. Possibly even an inside job

All terror attacks are related to some intelligence or security failure. All
 
But that doesn't mean it was not a terrorist attack and it was planned funded executed by a terrorist organisation based in Pakistan.

And the chest thumping of PTI minister in pakistani assembly just proved it.
 
Great you acknowledged that. Ultimately it means the aggressive reaction by India against Pakistan was unwarranted

It was very much warranted.

Why do you think nations retaliate to a terror attack, its planners perpetrators financiers?

Jaish e Mohammad a Pakistan based organisation planned financed and executed the attack.
 
All terror attacks are related to some intelligence or security failure. All

Civilians were killed?

Occupied people have a right to self defence against occupiers who oppress, rape, murder them.

Modi of course used this to attack Pakistan and we all know how that ended.
 
But that doesn't mean it was not a terrorist attack and it was planned funded executed by a terrorist organisation based in Pakistan.

And the chest thumping of PTI minister in pakistani assembly just proved it.

It was an inside job. They were looking for anything to create the narrative and his reaction to the governor showed he is a criminal.
 
It was very much warranted.

Why do you think nations retaliate to a terror attack, its planners perpetrators financiers?

Jaish e Mohammad a Pakistan based organisation planned financed and executed the attack.

Without any proof? The way Modi hushed this governor is evidence that he was looking for an electoral platform against Pakistan. Wanted to show a strong and mighty India that can take the fight to Pakistan
 
Without any proof? The way Modi hushed this governor is evidence that he was looking for an electoral platform against Pakistan. Wanted to show a strong and mighty India that can take the fight to Pakistan

You need to read statements issued by US UK UN and others. They all issued statements blaming a Pakistani terrorist organisation. They are not fools.

Modi doesn't need to show anything against Pakistan. Indians already know it since decades.

This governor was fired. Now he is looking for another alternative political domain.

PM of India calls him from a Dhaba. Right. :))
 
It was an inside job. They were looking for anything to create the narrative and his reaction to the governor showed he is a criminal.

Inside job? So all those countries and UN who issued statements must be idiots.

There is no need for any new narrative. The narrative is known since 1947.
 
You need to read statements issued by US UK UN and others. They all issued statements blaming a Pakistani terrorist organisation. They are not fools.

Modi doesn't need to show anything against Pakistan. Indians already know it since decades.

This governor was fired. Now he is looking for another alternative political domain.

PM of India calls him from a Dhaba. Right. :))


Simply don't need to, it was India's internal affair. What others say is irrelevant. We responded befittingly to your aggression and will continue to do so whenever India tries another misadventure.
 
Simply don't need to, it was India's internal affair. What others say is irrelevant. We responded befittingly to your aggression and will continue to do so whenever India tries another misadventure.

Other countries saw the evidence. Most likely had their own intelligence inputs and issued statements.

India will continue to respond with disproportionate conventional force to any provocation from Pakistan and will not allow Pakistan to hide behind low cost terrorist organisations.

Let's see how much economic and military cost pakistan is willing to pay.
 
Sensational Indian journalism at it's best, this is no proof. Please listen to the whole thing and how he particularly mentions 'Ghus ke mara hai' after the Pulwama incident. And he's right. It was a matter of pride for the whole Nation after India flew jets in our territory which is an act of war. We had to respond even if it meant going into India to strike.

Pulwama mein kamyabi hai. Wo awaam ki kamyabi hai.

Stop trying to cover.

The world knew and accepted the fact that pakistani organisation was involved in the attack.
 
Other countries saw the evidence. Most likely had their own intelligence inputs and issued statements.

India will continue to respond with disproportionate conventional force to any provocation from Pakistan and will not allow Pakistan to hide behind low cost terrorist organisations.

Let's see how much economic and military cost pakistan is willing to pay.

Ok again no proof from your side just opinions.

As for Pakistan economically and military, we are a very dheet qoam. India has been trying hard to isolate us but the whole World is supporting us economically not to default. Pakistan isn't going anywhere and will always be ready to respond.
 
Sensational Indian journalism at it's best, this is no proof. Please listen to the whole thing and how he particularly mentions 'Ghus ke mara hai' after the Pulwama incident. And he's right. It was a matter of pride for the whole Nation after India flew jets in our territory which is an act of war. We had to respond even if it meant going into India to strike.


Read it again.

Pakistan Minister admits Islamabad’s role in Pulwama terror attack


In a sensational admission, a senior Pakistani Minister on Thursday admitted that Pakistan was responsible for the Pulwama terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir in 2019 that killed 40 CRPF personnel and brought the two countries to the brink of a war.

“ Humne Hindustan ko ghus ke maara (We hit India in their home). Our success in Pulwama, is a success of this nation under the leadership of Imran Khan. You and us are all part of that success,” Science & Technology Minister Fawad Chaudhry said in the National Assembly during a debate.


https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/pakistan-minister-admits-islamabads-role-in-pulwama-terror-attack/article32973658.ece


New Delhi: Pakistan was responsible for the terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pulwama last year in which 40 Indian paramilitary troopers were killed, a Pakistani minister has told the country's legislature, in an apparent admission of the country's role in sponsoring cross-border terrorism.
"Humne Hindustan ko ghus ke maara (We hit India in their home). Our success in Pulwama, is a success of the people under the leadership of Imran Khan. You and we are all part of that success," minister Fawad Chaudhury said in the national assembly.

As the statement sparked an uproar in the assembly, he appeared to change tack, rephrasing his line as: "Pulwama ke waqiyeh ke baad, jab humne India ko ghus ke maara (When we hit India in their home after the incident at Pulwama)".

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/india-ko-ghus-ke-maara-pakistan-minister-fawad-chaudhury-owns-pulwama-attack-2317611
 
Inside job? So all those countries and UN who issued statements must be idiots.

There is no need for any new narrative. The narrative is known since 1947.

Who benefitted from this apparent attack? Who used the attack to their advantage. Find the answer( if you haven't done so already) and you will know its an inside job
 
Read it again.

Pakistan Minister admits Islamabad’s role in Pulwama terror attack


In a sensational admission, a senior Pakistani Minister on Thursday admitted that Pakistan was responsible for the Pulwama terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir in 2019 that killed 40 CRPF personnel and brought the two countries to the brink of a war.

“ Humne Hindustan ko ghus ke maara (We hit India in their home). Our success in Pulwama, is a success of this nation under the leadership of Imran Khan. You and us are all part of that success,” Science & Technology Minister Fawad Chaudhry said in the National Assembly during a debate.


https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/pakistan-minister-admits-islamabads-role-in-pulwama-terror-attack/article32973658.ece


New Delhi: Pakistan was responsible for the terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pulwama last year in which 40 Indian paramilitary troopers were killed, a Pakistani minister has told the country's legislature, in an apparent admission of the country's role in sponsoring cross-border terrorism.
"Humne Hindustan ko ghus ke maara (We hit India in their home). Our success in Pulwama, is a success of the people under the leadership of Imran Khan. You and we are all part of that success," minister Fawad Chaudhury said in the national assembly.

As the statement sparked an uproar in the assembly, he appeared to change tack, rephrasing his line as: "Pulwama ke waqiyeh ke baad, jab humne India ko ghus ke maara (When we hit India in their home after the incident at Pulwama)".

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/india-ko-ghus-ke-maara-pakistan-minister-fawad-chaudhury-owns-pulwama-attack-2317611

I watched the video you posted, there was no uproar. This is how Parliament proceedings people speak over each other all the time. If someone gets emotional while delivering a speech others correct him. Happens everywhere in the World.

It was a proud moment for all Pakistanis he didn't say anything that convicts Pakistan. Again sensational journalism and no evidence of any sorts.
 
I watched the video you posted, there was no uproar. This is how Parliament proceedings people speak over each other all the time. If someone gets emotional while delivering a speech others correct him. Happens everywhere in the World.

It was a proud moment for all Pakistanis he didn't say anything that convicts Pakistan. Again sensational journalism and no evidence of any sorts.

He clearly said this but you still arguing.

“ Humne Hindustan ko ghus ke maara (We hit India in their home). Our success in Pulwama, is a success of this nation under the leadership of Imran Khan. You and us are all part of that success,” Science & Technology Minister Fawad Chaudhry said in the National Assembly during a debate.

What does it mean? :))
 
He clearly said this but you still arguing.

“ Humne Hindustan ko ghus ke maara (We hit India in their home). Our success in Pulwama, is a success of this nation under the leadership of Imran Khan. You and us are all part of that success,” Science & Technology Minister Fawad Chaudhry said in the National Assembly during a debate.

What does it mean? :))

Look at the context. Anyways he was a science & tech minister not even a minister of defence. All he is doing is celebrating and giving Imran Khan credit for the response.

Your evidence is basically that he referred to the series of events as 'Pulwama'. Really that's clutching at straws. India has had enough time since then to present something more concrete i.e. how the explosives got in India, how the terrorists planned etc. but you have nothing on that front because simply Pakistan wasn't involved.
 
Ok again no proof from your side just opinions.

As for Pakistan economically and military, we are a very dheet qoam. India has been trying hard to isolate us but the whole World is supporting us economically not to default. Pakistan isn't going anywhere and will always be ready to respond.

Proof is given by the government to the ones that matter. UN and other important countries were given the proof.

Proof isn't for cricket forums.

Don't care about what dheet or whatever you are, any provocation will be retaliated with disproportionate force, no more option of low cost terrorist strategy.
 
Look at the context. Anyways he was a science & tech minister not even a minister of defence. All he is doing is celebrating and giving Imran Khan credit for the response.

Your evidence is basically that he referred to the series of events as 'Pulwama'. Really that's clutching at straws. India has had enough time since then to present something more concrete i.e. how the explosives got in India, how the terrorists planned etc. but you have nothing on that front because simply Pakistan wasn't involved.

Present to whom? You? Internet forums?
 
Look at the context. Anyways he was a science & tech minister not even a minister of defence. All he is doing is celebrating and giving Imran Khan credit for the response.

Your evidence is basically that he referred to the series of events as 'Pulwama'. Really that's clutching at straws. India has had enough time since then to present something more concrete i.e. how the explosives got in India, how the terrorists planned etc. but you have nothing on that front because simply Pakistan wasn't involved.

Presented enough evidence.

National Investigation Agency (NIA) has pieced together the puzzle, including identifying the Pulwama bombmaker, how he planned and executed his deadly assignment and who his masters were. On August 25, the central agency filed a 13,800-page charge-sheet in a special court in Jammu in which it accused 19 individuals, seven of them Pakistani nationals including the JeM top brass, of aiding, abetting and executing the terror attack.

However, the NIA's most striking revelation is the role of the then 22-year-old Pakistani Muhammad Umar Farooq, who led the JeM module that executed the attack. Umar Farooq was an expert bombmaker, and the NIA has evidence to show that a fortnight before the attack, he had assembled the two Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs), weighing a total of 200 kilograms, with a potent mix of explosives, including RDX, at a house in Kakapora, Pulwama, not far from the site of the attack.

To understand the significance of Umar Farooq, you must first know that he was the son of another wanted man-the Pakistani terrorist Mohammad Ibrahim Ather. Ather and JeM chief Masood Azhar are brothers. In December 1999, Ather played a prominent part in the hijacking of IC-814, the Indian Airlines flight from Kathmandu to Delhi and on to Kandahar in Afghanistan. The hijackers, backed by the ruling Taliban and Pakistan's ISI, demanded the release of three prisoners in Indian jails before letting off the passengers they held hostage and allowing the aircraft to return to India. Among the three prisoners the Indian government agreed to release was Masood Azhar, who had been arrested in 1994 on suspicion of being a terrorist and lodged in a Jammu jail.

On his release, Masood Azhar returned to Bahawalpur, his base in Pakistan, where he set up the JeM in March 2000. In the next two years, the JeM conducted spectacular attacks, including one in April 2000 on the Army's 15 Corps headquarters in Badami Bagh in Srinagar in which seven personnel were injured, and another on October 1, 2001, when a suicide bomb attack on the J&K assembly left 38 people dead. But it was the December 13 attack on Indian Parliament that year, in which eight security personnel lost their lives, that brought the JeM into national and international limelight and pushed India and Pakistan to the brink of war.


There were over 16 hours of voice messages to listen to, including Umar Farooq's chat with JeM's Pakistan-based bosses. The NIA team knew they had hit a gold mine. As the official wryly put it, "If terrorists have kismet, so do we."


https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20200914-the-bombmaker-of-pulwama-1718585-2020-09-05
 
Proof is given by the government to the ones that matter. UN and other important countries were given the proof.

Proof isn't for cricket forums.

Don't care about what dheet or whatever you are, any provocation will be retaliated with disproportionate force, no more option of low cost terrorist strategy.

You're having this discussion on a public forum so if you have anything to back your claims then post it, otherwise it's just opinions.

As for important countries making statements every country comes out in support at someone's time of grief. Pakistan also sent you condolences but Modi decided to attack and do a 'surgical strike' so he can win his electorate. All pre planned.

And your low cost strategy, that's the biggest fail I have heard.. you do realize you sent your jawans in outdated MiG-21s. What did you expect? Oh wait Modi wasn't expecting the Pakistani surprise.
 
Last edited:
Presented enough evidence.

National Investigation Agency (NIA) has pieced together the puzzle, including identifying the Pulwama bombmaker, how he planned and executed his deadly assignment and who his masters were. On August 25, the central agency filed a 13,800-page charge-sheet in a special court in Jammu in which it accused 19 individuals, seven of them Pakistani nationals including the JeM top brass, of aiding, abetting and executing the terror attack.

However, the NIA's most striking revelation is the role of the then 22-year-old Pakistani Muhammad Umar Farooq, who led the JeM module that executed the attack. Umar Farooq was an expert bombmaker, and the NIA has evidence to show that a fortnight before the attack, he had assembled the two Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs), weighing a total of 200 kilograms, with a potent mix of explosives, including RDX, at a house in Kakapora, Pulwama, not far from the site of the attack.

To understand the significance of Umar Farooq, you must first know that he was the son of another wanted man-the Pakistani terrorist Mohammad Ibrahim Ather. Ather and JeM chief Masood Azhar are brothers. In December 1999, Ather played a prominent part in the hijacking of IC-814, the Indian Airlines flight from Kathmandu to Delhi and on to Kandahar in Afghanistan. The hijackers, backed by the ruling Taliban and Pakistan's ISI, demanded the release of three prisoners in Indian jails before letting off the passengers they held hostage and allowing the aircraft to return to India. Among the three prisoners the Indian government agreed to release was Masood Azhar, who had been arrested in 1994 on suspicion of being a terrorist and lodged in a Jammu jail.

On his release, Masood Azhar returned to Bahawalpur, his base in Pakistan, where he set up the JeM in March 2000. In the next two years, the JeM conducted spectacular attacks, including one in April 2000 on the Army's 15 Corps headquarters in Badami Bagh in Srinagar in which seven personnel were injured, and another on October 1, 2001, when a suicide bomb attack on the J&K assembly left 38 people dead. But it was the December 13 attack on Indian Parliament that year, in which eight security personnel lost their lives, that brought the JeM into national and international limelight and pushed India and Pakistan to the brink of war.


There were over 16 hours of voice messages to listen to, including Umar Farooq's chat with JeM's Pakistan-based bosses. The NIA team knew they had hit a gold mine. As the official wryly put it, "If terrorists have kismet, so do we."


https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20200914-the-bombmaker-of-pulwama-1718585-2020-09-05

So Pakistani terrorists are freely roaming Indian streets and getting explosives into the country? If this was the case there would be terrorist attacks everyday.
 
First time I am hearing a cabinet minister speaking in the floor of parliament is not a fact but an expelled governor speaking in left media is burden of proof :)))

#AllInsideJob

:kp
 
Indians are occupying , oppressing Kashmiris. A Kashmiri killed the soldiers involved in occupation. He had every right to do so in every moral and universal law.

You support such terrorist abuse by your troops with guns but then cry when people fight back ?

Indian who believe this need to be taken off the streets and put into mental asylums.
 
First time I am hearing a cabinet minister speaking in the floor of parliament is not a fact but an expelled governor speaking in left media is burden of proof :)))

#AllInsideJob

:kp

Well in all honesty when India refers to Pulwama most Pakistanis think 'the tea was fantastic'. Such was the comprehensive victory Pakistan remembers. Most Pakistanis even if they're ministers couldn't even tell you where Pulwama is.
 
You're having this discussion on a public forum so if you have anything to back your claims then post it, otherwise it's just opinions.

As for important countries making statements every country comes out in support at someone's time of grief. Pakistan also sent you condolences but Modi decided to attack and do a 'surgical strike' so he can win his electorate. All pre planned.

And your low cost strategy, that's the biggest fail I have heard.. you do realize you sent your jawans in outdated MiG-21s. What did you expect? Oh wait Modi wasn't expecting the Pakistani surprise.

Statements by different governments and UN isn't opinion. Its based on facts. You agreeing or not won't change that.

There is a difference between condolences and naming the perpetrators and their country of origin.

What Modi did was absolutely correct!

And even before that incident, he was leading on all opinion polls by a significant margin.

May be someone thought that Modi will be shown as a weak leader by this incident and people won't vote him. It backfired.


India sent Mirage 2000s that penetrated inside Pakistan, bombed Balakote, returned unchallenged.

Lol. What was the situation in Pakistan was very well delineated by Ayaz Sadiq in the pakistani national assembly.
 
So Pakistani terrorists are freely roaming Indian streets and getting explosives into the country? If this was the case there would be terrorist attacks everyday.

How did so many terror attacks happen across the world?
 
Well in all honesty when India refers to Pulwama most Pakistanis think 'the tea was fantastic'. Such was the comprehensive victory Pakistan remembers. Most Pakistanis even if they're ministers couldn't even tell you where Pulwama is.

Pakistanis can keep thinking. They have been thinking what to do since India removed article 370. What did it achieve?
 
So Pakistani terrorists are freely roaming Indian streets and getting explosives into the country? If this was the case there would be terrorist attacks everyday.

They definitely would which is what used to happen back in the day. Not anymore as the repercussions are pretty costly for Pakistan.

Anyhow, the excruciatingly detailed evidence described in that article not good enough for you I suppose ?

here is the link again ... its a pretty lengthy read: https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/...4-the-bombmaker-of-pulwama-1718585-2020-09-05
 
He clearly said this but you still arguing.

“ Humne Hindustan ko ghus ke maara (We hit India in their home). Our success in Pulwama, is a success of this nation under the leadership of Imran Khan. You and us are all part of that success,” Science & Technology Minister Fawad Chaudhry said in the National Assembly during a debate.

What does it mean? :))


It is obvious to me, even as an Indian, that the proud moment the Pak minister was refering to was the aftermath of Pulwama .. i.e he meant the Abhinandan incident. Minister Fawad wasn't talking about the Pulwama bombing that killed the 40 soldiers. There's no way a minister would celebrate a roadside bombing as 'a proud moment' in Parliament, especially a civilian leader.

A bit of common sense please.
 
Last edited:
It is obvious to me, even as an Indian, that the proud moment the Pak minister was refering to was the aftermath of Pulwama .. i.e he meant the Abhinandan incident. Minister Fawad wasn't talking about the Pulwama bombing that killed the 40 soldiers. There's no way a minister would celebrate a roadside bombing as 'a proud moment' in Parliament, especially a civilian leader.

A bit of common sense please.

Watch that clip between 0:05 and 0:12 seconds and let us know what you make out of it. Man says "Pulwama mey jo hamari kaamiyabi hai" 2 twice.
 
Been saying this since day 1, Pulwama aas a failure on the Indian armed forces part. Nothing to do with Pakistan. Possibly even an inside job

In the interview, the honorable :) governor clearly states that there were terrible security lapses including:
1. Home Ministry under Rajnath Singh refusing the CRPF's request for aircraft to transport their men. Which resulted in the unprecedented event of a large convoy of over 900 having to travel by road in one batch, rather than staggered.
2. He also mentions that none of the 8 (or 9, don't remember) roads with junctions were sanitized or cordoned off with a Gypsy which is standard protocol.
3. He clearly refuted Karan's query whether it was an inside job and said something like, No, the explosives came from Pakistan, but there was a failure from the CRPF, the Home Ministry and the Intelligence to detect this for over 2 weeks.

Basically, to sum up:
Starting January, there were plenty of intel reports suggesting an imminent attack on Indian forces. This was carried in The Print before the Pulwama attack.
The government was certainly aware of the threat.
I had speculated at the time that Modi decided to not act on the intel and to allow the attack to help his election chances. So while I never believed it to be an inside job, it was like they decided to look the other way, because it would be favorable to them.

I can't find the exact post but I found one where I've referenced it. And guess who was the other person who'd agreed and thought of this possibility himself :apology.

His response also shows, how blindly the bhakts hate the Congress and don't care about sacrificing Indian lives, so long as Modi keeps winning.

[MENTION=428]Romali_rotti[/MENTION]
Weren't you the other person here apart from me who suspected Modiji's role in Pulwama. What happened? tata, byebye?

Wah Modiji wah wah.

Yeap, I have my suspicion that Pulwama may have been a setup, however I have no evidence to back it up...... Let me tell you the scenario here, even if there was all the proof in the world that Pulwama was a setup, I would still prefer Modi over little boy Rahul Gandhi (That tells you how I feel about him and the opposition).... Children like Rahul Gandhi shouldn't be in politics, remove the word 'Gandhi' entirely from Congress, then they would be worth giving a chance, provided they field a PM candidate that is also not a child, otherwise :shhh
 
Last edited:
In the interview, the honorable :) governor clearly states that there were terrible security lapses including:
1. Home Ministry under Rajnath Singh refusing the CRPF's request for aircraft to transport their men. Which resulted in the unprecedented event of a large convoy of over 900 having to travel by road in one batch, rather than staggered.
2. He also mentions that none of the 8 (or 9, don't remember) roads with junctions were sanitized or cordoned off with a Gypsy which is standard protocol.
3. He clearly refuted Karan's query whether it was an inside job and said something like, No, the explosives came from Pakistan, but there was a failure from the CRPF, the Home Ministry and the Intelligence to detect this for over 2 weeks.

Basically, to sum up:
Starting January, there were plenty of intel reports suggesting an imminent attack on Indian forces. This was carried in The Print before the Pulwama attack.
The government was certainly aware of the threat.
I had speculated at the time that Modi decided to not act on the intel and to allow the attack to help his election chances. So while I never believed it to be an inside job, it was like they decided to look the other way, because it would be favorable to them.

I can't find the exact post but I found one where I've referenced it. And guess who was the other person who'd agreed and thought of this possibility himself :apology.

His response also shows, how blindly the bhakts hate the Congress and don't care about sacrificing Indian lives, so long as Modi keeps winning.
Indeed. How can any Indian, in their right mind ever support feku when it's abundantly clear that he is such a danger to our armed forces.

Despite knowing pretty well that those 40 army personnel were sitting ducks on that route, Rajnath and feku did nothing to alleviate the obvious danger to the lives of those 40 army personnel.

Do I need to mention how much money feku spends on his own security?
 
So, do I hold my breath for any upcoming bollywood movie on this? I always use that as my source of ultimate truth.
 
Do I need to mention that when Pulwama happened, feku was shooting for yet another vanity project of his, a documentary at Jim Corbett and even after hearing the dastardly news, he kept shooting the documentary?
 
How did so many terror attacks happen across the world?

When a group of people are oppressed by a stronger power, there's retaliation. Same thing happened in IOK Pulwama. As your claim is always that Kashmir is India's internal problem so you should then own up to this sort of terrorism. Pointing fingers at Pakistan achieves nothing but humiliation for your jawans
 
New Flashpoint In BJP vs Opposition: Satyapal Malik's Remarks On Pulwama Attack
Citing Satyapal Malik's past remarks where he had praised the government, the ruling BJP said that his "U-turns" raised questions about his credibility.

Former Jammu and Kashmir governor Satyapal Malik's comments about the 2019 Pulwama attack have triggered a political storm. During a recent interview, Mr Malik claimed that security lapses led to the Pulwama attack in which 40 CRPF personnel were killed. He also claimed that a request by the paramilitary force asking for an aircraft to commute was denied by the government, which in turn led to the jawans travelling by road.
In the interview with The Wire, Mr Malik also alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi is "ill-informed" about the Jammu and Kashmir region.

Citing his past remarks where he had praised the government, the ruling BJP said that his "U-turns" raised questions about his credibility. BJP's I-T department head Amit Malviya shared several old clips of Mr Malik praising the government and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

"And before Congress minions get all excited about Satyapal Malik, their newfound knight in the shinning armour, here is what he had to say about Rahul Gandhi. So, sit down," Mr Malviya tweeted, sharing a video of Satyapal Malik where he had mocked Rahul Gandhi as a "political juvenile".

Besides calling Rahul Gandhi a "political juvenile", he is heard saying in the video that people will "beat him with shoes" during elections if they are told he (Gandhi) supports Article 370, which was nullified by the Modi government.

Mr Malviya, in another tweet, said, "No one took him (Satyapal Malik) seriously even when he made these allegations back then. But it raises serious questions on his credibility."

On the other hand, the Opposition is demanding information from the probe into the Pulwama incident.

The Congress party, repeating the allegations by Mr Malik, accused PM Modi of "suppressing" the incident to "save" his personal image ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh accused the BJP-led Union government of "minimum governance and maximum silence" and asked it to comment on the claims Mr Malik made on the incident.

Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) leader Sanjay Raut said that the Opposition leaders who had raised questions on the Pulwama attack were "silenced by the ruling BJP and called traitors."

Samajwadi Party also demanded answers on the "incompetence" of the BJP government in preventing the Pulwama attack.

NDTV
 
When a group of people are oppressed by a stronger power, there's retaliation. Same thing happened in IOK Pulwama. As your claim is always that Kashmir is India's internal problem so you should then own up to this sort of terrorism. Pointing fingers at Pakistan achieves nothing but humiliation for your jawans

I see you are giving excuses for terrorists. Not unexpected at all.

Pakistan funding training and financing these attacks is also a problem.

Please look at Bangladesh and Kargil. Then talk about humiliation. History knows which is the largest surrender of armed forces since WW2.

Any provocation from Pakistan will be retaliated with disproportionate force. You can use your IMF bailout and loan money to fight then.
 
I see you are giving excuses for terrorists. Not unexpected at all.

Pakistan funding training and financing these attacks is also a problem.

Please look at Bangladesh and Kargil. Then talk about humiliation. History knows which is the largest surrender of armed forces since WW2.

Any provocation from Pakistan will be retaliated with disproportionate force. You can use your IMF bailout and loan money to fight then.

Ok the country that's fighting and suffering the most from terrorism is sponsoring terrorism in India and that too in Muslim majority area?

You have provided no proof that Pakistan was involved directly or indirectly. Only thing you need to place blame on Pakistan is a Muslim name and Umar Farooq is as Muslim as they come. You don't want to acknowledge the local uprising in IOK due to India force fully holding the region hostage by 800,000 troops. Anyways no point debating this further as your logic is a product of your domestic newsfeeds and can't accept any criticism against Modi.
 
I see you are giving excuses for terrorists. Not unexpected at all.

Pakistan funding training and financing these attacks is also a problem.

Please look at Bangladesh and Kargil. Then talk about humiliation. History knows which is the largest surrender of armed forces since WW2.

Any provocation from Pakistan will be retaliated with disproportionate force. You can use your IMF bailout and loan money to fight then.

This is just unmitigated propaganda, but don't blame you at all for taking this opportunity to pump it. You are a spokesman for your Hindutva govt.
 
In the interview, the honorable :) governor clearly states that there were terrible security lapses including:
1. Home Ministry under Rajnath Singh refusing the CRPF's request for aircraft to transport their men. Which resulted in the unprecedented event of a large convoy of over 900 having to travel by road in one batch, rather than staggered.
2. He also mentions that none of the 8 (or 9, don't remember) roads with junctions were sanitized or cordoned off with a Gypsy which is standard protocol.
3. He clearly refuted Karan's query whether it was an inside job and said something like, No, the explosives came from Pakistan, but there was a failure from the CRPF, the Home Ministry and the Intelligence to detect this for over 2 weeks.

Basically, to sum up:
Starting January, there were plenty of intel reports suggesting an imminent attack on Indian forces. This was carried in The Print before the Pulwama attack.
The government was certainly aware of the threat.
I had speculated at the time that Modi decided to not act on the intel and to allow the attack to help his election chances. So while I never believed it to be an inside job, it was like they decided to look the other way, because it would be favorable to them.

I can't find the exact post but I found one where I've referenced it. And guess who was the other person who'd agreed and thought of this possibility himself :apology.

His response also shows, how blindly the bhakts hate the Congress and don't care about sacrificing Indian lives, so long as Modi keeps winning.


Please let me clarify.

I do not hate Congress, but I do not support our mahaan diaper pooping Raul Puppu, nor Ammayi Sonya aka Made in Italia, Spaghetti Eat gaya, Pyara Soniyaa (sorry was remixing the made in India song :bumrah), Fraud Vadra, Humanoid Priyanka etc :wahab2.

It seems my posts are causing you a lot of anxiety, as you seem to be quoting me a few times now, please forgive me I am just an NRI who has no say or stake in what happens in Indian politics. Don't let m opinion control your life :apology

Look forward to speaking with you especially after BJP wins the 2024 elections :uakmal
 
Look forward to speaking with you especially after BJP wins the 2024 elections :uakmal

Let's take it step by step. Karnataka is coming up before that :apology

Please look at Bangladesh and Kargil. Then talk about humiliation. History knows which is the largest surrender of armed forces since WW2.

Indira Gandhi and Vajpayee.

Under Modi:
1. Modi runs to eat biryani with Nawaz Sharif and receives as a return gift
Uri attack
Pathankot attack
Pulwama attack

Anyone else with a bit of shame would have resigned especially after all his false bravado.

2. Does a dubious airstrike and in return India receives its first humiliation in a direct conflict with Pakistan. Intelligence and control is all over the place and a friendly fire incident kills 6 IAF officers.

3. Acts like a clown around the Chinese boss and loses land to China.

Anyone with a little bit of shame would have stopped voting for Modi or trying to present him as competent enough to protect Indian interests.

I won't go into his other achievements and corruption for now in this thread.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&#55357;&#56586;: PR NO. 7️⃣4️⃣/2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣3️⃣<br><br>Latest Revelations about the Pulwama Attack Vindicate Pakistan<br><br>&#55357;&#56599;⬇️<a href="https://t.co/6JzSkeqDfx">https://t.co/6JzSkeqDfx</a> <a href="https://t.co/76GoF7n9dz">pic.twitter.com/76GoF7n9dz</a></p>— Spokesperson &#55356;&#56821;&#55356;&#56816; MoFA (@ForeignOfficePk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ForeignOfficePk/status/1647509274824679428?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Ok the country that's fighting and suffering the most from terrorism is sponsoring terrorism in India and that too in Muslim majority area?

You have provided no proof that Pakistan was involved directly or indirectly. Only thing you need to place blame on Pakistan is a Muslim name and Umar Farooq is as Muslim as they come. You don't want to acknowledge the local uprising in IOK due to India force fully holding the region hostage by 800,000 troops. Anyways no point debating this further as your logic is a product of your domestic newsfeeds and can't accept any criticism against Modi.

What was that Hilary Clinton statement on Snakes in the backyard?

Ofcourse Pakistan is training equipping funding these terrorists and then calls them freedom fighters. Just like you defended them in another post.

Provided proof to whom? Who is the authority here? Proof was provided to those who matter, the likes of UN and other important countries. It reflects in their statements. UN specifically mentions a Pakistani organisation as responsible for the attack. So did US France etc.

Pakistan was on the FATF list for terror financing not too long ago.

I don't know where you got that figure of 800k but most of the troops or on the LoC. Pakistan has tried to illegally capture Kashmir via military invasion thrice. So no wonder we keep troops on the LoC to dissuade pakistanis from trying any military adventures.
 
Nothing stays a secret for too long- people have evor3s to settle and often books to sell. If we accept that it wasn't an inside job but Modi allowed 40 Ind soldiers to be killed so that he could win an election. That is just as shocking and anyone with an ounce of ghairat would resign but not the fascist
 
Nothing stays a secret for too long- people have evor3s to settle and often books to sell. If we accept that it wasn't an inside job but Modi allowed 40 Ind soldiers to be killed so that he could win an election. That is just as shocking and anyone with an ounce of ghairat would resign but not the fascist

Where in the video did any of this was said?

Ohh let me think, another twisting of facts for your own convenience.
 
Where in the video did any of this was said?

Ohh let me think, another twisting of facts for your own convenience.

The guys confession speaks for itself. We need to look at the facts- modi used the attack for elections, remember even before this there had been Ind attacks on the LOC to get something going. It all ended when your pilot was captured and given our tea
 
The guys confession speaks for itself. We need to look at the facts- modi used the attack for elections, remember even before this there had been Ind attacks on the LOC to get something going. It all ended when your pilot was captured and given our tea

Confession? What confession?

First of all, every terrorist attack in the world, be it India Pakistan Europe US anywhere is a intelligence and security failure.

That doesn't mean the attack was not a terrorist attack.

India says and has always said, even before Modi that ceasefire violations on the LoC are initiated by Pakistan. And its a cover to help terrorists cross the LoC.

The terror attack put Modi on the backfoot. He was already leading in on all opinion polls.

If Modi hadn't conducted the Balakote attacks and hadn't extracted Abhinandan out of Pakistan, opposition would have torn him to bits.
 
Last edited:
But that doesn't mean it was not a terrorist attack and it was planned funded executed by a terrorist organisation based in Pakistan.

And the chest thumping of PTI minister in pakistani assembly just proved it.

And it took just 5 seconds to blame Pakistan for this attack. Coincidentally, it happened just before the elections. :inti
 
Confession? What confession?

First of all, every terrorist attack in the world, be it India Pakistan Europe US anywhere is a intelligence and security failure.

That doesn't mean the attack was not a terrorist attack.

India says and has always said, even before Modi that ceasefire violations on the LoC are initiated by Pakistan. And its a cover to help terrorists cross the LoC.

The terror attack put Modi on the backfoot. He was already leading in on all opinion polls.

If Modi hadn't conducted the Balakote attacks and hadn't extracted Abhinandan out of Pakistan, opposition would have torn him to bits.

Yes, that whole image of chai walla in commando jacket with grenades hanging, bulging biceps, holding automatic rifles in each hand mowing down pakistani soldiers on his way to rescuing abhinandan, all the while making sure he didnt spill even a drop from his tea cup… was instrumental in keeping his PMship.
 
They definitely would which is what used to happen back in the day. Not anymore as the repercussions are pretty costly for Pakistan.

Anyhow, the excruciatingly detailed evidence described in that article not good enough for you I suppose ?

here is the link again ... its a pretty lengthy read: https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/...4-the-bombmaker-of-pulwama-1718585-2020-09-05

Ok the country that's fighting and suffering the most from terrorism is sponsoring terrorism in India and that too in Muslim majority area?

You have provided no proof that Pakistan was involved directly or indirectly.
Only thing you need to place blame on Pakistan is a Muslim name and Umar Farooq is as Muslim as they come. You don't want to acknowledge the local uprising in IOK due to India force fully holding the region hostage by 800,000 troops. Anyways no point debating this further as your logic is a product of your domestic newsfeeds and can't accept any criticism against Modi.

did you go thru that link? it details how the investigation agencies found incriminating evidence from Umar's phone.


As for 800K soldiers in J&K .... watch this video from a bazaar and see how many soldiers you can spot or any other signs of oppression : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOJ2-W85dro&ab_channel=YanaMir
 
Confession? What confession?

First of all, every terrorist attack in the world, be it India Pakistan Europe US anywhere is a intelligence and security failure.

That doesn't mean the attack was not a terrorist attack.

India says and has always said, even before Modi that ceasefire violations on the LoC are initiated by Pakistan. And its a cover to help terrorists cross the LoC.

The terror attack put Modi on the backfoot. He was already leading in on all opinion polls.

If Modi hadn't conducted the Balakote attacks and hadn't extracted Abhinandan out of Pakistan, opposition would have torn him to bits.

This guy has confessed that Modi used the attack to win an election- he was willing to risk Nuclear war over an election. I am telling you that this was a planned inside job, and remember sooner or later, mors will come out.
 
This guy has confessed that Modi used the attack to win an election- he was willing to risk Nuclear war over an election. I am telling you that this was a planned inside job, and remember sooner or later, mors will come out.

Pulwama looked like an inside job from the start anyway. Surgical strikes was as fake as it gets. And less said about Abhinandan the better. Was a shameful day for India except andhbhakhts who were made to believe by godi media that Abhinandan is a hero and Pakistan got scared. :inti
 
Inside job? So all those countries and UN who issued statements must be idiots.

There is no need for any new narrative. The narrative is known since 1947.

Aren’t you always saying opinions of other countries doesn’t matter one bit, whenever these same countries are deriding india for human rights violations, suppression of Muslims or Sikhs etc etc.? Atleast be consistent lol
 
Aren’t you always saying opinions of other countries doesn’t matter one bit, whenever these same countries are deriding india for human rights violations, suppression of Muslims or Sikhs etc etc.? Atleast be consistent lol


Good one. Would like to see his response now. :inti
 
Aren’t you always saying opinions of other countries doesn’t matter one bit, whenever these same countries are deriding india for human rights violations, suppression of Muslims or Sikhs etc etc.? Atleast be consistent lol

The person was asking if India provided proof. I just told him that UN named a Pakistani organisation as the perpetrators.

Various countries with vast intelligent network also named a Pakistani organisation as the perpetrators.


US UK France moved a resolution in UNSC to ban a Pakistani for the terror attacks.

Proof is provided to UN or important countries. Not on online forums
 
The person was asking if India provided proof. I just told him that UN named a Pakistani organisation as the perpetrators.

Various countries with vast intelligent network also named a Pakistani organisation as the perpetrators.


US UK France moved a resolution in UNSC to ban a Pakistani for the terror attacks.

Proof is provided to UN or important countries. Not on online forums

Countries change their stance according to the situation. Most were concerned about escalation of the scenario and possibility of a full blown war, which would have dire consequences for not just the region but all of the World.

The exact words of the US State Department were:

"We have been in close communication with the government of India to express not only our condolences but our strong support for India as it confronts this terrorism. We urge Pakistan to fully cooperate with the investigation into the attack and to punish anyone responsible." - Robert Palladino, Feb 19

No where does that say it was Pakistan that did it, instead they wanted Pakistan to be a part of the investigation, again due to Indian insistence of blaming Pakistan and threatening war.

It's easy to say you're sharing intelligence with other countries, which is highly doubtful in the first place as India never shared that intelligence with Pakistan. Modi jumped the gun before any credible investigation could take place as he wanted to come across as a strong leader by putting Pakistan in its place. Sure he was going to win anyways but not in the majority that he has now.

Also due to the Pakistani surprise of the Pulwama aftermath, India has been very careful not to name Pakistan. Case in point is the recent Jawans being shot in a military base in Punjab. Not a peep from India about terrorists from Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
Countries change their stance according to the situation. Most were concerned about escalation of the scenario and possibility of a full blown war, which would have dire consequences for not just the region but all of the World.

The exact words of the US State Department were:

"We have been in close communication with the government of India to express not only our condolences but our strong support for India as it confronts this terrorism. We urge Pakistan to fully cooperate with the investigation into the attack and to punish anyone responsible." - Robert Palladino, Feb 19

No where does that say it was Pakistan that did it, instead they wanted Pakistan to be a part of the investigation, again due to Indian insistence of blaming Pakistan and threatening war.

It's easy to say you're sharing intelligence with other countries, which is highly doubtful in the first place as India never shared that intelligence with Pakistan. Modi jumped the gun before any credible investigation could take place as he wanted to come across as a strong leader by putting Pakistan in its place. Sure he was going to win anyways but not in the majority that he has now.

Also due to the Pakistani surprise of the Pulwama aftermath, India has been very careful not to name Pakistan. Case in point is the recent Jawans being shot in a military base in Punjab. Not a peep from India about terrorists from Pakistan.


You need to search more.


The United States calls on Pakistan to end immediately the support and safe haven provided to all terrorist groups operating on its soil, whose only goal is to sow chaos, violence, and terror in the region," White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said in a late night statement on Thursday.

This attack only strengthens our resolve to bolster counter-terrorism cooperation and coordination between the United States and India," she said in a strongly-worded statement issued by the White House.



Share intelligence with pakistan. :))

The jawan were killed by another jawan. Why will anyone name Pakistan?

What surprise? Lol your jets didn't even cross the LoC and released glide weapons that failed to hit anything.

If Pakistan provokes again it will again receive the response it deserves.
 
You need to search more.


The United States calls on Pakistan to end immediately the support and safe haven provided to all terrorist groups operating on its soil, whose only goal is to sow chaos, violence, and terror in the region," White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said in a late night statement on Thursday.

This attack only strengthens our resolve to bolster counter-terrorism cooperation and coordination between the United States and India," she said in a strongly-worded statement issued by the White House.



Share intelligence with pakistan. :))

The jawan were killed by another jawan. Why will anyone name Pakistan?

What surprise? Lol your jets didn't even cross the LoC and released glide weapons that failed to hit anything.

If Pakistan provokes again it will again receive the response it deserves.

That's the point. These things happen in India without Pakistan's involvement. Just like Pulwama.

They didn't hit anything? So Abhinandan just landed in Pakistan from the air? Maybe one of our spy pigeons kidnapped him.

We loved India's response, keep them coming.
 
In before sanghis roll in telling us Malik will be judged by impartial Indian courts and found guilty of lying under oath and besmirching the reputation of the country.

lol haha - It take long.

This governor was fired. Now he is looking for another alternative political domain.

PM of India calls him from a Dhaba. Right. :))

So the ex-minister is lying, and Modi/BJP had no role to play in sending those 40 Indian soldiers to jahannum?
 
You need to search more.


The United States calls on Pakistan to end immediately the support and safe haven provided to all terrorist groups operating on its soil, whose only goal is to sow chaos, violence, and terror in the region," White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said in a late night statement on Thursday.

This attack only strengthens our resolve to bolster counter-terrorism cooperation and coordination between the United States and India," she said in a strongly-worded statement issued by the White House.



Share intelligence with pakistan. :))

The jawan were killed by another jawan. Why will anyone name Pakistan?

What surprise? Lol your jets didn't even cross the LoC and released glide weapons that failed to hit anything.

If Pakistan provokes again it will again receive the response it deserves.

Yes, those United States that attacked Iraq after 9/11 when the hijackers were Saudi.
 
That's the point. These things happen in India without Pakistan's involvement. Just like Pulwama.

They didn't hit anything? So Abhinandan just landed in Pakistan from the air? Maybe one of our spy pigeons kidnapped him.

We loved India's response, keep them coming.

Pulwama was a terrorist attack funded planned carried out by a Pakistani organisation. The whole world knows.

You need to really read about the entire episode. You have almost no knowledge about the sequence of events or what happened.
 
lol haha - It take long.



So the ex-minister is lying, and Modi/BJP had no role to play in sending those 40 Indian soldiers to jahannum?

He isn't a minister.

The PM of India called him from a public phone froma Dhaba. Yes very believable.
 
That's the point. These things happen in India without Pakistan's involvement. Just like Pulwama.

They didn't hit anything? So Abhinandan just landed in Pakistan from the air? Maybe one of our spy pigeons kidnapped him.

We loved India's response, keep them coming.

So US named Pakistan. Do you want me to post the UN statement naming a Pakistani organisation?
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Revelations by ex-Governor of IIOJK about reality of Pulwama incident & how Indian govt exploited situation for political gains vindicates Pakistan's position. World should take note of India's dangerous brinkmanship that could have led to disastrous consequences for the region.</p>— Shehbaz Sharif (@CMShehbaz) <a href="https://twitter.com/CMShehbaz/status/1647927756640993282?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 17, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
The person was asking if India provided proof. I just told him that UN named a Pakistani organisation as the perpetrators.

Various countries with vast intelligent network also named a Pakistani organisation as the perpetrators.


US UK France moved a resolution in UNSC to ban a Pakistani for the terror attacks.

Proof is provided to UN or important countries. Not on online forums

So what was the outcome of this proof provided of Pakistan terror attack? Surely if there was proof, then some sort of sanction must have been imposed although a terror attack would require a world military response if they believe it to be true.
 
So US named Pakistan. Do you want me to post the UN statement naming a Pakistani organisation?

You can post what you like as long as it's credible. Naming a Pakistani organization does not mean Pakistan is funding terrorists or that Pakistanis are involved.
 
It was the US that debunked India's narrative with respect to fighter jets.

Let this sink in.
 
Back
Top