What's new

“We’ve integrated six new players during this series, which is vital for building our depth”: Mike Hesson

Cricket Warrior

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2023
Runs
24,537
Mike Hesson's press conference After Pakistan vs Bangladesh ODI series:

Interviewer: When chasing a target of that magnitude, things have to go your way. How do you assess the team’s performance today, especially after the shaky start at 3 for 17?

Coach: You’re absolutely right. When you’re chasing a target like that, a lot of things have to fall into place. Falling to 3 for 17 obviously put us on the back foot immediately, but I thought the way we responded from that point was exceptional. What was particularly encouraging was seeing our younger players—some of whom are making their debuts in this series—step up. Players like Gazi and Samad showed they belong at this level. While they would have liked to stay out there longer, their composure helped get us back into the contest. From there, Saad Masood and Salman Agha really pulled us back from the brink, and Salman Ali Agha played as well as he has in a long time in ODI cricket. It was a high-quality game of cricket to finish what has been a defining series.

Interviewer: Did you miss Babar Azam with the inexperienced players seemed to struggle across all three matches.

Coach: You have to give players opportunities. We’ve integrated six new players during this series, which is vital for building our depth. We are currently missing several first-choice players, so as a selection group, the goal was to "blood" some new talent. Bangladesh is a notoriously difficult place to play. Despite that, players like Maaz Sadaqat and the three I mentioned earlier showed they have the temperament for international cricket. They’ve had a taste of it now, and it’s up to them to push hard for more opportunities in the future.

Interviewer: Regarding the specific incidents on the field—the tension out in the middle and the issues regarding run-ups—did those moments provide Salman Ali Agha with extra motivation or did they prove to be a distraction?

Coach: He isn't the type of character who needs extra motivation to perform. He spoke very clearly about it after the last match. There was a lot of "hoo-ha" and noise out in the middle, and I think he realized he played a part in that environment. However, he was fiercely determined today—as was the entire squad—to deliver a performance. It resulted in a really fine hundred. I also thought Tanzid Hasan Tamim played beautifully in the first innings, and Salman Agha was exceptional in the second. We witnessed two very high-caliber innings today.

Interviewer: Shaheen has captained the last two series wins at home, but this series ended in a loss. Given Pakistan's early exit from the World Cup and now this series defeat, how concerned are you about the bigger picture?

Coach: We have to remember this was essentially a new team. We made significant progress in those two home series wins under Shaheen’s leadership but for this tour, we viewed it as a specific opportunity to evaluate our youth. There are many positive signs to take away. While the overall result is a series loss, the development of these younger players is a crucial step in rebuilding the ODI squad.

Interviewer: Can you comment on the opposition's batting? How difficult was it to contain them?

Coach: He was relentless. If we missed our mark even slightly, he capitalized. When we bowled too straight, he picked us off; if we went wide, he punished us through the offside. He’s got a very effective slog-sweep against the spin and uses the depth of the crease well. He also showed great mental toughness by batting through adversity and cramps. It was a fine innings that set them up with a very competitive total.

Interviewer: What are your thoughts on Shaheen’s captaincy throughout this series?

Coach: I think he’s done a great job. Leading a side full of youngsters isn't easy; you’re essentially learning about your players' strengths on the fly. Shaheen remained consistently positive. When the energy of the group dipped, he was the one to lift them back up. Tactically, I thought he was quite smart. On a personal level, I also think he bowled as well as he has in a long time from a length perspective. All in all, he’s had a very solid series.

Interviewer: You must be pleased with the bowling performance in the death overs?

Coach: Definitely. To be fair, I was pleased with the way we bowled the final 35 overs. We were a bit untidy in the first 15, but we pulled the game back nicely after that. In the last 10 overs, we used pace changes effectively and found a bit of reverse swing to keep the target within reach. If they had reached 320, the game probably would have been beyond us. There are good signs there from both the veterans and the youngsters.
 
Tbf I agree with him.

Good to see Maaz, Saad and Ghazi do well

Samad showing some promise.

Farhan has been disappointing, but he will come good.

Shamyl isn’t ready at all. Needs lots and lots of work.
 
Youngsters should be given an extended run. It was a good fightback given the poor start. Disappointing that Agha and co. could not close out the game.

We are losing with Rizwan and Babar (past his prime) in the team anyway

Might as well build for the future.
 
Youngsters should be given an extended run. It was a good fightback given the poor start. Disappointing that Agha and co. could not close out the game.

We are losing with Rizwan and Babar (past his prime) in the team anyway

Might as well build for the future.
Yes, give them time. We have given the others 6 years!
 
I am more worried about the test series in England this August.

Are we really prepared for that? Have we done our homework?

Do we have the pacers and, more importantly, the batters to compete with England in England?

Should try to at least win one test.
 
I am more worried about the test series in England this August.

Are we really prepared for that? Have we done our homework?

Do we have the pacers and, more importantly, the batters to compete with England in England?

Should try to at least win one test.
Pakistan doesn't care about Test cricket, the sooner Pak fans realise and understand this the better.

If they even manage to draw one that will be an achievement in itself. But let's see!
 
Pakistan doesn't care about Test cricket, the sooner Pak fans realise and understand this the better.

If they even manage to draw one that will be an achievement in itself. But let's see!

Pakistan have such a rich Test legacy. It would be a shame if they stop caring about Test.

Test is the ultimate format.
 
Pakistan have such a rich Test legacy. It would be a shame if they stop caring about Test.

Test is the ultimate format.
Barely play test matches, haven't got pacers who can bowl 20 overs in a day.

No batters have the technique to play either.
 
Barely play test matches, haven't got pacers who can bowl 20 overs in a day.

No batters have the technique to play either.

That is a tragedy.

Pakistan is the land of Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Inzamam, Younis Khan, Imran Khan, Hanif Mohammad etc. Some of the biggest Test legends in cricket's history.

I blame T20. T20 has caused great harm to cricketing nations (including Pakistan).
 
I am more worried about the test series in England this August.

Are we really prepared for that? Have we done our homework?

Do we have the pacers and, more importantly, the batters to compete with England in England?

Should try to at least win one test.
Pace battery cupboard is completely empty it seems
 
Pakistan doesn't care about Test cricket, the sooner Pak fans realise and understand this the better.

If they even manage to draw one that will be an achievement in itself. But let's see!
Empty grounds in home series causes problems players will naturally want to play limited overs more...... and PCB will promote T20 and 50 over cricket over tests as one format makes losses and isn't sustainable on its own.
 
Empty grounds in home series causes problems players will naturally want to play limited overs more...... and PCB will promote T20 and 50 over cricket over tests as one format makes losses and isn't sustainable on its own.
Apart from England, Australia and maybe India where the grounds are mostly 80% full, the rest of the countries struggle to get people in.
 
Pace battery cupboard is completely empty it seems

Khurrum Shehzan should do ok in England, maybe we recall Abbas if he’s fit and in form given his experience here, because Shaheen can’t be trusted with the new ball really. It will especially be crucial that they have 5 options including a bowling A/R (Faheem if there’s no one else).

New ball
Shehzad
Abbas
Shaheen (depending on pitch)

Spin
Noman
Sajid Khan (depending on pitch)

Support
Faheem Ashraf

Final:

Shehzad
Abbas
Shaheen
Faheem
Noman

It’s not an exciting attack and am not sure what other options there are, but the above balance will work well in England.

He is out of favour, but I’d have liked to see Ihsanulla being fine tuned for the series and prep him for the 1st change role.

I have very low expectations, it will be a success to avoid a white wash.
 
Pakistan doesn't care about Test cricket, the sooner Pak fans realise and understand this the better.

If they even manage to draw one that will be an achievement in itself. But let's see!
Pakistan does care about test cricket. The interest might have declined slightly in recent years due to the quality (or lack of) of test pacers. They are definitely not as good or exciting as the two Ws or Imran, who were instrumental in Pakistan winning test series in England during the 80s and 90s ... and despite the indifferent batting. There is a huge Pakistani diaspora in the UK, and all tests involving Pakistan are usually well-attended. Pakistan remains a viable market for ECB. It is up to the players now to give some meaningful performances on the field.
 
Tbf I agree with him.

Good to see Maaz, Saad and Ghazi do well

Samad showing some promise.

Farhan has been disappointing, but he will come good.

Shamyl isn’t ready at all. Needs lots and lots of work.
I am biggest farhan fan but I dont think he will work in South africa conditions...should persist with saim and fakhar...they already proven performers in SA.........
 
Pakistan does care about test cricket. The interest might have declined slightly in recent years due to the quality (or lack of) of test pacers. They are definitely not as good or exciting as the two Ws or Imran, who were instrumental in Pakistan winning test series in England during the 80s and 90s ... and despite the indifferent batting. There is a huge Pakistani diaspora in the UK, and all tests involving Pakistan are usually well-attended. Pakistan remains a viable market for ECB. It is up to the players now to give some meaningful performances on the field.
There is a reason Pakistan tour to eng in 2028 is for 5 tests.......
 
I am more worried about the test series in England this August.

Are we really prepared for that? Have we done our homework?

Do we have the pacers and, more importantly, the batters to compete with England in England?

Should try to at least win one test.
This england team is beatable
 
Khurrum Shehzan should do ok in England, maybe we recall Abbas if he’s fit and in form given his experience here, because Shaheen can’t be trusted with the new ball really. It will especially be crucial that they have 5 options including a bowling A/R (Faheem if there’s no one else).

New ball
Shehzad
Abbas
Shaheen (depending on pitch)

Spin
Noman
Sajid Khan (depending on pitch)

Support
Faheem Ashraf

Final:

Shehzad
Abbas
Shaheen
Faheem
Noman

It’s not an exciting attack and am not sure what other options there are, but the above balance will work well in England.

He is out of favour, but I’d have liked to see Ihsanulla being fine tuned for the series and prep him for the 1st change role.

I have very low expectations, it will be a success to avoid a white wash.
Why not give Abrar and Usman a chance in tests as well?
 
I am biggest farhan fan but I dont think he will work in South africa conditions...should persist with saim and fakhar...they already proven performers in SA.........
No disagreements there.

I also feel Maaz will be a good player for those conditions. Pakistan’s 3 openers out of the 15 man squad should be Saim, Fakhar and Maaz.
 
No disagreements there.

I also feel Maaz will be a good player for those conditions. Pakistan’s 3 openers out of the 15 man squad should be Saim, Fakhar and Maaz.
But knowing mindless PCB they will put farhan in squad on basis of t20 performance
 
Maaz at no 6.....
IMO he should open or sit on the bench. We’ve made these mistakes far too many times where we just accommodate openers in the XI.

Number 6 should be someone who has earned his selection performing at 6 for his domestic side.
 
Guy averaging 20 in List A is part of "depth"?
Is that a true reflection of his ability a small sample size for a young player who's still developing and improving.
How will they find a wicketkeeper without playing young players and giving them experience.
 
Pakistan have such a rich Test legacy. It would be a shame if they stop caring about Test.

Test is the ultimate format.
Aqib Javed needs to be removed from Pak cricket. Every decision he makes takes hurts Pak Cricket. Has no sense of what to do.
 
Khurrum Shehzan should do ok in England, maybe we recall Abbas if he’s fit and in form given his experience here, because Shaheen can’t be trusted with the new ball really. It will especially be crucial that they have 5 options including a bowling A/R (Faheem if there’s no one else).

New ball
Shehzad
Abbas
Shaheen (depending on pitch)

Spin
Noman
Sajid Khan (depending on pitch)

Support
Faheem Ashraf

Final:

Shehzad
Abbas
Shaheen
Faheem
Noman

It’s not an exciting attack and am not sure what other options there are, but the above balance will work well in England.

He is out of favour, but I’d have liked to see Ihsanulla being fine tuned for the series and prep him for the 1st change role.

I have very low expectations, it will be a success to avoid a white wash.

I think this would be the team

Saim/Abdullah/Imam (2 of these)
Shan
Babar
Saud
Rizwan
Agha
Fahim
Abbas
Khurram
Noman/Asif Afridi/Sajid/Shaheen (one of these)

They may pick Saim thinking that he can bowl as well along with Agha. Saud may bowl a bit of spin. Hard to see them give debut to anyone in the bowling attack because of lack of test & domestic red ball cricket.
 
Tbh I think ultimately Saim will become a middle order batting all rounder rather than Maaz
That’s a complete under utilisation of his strength

Maaz is clearly a high quality attacker of pace. Him and Saim both are best options for using the pace to their advantage. He isn’t as convincing against spin, and making him start against spinners in the middle will not work.
 
That’s a complete under utilisation of his strength

Maaz is clearly a high quality attacker of pace. Him and Saim both are best options for using the pace to their advantage. He isn’t as convincing against spin, and making him start against spinners in the middle will not work.
Indians saying that its full strength Pakistan that Bangladesh beaten 😂........
 
Hesson is a con artist. Always making excuses and using minnow stats to prop his own coaching. The sooner we kick him out the better. Our entire setup needs a revamp.
 
That’s a complete under utilisation of his strength

Maaz is clearly a high quality attacker of pace. Him and Saim both are best options for using the pace to their advantage. He isn’t as convincing against spin, and making him start against spinners in the middle will not work.
We have some decent openers for next few years.

I think they will keep Farhan, Fakhar, Maaz as opener/top 3.

There is only so many people that can be accommodated in the side.

I rate Saim very highly but unfortunately he is down the pecking order because he hasn't batted well, but his bowling is probably better than Shadab, Nawaz ATM.
 
We have some decent openers for next few years.

I think they will keep Farhan, Fakhar, Maaz as opener/top 3.

There is only so many people that can be accommodated in the side.

I rate Saim very highly but unfortunately he is down the pecking order because he hasn't batted well, but his bowling is probably better than Shadab, Nawaz ATM.
For South Africa I think Saim is a sure starter. His style of play is tailor made for those wickets. Maaz might get some more games with Fakhar sitting out resting for the World Cup so he might show us that he’s the better choice to open with Saim. If not, Fakhar is the safe option for his last World Cup.

Leave Babar at 3, although I think he really needs to wake up now because he’s fast falling behind and the blame game on Aqib/Hesson etc isn’t going to work anymore. His own method is useless. Same with Rizwan. Agha should be batting ahead of him for sure.
 
I'm all for integrating players. But the plan has to be to actually integrate them and hope they do well to become part of the side in the future. I know we haven't played a huge amount of ODI cricket, but since the last world cup these are the players who have played for Pakistan.

1773658255223.png

Is it really fair to Akif, Sufyan, Faisal Akram, Hassan Nawaz, Saud Shakil ( even Khushdil) to have played so little? What assessment or attempts to integrate them were made? You can add Kamran to that list too. These guys don't even figure in squads anymore. I can't remember some of them too clearly but were they so bad that they have to be discarded not just from XI but from the squad entirely?

Integration and building depth can't just be buzzwords, there has to be some plan behind it and some continuity.
 
Too much Rona Dhona negativity about the series and the result. It's good we tried some young new players and the likes of Maaz Sadaqat, Saad Masood, Ghazi Ghori, Abdul Samad showed good signs in this series, they should be worked on with at the NCA, Domestic Cricket and the Shaheen's team.

Win or lose against Bangladesh, at the end of the day Bangladesh don't count. Apart from Pakistan, no other ICC member even bothered with their exit from the T20 WC.
 
I'm all for integrating players. But the plan has to be to actually integrate them and hope they do well to become part of the side in the future. I know we haven't played a huge amount of ODI cricket, but since the last world cup these are the players who have played for Pakistan.

View attachment 162908

Is it really fair to Akif, Sufyan, Faisal Akram, Hassan Nawaz, Saud Shakil ( even Khushdil) to have played so little? What assessment or attempts to integrate them were made? You can add Kamran to that list too. These guys don't even figure in squads anymore. I can't remember some of them too clearly but were they so bad that they have to be discarded not just from XI but from the squad entirely?

Integration and building depth can't just be buzzwords, there has to be some plan behind it and some continuity.

Agree.

Too much chopping and changing is never good. Need to give players lengthy runs.
 
I am more worried about the test series in England this August.

Are we really prepared for that? Have we done our homework?

Do we have the pacers and, more importantly, the batters to compete with England in England?

Should try to at least win one test.
They are not winning a test in England

I don't see it

Hope for better away series in Bangladesh and west Indies
 
Too much Rona Dhona negativity about the series and the result. It's good we tried some young new players and the likes of Maaz Sadaqat, Saad Masood, Ghazi Ghori, Abdul Samad showed good signs in this series, they should be worked on with at the NCA, Domestic Cricket and the Shaheen's team.

Win or lose against Bangladesh, at the end of the day Bangladesh don't count. Apart from Pakistan, no other ICC member even bothered with their exit from the T20 WC.
Fair enough. This series result needs to be taken with a pinch of salt, as you guys tried new players.
 
South Africa series

Saim
Fakhar
Maaz
Babar
Agha
Rizwan (last chance)
Amir jamal
Shaheen
Wasim Jnr
Rauf
Abrar
Rizwan is Pakistan’s Isreal. He is protected like the USA protects Israel.

He doesn’t have “last chances”.
 
Find the replacement keeper first... Then we can discard him like we did from T20s
Weve heard this “find the replacement” nonsense argument before haven’t we?

I’m not finding any replacement! Keep protecting him. Just like USA has an Isreal first policy; Pakistan cricket has a Rizwan first policy too.
 
Weve heard this “find the replacement” nonsense argument before haven’t we?

I’m not finding any replacement! Keep protecting him. Just like USA has an Isreal first policy; Pakistan cricket has a Rizwan first policy too.
Relax... We sidelined him from t20s... If he does not perform, he will get sidelined from ODI too... But you gotta have replacements there... Ghazi ghori??? LOL
 
Find the replacement keeper first... Then we can discard him like we did from T20s
Agree with this. Even as a fan, I am happy to discard Rizwan if team does not need him. in T20I I still don't think tullas like Harris, Azam or Usman are an upgrade; they are minnow level. In ODIs Pak needs to just push him down the order. 6 or 7 would be perfect for Rizwan. Keep in mind he is the best KEEPER we have. Harris lost us Asia Cup final with his keeping.
 
Agree with this. Even as a fan, I am happy to discard Rizwan if team does not need him. in T20I I still don't think tullas like Harris, Azam or Usman are an upgrade; they are minnow level. In ODIs Pak needs to just push him down the order. 6 or 7 would be perfect for Rizwan. Keep in mind he is the best KEEPER we have. Harris lost us Asia Cup final with his keeping.
Wait for usual excuses now... Wait
 
Loss shouldn't matter while attempting to expand the bench strength. But are these the best talents in pakistan?
A player must play a minimum number of first-class matches to be considered to play for Pakistan. It doesn't look right when a player who didn't play even 10 first-class/List A matches is picked to play ODI cricket for the national side. Saad Masood is such an example even though he is not a bad player.
 
A player must play a minimum number of first-class matches to be considered to play for Pakistan. It doesn't look right when a player who didn't play even 10 first-class/List A matches is picked to play ODI cricket for the national side. Saad Masood is such an example even though he is not a bad player.
Are they trying like England tried for Jacob Bethell. Even Vaughan was laughing at Ashwin for calling Jacob Bethell a generational talent before he made any of those international 100s. Bethell looks to have strong fundamentals
 
Are they trying like England tried for Jacob Bethell. Even Vaughan was laughing at Ashwin for calling Jacob Bethell a generational talent before he made any of those international 100s. Bethell looks to have strong fundamentals
Jacob Bethell is surely a great talent and he was not picked for the national side before he played a good number of first-class and List A matches.
 
A player must play a minimum number of first-class matches to be considered to play for Pakistan. It doesn't look right when a player who didn't play even 10 first-class/List A matches is picked to play ODI cricket for the national side. Saad Masood is such an example even though he is not a bad player.

Saad Masood is a classic example, you’re right. 4 List A games and he gets a Pakistan cap.

But I disagree with your assessment of him. I think he’s going not to last very long.

I know he scored a decent 38 (off 41 balls) and bowled ok ok (8 overs, 55 runs, no wickets) for a newcomer.

But his batting technique looked so mediocre - literally poking and prodding in an almost comic way - I was wondering how the heck did they permit him to get here.

Perhaps it was nerves, but I doubt it.
 
Pakistan have such a rich Test legacy. It would be a shame if they stop caring about Test.

Test is the ultimate format.


A honorable cricket lover or just honorable human would look at this Pak attitude towards Test and appreciate the attitude of Aus, Eng and Ind towards Test.

They are still fighting this loosing battle of keeping a dead horse(Test) alive with whatever they have.

But that would too hard for you admit. Your anti India lens hides all positive light shining from India and all you see are the negatives.


Be as it may, proud to be a follower and fan of ICT.
 
If they want a strong bench they need to withstand so many failures. If they are giong to react to each failure building a bench is next to impossible. As it is Pakistan players have steeper learning curve. They are not like India in LOIs. India did a complete revamp. No slump in their performance. They only got better. Pakistan has to do a lots and lots of experimentation to get anywhere close to producing a decent LOI team
 
Back
Top