Runner Up
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2011
- Runs
- 7,679
Geo News reporting it right now. He is talking about India vs. SL Semi Final which was won by SL.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
New Delhi: Former Indian cricketer Vinod Kambli on Thursday made the shocking allegation that he suspected that the 1996 World Cup Semi Final played between India and Sri Lanka was fixed. The visibly emotional cricketer made the statement while participating in a STAR News debate on ex-chief of ICC anti-corruption unit Paul Condon statement that in the 90s and in the following years all of cricket's leading countries were involved in fixing major matches.
Kambli said he was suspicious of the captain’s decision to field first even though batting was the norm after winning the toss in those days. India had lost the match against the Lankans who shocked the cricketing world by winning the 1996 World Cup. He added that he was the only batsman left on the crease and could not take the spectacle when the Indian batting order crushed like a pack of cards. The cricketer burst into tears as he recalled that he was removed from the team after the game.
“I cried because I thought I was robbed of a chance to do it for my country. The entire team hugged me. Most of us were crying, he recalled.” A visibly emotional Kambli went on to clarify that he had never betrayed his country.
Why isn't cricinfo reporting this?
Why isn't cricinfo reporting this?
Well didnt Azhar get caught after the WC? The toss was definitely fixed. the curator had told Azhar the pitch will turn square second innings, yet, he chose to bat second with Sri-Lankan attack having so many spinners. Even Jayasuriya was turning ball square
India-Sri Lanka WC semifinal may have been fixed: Kambli
New Delhi: Former Indian cricketer Vinod Kambli on Thursday made the shocking allegation that he suspected that the 1996 World Cup Semi Final played between India and Sri Lanka may have been fixed. A visibly emotional Kambli made the statement while participating in a STAR News debate on ex-chief of ICC anti-corruption unit Paul Condon's statement that in the 90s and in the following years all of cricket's leading countries were involved in fixing major matches.
Kambli said he was suspicious of the captain’s (Mohammed Azharuddin) decision to field first even though it had been unanimously decided that the team would bat after winning the toss. India lost the match against the Lankans who shocked the cricketing world by winning the 1996 World Cup.
He added that he was the main batsman left on the crease and could not take the spectacle when the Indian batting order crushed like a pack of cards. The cricketer burst into tears as he recalled that he was removed from the team after the game. “I cried because I thought I was robbed of a chance to do it for my country. The entire team hugged me. Most of us were crying, he recalled.” A visibly emotional Kambli went on to clarify that he had never betrayed his country.
It was one of India’s most heart-breaking defeats in ODI history with cricket pundits attributing the loss to Indian skipper Azharuddin for inviting Sri Lanka to bat. Skipper Mohammed Azharuddin and key batsman Ajay Jadeja were out without scoring. Both the players served ICC imposed ban for match fixing later. Mohammed Azharuddin was forced to retire later in his career because of his involvement in a match-fixing scandal
Kambli’s Contentions:
1) Why India chose to field despite the unanimous decision that India would bat in the event of winning the toss on a batting pitch?
2) Why batsmen were quickly falling on the other end inspite of the fact that he was holding out and telling them to go slow?
3) He says he still can’t fathom how six wickets fell within 22 runs. (That day's scoreboard)
Kambli's Account of Events:
I will never forget the 1996 match because my career ended after this and I was dropped from the game. I was stunned by India’s decision to field. I was standing on one side and on the other end my fellow batsman was telling me that we would chase the target. However, soon after they quickly got out one by one. I don’t know what transpired.
“Something was definitely amiss. However, I was not given a chance to speak and was dropped soon after. Our team manager at that time Ajit Wadekar was aware of everything. He had even written an article afterwards that Vinod Kambli had been made a scapegoat.
“We had been playing well during the entire World Cup and even defeated the likes of West Indies and Pakistan to reach the semifinal. Howver, his sudden exit from the game is bound to raise suspicion. Our openers were all set to bat, however, at the nick of time, we learnt we had to field. I got a huge shock after learning this.
“I cried because I thought I was robbed of a chance to do it for my country. The entire team hugged me. Most of us were crying, he recalled. It was not only Tendulkar and other cricketers' dream to win the Cup but mine too,” he added.
Sri Lanka won the first semi-final over India at Eden Gardens, Kolkata in front of a crowd unofficially estimated at 110 000. Chasing Sri Lanka's innings of 251 for 8, India had slumped to 120 for 8 in the 35th over when sections of crowd began to throw fruit and plastic bottles onto the field. The players left the field for 20 minutes in an attempt to quieten the crowd. When the players returned for play, more bottles were thrown onto the field and fires were lit in the stand. Match referee Clive Lloyd awarded the match to Sri Lanka, the first default ever in Test or One Day International.
At the fall of the 8th Indian wicket, sections of the crowd vented their disgust with the state of the match by setting fire to some areas of the stands and throwing fruit and waterbottles onto the field. The match was briefly stopped and when play was about to resume, the crowd again threw bottles at the deep fielders. The match referee stopped the game and the game was awarded to Sri Lanka by default.
Why isn't cricinfo reporting this?
Our openers were all set to bat, however, at the nick of time, we learnt we had to field. I got a huge shock after learning this.
Would like to see the dismissals again. Any video please
[utube]I3qyMwZA9dc[/utube]
[utube]I3qyMwZA9dc[/utube]
4:34
Damn it, Azharuddin's dismissal is just so clear. Bloody fixer
So we have to wait for another 16 years from SL player to confirm that 2011 final was fixed?
^ This @ Big Harvey.
Azhar asking India to bowl first in 1996 on minefield and Sourav asking Australia to bat first on flat track in 2003, two decisions may have cost India, 2 wcs.
Btw. Srilankan cricket was born that day.
[utube]I3qyMwZA9dc[/utube]
Yea man , we should have won 4 world cups by now![]()
Suspecting it may have been fixed is not the same as saying it was fixed. Unless he has actual evidence or can provide details of how he himself was approached by his captain or a team-mate for example, it seems to me to be a bit of a non-story.
As has already been pointed out, Azhar was later found out to be involved in fixing, so unfortunately it does cast doubt on pretty much any match that he was involved in, but the mere fact that India collapsed the way they did is not evidence of fixing. Pressure and the weight of expectation in a situation like that must have been immense, and it could simply have been too much for India to handle.
Yea man , we should have won 4 world cups by now![]()
And what's going to happen ? Soon this will be swept under the carpet and nobody will be brought to book by the authorities.
Whether this is true or not, Jadeja was definitely involved at some level. It pisses me off to think that he can actually now sit on TV and speak about a game he sold out on.
Suspecting it may have been fixed is not the same as saying it was fixed. Unless he has actual evidence or can provide details of how he himself was approached by his captain or a team-mate for example, it seems to me to be a bit of a non-story.
This quote should be preserved in the PP hall of laughter.
How does one question whether the fix was true or not yet in the same breath state Jadeja was definitely involved?
Are you for real or are you just severely retarded.
But then again, if you're for real, you must be severely retarded. And if you're severely retarded, you are for real.
There. You can have two seemingly polar situations in the same breath.
Now to simplify things. You'll have to excuse me, but try as I do, PP doesn't offer sign language as an option for communication. But anyway, here goes:
1. Me - "Whether this is true or not, Jadeja was definitely involved at some level. It pisses me off to think that he can actually now sit on TV and speak about a game he sold out on."
Jadeja was banned for match fixing. Which means he was involved in match fixing at some level or at least the Indian authorities found significant proof regarding his involvement.
Regardless of whether he was involved in fixing this particular game, he was still involved in match fixing; perhaps other games.
It therefore pisses me off that he's still allowed to voice his opinions on the game.
2. What's the PP hall of laughter. Is it something you've been awarded the keys to. You know, like the honorary keys to a city, for your continued contributions to retarded posts.
Much Love.....
Non sequitur.
Sorry, I ain't gay.
N_H, it follows perfectly. No harm in admitting you misread/misunderstood his post.
Follows perfectly? Hmmm. Did you look up the Latin translation one wonders.
Let me guess, you fall in the camp which demands evidence supporting fixing yet deep down accepts fixing is prevalent in cricket.
Instead of holding Bally Ho's hand, why not address some of the other points I have listed which Bally Ho ignored, conveniently? Or did you not follow my post?
Follows perfectly? Hmmm. Did you look up the Latin translation one wonders.
Let me guess, you fall in the camp which demands evidence supporting fixing yet deep down accepts fixing is prevalent in cricket.
Instead of holding Bally Ho's hand, why not address some of the other points I have listed which Bally Ho ignored, conveniently? Or did you not follow my post?
Whether this is true or not, Jadeja was definitely involved at some level. It pisses me off to think that he can actually now sit on TV and speak about a game he sold out on.
How does one question whether the fix was true or not yet in the same breath state Jadeja was definitely involved?
Sorry, but openers do not get ready to bat before the toss has happened. That quote itself lowers the credibility of his claims.
I think what he meant was that they would've seen azhar win the toss, and since he claims it had been decided that they would bat first, the openers might have gone in to get ready.
They might not have found out until after the post toss interview that they would be fielding.
Chillax my friend. Jadeja was banned for 5-years for his involvement in match-fixing. So it doesnt matter whether this game was fixed too or if Jadeja was involved in this particular fix. He is a certified match-fixer![]()