pakistan cricket fan
Tape Ball Star
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2015
- Runs
- 851
Aamir Sohail you have lost it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[MENTION=17315]Stewie[/MENTION]
Let's assume all of this is true. In a clean match, a team has to still play well to win that game. Adjusting to conditions is a common part of cricket and the opposition can really not claim that as an excuse for losing.
Which is why his statement about the Ireland-Pak game sounds unreasonable. What was Pakistan, a top international side, doing unable to handle some grass on a pitch?
You can adjust the conditions all you want, but so long as the players, umpires and toss are clean, it requires a team playing well on that day to win.
Probably you are referring to me. I have long believed that is the case.
[MENTION=131678]Madplayer[/MENTION]. Do you honestly believe ICC is an institution of high morals and integrity?
If that's the case, you have probably not studied their decisions in history. Starting from. It's colonial era beginnings, when England and Australia lorded over everyone to the time how Ireland, Scotland and Netherlands, Kenya were kept away from the elites table and yet Bangladesh giventest status because they beat Pakistan in 99. That's right. On the basis of one game only. When highly consistent and better sides were ignored. Kenya beat West Indies in 96 World Cup. Why were they not given test status.
The answer is profits. Bangladesh has much higher following, market analysis showed the game will generate more money than Pakistan in years to come and it is actually true now. How about the big three fiasco?
Global sports is not about the game anymore. It's a business. Like NFL, Soccer premier leagues, NBA, etc, etc. ICC is here to make money. Why do you think USA is on Cric info front page so often, despite the mismanagement at USACA, yet ICC is desperate to promote the game here? While a full test nation has not seen any tours for almost ten years now?
Everything is quantified, analyzed, statiscally checked and it all sticks. These minor manipulations can easily shift the balance of the games.
They knew getting Pakistan to the final would immediately save this dwindling tournament and get people to start watching ODIs again.
Call me paranoid delusional or whatever, but you have to admit there are often some very subtle variations in parameters which require explanation.
Lol and that is fine with me. You are entitled to your opinion as am I. Nothing will give me greater pleasure to see Pakistan beat India against all odds on Sunday. I would be over the moon, in fact.All the examples you have given are administrative decisions of ICC. Any documented proofs that they have manipulated match results? Did ICC cause rains as well to get India an easy match against BD?
Sorry but Yes, i will call you paranoid delusional just like Amir sohail who is the brand ambassador of delusional talks. I hope ICC or PCB sue him for his statement.
This is the last thing Pakistan team needed to hear before a big final. That they arent good enough to win a match on their own.
I never said ICC is fixing the result. Sometimes these decisions work and if not then it takes the other team to play reallly well. I don't know about Ireland Pakistan game. I don't think anyone saw that coming. But England vs Pakistan and Pakistan vs India at Mohali (typically green wicket and then you get a turner for the semi final) even the ball tracker went crazy that day.
Morgan was rightly annoyed. You would question such conditions too if you were in his place. It's a semi final. How many semifinals these days are played on used surfaces? In England of all places!
Like I said, it does not mean the result will go hundred percent the way intended but it means that 1. The under dog might win 2. The game will not be as one sided.
In either case ICC wins because viewership goes up and people talk about it. Let's face it, if it all went according to form book, and the semis were contested by India, England, Australia and South Africa and the same old
Monotonous setting of 300 plus targets being chased in the 40-odd overs, there would not have been so much excitement generated.
Bangladesh had to produce an upset and an India pakistan final is the icing on the cake. Now you and I are here talking about and so are so many other people. Social media is going crazy and come Sunday, viewership will break records.
If the tournament had proceeded according to the form book: with England vs Australia or India vs South Africa, in the final, this much hype would not have been generated. The tournament will be over in two weeks and completely forgotten in a week.
Just some thoughts, I understand if it sounds outlandish to most but hopefully you will at least aknowledge there are some sound arguments there and as it just so happens cooncidentally that Aamer Sohail in his outburst kind of supported this argument I had made a while back.
Thats very naive of you.
He clearly alluded to wins being handed over to Pakistan for some hidden reason. Perhaps to milk money from and IndoPak final.
I saw a clip of the video and Amir really looked angry, wonder what the real issue is. I have read some of Amir's others comment during CT and those comments really looked good where he was encouraging management to play players at the bench, so what has happend all of sudden?
Honestly after watching the clip I have almost already given up the final, gave me bad taste in mouth. This thread should never have been created in first place.
Ok I hear you. Even David Llyod is coping a lot of steam on twitter for saying that SF should always be played on a brand new pitch and not a used pitch. In fact India's pitch was a brand new one in Edgbaston where as Pakistan, played on the same pitch. I don't know why and it really doesn't matter coz they were the better team on that day by miles.
However, what i am not ready to buy is the fact that, id the conditions were made to suit Pakistan, then why does Pakistan have such a poor record in similar conditions in UAE? Yes a few changes in team alright, but the core is still the same - Amir, Azhar, Sarfaraz, Hafeez, Malik, Imad etc.
Pakistan brought out their A game end of story. England had not been tested against a gun bowling line up before that game.
His justification for his comments was even worse than what he said in the first place. He has managed to completely embarrass himself over the last two days.
Lol and that is fine with me. You are entitled to your opinion as am I. Nothing will give me greater pleasure to see Pakistan beat India against all odds on Sunday. I would be over the moon, in fact.
Has any ex-Pakistani player not gone down this route?
Any time mouths open, even if at the start it seems something one can behind, as time progresses it just slowly deteriorates.
I'm not sure any retired player who has opened their mouth in Pakistan is of any value at this point.
The timing is quite pathetic as well, and it is particularly disappointed because he is known to be a rare sane voice in Pakistan cricket. Sarfraz did the right thing by not "dedicating" the SL win to Miandad. The team needs to keep a distance from these folks.
I have seriously begun to think that there is something wrong with the culture in Pakistan because i dont see such bitter, mentally incompetent ex-players in any other country. Rameez raja, for all his flaws, is a true ambassador of Pakistani cricket who has upheld the integrity of Pakistan and portrayed Pakistan in a good light worldover.
Thats a hoax. Sarfaraz was never asked about miandad, neither did he mention miandad himself. This hoax was spread by gutter journalism in Pakistan. Sarfraz was simply asked if he would dedicate the win to anyone and he said no he wont.
Probably you are referring to me. I have long believed that is the case.
[MENTION=131678]Madplayer[/MENTION]. Do you honestly believe ICC is an institution of high morals and integrity?
If that's the case, you have probably not studied their decisions in history. Starting from. It's colonial era beginnings, when England and Australia lorded over everyone to the time how Ireland, Scotland and Netherlands, Kenya were kept away from the elites table and yet Bangladesh giventest status because they beat Pakistan in 99. That's right. On the basis of one game only. When highly consistent and better sides were ignored. Kenya beat West Indies in 96 World Cup. Why were they not given test status.
The answer is profits. Bangladesh has much higher following, market analysis showed the game will generate more money than Pakistan in years to come and it is actually true now. How about the big three fiasco?
Global sports is not about the game anymore. It's a business. Like NFL, Soccer premier leagues, NBA, etc, etc. ICC is here to make money. Why do you think USA is on Cric info front page so often, despite the mismanagement at USACA, yet ICC is desperate to promote the game here? While a full test nation has not seen any tours for almost ten years now?
Everything is quantified, analyzed, statiscally checked and it all sticks. These minor manipulations can easily shift the balance of the games.
They knew getting Pakistan to the final would immediately save this dwindling tournament and get people to start watching ODIs again.
Call me paranoid delusional or whatever, but you have to admit there are often some very subtle variations in parameters which require explanation.
I'm sorry if i offended you. Its just that i feel at this time, it was a very irresponsible statement to make. It sends out a very bad message to the team. You never hear Indian ex players say such things because if whatever Amir said is true, it must be true for india too who have such a big fanbase. But why is it the moral responsibility of Ex Pakistani (mentally short) players to belittle the performances of their own players and "expose" ICC's plot? Why did this tool never say this when India used to get advantages during tournaments?
I have seriously begun to think that there is something wrong with the culture in Pakistan because i dont see such bitter, mentally incompetent ex-players in any other country. Rameez raja, for all his flaws, is a true ambassador of Pakistani cricket who has upheld the integrity of Pakistan and portrayed Pakistan in a good light worldover.
As much as I personally felt extreme dislike for Aamer Sohail making those bitter comments about Sarfraz and lying about press conference, as well as downplaying the resilience shown by this young Pakistan side (which is shameful), I gotta admit that in this entire thread, [MENTION=17315]Stewie[/MENTION] seems the only one to be making a weird sense out of the most integral part of what Aamer said (i.e facilitators).
I never said ICC is fixing the result. Sometimes these decisions work and if not then it takes the other team to play reallly well. I don't know about Ireland Pakistan game. I don't think anyone saw that coming. But England vs Pakistan and Pakistan vs India at Mohali (typically green wicket and then you get a turner for the semi final) even the ball tracker went crazy that day.
Morgan was rightly annoyed. You would question such conditions too if you were in his place. It's a semi final. How many semifinals these days are played on used surfaces? In England of all places!
Like I said, it does not mean the result will go hundred percent the way intended but it means that 1. The under dog might win 2. The game will not be as one sided.
In either case ICC wins because viewership goes up and people talk about it. Let's face it, if it all went according to form book, and the semis were contested by India, England, Australia and South Africa and the same old
Monotonous setting of 300 plus targets being chased in the 40-odd overs, there would not have been so much excitement generated.
Bangladesh had to produce an upset and an India pakistan final is the icing on the cake. Now you and I are here talking about and so are so many other people. Social media is going crazy and come Sunday, viewership will break records.
If the tournament had proceeded according to the form book: with England vs Australia or India vs South Africa, in the final, this much hype would not have been generated. The tournament will be over in two weeks and completely forgotten in a week.
Just some thoughts, I understand if it sounds outlandish to most but hopefully you will at least aknowledge there are some sound arguments there and as it just so happens cooncidentally that Aamer Sohail in his outburst kind of supported this argument I had made a while back.
Aamir Sohail has anger management issues. Does anyone remember when he was a commentator for Ten Sports and he had an argument on-air live with an Aussie? Most people don't remember it...it was a long time ago (I think 2003). The guy is a loose canon.
You don't owe me anything and I am not contesting the timing of his statement.
Sometimes it's very difficult to get your point across on cyber space. I never said whether Sohail should have said what he said or agreed with the timing of his statement. You can go back and reread this whole thread. I am puzzled as to what gave you that idea. I am just playing the devils advocate because I personally do believe there is some weight I what he said .
But NOT how and when he said it.
As someone who tries to be jaded about how rotten the world can be sometimes, I have to say my heart hurts to hear these comments from Aamir. Whatever his reasons, his excuses, his public religious convictions I don't know how some can say such hurtful things. It's not about match-fixing - that's a reputation that pakistan has earned well. It's just the optics of it all. Here is an eighth ranked team with all the systemic disadvsbtages that are well documented, making a fairy tale run in this tournament and this where Aamir's mind is? There is no bottom on Pakistan cricket, it seems.
Well PakPassion get a blog written from him, maybe we can get the matter cleared up?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/UVd3ps0n07">pic.twitter.com/UVd3ps0n07</a></p>— Shakoor (@Cricwitter) <a href="https://twitter.com/Cricwitter/status/876092745307361280">June 17, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
He's understood that it did not go down well and has since put out encouraging comments. Forgive and forget
LOL at the last comment tho, "he needs to in an asylum for goodness sake"
Impressive comments.
) I was hoping posters would watch the entire video to get to that last comment by the journalist
the journalist is sort of annoying but extremely funny)
He is wishing the team well, its unfortunate that he said those things in the heat of the moment, and they were caught on camera... which unfortunately means it will be replayed again and again, but atleast he is trying to be positive about the team and Sarfaraz.. I guess he should be forgiven
It's such an even bigger embarrassment for Aamir Sohail when even the parosi are telling you to grow a spine and speak sense when it comes to your team whilst supporting them, big big besti and Pakistan look really bad; Sohail has bought shame on his country.
In a recent video Sohail is backtracking on his comments and is stating that he said no such thing and that social media took everything out of context
Probably you are referring to me. I have long believed that is the case.
[MENTION=131678]Madplayer[/MENTION]. Do you honestly believe ICC is an institution of high morals and integrity?
If that's the case, you have probably not studied their decisions in history. Starting from. It's colonial era beginnings, when England and Australia lorded over everyone to the time how Ireland, Scotland and Netherlands, Kenya were kept away from the elites table and yet Bangladesh giventest status because they beat Pakistan in 99. That's right. On the basis of one game only. When highly consistent and better sides were ignored. Kenya beat West Indies in 96 World Cup. Why were they not given test status.
The answer is profits. Bangladesh has much higher following, market analysis showed the game will generate more money than Pakistan in years to come and it is actually true now. How about the big three fiasco?
Global sports is not about the game anymore. It's a business. Like NFL, Soccer premier leagues, NBA, etc, etc. ICC is here to make money. Why do you think USA is on Cric info front page so often, despite the mismanagement at USACA, yet ICC is desperate to promote the game here? While a full test nation has not seen any tours for almost ten years now?
Everything is quantified, analyzed, statiscally checked and it all sticks. These minor manipulations can easily shift the balance of the games.
They knew getting Pakistan to the final would immediately save this dwindling tournament and get people to start watching ODIs again.
Call me paranoid delusional or whatever, but you have to admit there are often some very subtle variations in parameters which require explanation.
Actually Amir Sohail has a media history post retirement which has been controversy free.
This came out of nowhere and is a result of wrong information fed to Amir Sohail.
In a Post match press talk Sarfraz was asked if he would dedicate the win to Birthday Boy Javed Miandad. At this Sarfraz said that He does not want to dedicate it to any one person because than issues get created.
Probably Sarfraz did not hear the Birthday part otherwise I think he would have decided the win to Legend Javed on his Birthday.
Amir Sohail was fed with wrong information. He was told that Sarfraz said that No I won't dedicate the win to Javed Miandad because He criticises Me alot.
At this Amir Sohail reacted & over reacted. He should have seen the Press Talk video himself and than should have commented.
It was all Misunderstanding.
So people can go around randomly blaming national personalities of corruption and defaming their character, and later on just say it's a "misunderstanding"
Sorry brother, that's not how the world works. Sohail ran his mouth and made false claims, he needs to pay
Yeah it was whatever it was but you have to be responsible for your actions.
His comments were ill times and now he is in damage control mode. Khisyani billi khamba nochey. No use now.
I wonder what happens to this guy sometimes. Still the crazy angry young man of the 90s even at this age. Generally his analysis are very intelligent and I like to hear his views, but you have to think before you open your mouth and how you say some things, regardless of their nature.
I actually kind of believe what he said but the way he said it, With innuendo and bashed sarfaraz and the timing of the whole thing, well it just put us as a nation under bad light.
No amount of singing Justin Bieber " I am sorry" will fix it ��. That's a bad Sohail. Bad bad bad
So people can go around randomly blaming national personalities of corruption and defaming their character, and later on just say it's a "misunderstanding"
Sorry brother, that's not how the world works. Sohail ran his mouth and made false claims, he needs to pay
Actually Amir Sohail has a media history post retirement which has been controversy free.
This came out of nowhere and is a result of wrong information fed to Amir Sohail.
In a Post match press talk Sarfraz was asked if he would dedicate the win to Birthday Boy Javed Miandad. At this Sarfraz said that He does not want to dedicate it to any one person because than issues get created.
Probably Sarfraz did not hear the Birthday part otherwise I think he would have decided the win to Legend Javed on his Birthday.
Amir Sohail was fed with wrong information. He was told that Sarfraz said that No I won't dedicate the win to Javed Miandad because He criticises Me alot.
At this Amir Sohail reacted & over reacted. He should have seen the Press Talk video himself and than should have commented.
It was all Misunderstanding.
The guy wanted Sarfaraz to kiss his feet just because he was way elder to him.
As someone who tries to be jaded about how rotten the world can be sometimes, I have to say my heart hurts to hear these comments from Aamir. Whatever his reasons, his excuses, his public religious convictions I don't know how some can say such hurtful things. It's not about match-fixing - that's a reputation that pakistan has earned well. It's just the optics of it all. Here is an eighth ranked team with all the systemic disadvsbtages that are well documented, making a fairy tale run in this tournament and this where Aamir's mind is? There is no bottom on Pakistan cricket, it seems.
To be very honest I don't give a damn what sourav ganguly and harbajan singh says about Pakistan team but what they are talking about Aamer our cricket pundits over their comments is a disgrace.
[video]https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BydJIra3vO39eGtNQ3Q3V1BmME0/view?usp=drivesdk[/video]
How's that a disgrace? They're defending Sarfraz and the team!
Also why on earth where they interviewed there! They used a good angle to make the area look nice but it's a horrible place, just a 5 minute walk from Moor Street station. Oh well I guess!