What's new

Achilles' heel of Pakistan cricket: Opening batsmen

Titan24

Senior Test Player
Joined
Oct 19, 2016
Runs
25,094
Post of the Week
6
A good start gives an edge in every sport and same is the case with cricket. With ball in hand team tries to get early wickets while with bat it tries to produce big opening partnership in the process of giving a target or chasing one. A big opening partnership? Something which is not common in Pakistan cricket.

If we look at the history of Pakistan cricket, we see some legendary pacers, spinners as well as middle order batsmen. However, when it comes to openers the well rather seems dry other than Saeed Anwer who was a class of his own in and averaged 45.52 in tests and almost 40 in ODIs. Hanif Mohammad was also a legend of his era, he averaged almost 44 in tests and averaged 41.87 as an opener.

Other than Saeed Anwer who was the only one to average over 45, Hanif Mohammad and Shoaib Mohammad who were close to that there isnt much to show in the test opening department for Pakistan when we compare them to the openers produced by some other top cricketing nations. Also all 3 were from 2-3 decades ago. Majid Khan, Mohsin Khan, Sadiq Mohammad etc were decent but not exactly greats of cricket statistically.

In ODIs with the two new balls, flat wickets and field restrictions things have definitely improved in terms of stats with Fakhar and Imam being better than most we have seen in the last couple of decades post Saeed Anwer however, even here more impact against top sides is required from these two and they havent been able to establish themselves much in other formats and their performances have been pretty limited to ODIs.

On the contrary if we see other teams around in tests we see Hayden, Warner, Sehwag, Cook, Smith etc averaging 45-50 runs in the last decade or two. In terms of consistently creating impact in ODIs in last two decades, we see Ghilchrist, Hayden, Tendulkar, Rohit, Dhawan, Roy, Guptill, Gayle, Quinten De kock, Amla etc. While the only world class opener we were able to produce in recent times was Saeed Anwer who retired on 2003. Imam and Fakhar may give bit of hope in LOIs but in tests Pak is really struggling with openers averaging in 20s and new faces are being tried as well.

Yes good opening batsmen are not that common especially in tests but they are definitely not as rare as Pakistan cricket has shown.

Nobody can deny the great cricketing legacy of Pakistan but if there one thing that can be called the Achilles heel for Pakistan cricket it is the opening position. This has let down Pak cricket more often than not in crucial WC encounters to overseas tests. Good openers make a big difference in every format of cricket and all the successful teams we have seen in the past had strong opening pairs.

It can only be hoped that somebody from new crop of openers puts his hand up and become a world class batsman in the coming decade as again the history is repeating itself and the the only world class player we have is Babar Azam who plays in the middle order in ODIs and tests.
 
Last edited:
There is no magic which will put this right - something in our domestic cricket which isnt preparing batsmen for this role.
 
Except that in 2013 the middle order was much stronger and could post 500+ total.

That only happened in 2014-15 when Younis hit the last purple patch of his career against Australia and New Zealand in the UAE.

In 2013, we were losing Tests to Zimbabwe and getting shot for 40 in South Africa.
 
Openers doing ok so far in this match so there is hope.
 
Openers doing ok so far in this match so there is hope.

Definitely. They need to make the starts count regularly which we see from top openers currently and that is what makes you into a 40+ averaging opener in any format. I hope they do it here atleast and one of them go onto score big which is what the team requires.
 
The opening combination is the best you will get for a mediocre team like Pakistan. Imam is even worse and I personally do not think Sami Aslam can recover from averaging 12 at a strike rate of 25 in Australia. Personally, I've never seen a Pakistani batsman down under who was mentally shot as he was.

The only opener who has yet to be given an opportunity in test cricket but is spoken highly of, is Imran Butt.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Highest opening stands in Test cricket for Pakistan:<br><br>298 Ijaz Ahmed/Aamir Sohail versus West Indies at Karachi in 1997<br><br>278 Shan Masood/Abid Ali versus Sri Lanka at Karachi in 2019<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1208321272536555521?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 21, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Good openers set up games in the 1st innings as that's where test matches are won and lost, and I can't see these guys setting up many games in the 1st innings.
 
Couldnt have asked from openers in the 2nd innings. I hope Pak wins the match and partnership of both Abid and Shan turns out to be more memorable one.
 
Is there any light at the end of the tunnel? It is normally expected of decent sides to identify the problem and then do something about it..
 
Is there any light at the end of the tunnel? It is normally expected of decent sides to identify the problem and then do something about it..

Unfortunately not much light in sight currently. The only options for now are to either go for openers who might not be the conventional "See the new ball" ones but, can possibly leave an impact on a good day or a make shift opener out of technically decent and performing middle order batsmen. As conventional openers which are technically correct arent available to us currently.
 
Last edited:
Imam is better than both.

M. Wasim will make colorful charts and face PowerPoint presentations to tell us that he is not ready for Test cricket, but then he picks Imran Butt, persists with Abid Ali and selects Abdullah Shafique in the 20 man squad who has only played 1 FC game.

Imam gives people stomach ache but the reality is that sooner or later, people will accept with a heavy heart that he is the best opener in Pakistan in both Tests and ODIs.

Haider Ali has good potential but he has a long, long way to go before he can be ready for this level.

Imam has underperformed in Test cricket so far but he is averaging 50+ in ODIs and has the temperament to occupy the crease and absorb pressure.

Many times he has kept his head when others around have been throwing their wickets in a heap.

He did that on his Test debut as well in Ireland when Pakistan looked like bottling a tricky 4th innings chase in overcast conditions and against Irish bowlers who were swinging the ball miles.

He is the finest batting prospect to emerge out of Pakistan over the last 3-4 years after Babar.

He needs to be backed because he has the ability average 40 Test cricket over the long run. His ceiling is quite high, and he is already averaging 50+ in ODIs.

Pakistan will waste time with the likes of Masood, Butt, Abid etc. but will not persist with someone who clearly has more upside than all of them.

This parchi nonsense needs to end as well. He has proved with his performance in ODIs that he deserves selection on merit. It is not his fault that he is Inzamam’s nephew.

Pakistan is a bankrupt cricket nation in terms of talent and Imam is one of the best players we have got. We will learn this the hard way after going through a dozen inferior options before finally settling on him.

He will be the long-term opener in both Tests and ODIs. It is inevitable. The sooner we accept this reality, the better it will be for both Imam and Pakistan.
 
Imam is better than both.

M. Wasim will make colorful charts and face PowerPoint presentations to tell us that he is not ready for Test cricket, but then he picks Imran Butt, persists with Abid Ali and selects Abdullah Shafique in the 20 man squad who has only played 1 FC game.

Imam gives people stomach ache but the reality is that sooner or later, people will accept with a heavy heart that he is the best opener in Pakistan in both Tests and ODIs.

Haider Ali has good potential but he has a long, long way to go before he can be ready for this level.

Imam has underperformed in Test cricket so far but he is averaging 50+ in ODIs and has the temperament to occupy the crease and absorb pressure.

Many times he has kept his head when others around have been throwing their wickets in a heap.

He did that on his Test debut as well in Ireland when Pakistan looked like bottling a tricky 4th innings chase in overcast conditions and against Irish bowlers who were swinging the ball miles.

He is the finest batting prospect to emerge out of Pakistan over the last 3-4 years after Babar.

He needs to be backed because he has the ability average 40 Test cricket over the long run. His ceiling is quite high, and he is already averaging 50+ in ODIs.

Pakistan will waste time with the likes of Masood, Butt, Abid etc. but will not persist with someone who clearly has more upside than all of them.

This parchi nonsense needs to end as well. He has proved with his performance in ODIs that he deserves selection on merit. It is not his fault that he is Inzamam’s nephew.

Pakistan is a bankrupt cricket nation in terms of talent and Imam is one of the best players we have got. We will learn this the hard way after going through a dozen inferior options before finally settling on him.

He will be the long-term opener in both Tests and ODIs. It is inevitable. The sooner we accept this reality, the better it will be for both Imam and Pakistan.

If hes so good, let him dominate for one season in FC. I mean the quality is real low in domestic cricket right? Surely if Imam is so talented he can top the run chart.
 
We have no good openers for Test Cricket. There is not open opener in domestic who deserves the opening slot as of now.

For the time being Pakistan need to shift Azhar to open, and maybe try Faheem as the second opener once Imran Butt is given a fair run. This way Rizwan can be shifted down to # 7 , and we can 2 of Saud Shakeel, Usman Salahuddin, and Kamran Ghulam to the middle order.
 
If hes so good, let him dominate for one season in FC. I mean the quality is real low in domestic cricket right? Surely if Imam is so talented he can top the run chart.

He is already averaging 50+ in ODI cricket and has scored big hundreds. The likes of Butt, Abid and Masood cannot manage that.

Imam has shown he can handle international level bowling attacks. Sure he might not be scoring big runs against the best attacks, but few players in the world do and he is not in their league.

For a terrible team like Pakistan with no talent, he is more than good enough.

The jump from ODI cricket to Test cricket, especially for someone of his playing style, is more manageable than asking an inferior player from domestic cricket to make the jump to international cricket.

The cupboard is empty and Pakistan does not have options. Instead of wasting everyone’s time, they should accept the reality and simply persist with Imam and let him adjust to Test cricket.

Unless Pakistan takes a left-field approach and open with Azhar and Shafiq and bring in another middle-order batsman like Saud, which they won’t have the courage to try, selecting Imam is the only option.
 
He is already averaging 50+ in ODI cricket and has scored big hundreds. The likes of Butt, Abid and Masood cannot manage that.

Imam has shown he can handle international level bowling attacks. Sure he might not be scoring big runs against the best attacks, but few players in the world do and he is not in their league.

For a terrible team like Pakistan with no talent, he is more than good enough.

The jump from ODI cricket to Test cricket, especially for someone of his playing style, is more manageable than asking an inferior player from domestic cricket to make the jump to international cricket.

The cupboard is empty and Pakistan does not have options. Instead of wasting everyone’s time, they should accept the reality and simply persist with Imam and let him adjust to Test cricket.

Unless Pakistan takes a left-field approach and open with Azhar and Shafiq and bring in another middle-order batsman like Saud, which they won’t have the courage to try, selecting Imam is the only option.

Then why cant he handle domestic low quality Pakistani bowlers?

Also Masood averages 57 in List A, and had a great Pakistan Cup tournament. He was only given 5 matches in ODI, and that too against Australia. Imam on the other hand started his career against Sri Lanka, played one match against New Zealand where "he got hurt", and then padded his stats against Zimbabwe, where he had 3 centuries.

For all we know if Masood was given a fair run in his best format, he might have done well.

Sahibzada Farhan and Khurram Manzoor also have better List A averages than Imam. He should count his luck that he got to establish himself against low quality teams, and now he has a spot in the ODI Team.
 
Pakistan did not persist with some of the openers who were pretty decent and would have matured further.

Yaseer Hameed , Toufiq Umar , Sami Aslam , all three were good.
 
As I said yesterday, its a perennial problem, we need to think outside the box. As our middle are mostly facing the new ball in most games, why not look at the best middle order batsman outside the team suited to opening. I would look for someone solid and technically right and shows some fight. How much worse for example would Usman Salahuddin be worse than Abid Ali or Imran Butt.
 
We have no good openers for Test Cricket. There is not open opener in domestic who deserves the opening slot as of now.

For the time being Pakistan need to shift Azhar to open, and maybe try Faheem as the second opener once Imran Butt is given a fair run. This way Rizwan can be shifted down to # 7 , and we can 2 of Saud Shakeel, Usman Salahuddin, and Kamran Ghulam to the middle order.

Wait, walk me through that logic once again.

Azhar goes to the opening slot: OK. Not sure if his current reflexes will allow him to sustain that role any better than his sporadic performances at No.3 but we have to make do.

Then you say promote a No.7/No.8 to... open? And the rationale being to place two of US, KG, SS in the middle order?

Isn't US a No.3 in domestics by nature? If so, would it not make sense to promote him to open instead?

That would still allow for the inclusion of SS (or KG if he can continue his patch).

Want to check if we are jumping the gun here a little bit.

I would not want to touch the positions of Rizwan, Faheem. Personally, I would not even want to tinker with Fawad's slot either. However, if we are to induct SS/KG into the side, Fawad may be up for promotion given experience. Added (potential) benefit being that if Babar moves to No.3 (which he may be better suited to given his counter attacking nature) we can have Fawad as a foil of sorts: stroke player and grafter at the crease instead of similar sort of players together.

This instead of having BA and SS bat together and get out in similar, hare-brained resplendent fashion.

Do not have much hopes from BA's child-like concentration span and club level ability against spin. The good thing is that he's discovered this reasonably early-ish into his career. Let's see what he makes of it.
 
Last edited:
Most teams Achilles' heel these days. Even India don't have a settled opening partnership yet. Unfortunately most top batsmen like to bat in the middle order instead of opening so this was always going to happen.
 
May be PCB should select the two best no. 3 batsmen to open the inning.By best I mean batsmen who have good defence and are technically correct.We need batsmen who can play for about 15 overs and not get out.
 
I knew those who laughed at Imran Farhat and Taufeeq Umar and Yasir Hameed would regret it.

And the one who could have been a steady opener for many years in Tests threw away his career.
 
Last edited:
The Achilles heel is the number 4 position right now. We need a solid batsmen in this position. Babar is unreliable. Harris failed here. Azhar is just about doing ok at 3.

Losing your Number 4 every time in the first 30-40 overs is very hard to deal with as a Batting unit. Fawad needs to move into 4 and Babar at 5
 
T

Sahibzada Farhan and Khurram Manzoor also have better List A averages than Imam. He should count his luck that he got to establish himself against low quality teams, and now he has a spot in the ODI Team.

Imam won man of the series in SA (2019), no other Pak opener has ever done that across the formats in SA if I am not wrong, scored a 100 in England as well (2019) and further he was the highest scorer for Pak in the poor Asia Cup (2018).

I think he has shown decent temperament for a 25 year old opener at international stage which obviously counts higher than List A cricket.

I am not saying he is the best thing since the sliced bread but, he is temperamentally strong which he has shown quite a few times in international cricket and when someone averages almost same in FC cricket as some other openers being tried except Abid along with being a proven performer in ODI cricket I think it definitely deserves more than 11 tests. Not to forget he didnt get to play as many matches in QAE 19 based upon which some got selected and no match in QAE 20 as well as he was travelling with Pak test squad before being told that he isnt actually a test player.

I have always been off the belief that in international cricket temperament is one thing which makes the difference at the end. You dont have to be to a technical genius to succeed but should know your game and olay within your limitations which requires strong temperament. Imam’s technique has issues but, I think they can be worked upon.
 
Last edited:
Wait, walk me through that logic once again.

Azhar goes to the opening slot: OK. Not sure if his current reflexes will allow him to sustain that role any better than his sporadic performances at No.3 but we have to make do.

Then you say promote a No.7/No.8 to... open? And the rationale being to place two of US, KG, SS in the middle order?

Isn't US a No.3 in domestics by nature? If so, would it not make sense to promote him to open instead?

That would still allow for the inclusion of SS (or KG if he can continue his patch).

Want to check if we are jumping the gun here a little bit.

I would not want to touch the positions of Rizwan, Faheem. Personally, I would not even want to tinker with Fawad's slot either. However, if we are to induct SS/KG into the side, Fawad may be up for promotion given experience. Added (potential) benefit being that if Babar moves to No.3 (which he may be better suited to given his counter attacking nature) we can have Fawad as a foil of sorts: stroke player and grafter at the crease instead of similar sort of players together.

This instead of having BA and SS bat together and get out in similar, hare-brained resplendent fashion.

Do not have much hopes from BA's child-like concentration span and club level ability against spin. The good thing is that he's discovered this reasonably early-ish into his career. Let's see what he makes of it.

Yes US plays as # 3 in domestic. There is an interview just posted where he says hes willing to open, so if he has no problem with it than i dont either.

However all 3 of US, KG, and SS, have higher first class averages than even Babar. So i personally feel its unfair to force them to open, when they have better stats than the people currently in the middle order, barring Fawad. However to reiterate that since US says he has no problem opening, then that should be fine in his case.

As far as Azhar most likely he wont be dropped, so its better for him to take one of the opening slots. You can argue that KG needs to dominate another season in FC to make it to the starting 11, but SS is ready. And he deserves that middle order spot more than Azhar.

Only reason i suggested Faheem as opener was to get 2 of US, KG, and SS in team, as we have not one good opener right now in domestic. If US opens no need for Faheem to move from #7 spot.
 
I knew those who laughed at Imran Farhat and Taufeeq Umar and Yasir Hameed would regret it.

And the one who could have been a steady opener for many years in Tests threw away his career.

Forget Sami Aslam. He was a timid batsman and clearly a timid person seeing as he ran away in the prime of his life from the not-even-that-difficult challenge of breaking into the national side. He wouldn't have pulled up any trees for Pakistan with his 30's from 150+ balls. Midget player.
 
Imam won man of the series in SA (2019), no other Pak opener has ever done that across the formats in SA if I am not wrong, scored a 100 in England as well (2019) and further he was the highest scorer for Pak in the poor Asia Cup (2018).

I think he has shown decent temperament for a 25 year old opener at international stage which obviously counts higher than List A cricket.

I am not saying he is the best thing since the sliced bread but, he is temperamentally strong which he has shown quite a few times in international cricket and when someone averages almost same in FC cricket as some other openers being tried except Abid along with being a proven performer in ODI cricket I think it definitely deserves more than 11 tests. Not to forget he didnt get to play as many matches in QAE 19 based upon which some got selected and no match in QAE 20 as well as he was travelling with Pak test squad before being told that he isnt actually a test player.

I have always been off the belief that in international cricket temperament is one thing which makes the difference at the end. You dont have to be to a technical genius to succeed but should know your game and olay within your limitations which requires strong temperament. Imam’s technique has issues but, I think they can be worked upon.

My issue with Imam in Test is that he needs to earn his spot by performing well in domestic FC. If he performs well in the next QAE tournament by all means he should be selected. However he should not play on potential. He needs to earn it.

As far as ODI he definitely deserves his spot, however he is lucky that he got to start his career off with matches in UAE, and then against Zimbabwe.

Look at what PCB did to US. They gave him one Test, that too in England. And 2 ODI, in West Indies. He had better stats than Imam. So in that sense he got lucky.
 
It would be an incredibly desparate move, but if bringing a 34 year old chacha into the bowling attack has worked then why not give Khurram Manzoor his nth call up?

He is the definition of TTF but has at least piled on the runs consistently in FC. It's also been a long time since he's stepped out in green colours. Sometimes batsmen mature in the twilight of their careers, and to be fair to Khurram he's shown no sign of slowing down. Could he be the stop-gap we need while we hope and pray someone comes through in domestics?
 
It would be an incredibly desparate move, but if bringing a 34 year old chacha into the bowling attack has worked then why not give Khurram Manzoor his nth call up?

He is the definition of TTF but has at least piled on the runs consistently in FC. It's also been a long time since he's stepped out in green colours. Sometimes batsmen mature in the twilight of their careers, and to be fair to Khurram he's shown no sign of slowing down. Could he be the stop-gap we need while we hope and pray someone comes through in domestics?

Not true. Khurram Manzoor has never really been a great FC opener, he's been a hugely dominant List A opener (the Fawad Alam of List A cricket).
 
I dont understand why some of our middle order which is littered with players queuing up to play cant play as openers

Some are practically facing the new ball anyway every innings

Pakistani batsmen need to get out of their comfort zones and put their hands up and take this opportunity with both hands
 
My issue with Imam in Test is that he needs to earn his spot by performing well in domestic FC. If he performs well in the next QAE tournament by all means he should be selected. However he should not play on potential. He needs to earn it.

As far as ODI he definitely deserves his spot, however he is lucky that he got to start his career off with matches in UAE, and then against Zimbabwe.

Look at what PCB did to US. They gave him one Test, that too in England. And 2 ODI, in West Indies. He had better stats than Imam. So in that sense he got lucky.

Fair points. My problem is that Imam was kept with the test side since Nov 2019 and he has played no test since then and subsequently didnt get much opportunity to play FC cricket as well so its like almost one and a half years of his development in red ball cricket have been wasted. Now he has been dropped from the side and has been told that he isnt a ready as red ball product so needs to go back to domestic cricket. I think he deserved the first oppurtunity when Shan was dropped as he remained with the squad since 2019, yes he was injured but based upon selection committee’s comments it looks like he isnt even in the red ball consideration as well currently which I think is unfair.

Agreed regarding Usman Salahuddin, there is no way you can select a player for one match and then drop him after. Thats was very poor from Inzi as a chief selector because, if you think a player is good you dont drop him only after one match and if you think that he isnt than dont select him at all. These customary selections of players for a match or two needs to end as it shows weak thought process from selectors.
 
Last edited:
Fair points. My problem is that Imam was kept with the test side since Nov 2019 and he has played no test since then and subsequently didnt get much opportunity to play FC cricket as well so its like almost one and a half years of his development in red ball cricket have been wasted. Now he has been dropped from the side and has been told that he isnt a ready as red ball product so needs to go back to domestic cricket. I think he deserved the first oppurtunity when Shan was dropped as he remained with the squad since 2019, yes he was injured but based upon selection committee’s comments it looks like he isnt even in the red ball consideration as well currently which I think is unfair.

Agreed regarding Usman Salahuddin, there is no way you can select a player for one match and then drop him after. Thats was very poor from Inzi as a chief selector because, if you think a player is good you dont drop him only after one match and if you think that he isnt than dont select him at all. These customary selections of players for a match or two needs to end as it shows weak thought process from selectors.

Yep. And this is why even though im not a fan of Imran Butt, i dont want him dropped from the team. He should be given some more matches.

thats true, if Imam was kept as the backup in the squad, he should have played when Shan was dropped, or he should have never been kept as a backup. I think that's more based on the new selector not wanting him, but PCB cant do this type of stuff.
 
He is already averaging 50+ in ODI cricket and has scored big hundreds. The likes of Butt, Abid and Masood cannot manage that.

Imam has shown he can handle international level bowling attacks. Sure he might not be scoring big runs against the best attacks, but few players in the world do and he is not in their league.

For a terrible team like Pakistan with no talent, he is more than good enough.

The jump from ODI cricket to Test cricket, especially for someone of his playing style, is more manageable than asking an inferior player from domestic cricket to make the jump to international cricket.

The cupboard is empty and Pakistan does not have options. Instead of wasting everyone’s time, they should accept the reality and simply persist with Imam and let him adjust to Test cricket.

Unless Pakistan takes a left-field approach and open with Azhar and Shafiq and bring in another middle-order batsman like Saud, which they won’t have the courage to try, selecting Imam is the only option.

What if he just can't make it in test cricket? Like Jason Roy cannot.
 
I think that Mohammad Wasim needs to swallow his doubts about Imam-ul-Haq and invest in him.

Beyond that I think he has to either promote Mohammad Rizwan or take the huge risk of investing in Abdullah Shafique in spite of his obvious incompetence against the short ball.
 
It would be an incredibly desparate move, but if bringing a 34 year old chacha into the bowling attack has worked then why not give Khurram Manzoor his nth call up?

He is the definition of TTF but has at least piled on the runs consistently in FC. It's also been a long time since he's stepped out in green colours. Sometimes batsmen mature in the twilight of their careers, and to be fair to Khurram he's shown no sign of slowing down. Could he be the stop-gap we need while we hope and pray someone comes through in domestics?

If I am not wrong, this thread is about test openers and you want Khurram Manzoor.

I think you don't follow domestic cricket at all as in this year's QA trophy his average was 21 as an opener.

Moreover, there is a difference between playing an oldie as a spinner and an oldie as an opener in tests. You must be aware of that difference.

Regarding Khurram, he has great list A record, could've been given a chance in ODis.

But in test.........No
 
Just for the sake of playing devil’s advocate, here’s another out of the box solution:

1. Babar Azam (c)
2. Azhar Ali
3. Saud Shakeel
4. Fawad Alam
5. Kamran Ghulam
6. Mohammad Rizwan (wk)
7. Faheem Ashraf
8. Hassan Ali
9. Yasir Shah
10. Nauman Ali
11. Shaheen Afridi

Not that I’m particularly attached to the idea of Babar opening, but the lineup looks so much more comfortable. Thoughts? I don’t think Babar’s suited to 4 anyways, 3 should be the natural position if he doesn’t open. But if he does...
 
Not that I’m particularly attached to the idea of Babar opening, but the lineup looks so much more comfortable. Thoughts? I don’t think Babar’s suited to 4 anyways, 3 should be the natural position if he doesn’t open. But if he does...

Babar has had a very mediocre test career so far which is miles off from his potential. He's already taken on the captaincy, opening in tests might serve to hamper him even more.

He's the closest we'll get to a 50+ averaging test batsman. He should continue to try and conquer the middle order rather than plug the gap at the top as makeshift opener and potentially rescind even more.
 
Back
Top