Eagle_Eye
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2010
- Runs
- 9,954
What?
The Ahmedis are worse off than the slaves in sindh?
You clearly didn't read the OP, or did it not quite fit in your narrative?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What?
The Ahmedis are worse off than the slaves in sindh?
You clearly didn't read the OP, or did it not quite fit in your narrative?
The Ahmedis are worse off than the slaves in sindh?
You clearly didn't read the OP, or did it not quite fit in your narrative?
I don’t have a device to quantify pain and suffering.
Just tell me what are trying to imply so that I can respond to you accordingly.
Obfuscation again.
It is what it says.... its couple of straight forward questions.
Going by the report....
Two non Ahmedis were riding a motorcycle and hit the chicken of an Ahmedi. Argument and then fight ensued, which took an even uglier turn and a place of worship firebombed. 6 Ahmedis got hurt, and 25 non Ahmedis hurt.
just going by the numbers.... Ahmedis seem to be on the attacking front.
you arent getting the point here
Ahmedi places of worship are an easy target. If Ahmedis werent involved then things could have been equally bad or worse but the religious angle would not have come so easily into the fray.
On the contrary, I’m saying that the two issues are very different to each other. The dynamics of both these issues are different. These two issues are of completely different nature. So I’m not going to even try and compare these two issues. I’m not going to grade the pain and suffering of the two. Off course you are free to draw your own conclusions, but please don’t tag me on it.
you arent getting the point here
Ahmedi places of worship are an easy target. If Ahmedis werent involved then things could have been equally bad or worse but the religious angle would not have come so easily into the fray.
Persecution is persecution.
Again the question is simple.
Are the Ahmedis better off or worse than the slaves in Sindh?
What religion or sect do those slaves in Sindh belong to?
Those slaves could be from any sects or religions of Pakistan such as sunnis, shias, ahmadis, christians or hindus?
The question is were they enslaved because of their sectarian or religious affiliation?
By comparing them with all ahmadis of Pakistan, you are comparing apples and oranges.
Are they not human beings?
Do you not see people as individuals or you into group identity?
Why is everyone so reluctant in answering the question:
Are the Ahmedis better off or worse than the slaves of Sindh?
Again you are deliberately being disingenuous.
The answer is obvious. Some ahmadis might be better off than the slaves of Sindh and some Ahmadis may even be among those slaves of sindh for that matter.
Secondly, bonded labour or slavery is not limited to Sindh. This curse exists in every province of Pakistan and those slaves include people of every sect and religion of Pakistan including Ahmadis
The only person being disingenuous is you. It's a very common Pakistani trait I see.... just muddle everything. Ahmadis are not part of the sindh slaves or anywhere else like you tried to conflate.
Please show us what evidence you have to state Ahmedis " might be" amongst the slaves of Pakistan.
They throw money at the poor of Africa to propogate, you think Ahmadis will let their own fall into slavery and possible leaving the group? Ahmedis have a register of all their people. They are far more organised than you are letting on.
The only person being disingenuous is you. It's a very common Pakistani trait I see.... just muddle everything. Ahmadis are not part of the sindh slaves or anywhere else like you tried to conflate.
Please show us what evidence you have to state Ahmedis " might be" amongst the slaves of Pakistan.
They throw money at the poor of Africa to propogate, you think Ahmadis will let their own fall into slavery and possible leaving the group? Ahmedis have a register of all their people. They are far more organised than you are letting on.
I don’t have a device to quantify pain and suffering.
Pakistan needs a mass education program to de-radicalize people from their irrational hatred of Ahmadis
Pakistan constitution does not consider Ahmedis as Muslims. So Ahmedis cannot bury their dead in Muslim graveyards. Change needs to come from the top. Bottom people are only following what they have been told.
A member of Pakistan's minority Ahmadiyya community was stabbed to death in the eastern town of Rabwah - officially known as Chenab Nagar - on Friday allegedly for refusing to chant religious slogans, a community activist and police said.
"The accused approached Naseer Ahmad, 62, an Ahmadi by faith and asked him to raise slogans of a party. On Ahmad's refusal, he repeatedly stabbed and killed him on spot," Saleem ud Din, a spokesman for the minority group, told Reuters.
The deceased, an active member of the community, was standing at a bus stop for his usual Friday ritual of paying his respects at a graveyard, Din said.
Read Suspected murderers of slain businessman arrested
"We are investigating the motive behind the murder, (the suspect's) links to any religious party has not been found yet," said Asad Rehman, a senior police officer in Chiniot district.
In May, a seminary student stabbed Abdul Salam, 33, a member of the Ahmadiyya community in Okara district, a community activist told Reuters.
Members of the Ahmadiyya community, who see themselves as an Islamic movement, have witnessed several incidents of violence in Pakistan.
Rights groups have expressed concerns about the persecution of the Ahmadiyya community and say the government has not done anything to protect its minority citizens.
Community leaders say legislative moves in 2018 and anti-Ahmadi rhetoric during the elections have entrenched legalized hate.
Express Tribune