Cpt. Rishwat
T20I Captain
- Joined
- May 8, 2010
- Runs
- 41,216
Yes I agree with it. Islam is expansionist, it is not a secret.So you agree with the assertion, and your only comment is that expansionism is a good thing. Fair enough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yes I agree with it. Islam is expansionist, it is not a secret.So you agree with the assertion, and your only comment is that expansionism is a good thing. Fair enough.
The core point was that islamists delegitimse muslims who are not into expansionism. So we are on the same page.Yes I agree with it. Islam is expansionist, it is not a secret.
Yes your core point is correct, Islamists deligitmise Muslims who are not into expansionism, Islam according to Islamists is for everyone. My addendum to your core point was that all major ideologies are expansionists be it capitalism, marxism, etc. So maybe we are on the same page with a sticky note attached.The core point was that islamists delegitimse muslims who are not into expansionism. So we are on the same page.
I find it interesting how use the word convert here. As if you are lower to someone who is born Muslim if you came back to Islam later in life. Sorry, but no. This is not the caste system of Hinduism.This I agree with, Pakistan with its financial and military might has a good chance of one day conquering Bharat.
P.S. My only doubt here is, it was the Mughals that conquered back in the day, not sure if the converts who are now in control can do what the Mughals did, but I remain optimistic.
100% of people who believed in this prophesy have passed away without seeing it fulfilled. But who is to deny the succour that belief provided them in their life time?But we will unite and rise again, that too was prophesied.
Who has been convicted of the murder of Muslims in India?Show proof/citations that RSS are above the law.
non sequitur. I asked to show proof that RSS are above the law. I can give many examples of RSS workers murdered by extremists.Who has been convicted of the murder of Muslims in India?
Because they instigate and get people killed and they don't get charged. Seriously mate, you need to get a life. If you believe the thugs are good people then get a mirror and have a good look at what you seenon sequitur. I asked to show proof that RSS are above the law. I can give many examples of RSS workers murdered by extremists.
And instead of answering you ask an unrelated question. There are many muslims who killed hindus and havent faced justice.
But the idol is not God in the temple. It's been made by man.Pran Pratistha = Infusing murti (idol) with pran (Life force). Its a ceremony to invite deity (God). Regarding Garbhgudi, please share references and which scriptures to be precise. They are 4 vedas which veda are you referring to? Gudi literally means temple.
It looks like you don't know what you are speaking. According to vedic rituals pran prathistha means consecration of a deity into a murthi. It's the invoking of nirghuna (formless ) to ghuna( form). Come back with valid references before we continue.But the idol is not God in the temple. It's been made by man.
But God does not live in a templeIt looks like you don't know what you are speaking. According to vedic rituals pran prathistha means consecration of a deity into a murthi. It's the invoking of nirghuna (formless ) to ghuna( form). Come back with valid references before we continue.
Make an effort to understand the concept of GOD in terms of Hinduism. These circular logic will not help move forward this conversation.But God does not live in a temple
Then why you so eager to respond and creaming yourself to have the last word. Kill your ego brotherMake an effort to understand the concept of GOD in terms of Hinduism. These circular logic will not help move forward this conversation.
Read Yajurveda 40.9, Yajurveda 32.3 and Bhagavadgita 7.20But God does not live in a temple
You have to have an deeper understanding of what Krishna is saying. The ultimate goal is liberation (Moksha) thats what Krishna means here. Your practices and sadhana should be for attaining Krishna (aka liberation). Earthly and materialistic desires will only take make you stuck in maya. Dissolving one self through devotion of (Form of Formless diety) is the quickest way to reach it.Read Yajurveda 40.9, Yajurveda 32.3 and Bhagavadgita 7.20
Lets see, you quoted me first and stated Vedic knowledge. Check yourself first.Then why you so eager to respond and creaming yourself to have the last word. Kill your ego brother
Where did I say idolatry is wrong? The above is you subjective opinion. Let's agree to disagreeYou have to have an deeper understanding of what Krishna is saying. The ultimate goal is liberation (Moksha) thats what Krishna means here. Your practices and sadhana should be for attaining Krishna (aka liberation). Earthly and materialistic desires will only take make you stuck in maya. Dissolving one self through devotion of (Form of Formless diety) is the quickest way to reach it.
"It has become a trite saying that idolatry is wrong, and every man swallows it at the present time without questioning. I once thought so, and to pay the penalty of that I had to learn my lesson sitting at the feet of a man who realised everything through idols; I allude to Ramakrishna Paramahamsa. If such Ramakrishna Paramahamsas are produced by idol-worship, what will you have — the reformer’s creed or any number of idols? I want an answer. Take a thousand idols more if you can produce Ramakrishna Paramahamsas through idol worship, and may God speed you! Produce such noble natures by any means you can. Yet idolatry is condemned! Why? Nobody knows." - Swami Vivekananda
Hmm there's nothing to see. You made a claim and I countered. If you're in disagreement, great that's what freedom of speech is.Lets see, you quoted me first and stated Vedic knowledge. Check yourself first.
This is a very poor analogy based on little understanding of history and simply based on Judeo-Christian and Islamic myths which were used to justify the iconoclasm of both Islam and Christianity.The essence of the Nazis lives through the israeli's of today, though.
Just like the essence of the pagans of ancient Iraq who opposed Prophet Abraham, pagan Romans who opposed Prophet Jesus and the pagan Arabs who opposed Prophet Muhammad lives through the pagans of India today.
Peace and blessings be upon all prophets of God, who preached to worship Him and Him alone.
You called RSS a terrorist org. You need to give proof of their ideological leanings. It is a Hindu Nationalist org, just like Muslim League was a muslim nationalist org. If you think this is like AQ, then that makes the founding party of Pakistan a terrorist org. Come on. If you say you hate RSS, I will understand. But if you use wrong words to describe them, then you have to apply it consistently across the board.Because they instigate and get people killed and they don't get charged. Seriously mate, you need to get a life. If you believe the thugs are good people then get a mirror and have a good look at what you see
Dude, give it a rest.You called RSS a terrorist org. You need to give proof of their ideological leanings. It is a Hindu Nationalist org, just like Muslim League was a muslim nationalist org. If you think this is like AQ, then that makes the founding party of Pakistan a terrorist org. Come on. If you say you hate RSS, I will understand. But if you use wrong words to describe them, then you have to apply it consistently across the board.
I am not seeking to convince him. I am showing everyone else to see the hollowness of this claims. If truth allows lies to be repeated without being challenged, the lies become truth in the eyes of the ignorant.Dude, give it a rest.
You are dealing with people who have been trained to parrot the same lines without knowing what they are talking about- RSS are terrorists, Modi is fascist, Hindutva is terrorism, yada yada yada, rinse and repeat.
Don't waste your time.
Because they instigate and get people killed and they don't get charged. Seriously mate, you need to get a life. If you believe the thugs are good people then get a mirror and have a good look at what you see
What RSS extremism? If anything RSS has been at the receiving end of extremists and its activists are murdered. But RSS is marching ahead in its vision of a a country where all religious life in harmony and are strongly rooted in indian culture.In your opinion .... What is the approx death toll due to RSS extremism in the last 10 yrs ? Just give me a number
I personally feel that demolition of the Mosque was wrong. If the court had passed a judgement first and then a Temple was built , it would have been correct procedure.Al Qaida needs to understand …..
Ram Temple is built as per the directions/orders given by Indian court after giving equal opportunities to both sides i.e. Hindus and Muslims
It’s not the case that BJP and Modi built Ram Mandir in one night by demolishing Babri Masjid like what Mir Baqi did in 15th century who built Babri masjid by demolishing Ram temple.
Also Supreme Court taken cognizance of Muslim side and allotted them place to built Babri Masjid in Ayodhya
That is a gimmick , you also know that very well.LOL. RSS has a muslim wing too.
No, the extremist muslims shame normal muslims for their opinions which does not follow the islamist agenda. They want to monopolize muslim opinion and thought.That is a gimmick , you also know that very well.
No, the extremist muslims shame normal muslims for their opinions which does not follow the islamist agenda. They want to monopolize muslim opinion and thought.
He said to respect Hindu religion. And glorify Hindu race and culture. Hindu religion and culture are different. Golwalkar said either adopt or respect Hindu culture. What's wrong in it?The non-Hindu people of Hindustan must either adopt Hindu culture and languages, must learn and respect and hold in reverence the Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but of those of glorification of the Hindu race and culture ... in a word they must cease to be foreigners; or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment—not even citizens' rights.
MS Golwalkar
This is stance of RSS on Muslims.
I personally feel that demolition of the Mosque was wrong. If the court had passed a judgement first and then a Temple was built , it would have been correct procedure.
Similarly Mir baqi who built Babri masjid by demolishing Ram mandir was also wrong…. Whether he taken any court or ppls verdict before demolishing Ram MandirI personally feel that demolition of the Mosque was wrong. If the court had passed a judgement first and then a Temple was built , it would have been correct procedure.
He said to respect Hindu religion. And glorify Hindu race and culture. Hindu religion and culture are different. Golwalkar said either adopt or respect Hindu culture. What's wrong in it?
what does this mean then? I know that you can speak English and your native language so you know what this means.in a word they must cease to be foreigners; or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment—not even citizens' rights.
Gowalkar was a product of his times and turmoil. Look at the statements of the present chief Bhagwat ( I don't like him as he is too left wing for my liking). He said muslims are equal citizens, but they should give up their claim of supremacy and learn to be equals. Also his quote: "If a Hindu says that no Muslim should live here, then the person is not Hindu. Cow is a holy animal but the people who are lynching others are going against Hindutva. Law should take its own course against them without any partiality."The non-Hindu people of Hindustan must either adopt Hindu culture and languages, must learn and respect and hold in reverence the Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but of those of glorification of the Hindu race and culture ... in a word they must cease to be foreigners; or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment—not even citizens' rights.
MS Golwalkar
This is stance of RSS on Muslims.
He was echoing the sentiments of his times. Same sentiment which Q-e-A said and Syed Ahmad Khan said. Cannot be seen in a vacuum.what does this mean then? I know that you can speak English and your native language so you know what this means.
in a word they must cease to be foreigners; or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment—not even citizens' rights.
please show me proof where QEA said this stuff. He was more into religious harmony than anybody could be at that time. Proof Please so I stand corrected?He was echoing the sentiments of his times. Same sentiment which Q-e-A said and Syed Ahmad Khan said. Cannot be seen in a vacuum.
India After Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy.please show me proof where QEA said this stuff. He was more into religious harmony than anybody could be at that time. Proof Please so I stand corrected?
Those are politically correct statements , the reality is different. We all know the reality , and lets not fool ourselves.Gowalkar was a product of his times and turmoil. Look at the statements of the present chief Bhagwat ( I don't like him as he is too left wing for my liking). He said muslims are equal citizens, but they should give up their claim of supremacy and learn to be equals. Also his quote: "If a Hindu says that no Muslim should live here, then the person is not Hindu. Cow is a holy animal but the people who are lynching others are going against Hindutva. Law should take its own course against them without any partiality."
Show me the quotes brother. Don't have much time to go through the whole book.India After Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy.
By Guha Ramchandra.
Its a matter of different eras. In those times there was No Internationally recognized boundaries , and no constitution. If Babar did that under this era , certainly he would have been wrong. When we are saying that the act was wrong , it is wrong according to constitution, which did not exist that time.Similarly Mir baqi who built Babri masjid by demolishing Ram mandir was also wrong…. Whether he taken any court or ppls verdict before demolishing Ram Mandir
So when Q-e-A talked about harmony they were politically correct statements? As the direct action day showed the reality? Right?Those are politically correct statements , the reality is different. We all know the reality , and lets not fool ourselves.
You mean to say constitution should ignore historical injustice? And count events happening only after the constitution was formed?Its a matter of different eras. In those times there was No Internationally recognized boundaries , and no constitution. If Babar did that under this era , certainly he would have been wrong. When we are saying that the act was wrong , it is wrong according to constitution, which did not exist that time.
Show me the quotes brother. Don't have much time to go through the whole b
First understand why we are saying act of demolition is wrong ? It is wrong because it is unconstitutional. So , if constitution did not exist , then the discussion on right and wrong also does not.You mean to say constitution should ignore historical injustice? And count events happening only after the constitution was formed?
Why do nations have truth and reconciliation commissions?
Looking about the quotation in wiki. "Golwalkar believed that people following Semitic faiths (particularly Muslims and Christians) must either adopt or respect Hindu culture, otherwise they do not deserve rights the citizen otherwise.what does this mean then? I know that you can speak English and your native language so you know what this means.
why is this so? Religious freedom is for everyone. You cannot force someone to adopt your religion or else you have no rights in that country. Is that right thing according to you?deserving no privileges, far less preferential treatment—not even citizen's rights."
You need a constitution to tell you what is right or wrong? I guess Israel should make a constitution and draw a line in the sand of time, that the status quo is the beginning and everything before that is pre historic. Lets see how many muslims agree to the novel ideaFirst understand why we are saying act of demolition is wrong ? It is wrong because it is unconstitutional. So , if constitution did not exist , then the discussion on right and wrong also does not.
The world was different that time. Can you apply todays morality and laws to yesterday ?
You are conflating religion with culture. You can follow whatever religion you want but respect or adopt native culture.why is this so? Religious freedom is for everyone. You cannot force someone to adopt your religion or else you have no rights in that country. Is that right thing according to you?
Not sure I fully understand your question.100% of people who believed in this prophesy have passed away without seeing it fulfilled. But who is to deny the succour that belief provided them in their life time?
So it may be comforting to you to have the belief, but eschatology is just mythology of the future.
It's much like Zaid Hamid believing in Ghazwa-E-Hind. He believes it will happen even if he doesn't live to see that day.Not sure I fully understand your question.
Lemme get it right before I answer. Are you asking that the prophecies don’t matter to you because of those who weren’t able to witness it come to fruition in their life time?
Unless your religion says to disrespect native culture which in the case violates your religious freedom.You are conflating religion with culture. You can follow whatever religion you want but respect or adopt native culture.
Looking about the quotation in wiki. "Golwalkar believed that people following Semitic faiths (particularly Muslims and Christians) must either adopt or respect Hindu culture, otherwise they do not deserve rights the citizen otherwise.
The non-Hindu peoples in Hindusthan must either adopt the Hindu culture and language, must learn to respect and hold in reverence Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but those of glorification of the Hindu race and culture — in one word they must cease to be foreigners, or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less preferential treatment—not even citizen's rights."
Asking to respect native culture or adopt is fine. Whats the problem with respecting native culture?
True CapBollywood apes western culture which is itself mostly populated by Abrahamic peoples and their culture.
He is Hindu, and he has the right to express his religious sentiments. He is saying all this while sitting in Pakistan because he has all civil rights. However, his views do not portray all Pakistani people.
You conveniently left out the part where he said to adopt or respect. Golwarker died in 1973, what are you even talking about?I would suggest that before asking Abrahamics to adopt or glorify hindu culture, first the nation's hindus themselves need to adopt and glorify hindu culture. Where is the evidence of it? Bollywood apes western culture which is itself mostly populated by Abrahamic peoples and their culture.
Case in point about Indians taking their cue from Hollywood:
Rishab Shetty says Bollywood is losing local touch due to 'too much western influence': Why are you trying that?
Kantara’s Rishab Shetty talks about the USP of his blockbuster and where he believes Bollywood is going wrong currently.www.hindustantimes.com
You conveniently left out the part where he said to adopt or respect. Golwarker died in 1973, what are you even talking about?
Bollywood is not Indian Cinema. It is part of Indian cinema.It might be popular overseas but Its a small section of film making industry. India has many film making states and recently Tollywood became the highest earning film industry. Tollywood pays utmost respect to Hindu culture right from black and white Ramayana movies era to latest Hanu-man movie (Super hero film based on Hanuman). The highest grossing film in India is Bahubali. It is a Tollywood movie with deep Hindu symbolisms. The recent RRR movie which won Oscar for its Natu-Natu song lifts some of its themes directly from Ramayanam. We grew up watching Mahabharath, Shivpuranas and Ramayan movies. Bollywood is infiltrated by leftist, liberals and coked up Mumbai elites. They are not even aware of common peoples sentiments.
Doesn't matter right?What is Tollywood? What is Kollywood? You are putting forward film industries which no one outside of Bharat has ever heard of. I am sure in their own locales they might be popular, but what's the chances of them selling out in cineplexes in Russia or Afghanistan?
If they call it Kollywood, I doubt that they ape the west too much.
Harmony in what ?So when Q-e-A talked about harmony they were politically correct statements? As the direct action day showed the reality? Right?
You need a constitution to tell you what is right or wrong? I guess Israel should make a constitution and draw a line in the sand of time, that the status quo is the beginning and everything before that is pre historic. Lets see how many muslims agree to the novel idea
I meant Bollywood. As I said I wouldn't know if Kollywood or Tollywood ape the west since I never heard of them before today.
You were more than eager to post Kollywood's actor opinion on Bollywood though. If you are not aware doesn't mean these industries aren't popular. They are not as popular as Bollywood. A tollywood movie recently got Oscar award and received standing ovation for its song number.I meant Bollywood. As I said I wouldn't know if Kollywood or Tollywood ape the west since I never heard of them before today.
Al Qaeda becomes relevent when they need to be for the benefit of the Western world. If you want an excuse to go attack a country or invade a state, just say they are in cahoots with Al Qaeda or ISIS.Question Al Qaeda still relevant? That should be the question.
Whats happened to the thousands of cells?Lol.
Now these lot sound like jokers but to be honest if this was 2007, I and most Indians would have been genuinely fearful of such a threat due to the presence of thousands of active Jihadi sleeper cells all across our country. But the NIA has done such a commendable job in 'pest control' over the last 15 years that our internal security is better than ever.
Lol.
Now these lot sound like jokers but to be honest if this was 2007, I and most Indians would have been genuinely fearful of such a threat due to the presence of thousands of active Jihadi sleeper cells all across our country. But the NIA has done such a commendable job in 'pest control' over the last 15 years that our internal security is better than ever.
I would have thought it would be nigh on impossible to stop terrorism if there was ever really any active jihad cells in your country. Bharati Muslims are by nature docile, even Bollywood films have always depicted them as such with their little topis and prayerful manner.
If you make films about Jihadis it would inevitably be evil Pakistan sending them over.
He will call himself BritishHow would you categorize "non Bharati" Muslims then? How would you categorize yourself for example in the foreign society you live in?
Correct answer.He will call himself British
Whats happened to the thousands of cells?
Well some are locked up as you'd expect and the rest (atleast most of them) are just civilians now minding their own literal businesses like selling vegetables and running meat stores while their 'connections' rot in our filthy prisons.
I would have thought it would be nigh on impossible to stop terrorism if there was ever really any active jihad cells in your country. Bharati Muslims are by nature docile, even Bollywood films have always depicted them as such with their little topis and prayerful manner.
If you make films about Jihadis it would inevitably be evil Pakistan sending them over.
You need to come out of your creepy obsession with Bollywood films, cap. I know, you might be longing for the 'back home' feeling out there on that gloomy island , but there are certainly more and better ways to get a feel of the motherland, other than Bollywood.
Watch ARY news prolly?
Seems a bit far fetched tbhWell some are locked up as you'd expect and the rest (atleast most of them) are just civilians now minding their own literal businesses like selling vegetables and running meat stores while their 'connections' rot in our filthy prisons.
Any sources to prove this round up of thousands of cells? Considering usually even a slightest of tensions between religious communities in Bharat results in riots where thousands of minorities get killed, you would think there would be headlines every day about this or that cell getting rounded up. With names of perpetrators and their links.
Seems a bit far fetched tbh