Sidilicious
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
- Runs
- 6,207
There is no definition of liberal? Thats a new for me.
Then please list exactly what are the traits of a liberal country and which country follow it exactly to the word.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no definition of liberal? Thats a new for me.
It doesnt matter if what action was required. You can ( Insert your favorite action here ) . If the visa officer wants me to dance before he grants me entry I have to abide by his request if I harbor thoughts of entering. No matter what action a country demands, you have to follow it to get a privilege.
Obviously the French didnt suffer.
What are we talking about here again? Whether the decision was justified or not given the ideologies France follows. Not about if they CAN but about if they SHOULD. Is this too hard to understand?
"Liberty is the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's behaviour or political views."Then please list exactly what are the traits of a liberal country and which country follow it exactly to the word.
She insulted their culture, they don't want people like that to be accepted as citizens. She demands respect for her religion and they demand respect for their culture.
We don't exactly know how far her extremism extends, she certainly has no regard for French culture.
Is this rule written in the joshila bible?
It was justified in their book because they clearly rejected her.
Is it justified in the eyes of Muslim brothers and sisters because they are upset that a supposed commandment of religion was not broken ? Definitely not.
Sorry are we talking about giving citizenship in western countries to muslim leaders who make laws in muslim countries? Or are we talking about muslim civilians who have no power on which rules exist in muslim countries?No its the way the world works and should be.
If you cannot respect someones right of liberty, why should it be offered to you?
Ever heard of multi-cultural societies. I thought Indians are champions in boasting about it when it suits them.Also, if you are not willing to mingle with my culture, then bye bye.
What makes you think she was insulting their culture? Without knowledge otherwise, I would assume not shaking hands has more to do with her own culture rather than anything to do with France. It might not be extremism either, for Algerians it could be just like putting on a hat when it's raining. I think you are reaching here to try to justify the decision, but it needs no justification, it's a question of assimilation in France and the judge decided she hadn't assimilated.
Of course that does raise other issues about assimilation, but I will leave that for another thread.
And to think...
All she had to do was to shake a small piece of flesh, moved on with her life for next 40 years as a French citizen and not worry about anything ever again.
The things religion makes a person do...
Sigh.
When someone extends their hand in friendship it is an insult to ignore them, it may not be in Islamic countries but it is in most western countries.
Yes it clearly is justifed in their book as we can see. Hence proven, they are hypocrites who claim to follow one thing but do the opposite. Thats all i wanted to say.
Everyone has different priorities I think we should respect that. For her she believes following religious edicts will win her favour with God. For others, doing a dance for the visa officer or shaking a small piece of his flesh would be more important. I don't see any wrong actions here, just different individuals with their own idea of what matters most.
Obviously the sanctity of her palm was more important for her than staying with her husband in france. She has got her priorities right. She couldnt be a good french citizen, at least she could be a good wife.
Yes it clearly is justifed in their book as we can see. Hence proven, they are hypocrites who claim to follow one thing but do the opposite. Thats all i wanted to say.
I am fine with such hypocrisy. When liberty is abused, when it is only take and no give, then liberty must be calibrated and terms and conditions applied. You call it hypocrisy, I see it as course correction.
An isolated case in which the government felt that not shaking the hand was lack of assimilation by their standards is hardly a cause for labelling a country hypocrite.
Its more of an exercise of power to reject those who they feel havent intermingled enough.
Nice euphemism for hypocricy.
A handshake was more important for French authorities than upholding the values they claim to stand for. A handshake was more important than allowing a husband and wife to stay together. They have their priorities right. They couldnt be good handshakers because she deprived them of it. At least they can be good hypocrites by claiming one thing and doing another.
Well that is my point, she is from an Islamic country so she might not have realised it could be seen as an insult. It certainly didn't mean she wanted to slaughter a cartoonist, at least not how I would interpret it.
Rather a lack of handshake emphasized her deficiency in failing to uphold the values they stand for.
A handshake was a gesture of welcome but clearly she couldnt care less as long as her Lord was happy.
The French prioritize handshakes, she prioritizes religion.
Why should she be given preference over the French?
No euphemism. I am fine with this hypocrisy. For example, if I say I am peaceloving and you come and slap me. I respond by slapping back. You can call me a hypocrite for not being what I claim and I am fine with that. Some benefits should only be extended to those who value it.
Its a handshake bro.![]()
Read this part of what you wrote again :
"The French prioritize handshakes, she prioritizes religion.
Why should she be given preference over the French?"
Do you realise how it sounds? Lol. She met every criteria except that handshake.
She upheld the French values of liberty and individual choice but we can clearly see which value the French themselves consider more important, liberty or . . . . A handshake.
Irrelevant comparisons. And glad that you are admitting that you are okay with hypocricy. And its fine. The country gets to decide its rule even if they are hypocritical and unethical.
It sounds even worse for you (as you attempt to defend it) when she refused to do that ‘Handshake’ that you are laughing about.
If she passed every single value, why did she get stuck at a handshake?
Again if French wanted a small handshake, why in the GOD’S world did her values fall short at that last step ?
yes I am ok with such hypocrisy and that is why I see no issue here. The French can say we allow everyone their own freedom and become full of people who pollute the french culture, or they preserve the french culture and be called hypocrites.
One person practicing his own culture doesnt mean polluting another person's culture. You drinking bhaang on Holi doesnt mean you are polluting muslim culture.
One person practicing his own culture doesnt mean polluting another person's culture. You drinking bhaang on Holi doesnt mean you are polluting muslim culture.
If she can’t even follow a basic courtesy a country is following and expecting from everyone why so desperate to move there?
Er. Because her husband is there?
Er. Because her husband is there?
Any country that seeks to ostracize a certain group from entering its borders, fails economically.
France is no exception.
It's not trying to ostracize a certain group, just a bunch of weirdos in said group.
Is this rule written in the joshila bible?
If it was about pleasing God, and God is as merciful as her religion claims, then I am sure the same Lord would not have hung her dry for shaking a hand or burned her in Hell for doing so.
But clearly thats another discussion, so ill leave it as it is.
I think you need to re-read my original post, I never implied she wanted to kill a cartoonist. My point was that it is still fresh in the minds of the French that several muslim extremists slaughtered some cartoonists and this is why they maybe a bit wary of muslims. In the meantime hundreds of muslims have been granted citizenship but she chose to display extremist tendencies during the ceremony and it ended up being to her misfortune.
The French do not routinely reject muslims from citizenship unless they are given reasons to do so.
No. This is calling out the hypocrisy. Muslim countries wont allow foreigners to follow their culture but want other countries to respect muslim culture. This type of hypocrisy is more and more being called out in the world. Deal with it.
There is no hypocrisy here. Muslim countries are the same as any other country, they all have certain protocols which need to be respected. The issue here was simply one of clarity. I myself was unaware that shaking hands was a necessary part of obtaining citizenship in France. It may be a new stipulation or a just this judge's personal rule which may now be adopted as a new standard.
No. This is calling out the hypocrisy. Muslim countries wont allow foreigners to follow their culture but want other countries to respect muslim culture. This type of hypocrisy is more and more being called out in the world. Deal with it.
A handshake is likely not part of a list of things requisite for French citizenship. However, refusing to do so raised adequate red flags for the judge to think that this woman wouldn't be a good fit into French society after all. I'm sure there are provisions in the law for a judge to exercise his or her subjectivity, as on this occasion.
May be she could have worn a glove or a mitten and shaken hands with the judge. No skin to skin contact and no guilty feeling.
They came to her country, the sense of entitlement Europeans have despite colonialism is absolutely appalling.
A handshake is likely not part of a list of things requisite for French citizenship. However, refusing to do so raised adequate red flags for the judge to think that this woman wouldn't be a good fit into French society after all. I'm sure there are provisions in the law for a judge to exercise his or her subjectivity, as on this occasion.
If French people intend to emigrate to Pakistan I would expect them to adopt local ways.
An easy solution, but she's probably spent so much of her life learning how to feel offended versus coming up with practical brainwaves that would actually help her day to day.
Back to Algiers she goes.
Which is what I said to joshila bhai, this is not a case of "Muslim countries wont allow foreigners to follow their culture but want other countries to respect muslim culture", but more a lack of clarity. Shaking of hands was probably not a requisite for citizenship so how would the woman know that the judge is going to exercise his subjectivity in that way? Understand, I am not criticising the judge's decision, merely pointing to the lack of clarity in such situations.
It still is on her, if I were to consider gaining citizenship in another country it would be my responsibility to do the research on the local customs and protocols of that country. It seems her husband is French so she would have knowledge of customs and rituals of the French people. It is up to the immigrant to make sure they understand how they will intergrate into the community and show they are willing and respectful.
I don't know about French people, but when Brits move abroad they usually just set up little British enclaves and form a little Britain in the sun. That's certainly true in Spain and the Gulf countries, although you would expect them to be sensitive to local culture as well.
How can someone call the West free, and then if one wants to practice their religion freely in the West, they should move else where?
.
If a person is so extreme in their religion that it overrides the local customs and laws then yes move elsewhere.
I think it was the judge who was offended in this case, not the woman.
I don't know about French people, but when Brits move abroad they usually just set up little British enclaves and form a little Britain in the sun. That's certainly true in Spain and the Gulf countries, although you would expect them to be sensitive to local culture as well.
First she got offended and then he got offended and off goes the plane.
Yes, I would certainly learn Spanish and strive to absorb the culture outside the Little Englander enclave.
I'm sure you would Rob, but obviously there are plenty who don't so we need to be mindful that we aren't expecting different standards from others than we do for our own.
French are generally racist and it's a trash nation. She's better of in Algeria where they wont force to shake hands with anyone.
The discussion is about France and French values.
Which race are the French racist against or is that just a throw away line to discredit the French.
Mostly agaisnt brown people from North Africa such as Morocans and Algerians. Black people have also been subjected to a lot of racism in France. Jews have suffered too. I've been to France many times, the people are rude, arrogant and certainly many are racist.
Mostly agaisnt brown people from North Africa such as Morocans and Algerians. Black people have also been subjected to a lot of racism in France. Jews have suffered too. I've been to France many times, the people are rude, arrogant and certainly many are racist.
Mostly agaisnt brown people from North Africa such as Morocans and Algerians. Black people have also been subjected to a lot of racism in France. Jews have suffered too. I've been to France many times, the people are rude, arrogant and certainly many are racist.
For her not shaking hand with a man is more important than being a french citizen. Hand shaking is in no way against any Islamic values. This is ridiculous of her to behave this way.
Berbers acting like salafi Arabs.
Mostly agaisnt brown people from North Africa such as Morocans and Algerians. Black people have also been subjected to a lot of racism in France. Jews have suffered too. I've been to France many times, the people are rude, arrogant and certainly many are racist.
In what way are they racist, I have been to France several times and never found any forms of racism. I did a study with a tourist outfit and intermingled with plenty of migrants and none expressed any problems with racism and were very happy with their lot in France. I'm sure you are familiar with the French pfttt, it took us days to finally get a response.
I dont see a problem with it but religion is a personal thing. If she felt it was against her religious values, we cannot judge. Sorry if I missed any earlier post of yours but do you think it's ok to refuse her for this reason alone?
Why have you been many times to France if it's racist and the people are rude? Just curious, but for me the people who live there are a big part of any experience abroad.
I have seen North African Berbers and Arabs being more racists to blacks and south Asians.
I enjoy travelling to Europe by car and the quickest route is via France through the tunnel. I now only stop if I need to, can't stand the people in general and the country isn't anything special either.
It's a country of 60 million. And guess how many tourists visit it each year? Another 60 million.
Those folks clearly think otherwise.
I didnt realise you have spoken to all 60 million French tourists, what a guy you are .
Im basing this on my experiences, the expriences of others who I have spoken to and what I have read in the media.
While you clearly have spoken to all 60 million residents. We make a nice team.![]()
France is only 25 kms from where I live. I go to Lauterbourg and surrounding areas every other week during the summer to fish. They are a very relaxed, laid back and casual people (more like the Italians, Spanish and Romanianas) unlike the Germans. Also once you pass the border you immediately realize you are in a laid back country especially after passing through the German border.
Do you find the French racist?.
They came to her country, the sense of entitlement Europeans have despite colonialism is absolutely appalling.