What's new

An open challenge to Indians, if all Muslim empires in sub-continent were barbaric then name even a single saint-like Hindu empire in entire history!

Cpt. Rishwat said:
Because you are here on a Pakistani site insulting the legacy of the Mughals. If you want to insult the Mughals on an Indian site then I think you will find yourself mostly free to do so without much reply.
Click to expand...

Nopes. We insult these tyrants everyday in our country. But pakistanis open threads on pp to cry about it.
 
Mughals and Turks are Pakistani heroes solely on the basis of religion. They will defend them and it’s no surprises even though these empires committed atrocities on the people of their region.

For non-Muslims of subcontinent, Mughals and Turkic invaders are barbaric. It will never change as I always believe that history cannot be changed.

As per OP, every empire and kingdom has its share of bloodshed. The difference is that it was the blood of the armies that fought was spilled. Common people would not be involved. The victor would rule the new land and its people. For them, it’s business as usual. The only difference is who they pay taxes to.

With Turks, there are no rules of war. Common people were slaughtered, villages and cities ransacked and properties looted. Women and children enslaved and the good looking ones would end up in some generals harem. All these things were unheard of in Indian subcontinent prior to 10th century.

Somebody’s hero is someone’s villain. People in India especially North and Northwest Indians will never forget the barbarians that battered their land for over 650 years. Nothing can change that.
 
Hitman said:
No, because he smacked Aurangazeb that way, who went crazy after hearing the news.
Click to expand...

I'm surprised Modi ji hasn't commissioned a Bollywood movie about this?

Can you provide a full detailed account or link to this? I huge fan of combat sports but never heard of bare knuckle grave fighting.
 
KingKhanWC said:
Have we got a name of this peaceful hindu Empire yet ? Seems to be a real struggle for our hindutva friends
Click to expand...
Every Hindu empire. So we don’t have to go and count.
Dharmic rules of war do not commit atrocities on people. Something alien to your heroes from Central Asia.🙄

If any Hindu or Buddhist ruler has committed atrocities on people, they will be considered tyrant. Not glorified like you know who.
 
Technics 1210 said:
I was going to say, Empires conquer land, India under the watchful eye of the cult, is losing land - and it's people.

This is some empire, 5000 years in the shadows.
Click to expand...

Is that why you and your felow minnions run away like gutless puzzies everytime us Indians chase you down in your own backyard on these topics ? :ROFLMAO:
 
KingKhanWC said:
Have we got a name of this peaceful hindu Empire yet ? Seems to be a real struggle for our hindutva friends
Click to expand...
Already replied though.

Peaceful and Empire doesn't go along together.

Hindu kings were peaceful so they couldn't built empire. Islamic rulers were opposite so one after another built an empire.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
You asked why Pakistanis counter hindutva propaganda and I told you. If you stop coming here to spread false narrative I doubt anyone would give that much thought to these topics.
Click to expand...
Exactly, these topics are started by the cult when all the while no one outside of India cares about Saffron, Phantom Hindu Empire, Kashmir, or even Tendulkar - we now only care about the invasion of Hindutva - the grandest terrorist threat of them all.

Indians seem to think the world cares about them, it is quiet the opposite, no one cared about them for 5000 years (except for the Muslims and British), as also seen by the millions of stateless Indians - heck even Indians born in India will testify to this fact!

Ignore the cult, they will disappear into the ether - don’t give Saffron terrorism the platform or attention it desperately desires - they were silent for 5000 years, and will be for the next 5000 years too.
 
LongHorn said:
Sambaaaaji or maybe Salsaji or Tangoji ?
Click to expand...
O here is your saint ruler acts
====

Sambhaji Maharaj's army committed several atrocities during their campaigns:

  • Sacking of Burhanpur (1681): The Maratha army plundered, looted, raped, and tortured the inhabitants of Burhanpur. This event was marked by extreme violence, unlike the practices of his father Shivaji

  • Invasion of Portuguese Territories: Maratha forces under Sambhaji invaded the Portuguese territories of Bardez and Salcette, where they looted, destroyed churches, and raped Christian women. Many captured people were sold to Arabs and Dutch

  • General Atrocities: Maratha soldiers were known for committing massacres and mass rapes during their campaigns, which overshadowed Sambhaji's military and administrative achievements
 
Technics 1210 said:
Exactly, these topics are started by the cult when all the while no one outside of India cares about Saffron, Phantom Hindu Empire, Kashmir, or even Tendulkar - we now only care about the invasion of Hindutva - the grandest terrorist threat of them all.

Indians seem to think the world cares about them, it is quiet the opposite, no one cared about them for 5000 years (except for the Muslims and British), as also seen by the millions of stateless Indians - heck even Indians born in India will testify to this fact!

Ignore the cult, they will disappear into the ether - don’t give Saffron terrorism the platform or attention it desperately desires - they were silent for 5000 years, and will be for the next 5000 years too.
Click to expand...


I feel this is why they make so much noise on Pakistan forums to be honest. They don't have the confidence to preach their attributes outside of South Asia.
 
Itachi said:
Already replied though.

Peaceful and Empire doesn't go along together.

Hindu kings were peaceful so they couldn't built empire. Islamic rulers were opposite so one after another built an empire.
Click to expand...

Beating up graves is being peaceful in Hinduism?

Let's start with this .
 
KingKhanWC said:
Beating up graves is being peaceful in Hinduism?

Let's start with this .
Click to expand...
I didn't understand. Can you explain which king or kingdom, time/era, context, location....?

These type of vague posts actually waste of time. Write what you want to write in an understandable manner so that the post itself become self explanatory.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
I feel this is why they make so much noise on Pakistan forums to be honest. They don't have the confidence to preach their attributes outside of South Asia.
Click to expand...
Yup. I have seen them try this on Western places (eg football ones) and they get shut down very quickly. Years ago they'd try this tactic of sneaking in nonsense about Pakistan and everyone would lap it up, but since Modi's antics last few years now the average Westerner is a bit more wiser.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Somebody tell pakistanis that fighting against invaders like the Mughals and Portugese and their tyranny was the duty of every native king.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
I feel this is why they make so much noise on Pakistan forums to be honest. They don't have the confidence to preach their attributes outside of South Asia.
Click to expand...



Pakistanis discuss India all the time and then have a problem when Indians post their opinion on Indian topics.
 
Pakistanis cannot handle the fact that Indians don't give a damn about their Minority and Racism cards.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
You asked why Pakistanis counter hindutva propaganda and I told you. If you stop coming here to spread false narrative I doubt anyone would give that much thought to these topic
Click to expand...

Pakistanis stop talking about India and Indians will stop coming here.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
I feel this is why they make so much noise on Pakistan forums to be honest. They don't have the confidence to preach their attributes outside of South Asia.
Click to expand...

They can't do this outside of PP. They may not last even 5 minutes. LOL. Will likely get trolled or banned.

PP is very friendly. They take advantage of it.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
I feel this is why they make so much noise on Pakistan forums to be honest. They don't have the confidence to preach their attributes outside of South Asia.
Click to expand...
Forget confidence, they simply do not have the knowledge. We have already seen their laughable attempts in explaining Hinduism, but instead are hellbent on Hindutva - a cult based on nothing but violence and retribution.

If these cult members were to spew the same nonsense they do on here out on the streets of the West, like email was invented when Sanskrit was in draft, they they'd be shot down.

They know this deep down, they know the moment they open their mouths, they will be booted out. They also know that no one actually respects India's, it's the money market that the world is interested in, not India.

Basically the cult cannot confess to being Indian let alone Hindu outside of saffron India. Such is the life of a citizen of the next up coming superpower.
 
Itachi said:
I didn't understand. Can you explain which king or kingdom, time/era, context, location....?

These type of vague posts actually waste of time. Write what you want to write in an understandable manner so that the post itself become self explanatory.
Click to expand...

Post 154, written by one our most devout Hindu friends on this forum. Pls explain this post
 
KingKhanWC said:
Post 154, written by one our most devout Hindu friends on this forum. Pls explain this post
Click to expand...
In the context of #154, the circumstances were not peaceful and it was chaotic time.

Can't see the relevance with the thread though. Shoot the point so that we can go the root rather than shooting here and there.
 
Itachi said:
In the context of #154, the circumstances were not peaceful and it was chaotic time.

Can't see the relevance with the thread though. Shoot the point so that we can go the root rather than shooting here and there.
Click to expand...
Itachi sorry to barg in but one could clearly see you are dodging the question.
 
The Bald Eagle said:
Itachi sorry to barg in but one could clearly see you are dodging the question.
Click to expand...
post #154 mentions Rajaram of Sinsini and plundering of Akbar Tomb.

But he was neither an emperor nor he had an empire nor he was even a king.

So what is the relevance to the thread?

All I can see is, there was a local leader who had skirmish with Mughals who also plundered Akbar tomb. What do you want to conclude from here in the reference of the subject of the thread?
 
Itachi said:
post #154 mentions Rajaram of Sinsini and plundering of Akbar Tomb.

But he was neither an emperor nor he had an empire nor he was even a king.

So what is the relevance to the thread?

All I can see is, there was a local leader who had skirmish with Mughals who also plundered Akbar tomb. What do you want to conclude from here in the reference of the subject of the thread?
Click to expand...
Ok so a local leader who JUST to appease Hindus concocted a religion deserved to be desecrated in his grave...Right and ask Hitman who brought it in discussion not the other ppl about its relevance to the thread premise.
 
Itachi said:
post #154 mentions Rajaram of Sinsini and plundering of Akbar Tomb.

But he was neither an emperor nor he had an empire nor he was even a king.

So what is the relevance to the thread?

All I can see is, there was a local leader who had skirmish with Mughals who also plundered Akbar tomb. What do you want to conclude from here in the reference of the subject of the thread?
Click to expand...

The Mughals were commiting atrocities on Jats. The jats had revolted.
Aurangzeb had Gokula, another Jat Chieftain killed by cutting off his limbs.

Rajaram of Sinsini retaliated by attacking Agra and destroying the tomb of Akbar.
 
The Bald Eagle said:
Ok so a local leader who JUST to appease Hindus concocted a religion deserved to be desecrated in his grave...Right and ask Hitman who brought it in discussion not the other ppl about its relevance to the thread premise.
Click to expand...

What was a Barlas doing in India in the first place?
 
cricketjoshila said:
Pakistanis stop talking about India and Indians will stop coming here.
Click to expand...

But Indians have always been here. That's how you know that Pakistanis are talking about India. :LOL:

I hate to keep pointing this out, but the problem is Indians reflect their govts hostile attitude towards Pakistan, so obviously you will be answered in the same coin. Problem is a lot of Indian posters are highly Islamophobic which fuels further conflict. If they were just critical of Pakistan govt or military they would probably get plenty of agreement from Pakistan posters.
 
The Bald Eagle said:
I think the cult here implies Hindutva not Hinduism...
Click to expand...
In light of this illuminating post, Let me have a blanket declaration that when during such discussion I shall never be calling Islam or Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and his teaching as being a cult or being implied as that.

My label of cult is only reserved for those who distort the original meaning of Islam to score their own political gains and win petty battles on the internet. Islam teaches respect for all religions but if anyone who leverages the teachings of Islam to sully or denigrate another religion he/she is a cultist.
 
Guys, as per reservations of some posters...we are putting restriction on the posts irrelevant to the thread from now on...so please either answer the thread premise or enjoy posting in other relevant threads. Thanks
 
Itachi said:
In the context of #154, the circumstances were not peaceful and it was chaotic time.

Can't see the relevance with the thread though. Shoot the point so that we can go the root rather than shooting here and there.
Click to expand...

Please do expand as to why these hindu rulers weren't peaceful In these circumstances? Do you feel its honourable to attack a grave ? Would you do it ?

This is regards the thread topic completely
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
But Indians have always been here. That's how you know that Pakistanis are talking about India. :LOL:

I hate to keep pointing this out, but the problem is Indians reflect their govts hostile attitude towards Pakistan, so obviously you will be answered in the same coin. Problem is a lot of Indian posters are highly Islamophobic which fuels further conflict. If they were just critical of Pakistan govt or military they would probably get plenty of agreement from Pakistan posters.
Click to expand...

No. I came across PP because while searching for some stats on SRT i found a PP thread.

On browsing through PP i saw that the place is PakPassion but is filled with threads about India and few Indian posters countering the disinformation.

The Govt of Indias hostile attitude reflect the people's mood. Not the other way around.

For Indians Kashmir is a unalienable part of India, pakistanis call the terrorists there as freedom fighters. So much so that Posters here get away with praising Ajmal Kasab and his acts.


Indian posters don't consider Muslims to be special. Something they are used to in Pakistan. Neither do Indians care about the Minority or racism card that gets played in the West. For us they are just another religious community. There are historical differences between the two communities which politicians have used.

Pakistan army was the holy institution on this forum for most, till they deposed imran khan and launched a brutal crackdown on democratic protests.

Indians are in full support of pakistanis in their efforts to get their right to have a government and ruler of their choice. A democratic Pakistan, free of establishment influence is the best bet for peace. So good wishes to all pakistanis.
 
KingKhanWC said:
Please do expand as to why these hindu rulers weren't peaceful In these circumstances? Do you feel its honourable to attack a grave ? Would you do it ?

This is regards the thread topic completely
Click to expand...

Why will the natives of the land accept a foreign ruler?

Why will they accept the tyranny of these rulers?

Why will they not retaliate when their leader is killed by dismemberment?
 
cricketjoshila said:
Why will the natives of the land accept a foreign ruler?

Why will they accept the tyranny of these rulers?

Why will they not retaliate when their leader is killed by dismemberment?
Click to expand...
Are you talking about Palestinians? If not then why so different reaction on modern day cruelty...not some century old stuff
 
cricketjoshila said:
No. I came across PP because while searching for some stats on SRT i found a PP thread.

On browsing through PP i saw that the place is PakPassion but is filled with threads about India and few Indian posters countering the disinformation.

The Govt of Indias hostile attitude reflect the people's mood. Not the other way around.

For Indians Kashmir is a unalienable part of India, pakistanis call the terrorists there as freedom fighters. So much so that Posters here get away with praising Ajmal Kasab and his acts.


Indian posters don't consider Muslims to be special. Something they are used to in Pakistan. Neither do Indians care about the Minority or racism card that gets played in the West. For us they are just another religious community. There are historical differences between the two communities which politicians have used.

Pakistan army was the holy institution on this forum for most, till they deposed imran khan and launched a brutal crackdown on democratic protests.

Indians are in full support of pakistanis in their efforts to get their right to have a government and ruler of their choice. A democratic Pakistan, free of army influence is the best bet for peace. So good wishes to all pakistanis.
Click to expand...

That is the biggest lie by a Hindutva who can’t defend genocide angaibat Muslims in other part of the world and Hindutva bigotry in India anymore.

The global south except Hindutva aren’t buying that cr*p anymore and you are losing your because you can’t have your way anymore.

Y’all going to need millions more online soldiers and even that won’t be enough.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Why will the natives of the land accept a foreign ruler?

Why will they accept the tyranny of these rulers?

Why will they not retaliate when their leader is killed by dismemberment?
Click to expand...

The claim is all hindu empires were peaceful .

Do you agree with attacking a grave and would you also do it and claim its peaceful?

As far as I'm aware a grave cant fight back?
 
KingKhanWC said:
The claim is all hindu empires were peaceful .

Do you agree with attacking a grave and would you also do it and claim its peaceful?

As far as I'm aware a grave cant fight back?
Click to expand...

The claim isn't that Hindus will not retaliate to violence and tyranny.
 
KingKhanWC said:
The claim is all hindu empires were peaceful .

Do you agree with attacking a grave and would you also do it and claim its peaceful?

As far as I'm aware a grave cant fight back?
Click to expand...

Got this from ChatGPT:

1. Maurya Empire (321–185 BCE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Chandragupta Maurya, Bindusara, Ashoka
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Chandragupta waged wars to establish the empire, defeating the Nanda Dynasty and later repelling Seleucid forces.
    • Ashoka’s brutal conquest of Kalinga (261 BCE) led to massive destruction, with reports of over 100,000 deaths. However, he later embraced Buddhism and non-violence.

2. Gupta Empire (c. 319–550 CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Samudragupta, Chandragupta II
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Samudragupta was called the “Napoleon of India” due to his aggressive military campaigns in northern and southern India.
    • Conquered numerous kingdoms, subjugating rivals through violence and warfare.

3. Chalukya Dynasty (543–753 CE, 973–1189 CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Pulakeshin II, Vikramaditya VI
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Defeated the Pallavas and fought against the Rashtrakutas and Cholas in violent campaigns.
    • Pulakeshin II successfully resisted Harsha’s invasion of Deccan.

4. Chola Empire (c. 9th–13th Century CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Rajaraja Chola I, Rajendra Chola I
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Conducted violent naval expeditions, conquering parts of Sri Lanka, the Maldives, and Southeast Asia.
    • Devastated the Sri Lankan capital Anuradhapura and waged war against the Western Chalukyas.
 
HalBass9 said:
Yea! Jews did not look like Polish ashekanazi Jews, they looked more like Palestinian.

Stop lying.
Click to expand...

Discussing Israel-Palestine with these ignorant Indians is a massive waste of time.

They have no skin in the game and they butt in with their ignorance.
 
sweep_shot said:
Got this from ChatGPT:

1. Maurya Empire (321–185 BCE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Chandragupta Maurya, Bindusara, Ashoka
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Chandragupta waged wars to establish the empire, defeating the Nanda Dynasty and later repelling Seleucid forces.
    • Ashoka’s brutal conquest of Kalinga (261 BCE) led to massive destruction, with reports of over 100,000 deaths. However, he later embraced Buddhism and non-violence.

2. Gupta Empire (c. 319–550 CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Samudragupta, Chandragupta II
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Samudragupta was called the “Napoleon of India” due to his aggressive military campaigns in northern and southern India.
    • Conquered numerous kingdoms, subjugating rivals through violence and warfare.

3. Chalukya Dynasty (543–753 CE, 973–1189 CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Pulakeshin II, Vikramaditya VI
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Defeated the Pallavas and fought against the Rashtrakutas and Cholas in violent campaigns.
    • Pulakeshin II successfully resisted Harsha’s invasion of Deccan.

4. Chola Empire (c. 9th–13th Century CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Rajaraja Chola I, Rajendra Chola I
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Conducted violent naval expeditions, conquering parts of Sri Lanka, the Maldives, and Southeast Asia.
    • Devastated the Sri Lankan capital Anuradhapura and waged war against the Western Chalukyas.
Click to expand...

Thanks, it seems hindu rulers killed more hindus than others
 
cricketjoshila said:
Now a Pakistani Muslim will decide how a Jew should look like.
Click to expand...

lol. Genetics study 😂

Since the other thread is about zelensky I’d reply here.

Yes! Everyone has the right to criticize anyone and everyone—I thought that was a basic understanding.

I haven’t criticized Hindus even once. My criticism is directed at Hindutva bigotry and bigots like yourself. Since you’re unable to defend Hindutva bigotry, you’re desperately trying to accuse anyone who criticizes Hindutva of attacking Hindus. That’s the only way your bigoted mind can justify your own prejudice. This kind of cowardly thinking is a common trait among bigots from every religious group.

As for ‘uppercut,’ he wants to reserve the right to slaughter humans over his beliefs. So tell me, in what circumstances in the year 2025 would that ever be acceptable to you? That is the criticism, not a suggestion that Muslims in India should publicly start eating steak. Interestingly, he has no issue shopping at grocery stores in America that sell it.

As I said, you’re desperate to spread and gain support for your bigotry. But unfortunately, no one with even a bit of sanity would support the idea of slaughtering humans over religious beliefs. And India is neither wealthy enough nor privileged enough to get away with it.
 
sweep_shot said:
Got this from ChatGPT:

1. Maurya Empire (321–185 BCE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Chandragupta Maurya, Bindusara, Ashoka
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Chandragupta waged wars to establish the empire, defeating the Nanda Dynasty and later repelling Seleucid forces.
    • Ashoka’s brutal conquest of Kalinga (261 BCE) led to massive destruction, with reports of over 100,000 deaths. However, he later embraced Buddhism and non-violence.

2. Gupta Empire (c. 319–550 CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Samudragupta, Chandragupta II
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Samudragupta was called the “Napoleon of India” due to his aggressive military campaigns in northern and southern India.
    • Conquered numerous kingdoms, subjugating rivals through violence and warfare.

3. Chalukya Dynasty (543–753 CE, 973–1189 CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Pulakeshin II, Vikramaditya VI
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Defeated the Pallavas and fought against the Rashtrakutas and Cholas in violent campaigns.
    • Pulakeshin II successfully resisted Harsha’s invasion of Deccan.

4. Chola Empire (c. 9th–13th Century CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Rajaraja Chola I, Rajendra Chola I
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Conducted violent naval expeditions, conquering parts of Sri Lanka, the Maldives, and Southeast Asia.
    • Devastated the Sri Lankan capital Anuradhapura and waged war against the Western Chalukyas.
Click to expand...
The most hilarious aspect in all of this is the 1st Hindu ruler embraced the non-violent Buddhism (after carrying out mass murder).

You just couldn't make it up.
 
HalBass9 said:
lol. Genetics study 😂

Since the other thread is about zelensky I’d reply here.

Yes! Everyone has the right to criticize anyone and everyone—I thought that was a basic understanding.

I haven’t criticized Hindus even once. My criticism is directed at Hindutva bigotry and bigots like yourself. Since you’re unable to defend Hindutva bigotry, you’re desperately trying to accuse anyone who criticizes Hindutva of attacking Hindus. That’s the only way your bigoted mind can justify your own prejudice. This kind of cowardly thinking is a common trait among bigots from every religious group.

As for ‘uppercut,’ he wants to reserve the right to slaughter humans over his beliefs. So tell me, in what circumstances in the year 2025 would that ever be acceptable to you? That is the criticism, not a suggestion that Muslims in India should publicly start eating steak. Interestingly, he has no issue shopping at grocery stores in America that sell it.

As I said, you’re desperate to spread and gain support for your bigotry. But unfortunately, no one with even a bit of sanity would support the idea of slaughtering humans over religious beliefs. And India is neither wealthy enough nor privileged enough to get away with it.
Click to expand...

Genetics like what?

All Muslims have the same genetics?

Your attempt to target a section of Hindus by giving them a separate name isn't going to work. The same tactics is used against the Jews. Try something new.

America isn't the homeland of Hindus and isn't the birth place of Sanatan. India is. Hence cow slaughter is banned here. Those who so much wanted to kill and eat cows were given a separate country in 1947.


Right now the world is suffering from killing in the name of one religion mostly. From USA to Europe to Australia to India and South East Asia, its mostly one religion and it isn't Sanatan.

India is so powerful that Your PM Imran had to resort to whining on twitter because no one bothered about Pakistan's views.
 
sweep_shot said:
Discussing Israel-Palestine with these ignorant Indians is a massive waste of time.

They have no skin in the game and they butt in with their ignorance.
Click to expand...

What skin does a Bangladeshi have?

The only time Bangladesh becomes relevant is when world population count is done.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Genetics like what?

All Muslims have the same genetics?

Your attempt to target a section of Hindus by giving them a separate name isn't going to work. The same tactics is used against the Jews. Try something new.

America isn't the homeland of Hindus and isn't the birth place of Sanatan. India is. Hence cow slaughter is banned here. Those who so much wanted to kill and eat cows were given a separate country in 1947.


Right now the world is suffering from killing in the name of one religion mostly. From USA to Europe to Australia to India and South East Asia, its mostly one religion and it isn't Sanatan.

India is so powerful that Your PM Imran had to resort to whining on twitter because no one bothered about Pakistan's views.
Click to expand...
That one religion has been targeted unjustifiably. They are fighting back. Wait until its your turn.
 
guard said:
That one religion has been targeted unjustifiably. They are fighting back. Wait until its your turn.
Click to expand...

Threats? Even tyrannical barbaric invaders could've scare my ancestors. Try this with those who get scared.

Unjustifiably targeted?

If you think you will scare people with threats of violence, you haven't seen what happens when people retaliate.
 
Post the original question (in the form of an image with the response included in the same image) that you asked ChatGPT that lead to this response below👇



sweep_shot said:
Got this from ChatGPT:

1. Maurya Empire (321–185 BCE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Chandragupta Maurya, Bindusara, Ashoka
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Chandragupta waged wars to establish the empire, defeating the Nanda Dynasty and later repelling Seleucid forces.
    • Ashoka’s brutal conquest of Kalinga (261 BCE) led to massive destruction, with reports of over 100,000 deaths. However, he later embraced Buddhism and non-violence.

2. Gupta Empire (c. 319–550 CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Samudragupta, Chandragupta II
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Samudragupta was called the “Napoleon of India” due to his aggressive military campaigns in northern and southern India.
    • Conquered numerous kingdoms, subjugating rivals through violence and warfare.

3. Chalukya Dynasty (543–753 CE, 973–1189 CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Pulakeshin II, Vikramaditya VI
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Defeated the Pallavas and fought against the Rashtrakutas and Cholas in violent campaigns.
    • Pulakeshin II successfully resisted Harsha’s invasion of Deccan.

4. Chola Empire (c. 9th–13th Century CE)​

  • Notable Ruler: Rajaraja Chola I, Rajendra Chola I
  • Violence & Warfare:
    • Conducted violent naval expeditions, conquering parts of Sri Lanka, the Maldives, and Southeast Asia.
    • Devastated the Sri Lankan capital Anuradhapura and waged war against the Western Chalukyas.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HalBass9 said:
lol. Genetics study 😂

Since the other thread is about zelensky I’d reply here.

Yes! Everyone has the right to criticize anyone and everyone—I thought that was a basic understanding.

I haven’t criticized Hindus even once. My criticism is directed at Hindutva bigotry and bigots like yourself. Since you’re unable to defend Hindutva bigotry, you’re desperately trying to accuse anyone who criticizes Hindutva of attacking Hindus. That’s the only way your bigoted mind can justify your own prejudice. This kind of cowardly thinking is a common trait among bigots from every religious group.

As for ‘uppercut,’ he wants to reserve the right to slaughter humans over his beliefs. So tell me, in what circumstances in the year 2025 would that ever be acceptable to you? That is the criticism, not a suggestion that Muslims in India should publicly start eating steak. Interestingly, he has no issue shopping at grocery stores in America that sell it.

As I said, you’re desperate to spread and gain support for your bigotry. But unfortunately, no one with even a bit of sanity would support the idea of slaughtering humans over religious beliefs. And India is neither wealthy enough nor privileged enough to get away with it.
Click to expand...

Talk to me directly by tagging me and I will most certainly give you blunt answers that you will never have the gall to respond to other than throwing tiny pebbles in the form of lame smilies hiding behind your fellow Jihadis on a anonymous online forum.

I have already answered your questions in multiple ways with the most recent one being an hour or so ago in the Hindutva thread ... but I will tell you this: You will NEVER EVER Respond to my pointed questions in that thread. Go ahead prove me wrong.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Threats? Even tyrannical barbaric invaders could've scare my ancestors. Try this with those who get scared.

Unjustifiably targeted?

If you think you will scare people with threats of violence, you haven't seen what happens when people retaliate.
Click to expand...
What are even on about??

You mention one religion causing problems.. i told you its being targeted unjustly… no one give a r@*s behind about your ancestors.

Where was my threat of violence..??!!

Seek treatment.
 
guard said:
What are even on about??

You mention one religion causing problems.. i told you its being targeted unjustly… no one give a r@*s behind about your ancestors.

Where was my threat of violence..??!!

Seek treatment.
Click to expand...

Not one religion. People of one religion.

Two separate things.

What do you mean by wait for your turn?

Yes my ancestors proudly fought for their religious beliefs against INVADING hordes. They weren't scared. Neither am I.

Those who were scared then are scared now.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Not one religion. People of one religion.

Two separate things.

What do you mean by wait for your turn?

Yes my ancestors proudly fought for their religious beliefs against INVADING hordes. They weren't scared. Neither am I.

Those who were scared then are scared now.
Click to expand...

Youre an immigrant from North of Bengal, something you mentioned, so I doubt they fought anything.

See the video I posted #211, an Indian exposes your nonsense. Hindu empires have been brutal, evil going on mass murdering rampages against fellow Indians. The problem with RSS ideology is not only it is extremist but denies the truth or is ignorant of reality and history.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Not one religion. People of one religion.

Two separate things.

What do you mean by wait for your turn?

Yes my ancestors proudly fought for their religious beliefs against INVADING hordes. They weren't scared. Neither am I.

Those who were scared then are scared now.
Click to expand...
I meant that currently Muslims are the ones being vilified, one day maybe it might be your community.

You are hindu, great, good for you, i have zero animosity against any religions (i speak for myself ok).

Scared people fight back. Its easy when your in the majority.
 
guard said:
I meant that currently Muslims are the ones being vilified, one day maybe it might be your community.
Click to expand...
They are already being vilified. In our school textbooks.

“There were two enemies of Muslims, the Englishmen and Hindus. Both of these were against the formation of Pakistan. On one hand, the Englishmen renounced the division plan of Hindustan, while on the other hand, Hindus were planning to occupy the entire Hindustan and enslave Muslims....”​
Urdu Textbook, Grade 7, Sindh Textbook Board, p.14​

 
cricketjoshila said:
No. I came across PP because while searching for some stats on SRT i found a PP thread.

On browsing through PP i saw that the place is PakPassion but is filled with threads about India and few Indian posters countering the disinformation.

The Govt of Indias hostile attitude reflect the people's mood. Not the other way around.

For Indians Kashmir is a unalienable part of India, pakistanis call the terrorists there as freedom fighters. So much so that Posters here get away with praising Ajmal Kasab and his acts.


Indian posters don't consider Muslims to be special. Something they are used to in Pakistan. Neither do Indians care about the Minority or racism card that gets played in the West. For us they are just another religious community. There are historical differences between the two communities which politicians have used.

Pakistan army was the holy institution on this forum for most, till they deposed imran khan and launched a brutal crackdown on democratic protests.

Indians are in full support of pakistanis in their efforts to get their right to have a government and ruler of their choice. A democratic Pakistan, free of establishment influence is the best bet for peace. So good wishes to all pakistanis.
Click to expand...

Regardless of when you joined PakPassion, Indians across all social media have been pushing hindutva reinvention of history since the first days of the internet, that is the only reason why Pakistanis end up talking about India. If the Indian propagandists left the site, you would find Indian talk dwindling to next to nothing, same as other Hindu nations like Nepal or Sri Lanka.

The BJP govt of India bases it's policy on it's RSS roots. This is not a party which follows the whims of the people, and you well know it.

The rest of your post is just anti-Pakistan rants which are not worth responding because they are not even based on reality.
 
Farhan The Man said:
They are already being vilified. In our school textbooks.

“There were two enemies of Muslims, the Englishmen and Hindus. Both of these were against the formation of Pakistan. On one hand, the Englishmen renounced the division plan of Hindustan, while on the other hand, Hindus were planning to occupy the entire Hindustan and enslave Muslims....”​
Urdu Textbook, Grade 7, Sindh Textbook Board, p.14​

Click to expand...
Wow what a garbage.

“Because the Muslim religion, culture and social system are different from non-Muslims, it is impossible to cooperate with Hindus.”

It certainly explains most of the ppers mentality.

It says in binary terms that u can't exist with others .Utter garbage to teach the kids .If it was said in madrassa, atleast it can be accepted. Teaching it in public schools depicts madness and religious bigotry on full display.
 
The Bald Eagle said:
Lol....do you know which jews are occupying Palestine these days....clue they are Zines and NOT from red sea region. Just search Ashkenazi Jews for yourself
Click to expand...

These Indians tend to be ignorant (probably deliberately) regarding Palestine-Israel.

One of them once wrote Israelis were getting lands legally. After that, I stopped discussing this topic with them.

It is like discussing mathematics with someone who believes 2+2=5.
 
Vikram1989 said:
Wow what a garbage.

“Because the Muslim religion, culture and social system are different from non-Muslims, it is impossible to cooperate with Hindus.”

It certainly explains most of the ppers mentality.

It says in binary terms that u can't exist with others .Utter garbage to teach the kids .If it was said in madrassa, atleast it can be accepted. Teaching it in public schools depicts madness and religious bigotry on full display.
Click to expand...
What do think your fellow countryman and co-religionist was going to bring. He has chatgpt Ai working overtime. His agenda peddling is getting tiresome.

Speak with hindus and christians who live here, not some Bala from surat.
 
KingKhanWC said:
Youre an immigrant from North of Bengal, something you mentioned, so I doubt they fought anything.

See the video I posted #211, an Indian exposes your nonsense. Hindu empires have been brutal, evil going on mass murdering rampages against fellow Indians. The problem with RSS ideology is not only it is extremist but denies the truth or is ignorant of reality and history.
Click to expand...

😂

You have no idea about Bengals history better not talk about it.

Your source is a random youtuber?
 
cricketjoshila said:
All Jews are Ashkenazi?
Click to expand...
As I said, you guys need to study first before becoming expert on Palestine issue.
====

The percentage of Ashkenazi Jews in Israel varies slightly depending on the source. In 2018, about 31.8% of Israeli Jews self-identified as Ashkenazi, with an additional 12.4% being immigrants from the former USSR, many of whom also identify as Ashkenazi1. Other estimates suggest that Ashkenazi Jews make up around 32% of the Israeli Jewish population3. A Pew Research report from 2016 indicated that about 45% of Israeli Jews identify as Ashkenazi

www.pewresearch.org

3. Identity

Overwhelmingly, Jews in Israel feel a strong sense of belonging to the Jewish people and are proud to be Jewish. Fully 93% of Jews say they are proud of
www.pewresearch.org www.pewresearch.org
 
cricketjoshila said:
😂

You have no idea about Bengals history better not talk about it.

Your source is a random youtuber?
Click to expand...

Its your post , you're an immigrant to india , now you're hating on other immigrants.

He is a hindu who provides sources not rants like yourself. Which parts has he wrong?
 
KingKhanWC said:
Its your post , you're an immigrant to india , now you're hating on other immigrants.

He is a hindu who provides sources not rants like yourself. Which parts has he wrong?
Click to expand...

Immigrant? Lol


He is a propogandist and random youtuber.

Get some proper source.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Bald Eagle said:
As I said, you guys need to study first before becoming expert on Palestine issue.
====

The percentage of Ashkenazi Jews in Israel varies slightly depending on the source. In 2018, about 31.8% of Israeli Jews self-identified as Ashkenazi, with an additional 12.4% being immigrants from the former USSR, many of whom also identify as Ashkenazi1. Other estimates suggest that Ashkenazi Jews make up around 32% of the Israeli Jewish population3. A Pew Research report from 2016 indicated that about 45% of Israeli Jews identify as Ashkenazi

www.pewresearch.org

3. Identity

Overwhelmingly, Jews in Israel feel a strong sense of belonging to the Jewish people and are proud to be Jewish. Fully 93% of Jews say they are proud of
www.pewresearch.org www.pewresearch.org
Click to expand...

Finally someone gives something to discuss about. I will get back to you with the rebuttal.

But for starters Ashkenazi Jews genetics have levantine genes. Don't they?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top