sensible-indian-fan
ODI Star
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2013
- Runs
- 35,587
- Post of the Week
- 3
The final answer will be known after a few years.
I think Kohli will eventually win.
I think Kohli will eventually win.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlike Kohli, Mathews bats with Kulesekara, Malinga, Herath and Thirimanne. Mathews bats under pressure knowing if he or the batsmen batting with him fall, SL's tail will be exposed.
Kohli is out of form, mathews is in form, of course this comparison is gonna be tilted in mathews favour at the moment....but kohli is a future ATG whereas mathews would dwindle away after his form is over ,so in the long run this is an absurd comparison
If that is the benchmark, then Misbah should be the best batsmen ever because he has a team of no-hopers around him for ages who fall like a pack of cards.
because Kholi is playing for IndiaWhy do you think that Kohli will become ATG and Mathews would dwindle ? What if Kohli crumbles and Mathews doesn't ?
The only reason anyone has given for saying Kohli will be a better test cricketer than Matthews is because he is Indian.
because Kholi is playing for India
The only reason anyone has given for saying Kohli will be a better test cricketer than Matthews is because he is Indian.
Even that is argued Mathews has the edge.Debate here is supposed to be which is better test batsman , not better cricketer.
Matthews >>>>>> overrated Kohli
It is context too Kohli has a lot of dead rubber runs when the series or game is dead and there is less pressure.How does an overrated guy have test centuries in almost every country he has played so far and also manages to hit an average of 50 plus while he chases games for fun In ODIs...
Honestly, the amount of delusion in this thread is breathtaking.
It's way too early for a comparison anyways, when Matthews averaging 20s in England and South Africa.
And here comes a guy saying Kohli is the one overrated.
It is context too Kohli has a lot of dead rubber runs when the series or game is dead and there is less pressure.
as i said earlier....still too early to compare ...at the moment mathews is looking good but kohli is still 25....he is too good a player to fail in test...he is an ATG material with 100s at perth jo'berg and NZ where as mathews averages in 20s in aus and sa(or eng..didn't check)It is context too Kohli has a lot of dead rubber runs when the series or game is dead and there is less pressure.
If you read my earlier posts i said on current form Mathews is better but i think Kohli will overtake him. Kohli is a special player but for me he hasnt lived up to his potential yet.as i said earlier....still too early to compare ...at the moment mathews is looking good but kohli is still 25....he is too good a player to fail in test...he is an ATG material with 100s at perth jo'berg and NZ where as mathews averages in 20s in aus and sa(or eng..didn't check)
He will be a very good test player. Don't know if an ATG or not but he might just be a late bloomer. Dhoni on the other hand is a fighter but his ghastly technique is always an impediment in tests.Matthews clearly better ATM. Kohli is going through a rut but will be back soon.
Haven't yet figured out if Kohli is a 50+ averaging batsman in tests though, he might end up like Dhoni, ATG at LOI level but much more inferior in tests.
He will be a very good test player. Don't know if an ATG or not but he might just be a late bloomer. Dhoni on the other hand is a fighter but his ghastly technique is always an impediment in tests.
Same mode of dismissals, lack of feet movement followed by repeated lapse of concentration..has been a thorough disappointment on the tour. While Mathews turned his test batting around on Eng tour, Kohli seems to have regressed, not focused on the field either. Someone needs to get him back on track before he totally destroys himself.
Unlike Kohli, Mathews bats with Kulesekara, Malinga, Herath and Thirimanne. Mathews bats under pressure knowing if he or the batsmen batting with him fall, SL's tail will be exposed.
If that is the benchmark, then Misbah should be the best batsmen ever because he has a team of no-hopers around him for ages who fall like a pack of cards.
Topic should be postponed till Mathews is without Mahela and Sangakara in near future and then we can come back to this debate,by which time I assume comparison will be more fairer between Captain Kohli and Captain Mathews Test Batting.
Right now it's Mathews , but he has an elite company which Kohli hasn't.
Err because he decimates attacks for fun in ODI's and averages 50 plus ? ( not to mention a part of some of epic inhumane chases).
Also a extremely good T20 player who paces his innings well...
What makes you think he will consistently flop in tests and be less than Matthews?
How does an overrated guy have test centuries in almost every country he has played so far and also manages to hit an average of 50 plus while he chases games for fun In ODIs...
Honestly, the amount of delusion in this thread is breathtaking.
It's way too early for a comparison anyways, when Matthews averaging 20s in England and South Africa.
And here comes a guy saying Kohli is the one overrated.
as i said earlier....still too early to compare ...at the moment mathews is looking good but kohli is still 25....he is too good a player to fail in test...he is an ATG material with 100s at perth jo'berg and NZ where as mathews averages in 20s in aus and sa(or eng..didn't check)
here's mathews performance after 26 tests and a couple of years agoHow can Mathews not continue this fine form? He's already averaging higher than Kohli. There's only two years difference with the added pressure of captaincy as well.
here's mathews performance after 26 tests and a couple of years ago
View attachment 47264
kohli already has 6 centuries and averages 42 after 26 tests....a couple of years make a lot of difference ....Kohli is a class act and a much better batsman as can be seen from the above stats....just because mathews hit a good patch doesn't make him a better player...kohli's class can be seen from his odi dominance and those runs have come at the top of the order
if he is batting lower down the order he should have more not outs and thus higher average....don't make excusesYou can make a case for top order but don't forget Mathews has been batting with the tail. Trying to shield them and farm the strike while also striving to get the maximum number of runs.
What makes you think Mathews can't continue his form? He's beasting WITH the captaincy. Somehow, it's just turned a switch or gear in his brain.
if he is batting lower down the order he should have more not outs and thus higher average....don't make excuses
...kohli is a prodigy (25 international centuries already).......mathews might be good enough for sri lanka...might even become srilankan great....by not continuing his form i meant won't be able to compete with kohli....he might still be good...this comparison is faulty at the moment cause he is in good form while kohli is not....comparing them at same age and same no. test gives you better idea
Wrong. Mathews turned his batting around in the UAE against Pakistan. He was player of the series and outscored every player on each side.
I love how you put Thirimanne into that list. Don't forget SL has a weaker tail in the Test format, where Mathews averages even more so Tests is his best format.
)
Mathews's captaincy is helped by Sanga and Mahela in the team. I don't see how they help with his batting. We're only talking about Test batting here.
We're talking about Tests. Like I said, you're talking about his limited overs accolades. Not all players are capable of transforming their ODI and T20 form into Tests.
Have you forgotten the knocks Mathews played for SL? If it weren't for him, the 1st Test would not have been a draw. He fought tooth and nail for it in tough conditions. It was one of the best knocks I saw from him since he took over captaincy. Then he hit a century in the 2nd Test to win SL the series. Mathews is a match winner. Kohli is not in this format.
How can Mathews not continue this fine form? He's already averaging higher than Kohli. There's only two years difference with the added pressure of captaincy as well.
Like it or not but all signs indicate that Mathews will continue to be a better Test Batsman than Kohli.
Kohli can score gazillions of tons in Odis but in the most challenging format of the game,. Mathewd is still the KING.
Kohli can score gazillions of tons in Odis but in the most challenging format of the game,. Mathewd is still the KING.
Like it or not but all signs indicate that Mathews will continue to be a better Test Batsman than Kohli.
Kohli can score gazillions of tons in Odis but in the most challenging format of the game,. Mathewd is still the KING.
If that is the benchmark, then Misbah should be the best batsmen ever because he has a team of no-hopers around him for ages who fall like a pack of cards.
I love how you put Thirimanne into that list. Don't forget SL has a weaker tail in the Test format, where Mathews averages even more so Tests is his best format.
How can Mathews not continue this fine form? He's already averaging higher than Kohli. There's only two years difference with the added pressure of captaincy as well.
4 innings, 2 of them in a drawn match, and suddenly, Matthews is the King.
Don't know why the king went missing in India, Australia and South Africa. He may well be improving, and may even go on to become a better Test batsman than Kohli. But the foundation of your logic to reach that conclusion is quite shaky.
And such type of threads usually pop up when one batsmen does well and the other has a little tough time. Why wasn't this thread popped up when Kohli hit a century against SA and Matthews was struggling?
That sums it up.
thivaakar;6988765[B said:]Mathews AVG in ODI would be MUCH more higher if he didn't bat low. [/B]Unlike Test where you have unlimited # of balls, In ODI you have to protect the wicket of you, tail and score at steady pace with sufficient # of balls you have left. Often Mathews ends up trying to score much runs as he can while batting before the tail starts collapsing and often he gets out cause he knows when pace man starts coming at 138+ all hell breaks lose at SL low order. If Mathews were to bat at # 3 or #4 his average would be in at least mid 40s. I'm not saying he will definitely be better than Kohli in ODI if he were to bat at top order, but saying his AVG would be muchhhh higher if he was to bat at top order.
Cause no one thought people could compare Mathews with Kohli and now you are able to.
People don't know much about Mathews. Mathews has been captaining SL U-15 since the age of 14ish. Probably not because of his leadership, but because of his all rounding ability(bowled around 85 MPH at the age of 15/16/17. Mathews dad is a coach, he owns a cricket academy and he was coached by his dad all his life. Mathews was meant to be a professional cricketer from day 1, unlike Sangakakra who played Tennis or Tharanga who was a fisherman or anything. This is why Mathews recent form isn't much of a surprise for many of us who knew Mathews.
More nonsesne . A lot of people would argue that batting lower down the order helps with avg with more opportnity stay Not out . isnt that the excuse given for Dhonis avg ? your only as good as your avg says , the rest is all excuse . Mathews is a good players , nothing beyond that . He neither has to technique or Talent to be a great player .
Then in an years time, it will not be a surprise for others too. Let him continue with his form. He has only shown the first real signs of being a capable batsman outside subcontinent.
For the less fortunate people like us who don't happen to know him and his family that well, we will treat him like we treat other Cricketers. 2-3 more successful away tours, and surely he will be rated a lot higher even by his critics. For now, he has failed everywhere he has been challenged as a batsman (England being an exception).
Err because he decimates attacks for fun in ODI's and averages 50 plus ? ( not to mention a part of some of epic inhumane chases).
Also a extremely good T20 player who paces his innings well...
What makes you think he will consistently flop in tests and be less than Matthews?
when was Kohli in form in Tests?
There have been numerous ODI legends who have failed to become top class test players, two completely different formats.
Kohli is lacking confidence and this is a lean period in his career after a pretty long period of sustained success. He has struggled with the ball swinging away from him in this series gone fishing a few quite a few timesTrue.
But do you see any inherent weakness that makes you feel he will flop?
I mean the guy has centuries in tests as well.
Now what are you basing your assumption on?
How much they avg in SA and Aus?Mathews is only second to De villiers when playing pace and Kohli can't touch Mathews in tests.
How much they avg in SA and Aus?
ThisThe final answer will be known after a few years.
I think Kohli will eventually win.
Come back from Kohli.
Mathews is only second to De villiers when playing pace and Kohli can't touch Mathews in tests.
3 test hundreds in Australia already.