Anyone at PakPassion who takes interest in the End of Times, especially Mahdi and Dajjal?

[RexRex]

I feel the relaxed policies of this forum and the more than welcoming and accommodating behavior of the MODS is emboldening a lot of hate speech and targeted uncalled criticism of Muslims and Islam as a faith by the bigoted Hindus here. I appreciate the more sensible Hindus who stand up to defend us at times, I want to make sure your efforts do not go unnoticed. But this is overall not a good dynamic to have here. We all have more in common than not. We can get along with our own faiths in place and show mutual respect rather than engaging in such frivolous crap.

Yeah I disagree, you are pretty thin-skinned. Some of the posters here are just asking questions and trying to pick holes in various arguments. Nothing wrong with that.

If you take that as hate speech, then that says a lot about you than them.

 

[Stewie]

Yeah I disagree, you are pretty thin-skinned. Some of the posters here are just asking questions and trying to pick holes in various arguments. Nothing wrong with that.

If you take that as hate speech, then that says a lot about you than them.

That is a mischaracterization. I see a lot of threads where the Muslims are directly being attacked and blamed for several challenges societies the world over face and somehow the effort is being made to make it look like we are responsible for them. There are so many examples of that on this forum, you only need look closely.You will see claims such as: Muslims in majority result in a downfall of a country. or look at what's going on Kashmir, BD, etc, etc,

Accuse me all you want about this and that but at least I am not disrespectful towards any faith here. I feel even you know the truth behind my post. I more than welcome a healthy debate if you want to stay within respectable parameters of my faith, which has been attacked a lot under the guise of atheism as well.

If I were to start picking holes in Hinduism, trust me I could do so with one hand tied behind my back and the result will be Swiss cheese. But I am respectful of other people's faith and don't want to mischaracterize something when I don't even know much about it.

 

[The Bald Eagle]

I love to debate on inter religious stuff but being disrespectful towards any religion makes the debate acrimonious.

 

[Stewie]

That is a mischaracterization. I see a lot of threads where the Muslims are directly being attacked and blamed for several challenges societies the world over face and somehow the effort is being made to make it look like we are responsible for them. There are so many examples of that on this forum, you only need look closely.You will see claims such as: Muslims in majority result in a downfall of a country. or look at what's going on Kashmir, BD, etc, etc,

Accuse me all you want about this and that but at least I am not disrespectful towards any faith here. I feel even you know the truth behind my post. I more than welcome a healthy debate if you want to stay within respectable parameters of my faith, which has been attacked a lot under the guise of atheism as well.

If I were to start picking holes in Hinduism, trust me I could do so with one hand tied behind my back and the result will be Swiss cheese. But I am respectful of other people's faith and don't want to mischaracterize something when I don't even know much about it.

.. as well as freedom of speech. Somehow that gives them license to say whatever they want. I understand there is a lot of repressed and historic anger towards Muslims

 

[Stewie]

I love to debate on inter religious stuff but being disrespectful towards any religion makes the debate acrimonious.

There is being disrespectful towards the faith and then there is mischaracterization of entire Muslims based on their faith due to certain issues, which we all know we face. I can understand if you want to bash those people or the guilty ones but blaming it all on the faith itself and inferring its all happening because of their faith is totally unacceptable.

 

[rpant_gabba]

Not worried one bit because I have firm faith in Bhagwaan.

When the end of times comes, he will rescue us.

You putting your faith in someone who orchestrated a war to end humanity.

 

[rpant_gabba]

That is a mischaracterization. I see a lot of threads where the Muslims are directly being attacked and blamed for several challenges societies the world over face and somehow the effort is being made to make it look like we are responsible for them. There are so many examples of that on this forum, you only need look closely.You will see claims such as: Muslims in majority result in a downfall of a country. or look at what's going on Kashmir, BD, etc, etc,

Accuse me all you want about this and that but at least I am not disrespectful towards any faith here. I feel even you know the truth behind my post. I more than welcome a healthy debate if you want to stay within respectable parameters of my faith, which has been attacked a lot under the guise of atheism as well.

If I were to start picking holes in Hinduism, trust me I could do so with one hand tied behind my back and the result will be Swiss cheese. But I am respectful of other people's faith and don't want to mischaracterize something when I don't even know much about it.

you make it sound it sound like it is an achievement. I did it as a 5th grader.

 

[Stewie]

you make it sound it sound like it is an achievement. I did it as a 5th grader.

It’s great to know. But once again completely off the mark and completely misses the point.

I bet you have had that problem from much further back than 5th grade.

 

[DeadlyVenom]

Wrong logic from you.

There were no Muslims in Mecca either. But Prophet is from Mecca. It was his home city.

Prophet was invited to Yathrib to arbitrate the internal squabbles between various groups. Can you show me evidence that he was asked to be their king or leader? Why would Jews appoint a Pagan Arab from Mecca to be their leader?

The Hadith talks about killing the Jews. Questions will be raised when a nation/race is specifically mentioned and what will happen to them at end times. I have already mentioned that if the Hadith had said "Enemies of Islam" or "Bad Guys", no one will have problem. When a specific group of people are mentioned, it will be open for criticism.

He was appointed by the people of Madina not by Jews. It's you who seems to be making an equivalence between Madina and modern Tel Aviv. You can't make historically false claims then use the falsehoods to decide what is right or wrong. You can see the constitution of Madina and read the history of how the Prophet was appointed leader yourself.

Again we have already established that the hadith doesn't state all jews, nor does it mean Jews as a race or nation ( as there are some ethnic Jews who are Muslim) so I think you are arguing for the sake of arguing.

 

[Champ_Pal]

He was appointed by the people of Madina not by Jews. It's you who seems to be making an equivalence between Madina and modern Tel Aviv. You can't make historically false claims then use the falsehoods to decide what is right or wrong. You can see the constitution of Madina and read the history of how the Prophet was appointed leader yourself.

Again we have already established that the hadith doesn't state all jews, nor does it mean Jews as a race or nation ( as there are some ethnic Jews who are Muslim) so I think you are arguing for the sake of arguing.

Show me evidence that Prophet was made the leader of Yathrib.

Its funny, you conveniently ignore that a non-local man goes to a different place and kicks out the people who have been living there for centuries. I don't want to get into Banu Qureza massacre.

 

[sweep_shot]

BJP Indians are trying to teach Muslims their own Islamic history.

Why do they try to be experts at everything?