That is a mischaracterization. I see a lot of threads where the Muslims are directly being attacked and blamed for several challenges societies the world over face and somehow the effort is being made to make it look like we are responsible for them. There are so many examples of that on this forum, you only need look closely.You will see claims such as: Muslims in majority result in a downfall of a country. or look at what's going on Kashmir, BD, etc, etc,
.. as well as freedom of speech. Somehow that gives them license to say whatever they want. I understand there is a lot of repressed and historic anger towards Muslims
There is being disrespectful towards the faith and then there is mischaracterization of entire Muslims based on their faith due to certain issues, which we all know we face. I can understand if you want to bash those people or the guilty ones but blaming it all on the faith itself and inferring its all happening because of their faith is totally unacceptable.
You putting your faith in someone who orchestrated a war to end humanity.
you make it sound it sound like it is an achievement. I did it as a 5th grader.
It’s great to know. But once again completely off the mark and completely misses the point.
Wrong logic from you.
There were no Muslims in Mecca either. But Prophet is from Mecca. It was his home city.
Prophet was invited to Yathrib to arbitrate the internal squabbles between various groups. Can you show me evidence that he was asked to be their king or leader? Why would Jews appoint a Pagan Arab from Mecca to be their leader?
The Hadith talks about killing the Jews. Questions will be raised when a nation/race is specifically mentioned and what will happen to them at end times. I have already mentioned that if the Hadith had said "Enemies of Islam" or "Bad Guys", no one will have problem. When a specific group of people are mentioned, it will be open for criticism.
Show me evidence that Prophet was made the leader of Yathrib.
This picture is doing the rounds on news outlets… Salman of Saudi Arabia with Epstein… these pics are from Epstein’s mansion.
Not the character you want to be seen around with in such a buddy buddy fashion especially.
sunnah.com
sunnah.com
Also should note, Islamic sources maintain that even if Dajjal does already exist, it doesn’t mean the trial associated with him should’ve already started as soon as he came to existence.. even if the boy above was Dajjal, the signs Dajjal himself mentions on where he was held would need to be fulfilled before he begins his prophesied agenda and at a time when Allah SWT has destined it.The boy suspected to be Dajjal (Ibn Ṣayyād) — what actually happened
Who he was
His name was Ṣāfī ibn Ṣayyād (often called Ibn Ṣayyād).
He was a young Jewish boy living in Madinah during the Prophet’s ﷺ lifetime.
Some companions suspected him because:
- he behaved strangely
- he made cryptic statements
- he claimed to receive “information”
- he showed signs of deception
This raised concern because the Prophet ﷺ had warned that Dajjal would appear before the Hour.
The Prophet’s ﷺ interaction with him
The Prophet ﷺ tested him — not to confirm him as Dajjal, but to expose false claims.
In Sahih Muslim:
- The Prophet ﷺ hid a verse from the Qur’an and asked Ibn Ṣayyād what it was
- Ibn Ṣayyād gave a partial, distorted answer
- The Prophet ﷺ replied: “Be disgraced — you cannot go beyond your rank.”
This showed he was not receiving revelation, only confused whispers.
Key point: The Prophet ﷺ never declared him Dajjal.
ʿUmar (raḍiyAllāhu ʿanhu) even asked permission to kill him — the Prophet ﷺ refused. From some sources He PBUH told him if he in fact is Dajjal, you can’t kill him only Isa Ibn Maryam PBUH can, and if he isn’t Dajjal, we don’t harm children.
Was Ibn Ṣayyād actually Dajjal?
No. Or at the very least he was suspected but at the time wasn’t proven to be.
Later narrations clarify this.
In Sahih Muslim, the Prophet ﷺ said:
- Dajjal is chained
- Dajjal will appear near the end of time
- Dajjal’s fitnah (trial) will be global
None of that applied to Ibn Ṣayyād.
Scholars unanimously conclude:
Ibn Ṣayyād was a trial, not Dajjal himself.
What happened to Ibn Ṣayyād later?
This part is reported but disputed —
What is reported:
- He later accepted Islam openly
- He denied being Dajjal
- He made tawbah
- He lived among the Muslims
Some historical reports say he later:
- participated in military expeditions
- possibly died during the conquest era
But scholars caution: details of his later life are not fully established.
If he were Dajjal, repentance would not apply if he indeed did make taubah.
Next I will In Sha Allah post the verified account of Dajjal being chained and mentioning the signs before arrival.
May Allah forgive me if I missed anything here, thought this was an interesting and important detail to post about.
Sahih Muslim 2930a, 2931, 169d - The Book of Tribulations and Portents of the Last Hour - كتاب الفتن وأشراط الساعة - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم)
Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad (saws) in English and Arabic
Full account.
I know there’s certain secret fans of Islam on here that without knowing any better like to pluck out Hadith out of context and then act smart, so thought I’d clear things up so there’s no confusion
Any Muslim brothers, correct me if I missed anything.
