What's new

Are tracking apps to monitor Coronavirus spread an invasion of privacy?

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,993
China, Middle East - a few places now asking people to use these.

The idea is that the government can tell people if someone in their area or where they have been contracts this disease.

All good so far.

But what if these apps are used to discriminate against people? In the West, people can be politely asked to self isolate.

In other parts of the world, there could be fines or deportation or jail if you dont get yourself test or report to the authorities.

So an invasion of privacy or a necessary tool to battle COVID-19.
 
Tech companies, governments, and international agencies have all announced measures to help contain the spread of the COVID-19 virus.

Some of these measures impose severe restrictions on people’s freedoms, including to their privacy and other human rights. Unprecedented levels of surveillance, data exploitation, and misinformation are being tested across the world.

Many of those measures are based on extraordinary powers, only to be used temporarily in emergencies. Others use exemptions in data protection laws to share data.

Some may be effective and based on advice from epidemiologists, others will not be. But all of them must be temporary, necessary, and proportionate.

It is essential to keep track of them. When the pandemic is over, such extraordinary measures must be put to an end and held to account.

https://privacyinternational.org/examples/tracking-global-response-covid-19
 
Every service provided has its cost. It's either your money or your data.
 
Main issue is that it opens doors for unscrupulous regimes to track movements of individuals
 
It is an invasion of privacy and I hope this will not happen in western countries.
 
It is an invasion of privacy and I hope this will not happen in western countries.


BERLIN: Personal data protection is a thorny subject in privacy-loving Germany, but the country is nevertheless considering using a smartphone app to help manage the spread of the new coronavirus.

Even Chancellor Angela Merkel — who often refers to her youth in surveillance-ridden communist East Germany — said on April 1 that if it turns out to be a helpful way of tracking the spread of the virus "I would... of course be willing to use it for myself".

In some ways, Germany appears to be faring better than many of its European neighbours in its battle against the coronavirus.

Europe's biggest economy has so far managed to limit the number of deaths from Covid-19 to under 1,000, partly thanks to aggressive testing modelled on the South Korean approach.

It has also avoided a strict lockdown like those in France, Italy or Spain.

Merkel and her government are already looking ahead to the next phase, when they hope it will be possible to relax social distancing rules and reopen some public spaces.

And according to Health Minister Jens Spahn, "for that to be possible, we need to be able to identify and reach anyone who has had contact with an infected person very quickly".

‘Voluntary sharing’

When the government first proposed using mobile phone data to help track the spread of the virus in mid-March, it was forced to back down after a public outcry.

Under the proposals, mobile phone operators would have been required to hand over the data of 46 million customers to help the authorities trace the contacts of infected people.

Such non-consensual mass surveillance was a shocking prospect in a country still traumatised by memories of Nazi dictatorship and later the Stasi secret police in the former communist east.

The government is now reviewing proposals and will come up with a new plan “in the coming days”, according to Spahn, who is convinced that “the use of mobile phone data will be a key factor against the spread”.

Under the new plans, data will be shared “on a voluntary basis”, according to Justice Minister Christine Lambrecht.

A proposed smartphone app will track and record people’s interactions via Bluetooth for two weeks, without using geolocation tracking and with a promise that data will be securely protected.

Personal data protection is a thorny subject in privacy-loving Germany, but the country is nevertheless considering using a smartphone app to help manage the spread of the new coronavirus.

If a person becomes infected, the app will automatically send a push notification to anyone they have crossed paths with in the past two weeks, to warn them of the risk of infection.

Only those who have downloaded the app will receive the infection warnings, and the identity of infected people will be kept secret.

The idea was inspired by a similar digital tool used in the city-state of Singapore, which has managed to limit the spread of the virus despite being very densely populated.

It was developed by Germany's Fraunhofer Heinrich Hertz Institute (HHI) telecommunications research institute, in collaboration with the Robert Koch Institute disease control centre.

“HHI is working on an application that will make it possible to record the proximity and duration of contacts between people on mobile phones over the past two weeks, completely anonymously and without the need to record their location,” a spokeswoman for the company confirmed to AFP.

The firsts tests were carried out at an army barracks in Berlin on Wednesday, according to media reports.

‘Limited time only’

Using people’s data in this way also has the approval of Germany’s federal commissioner for data protection, with certain conditions.

“The collection and evaluation of personal data to interrupt chains of infection can only be carried out with the consent of citizens,” commissioner Ulrich Kelber told AFP.

“This data should be stored only for a limited and clearly defined period, and with the sole aim of fighting the pandemic. After that, it should be deleted,” he said, predicting a “strong willingness to participate” if these conditions are met.

According to Kelber, implementing widespread Chinese-style surveillance would be impossible in Germany.

“There is no comparable technological infrastructure for surveillance and, more importantly, Germany has no laws that allow virtually uninterrupted surveillance of citizens using smartphones, apps or other devices,” he said.

Meanwhile, the German public seem to be softening to the idea of handing over their mobile phone data.

According to a YouGov poll published on Tuesday, half of Germans are in favour of the idea, while only 38% consider it inappropriate. — AFP

https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tec...ad-germany-turns-to-app-to-track-virus-spread
 
The COVID-19 hotline set up by Quebec's government has been ringing off the hook for the past couple of weeks.

Though the province has only a quarter of Canada's population, it has more than half of the country's nearly 18,000 coronavirus cases, putting it under enormous pressure to disseminate information faster than the disease can spread.

A new chatbot, developed for the province by a local tech startup called Botpress Technologies, will be unveiled on the government's coronavirus website soon to help diffuse some of the strain.

The development of the bot happened fast, said Marc Mercier of the Quebec City bot-making startup, Botpress Technologies. They offered their help, and the next morning they were meeting the government.

"We didn't even know if we were going to get paid. We just felt it was the right thing to do," said Mercier, who added that deployment of the bot will likely happen within the next couple of weeks.

In the past three weeks, thousands of skilled tech workers around the world have stepped forward to volunteer their time to governments and organisations struggling to deliver critical services amid COVID-19 chaos. While some say the goodwill is commendable, others worry citizens will forsake privacy rights and civil liberties in order for governments to have convenient services right now.

In Europe, a virtual army of 3,300 volunteers organising on LinkedIn under the banner Cyber Volunteers 19, or CV19 for short, is working to provide online security to hospitals and healthcare institutions.

Lisa Forte, a partner at the United Kingdom-based Red Goat Cyber Security, co-founded CV19 with Daniel Card and Radoslaw Gnat three weeks ago after learning healthcare providers' online systems were at heightened risk amidst the pandemic.

"We were concerned that, should the worst happen and they suffer a cyberattack at this moment in time, it could be pretty devastating," Forte said on the phone. "It could even lead to a loss of life, potentially, in a worst-case scenario."

So far, the group is supporting hundreds of institutions in the UK, Spain, France, Italy, Greece and Poland, and has the capacity to help more, said Forte. CV19 has fended off ransomware threats and phishing scams, and has worked to patch vulnerabilities in hospitals' internal communication systems, she added.

The United States has a similar grassroots volunteer corps, organised by several ex-White House staffers and other high-profile technologists. The group, US Digital Response, has 3,000-plus volunteers ready to help state and local governments coordinate and communicate COVID-19 digital measures, said co-founder Cori Zarek - a former deputy US chief technology officer in the Obama administration and a current director at Georgetown University's Beeck Center for Social Impact and Innovation.

Zarek told Al Jazeera, for instance, that the state of New Jersey told the group it needed help informing small businesses what kind of financial aid was available to them. "We had a volunteer who, I think over the course of a weekend, put up assistance.business.nj.gov. If you're a small business, you can head to that site and quickly navigate through a series of questions to understand what relief might be available to you," she said.

US Digital Response has tackled a few dozen requests so far, including efforts to bring online the kinds of admin work normally done by fax and mail, as well as help coordinate mutual-aid networks like its Neighbor Express website for Concord, California.

"We have hundreds and hundreds of cities and counties [in the US], and they all kind of operate independently and don't always have direct lines of communication with one another," said Zarek.

"Particularly in a crisis, those networks are what you really need to be able to move fast, understand what's working elsewhere, and then consider how to adapt it where you are. So that's where we came in - to play that convenient coordinating role."

These kinds of small-scale tech projects are helping governments put out some fires. But, some researchers warn that not all offers of help are equally altruistic, nor are all helpers capable of handling the complex social problems colliding inside this global health crisis.

Ashkan Soltani, an independent privacy researcher and the former chief technologist of the US Federal Trade Commission, worries about the implications of embracing a tech market approach to solving COVID-19. "There's not a lot of good data right now. Our actual ground truth surveying instrument - which is actual tests, the number of people infected - is quite limited, so we're grasping and all these proxies for data," he said.

As an example, Soltani pointed to a "smart" thermometer whose maker says it can help detect coronavirus hot spots - nevermind that the data would be biased, as it would only pull data from those with the little-known thermometer, which ranges in price from $20 to $70 depending on the model.

A track-and-trace mobile app in Singapore, meanwhile, promises to inform those who might have come into contact with infected people by using anonymised location data. But it only works for people who have voluntarily downloaded the app, which limits its efficacy. Some researchers worry the next step to flattening the curve may be tracing without permission, which brings up questions of privacy.

Google is already testing those limits with its Community Mobility Reports, which use mobile location data to track people's whereabouts without their explicit consent. The company says it uses "world-class anonymization technology" to tell governments whether their citizens are abiding by stay-home orders.

In moments of crisis, it is easy to get approval for "solutions" that ultimately have long-term effects on civil liberties, Soltani said, pointing to the US Patriot Act that was passed after the September 11, 2001, attacks in the US. The Act granted the US government broad powers to conduct domestic surveillance operations in the name of its counterterrorism efforts.

Soltani is watching for what COVID-19 leaves in its wake. "These are times when draconian policies get put into place," he said.

China has repurposed some of its surveillance tools to track COVID-19 and send information to law enforcement. In Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the "invasive" use of anti-terrorism surveillance tools to track the virus was needed for the country's battle against an "invisible enemy".

Elsewhere, the European Commission has already asked major European telecoms to give them greater access to customers' mobile location data. Similar efforts are under way in the US. A letter led by Amnesty International and co-signed by a dozen citizens' rights groups is imploring the US government to install guardrails on any emergency digital measures in order to protect individuals' civil liberties. Soltani said it is not a difficult leap from using tech to track the spread of the virus, to using it to dictate who is allowed to move around and who is not.

In a world where most people have internet access, the solution is not to have no tech help at all. Soltani said it is commendable that so many tech workers and companies are volunteering time and resources to help in their own way. But rigorous privacy protections are required now, knowing that governments may never repeal their newfound extraordinary powers.

In that sense, thoughtful tech solutions have a lot of power to advance the cause of digital privacy. "The question [for apps and developers] is going to be, 'What are the policy decisions that they made?'" said Soltani.

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/f...h-coronavirus-fight-cost-200408120109627.html
 
But how will you track when you can buy a sim without any documentation and hence, the network though providing you with the services, they actually don't know who you are.
 
People are accepting the slave system they live in.

In the UK a police officers are stopping and asking 'where are you are going?' The idiots in this society dont even realise there is no legislation for police to ask you this but will answer like the sheep they are.

As wrote above , this is part of the end goal. Enslave humanity so you can control them like puppets on a string.
 
Apple and Google are jointly developing technology to alert people if they have recently come into contact with others found to be infected with coronavirus.

They hope to initially help third-party contact-tracing apps run efficiently.

But ultimately, they aim to do away with the need to download dedicated apps, to encourage the practice.

The two companies believe their approach - designed to keep users, whose participation would be voluntary, anonymous - addresses privacy concerns.

Their contact-tracing method would work by using a smartphone's Bluetooth signals to determine to whom the owner had recently been in proximity for long enough to have established contagion a risk.

If one of those people later tested positive for the Covid-19 virus, a warning would be sent to the original handset owner.

No GPS location data or personal information would be recorded.

"Privacy, transparency and consent are of utmost importance in this effort and we look forward to building this functionality in consultation with interested stakeholders," Apple and Google said in a joint statement.

"We will openly publish information about our work for others to analyse."

US President Donald Trump is expected to give the initiative his backing, at a White House press conference later.

Apple is the developer of iOS. Google is the company behind Android. The two operating systems power the vast majority of smartphones in use.

Some countries - including Singapore, Israel, South Korea and Poland - are already using people's handsets to issue coronavirus contagion alerts.

Other health authorities - including the UK, France and Germany - are working on initiatives of their own. And some municipal governments in the US are reportedly about to adopt a third-party app.

The two technology giants aim to bring coherence to all this by allowing existing third-party apps to be retrofitted to include their solution.

This would make the apps interoperable, so contact tracing would continue to work as people travelled overseas and came into contact with people using a different tool.

Apple and Google have been working on the effort for about two weeks but have not externally revealed their plans until Friday.

If successful, the scheme could help countries relax lockdowns and border restrictions.

Phone-based matches

The companies aim to release a software building-block - known as an API (application programming interface) - by mid-May.

This would allow others' apps to run on the same basis.

Records of the digital IDs involved would be stored on remote computer servers but the companies say these could not be used to unmask a specific individual's true identity.

Furthermore, the contact-matching process would take place on the phones rather than centrally.

This would make it possible for someone to be told they should go into quarantine, without anyone else being notified.

The two companies have released details of the cryptography specifications they plan to use to safeguard privacy, and details of the role Bluetooth will play.

They hope this will convince activists their approach can be trusted.

Apple and Google say another benefit of their solution is developers would not risk the iOS and Android versions of their apps becoming incompatible because of a buggy update.

In addition, they believe it would be less taxing on battery life than current contact-tracing systems.

No app needed

Phase two of the initiative involves building contact-tracing capabilities into the iOS and Android operating systems. Users could then switch the capability on and off again without having to download an app at all.

Approved third-party apps would still be able to interact with the facility if desired.

The facility would be delivered via a future system software update. But the companies have yet to say when this would occur.

"This is a more robust solution," they say, suggesting there would be wider adoption if users did not have to download additional software for themselves.

It also provides the companies with the ability to easily disable tracing on a regional basis when the pandemic ends.

While Apple and Google hope others will see benefits of adopting their approach, this is not guaranteed.

An independent effort - the Pan-European Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing (PEPP-PT) initiative - revealed its own attempt to deliver a privacy-centric solution on 1 April.

About 130 technologists and scientists are involved and the group has already made contact with several European governments.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52246319
 
KARACHI: A day after digital and human rights groups urged the government to protect the public’s right to privacy while adopting technological solutions to the Covid-19 outbreak, the authorities released a draft personal data protection bill for consultation.

In a press release issued on Friday, the Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication (MoITT) said it had formulated a draft ‘Personal Data Protection Bill, 2020’ as privacy of personal data of an individual had become more relevant and important than ever because of the increasing use of ICT (information and communications technology) services during the Covid-19 pandemic.

“In order to promote a broader collaborative process, the MoITT has placed the draft bill on its website for public opinion. The Ministry of IT and Telecom invites all the stakeholders to share their feedback on the aforesaid bill for further enhancements,” it said.

The bill is available to download from the IT ministry’s official website. According to details on the website, the stakeholders can share their feedback via email at info@moitt.gov.pk before May 15.

Rights groups want public’s right to privacy protected during Covid outbreak

However, MoITT secretary Shoaib Siddique told Dawn that there was no deadline for the consultation process at the moment and the process was open-ended for now. “We will decide the timeline for implementation depending on the feedback,” he said.

This is not Pakistan’s first data protection draft. In July 2018, the Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication had drafted the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2018, proposing maximum punishment of up to two years imprisonment and Rs5 million fine on unlawful processing of personal data.

According to the recent draft, the purpose of the legislation will be to govern the collection, processing, use and disclosure of personal data and to establish and making provisions about offenses relating to violation of the right to data privacy of individuals by collecting, obtaining or processing of personal data by any means.

The desired legal framework would clearly spell out the responsibilities of the data collectors and processors as well as rights and privileges of the data subjects along with institutional provisions for regulation of activities relating to the collections, storing, processing and usage of personal data.

Rights groups call for close introspection

Earlier on Thursday, digital and human rights groups in a joint statement to the government raised their concerns regarding the “excessive usage of digital surveillance measures” during the Covid-19 outbreak in the absence of a data protection law.

The groups urged the government to ensure that the use of technology in these times did not go unchecked, particularly by limiting the scope of data collection during the Covid-19 pandemic. The statement also requested the government to employ transparency in its process of collecting, storing and processing public data.

As the government has employed digital measures such as cell phone tracking for containing the virus, rights groups said it must ensure that the process of data collection during the coronavirus outbreak must be solely for the purpose of controlling the spread, and must, therefore, be time-bound.

The government must ensure that the collected data, and all of its copies, would be deleted within a given time frame, they said.

Following the IT ministry’s announcement for consultation on its draft bill, digital rights groups said they appreciated and welcomed the step to make data protection and privacy of citizens a priority.

“It is encouraging that the government is thinking about a data protection law that is long overdue in Pakistan. However, only a month for consultation when we are under lockdown makes the consultation process very rushed for a critical law,” Bolo Bhi’s director Usama Khilji told Dawn.

Mr Khilji said at a time when the government was mass tracking cell phones without any transparency or accountability, there was a greater need for conversation around protection of privacy rights.

Sharing concerns on the existing draft, he feared the law could be linked to the controversial online harms rules, especially Section 15 of the consultation draft.

According to Nighat Dad of the Digital Rights Foundation (DRF), the most prominent issue in the draft was the exemption and wide-ranging power given to the federal government under Sections 31 and 38.

“Given that the government bodies collect and process vast amounts of personal data, the bill will be rendered toothless in those contexts as it does not bring authorities under the ambit of the law,” she said while speaking to Dawn.

The rights groups also expressed concern that the data protection authority, proposed in the law, required multi-stakeholder members who were expected to be full time members of the commission.

“The PDPA authority to be created under the bill should be made firmly independent, which would be difficult given the provisions allowing the federal government to issue policy directives that they will have to comply with,” said Ms Dad.

“It would be wiser to have independent members rather than those paid by the state for this authority to ensure fairness, as is practice in the ombudsperson office,” added Mr Khilji.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1548214/govt-seeks-consultation-on-data-protection-bill
 
When the Australian government announced it was developing a contact-tracing app that would essentially monitor people’s movements, a heated debate about privacy was inevitable.

The app is modelled on a similar one in Singapore called TraceTogether. It uses Bluetooth to record contact you’ve had with other people, even if you do not know them.

If you’ve tested positive for Covid-19, health authorities could monitor your movements through the app and trace who you were near - if that person has the app they’d be informed they were near an infected person.

Signing up is voluntary. But to be effective, the app needs 40% of the population to consent to using it.

There’s still a great deal of scepticism. Even in Singapore, only 20% of the population are using it. It’s unclear what kind of information the government will have, for how long and what exactly people will be consenting to.

The attorney general is looking into privacy implications. Many are asking if federal privacy laws will be changed to accommodate the app.

The health minister Greg Hunt said he’ll be downloading it. But for people to buy into it, it’s crucial the government guarantees they’re not trading their privacy for better health information.
 
When Singapore launched the first smartphone app of its kind last month to identify and alert people who had interacted with carriers of the novel coronavirus, the city-state of roughly 5.7 million people had just 385 cases of infections.

But even as cases in the country - which is in lockdown - have surged past 9,000, only about one in five people have downloaded the app, TraceTogether, which uses Bluetooth signals to log when people have been close to one another.

The modest numbers in a tech-savvy country where trust in government is high shows the challenges facing public health authorities and technology experts around the world who are looking to exit lockdowns and who believe contact-tracing apps can play an important role in restarting economies.

A few countries, including South Korea and Israel, are using high-tech methods of contact tracing that involve tracking peoples' locations via phone networks. But such centralised, surveillance-based approaches are viewed as invasive and unacceptable in many countries for privacy reasons.

Scientists and researchers from more than 25 countries published an open letter on Monday urging governments not to abuse such technology to spy on their people and warning of risks in an approach championed by Germany.

"We are concerned that some 'solutions' to the crisis may, via mission creep, result in systems which would allow unprecedented surveillance of society at large," said the letter that gathered more than 300 signatures.

The Bluetooth approach, being pursued at various stages by governments across Europe and Latin America, as well as in Australia and many Asia nations, requires a majority of people in a geographic area to adopt it for it to be effective.

The apps should be voluntary, and would need to be downloaded by at least 60 percent of the population to achieve the so-called "digital herd immunity" needed to suppress COVID-19, say researchers from the University of Oxford's Big Data Institute.

An app in India, believed to be the second in the world to go live after Singapore, has reached 50 million downloads on Android phones, which dominate the market. That's a small fraction of India's 500 million-strong smartphone user base, not to mention its population of more than 1.3 billion.

"It requires quite a bit of effort on your side as a user and the value is not very tangible," said Frederic Giron, a Singapore-based analyst with market research firm Forrester, referring to TraceTogether.

Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced new anti-virus efforts on Tuesday and said "we will need everyone's cooperation to install and use" apps such as TraceTogether, though he stopped short of saying it would be mandatory.

The efforts in Singapore, India and elsewhere are still in their early stages. A joint initiative announced last week by Apple and Google could give the concept a boost, in part by smoothing key technical issues.

The apps also have limited utility during lockdowns, but could prove much more appealing when people are again in frequent contact. Italian carmaker Ferrari, for example, is rolling out a voluntary contact-tracing app as part of its programme for safely reopening its factories.

In Australia, the government has suggested such apps could be mandatory, though that approach is fiercely opposed by European governments and privacy advocates. Apple and Google say they will not support compulsory tracing apps.

The Bluetooth-based apps are designed to be more privacy-friendly than tracking techniques that use GPS or mobile phone data. They use Bluetooth to broadcast and receive an encrypted, pseudonymous signal from nearby phones and create a log of interactions that remain on the phone, so users' names and numbers are not disclosed.

If a person tests positive for COVID-19, people who were near that person for a certain period of time can be alerted via their phones. The India app also has other functions and uses GPS data to identify infection clusters.

Some people in Singapore and India say they are willing to use such an app, even at some cost to their privacy.

"Right now, I don't care about privacy, at least amid this crisis," said Bengaluru-based Ganga Bopaiah, who works for an IT services company and already uses the Indian app, known as Aarogya Setu, which means "health bridge".

"As long as COVID-19 is around I'd use it. In fact, I will use it more after the lockdown eases."

Still, privacy is a contentious topic in India, especially in light of recent tensions between the government and the country's minority Muslim population.

"There is always an element of doubt when the government is asking you to divulge personal information," said Harish Iyer, an Indian LGBT rights activist who has not downloaded the app.

Self-quarantine orders in India's slums have also fanned mistrust among some Muslims who believe health workers are gathering personal data under the guise of containing the pandemic.

Background gripes
The Indian government has been heavily backing the Aarogya Setu app, sending emails to companies including Facebook and Google requesting them to promote the app, an official at Indian's IT ministry said.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi also recommended that people download it.

Singapore has not pushed TraceTogether as heavily to date, though the prime minister's comments on Tuesday suggest that is changing.

A big complaint about TraceTogether is that it doesn't work in the "background" on an iPhone, meaning the app has to be open at all times, which drains power and can interfere with other processes. Apple does not permit iPhone apps running in the background to access Bluetooth, for security reasons.

The new tools Apple has promised as part of its joint effort with Google will solve that problem, but only for apps that adhere to other requirements such as forgoing any use of location data and not being mandatory.

The TraceTogether developers this week welcomed the efforts by Google and Apple, and said they would work with the companies' upcoming technologies to improve the app.

https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/...ed-success-privacy-fears-200421165208200.html
 
As countries search for ways to exit lockdown and avoid or manage a second wave of covid-19 cases, many have turned to the promise held by contact-tracing apps. In a rare display of collaboration, Apple and Google recently joined forces to help the technology work effectively.

Such apps look attractive to countries looking to lift restrictions, but there is growing evidence that it will be difficult to make them work. A simulation of a city of 1 million people by researchers at the University of Oxford, published yesterday, found that 80 per cent of smartphone users in the UK would need to install a contact-tracing app in order for it to be effective in suppressing an epidemic: that is 56 per cent of the national population. The UK’s chief scientific adviser, Patrick Vallance, has indicated that he thinks such apps might have a role to play in contact tracing but that it would be a tall order to get 80 per cent of smartphone owners in the UK to use them.

That is a tough target for the UK’s NHSX, the National Health Service digital transformation unit, which is developing such an app. Surveys of 6000 potential app users in five countries suggest the level of take-up is unlikely to be this high. Results suggest that nearly 74 per cent of UK smartphone users would be willing to install a contact-tracing app, but the proportion who do it in reality could be much lower. In Singapore, only an estimated 17 per cent of the population installed a contact-tracing app launched last month. Even if app uptake is low, however, the University of Oxford team estimates that such technology could still cut cases and deaths.

The principle behind contact-tracing apps is fairly simple. Once installed, they use Bluetooth low-energy (LE) technology to record when a phone has come into close proximity with anyone else using the app. If either person later reports coronavirus symptoms, the other party is notified, so they could self-isolate or seek health advice. An alert could also be sent if a medical authority certifies the other person tested positive for the virus – this would be one way to avoid users trolling the system by falsely claiming symptoms. In theory, the apps work anonymously and only store data temporarily, without collecting location.

Bluetooth problems

Even if it were feasible to get a high number of voluntary installations, there is the big question of whether using Bluetooth to establish a contact works well, said Katina Michael at Arizona State University and Roba Abbas at the University of Wollongong, Australia, in a joint email to New Scientist. “How reliable is the system to gather proximity information? The range of Bluetooth is much larger than 1.5 meters for social distancing,” they say.

Ross Anderson at the University of Cambridge says the range of Bluetooth can vary greatly depending on how people hold their phones, and whether they are indoors or outdoors. He also points out that the signals pass through walls, so people behind screens and in different rooms could be unnecessarily flagged as having had contact. The result could be a flood of false positives. Even the Oxford team, which is advising NHSX on its app, say the accuracy with which Bluetooth can be a useful proxy for virus transmission risk is “currently uncertain”.

A further potential issue is the quality of the data. Michael and Abbas say they understand that many apps being considered would only record contacts every 5 minutes, which might mean infectious contacts are missed.

There are a host of other questions. Key elements will be the level of trust between citizens and governments, how privacy is preserved, keeping the apps voluntary, and how to also protect people who might not have a smartphone or the ability to install an app – a group that is likely to include many vulnerable older people. The American Civil Liberties Union yesterday laid out a list of principles, including the need for an exit strategy for such apps, to avoid such systems being maintained for “surveillance creep” after an epidemic has passed.

Nevertheless, many countries are on the verge of deploying apps. Germany is expected to release one imminently, and Australia is working on one too. One of the most high profile existing apps has been Singapore’s TraceTogether app, built by the city state’s government. But even its creators admit that it is too early to tell how effective it is. Moreover, “every country will have to develop its own app” because of different situations and requirements, says a spokesperson at Pan-European Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing, a European technology initiative.

Anderson is damning about the prospects for apps. Using them to trace contacts was “always a long shot”, he says, adding that it would be better to recruit thousands of people to undertake the tracing manually. Vallance says apps should be part of a much broader contact-tracing approach, while the UK health secretary Matt Hancock said today that such apps were a “critical” part of government efforts.

However effective the apps turn out to be, they cannot be a silver bullet for exiting social distancing measures, and must be part of a much broader effort of testing and contact tracing.

“Contact-tracing apps are likely to be utilised as a means for fighting the spread of covid-19. However, they cannot be used in isolation. The apps themselves will not contain the spread,” say Michael and Abbas.



Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/articl...tact-tracing-apps-may-not-work/#ixzz6KMSbQwGL
 
Im young and healthy, if I die, so be it.

There is no way I will use such an app or be forced to. My business is my business not the states.

If they want to track you , they can do also without any problems. There is no such thing as privacy in the digital age, if this helps to save lives, I am all for it.
 
If they want to track you , they can do also without any problems. There is no such thing as privacy in the digital age, if this helps to save lives, I am all for it.

They can only track you using phones. Unless they want to spend thousands using satellite or police survaillance.

You get the app, i prefer to keep my privacy.
 
It totally depends on where you are and who controls the data.

In a totalitarian regime, you are done and a slave. This is already implemented in china and they use points for you, if you fall below you wont be able to leave the country or even board trains and buses, sometimes they could put you under house arrest.

In a democracy and free system like europe and US you are at least protected and have rights and these data centers (FB, Apple, Google etc.) will always get exposed via whistle blowers and they will get taken to account i.e edward snowden, prism project, FB and cambridge analytics etc.
 
Using tracing system developed by ISI to track suspected Covid-19 cases, says PM

Prime Minister Imran Khan has said that the government is using a system for tracing suspected coronavirus cases provided by the Inter-services Intelligence (ISI). "It was originally [meant to trace] terrorists but we're using it to tackle corona," the prime minister said.

The premier also added that "tracking and testing is the only way to reopen businesses".
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AarogyaSetuApp?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AarogyaSetuApp</a> has triggered security concerns and even armed forces have been advised not to use it. It is a suspected surveillance tool to track your moment under the pretext of monitoring public health. <a href="https://t.co/PSJvlATrP9">pic.twitter.com/PSJvlATrP9</a></p>— Altaf Qadri (@AltafQadriAP) <a href="https://twitter.com/AltafQadriAP/status/1253368475172536320?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 23, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Surely it can't be compulsory to download an app? :13:
 
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia will make it illegal for non-health officials to access data collected on smartphone software to trace the spread of the coronavirus, Prime Minister Scott Morrison said on Friday, amid privacy concerns raised by the measure.

Australia has so far avoided the high death toll of other countries, with only 78 deaths, largely as a result of tough restrictions on movement that have brought public life to a standstill.

The federal government has said existing “social distancing” measures will remain until at least mid-May, and that its willingness to relax them will depend on whether people download the smartphone “app” to identify who a person with the illness has had contact with.

The tracing app, which is yet to be released, has raised concerns from legal and privacy advocates who have said the location data it collects may be used by unrelated bodies like law enforcement agencies.

Morrison said the government would make any use by non-health officials illegal.

“It will be illegal for information to go out of that data store to any other person other than that for whom the whole thing is designed, and that is to support the health worker in the state to be able to undertake the contact tracing,” he told reporters in Canberra.

Morrison also confirmed a local media report which said the data would be stored on servers managed by AWS, a unit of U.S. internet giant Amazon.com Inc, but added that “it’s a nationally encrypted data store”.

The promise of laws to limit use of the app came as the Australian authorities reported another day of low single-digit percentage increases of the illness, which has infected about 6,700 people and resulted in 78 deaths in the country.

With the country’s borders closed for weeks, Morrison said the illness was now in its “community phase”, which meant the health authorities hoped to slow the spread by widespread testing - even of people without symptoms - and contact tracing.

The country’s state governments began urging people to come forward for testing, saying they no longer needed to meet previous criteria of having been in contact with an infected person, having been abroad, or experiencing flu-like symptoms.

A cruise ship linked to a third of the country’s coronavirus deaths left the country on Thursday after a month docked in local waters.

The Ruby Princess, owned by Carnival Corp, has become a flashpoint of public anger after being allowed to unload thousands of passengers in Sydney without health checks on March 19. Hundreds of its passengers later tested positive to COVID-19, about 10% of the country’s overall cases.

Separate criminal, coronial and government investigations have been launched to find out how the ship’s operators were allowed to let coronavirus patients disembark.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ng-data-for-non-health-purposes-idUSKCN2253UA
 
Last edited:
Pakistan's feared spy agency 'traces' virus
M Ilyas Khan

BBC News, Islamabad

Pakistan's powerful ISI intelligence agency is being used to "trace and track" people infected with the coronavirus, Prime Minister Imran Khan has revealed.

"We have this great system of surveillance by the ISI, which was meant for the terrorists, but now we are using it for those with corona," he joked.

Cases of local transmission are on the rise, and reports from several areas say people are hiding their infections to avoid social stigma.

Mr Khan's announcement raised eyebrows, with one politician saying it lacks "practical significance". Many argue the police and other officials with wider on-the-ground networks should be tracing those hiding infections, not spies.

In recent years, the activities of the ISI have prompted concern,with accusations that it has sought to control domestic political opinion.
 
Australia launches controversial tracking app

The Australian government has launched a controversial coronavirus tracing app and promised to legislate privacy protections around it as authorities try to get the country and the economy back onto more normal footing.

Australia and neighbouring New Zealand have both managed to get their coronavirus outbreaks under control before it strained public health systems, but officials in both two countries continue to worry about the risk of another flareup.

"We are winning, but we have not yet won," Australian Health Minister Greg Hunt said at a televised briefing announcing the app's launch

The app, which is based on Singapore's TraceTogether software, uses Bluetooth signals to log when people have been close to one another. It has been criticised by civil liberties groups as an invasion of privacy, others have raised concerns after the app's data storage contract was awared to US-based tech giant Amazon.
 
Australia launches contact-tracing app

An Australian mobile phone app, which notifies people if they have been in close contact with another user who has tested positive for coronavirus, has been launched.

The contact-tracing app - based on one introduced in Singapore - uses bluetooth to "ping" or exchange a "digital handshake" with another user when they come within 1.5 metres of each other.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison has said social restrictions could be eased if enough people download the app. The app needs to be downloaded by 40% of the population to be effective, according to the government.

But concerns have been raised about privacy and the storing of personal information. Health Minister Greg Hunt described safeguarding measures as "the strongest ever", insisting only state health authorities can access the information. The data will be deleted after 21 days.
 
Nearly two million Australians download coronavirus tracker app

Nearly two million Australians rushed to download a new smartphone app designed to make coronavirus contact tracing easier, the government said, overlooking privacy concerns in the hope of speeding up the end of social-distancing lockdowns.

Health Minister Greg Hunt hailed take-up since the app was released Sunday evening as "extraordinary", saying 1.9 million people had downloaded the program in less than 24 hours.

The nation of 25 million people has uncovered just over 6,700 instances of coronavirus, with the rate of new cases falling to 10-20 per day despite widespread testing.

Like governments around the world, Australian authorities are under growing pressure to ease restrictions on travel and public gatherings imposed to halt the spread of the virus, but which have devastated the economy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How effective are contact tracing apps?

Australia and Singapore have contact-tracing apps - and the UK might get one within weeks.

They work by tracking a user's location and then alerting them if they come into contact with an infected person.

In Australia, the government's telling residents that downloading its tracing app is the ticket out of lockdown - so far almost three million people have done so.

But one expert from the National University of Singapore says these apps aren't without their problems - privacy for one, is an issue.

"There is a broader question of how data will be protected, where it will be stored and how long will it be used for? The idea is that it is used only for contact tracing," said Prof James Crabtree. "[But] the temptation will be to keep it and use it for other things."

He also adds that there are limitations to such apps.

"Imagine sitting in a cafe, you leave some virus on the table and an hour later someone else comes in and picks it up. The app won't tell you that," he told the BBC.

"The risk is the app gives people a false sense of confidence. It is not a magic bullet."
 
India mandates tracing app for public and private sector employees

India has mandated that all public and private sector employees use a government-backed Bluetooth tracing app and maintain social distancing in offices as New Delhi begins easing some of its lockdown measures in lower-risk areas.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government on Friday said India - the country with the largest number of people in lockdown - would extends its nationwide control measures for another two weeks from Monday to battle the spread of the coronavirus that causes the Covid-19 illness, but allow “considerable relaxations” in lower-risk districts.

As part of its efforts to fight the deadly virus, India last month launched the app Aarogya Setu - meaning Health Bridge - a Bluetooth and GPS-based system developed by the country’s National Informatics Centre. The app alerts users who may have come in contact with people later found to be positive for COVID-19 or deemed to be at high risk.

“Use of Aarogya Setu shall be made mandatory for all employees, both private and public,” India’s Ministry of Home Affairs said in a notification late on Friday.

It will the responsibility of the heads of companies and organizations “to ensure 100% coverage of this app among the employees,” the ministry said.

Officials at India’s technology ministry and a lawyer who framed the privacy policy for Aarogya Setu told Reuters the app needs to be on at least 200 million phones for it to be effective in the country of 1.3 billion people.

The app has been downloaded around 50 million times on Android phones, which dominate India’s smartphone user base of 500 million, according to Google Play Store data.

The app’s compulsory use is raising concerns among privacy advocates, who say it is unclear how the data will be used and who stress that India lacks privacy laws to govern the app.

“Such a move should be backed by a dedicated law which provides strong data protection cover and is under the oversight of an independent body,” said Udbhav Tiwari, Public Policy Advisor for internet company Mozilla.

New Delhi has said the app will not infringe on privacy as all data is collected anonymously.
 
India mandates tracing app for public and private sector employees

India has mandated that all public and private sector employees use a government-backed Bluetooth tracing app and maintain social distancing in offices as New Delhi begins easing some of its lockdown measures in lower-risk areas.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government on Friday said India - the country with the largest number of people in lockdown - would extends its nationwide control measures for another two weeks from Monday to battle the spread of the coronavirus that causes the Covid-19 illness, but allow “considerable relaxations” in lower-risk districts.

As part of its efforts to fight the deadly virus, India last month launched the app Aarogya Setu - meaning Health Bridge - a Bluetooth and GPS-based system developed by the country’s National Informatics Centre. The app alerts users who may have come in contact with people later found to be positive for COVID-19 or deemed to be at high risk.

“Use of Aarogya Setu shall be made mandatory for all employees, both private and public,” India’s Ministry of Home Affairs said in a notification late on Friday.

It will the responsibility of the heads of companies and organizations “to ensure 100% coverage of this app among the employees,” the ministry said.

Officials at India’s technology ministry and a lawyer who framed the privacy policy for Aarogya Setu told Reuters the app needs to be on at least 200 million phones for it to be effective in the country of 1.3 billion people.

The app has been downloaded around 50 million times on Android phones, which dominate India’s smartphone user base of 500 million, according to Google Play Store data.

The app’s compulsory use is raising concerns among privacy advocates, who say it is unclear how the data will be used and who stress that India lacks privacy laws to govern the app.

“Such a move should be backed by a dedicated law which provides strong data protection cover and is under the oversight of an independent body,” said Udbhav Tiwari, Public Policy Advisor for internet company Mozilla.

New Delhi has said the app will not infringe on privacy as all data is collected anonymously.

Former Congress president Rahul Gandhi on Saturday said the compulsory use of the Aarogya Setu app, with no institutional checks, is bound to raise data and privacy concerns for the citizens. He added it is akin to spying on citizens without their consent.

“The Arogya Setu app, is a sophisticated surveillance system, outsourced to a pvt operator, with no institutional oversight - raising serious data security & privacy concerns. Technology can help keep us safe; but fear must not be leveraged to track citizens without their consent,” tweeted Gandhi this evening.

The government, on Friday, made the Aarogya Setu App mandatory for people living in the coronavirus Containment Zones inside the 130 districts identified as the Red Zones. The government considers the App to be a handy coronavirus containment tool which can be used to assess the level of risk an individual is exposed to vis-a-vis Covid-19 infection.

The App, developed by the ministry of electronics and information technology (MEITY), uses cell phone tracking technology to put individuals in low-risk, moderate and high-risk categories by tracing if the person came in contact with a virus-infected patient or a person suspected to be infected.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...u-app-order/story-WDphVPSIBmKclV4WUcou0L.html
 
Asked about border restrictions, Transport Secretary Grant Shapps says people coming into the UK could be required to download the NHS contract-tracking app currently being developed.

This will be trialled next week on the Isle of Wight, he says, then rolled out for the “population at large" later this month.

He says about 50-60% of the population will need to download the app to make the system work, and the "whole country" will be asked to participate.
 
Last edited:
Apple and Google ban location tracking in contact tracing apps

Apple and Google have said they would ban the use of location tracking in apps that use a new contact tracing system the two are building to slow the spread of the coronavirus.

Apple and Google, whose operating systems power 99% of smart phones, said last month they would work together to create a system for notifying people who have been near others who have tested positive for Covid-19.

Both companies said that privacy and preventing governments from using the system to compile data on citizens was a primary goal.

The system uses bluetooth signals from phones to detect encounters and does not use or store GPS location data.

But the developers of coronavirus-related apps in several US states told Reuters last month that it was vital that they be allowed to use GPS location data in conjunction with the new contact tracing system in order to track how outbreaks move and identify hotspots.
 
Israel extends coronavirus cell phone surveillance by three weeks

A parliamentary panel on Tuesday authorised Israel's Shin Bet security service to continue using mobile phone data to track people infected by the coronavirus until May 26, prolonging an initiative described by critics as a threat to privacy.
 
England's Health Secretary Matt Hancock has dismissed warnings by civil liberties campaigners that a coronavirus contact tracing app could open the door to widespread "state surveillance".

Ministers have urged the public to sign up to the app - which is beginning trials on the Isle of Wight - as a way to exit the current lockdown and re-start the economy.

But they have run into opposition from some Tory MPs and campaign groups concerned about the potential for the state to monitor individuals' movements and contacts.

Matt Hancock insisted it is "completely wrong" to suggest the app is a threat to civil liberties.

Amnesty International UK has questioned why - unlike other European countries - Britain is establishing a central database to store information.
 
Countries around the world are developing Covid-19 smartphone apps to limit the spread of coronavirus and relax lockdown restrictions.

It's hoped the information they gather can be used to alert people whether they pose a risk of spreading the contagion, and need to isolate. But, over recent weeks, a split has emerged between two different types of app - the so-called centralised and decentralised versions.

Both types use Bluetooth signals to log when smartphone owners are close to each other - so if someone develops Covid-19 symptoms, an alert can be sent to other users they may have infected.

Under the centralised model, the anonymised data gathered is uploaded to a remote server where matches are made with other contacts, should a person start to develop Covid-19 symptoms.

This is the method the UK is pursuing.

By contrast, the decentralised model gives users more control over their information by keeping it on the phone. It is there that matches are made with people who may have contracted the virus. This is the model promoted by Google, Apple and an international consortium.

Both sides have their fans.

Backers of the centralised model say it can give the authorities more insight into the spread of the virus and how well the app is performing. Supporters of the decentralised approach say it offers users a higher degree of privacy, protecting them from hackers or the state itself revealing their social contacts.

Centralised v decentralised apps

In truth, both are unproven at this stage. South Korea, seen as one of the most successful countries at tackling Covid-19, has done it without a contact-tracing app. It has however used other surveillance methods which would be seen as invasive by many.

At the start, the centralised approach was seen pioneering. Singapore's TraceTogether was widely viewed as the one to emulate. But that changed after it emerged the app was only being used by about 20% of the local population, and there had been a resurgence of Covid-19 cases.

Part of the problem is that TraceTogether does not work properly when in the background on iPhones because of the way Apple restricts use of Bluetooth. The firm has promised to waive these curbs, but only if apps fall into line with its decentralised system. Singapore has since signalled it will do so as a result.

"We are working with Apple and Google to make the app more effective, especially for iOS users," a spokesman told the BBC.

Australia, another early adopter of the centralised approach, launched its CovidSafe app based on TraceTogether, and faced similar issues as a consequence. It has said it plans to adopt the Apple-Google framework, citing a "big shift in performance of Bluetooth connectivity". And on Wednesday, Colombia confirmed it too was considering a switch after having to turn off the contact-tracing feature in its CoronApp.

"[We need to] minimise the risk of generating unnecessary alerts," said presidential advisor Victor Munoz.

'Apple not helping'

Others, though, are still forging ahead with the centralised approach. France's digital minister has said it intends to launch its StopCovid app by 2 June, and is attempting to press Apple into a U-turn of its own.

"Apple could have helped us make the application work even better on the iPhone," said digital minister Cédric O on Tuesday. "They have wished not to do so. I regret this."

But he faces internal resistance from one of the government's own human rights bodies, which has described the design as being "dangerous" and warned it may try to block its adoption.

Norway has already adopted a centralised design for its Smittestopp app, which went live last month in three municipalities. In addition to Bluetooth readings, it also collects GPS location data.

The developer claims that the combination of the two leads to "very accurate contact tracing results without the need for [the Google-Apple interface".

But this has raised privacy concerns, which may have contributed to a fairly high drop-out rate. The Norwegian Institute of Public Health said that as of 28 April, 1.5 million people had downloaded the app, but only 899,142 were actively using it - representing just 20.5% of over-16s in the test zones.

India's contact-tracing app, Aaroya Setu, takes a similar approach to Norway's. To tackle adoption, the government has ruled all government and private sector workers must use it.

Decentralised disciples

Until Apple and Google release their interface, known as an API, it's impossible to be sure their system will be any more successful. But the list of nations flocking to it keeps growing. Germany surprised many when it confirmed it had been convinced decentralisation was the way to go - it had previously seemed set to go hand-in-hand with France.

Poland's forthcoming app may also be about to abandon its centralised plan before launch.

"We assume that adapting ProteGo Safe to Google and Apple APIs will be necessary," developers' notes read. "We assume that adapting… to Google and Apple APIs will be necessary."

Italy's Immuni announced it too was backing the US tech giants' initiative on 29 April, praising its stronger guarantee of anonymity. Other countries set to do likewise include:

Switzerland
Austria
Latvia
Estonia
Finland
Ireland
Canada

Luxembourg's MPs are about to vote on a decentralised approach. And the BBC has also been told Greece is about to adopt a similar position.

Why does all this matter? There may be problems trying to make the two different types of system talk to each other.

"The core reason is that centralised systems ask you to upload the people you have seen, and decentralised systems don't need that data, so they don't play well together," explained Dr Michael Veale of the DP3T group, which supports a similar system to Apple and Google.

"So if you see an app as an important part of reducing lockdown, then you remove the ability to trace the virus as it crosses borders, and viruses don't respect borders."

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52355028
 
It is an invasion of privacy and I hope this will not happen in western countries.

You’re mistaken if you think privacy issues doesn’t happen in Western countries. If anything, in western countries like US and Canada where personal data is easily available on internet. Do you know, I can look up any individual in Canada and US by their email/or name? Talk about privacy.

Have you ever wondered why do we get so many random phone calls from unknown vendors? If you’re on Facebook, then you have already sold your personal details to marketing firms unknowingly.
In today’s world, data is more valuable than actual money.

I used to work for Rogers before and found out that, they used to sell/trade their own customers data to marketing firm for their personal gain/market gain.
 
You’re mistaken if you think privacy issues doesn’t happen in Western countries. If anything, in western countries like US and Canada where personal data is easily available on internet. Do you know, I can look up any individual in Canada and US by their email/or name? Talk about privacy.

Have you ever wondered why do we get so many random phone calls from unknown vendors? If you’re on Facebook, then you have already sold your personal details to marketing firms unknowingly.
In today’s world, data is more valuable than actual money.

I used to work for Rogers before and found out that, they used to sell/trade their own customers data to marketing firm for their personal gain/market gain.

I am fine if someone knows my name and address. I am not fine if someone can monitor where I go and what I do.
 
I am fine if someone knows my name and address. I am not fine if someone can monitor where I go and what I do.

Google always monitor your whereabouts and your likes/searches and everything. We are living in an era where there is no such thing as privacy. You need to start leaving like a cavemen if privacy is so much of a thing to you. Post 9/11 everything have changed.
 
Google always monitor your whereabouts and your likes/searches and everything. We are living in an era where there is no such thing as privacy. You need to start leaving like a cavemen if privacy is so much of a thing to you. Post 9/11 everything have changed.

How do Google monitor you, please explain?
 
Here in Singapore, a contact tracing app was developed early on in the country’s fight against the coronavirus. Called TraceTogether, the app works on bluetooth technology to help make it easier to locate all the people someone may have infected.

So if I’m in a supermarket for instance, and later on it turns out that I’ve got coronavirus the app would have a record of all the signals of other people who had downloaded it and that I had passed on my shopping trip. They can then be contacted and take precautions.

So far just about a fifth of the population has downloaded it according to reports - officials say at least half of the country needs to do it before it can work effectively.

But some Singaporeans are worried about privacy - whether the government will have access to their location data - and that’s why there haven’t been as many people downloading it as the government would like.

Others have complained about the sucking up of battery life.

On TraceTogether’s website, it reassures Singaporeans that won’t happen - and that the data won’t be accessed unless the user has been in close contact with a confirmed case.

Only at that point, the app’s makers say, would someone be contacted by the tracing team.

Still, it has become increasingly clear that Singapore’s government will want more people to download the app before we move out of the partial lockdown we’ve been in the last five weeks.

As the economic cost of that mounts, more may be convinced of the app’s merits.
 
Govt to use technology to trace cases, identify virus hotspots: Asad Umar

Minister for Planning, Development and Special Initiatives Asad Umar on Sunday said that the government will use technology to trace coronavirus cases and identify virus hotspots throughout the country to enforce a "smart lockdown".

Speaking to reporters at the National Command and Operation Centre in Islamabad, Umar said that according to available data, Punjab was enforcing smart lockdown in some 169 areas while Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was enforcing smart lockdown in 177 areas. "This could be a big area or as small as one street," he said.

Umar added that the government has completed work on a portal where data will be collected from all 424 hospitals dealing with coronavirus patients in the country. "Hospitals have already started entering their data. Through this portal we will be able to know the exact number of beds, ventilators and patients in each hospital."

The minister added that the government was also working on a mobile application which people could download for getting information about hospitals and coronavirus facilities. "If someone tests positive [for the virus], they can consult the app to find the nearest hospital that has facilities."

Umar said that this was being done for optimal utilisation of resources. "Through this app, we will be able to avoid a scenario where hospitals do have facilities but the patient is unable to reach them because he does not know where to go," he said, adding that the portal and the app both would go live in the next few days.

He added that the government had engaged with the Rural Support Programme Network who he said had access to more than 25 per cent of the population. "Not only will we communicate awareness messages through them, they will also identify places where we need to send food etc," he said.

Umar noted that some people have stopped sharing their coronavirus symptoms or that they have tested positive over the fear that they would be taken to quarantine centres. He clarified that this was not necessarily the case and the government had issued a notification in this regard, saying that people who have the facility to isolate at home should be allowed to do so.

He urged people to continue taking preventive measures as it was "more important now than ever".

He hailed the services of healthcare professionals, rescue workers, cleaners and other frontline workers and said that it was the responsibility of every citizen to follow precautions so that the virus spread would not get out of control.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1556010/g...trace-cases-identify-virus-hotspots-asad-umar
 
India's Covid-19 contact tracing app has been downloaded 100 million times, according to the information technology ministry, despite fears over privacy.

The app - Aarogya Setu, which means "bridge to health" in Sanskrit - was launched just six weeks ago.

India has made it mandatory for government and private sector employees to download it.

But users and experts in India and around the world say the app raises huge data security concerns.

How does it work?

Using a phone's Bluetooth and location data, Aarogya Setu lets users know if they have been near a person with Covid-19 by scanning a database of known cases of infection.

The data is then shared with the government.

"If you've met someone in the last two weeks who has tested positive, the app calculates your risk of infection based on how recent it was and proximity, and recommends measures," Abhishek Singh, CEO of MyGov at India's IT ministry which built the app, told the BBC.

While your name and number won't be made public, the app does collect this information, as well as your gender, travel history and whether you're a smoker.

Is it mandatory to download the app?

Prime Minster Narendra Modi has tweeted in support of the app, urging everyone to download it, and it's been made mandatory for citizens living in containment zones and for all government and private sector employees.

Noida, a suburb of the capital, Delhi, has made it compulsory for all residents to have the app, saying they can be jailed for six months for not complying.

Food delivery start-ups such as Zomato and Swiggy have also made it mandatory for all staff.

But the government directive is being questioned by some.

In an interview with The Indian Express newspaper, former Supreme Court judge BN Srikrishna said the drive to make people use the app was "utterly illegal".

"Under what law do you mandate it? So far it is not backed by any law," he told the newspaper.

MIT Technology Review's Covid Tracing Tracker lists 25 contact tracing apps from countries around the globe - and there are concerns about some of them too.

Critics say apps such as China's Health Code system, which records a user's spending history in order to deter them from breaking quarantine, is invasive.

"Forcing people to install an app doesn't make a success story. It just means that repression works," says French ethical hacker Robert Baptiste, who goes by the name Elliot Alderson.

What are the main concerns about India's app?

Aarogya Setu stores location data and requires constant access to the phone's Bluetooth which, experts say, makes it invasive from a security and privacy viewpoint.

In Singapore, for example, the TraceTogether app can be used only by its health ministry to access data. It assures citizens that the data is to be used strictly for disease control and will not be shared with law enforcement agencies for enforcing lockdowns and quarantine.

"Aarogya Setu retains the flexibility to do just that, or to ensure compliance of legal orders and so on," says the Internet Freedom Foundation, a digital rights and liberties advocacy group in Delhi.

Aarogya Setu requires constant access to a user's Bluetooth and GPS to collect multiple points of data about a user
The app builders, however, insist that at no point does it reveal a user's identity.

"Your data is not going to be used for any other purpose. No third party has access to it," Mr Singh of MyGov said.

The big issue with the app is that it tracks location, which globally has been deemed unnecessary, says Nikhil Pahwa, editor of internet watchdog Medianama.

"Any app that tracks who you have been in contact with and your location at all times is a clear violation of privacy."

He is also worried by the Bluetooth function on the app.

"If I'm on the third floor and you are on the fourth floor, it will show that we have met, even though we are on different floors, given that Bluetooth travels through walls. This shows 'false positives' or incorrect data."

What are the concerns over privacy?

The app allows the authorities to upload the collected information to a government-owned and operated "server", which will "provide data to persons carrying out medical and administrative interventions necessary in relation to Covid-19".

The Software Freedom Law Centre, a consortium of lawyers, technology experts and students, says it is problematic as it means the government can share the data with "practically anyone it wants".

MyGov says "the app has been built with privacy as a core principle" and the processing of contact tracing and risk assessment is done in an "anonymised manner".

Mr Singh says when you register, the app assigns you a unique "anonymised" device ID. All interactions with the government server from your device are done through this ID only and no personal information is exchanged after registration.

But experts have raised doubts about the government claim.

Mr Alderson has said there are flaws in the app which make it possible to know who is sick anywhere in India.

"Basically, I was able to see if someone was sick at the PMO [prime minister's office] or the Indian parliament. I was able to see if someone was sick in a specific house if I wanted," he wrote on his blog.

Aarogya Setu denied any such privacy breach in a statement.

Content is not available

But, India has "a terrible history" of protecting privacy, says Mr Pahwa, referring to Aadhaar - the world's largest and most controversial biometrics-based identity database.

Critics have repeatedly warned that the scheme puts personal information at risk and have criticised government efforts to compulsorily link it to bank accounts and mobile phone numbers.

"This government has argued that privacy isn't a fundamental right in court," Mr Pahwa said. "We cannot trust it."

India's Supreme Court ruled in 2018 that the controversial Aadhaar scheme was constitutional and did not violate the right to privacy.

And the question of transparency?

Unlike the UK's Covid-19 tracing app, Aarogya Setu is not open source, which means that it cannot be audited for security flaws by independent coders and researchers.

A senior IT ministry official told a newspaper that the government had not made the source code of Aarogya Setu public because it "feared that many will point to flaws in it and overburden the staff overseeing the app's development".

Mr Singh said "all applications are made open source ultimately and the same is applicable to Aarogya Setu also".

Can you beat the system?

To register, users have to give their name, gender, travel history, telephone number and location.

"People can fill the form incorrectly and the government cannot verify it, so the efficacy of the data is questionable," Mr Pahwa told the BBC.

According to a Buzzfeed report, an Indian software engineer had hacked the app to bypass the registration page, and even stopped the app from gathering data through GPS and Bluetooth.

The report also mentioned a comment on Reddit suggesting phone wallpaper as a simple workaround to not downloading the app.

"The privacy conscious are likely to do this. Those who don't want to be forced to give their data to the government will look for and find workarounds. It could be by using a modified app or a screenshot, people will find ways," Mr Pahwa says.

But Mr Singh argues that "if one is staying home and not meeting anyone, it would not matter whether they have the app, or deleted it or switched the Bluetooth off or lied on self-assessment".

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia...at-apps.in-app-msg.whatsapp.trial.link1_.auin
 
News coming out of Thailand, as they reopen shopping malls but under strict conditions:

In a controversial move, shoppers must adhere to a contract-tracing system through their phones. They have to register when they enter and leave the mall, as well as checking in and out of individuals stores within it.
 
Apple has launched a Covid-19 exposure notification feature in the latest update of its iPhone operating system. The software will offer health authorities a way to build apps that can alert people about corona-positive users they have come into contact with, while preserving their anonymity.
 
As COVID-19 continues to devastate the world, a growing number of countries are opting to use invasive surveillance methods to stem the spread of the virus and "flatten the curve".

Since the emergence of the novel coronavirus, several countries, led by Israel, China, Singapore and South Korea, started collecting security camera footage and bank records and using facial recognition technologies and mobile phone data to track the movements of their citizens. Australia recently joined this trend by releasing Covidsafe, a "coronavirus tracking app". The UK is also known to be trialling a similar mobile phone app to increase its contact-tracing abilities and get its population back to work.

In countries where the majority of the population is not used to being subjected to overt mass surveillance, the discussions surrounding the implementation of these measures has focused on "privacy".

But there is reason to be concerned about this new wave of surveillance beyond privacy. Unless we acknowledge the role surveillance plays in perpetuating structures of oppression, the use of tech-based surveillance methods to tackle the virus will serve to exacerbate the suffering of the most vulnerable communities.

We can see what surveillance is really for, and who usually pays the price for it, simply by looking into its history.

Surveillance emerged as a colonial strategy. It was essential for the classification of people and the control of the newly acquired territories.

From the 14th to the 19th century, European colonisers amassed vast quantities of data on the populations they colonised. The most basic tools of surveillance, such as fingerprinting, census taking, map-making and profiling, were refined and implemented in colonial settings by the Dutch in Southeast Asia, the French in Africa, and the British in India and North America.

The British, for example, collected data on caste, religion, profession and age among other classifying characteristics across colonial India. This information was used to solidify inequities of the caste system, and increase religious tensions; essentially to divide and rule.

Surveillance as a tool of scientific racism

In the 19th century, surveillance tools developed in the colonies were used by European governments to classify populations according to innate biological traits, and construct racial hierarchies, both in the colonies and at home. During this time, surveillance aided the implementation of discriminatory policies based on what we now call "scientific racism" and contributed to the development of pseudo-scientific justifications for white supremacy.

In Australia, for example, white colonisers used "scientific" theories based on surveillance data to justify massacres of First Nations people, land theft, removal of children from families, and erasure of language and culture. Over time, they established a racialised hierarchy of citizenship, and started granting citizenship rights and associated benefits based upon whiteness. They eventually banned all non-white migrants from entering the country. The "White Australia policy", which enshrined this racial hierarchy of citizenship in law, only officially ended in 1973.

Surveillance today

Today, surveillance is still being used as a tool to classify people into various zones. Thanks to the "architectures of oppression" that surveillance help built, some people remain safely in "zones of access, inclusion and privilege" while others remain stuck in "zones of invisibility, exclusion and death". Rapidly developing surveillance methods are helping governments keep "undesirable" migrants and refugees outside of their countries' borders, and internal "undesirables" - members of minority communities and the poor among others - inside prisons, detention centres and racialised ghettos.

The continuing coronavirus pandemic has only accentuated this problem.

A disproportionate number of people of colour have died from COVID-19 in the US and Britain. Millions of people stuck in prisons, detention centres and refugee camps across the world have been left to fend for themselves, despite expert warnings that the spread of the virus could be deadly in these contexts.

In many countries, security forces focused their efforts to enforce coronavirus-related restrictions on underprivileged communities. In Australia, Indigenous peoples and migrants are being disproportionately targetted for public health order compliance fines. In the US, there are widespread reports that police officers are using coronavirus stay-at-home orders and policies making masks mandatory to harass and abuse Black Americans.

The new surveillance state and the reordering of society

The rolling out of mass tech-enabled surveillance will help governments expand the existing systems of surveillance and discrimination, which have long been reserved solely for marginalised groups, to their entire populations. Israel, for example, is now using the surveillance tools it developed to monitor Palestinians in the occupied territories to track the movements of the country's entire population.

If the tech-enabled surveillance wave triggered by the coronavirus pandemic continues unchallenged, the governments could not only use these new surveillance opportunities to increase the isolation and oppression of already marginalised communities, they could also create new groups of "undesirables" and restrict their access to most basic rights and services.

China's Alipay Health Code is one example of how biometric data collection could be used to determine who gets to work, travel and exist freely in a society. It assigns people a colour code - green, yellow or red - that indicates their health status. Banners remind everyone of the rules: "Green code, travel freely. Red or yellow, report immediately."

Chile, too, has announced plans to give "immunity passports" to recovered COVID-19 patients, allowing them to go back to work. Germany and the UK are also known to have considered a similar approach.

Implementation of such policies could eventually create a hierarchy of citizenship based on health and ability. It could increase the disadvantages of already marginalised communities, who have an increased prevalence for health problems due to their widespread lack of access to healthcare, sanitation and adequate nutrition. Moreover, these policies could be used to legitimise violence towards the sick, immunocompromised and elderly, as well as people with disabilities.

We need to ensure that this unprecedented public health emergency is not used to legitimise violence towards the most vulnerable members of our communities. As countries decide whether or not to lift restrictions and reopen economies, we need to challenge the use of methods that could pave the way for the rise of eugenic ideologies that determine a person's worth based on their ability to work and contribute to the economy.

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/surveillance-save-covid-19-200520095528251.html
 
Israel’s cabinet has curtailed the involvement of its internal security agency, Shin Bet, in the cellphone tracking of people infected by the coronavirus, saying the measure would be a last resort.

The cabinet had circumvented parliament in March and approved emergency regulations to allow the use of the technology, usually deployed for anti-terrorism. Privacy watchdog groups have challenged the practice in court.

In light of falling contagion rates in Israel, phone tracking is now warranted “in specific and special cases only, where location … cannot be completed with epidemiological investigation using other methods”. This may be reviewed if infections surge.
 
Qatar makes COVID-19 app mandatory, experts question efficiency

Qatar is turning to technology to help contain the coronavirus.

Although the country has only seen 23 confirmed deaths to date, its infection rate remains stubbornly high. More than 40.000 people have been infected amid a population of roughly 2.8 million.

The new Ehteraz app is seen by government officials as the latest salvo in its attempts to curb the transmission of the deadly virus.

Starting late last week, citizens and residents have been required to have the Ehteraz contact-tracing app installed on mobile devices when leaving their homes, allowing the government to track if the user has been in touch with an infected person.

Not having the app installed could lead potentially to a maximum fine of $55,000 or three years in prison.

But the announcement, days before the Eid al-Fitr holiday, led users to raise privacy concerns as the app needs access to files on the phone and permanent use of GPS and Bluetooth for location tracking.

In response, a government spokesperson told Al Jazeera that user data would be safe and only health professionals could access the data.

The government assures that other agencies, such as law enforcement, could not access personal data on the app, and any data collected would be deleted after two months.

"We confirm that all user data on Ehteraz app is completely confidential and is only accessible to relevant, specialised teams when necessary," Qatar's Director of the Public Health Department Dr Mohamed bin Hamad Al Thani said.

Despite these assurances the World Health Organization (WHO) and several independent studies have called the use of apps into doubt, with the WHO saying there is "only anecdotal evidence" they are effective, adding they should not replace manual contact tracing.

MIT Technology Review's Tate Ryan-Mosley, who has created a database of government-backed COVID-19 apps, told Al Jazeera the idea of contact tracing is old, but that digital tracing, which started to gain traction during the Ebola outbreak, has not proven to be effective yet.

"What we're seeing now is a type of tech solutionism, meaning that these new technologies are seen as a panacea to all issues," Ryan-Mosley told Al Jazeera.

Another reason privacy experts call apps like these into question is because they say the technology used is simply not that effective.

"These and other technologies like Bluetooth can be combined for better accuracy, but there's no guarantee that a given phone can be located with six-foot precision at a given time," the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), one of the world's leading digital rights and privacy organisations, told Al Jazeera.

Even the creator of Bluetooth, the technology considered most useful for these purpose apps, said recently that there are several downsides to using the technology, calling it "not accurate" enough.

Sensitive data
However, the government of Qatar said, "the application enables the competent authorities to track the areas where this person was present since downloading the application until the moment of infection and thus all people or a large percentage of the people who mix with them can be known as long they are using the same application."

Eva Blum-Dumontet, senior researcher at privacy organisation Privacy International, questioned why Ehteraz needs a phone number and personal identification number to work, while others countries put out apps that do not need that type of personal information.

"Any app that requires a personal ID number, especially when it is stored in a centralised database, is at risk of outside people getting access to these databases," Blum-Dumontet said, also referring to Singapore's app, which uses a similar database system containing contact information.

"ID numbers are often almost like biometric data, and you can't change them easily. So if it's out there after a leak or a hack, for example, consequences are a lot bigger," she added.

A better way to do this, the EFF and others say, is using so-called "decentralised anonymised systems", which collect the least amount of personal information, that is then only stored on the device and not in a central database.

MIT's Ryan-Mosley added that making any app mandatory might not actually work.

"There's research done that if a government makes something compulsory, like an app, for instance, the likelihood of people putting their trust in it is less," she said, adding: "If people don't trust them, they are going to be looking for workarounds, not using these apps in good faith."

However, Qatari officials maintain that there is no reason for the public to distrust the app.

"Ehteraz will never undermine the privacy of the users, and the stored information will not be kept beyond two months before being deleted forever," Dr Mohammed bin Hamad Al Thani said.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...erts-question-efficiency-200524201502130.html
 
Qatar's virus tracing app stirs rare privacy backlash

Privacy concerns over Qatar's coronavirus contact tracing app have prompted a rare backlash and forced officials to offer reassurance and concessions, according to AFP.

The app forces Android users to permit access to their picture and video galleries, while also allowing the app to make unprompted calls.

The government launched the app in April and on Friday it became mandatory for all citizens and legal residents to install it on their phones.

Non-compliance is punishable by up to three years in jail — the same term as for failing to wear a mask in public — in a state battling one of the world's highest per capita infection rates.
 
Qatar contact-tracing app flaw ‘exposed details of one million users’

Amnesty International says its researchers discovered serious security vulnerabilities in a Covid-19 contact-tracing app in Qatar that is compulsory to download.

The flaw in the Ehteraz app - which was fixed on Friday after the human rights group notified the Qatari authorities - could have exposed highly sensitive personal information of about one million users, including their names and national IDs. Citizens and residents who do not use the app could face up to three years in prison and a fine of $55,000 (£44,500).

“While the Qatari authorities were quick to fix this issue, it was a huge security weakness and a fundamental flaw in Qatar’s contact tracing app that malicious attackers could have easily exploited," Claudio Guarnieri, head of Amnesty International’s Security Lab, said in a statement.

“This incident should act as a warning to governments around the world rushing out contact tracing apps that are too often poorly designed and lack privacy safeguards,” he added.

Currently more than 45 countries have rolled out, or plan to roll out, Covid-19 contact-tracing apps, including Australia, France, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
 
France gives green light to contact-tracing app

France is set to launch its coronavirus contact-tracing app as soon as the weekend after it cleared two parliamentary votes.

The StopCovid app will supplement work already being done by a French team of human contact tracers who are trying to identify people who may be infected with the disease but are unaware of the fact.

The app works by using Bluetooth signals to detect when two handsets are in close proximity, in order to log an estimation of the distance and length of the encounter.

It comes as a test-and-trace system kicks off in England and Scotland.

Germany's forthcoming coronavirus contact-tracing app will trigger alerts only if users test positive for Covid-19.
 
The French coronavirus tracking app, StopCovid, is due to be rolled out at midday today, local time. It will allow anyone who is diagnosed with Covid-19 to warn those with whom they have been in contact in the previous two weeks so they can be tested if they develop symptoms.

Cédric O, France’s secretary of state for the economy responsible for digital technology, said the government wanted to encourage people to download the app, particularly those living in cities where contacts, especially on public transport, are of concern.

Announcing a further easing of lockdown restrictions last week, the prime minister Édouard Philippe said the government “guaranteed” the app would not infringe people’s privacy or be used to collect data on geolocalisation. France’s highest authority for the protection of privacy and data has approved StopCovid and the parliament approved its use last week. “It is an instrument for fighting the virus, not a weapon,” Philippe said.

Apple and Google launched the first contact tracing application API late last month but France, keen not to rely on the US technology firms and wishing to retain “national sovereignty” over the process, developed StopCovid as an independent project. Apple and Google reportedly offered to work with the French government, which turned down the offer considering the companies posed data protection risks. Apple then refused to help with a means of allowing the Bluetooth to work on its phones while the StopCovid app is closed (on iPhones, Bluetooth works only when the app is open).

Cedric O accused the US companies of not cooperating. “Apple could have helped us make it work even better on the iPhone. They didn’t want to do that, for a reason that I can’t quite understand,” he said. “That a large company that has never done so well in economic terms does not help a government fight the crisis, we will have to remember that when the time comes.”

StopCovid will alert anyone who has had “prolonged contact” - meaning more than 15 minutes at less than 1-metre distance – with a person with Covid-19.
 
France's virus-tracing app 'off to a good start'

France's digital minister has said its coronavirus contact-tracing app has been downloaded 600,000 times since it became available on Tuesday afternoon.

StopCovid France is designed to prevent a second wave of infections by using smartphone logs to warn users if they have been near someone who later tested positive for the virus.

But a last-minute launch delay led some citizens to download the wrong product.

England has yet to confirm when its own app will roll out nationwide.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock had originally said it would be by 1 June, and then later suggested it would be around the middle of next week.

But the BBC has learned that it is now unlikely to be before 15 June.

That is in part because of delays in releasing a second version of the software to the Isle of Wight, where it is being trialled.

The update will add symptoms including the loss of taste and smell to a self-diagnosis questionnaire next week, or soon after.

It will also start giving at-risk users a code to enter into a separate website when they book a medical test. This will allow the result, saying whether they tested positive or negative, to be delivered back to them via the app.

Read more: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52905448
 
Germany’s smartphone app to trace coronavirus infections is ready to be launched this week, the health minister, Jens Spahn, said on Sunday.

After delays to ensure the bluetooth technology would work at the correct distance, the government says the app will be a vital tool to help avoid a second wave of infections.

“It’s coming this week,” Spahn told ARD television, but he declined to confirm German media reports that the app would be launched on Tuesday.

The app uses bluetooth short-range radio to detect and contact people at risk of infection by coronavirus and does not rely on a centralised database. Deutsche Telekom and software company SAP are involved. Italy launched a similar app last week.

Spahn also urged people wishing to go on holiday after European border controls are eased on Monday to be careful and ask themselves whether their trip was necessary.

On Monday, Germany lifts its blanket travel warning for European Union nations and Britain, and will replace it with specific travel advice for individual countries and regions.
 
Norway to halt Covid-19 track and trace app over data protection concerns

Norway will halt its Covid-19 track and trace app, and delete all data collected so far, after criticism from the Norwegian Data Protection Authority.

The app was introduced by some Norwegian authorities to limit the transmission of the coronavirus.

The data protection watchdog said on Friday that considering the low spread of the infection, among other issues, collecting data through the app could no longer be seen as reasonable amid privacy concerns.

The Norwegian Institute of Public Health said in a statement:

We don’t agree with the DPA’s evaulation, but feel it is necessary to delete all data and put work on hold as a result of this.

We will as a result weaken an important part of our preparedness against a spread in infection, as we now lose time for development and testing of the app.
 
Kuwait and Bahrain have rolled out some of the most invasive Covid-19 contact-tracing apps in the world, putting the privacy and security of their users at risk, Amnesty International says.

The rights group found the apps were carrying out live or near-live tracking of users' locations by uploading GPS co-ordinates to a central server.

It urged the Gulf states to stop using them in their current forms.

Norway has halted the roll-out of its app because of similar concerns.

The country's data protection authority said the app represented a disproportionate intrusion into users' privacy given the low rate of infection there.

Researchers at Amnesty's Security Lab carried out a technical analysis of 11 apps in Algeria, Bahrain, France, Iceland, Israel, Kuwait, Lebanon, Norway, Qatar, Tunisia and the United Arab Emirates.

Bahrain's "BeAware Bahrain" and Kuwait's "Shlonik" stood out, along with Norway's "Smittestopp", as being among the most alarming mass surveillance tools, according a report published on Tuesday.

Most contact-tracing apps rely solely on Bluetooth signals, but Bahrain and Kuwait's capture location data through GPS and upload this to a central database, tracking the movements of users in real time.

The researchers say Bahraini and Kuwaiti authorities would be able to easily link this sensitive personal information to an individual, as users are required to register with a national ID number. Other countries' contact tracing apps anonymise users.

Accessing such data could help authorities tackle Covid-19, but Claudio Guarnieri, head of Amnesty's Security Lab, said the apps were "running roughshod over people's privacy, with highly invasive surveillance tools which go far beyond what is justified".

Mr Guarnieri added: "They are essentially broadcasting the locations of users to a government database in real time - this is unlikely to be necessary and proportionate in the context of a public health response. Technology can play a useful role in contact tracing to contain Covid-19, but privacy must not be another casualty as governments rush to roll out apps."

Mohammed al-Maskati, a Bahraini activist who is the Middle East digital protection co-ordinator for the human rights group Front Line Defenders, said there was also a concern the information collected by the apps might be shared with third parties.

Bahrain's app was linked to a television show called "Are You At Home?", which offered prizes to users who stayed at home during Ramadan.

The issues uncovered by Amnesty's investigation are particularly alarming given that the human rights records of Gulf governments are poor.

"When you equip a repressive state with the means to surveil an entire population - whether it's in the name of public safety or not - you can be certain that it's only going to enhance their means of control and repression to then track down dissidents or anyone that they consider to be a public threat. And in a lot of places like the Gulf, that means activists," says Sarah Aoun, chief technologist at privacy campaign organisation Open Tech Fund.

There is also a concern that the technology will continue to be used after the threat of the coronavirus recedes, Ms Aoun adds.

"Historically, there's been no incentive for governments to limit their overreach into people's privacy. On the contrary, if you take a look at 9/11 and the aftermath of that, it essentially ushered a new era of surveillance in the name of protecting citizens. And this time is no different."

Mr Maskati says critics will be unable to rely on regulatory oversight bodies in Gulf states for protection.

"If privacy is violated in a country like Norway, I can resort to regional tools such as the European Court of Human Rights and European Committee of Social Rights. But in our region there is not any such tool. On the contrary, resorting to local authorities may present an additional risk."

Bahrain and Kuwait did not respond to the BBC's request for comment.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-53052395
 
Coronavirus: Health minister says app should roll out by winter

A government minister has said the NHS coronavirus contact-tracing app is "not a priority" and he was not sure it would be out by winter.

The app, which has been trialled on the Isle of Wight, was initially expected to launch nationally weeks ago.

Lord Bethell, the Minister for Innovation at the Department of Health and Social Care, said he was unable to give a date for its launch.

But he insisted that the trial "has gone very well indeed".

He was responding to questions at the Science and Technology Committee on Wednesday afternoon.

"We are seeking to get something going for the winter, but it isn't the priority for us at the moment," Lord Bethell said in answer to a question about the app.

He admitted that was "an expectation of management answer, saying I can't give you a date".

Lord Bethell said it was still the government's intention to launch it at some point.

Lord Bethell has just poured a bucket of icy water over the project that was supposed to be at the heart of the government's test-and-trace strategy.

At the beginning of May, the Health Secretary Matt Hancock said people had a duty to download the app, which was expected to be rolled out nationally by the end of the month.

Plenty of people warned at an early stage that telling people via an app notification to go into quarantine might not work.

Now it seems the Isle of Wight trial has confirmed that most prefer the more human touch of a phone call.

The team behind the app have an updated version ready to go which they feel addresses many of the concerns. But it looks as though ministers and the Test-and-Trace supremo Baroness Harding have decided to put the whole idea in the deep freeze. Don't bet on it coming back in the winter.

He also added that the trial on the Isle of Wight had shown that some people preferred humans to do the contact tracing.

"There is a danger of it being too technological and relying too much on text and emails, and alienating or freaking out people - because you're peddling quite alarming news through quite casual communication," he said.

Since the launch of the trial phase six weeks ago, there have been few official updates about any expected timeline, and reports that ministers are considering switching systems.

Lord Bethell said that because the disease's prevalence was currently relatively low, "we're not feeling under great time pressure, and therefore we're focusing on getting the right app".

He added: "I won't hide from you that there are technical challenges with getting the app right, and we are really keen to make sure that we get all aspects of it correct."

He also acknowledged that the public were highly concerned about the app, which he said was one reason an app had not been "rushed" out.

"If we didn't quite get it right the first time round, we might poison the pool and close down a really important option for the future."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53083340
 
The NHS has abandoned a near three month attempt to build a centralised coronavirus contact-tracing app and will instead switch to the model preferred by the technology firms Apple and Google.

The embarrassing U-turn comes after officials concluded it was technically impossible to create an effective app that did not conform to the Google and Apple model, but that a straight switch to their model would not solve all the problems.

They said there were also significant problems with the Google–Apple approach and they hoped to find a “third way” by working with the two firms to create a tracing app that would work.

The idea behind the app was to track anybody that a person with coronavirus symptoms came into close contact with, using the Bluetooth connectivity on their smartphones.

But the ditched app designed by the government only recognised 4% of Apple phones and 75% of Google Android phones during the weeks of testing on the Isle of Wight.

While the alternative Google-Apple model identified 99% of phones, it could not accurately measure the distance between two phones, making it unclear when somebody would fall in or out of the 2-metre physical distancing range.

Officials would not immediately disclose how much money had been spent on developing the failed app. No launch date for the new app has been announced, but officials are hoping for a contact-tracing app based on the Google-Apple model to be launched in the autumn or winter.

The NHS had hoped to build an app that kept an anonymised central database of anybody an infected person had come into contact with. But Apple and Google refused to endorse that approach and said they would only redesign their operating systems for governments that used a decentralised approach, where no data was held in a single official database.

NHS developers spent weeks trying to find a way of making their approach work, but it failed because once Apple phones had “gone to sleep” because they were inactive, they stopped communicating via Bluetooth.

Matt Hancock, the health secretary, had promised the app would be ready by mid-May and reports in the Guardian that the government was considering switching were vehemently denied.

But on Wednesday the digital minister James Bethell admitted the app would not be ready until winter, a sign of how little practical progress had been made. There have been so many delays that administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland had not confirmed they would use the app.

The decision to switch to the Google-Apple model will have wide-ranging ramifications for the government’s contact-tracing programme. The Californian tech companies’ unbending rules greatly limit the amount of data the NHS can access, preventing the health service from using the app to increase its understanding of the spread of coronavirus around the UK.

Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary, said: “This is unsurprising and yet another example of where the government’s response has been slow and badly managed. It’s meant precious time and money wasted.

“For months tech experts warned ministers about the flaws in their app, which is why we wrote to Matt Hancock encouraging the government to consider digital alternatives back in May.”

Earlier this week Germany launched its own contact tracing app based on the Google-Apple model. On its first day, it was been downloaded 6.5m times.

The new model will force a shift in focus: the current contact-tracing app operates on a two-tier system, where users are notified if they have been in contact with someone with Covid-19 symptoms, and then warned again if that person has a positive test. That choice was made in part because the government wanted to minimise the delay between onset of symptoms and sending out a notification.

Without a centralised gatekeeper to prevent malicious users from falsely claiming they have symptoms, the NHS will be forced to only allow users who have a positive test result to send out exposure notifications – a problem cited by GCHQ as one of the main reasons to use a centralised model in the first place.

The switch will also do little to solve one of the most pressing problems, which has plagued not only the Isle of Wight tests, but other contact-tracing apps around the globe: the fact that the Bluetooth signal the app relies on is an unreliable way of estimating distance.

This problem, which is unrelated to whether the app uses a decentralised or centralised approach to data, means two phones kept in pockets on a crowded train can “think” they are very far away from each other despite being within 2 metres, while two phones in active use outdoors can “think” they are very close, even if they are in fact well out of the danger zone.

Sal Brinton, the Lib Dem health spokesperson in the Lords, said: “Lord Bethell and Dido Harding [who is in charge of the test and trace programme] have already said that it will be some months before England has that full service, probably winter. We need it now, and changing to an app that still has technical issues with Bluetooth distracts from the importance of fast, effective tracing by experts.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...irus-app-in-favour-of-apple-and-google-models
 
Apple says it did not know the UK was working on a "hybrid" version of the National Health Service coronavirus contact-tracing app using tech it developed with Google.

The firm took the unusual step of saying it was also unaware of an issue regarding distance-measuring, which was flagged by Health Secretary Matt Hancock in Thursday's daily briefing.

Apple said it was "difficult to understand" the claims.

Downing Street said the government had "worked closely with Apple and Google".

In tests carried out in the UK, there were occasions when software tools developed by Apple and Google could not differentiate between a phone in a user's pocket 1m (3.3ft) away and a phone in a user's hand 3m (9.8ft) away.

During the briefing, Mr Hancock said: "Measuring distance is clearly mission critical to any contact-tracing app."

However, speaking to the Times, Apple said: "It is difficult to understand what these claims are as they haven't spoken to us."
 
Irish Republic set to launch contact-tracing app

The Irish Republic plans to press ahead with the launch of a coronavirus contact-tracing app based on Apple and Google's technology, despite concerns raised about the tech's accuracy in its current state.

The Health Service Executive told the BBC that it would submit a memo to government this week, and "subject to approval" would launch its Covid Tracker app shortly after.

The UK government has said it is worried about false alerts, while researchers advising the Irish effort have also questioned whether the software should be rolled out in its current state.

Read the full story here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53137816
 
France released its StopCovid app on 2 June to help track and trace infected people across the country. Digital Minister Cédric O declared it had got off to a "very good start" the next day, with more than 600,000 downloads.

In a press conference today, the minister said this was now up to 1.9 million people. This is less than 3% of France's population of roughly 67 million people.

Of those users, only 68 have declared themselves positive with the virus through the app. Nearly half a million have deleted the app since downloading it.

Germany launched its coronavirus app last Tuesday and appealed to the public to sign up. On Monday the public Robert Koch Institute reported it had been downloaded 11.8 million times.
 
Northern Ireland to launch separate contact-tracing app

Northern Ireland is planning to release its own coronavirus contact-tracing app within weeks, the BBC has learned.

It follows the failure of the National Health Service app in England, which was trialled on the Isle of Wight.

The NI app will be based on the Google/Apple model. It is designed to be compatible with an app due to be released soon in the Republic of Ireland.

The Apple and Google model is more privacy-focused but provides less data to epidemiologists than the centralised version that England was trialling - although that was ditched last week as the government made a U-turn.
 
Yes, Apple/Google COVID-19 Tracking Is Now On Your Phone—Here’s The Problem

When Apple and Google updated their operating systems to include an exposure notification API, they mandated a privacy-first approach for any governments that wanted to access the framework. Those that do not comply can still make use of basic tech on the phones, but it is fraught with technical challenges. If you’re a virologist or epidemiologist arguing that you need data to fight the spread of infection inside your country, you’re out of luck. Apple and Google have said no.

Australia has now rejected the Apple and Google framework embedded in the latest versions of Android and iOS, deciding to keep its COVIDSafe app independent. The reason is simple, the Apple/Google model “fundamentally changes the locus of control and takes out the middle person,” Australia’s Deputy Chief Medical Officer Nick Coatsworth complains. That middle person is critical—it’s the manual contact tracer, the expert, “the people who have kept us safe,” as Coatsworth puts it.

COVIDSafe has technical challenges given its lack of access to the technology that Google and Apple control. But the government has judged that this is better than the data compromises involved in toeing the U.S. giants’ line. That's a powerful statement. The population is inevitably less safe given the standoff.

Most Popular In: Cybersecurity

Warning—Apple Suddenly Catches TikTok Secretly Spying On Millions Of iPhone Users
New TikTok Ban Suddenly Hits Millions Of Users As Serious Problems Get Worse
Microsoft Scores Stunning Strike Against Zoom With Major New Feature
France has always insisted on a sovereign contact tracing app, snubbing the Apple and Google alternative. It claims to have made the technology work, despite the decision to go it alone. Unfortunately, just as France has snubbed Apple and Google, so the French population have snubbed the app. Take-up is always a challenge for apps that need a WhatsApp-size install base to be effective. But in France, the take-up is woeful, and, worse, many of those that have installed the app are now deleting it.

Earlier this month, the U.K. government made headlines when it seemed to be abandoning its own digital contact tracing app for the Apple/Google alternative. But that’s not what happened at all. The U.K. has rejected the privacy-first approach mandated by the U.S. tech giants, it wants a more expansive Australia-style system. But with Apple and Google restrictions it cannot make this work. And so it has essentially deprioritized its tracing app in favour of manual alternatives.

PROMOTED

SAP BRANDVOICE | Paid Program
Why Some Supply Chains Haven’t Failed As Badly As Others
Civic Nation BRANDVOICE | Paid Program
This Pandemic Does Not Define You
Grads of Life BRANDVOICE | Paid Program
Putting People First To Rebuild A Stronger Economy: A Conversation With Ochsner Health
A much more notable rejection of Apple/Google has come from Singapore. Let’s remember, it was Singapore that initiated privacy-friendly Bluetooth contact tracing in the first place. Its Trace Together scheme came first and was the first to encounter the limitations of such schemes—lack of take-up and compliance, and more critically a lack of data for the virologists and epidemiologists to work with, to fight the virus.

Even compliant Singapore couldn’t make it work. And so the city state has now expanded its program to be much more invasive than it was before, a far cry from the decentralized, anonymized, arms length approach mandated by Apple and Google.

First came SafeEntry, a check-in scheme for Singapore’s citizens to provide their identification when they visit locations including workplaces, schools, retail outlets, hotels and even healthcare facilities. There are penalties for businesses failing to enforce the scheme. It is a complete rejection of anonymized digital tracing as an effective means by which coronavirus infections can be contained.

Now Singapore has gone another step further, adding Bluetooth tokens to its Trace Together scheme. These are designed to fill the gap in take-up, where citizens do not have capable smartphones—especially the elderly and vulnerable. The government assures that data captured by the devices will be encrypted and kept for only 25 days, that the tokens cannot record GPS locations or transmit data. But it is a government issued device outside the privacy-first Apple/Google framework.

You can see where this is going. It’s yet another initiative that has been introduced in the real world, but which is a world away from the fantasyland where 80% of smartphone owners install and comply with a decentralized app that does not provide the health authorities with any context or modelling data, and which precludes any form of monitoring or compliance.

Ironically, the Trace Together tokens sound more dystopian than they actually are. They carry no more of a privacy threat than smartphone apps. But they are hugely symbolic of a real-world deployment of digital contact tracing where lessons have been learned and technology has been adapted. And, ultimately, the real failure of the Apple/Google mandate is that there is no room for debate, the rules have been laid down, and governments have lost the room to manoeuvre as they see fit.

It would not have been difficult to create a centralized, cloud-based framework that did enable data to be collected and modelled, that provided the ability for some levels of monitoring and even some forms of mandatory compliance if needed. This could have been open-source, outside the purview of those regimes whose surveillance aspirations pushed the privacy-first, decentralized model in the first place.

That hasn’t happened. I live in the U.K., where the first wave of coronavirus caused chaos. The digital contact tracing app was seen as a significant safety measure to help the country safely back to its new normal. Now those plans are in tatters, and so the country is emerging from its lockdown with no such safety measure in place. Apple and Google may have safeguarded the world’s population from the purely theoretical risk of a COVID-19 surveillance nightmare, but at what cost?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2020/06/29/serious-new-blow-for-apple-and-google-as-covid-19-phone-tracking-is-rejected/#222db33d67cc
 
Iphone-> settings->Privacy->heallth

Android->settings->settings->google>settings.

After the latest update, I first thought it was some lame forward but after the update its there..
 
Israel approves temporary mobile phone tracking of COVID-19 carriers

Israel's parliament has voted to allow the country's domestic intelligence agency to track the mobile phones of coronavirus carriers for the next three weeks amid a resurgence in new cases.

The new law allows the Shin Bet national security agency to access carriers' phone location data for 14 days before they were diagnosed. That data is used to identify anyone they came into contact with, which proponents say is crucial to identify new cases.
 
Google says 20 US states, territories 'exploring' contact tracing apps

Alphabet Inc's Google says 20 US states and territories, representing about 45 percent of the country's population, are "exploring" contact tracing apps using a tool it developed with Apple Inc.

In addition, the company said public health authorities in 16 countries and regions outside the US had launched apps using the Apple-Google tool, up from 12 previously. They include Austria, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Gibraltar, Italy, Ireland, Japan, Latvia, Northern Ireland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland and Uruguay.

The technology enables app users to track encounters with other people through Bluetooth signals and anonymously notify contacts if they later become infected with the virus.

Google said the first of the US apps would be released in the "coming weeks", but declined to name the states. It added that its system with Apple now enables apps launched by different countries to talk to each other, allowing contact-logging to continue even when users cross borders.
 
Coronavirus: England's contact-tracing app gets green light for trial

England's revamped coronavirus contact-tracing app is set to begin public trials on Thursday.

The software will be based on Apple and Google's privacy-centric method of one smartphone detecting another.

Engineers are still trying to reduce how often the Bluetooth-based tech wrongly flags people as being within 2m (6.6ft) of each other.

Officials are concerned about people going into quarantine as a consequence.

The Isle of Wight will be involved again, along with one other area and a volunteer group. The government intends to launch the experiment without much fanfare, because it is still not clear when a formal national rollout will occur.

The idea behind the app is to use people's phones to log when they have been close to another person for so long, that there is a high risk of contagion.

If one user is later diagnosed with the disease, the other person can be alerted to the fact before they begin exhibiting symptoms.

In addition, users will also be asked to scan a QR barcode when they enter a property, to provide a means to later alert them to the fact that they visited a location linked to multiple infections.

"We need the app to help stop transmission by tracing close-proximity contacts as quickly and as comprehensively as possible, capturing those contacts we don't know or don't remember meeting," Prof Christophe Fraser, a scientific advisor to the Department of Health from Oxford University, told the BBC.

"The app should enable us to return to more normal daily activities with the reassurance that our contacts can be rapidly and anonymously notified if we get infected."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53753678
 
Harinder Kaur was not surprised when people slammed their doors in her face as she walked into neighbourhoods in the northern state of Punjab armed with a smartphone and a long list of health and travel-related questions.

The 28-year-old health worker had been told to go door-to-door in villages in Patiala district and help populate the state's COVID-19 tracing app with "thousands of details" people were unwilling to share, from their digestive health to their mobile numbers.

"People were just hostile," said Kaur, who is one of more than one million Accredited Social Health Activists, or ASHA workers, on the front lines of India's battle to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus.

"We didn't want to download the app, but our concerns were ignored," Kaur said in a phone interview.

"There is so much information the app wants from every individual, including pictures. Many are just scared to give it now and threaten us if we persist."

Considered key tools in stemming the pandemic, the rollout of Punjab's Corona Virus Alert (COVA) app and the dozens of tracing apps being used by different Indian states has been mired in concerns over privacy issues.

I am not sure if using the app helped bring down cases.

According to a new report released this month by Tandem Research, an independent research collective, there are at least 85 tech tools being used to support the public health response in India.

At least half of them are mobile apps, say digital rights campaigners.

Health workers and lawyers say they are worried about the lack of privacy policies in the apps, as well as the use of open-source software and unclear terms on issues like data retention and sharing.

The apps use Bluetooth and GPS on smartphones to evaluate a user's risk of infection based on their location and their medical and travel history.

Many of India's state apps were launched even as the central government brought out its coronavirus contact-tracing app Aarogya Setu, or "Health Bridge", in early April, which has been downloaded by more than 152 million people, according to the National Informatics Centre (NIC).

"While Aarogya Setu has faced significant scrutiny, not much is known about how the state apps work," said Devdutta Mukhopadhyay, a lawyer with New Delhi-based digital rights group Internet Freedom Foundation.

"Many of them do not have a specific privacy policy and there is no transparency about how these apps collect, process, store or share personal data."

The NIC, the organisation within the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology that has been collaborating with many state governments on the development of their apps, did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

However, officials in the states of Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Himachal Pradesh told the Thomson Reuters Foundation that their apps had privacy policies in place and the data collected was secure.

Pandemic and privacy

In late February, Ravi Bhagat and his team were asked to develop an app that would work as an administrative and awareness tool to fight the pandemic.

"We had a deadline of less than a week to come up with something," said Bhagat, CEO of the Punjab government's e-governance cell.

"We studied the South Korea and China models, looked at our requirements, and had it up and running," he added, noting that the app has been downloaded by more than five million people.

Down south in Tamil Nadu state, Azhagu Pandia Raja modified a game he had been creating into a coronavirus tracking app for the government within a week of being assigned the job in March.

"It was a challenge for us because it was an emergency and a question of people's health," said Raja, a research fellow with the Chennai city government.

In this race to get the technology up and running, personal data concerns were overlooked, say privacy rights advocates.

A report released in April by the non-profit Software Freedom Law Center has warned about the "excessive collection and processing, and unauthorised sharing of personal data, unbridled surveillance and tracing of people" by state apps.

Looking at the apps' policy documents, the researchers at the New Delhi-based organisation found that many did not have terms of service accessible to users, limiting the governments' liability in case of "misuse of the data collected".

Personal data rules under India's Information Technology Act mandate that all such apps have comprehensive privacy policies, said Prasanth Sugathan, the charity's legal director.

"Privacy policies have to be very specific in apps like these, but many circumvented the law by being vague to just tick the box," he said in emailed comments.

"There are no consent clauses for contact tracing, storage of data [or] the role of private players involved - how can the data be deleted or rectified? These apps are like black holes."

'The extra mile'
Both Bhagat and Raja said these worries were unfounded.

"We knew that privacy would be an issue and therefore went the extra mile to make sure the data was secure," Bhagat said.

He explained that Punjab's app holds the data on the users' phones, not on a central server - which could be more easily hacked or leaked - and that anyone with access to the data has to sign a non-disclosure agreement.

"The data will be kept till COVID is [gone] and then deleted," he added.

Officials also told the Thomson Reuters Foundation that the data being collected is very basic and as such does not need separate privacy clauses.

"We are collecting rudimentary information already available on other government portals," said Rajneesh, who goes by one name and heads Himachal Pradesh state's information technology department, which developed the app called Corona Mukt Himachal.

"These apps have been helpful in many ways - from tracking quarantine violators to updating elected representatives down to the village level about cases and aiding health workers."

In the northern Haryana state, about 20,000 ASHA workers have been on strike since early August, demanding the government provide them with smartphones to download coronavirus tracking apps and incentivise them for the data they collect.

Meanwhile, two petitions have been filed by employers and social activists in the High Court of Kerala against the central government's order making it mandatory for public and private sector employees returning to work to download the Aarogya Setu app.

Along with privacy concerns, the petitions, both of which have been tagged together and are scheduled for a hearing in September, also question the accuracy and efficiency of the app.

Kaur has been asking herself the same questions lately, as India's coronavirus cases crossed the three-million mark over the weekend, making it the worst-affected country in Asia, and third behind Brazil and the United States globally.

"I am not sure if using the app helped bring down cases," Kaur said.

https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/...lack-holes-covid-19-apps-200826135111352.html
 
900,000 in Finland download virus tracing app

Finnish health authorities have said that some 900,000 people have downloaded a coronavirus tracing app a day after it was launched.

The Koronavilkku app is aimed at finding out whether a person has been exposed to the coronavirus, the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare said, adding that the free-of-charge application was created to help break infection chains.

App users send a randomly generated code via Bluetooth to others when in close contact.
 
Coronavirus: 'Government must publish contact-tracing app data'

A leading health charity is demanding details about how England and Wales' contact-tracing app fared in tests.
The app is due to launch on Thursday.
It has been trialled in the London Borough of Newham as well as the Isle of Wight, but data from from the pilots has not been made public.
The Health Foundation said it was particularly concerned the tech could exacerbate existing inequalities, leaving some people at greater risk of being infected.
The government has responded saying: "We have spoken with groups with protected characteristics, such as age, ethnicity and disability, those experiencing health inequalities and those groups particularly impacted by coronavirus."
Diverse test group
The NHS Covid-19 app has been in development since March in one form or another, and follows the release of parallel contact-tracing smartphone software in Northern Ireland and Scotland.
Among other functions, they use Bluetooth signals to determine when two people have been close together for five minutes or more, so that if one is later diagnosed as having the virus the other can be sent an alert telling them to self-isolate.

Two different versions of the app have been tested in the Isle of Wight.
The most recent release was also trialled in Newham specifically because of the wide diversity of the area's 267,066 residents.
According to the Department for Health's Test and Trace team, which is responsible for the initiative:
83% of the local population identify as "black, Asian and minority ethnic" (BAME)
40% have reported a disability or health condition
69% are aged between 18 to 64
The Newham test began in late August, but its findings have not been made public, leading the Health Foundation to call for greater transparency.
The charity called attention to a previously unreleased Ipsos Mori poll, which it said indicated that participants from black and minority ethnic backgrounds, women, younger and older age groups, and unemployed people were all among those with a relatively low awareness of the app.

"Piloting the app in Newham was an opportunity to understand how it works among different populations," it said.
"But without publication of any findings from the pilot study, we do not know whether these major concerns have been addressed."

It added that one worry was that those who did not use the app would not benefit from up-to-date information about their risk of infection from others, potentially putting them more at risk.
While the Track and Trace team has not published its results, it has detailed some of the steps it intends to take to encourage the app's adoption, including:
working with influencers who are popular with minority groups
making sure it is advertised in a way likely to reach diverse communities
creating partnerships with employers, businesses and health organisations.
The BBC has been told the app will also launch with more than the six languages the test version currently provides.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54256144.
 
NHS Covid-19 app: How England and Wales' contact-tracing service works

It has been a long time coming but England and Wales' Covid-19 app will launch on Thursday.
It follows in the footsteps of Scotland and Northern Ireland's own efforts but has more features.
Apple and Google's automated contact-tracing technology will be used to tell people to self-isolate if their phone detects they were near someone later determined to have the virus.
But there's more, including:
a venue check-in barcode scanner
a postcode-based risk-level checker
a symptoms-reporter tool
the means to order a coronavirus test and receive its results
a countdown timer to keep track of how long to stay in self-isolation
a guide to the latest advice on local restrictions, financial support and other related information
So while contact-tracing may seem like the headline feature, health chiefs say the primary goal is to change people's behaviour to make them less likely to catch or transmit the coronavirus.
How can people access the app?
The app is available for smartphones only - not tablets, smartwatches or other devices.
To get started, go to Android's Google Play or Apple's App Store and search for "NHS Covid-19".
The handsets must have Android 6.0 (released in 2015) or iOS 13.5 (released in May 2020) and Bluetooth 4.0 or higher.

And some of the latest Huawei handsets are excluded.
Users must confirm they are 16 or older to get started.
How will it send contact-tracing alerts?
When two devices running the app are close to each other, they exchange Bluetooth "handshakes" to determine the distance and duration, measured in sessions lasting five minutes.
The measurements are not always accurate - and work continues to improve them - but the logs are used to create a cumulative points score for the set of interactions between two people over the course of a day.
If the points threshold is met and one of the two owners later shares a positive coronavirus test via the app, then the other will receive an alert.
The formula above was used during the trial, but has since been tweaked to take account of when the person with Covid-19 was most infectious.
Further changes may be made over time.
What will this alert say?
The notification will tell the recipient to go into self-isolation for a fortnight - and trigger the start of the app's countdown clock.
But the recipient is not told who triggered the alert.
And the authorities cannot identify either party, although they can track how many people have been told to self-isolate.
Even if the recipient has no symptoms or a subsequent negative test result, they must stay at home for the duration.
How does Covid-19 test-and-trace work?
Can users be fined if they ignore a self-isolate alert?
From 28 September, people in England can be fined £1,000 or more for breaching self-isolation rules. The Department of Health has confirmed in theory this applies to app-delivered orders stay at home.
But because the app lets users remain anonymous and health chiefs want it to be popular, fines for users should not be an issue.
Alert levels graphic
Unlike when a human contact tracer orders someone to self-isolate, the app keeps the subject's identity a secret.
Only if they subsequently get in contact - for example to arrange a financial support payment - will their name be registered.
How will the venue check-in process work?
Restaurants, bars and other leisure facilities should display an authorised QR barcode on a poster or digital sign, which the app can scan.

The venue will then be added to the app's "digital diary" of places the user has visited.
And in England - but not Wales - the user will not need to give their name and address to the venue.
If officials later judge the location to be the centre of an outbreak, they can trigger an alert to users who were there.
And this notification might tell them to use the app's symptoms checker and/or self-isolate.
How will the postcode facility work?
When a smartphone owner first uses the app, they are given the option of typing in the first part of their postcode - "M23", for example.
Typically, thousands of other households will have the same code, so although this causes information to be shared with the authorities, it should not identify individuals.
Example of an app alert
image captionThe app can trigger notification alerts to warn the user if their local risk level has changed or if they have been linked to someone who has the coronavirus
The user is then given a risk-level for their neighbourhood, at the top of the app's home screen, and can be sent an alert if it changes.
And in turn, the NHS and local government can collect data about the numbers of app downloads and coronavirus cases in their area, helping them manage the crisis.
How will the app order a test?
Users can report symptoms - and when they started - at any time.
If they suggest infection, the user is told to book a test and that everyone in their household must self-isolate for eight days.
Booking a test involves using an external website, which asks for the user's name and address.
App can direct users to book a test
But these personal details are not shared back to the app.
And a unique code lets users receive their test result via the app as soon as it is ready.
Will the app drain the battery and data allowance?
The developers suggest the app should account for less than 5% of a device's battery use.
But if the phone is set to use a low-power mode, owners should go into their settings to exclude the app so it can continue contact tracing at all times.
And while the app is continually checking for updated data, the major networks have said they will not deduct usage from people's allowances.
What if users travel to Scotland or Northern Ireland, which have their own apps?
Apple and Google's framework will not allow two apps to contact trace simultaneously.
So when users cross the border, they need to open the local app and turn on contact tracing within it.
This will bring up a prompt asking: "Switch app for exposure notifications?"

Doing so, will turn off the one they were using beforehand.
What if users work with PPE or behind a perspex screen?
While users are normally encouraged to keep the app active and their phone to hand whenever out of the house, there are exceptions.
To avoid people being told to self-isolate when they were protected, or phones logging each other while in lockers, there is an option to temporarily turn off contact tracing, at the bottom of the home screen.
How will the app tie into other efforts?
While the human and automated contact-tracing systems are being deliberately kept separate, they should complement each other.
So, for example, if you were in a supermarket queue, human tracers might find it hard to identify the person next in line but the app would be able to.
Likewise, if you were at a pub where a contagious user was sitting but not using the app, you might still receive an alert via the check-in service.
Will it make any difference?
According to modelling done by the University of Oxford, the app can significantly reduce deaths and hospital admissions if at least 15% of the population use it.
But real-world data on how effective such apps have been in other countries using them is scant.
And so far, they have been offered when the levels of infection have been relatively low, meaning the chance of any user receiving an alert has been slim.
Most people have yet to be convinced to install them too - about a third of the population in Ireland, 22% in Germany and only about 4% in France have done so.
As Covid-19 resurges that may change.
And as health chiefs note, there are other measures of success, including whether those that do download the app regularly open it and then change their behaviour as a result.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54250736.
 
I downloaded the NHS app. My privacy is less important to me than doing my bit to contain this awful disease.
 
Singapore in world first for facial verification

Singapore will be the first country in the world to use facial verification in its national identity scheme.

The biometric check will give Singaporeans secure access to both private and government services.

The government's technology agency says it will be "fundamental" to the country's digital economy.

It has been trialled with a bank and is now being rolled out nationwide. It not only identifies a person but ensures they are genuinely present.

"You have to make sure that the person is genuinely present when they authenticate, that you're not looking at a photograph or a video or a replayed recording or a deepfake," said Andrew Bud, founder and chief executive of iProov, the UK company that is providing the technology.

The technology will be integrated with the country's digital identity scheme SingPass and allows access to government services.

"This is the first time that cloud-based face verification has been used to secure the identity of people who are using a national digital identity scheme," said Mr Bud.

Verification or recognition?
Both facial recognition and facial verification depend on scanning a subject's face, and matching it with an image in an existing database to establish their identity.

The key difference is that verification requires the explicit consent of the user, and the user gets something in return, such as access to their phone or their bank's smartphone app.

Facial recognition technology, by contrast, might scan the face of everyone in a train station, and alert the authorities if a wanted criminal walks past a camera.

"Face recognition has all sorts of social implications. Face verification is extremely benign," said Mr Bud.

Privacy advocates, however, contend that consent is a low threshold when dealing with sensitive biometric data.

"Consent does not work when there is an imbalance of power between controllers and data subjects, such as the one observed in citizen-state relationships," said Ioannis Kouvakas, legal officer with London-based Privacy International.

Business or government?
In the US and China, tech companies have jumped on the facial verification bandwagon.

For example, a range of banking apps support Apple Face ID or Google's Face Unlock for verification, and China's Alibaba has a Smile to Pay app.

Many governments are already using facial verification too, but few have considered attaching the technology to a national ID.

In some cases that's because they don't have a national ID at all. In the US, for example, most people use state-issued drivers' licences as their main form of identification.

China hasn't attempted to link facial verification to its national ID, but last year enacted rules forcing customers to have their faces scanned when they buy a new mobile phone, so that they could be checked against the ID provided.

Nevertheless, facial verification is already widespread in airports, and many government departments are using it, including the UK Home Office and National Health Service and the US Department of Homeland Security.

How will it be used?
Singapore's technology is already in use at kiosks in branches of Singapore's tax office, and one major Singapore bank, DBS, allows customers to use it to open an online bank account.

It is also likely to be used for verification at secure areas in ports and to ensure that students take their own tests.

It will be available to any business that wants it, and meets the government's requirements.

"We don't really restrict how this digital face verification can be used, as long as it complies with our requirements," said Kwok Quek Sin, senior director of national digital identity at GovTech Singapore.

"And the basic requirement is that it is done with consent and with the awareness of the individual."

GovTech Singapore thinks the technology will be good for businesses, because they can use it without having to build the infrastructure themselves.

Additionally, Mr Kwok said, it is better for privacy because companies won't need to collect any biometric data.

In fact, they would only see a score indicating how close the scan is to the image the government has on file.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54266602.
 
Dutch coronavirus app rolls out nationally Oct. 10 after months of talks
Nearly six months after talks started about an official Dutch coronavirus notification application, the CoronaMelder mobile app will be ready for use nationally on Saturday, the Cabinet said in a statement. The start date of October 10 was delayed by over seven weeks from its initial release date as the country continued to grapple with a shortage of test capacity to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infections.

Use of the app is voluntary. The app notifies users if they have been in the vicinity of someone infected with the virus for an extended period of time. CoronaMelder uses Bluetooth technology to detect other devices nearby with the app installed on them. When someone with the app tests positive for the viral infection, a worker from municipal health service GGD will ask the person if they want to use the app to notify others, something which is not obligatory.

Earlier on Tuesday, the Eerste Kamer, the upper house of Dutch parliament, voted to approve the temporary law which cleared approval of the apps use by a 51 to 19 majority. Far-right nationalist parties PVV and FvD voted against the proposal, along with animal rights party PvdD, Denk, and the independent factions Krol, Van Haga, and Van Kooten-Arissen.

“It's great that the use of CoronaMelder is being embraced by both Houses [of Parliament]. We must do everything we can to stop the spread of the virus," said Health Minister Hugo de Jonge following the vote. "The app can play an important role in this, so it is high time to start using it in the Netherlands now.”

The ministry said the app is additional to GGD source and contact tracing, and does not store location data. "Moreover, people should never be forced, directly or indirectly, by anyone to use the app," the ministry said.

The Eerste Kamer members voted unanimously to pass a motion calling for the CoronaMelder app to also be made available independently of Apple iOS and Android devices. Two amendments were also rejected, including one to delay the app's release until test capacity is expanded, and another to show statistical data about the app's usefulness when someone installs it on their device.

Months ago the app was made available for download, and has since been installed 1.3 million times. Practical testing began on August 17 in five regions of the Netherlands.

Source: https://nltimes.nl/2020/10/06/dutch-coronavirus-app-rolls-nationally-oct-10-months-talks.
 
At least 2.2 million people have downloaded the Dutch coronavirus app

The Dutch coronavirus tracing app was downloaded 700,000 times on Saturday, the day it went national, following last week’s senate vote in favour of using the alert-based system. In total, the app has now been downloaded 2.2 million times, health ministry officials said. The Netherlands has a population of over 17 million and experts say some 40% to 50% should use the app if it is to be effective at halting the spread of the virus. ‘I think at least 50% of the population should use it,’ Utrecht University epidemiologist Hans Heesterbeek told broadcaster NOS at the weekend. ‘Then you get a good reflection of the make-up of society. The CoronaMelder app, first mooted in early April, warns users if they have spent 15 minutes or more in close contact with someone who tests positive for the virus – as long as they have allowed that information to be used. It will not be compulsory to use the app, which works by exchanging random codes with other phones via Bluetooth technology.

English Health minister Hugo de Jonge commissioned the app to trace the spread of coronavirus in the wake of flopped efforts to fast-track the process in a weekend event in mid April and testing first started in June. The CoronaMelder had been due to go live on September 1, but that was cancelled because the emergency law authorising its use had not gone through parliament. The app is available in English as well as Dutch and there is information about how it works in a number of other languages online, including German, Polish and Turkish.

Source: https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2020/...le-have-downloaded-the-dutch-coronavirus-app/.
 
Around here the tracking data of the last 14 days is saved on your phone with encryption if you test positive then only are you asked to upload the data which then informs all the people that you were in contact with of possible infection and used for contact tracing. I think this is probably the best way to do this the choice between privacy and safety has always been in contention.
 
Coronavirus: Singapore schoolchildren must use Covid-tracing tech

Singapore pupils aged over seven must use the city state's contact-tracing app or wearable device from December.

Both use Bluetooth signals to log any contact with other users' devices.

Pupils do not always have access to their phones but free tokens that can be worn on a lanyard or carried are being given away at community centres.

It is part of a wider effort to enable conferences to restart and provide better tracing in higher-risk settings, such as busy hotels, cinemas and gyms.

Pupils will not be turned away from school if they forget or misplace the tokens.

And they are being asked to label them with their name as they are not water- or drop-proof so will need to be removed during some activities.

The government has already said the TraceTogether app or token will, however, be mandatory in workplaces, restaurants and shopping centres.

Advocates have also suggested the tokens could be better for privacy.

Users' data is stored on the token, purged regularly and sent to the Ministry of Health only after a positive coronavirus test.

Singapore's schools have been open since June, following a two-month closure.

And on Monday, the country recorded no local cases of Covid-19 and one imported case.

In the UK, all use of local contact-tracing apps is voluntary and there is no wearable alternative - although the idea has been explored.

And the National Education Union of teachers and support staff has said there has been a 50-fold increase in coronavirus infections in secondary schools since September.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54792187.
 
UK contact-tracing apps start to talk to each other

The United Kingdom's various contact-tracing apps can now intercommunicate, allowing people to be matched from the different areas they cover.

Until now, users needed to download separate Covid-19 apps and change settings if - for example - they travelled from England to Scotland.

Those who already have one of the apps do not need to do anything to make the new system work.

However, the apps do not communicate with other European equivalents.

The products that have become interoperable are:

England and Wales's NHS Covid-19
Northern Ireland's StopCOVID
Protect Scotland
Jersey COVID Alert
Beat COVID Gibraltar
The apps all use Bluetooth signals to log when two people's smartphones come into close proximity to each other.

These readings can then be used if one person becomes infected with coronavirus and registers the fact, to let others know if they were nearby for long enough to need to self-isolate.

All the apps are now able to access the anonymised IDs of people who tested positive because they have begun sharing a computer server set up by Scotland via Amazon Web Services.

However, those in charge stress that no personal information is being exchanged, and outside agencies - including the police and government - still have no way of identifying people from their use of the apps.

"While the majority of us will not be travelling under the current restrictions, this update will provide protection for those who have to continue to travel to other areas of the UK for essential reasons, such as work," blogged Gaby Appleton, director of product for Test and Trace at the Department of Health and Social Care.

"It is important to note that this update does not compromise our commitment to privacy."

Scotland's Health Secretary Jeane Freeman added that more than 13,000 people had already been alerted via its app that they had been in close contact with someone who had tested positive, and this update was "an important step in helping further reduce the spread of the disease".

European apps
The European Commission is pursuing a parallel effort to try and get other apps based on Apple and Google's contact-tracing tech to work together.

The first wave of apps to rely on its "gateway" began exchanging data a fortnight ago and more have been added since.

They include:

Germany's Corona-Warn-App
Ireland's COVID Tracker
Italy's Immuni
Latvia's Apturi Covid
Spain's Radar Covid
In theory, the commission believes 20 member states' apps could be made to work together because they are based on similar decentralised systems - meaning the contact-matching process takes place on the smartphones rather than on remote computer servers.

However, because Hungary's VirusRadar and France's StopCovid are based on different centralised technologies, there is currently no way to add them.

The UK's transition period after Brexit is set to come to an end this year, but it is not being deliberately excluded.

"The UK could theoretically participate until end-2020, but has not shown interest so far," a European Commission spokesman told the BBC.

"From 2021 on, participation would depend on a public health agreement between the EU and the UK."

The commission's initiative relies on the EU Directive on the application of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare, and this is not covered by the Withdrawal Agreement.

So, if the UK waits to join until after the year's end, this could complicate matters.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54826807.
 
Back
Top