Are you satisfied with Pakistan response to the Iranian attack?

Are you satisfied with Pakistan response to Iranian attack?


  • Total voters
    12

BouncerGuy

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 29, 2023
Runs
14,516
In the world of international politics, the recent event between Iran and Pakistan has caught everyone’s eye. People are talking a lot about how Pakistan reacted to Iran’s attack.

What do you think about the response, that Pakistan gave in reply to those attacks from Iran?

As far as my opinion is concerned, I think that it was a perfect response as no country is allowed to violate your sovereignty.

Vote and comments, please.
 
In the world of international politics, the recent event between Iran and Pakistan has caught everyone’s eye. People are talking a lot about how Pakistan reacted to Iran’s attack.

What do you think about the response, that Pakistan gave in reply to those attacks from Iran?

As far as my opinion is concerned, I think that it was a perfect response as no country is allowed to violate your sovereignty.

Vote and comments, please.
I feel it's an exaggerated response. Either you would have retaliated with a strike or just downgrade diplomatic ties but to do the both is just like fueling the fire and going towards further escalation.
 
I am fine with the response.

However, question really is what Iran will do now.
 
Iran started it. Iran had no good reason whatsoever to launch an attack in Pakistan. That was very random.

So, Pakistan's retaliation is understandable.

Things will be deescalated hopefully (like after that Afghan-Iran border incident).
 
I dont think anyone can really be satisfied by a militarh attack. Its something that should be avoided at all costs if possible.

Pakistan's reaction was understandable. Iran left them with no other option.
 
As a British citizen I feel it is going nicely for our small but influential islands of the west.
 
There was no need for sudden retaliation. Now, if we engage in any conventional war, we don't have enough resources, and the economy is already compromised.
 
The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulation Authority (PEMRA) on Thursday directed all the satellite TV channel licensees to exercise utmost care while reporting on tension between Pakistan and Iran.

The statement came hours after Pakistan carried out 'highly coordinated', 'precision strikes' on terrorist hideouts in Iran's Sistan-o-Balochistan province.

The retaliation came over a day after Tehran carried out missile and drone strikes in Pakistan's Panjgur. The strikes were launched the day Caretaker Prime Minister Anwaarul Haq Kakar met with the Iranian foreign minister on the sidelines of the WEF in Davos, Switzerland.

Caretaker Foreign Minister Jalil Abbas Jilani also received a telephone call from the Foreign Minister of Iran, Hossein Amir Abdollahian.

“All the licensees are directed to avoid telecasting/ breaking any unsubstantiated news on recent development surfaced between Pakistan and Iran,” PEMRA said in a letter addressed to all the licensees operating in news and current affairs and regional languages.

PEMRA stressed that the licensees should verify information related to the tension between Pakistan and Iran from relevant institutions before broadcasting or airing.

“Licensees are expected to present factual information/reports through their transmission and support state narrative at this crucial time as and when released from the relevant institution,” it added.

PEMRA stated that news and programming heads, along with their respective teams, should be vigilant in verifying information received on their desks or through communication channels, and air only after necessary fact-checking, as any false reporting may cause unrest and insecurity among the public.

It warned that if any violation is observed, reported, or identified through complaints, the authority shall be constrained to proceed under Section 26, 29-A and 30 of PEMRA Ordinance 2002 as amended by PEMRA (Amendment) Act-2023.

Source: Express Tribune

 
The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulation Authority (PEMRA) on Thursday directed all the satellite TV channel licensees to exercise utmost care while reporting on tension between Pakistan and Iran.

The statement came hours after Pakistan carried out 'highly coordinated', 'precision strikes' on terrorist hideouts in Iran's Sistan-o-Balochistan province.

The retaliation came over a day after Tehran carried out missile and drone strikes in Pakistan's Panjgur. The strikes were launched the day Caretaker Prime Minister Anwaarul Haq Kakar met with the Iranian foreign minister on the sidelines of the WEF in Davos, Switzerland.

Caretaker Foreign Minister Jalil Abbas Jilani also received a telephone call from the Foreign Minister of Iran, Hossein Amir Abdollahian.

“All the licensees are directed to avoid telecasting/ breaking any unsubstantiated news on recent development surfaced between Pakistan and Iran,” PEMRA said in a letter addressed to all the licensees operating in news and current affairs and regional languages.

PEMRA stressed that the licensees should verify information related to the tension between Pakistan and Iran from relevant institutions before broadcasting or airing.

“Licensees are expected to present factual information/reports through their transmission and support state narrative at this crucial time as and when released from the relevant institution,” it added.

PEMRA stated that news and programming heads, along with their respective teams, should be vigilant in verifying information received on their desks or through communication channels, and air only after necessary fact-checking, as any false reporting may cause unrest and insecurity among the public.

It warned that if any violation is observed, reported, or identified through complaints, the authority shall be constrained to proceed under Section 26, 29-A and 30 of PEMRA Ordinance 2002 as amended by PEMRA (Amendment) Act-2023.

Source: Express Tribune

Shows the bias, I’m sure it would had been ramped up had it been India.
 
It's bias to request channels substantiate news before releasing it?
? They would had been given free hand if it was India.
Substantiating should already be a thing the purpose of it being reiterated is what I’m pointing out.
 
‘It was our right’: Bilawal backs Pakistan’s ‘proportional’ response to airspace violation by Iran

Former foreign minister and PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Thursday endorsed Pakistan’s strikes in Iran after the western neighbour violated the country’s airspace, saying the response was “proportional and our right”.

Iran on Tuesday had launched attacks in Pakistan targeting what it described as bases for the militant group Jaish al-Adl in the border town of Panjgur in Balochistan, Iranian state media reported, prompting strong condemnation from Islamabad and downgrading of diplomatic ties.

The Iranian strikes were part of a series of attacks carried out by Iran in recent days in Syria and Iraq as a response to recent terrorist attacks on its territory. They have heightened concerns about regional stability, particularly amid ongoing conflicts in the Middle East.

Earlier today, the Foreign Office and the Inter Services Public Relations said military strikes were carried out against hideouts inside Iran used by terrorists responsible for recent attacks in Pakistan.

Questioned about Pakistan’s response and the overall incident in an interview with Dawn News, Bilawal condemned the Iranian violation and said, “No one should have the wrong idea that they can attack Pakistan or violate its sovereignty.

“I think Pakistan’s targeting of terrorist groups in Iran, our response was not only proportional but our right as a right to self-defence under international law.”

Bilawal expressed concern that the idea of the issue spiralling into a regional conflict was a “dangerous thought”, adding that any such escalation into a full-blown conflict would be dangerous for both Pakistan and Iran, as well as the region.

The PPP leader said he was surprised by the incident due to the high level of engagement he pursued with Iran as the foreign minister, adding that the progress of relations with the neighbour during his term exceeded even that in the past five to 10 years.

Regarding security concerns between the two countries, Bilawal said Pakistan’s stance was that Iran’s security was its own security, adding that the response was reciprocal.

“We devised different mechanisms to address each other’s concerns. We made many forums and modalities to talk with each other and find solutions together to such issues.”

Bilawal hoped that better sense would prevail and multiple pre-existing forums at various levels would be used to address current concerns between the neighbours.

“A trend has begun and we want to condemn it as well that there is a practice in our region to carry out an international activity to lift domestic pressure and appease our own people.”

Bilawal said there was pressure within Iran for various reasons but he said it would have been better if such an incident had not occurred due to the brotherly relations between the two countries.

He opined that Iran had carried out the attack to defuse its internal pressure and show that “it is doing something”.

“The whole nation and the country are standing with the armed forces and we have made clear and showed everyone that Pakistan does not compromise on its sovereignty.

“I hope we will stress on diplomacy on both sides so there is no escalation in this fight. The consequences of this will be dangerous for Pakistan, our neighbour and the region.”

Bilawal said it was neither in Iran’s nor Pakistan’s benefit to go to war and terrorism was a “joint issue” in the region that needed to be solved together instead of fought alone.

“If we accuse each other then the terrorists win [because] this is what they want that tensions and chaos spread in the region. It is our responsibility and Iran’s and other countries to not play into their hands and combat them together through engaging in diplomacy.”

Dawn

 
Not good enough, we should have attacked Tehran and dropped a few missiles and bombs there to send the message Pakistan is not to be messed with and that Pakistan is not Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria.
 
It's a retaliation that any sovereign country would show if you cross their boundary.

If Pakistan had remained silent they would need to be prepared for an even more significant attack next time.
 
It was a great response

I wasn't expecting it but I think munir is different sends clear messages , getting rid of afghan refugees is also a move no other leader made.


This attack also sends a message to afghanistan and India as well not to cross any red lines.

If we didn't respond all 3 would have taken turns to attack further.
 
This retaliation was much needed. Pakistan was not taken serious and everybody was trying to get the advantage, but now, the things will change,
 
If Pakistan didn't do it, they would've looked weak. So, it was understandable.

You shouldn't expect to do a missile strike inside a nuclear power nation and get away with it.
 
There were rumours in 2019 that India was planning to attack Pakistan in response to the Pulvama incident and Iran was going to facilitate India for this purpose.
 
There were rumours in 2019 that India was planning to attack Pakistan in response to the Pulvama incident and Iran was going to facilitate India for this purpose.

If true, it again underlines that it's an Ummah-Chummah out there.
 
Despite Pakistan protesting against Tehran’s recent airstrikes in a village in Panjgur district of Balochistan province, a senior administration official in Taftan town on Thursday told The Express Tribune that the Pakistan-Iran border remained open throughout the day.

He continued that routine trade activities and movement of the people was under way at the border.

"We have not been instructed to shut down the border,” the official added, requesting anonymity because he was not authorised to speak to the media.

Iranian authorities claimed to have targeted a militant camp being operated by the Sunni militant group Jaish al-Adl in the Pakistani territory.

Jaish al-Adl, or "Army of Justice", has carried out attacks inside Iran as well as on Pakistani government forces.

However, Pakistan condemned the attack describing it as a “blatant violation” of its airspace and said it had killed two children.

"[The missiles] fired by the Iranian forces landed at a house and killed two children,” Makran Division Commissioner Saeed Ahmed Umrani told The Express Tribune on the phone.

He said four people, including three children and a woman, were also injured in the attack.

"Women and children cannot live at a militant camp,” Umrani continued.

The bodies of the two children – a six-year-old girl and an 11-month-old boy -- were shifted to the District Headquarters Hospital Panjgur.

The four injured people were rushed to the hospital for medical treatment as well.

The commissioner maintained that the missiles had landed at the residence of one Kareem Dad alias Idrees.

In a related development, Pakistani envoy Mudassir Tipu on Thursday returned to Islamabad from Tehran.

A Pakistani delegation, participating in the Joint Border Commission (JBC) meeting in the Iranian port city of Chabahar, also came back to the country.

A day earlier, the spokesperson for Pakistan’s Foreign Office announced that Islamabad was recalling its ambassador to Iran over the strikes.

She added that Pakistan had asked the Iranian ambassador, who was visiting Tehran, not to return.

In response to the Iranian aggression, Islamabad had also decided to immediately suspend all official joint initiatives with Tehran.

The Pakistani delegation, led by Balochistan Customs Chief Collector Bashir Memon, was busy in the JBC meeting for the first day but it returned to the country soon after the airspace violation by the Iranian forces.

Members of the Quetta Chambers of Commerce and Industry (QCCI), provincial government officials and senior security officers were also part of the delegation.

"We are retuned in protest against the Iranian government’s attack [on our soil],” said QCCI President Abdullah Achakzai.

He added that the delegation was discussing a host of issues with the Iranian officials when the attack took place.

The two countries had established the JBC, which meets after every quarter to discuss issues relating to the Pakistan-Iran border.

Terrorism, human trafficking and trade have always been on the agenda of the commission’s meetings.

Pakistan has tightened security at around 900-kilometre border with Iran.

Frontier Corps and Levies have been deployed at the border to tackle any situation and timely respond in the case of any aggression from Iran.

Interim Balochistan Chief Minister Ali Mardan Domki also chaired a meeting to review the security arrangements as well as the law and order situation along the border with Iran.

Senior government and security officials attended the meeting.

The participants of the meeting decided to further tighten security in the areas bordering with Iran.

Source: Express Tribune

 
Jilani speaks to Iranian counterpart to defuse tensions

Caretaker Foreign Minister Jalil Abbas Jilani engaged in a crucial diplomatic conversation with his Iranian counterpart, Hossein Amir Abdollahian, on Friday, marking a significant turning point in the recent escalation of tensions between Pakistan and Iran.

According to a short statement issued by the foreign office, Jilani expressed Pakistan's commitment to fostering collaboration with Iran, emphasising the importance of mutual trust and cooperation, particularly in the realm of security.

The tensions escalated earlier in the week when Iran launched a missile strike against what it termed as hardline Sunni Muslim militants in Balochistan’s Pangur district bordering Iran. In a retaliatory move, Pakistan conducted air strikes against separatist militants inside Iranian territory, marking the first such incident since the Iran-Iraq war of 1980-88.

Sources close to the matter revealed that both Islamabad and Tehran were quick to recognise the need to de-escalate tensions, as the possibility of a full-scale conflict loomed large. The Express Tribune earlier reported that Pakistan, following its retaliatory strikes, extended a reconciliation message to Iran, emphasising its lack of interest in further escalating the situation.

Key regional players played a pivotal role in defusing the crisis, with China, Russia, and Turkey actively engaging in diplomatic efforts to prevent further escalation. The Iranian foreign ministry, in a late evening statement on Thursday, reaffirmed its commitment to good neighbourly ties with Pakistan and expressed its resolve not to allow external elements to strain the longstanding relationship.

The statement from Tehran was cautiously interpreted by Pakistani officials as a positive signal, marking the first indication that Iran was open to mending ties with its neighbour. Diplomatic sources revealed that behind-the-scenes efforts by influential regional countries played a crucial role in persuading both Pakistan and Iran to step back from the brink of conflict.

While there remains a sense of cautious optimism among Pakistani officials regarding the de-escalation, concerns linger over the specter of potential conflict. The recent coordinated and precision-guided strikes by Pakistan on terrorist hideouts inside Iranian territory underscore the gravity of the situation.

Source: Express Tribune

 
Jilani speaks to Iranian counterpart to defuse tensions

Caretaker Foreign Minister Jalil Abbas Jilani engaged in a crucial diplomatic conversation with his Iranian counterpart, Hossein Amir Abdollahian, on Friday, marking a significant turning point in the recent escalation of tensions between Pakistan and Iran.

According to a short statement issued by the foreign office, Jilani expressed Pakistan's commitment to fostering collaboration with Iran, emphasising the importance of mutual trust and cooperation, particularly in the realm of security.

The tensions escalated earlier in the week when Iran launched a missile strike against what it termed as hardline Sunni Muslim militants in Balochistan’s Pangur district bordering Iran. In a retaliatory move, Pakistan conducted air strikes against separatist militants inside Iranian territory, marking the first such incident since the Iran-Iraq war of 1980-88.

Sources close to the matter revealed that both Islamabad and Tehran were quick to recognise the need to de-escalate tensions, as the possibility of a full-scale conflict loomed large. The Express Tribune earlier reported that Pakistan, following its retaliatory strikes, extended a reconciliation message to Iran, emphasising its lack of interest in further escalating the situation.

Key regional players played a pivotal role in defusing the crisis, with China, Russia, and Turkey actively engaging in diplomatic efforts to prevent further escalation. The Iranian foreign ministry, in a late evening statement on Thursday, reaffirmed its commitment to good neighbourly ties with Pakistan and expressed its resolve not to allow external elements to strain the longstanding relationship.

The statement from Tehran was cautiously interpreted by Pakistani officials as a positive signal, marking the first indication that Iran was open to mending ties with its neighbour. Diplomatic sources revealed that behind-the-scenes efforts by influential regional countries played a crucial role in persuading both Pakistan and Iran to step back from the brink of conflict.

While there remains a sense of cautious optimism among Pakistani officials regarding the de-escalation, concerns linger over the specter of potential conflict. The recent coordinated and precision-guided strikes by Pakistan on terrorist hideouts inside Iranian territory underscore the gravity of the situation.

Source: Express Tribune


Looks like things are not escalating further. Good sign.

This should be resolved using diplomacy.
 
Foreign Ministers (FM) of Pakistan and Iran on Friday made second telephonic contact amid cross-border intrusions and heightened regional tension, ARY News reported.

In a telephonic conversation with Iran’s counterpart Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, FM Jalil Jilani expressed Pakistan’s readiness to work with Iran on all issues based on spirit of mutual trust and cooperation, according to a statement from the Foreign Office.

“He [FM Jilani] underscored the need for closer cooperation on security issues,” the statement read.

Earlier in the day, Pakistan’s Caretaker Foreign Minister Jalil Jilani said that Islamabad had no interest in escalating tensions with neighbouring Iran. He made these remarks during a telephonic conversation with Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkiye Hakan Fidan.

In a post on X, the Foreign Office said that the two discussed ongoing developments between Pakistan and Iran. FM Jilani shared Pakistan’s perspective and the recent happenings.

“Pakistan’s Operation Marg Bar Sarmachar was aimed at terrorist camps inside Iran,” he said.

Pakistan struck terrorist hideouts in Iran’s Sistan-Baluchestan province, less than 48 hours after Iran violated its airspace.

According to a statement issued by the military’s media affairs wing, “hideouts used by terrorist organisations namely Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF)” were struck in an intelligence-based operation codenamed ‘Marg Bar Sarmachar’.

“The targeted hideouts were being used by notorious terrorists including Dosta alias Chairman, Bajjar alias Soghat, Sahil alias Shafaq, Asghar alias Basham and Wazir alias Wazi, amongst others,” it added.

Pakistan Armed Forces remain in a perpetual state of readiness to ensure safety of Pakistan citizens against acts of terrorism, ISPR added.

Meanwhile, Iran’s IRNA news agency reported that nine people were killed in the attack targeting a village in the city of Saravan, with Iranian Interior Minister Ahmad Vahidi saying all the dead “were foreign nationals”.

On Tuesday, Iran launched attacks in Pakistan targeting – according to Irani regime – bases for the militant group Jaish al-Adl in the border town of Panjgur in Balochistan, prompting strong condemnation from Islamabad and downgrading of diplomatic ties.

Pakistan recalls ambassador

Following Iran’s violation of Pakistani airspace, the Foreign Office (FO) said Islamabad has announced to expel Iranian ambassador while recalling its envoy from Tehran.

“Pakistan reserves the right to respond to this illegal act and the responsibility for the consequences will lie squarely with Iran,” FO spokesperson Mumtaz Zahrah Baloch said in a post.

“Pakistan has decided to recall its ambassador from Iran and that the Iranian Ambassador to Pakistan who is currently visiting Iran may not return for the time being.

“Last night’s unprovoked and blatant breach of Pakistan’s sovereignty by Iran is a violation of international law and the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.

“We have conveyed this message to the Iranian Government. We have also informed them that. We have also decided to suspend all high level visits which were ongoing or were planned between Pakistan and Iran in coming days,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

Source: ARY

 
My view is that Pakistan emerged out of it with its reputation enhanced. They were really pushed into a corner with no option but to strike back. Pakistan were seen as a victim as the Iranian attacks came from nowhere and appeared clearly unprovoked. The fact that a couple of children were killed also meant the international sympathy was also with Pakistan. They waited, gauged the response and delivered these strikes within the appropriate amount of time.

Whatever reservations one may have about their government and armed forces - these strikes were a near perfect response.

One of things that has emerged out of this is - there is this halo/fascination/fetish around Iranian prowess and how powerful they are in the region. While they maybe good at using proxies and supporting various factions within their sphere of influence - it is clear that Pakistan destroyed this halo to smithereens when it comes to conventional warfare.

The real sad outcome out of all of this is the killings of women and children and I am pretty sure all sane minded Iranians and Pakistanis and everyone else would rather have preferred that these lives were spared.

Honestly Iran asked for it and got more than what they bargained for from Pakistan.
 
This is the sad state of the Ummah today. Instead of going for you know who we are fighting each other just for pride. Pathetic.
 
Iran got embarrassed once again, they clearly seem to be overestimating themselves.
 
The National Security Committee (NSC) meeting on Friday concluded that, in accordance with universal principles governing good neighbourly relations, Pakistan and Iran can address minor irritants through dialogue and diplomacy, further strengthening their historic ties.

The tensions escalated earlier in the week when Iran launched a missile strike against what it termed as hardline Sunni Muslim militants in Balochistan’s Pangur district bordering Iran. In a retaliatory move, Pakistan conducted air strikes against separatist militants inside Iranian territory, marking the first such incident since the Iran-Iraq war of 1980-88.

Earlier in the day, Caretaker Foreign Minister Jalil Abbas Jilani engaged in a crucial diplomatic conversation with his Iranian counterpart, Hossein Amir Abdollahian, marking a significant turning point in the recent escalation of tensions between Pakistan and Iran.

According to a short statement issued by the foreign office, Jilani expressed Pakistan's commitment to fostering collaboration with Iran, emphasising the importance of mutual trust and cooperation, particularly in the realm of security.

The NSC meeting, chaired by Caretaker Prime Minister Anwaarul Haq Kakar, focused on national security matters, as per a statement issued by the Prime Minister’s Office.

The forum conducted a comprehensive review of the situation and commended the armed forces of Pakistan for their professional, calibrated, and proportionate response to the unprovoked and unlawful violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty.

Participants in the meeting received briefings on political and diplomatic developments affecting the ongoing situation between Pakistan and Iran, discussing their impact on regional security. The forum also evaluated 'Operation Marg Bar Sarmachar,' successfully executed against Baloch terrorists of Pakistani origin residing in ungoverned spaces inside Iran.

An update on the border situation and the comprehensive preparations made to respond to any further violation of national sovereignty were also discussed.

The NSC reiterated an unwavering commitment to the absolute inviolability and sanctity of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity. The meeting emphasised that any attempt to breach it, on any pretext, would be met with the full might of the state.

Ensuring the security and safety of the people of Pakistan was declared paramount, and the state would spare no effort to guarantee it.

Recognising Iran as a neighbourly and brotherly Muslim country, the forum urged the utilisation of existing communication channels between the two nations to address mutual security concerns for the larger interest of regional peace and stability.

The meeting underscored Pakistan’s commitment to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries in accordance with the UN Charter and international norms. The committee reiterated its resolve to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations with an iron hand, emphasising that Pakistan has endured more than any other country due to this scourge.

In line with universal principles governing good neighbourly relations, the NSC expressed confidence that through dialogue and diplomacy, both countries could overcome minor irritants and further deepen their historic relations.

The meeting was attended by the Caretaker Ministers for Defence, Foreign Affairs, Finance, and Information, along with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, Chief of the Army Staff, Chief of Naval Staff, and Chief of Air Staff, as well as heads of intelligence agencies.

Source: Express Tribune

 
Unfathomable what Iran and Pakistan did, surely there must be some hidden facts, made a laughing stock of themselves
 
Unfathomable what Iran and Pakistan did, surely there must be some hidden facts, made a laughing stock of themselves
It seems more like a planned action otherwise i dont see any reason to act this way when Iran is already under the hammer of Israel and America
 
China reaffirms support to Pakistan’s sovereignty, territorial integrity

Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Sun Weidong on Saturday reaffirmed China’s support for Pakistan’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, economic development and progress, ARY News reported.

He was speaking at the inauguration of a photo exhibition and CPEC library at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs here.

“China would continue its support to Pakistan against any threat of terrorism,” the vice foreign minister said.

The remarks came after Pakistan struck terrorist hideouts in Iran’s Sistan-Baluchestan province, less than 48 hours after Iran violated its airspace.

According to a statement issued by the military’s media affairs wing, “hideouts used by terrorist organisations namely Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF)” were struck in an intelligence-based operation codenamed ‘Marg Bar Sarmachar’.

“The targeted hideouts were being used by notorious terrorists including Dosta alias Chairman, Bajjar alias Soghat, Sahil alias Shafaq, Asghar alias Basham and Wazir alias Wazi, amongst others,” it added.

Pakistan Armed Forces remain in a perpetual state of readiness to ensure safety of Pakistan citizens against acts of terrorism, ISPR added.

Meanwhile, Iran’s IRNA news agency reported that nine people were killed in the attack targeting a village in the city of Saravan, with Iranian Interior Minister Ahmad Vahidi saying all the dead “were foreign nationals”.

Today, the Chinese minister said that as iron brother and trusted friend, China attached special importance to Pakistan in its foreign policy and looked forward to further strengthening strategic ties between the two countries.

Thanking Pakistan’s support to China on its core issues, he reaffirmed China’s support for Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and for its economic development, progress and prosperity.

He appreciated Pakistan for its support for the One China principle, adding friendship of the two countries was time-tested and had across-the-board support among their people.

He said he brought books from China for the CPEC library including books written by President Xi Jinping on governance and the ancient Chinese culture. Sharing memories of his stay in Pakistan as ambassador in the last decade, he said the library was a reminder of the strength of the strategic partnership which was manifested through the CPEC projects.

The Chinese President inaugurated the CPEC project along with the leadership of Pakistan in 2015, he recalled, adding the leadership launched projects across Pakistan by signing more than 50 agreements.

The minister expressed his happiness over the completion of various projects under CPEC including highways, power plants and industrial parks, saying it was all made possible due to the strategic guidance of the leadership.

He said the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) by China was undertaken to bring shared prosperity to humanity.
“Through BRI, China envisioned to bring the countries together to face the current economic challenges and to turn challenges into opportunities,” he stressed.

The deputy foreign minister had arrived in Islamabad to attend the CPEC Joint Working Group meeting on Sunday.

In his remarks, Foreign Secretary Syrus Sajjad Qazi said CPEC remained foremost in the all-weather strategic cooperative relationship of Pakistan and China.

Welcoming Vice Foreign Minister Sun to Pakistan, the Foreign Secretary said that the Pakistan-China friendship enjoyed complete political, institutional and public support in Pakistan. Underscoring the salience of bilateral friendship for regional peace and stability, he expressed Pakistan’s readiness to further expand and strengthen bilateral ties in all areas of cooperation.

He said the China-Pakistan relationship was exemplified by commonality of interests. He invited other countries to invest in the industry, agriculture, science and technology projects under the CPEC.

The CPEC project was a tribute to the wisdom of leaders of different generations who contributed to strengthening of bilateral ties between Pakistan and China, he remarked.

The Secretary added that the shared vision of CPEC was meant to bring economic prosperity, regional connectivity and industrial growth.

Later, the Chinese Vice Foreign Minister and Foreign Secretary inaugurated the CPEC library and exhibition. Photos of various CPEC projects including Friendship Hospital, Vocational School and International Airport in Gwadar and East Bay expressway were put on display.

The East Bay expressway in the Gwadar region was an important infrastructure project connecting the port and free industrial zone with the national highway network.

Source: ARY

 
Director of the Indo-Pacific Security Programme Lisa Curtis at CNAS has warned that heightened tensions between nuclear-armed neighbours Pakistan and Iran have raised concerns in the United States, with fears of the situation spiralling out of control.

In an interview with VOA Deewa, Curtis, a seasoned foreign policy and national security expert, highlighted the motive behind Iran's recent incursion into Pakistan, linking the move to a retaliatory response following the double suicide bombing on January 3, an attack claimed by Dai’sh.

“So I think Iran needed to show that it will strike back when attacked and Pakistan, in some ways, is viewed as an easier target, allowing Iran to show its people a retaliatory response to the terrorist attack without provoking Israel or the US,” Curtis said.

Curtis stressed the importance of US concern for regional stability, cautioning against potential escalation. Amid existing tensions in the region, including between Pakistan and India, as well as with the Taliban, she warned of the possibility of chaos if not handled carefully.

"Pak-India tension is always high, there are also tensions between Pakistan and Taliban because they are avoiding cracking down Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) terrorists," she warned, expressing concerns about possible chaos if not handled carefully.

She asserted that Pakistan and Iran would have to diffuse the tensions, noting their apparent movement in that direction with Pakistan talking about brotherly relations and Iran also separating Pakistani people and officials from terrorists. She believes this indicates their joint efforts to de-escalate the current tense situation.

In response to a question about the timing chosen by Iran for intrusion in Pakistan, Lisa said it was intended to send an international signal. According to her, Iran aimed to demonstrate strength and resilience, reassuring the world that it remains formidable and ready to confront any aggression.

“Despite the recent terrorist attack, Iran sought to project strength, and unfortunately Pakistan happened to be one of the targets” she added.

While acknowledging recent moves by Pakistan and Iran towards de-escalation, Curtis emphasised that the region remains at risk. "Baloch separatists in Iran that have been attacked could retaliate inside Pakistan and so what will happen then?" Curtis questioned, highlighting potential risks despite the ongoing efforts for de-escalation.

Contrary to prevailing views, Lisa underscored the current problems Pakistan faces never allowing it to entangle in any regional conflict.

She pointed out key issues such as the country’s economic downturn, reliance on the IMF package, terrorist attacks and upcoming imminent polls, which comes at a time when the establishment’s reputation has suffered because it seems holding down the most populous party Pakistan Tehreek-Insaf (PTI) and incarcerated its chairman, Imran Khan.

Responding to a question regarding the future of Baloch terrorists, she underlined the counterproductive nature of resorting to terrorism. She emphasised that terrorist activities will make life worse for Baloch on either side.

She said that violent insurgencies will not help Baloch cause in any way, shape or form to gain any additional rights or economic benefits.

Discussing China's role in the current situation the senior expert observes that Chinese officials might believe they should be able to influence the situation. She asserted that when it comes down to it, they really can't influence regional developments as much as they might hope to.

“China only has so much influence and power in this kind of volatile situation, it enjoys strong and traditionally close relations with Pakistan, as well as endeavours to maintain positive ties with Iran, but its influence has limits," she asserted.

She emphasized that even with the strength of the China-Pakistan relationship, it's crucial to recognise the limitations of Chinese mediation. In her view, the effectiveness of Chinese involvement may not meet the expectations, particularly in complex and unstable situations.

Sharing her observations regarding the upcoming polls in Pakistan, she believes that there is a malaise about the political situation and the elections, with not much enthusiasm for the polls.

“There is a perception among the people of Pakistan that the establishment, seen as the centre of power, has picked the party of choice, and the popular PTI doesn’t stand much of a chance. Unfortunately, there is a lack of faith in the country’s democratic process,” Lisa raised concern.

She highlighted the downturn in Pakistan's economic situation and high inflation, which makes things more difficult. She believes there is a general kind of malaise in the country. Regarding security, she pointed out that TTP terrorists have also become a headache for Pakistan’s security institutions.

“There is deep frustration among the Pakistan security establishment about their lack of ability to influence the Taliban to crack down on TTP terrorists on its territory,” she claimed.

Curtis believes that the independent position taken by the Taliban, not feeling the need to answer to Pakistan or fulfil Pakistan's requests, is quite new and surprising for the Pakistani establishment. “A new situation is emerging in the region, and Pakistan is navigating its stance in light of a newly confident Taliban that now has options beyond the Pakistan military establishment," she added.

The senior security expert is not satisfied with the security situation in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) and Balochistan and believes that one of its reasons is the rise of the Taliban. She underscores the shared ideological attraction between the Taliban and various other terrorist groups, emphasising that this alignment in ideological principles allows these groups to operate more freely in Afghanistan, as the Taliban's control provides them with a relatively secure environment.

"The lack of pressure on terrorist groups, owing to the Taliban’s control in Afghanistan, is having a counterproductive effect. It is backfiring into Pakistan, leading to more insecurity and more Taliban-type influence happening in the region, impacting elections, the economy, and women and girls,” Curtis said.

She said that the oppression of women and girls under the Taliban regime in Afghanistan is indeed having a deep effect within Pakistan, where women and girls are also suffering because of this backward fundamentalist ideology that the Taliban is bringing to the region.

Source: Express Tribune

 
Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian is due to arrive in Pakistan on January 29, the Foreign Office here said.

The diplomatic relations of Pakistan and Islamic Republic of Iran have been restored, the two countries said in a joint statement.

The ambassadors of two countries could return to their offices by January 26.

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian will visit Pakistan on Jan 29, on invitation of his Pakistani counterpart Jalil Abbas Jillani.

Pakistan and Iran agreed to restore diplomatic ties and sending back to ambassadors to their postings after a standoff.

Foreign Minister Jalil Abbas Jilani and his Iranian counterpart Hossein Amirabdollahian in a telephonic conversation discussed return of the ambassadors back to their offices in respective capitals.

The foreign office in Islamabad said that the foreign ministers stressed over brotherly ties and bilateral cooperation.

Pakistan’s caretaker foreign minister urged that the respect of national solidarity and sovereignty should be the basis of cooperation.

The sides also agreed to de-escalate tensions.

The foreign ministers talked after both countries exchanged drone and missile strikes in each other’s territory.

The ***-for-tat strikes by the two countries are the highest-profile cross-border intrusions in recent years and have raised alarm about wider instability in the region since the war between Israel and Hamas erupted on Oct. 7.

Source: ARY

 
I was thinking that after Pakistan's retaliation, things would get worse. But I see here a diplomatic win for Pakistan.
 
I was thinking that after Pakistan's retaliation, things would get worse. But I see here a diplomatic win for Pakistan.

Neither country would gain anything by attacking each other. Glad common sense prevailed and peace was restored.
 
Back
Top