What's new

As Turkey raises Kashmir pitch, India reaffirms support for Cyprus' territorial integrity

300,000 Indians boycotting out of nearly 6 million visitors.

I am sure Turks are quaking in their boots.

It’s not just that.

While Thailand and all get mostly budget tourists, Turkey is visited by many affluent families who do destination weddings there and stuff like that, spend a lot of money.

This will make some dent to their tourism industry although it can never be said that it will bring them to knees.

But it will make a dent surely.

Also, Indian tourism is growing exponentially. Our visitors already doubled in just a few years. So it’s not just current losses but potential future losses. India’s real value always lies in its future potential as an economy about as large as China, US in size by the end of the century.
 
It’s not just that.

While Thailand and all get mostly budget tourists, Turkey is visited by many affluent families who do destination weddings there and stuff like that, spend a lot of money.

This will make some dent to their tourism industry although it can never be said that it will bring them to knees.

But it will make a dent surely.

Also, Indian tourism is growing exponentially. Our visitors already doubled in just a few years. So it’s not just current losses but potential future losses. India’s real value always lies in its future potential as an economy about as large as China, US in size by the end of the century.

Don’t worry, now the ppls from their dear friends country will visit most
 
India has officially arrived between Greece, Cyprus, Armenia and Turkey, Azerbaijan. The balance is tilting towards the Greeks now with full support from their Sanatani brothers.

Turkey and Azerbaijan better stay in their lane or they too shall get the taste of BrahMos very soon.
 
Indians are celebrating Modis visit to the superpower known as Cyprus. What an utterly amazing couple for Modi. This will surely rile up Turkey
 
Turkiye Missile Test Base in Somalia:

Defense expert Turan Oguz emphasized the strategic importance of Somalia for Türkiye’s missile testing program. "We successfully tested up to 550 kilometers over the Black Sea, but conducting tests beyond 1,000 kilometers requires specific geographical conditions. Somalia is one of the top three global locations for such tests because of its access to open ocean areas," Oguz explained.

Oguz highlighted Türkiye’s current development of ballistic missiles with ranges between 1,000 and 3,000 kilometers and underscored Somalia’s vital role in facilitating these tests.

  1. Turkiye has clearly breached the threshold of longer range missile development where they are unable to test their missiles within Turkiye beyond 700KM (available nationally)
  2. All ballistic missiles operate at hyper-sonic speeds at some point but it is hyper sonic maneuverability which is the edge and Turkiye has decided to label "Tayfun 4" as hyper sonic and not its previous variants so Tayfun is likely able to perform hyper sonic maneuverability which distinguishes it from its predecessors.

turkish-tayfun-block-4-missile.jpg


I have no doubt that Indians will be moaning about cooperation between Pakistan and Turkiye and there are brotherly relations but Tayfun 4 is different to anything Pakistan has in its arsenal and for different purpose.

The real cooperation between the brothers is in the drone development and manufacturing and not missiles.
 
Turks themselves are occupiers of Anatolia. Rich coming from them talking about occupation from other countries.
They should all go back Central Asia with their sheep wool clothing before lecturing others.
 
Turkiye Missile Test Base in Somalia:

Defense expert Turan Oguz emphasized the strategic importance of Somalia for Türkiye’s missile testing program. "We successfully tested up to 550 kilometers over the Black Sea, but conducting tests beyond 1,000 kilometers requires specific geographical conditions. Somalia is one of the top three global locations for such tests because of its access to open ocean areas," Oguz explained.

Oguz highlighted Türkiye’s current development of ballistic missiles with ranges between 1,000 and 3,000 kilometers and underscored Somalia’s vital role in facilitating these tests.

  1. Turkiye has clearly breached the threshold of longer range missile development where they are unable to test their missiles within Turkiye beyond 700KM (available nationally)
  2. All ballistic missiles operate at hyper-sonic speeds at some point but it is hyper sonic maneuverability which is the edge and Turkiye has decided to label "Tayfun 4" as hyper sonic and not its previous variants so Tayfun is likely able to perform hyper sonic maneuverability which distinguishes it from its predecessors.

turkish-tayfun-block-4-missile.jpg


I have no doubt that Indians will be moaning about cooperation between Pakistan and Turkiye and there are brotherly relations but Tayfun 4 is different to anything Pakistan has in its arsenal and for different purpose.

The real cooperation between the brothers is in the drone development and manufacturing and not missiles.
Pakistan still thinks is part of the Ottoman caliphate. Why else would they have the crescent and star on their flag and name their missiles with Turkic Lootereys. They joined forces with the same people that looted and subjugated their ancestors.
 
Pakistan still thinks is part of the Ottoman caliphate. Why else would they have the crescent and star on their flag and name their missiles with Turkic Lootereys. They joined forces with the same people that looted and subjugated their ancestors.

The "Non-Muslim natives" in subcontinent were either defeated by Muhammad Bin Qasim who was an Arab or converted in South India by Arab traders.

My ancestors were neither defeated by Turks nor we ever faced them in battle before Islam but here is my stance on being defeated by Muslims in battle and then accepting Islam.​


images

  1. Proud of being defeated by Muslims in battle
  2. Proud of accepting Islam
 

The "Non-Muslim natives" in subcontinent were either defeated by Muhammad Bin Qasim who was an Arab or converted in South India by Arab traders.

My ancestors were neither defeated by Turks nor we ever faced them in battle before Islam but here is my stance on being defeated by Muslims in battle and then accepting Islam.​


images

  1. Proud of being defeated by Muslims in battle
  2. Proud of accepting Islam
Just a quick check. Bin Qasim only conquered Sindh in 712 AD. Arab reign was short lived. Arabs were expanding more towards North Africa and Spain/Portugal after that. Hindu Rajas quickly took over until Turks under the leadership of Ghaznavi defeated Hindu Rajas of modern day Pakistan and occupied the entire modern day Pakistan and a big part of North India in 12th century. In the process converted boat loads of people.
After Arabs left Sindh, the initial Turks who invaded Afghanistan and much of Pakistan accepted Hinduism. Their cult of Shamanism was similar to Shiva Cult and they had no issues converting to Hinduism. They were the Hindu Shahis. Their rule ended when the ancestors of modern day Pakistanis(Hindus) over threw Hindu shahis and gained back the power.
 
Just a quick check. Bin Qasim only conquered Sindh in 712 AD. Arab reign was short lived. Arabs were expanding more towards North Africa and Spain/Portugal after that. Hindu Rajas quickly took over until Turks under the leadership of Ghaznavi defeated Hindu Rajas of modern day Pakistan and occupied the entire modern day Pakistan and a big part of North India in 12th century. In the process converted boat loads of people.
After Arabs left Sindh, the initial Turks who invaded Afghanistan and much of Pakistan accepted Hinduism. Their cult of Shamanism was similar to Shiva Cult and they had no issues converting to Hinduism. They were the Hindu Shahis. Their rule ended when the ancestors of modern day Pakistanis(Hindus) over threw Hindu shahis and gained back the power.
Dear @The Bald Eagle @Suleiman @ElRaja @KingKhanWC @Boyka @emranabbas @Justcrazy @sweep_shot @BouncerGuy

Please take note and be witness for me on the day of Judgement that I am proud of my ancestors losing in battlefield to Muslims & then my ancestors voluntarily accepting Islam!

My ancestors neither fought Turks nor got defeated by them and I do not have any Turkic ancestry in me but it wouldn't matter if any of it was true.​
  1. Proud of being defeated by "Muslims" in battle​
  2. Proud of having accepted Islam.​
There is no such thing as "forced conversion" in Islam, my ancestors lost in battle and then voluntarily accepted Islam and then migrated to India along with Afghan Army. Nobody converted anybody! Yes it is true that defeated people often adopt the ideology and dogma of victorious ones but then Tatars were victorious and still adopted Islam (the religion of the subjugated ones) so the power is in Islam.

Its the same power of Islam which I regularly see day in and day out making people convert to Islam even today when Muslims have no power or control in the west.

No harm in admitting when you gave it your best in the battlefield and then lost to a superior enemy.

No issues with any of my history or anybody else (who were Hindus or Shamans) or whatever and then converted to Islam either due to defeat in battlefield (by Arabs or Afghans) or Dawah (South India) or whatever. Centuries later, we are neither ashamed of our conversion nor have any interest in returning to whatever we were worshiping instead of ONE GOD.

My Turkic brothers are tough in battle and proud to serve alongside them against enemies of Islam in the "near future" which will happen.
 
Dear @The Bald Eagle @Suleiman @ElRaja @KingKhanWC @Boyka @emranabbas @Justcrazy @sweep_shot @BouncerGuy

Please take note and be witness for me on the day of Judgement that I am proud of my ancestors losing in battlefield to Muslims & then my ancestors voluntarily accepting Islam!

My ancestors neither fought Turks nor got defeated by them and I do not have any Turkic ancestry in me but it wouldn't matter if any of it was true.​
  1. Proud of being defeated by "Muslims" in battle​
  2. Proud of having accepted Islam.​
There is no such thing as "forced conversion" in Islam, my ancestors lost in battle and then voluntarily accepted Islam and then migrated to India along with Afghan Army. Nobody converted anybody! Yes it is true that defeated people often adopt the ideology and dogma of victorious ones but then Tatars were victorious and still adopted Islam (the religion of the subjugated ones) so the power is in Islam.

Its the same power of Islam which I regularly see day in and day out making people convert to Islam even today when Muslims have no power or control in the west.

No harm in admitting when you gave it your best in the battlefield and then lost to a superior enemy.

No issues with any of my history or anybody else (who were Hindus or Shamans) or whatever and then converted to Islam either due to defeat in battlefield (by Arabs or Afghans) or Dawah (South India) or whatever. Centuries later, we are neither ashamed of our conversion nor have any interest in returning to whatever we were worshiping instead of ONE GOD.

My Turkic brothers are tough in battle and proud to serve alongside them against enemies of Islam in the "near future" which will happen.
Your Turkic brothers were not mentioned in good context in Islamic scriptures.


It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said:
"The Hour will not begin until the Muslims fight the Turks, a people with faces like hammered shields who wear clothes made of hair and shoes made of hair."



So in the end all Muslims will be fighting Turks anyways.

By the way, nice coping mechanism for the losses to Turks.
 
Dear @The Bald Eagle @Suleiman @ElRaja @KingKhanWC @Boyka @emranabbas @Justcrazy @sweep_shot @BouncerGuy

Please take note and be witness for me on the day of Judgement that I am proud of my ancestors losing in battlefield to Muslims & then my ancestors voluntarily accepting Islam!

My ancestors neither fought Turks nor got defeated by them and I do not have any Turkic ancestry in me but it wouldn't matter if any of it was true.​
  1. Proud of being defeated by "Muslims" in battle​
  2. Proud of having accepted Islam.​
There is no such thing as "forced conversion" in Islam, my ancestors lost in battle and then voluntarily accepted Islam and then migrated to India along with Afghan Army. Nobody converted anybody! Yes it is true that defeated people often adopt the ideology and dogma of victorious ones but then Tatars were victorious and still adopted Islam (the religion of the subjugated ones) so the power is in Islam.

Its the same power of Islam which I regularly see day in and day out making people convert to Islam even today when Muslims have no power or control in the west.

No harm in admitting when you gave it your best in the battlefield and then lost to a superior enemy.

No issues with any of my history or anybody else (who were Hindus or Shamans) or whatever and then converted to Islam either due to defeat in battlefield (by Arabs or Afghans) or Dawah (South India) or whatever. Centuries later, we are neither ashamed of our conversion nor have any interest in returning to whatever we were worshiping instead of ONE GOD.

My Turkic brothers are tough in battle and proud to serve alongside them against enemies of Islam in the "near future" which will happen.
Brother arguing with these individuals on this is futile…

There are many different versions of Hinduism, before Islam their empires fought amongst themselves and after conquest would destroy the temples of the new area they acquired and then introduce new “gods” or idols to the new region in the subcontinent different than what the natives were used to. So I guess those are converts too? Lol.

Literally every soldier of Islam to set foot in India or anywhere else in the world at any time was a revert / convert either by way of their parents, forefathers converting to Islam, or they themselves were non Muslims and then became Muslim.

Every single Arab tribe during the time of Prophet Muhammad PBUH was a revert / convert, at times AFTER losing the battle to the Muslims then.

And now those same Arabs are considered “original Muslims” by these kuffar…

The goal post shifting doesn’t end, nor does the class based labelling of convert / “born Muslim”… but what else do you expect from people who for thousands of years followed a faith based on classism / caste.

You cannot change religion by force. Otherwise there were many munafiq during the time of the Prophet PBUH who pretended to be Muslim but weren’t. Documented.

The Indians of the subcontinent could’ve done the same, no? Say yes we are Muslim and then go back to worshipping whatever If worshipping idols was really the truth? (Nauzu Billah)

But it isn’t.

They saw in Islam what is in our innate nature to worship 1 God, Islam made far more sense to them than whatever falsehood they were on, and they let go of pride and ego of “I’m leaving my people’s religion” to embrace the religion of truth
 
Brother arguing with these individuals on this is futile…

There are many different versions of Hinduism, before Islam their empires fought amongst themselves and after conquest would destroy the temples of the new area they acquired and then introduce new “gods” or idols to the new region in the subcontinent different than what the natives were used to. So I guess those are converts too? Lol.

Literally every soldier of Islam to set foot in India or anywhere else in the world at any time was a revert / convert either by way of their parents, forefathers converting to Islam, or they themselves were non Muslims and then became Muslim.

Every single Arab tribe during the time of Prophet Muhammad PBUH was a revert / convert, at times AFTER losing the battle to the Muslims then.

And now those same Arabs are considered “original Muslims” by these kuffar…

The goal post shifting doesn’t end, nor does the class based labelling of convert / “born Muslim”… but what else do you expect from people who for thousands of years followed a faith based on classism / caste.

You cannot change religion by force. Otherwise there were many munafiq during the time of the Prophet PBUH who pretended to be Muslim but weren’t. Documented.

The Indians of the subcontinent could’ve done the same, no? Say yes we are Muslim and then go back to worshipping whatever If worshipping idols was really the truth? (Nauzu Billah)

But it isn’t.

They saw in Islam what is in our innate nature to worship 1 God, Islam made far more sense to them than whatever falsehood they were on, and they let go of pride and ego of “I’m leaving my people’s religion” to embrace the religion of truth

Hindutva English Comprehensions Skills:

I said:

My ancestors neither fought Turks nor got defeated by them and I do not have any Turkic ancestry in me but it wouldn't matter if any of it was true.


Chump replies:

Your Turkic brothers were not mentioned in good context in Islamic scriptures.


It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said:
"The Hour will not begin until the Muslims fight the Turks, a people with faces like hammered shields who wear clothes made of hair and shoes made of hair."



So in the end all Muslims will be fighting Turks anyways.

By the way, nice coping mechanism for the losses to Turks.
 
Hindutva English Comprehensions Skills:

I said:

My ancestors neither fought Turks nor got defeated by them and I do not have any Turkic ancestry in me but it wouldn't matter if any of it was true.


Chump replies:
Looks like I touched a nerve as you resorted to name calling.

Anyways. Your ancestors did not fight the Ghaznavi Sabuktagin? 😂 You mean to say they just laid down the arms and joined them right away? 🤣

Your ancestors fought along side the Hindu Raja who was defeated by the invading Turks. Read up a bit. It’s not hard.

So what do you think of the Hadith I posted? Turks are enemies of Islam after all.
 
@HalBass9 , no response but a laughing emoji. Ran out of ideas🤡
Looks like I’m living rent-free in your head, must be getting crowded in there.

No, there’s really nothing to say to someone who clearly has no grasp of what they’re talking about, especially when they’ve spent their time defending genocide, ethnic cleansing, and occupation. The only thing left is to call it what it is, just like the rest of the world already has.
 
Looks like I’m living rent-free in your head, must be getting crowded in there.

No, there’s really nothing to say to someone who clearly has no grasp of what they’re talking about, especially when they’ve spent their time defending genocide, ethnic cleansing, and occupation. The only thing left is to call it what it is, just like the rest of the world already has.
What has genocide and ethnic cleansing got to do with Muslims fighting evil Turks at end times?

Mine hard on you to align your selves with the people that your future generations will be fighting at end times.😗
 
What has genocide and ethnic cleansing got to do with Muslims fighting evil Turks at end times?

Mine hard on you to align your selves with the people that your future generations will be fighting at end times.😗
Your posts are not even worth responding to.

Perhaps to tell you that Islam is superior to any religion and in it’s purest form, means complete submission to monotheism. A simple concept, but difficult to grasp.

We don’t care if we are converts or not, we are happy with the truth.

What’s your issue? We don’t want to be Hindu bro, go away.
 
Your posts are not even worth responding to.

Perhaps to tell you that Islam is superior to any religion and in it’s purest form, means complete submission to monotheism. A simple concept, but difficult to grasp.

We don’t care if we are converts or not, we are happy with the truth.

What’s your issue? We don’t want to be Hindu bro, go away.

Why do these sanghis call us converts? I don't understand. Our ancestors converted. Not us. We have been Muslims from Day 1.

Even if we were converts, is that supposed to be an insult? LOL. I would rather convert to truth than staying with falsehood. I am delighted my ancestor converted to Islam.

Even Arabs themselves converted. They were followers of other religions before Islam.
These sanghis are truly low-IQ and stupid. No point in debating with them. :inti
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your posts are not even worth responding to.

Perhaps to tell you that Islam is superior to any religion and in it’s purest form, means complete submission to monotheism. A simple concept, but difficult to grasp.

We don’t care if we are converts or not, we are happy with the truth.

What’s your issue? We don’t want to be Hindu bro, go away.
No one wants to revert you. You can breathe easy. I corrected some claims by certain poster.

I did not want you to respond to my posts anyway. You took the effort to respond. Thanks for that.😉
 
Happy to be Muslim, convert or born and it doesn't really matter.

Exactly.

What matters is we live as Muslims and die as Muslims.

These sanghis think we owe them explanations. LOL.

It makes me laugh they think calling us "converts" is some sort of insult. It really isn't. We are not converts anyway; we are born Muslims.
 
Back
Top