Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,026
Babar is a fantastic batsmen. He is carrying the Pakistan team the way Quinton de Kock does it for South Africa.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course, you can pretend to not understand and ignore the most basic concepts and information that clearly contradicts your point, but that won't change the reality that Babar is clearly capable of scoring 30+ at 200+, given that already has shown and done that. You can change the criteria to innings/number of 6s/length of the boundary but that fact remains that is capable.
It wouldn't have matter if his SR had dropped from 200+ to 120 after he crossed 30 runs, the fact would still remain that he scored 30 runs at a SR of 200+, hence showing that he is capable.
Of course, you can pretend to not understand and ignore the most basic concepts and information that clearly contradicts your point, but that won't change the reality that Babar is clearly capable of scoring 30+ at 200+, given that already has shown and done that. You can change the criteria to innings/number of 6s/length of the boundary but that fact remains that is capable.
It wouldn't have matter if his SR had dropped from 200+ to 120 after he crossed 30 runs, the fact would still remain that he scored 30 runs at a SR of 200+, hence showing that he is capable.
Babar also scored 43 off 19 against SA. So he is definitely capable
What Hyperion wants is for Babar to score 43 off 19 and get out the next ball so he has a score of 30+ with a strike rate of 200+![]()
Mate I am not pretending, you are the one desperately trying to prove part of an innings to be an innings. Babar hasn't played a single 30+ innings at 200+, am I wrong? No. Which is quite embarrassing for a so called top t20 bat. The day Babar achieve this massive feat, which I highly doubt he will, I will accept that I was wrong.
You're not wrong, but you're putting an arbitrary qualifier. When Kohli had played his first 38 innings in this format, he hadn't played an innings at 200 SR either and his overall SR was 131 but he was still ranked as the #1 T20I batsman.
Babar is slowly starting the conversation to make it the fab five...
Rahul is fighting for his place in the side and not be a failed talent
You're not wrong, but you're putting an arbitrary qualifier. When Kohli had played his first 38 innings in this format, he hadn't played an innings at 200 SR either and his overall SR was 131 but he was still ranked as the #1 T20I batsman.
You too man!! Like seriously? Kohli was player of the series in 2014 t20 WC, won match in England, won a series in Australia before his 38th match, has Babar done anything even close to these? At least dekho who you are comparing Babar with!! [MENTION=142782]Darkrai[/MENTION]
Pretty much everyone has already accepted Rahul has a better power game, but you're the only one suggesting it's 'embarrassing' for a top-ranked batsman to not have a 200-SR innings. Well, he isn't the first and won't be the last...
I wasn't comparing with Kohli. Just pointing out that your arbitrary statistical qualifier isn't really a useful measure to judge anything.
Pretty much everyone has already accepted Rahul has a better power game, but you're the only one suggesting it's 'embarrassing' for a top-ranked batsman to not have a 200-SR innings. Well, he isn't the first and won't be the last...
What is hyperion trying to deny?
Babar is a top 10 batsman in ODIs.
Babar is a top 10 batsman in tests.
Babar is a top 10 batsman in T20s.
KL is better than Babar in T20s, and is a top 5 batsman in this one format.
Warner and Kohli are the top 2 batters in T20s.
Babar azam is ranked 3 in odis and 1 in t20 So more like he is in top 5 in 2 format only format where he is he is lagging is test where he is ranked 7 which is also very close to top 5
These kind of posts is why there are posts to the other extreme underrating Babar.
Babar is not the best batsman in T20s. In what world is he better than Warner or Kohli? Even the likes of Maxwell, Morgan, Finch, KL are clearly better than him in T20s.
Babar is in the next group which is still an achievement (still top 10)
These are stats for the last 2 years for T20Is for matches amongst the top 8 teams (minimum 10 innings)
View attachment 98586
What is hyperion trying to deny?
Babar is a top 10 batsman in ODIs.
Babar is a top 10 batsman in tests.
Babar is a top 10 batsman in T20s.
KL is better than Babar in T20s, and is a top 5 batsman in this one format.
Warner and Kohli are the top 2 batters in T20s.
You too man!! Like seriously? Kohli was player of the series in 2014 t20 WC, won match in England, won a series in Australia before his 38th match, has Babar done anything even close to these? At least dekho who you are comparing Babar with!! [MENTION=142782]Darkrai[/MENTION]
Epic series for Kohli against Boland, Tye, Faulkner!
Babar's 2 fifties in the recent series in Australia were better than Kohli's innings. It was against a real attack with Starc and Cummins, not against club level bowling attack.
Babar can't even play 30+ innings at 200 against a club level attack , he faced his fair share of Silapana and Junior dalas. This is how ordinary he is in this format, a stat padder through and through and zero impact outside his slow low paradise.
Babar can't even play 30+ innings at 200 against a club level attack , he faced his fair share of Silapana and Junior dalas. This is how ordinary he is in this format, a stat padder through and through and zero impact outside his slow low paradise.
If Rahul continues to flourish, he’s going to be an incredible player for India. Very good comparison indeed. Love to see how they stand by end of this year. My gut says Babar will score loads of runs while Rahul will make impactful runs as his team already has players who can play like Babar.
Hyperion over here wants Babar to score 30 off 14 and get out on the next ball just so Hyperion’s criteria can be met![]()
The 2 fifties mentioned were in Australia and against Starc, Cummins.
If you think it's nothing go and check Kohli's ODI record in Australia when Starc, Hazlewood and/or Cummins play.
The 2 fifties mentioned were in Australia and against Starc, Cummins.
If you think it's nothing go and check Kohli's ODI record in Australia when Starc, Hazlewood and/or Cummins play.
Come back when Babar wins you matches against Starc and Cummins. Bara aaya Starc Cummins dikhane lol ��
You don't often win when your team is not good enough. But you Can still be the best. Just like Tendulkar and Lara played a big part of there careers in teams that often lost but were still part of the best.
These kind of posts is why there are posts to the other extreme underrating Babar.
Babar is not the best batsman in T20s. In what world is he better than Warner or Kohli? Even the likes of Maxwell, Morgan, Finch, KL are clearly better than him in T20s.
Babar is in the next group which is still an achievement (still top 10)
These are stats for the last 2 years for T20Is for matches amongst the top 8 teams (minimum 10 innings)
View attachment 98586
So you mean to say that Babar would only score unimpactful but loads of runs ?![]()
T20Is
Babar : 38 Inns, 1471 runs, 128 SR
Rahul : 38 Inns, 1461 runs, 146 SR
T20Is
Babar : 38 Inns, 1471 runs, 128 SR
Rahul : 38 Inns, 1461 runs, 146 SR
Tests
Babar - 47 inns, 1707 runs, hundred away from home -1
KL Rahul -
After 47 inns, 1811 runs, hundred away from home - 4
KL is going to consistently play a LOT more impactful innings than Babar in LOIs.
These numbers, do need some context though. For example, what was the average SR of the batsmen who played in the matches played by Babar vs that of Rahul. Only then we will get a conclusive proof.
However, looking at both of them bat, I do believe that Rahul is the better T20I batsman.
ODIs:
Babar - 72 inns, 3359 runs, 11 hundreds and 15 fifties, an average of 54.17 at a strike rate of 87.08
KLegund Rahul - 28 inns, 1035 runs, 3 hundreds and 6 fifties, an average of 43.12 at a strike rate of 83.60
I am most worried about tests.
He needs to go back to the basics.
He can be good in the middle order.Maybe replace Rahane in future
Certainly deserves a comeback chance
Tests
Babar - 47 inns, 1707 runs, hundred away from home -1
KL Rahul -
After 47 inns, 1811 runs, hundred away from home - 4
First he needs to prove in first class cricket.
I am most worried about tests.
He needs to go back to the basics.
These numbers, do need some context though. For example, what was the average SR of the batsmen who played in the matches played by Babar vs that of Rahul. Only then we will get a conclusive proof.
However, looking at both of them bat, I do believe that Rahul is the better T20I batsman.
Imagine the level of delusion!! According to many PP posters Babar is already one of the best in the world despite having mostly similar stats in two of the 3 formats with Rahul who is not even considered a top 5 all format bat in India.
KL is serious quality so he was bound to eventually come good.
KL has barely hit his stride and his odi average is 42 already.
3 100s in 29 ODIs.
In t20, he should aim for 50 @ 150.
Those were his numbers before he lost his way.
Imagine the level of delusion!! According to many PP posters Babar is already one of the best in the world despite having mostly similar stats in two of the 3 formats with Rahul who is not even considered a top 5 all format bat in India.
Has a decent FC record. Plus already has tons in WI,Aus,Eng.So ability not in doubt.Only form was an issue
In current form ,he deserves a look in.If he fails,we can always move on
KL is serious quality so he was bound to eventually come good.
KL has barely hit his stride and his odi average is 42 already.
3 100s in 29 ODIs.
In t20, he should aim for 50 @ 150.
Those were his numbers before he lost his way.
Imam 7 hundreds in 37 odis so he is better the kl rahul right?
Period
At home-yes.
At SENA-No way Iam going to pick this guy hell even Iam not going to pick Rohit Sharma.
How do you see his 3 hundreds in SENA then.Those were while opening,even tougher
His problem was he was too cautious.If hes told to play his natural game,I'm sure he can prosper.Too much talent to just write off atm
Rohit has never scored a overseas ton,so both are incomparable
L. Rahul. I think he's got tremendous style. And he is, maybe, the prettiest batsman to watch in the world at the moment. The way he plays and his technique is unbelievable. And I just love
watching him play cricket.”
These words coming from Brian Lara should be music to Rahul’s ears.
The 50-year-old revealed his choice when answering questions from budding golfers at the Delhi Golf Club on Sunday.
“Virat Kohli, of course, is a machine and he scores a lot of runs. And he's, may be, the greatest batsman in the world and maybe, one of the greatest batsman that ever lived. But when it comes to style, I just love lying in my bed and just watch K. L. Rahul bat all day!”
Lara on Rahul
https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cric...irat-kohli-jasprit-bumrah/article30313511.ece
As predicted earlier, Rahul is indeed turning into a very dynamic impact batsman. He really oozes class. He will only enrich the game if he comes good in test matches as well. Pure artistry. However, he is and will remain a couple of levels below Babar who is destined to become one of the greatest the game has seen and certainly Pakistan's greatest. The comparison is almost akin to Inzamam with Laxman.