What's new

Babar Azam versus Lokesh Rahul

Babar is a fantastic batsmen. He is carrying the Pakistan team the way Quinton de Kock does it for South Africa.
 
Of course, you can pretend to not understand and ignore the most basic concepts and information that clearly contradicts your point, but that won't change the reality that Babar is clearly capable of scoring 30+ at 200+, given that already has shown and done that. You can change the criteria to innings/number of 6s/length of the boundary but that fact remains that is capable.

It wouldn't have matter if his SR had dropped from 200+ to 120 after he crossed 30 runs, the fact would still remain that he scored 30 runs at a SR of 200+, hence showing that he is capable.

Babar also scored 43 off 19 against SA. So he is definitely capable

What Hyperion wants is for Babar to score 43 off 19 and get out the next ball so he has a score of 30+ with a strike rate of 200+ :facepalm:
 
Babar is slowly starting the conversation to make it the fab five...

Rahul is fighting for his place in the side and not be a failed talent
 
Of course, you can pretend to not understand and ignore the most basic concepts and information that clearly contradicts your point, but that won't change the reality that Babar is clearly capable of scoring 30+ at 200+, given that already has shown and done that. You can change the criteria to innings/number of 6s/length of the boundary but that fact remains that is capable.

It wouldn't have matter if his SR had dropped from 200+ to 120 after he crossed 30 runs, the fact would still remain that he scored 30 runs at a SR of 200+, hence showing that he is capable.

Mate I am not pretending, you are the one desperately trying to prove part of an innings to be an innings. Babar hasn't played a single 30+ innings at 200+, am I wrong? No. Which is quite embarrassing for a so called top t20 bat. The day Babar achieve this massive feat, which I highly doubt he will, I will accept that I was wrong.
 
Babar role is different to that of KL. Babar has to guide the team. If someone else does this role, then he can express himself more freely. Until then, they cannot be compared.
 
Babar also scored 43 off 19 against SA. So he is definitely capable

What Hyperion wants is for Babar to score 43 off 19 and get out the next ball so he has a score of 30+ with a strike rate of 200+ :facepalm:

Some people can be unreasonable.

Also, there is more pressure on Babar because if he doesn't perform or play long innings then Pakistan struggles. As we saw, when Babar failed Pakistan was whitewashed by SL and barely crossed a 100 in AUS. So he has to make sure he doesn't give away his wicket while still scoring at a high SR. This puts extra pressure on him, especially now that he is the captain and responsible for his team's performance.
 
Babar is number 1 in T20, 3 in ODIs, and 7 in test. These are facts based of actual performance. Those who claim that there are dozens of batsmen better than him in each format or across formats, those claims are nothing but opinions of some random people.
 
Mate I am not pretending, you are the one desperately trying to prove part of an innings to be an innings. Babar hasn't played a single 30+ innings at 200+, am I wrong? No. Which is quite embarrassing for a so called top t20 bat. The day Babar achieve this massive feat, which I highly doubt he will, I will accept that I was wrong.

You're not wrong, but you're putting an arbitrary qualifier. When Kohli had played his first 38 innings in this format, he hadn't played an innings at 200 SR either and his overall SR was 131 but he was still ranked as the #1 T20I batsman.
 
You're not wrong, but you're putting an arbitrary qualifier. When Kohli had played his first 38 innings in this format, he hadn't played an innings at 200 SR either and his overall SR was 131 but he was still ranked as the #1 T20I batsman.

I guess Kohli was an embarrassment back then.:yk
 
Babar is slowly starting the conversation to make it the fab five...

Rahul is fighting for his place in the side and not be a failed talent

There is no fab 4, just a big 2 and the rest.

I would take Babar over KW in both LOI formats, and he is catching up to Root.

Over all 3 formats, I would probably take Rohit and Warner over both Root and KW.
 
You're not wrong, but you're putting an arbitrary qualifier. When Kohli had played his first 38 innings in this format, he hadn't played an innings at 200 SR either and his overall SR was 131 but he was still ranked as the #1 T20I batsman.

You too man!! Like seriously? Kohli was player of the series in 2014 t20 WC, won match in England, won a series in Australia before his 38th match, has Babar done anything even close to these? At least dekho who you are comparing Babar with!! [MENTION=142782]Darkrai[/MENTION]
 
You too man!! Like seriously? Kohli was player of the series in 2014 t20 WC, won match in England, won a series in Australia before his 38th match, has Babar done anything even close to these? At least dekho who you are comparing Babar with!! [MENTION=142782]Darkrai[/MENTION]

I wasn't comparing with Kohli. Just pointing out that your arbitrary statistical qualifier isn't really a useful measure to judge anything.

Pretty much everyone has already accepted Rahul has a better power game, but you're the only one suggesting it's 'embarrassing' for a top-ranked batsman to not have a 200-SR innings. Well, he isn't the first and won't be the last...
 
Pretty much everyone has already accepted Rahul has a better power game, but you're the only one suggesting it's 'embarrassing' for a top-ranked batsman to not have a 200-SR innings. Well, he isn't the first and won't be the last...

Babar's lack of a power-game is not an issue for the Pak NT. That is also not his primary role.
 
I wasn't comparing with Kohli. Just pointing out that your arbitrary statistical qualifier isn't really a useful measure to judge anything.

Pretty much everyone has already accepted Rahul has a better power game, but you're the only one suggesting it's 'embarrassing' for a top-ranked batsman to not have a 200-SR innings. Well, he isn't the first and won't be the last...

Kohli was no power hitter back then but the impact he still had on the games, the sheer amount of matches he won just by playing by the books shots was freaksh to say the least. He deserved that ranking more than anyone. Babar hasn't done anything remotely close to what he achieved after playing same number of games plus he doesn't have a single 30+ innings at 180. So he can't score very fast, not exactly a match winner away from home, hasn't chased anything of note, can you blame me when I doubt his ranking?
 
What is hyperion trying to deny?

Babar is a top 10 batsman in ODIs.
Babar is a top 10 batsman in tests.
Babar is a top 10 batsman in T20s.

KL is better than Babar in T20s, and is a top 5 batsman in this one format.

Warner and Kohli are the top 2 batters in T20s.
 
What is hyperion trying to deny?

Babar is a top 10 batsman in ODIs.
Babar is a top 10 batsman in tests.
Babar is a top 10 batsman in T20s.

KL is better than Babar in T20s, and is a top 5 batsman in this one format.

Warner and Kohli are the top 2 batters in T20s.

Babar azam is ranked 3 in odis and 1 in t20 So more like he is in top 5 in 2 format only format where he is he is lagging is test where he is ranked 7 which is also very close to top 5
 
Babar azam is ranked 3 in odis and 1 in t20 So more like he is in top 5 in 2 format only format where he is he is lagging is test where he is ranked 7 which is also very close to top 5

These kind of posts is why there are posts to the other extreme underrating Babar.


Babar is not the best batsman in T20s. In what world is he better than Warner or Kohli? Even the likes of Maxwell, Morgan, Finch, KL are clearly better than him in T20s.

Babar is in the next group which is still an achievement (still top 10)

These are stats for the last 2 years for T20Is for matches amongst the top 8 teams (minimum 10 innings)
Screen Shot 2020-01-26 at 10.40.52 PM.jpg
 
Last edited:
Any one will take babar over KL Rahul when it comes to All Format player
So Babar >>>>>>>>>>>>>> KL Rahul
 
These kind of posts is why there are posts to the other extreme underrating Babar.


Babar is not the best batsman in T20s. In what world is he better than Warner or Kohli? Even the likes of Maxwell, Morgan, Finch, KL are clearly better than him in T20s.

Babar is in the next group which is still an achievement (still top 10)

These are stats for the last 2 years for T20Is for matches amongst the top 8 teams (minimum 10 innings)
View attachment 98586

I dont get it why indian 14 years old posters are comparing both in only one format its not only skewed , distracting, Biased
But believe me if there is still a slight debate that who is better t20 bat then i see it as win for babar
 
Some PP posters need to improve their reading comprehension.

Babar is obviously miles better than KL, all formats considered. It is not a competition at this point.

KL is better than Babar in T20s.

Babar is not the best batsman in the world in T20s either.

Best guys in T20 average over 40 and have a S/R above 140 (see Maxwell, Warner, Kohli, KL over the last 2 years).
 
What is hyperion trying to deny?

Babar is a top 10 batsman in ODIs.
Babar is a top 10 batsman in tests.
Babar is a top 10 batsman in T20s.

KL is better than Babar in T20s, and is a top 5 batsman in this one format.

Warner and Kohli are the top 2 batters in T20s.

Not denying any of that except I would take Roy, Rohit, Rahul and Finch over Warner as far as t20s are concerned.
 
You too man!! Like seriously? Kohli was player of the series in 2014 t20 WC, won match in England, won a series in Australia before his 38th match, has Babar done anything even close to these? At least dekho who you are comparing Babar with!! [MENTION=142782]Darkrai[/MENTION]

Epic series for Kohli against Boland, Tye, Faulkner!

Babar's 2 fifties in the recent series in Australia were better than Kohli's innings. It was against a real attack with Starc and Cummins, not against club level bowling attack.
 
The hypocrisy against Babar is just too big here by some indian posters.
"Babar can't be the best batsman because his SR is just 128".

And they will, without any problem call Rohit Sharma better than Finch, Munro for example. When these 2 guys SR 20 more than Rohit does and Finch also averages 7 more.

At least Babar has the average and the consistency that's sets him apart from the rest (apart Kohli). Rahul has a superb combo of average/SR, but Rohit has nothing that's sets him apart. He is bettered in everything.
 
Epic series for Kohli against Boland, Tye, Faulkner!

Babar's 2 fifties in the recent series in Australia were better than Kohli's innings. It was against a real attack with Starc and Cummins, not against club level bowling attack.

Babar can't even play 30+ innings at 200 against a club level attack , he faced his fair share of Silapana and Junior dalas. This is how ordinary he is in this format, a stat padder through and through and zero impact outside his slow low paradise.
 
Babar can't even play 30+ innings at 200 against a club level attack , he faced his fair share of Silapana and Junior dalas. This is how ordinary he is in this format, a stat padder through and through and zero impact outside his slow low paradise.

The 2 fifties mentioned were in Australia and against Starc, Cummins.

If you think it's nothing go and check Kohli's ODI record in Australia when Starc, Hazlewood and/or Cummins play.
 
Babar can't even play 30+ innings at 200 against a club level attack , he faced his fair share of Silapana and Junior dalas. This is how ordinary he is in this format, a stat padder through and through and zero impact outside his slow low paradise.

You don’t even know what you’re going on about yourself.

He can score 30 runs off 15 if that’s what you want
He scored 40 odd off 18 against SA albeit it was his first 18 balls of his innings

So What are you even trying to say?
 
Hyperion over here wants Babar to score 30 off 14 and get out on the next ball just so Hyperion’s criteria can be met :facepalm:
 
If Rahul continues to flourish, he’s going to be an incredible player for India. Very good comparison indeed. Love to see how they stand by end of this year. My gut says Babar will score loads of runs while Rahul will make impactful runs as his team already has players who can play like Babar.
 
If Rahul continues to flourish, he’s going to be an incredible player for India. Very good comparison indeed. Love to see how they stand by end of this year. My gut says Babar will score loads of runs while Rahul will make impactful runs as his team already has players who can play like Babar.

So you mean to say that Babar would only score unimpactful but loads of runs ? :genius
 
Just one poster keeping this thread alive. I think we should park this thread until the time Rahul threatens Babar's rankings in atleast one format. Babar is so far ahead that this thread is laughable.
 
Hyperion over here wants Babar to score 30 off 14 and get out on the next ball just so Hyperion’s criteria can be met :facepalm:

It is hard for some people to digest that we have a batter that can out bat most of their batsmen . And frankly the criteria he is using, Afridi has to be the ATG in T20 format. :afridi
 
The 2 fifties mentioned were in Australia and against Starc, Cummins.

If you think it's nothing go and check Kohli's ODI record in Australia when Starc, Hazlewood and/or Cummins play.

Lol keep manipulating stats to suit your agenda but the fact is Babar is like a homeless man's Hashim Amla, will continue playing zero impact innings outside his slow low paradise, he will never be a match winner like Kohli. Kohli was player of the series in two world cups something Babar can never achieve even in his dreams. One has to be completely brianwashed to even think that Babar is at all comparable to Kohli.
 
The 2 fifties mentioned were in Australia and against Starc, Cummins.

If you think it's nothing go and check Kohli's ODI record in Australia when Starc, Hazlewood and/or Cummins play.

Come back when Babar wins you matches against Starc and Cummins. Bara aaya Starc Cummins dikhane lol ��
 
Babar is a pretty good and effective player for his team. He is scoring runs consistently for last 3 years like any top International batsman against most opposition and in most conditions, his stats is a big testimony for the same.

Is he effective for his team and a major factor for his team's success? Damn yes
Is there better batsmen than Babar in T20 and ODI? Absolutely yes but just because they are good for their team does not make Babar any less impactful for his team.
Is KL Rahul talented and can be as good as Babar in LOI? Yes he can if he is ready to put his head down and continue to score loads of runs for his team under trying conditions for next couple of years atleast.

Not seeing why there is so much denial on either side.
 
Come back when Babar wins you matches against Starc and Cummins. Bara aaya Starc Cummins dikhane lol ��

You don't often win when your team is not good enough. But you Can still be the best. Just like Tendulkar and Lara played a big part of there careers in teams that often lost but were still part of the best.
 
You don't often win when your team is not good enough. But you Can still be the best. Just like Tendulkar and Lara played a big part of there careers in teams that often lost but were still part of the best.

Please don't mention Babar in the same breath as Lara and SRT. As cricket fans we shouldn't disrespect the legends like that. I wouldn't support you if you do the same with say Shaheen and Wasim.
 
These kind of posts is why there are posts to the other extreme underrating Babar.


Babar is not the best batsman in T20s. In what world is he better than Warner or Kohli? Even the likes of Maxwell, Morgan, Finch, KL are clearly better than him in T20s.

Babar is in the next group which is still an achievement (still top 10)

These are stats for the last 2 years for T20Is for matches amongst the top 8 teams (minimum 10 innings)
View attachment 98586

Obviously i didn't know bcci have their own ranking system which indian fans follow. just pointed out what is babar azam actual ranking according to official icc website.
 
LoL even Rahul or Babar would not be thinking other as competition and you guys are fighting over this. Either discuss with facts and figures or just be silent which is much better. Grown up kids ...
 
T20Is
Babar : 38 Inns, 1471 runs, 128 SR
Rahul : 38 Inns, 1461 runs, 146 SR

What’s the point of posting the same stats again and again?

Go celebrate that Rahul is currently playing better than Babar in a format that most people see as a joke.
 
Rahul has indeed picked up his game. Seems to also have an improved temperament. Even captained fairly well.

I wonder if this will have any positive impact on his ODI batting.
 
Tests

Babar - 47 inns, 1707 runs, hundred away from home -1
KL Rahul -
After 47 inns, 1811 runs, hundred away from home - 4
 
T20Is
Babar : 38 Inns, 1471 runs, 128 SR
Rahul : 38 Inns, 1461 runs, 146 SR


These numbers, do need some context though. For example, what was the average SR of the batsmen who played in the matches played by Babar vs that of Rahul. Only then we will get a conclusive proof.

However, looking at both of them bat, I do believe that Rahul is the better T20I batsman.
 
Tests

Babar - 47 inns, 1707 runs, hundred away from home -1
KL Rahul -
After 47 inns, 1811 runs, hundred away from home - 4

Look at where Babar is now and where Rahul is.

How the tables have turned

Kudos to Babar and shame on Rahul that he averages 20 in the last 2 years
 
Tests

Babar - 47 inns, 1707 runs, 4 hundreds and 13 fifties and an average of 42.67

Rahul - 60 inns, 2006 runs, 5 hundreds and 11 fifties and an average of 34.58
 
ODIs:

Babar - 72 inns, 3359 runs, 11 hundreds and 15 fifties, an average of 54.17 at a strike rate of 87.08

KLegund Rahul - 28 inns, 1035 runs, 3 hundreds and 6 fifties, an average of 43.12 at a strike rate of 83.60
 
KL is going to consistently play a LOT more impactful innings than Babar in LOIs.
 
Rahul has surpassed Babar in T20Is
Babar has far surpassed Rahul in Tests and it is unlikely Rahul will ever become the kind of lynchpin for India that Babar is for Pak

It will be interesting to see if Rahul can come close to Babar in ODIs given his new white ball evolution
 
These numbers, do need some context though. For example, what was the average SR of the batsmen who played in the matches played by Babar vs that of Rahul. Only then we will get a conclusive proof.

However, looking at both of them bat, I do believe that Rahul is the better T20I batsman.

By that argument every pak batsmen is better than indian batsmen as they all have low SR . KLs SR is significantly higher than Rohit , Dhawan, Iyer , pandey and even Virat anyway .
 
ODIs:

Babar - 72 inns, 3359 runs, 11 hundreds and 15 fifties, an average of 54.17 at a strike rate of 87.08

KLegund Rahul - 28 inns, 1035 runs, 3 hundreds and 6 fifties, an average of 43.12 at a strike rate of 83.60

That SR shot up from 80 to 83.6 cos of his last innings and should be in 90s if he continues his form in ODIs . These days any one who has a SR less than 95 plain average , both Babar and KL need to fix that soon .
 
KL is serious quality so he was bound to eventually come good.

KL has barely hit his stride and his odi average is 42 already.

3 100s in 29 ODIs.

In t20, he should aim for 50 @ 150.

Those were his numbers before he lost his way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tests

Babar - 47 inns, 1707 runs, hundred away from home -1
KL Rahul -
After 47 inns, 1811 runs, hundred away from home - 4

Imagine the level of delusion!! According to many PP posters Babar is already one of the best in the world despite having mostly similar stats in two of the 3 formats with Rahul who is not even considered a top 5 all format bat in India.
 
First he needs to prove in first class cricket.

Has a decent FC record. Plus already has tons in WI,Aus,Eng.So ability not in doubt.Only form was an issue

In current form ,he deserves a look in.If he fails,we can always move on
 
These numbers, do need some context though. For example, what was the average SR of the batsmen who played in the matches played by Babar vs that of Rahul. Only then we will get a conclusive proof.

However, looking at both of them bat, I do believe that Rahul is the better T20I batsman.

Babar

5duZlzw.png



Rahul

OZEo7GM.png
 
Imagine the level of delusion!! According to many PP posters Babar is already one of the best in the world despite having mostly similar stats in two of the 3 formats with Rahul who is not even considered a top 5 all format bat in India.

Similar?

Rahul averages in the 30s now in Tests and averages 20 in the last two years. What are you on about?
 
I said we will have a better idea of where these two stand in the ODI world cup. Well, Babar won that battle.

Now let's see how they perform in the T20 World Cup. This is Rahul's best format and he is in great form, so he'll have a much better chance to outperform Babar.
 
KL is serious quality so he was bound to eventually come good.

KL has barely hit his stride and his odi average is 42 already.

3 100s in 29 ODIs.

In t20, he should aim for 50 @ 150.

Those were his numbers before he lost his way.


Kl Rahuls three one day hundreds: one each against Zimbabwe, Sri Lanka and West Indies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Imagine the level of delusion!! According to many PP posters Babar is already one of the best in the world despite having mostly similar stats in two of the 3 formats with Rahul who is not even considered a top 5 all format bat in India.

Its not about only stats if u have closely followed careers of Williamson kohli and smith they all averaged 35-40 after 20 tests
Babar has Been standout player In every series, tournaments (including vitality blast where he ended up As the highest run scorer) he played in last 1.5 year or so he has different presence or aura on the crease when he bats now a days
Everyone knows him now hell even u19 cricketers wants to emulate babar cover drive
There is no comparison between the two at the moment one is World class player and other is talented but Nowhere near babar in odis and tests
 
Has a decent FC record. Plus already has tons in WI,Aus,Eng.So ability not in doubt.Only form was an issue

In current form ,he deserves a look in.If he fails,we can always move on

At home-yes.
At SENA-No way Iam going to pick this guy hell even Iam not going to pick Rohit Sharma.
 
KL is serious quality so he was bound to eventually come good.

KL has barely hit his stride and his odi average is 42 already.

3 100s in 29 ODIs.

In t20, he should aim for 50 @ 150.

Those were his numbers before he lost his way.

Imam 7 hundreds in 37 odis so he is better the kl rahul right?
Period
 
At home-yes.
At SENA-No way Iam going to pick this guy hell even Iam not going to pick Rohit Sharma.

How do you see his 3 hundreds in SENA then.Those were while opening,even tougher

His problem was he was too cautious.If hes told to play his natural game,I'm sure he can prosper.Too much talent to just write off atm

Rohit has never scored a overseas ton,so both are incomparable
 
How do you see his 3 hundreds in SENA then.Those were while opening,even tougher

His problem was he was too cautious.If hes told to play his natural game,I'm sure he can prosper.Too much talent to just write off atm

Rohit has never scored a overseas ton,so both are incomparable

Only 1,2nd was in WestIndies,3rd one was in England after he failed to succeed in that series.
There is a gambling in picking up him in test, it's due to his failures in last 1.5 years.
In white ball he was never out of form.
 
L. Rahul. I think he's got tremendous style. And he is, maybe, the prettiest batsman to watch in the world at the moment. The way he plays and his technique is unbelievable. And I just love
watching him play cricket.”

These words coming from Brian Lara should be music to Rahul’s ears.

The 50-year-old revealed his choice when answering questions from budding golfers at the Delhi Golf Club on Sunday.

“Virat Kohli, of course, is a machine and he scores a lot of runs. And he's, may be, the greatest batsman in the world and maybe, one of the greatest batsman that ever lived. But when it comes to style, I just love lying in my bed and just watch K. L. Rahul bat all day!”

Lara on Rahul

https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cric...irat-kohli-jasprit-bumrah/article30313511.ece
 
KL Rahul has done well in T20s. However, he can’t be compared with Babar unless he starts performing well in all three formats of the game.
 
Ask bowlers.. who would they prefer to bowl? Rahul or Babar?
And ask any expert who will more impact full scores in White ball cricket ( including ODI).
 
L. Rahul. I think he's got tremendous style. And he is, maybe, the prettiest batsman to watch in the world at the moment. The way he plays and his technique is unbelievable. And I just love
watching him play cricket.”

These words coming from Brian Lara should be music to Rahul’s ears.

The 50-year-old revealed his choice when answering questions from budding golfers at the Delhi Golf Club on Sunday.

“Virat Kohli, of course, is a machine and he scores a lot of runs. And he's, may be, the greatest batsman in the world and maybe, one of the greatest batsman that ever lived. But when it comes to style, I just love lying in my bed and just watch K. L. Rahul bat all day!”

Lara on Rahul

https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cric...irat-kohli-jasprit-bumrah/article30313511.ece

Who wouldn't like watching Rahul bat when he is in full flow
 
As predicted earlier, Rahul is indeed turning into a very dynamic impact batsman. He really oozes class. He will only enrich the game if he comes good in test matches as well. Pure artistry. However, he is and will remain a couple of levels below Babar who is destined to become one of the greatest the game has seen and certainly Pakistan's greatest. The comparison is almost akin to Inzamam with Laxman.
 
As predicted earlier, Rahul is indeed turning into a very dynamic impact batsman. He really oozes class. He will only enrich the game if he comes good in test matches as well. Pure artistry. However, he is and will remain a couple of levels below Babar who is destined to become one of the greatest the game has seen and certainly Pakistan's greatest. The comparison is almost akin to Inzamam with Laxman.

Roles are different. In one dayers he is like 4th most important batsman in Indian line up. With Dhoni he was like 5th most important batsman. You have no option to construct the innings the way you want. Just look at Smith. Plus batting all over the line up doesn't help. He definitely has the "Root" issue of converting the starts at all levels. If he can iron that out he can take his game to the next level.
 
If 2 things that were missing from rahul's career so far are to be recalled - consistency & valuing his position.

In the recently concluded series, he got both of those covered.

To top it off, he had an extra/unforeseen bonus of captaining the team.
He must have observed the body language of the team members of his team while communicating to him as captain and as a team-mate - however small it is, hierarchy makes a difference to individuals.
Hope that will have established newer motivational goals in his mind to perform well.

His brain-fades still exist but the ceiling has gone to 40-50 level from the earlier 10-15 level.
 
Back
Top