What's new

Bangladesh vs Pakistan | 1st ODI | Dhaka | 1/12/11 | Pakistan Innings

  • Thread starter Thread starter AZ
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Good shot Hope sarfraz takes us home
so he is selected in next matches
 
safraz caught out, pakistan 4 wickets down

WE ARE CHASING 91 FFS FFS FFS!!!

This is Bangladesh!

Just send in Afridi and it will be over in 3 overs!
 
Could well be the end of Sarfraz and the return of Akmal.

Shocking batting yet again.
 
what is it with the camere-man focussing on the girls and women more than the match it self.

yeh match is boring but still...
 
lol where the ball was where he did hit ! sarfraz is even worst then Ajmal ..
 
wat a pathetic batting display sarfaraz i had so much hope 4 this kid, now im 1st to admit selectors knew how he was and were absolute right not picking him
 
umar akmal should have stayed as wicket keeper then shafiq could have played aswell.
 
Pak only play with 3 frontline batsman as Farhat Malik and hafeez are not good enough
 
Pakistan making a pigs ear out of this. Pretty much two main batsmen left and then afridi and otherwise we are left wth the tail!
 
Need to find another keeper for the odis. Sarfraz isnt good enough!
 
Don't worry guys, we'll get there around the 49th over with Captain sahib there.
 
48 still need to win.

Our batting really needs to improve!
 
Well, looks like it's time for the match fixing theories to come out of their graves:13:
 
Why are they taking the dinner interval?

Just wait until the end of innings, it isnt a Test match!
 
had the total been 150, this match would have been evenly balanced.

We cnt chase for crap!!

England are going to eat us alive coz they will be posting atleast a minimum of 260
 
That was a terrible shot by Sarfraz, but atleast give him a few chances before you ask for his head. He has the most potential out of all our wk prospects.
 
Misbah in his favourite sitation where he can 'tuk tuk' without being criticized :D he would have done tuk tuk anyway :))
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top