What's new

Bangladesh will have to handover land to India from Khulna to Sylhet: Subramanian Swamy

Lonewarrior

First Class Star
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Runs
3,417
Bangladesh will have to handover land from Khulna to Sylhet drawing a parallel line said Subramanian Swami.

The news has been published by Daily “Samoyik Prosongo” of Assam and the remark was made last Friday by Swami during a local campaign at Guwahati.

He said India was created based on religion. So one third of the Muslim from Bangladesh that entered India illegally, Dhaka will have to take them back or will have to give up one third of the land of Bangladesh to India.

Subramanian Swami further said he has not discussed the issue with Modi or other leaders yet but will raise a bill at the parliament at the correct time.

bdmorning1566215120ghd.jpg


https://www.bdmorning.com/bn/article/2019/393002

the new hitler nazis regime are asking for half of Bangladesh ..... :inti
[MENTION=141306]sweep_shot[/MENTION]
 
Despite outnumbering at 7-1, they won't try anything. They only have experience of suppressing civilians.
 
This is a reverse scenario. The BDs want to be in India and are occupying India. India has enough people as it is.
 
This is a reverse scenario. The BDs want to be in India and are occupying India. India has enough people as it is.

???

Do you know about Bengal which was present before the fabrication of india?
 
These guys are only pretend Hindutvas. Any genuine sanghi worth his salt would demand they hand over all of it.

Pathetic.
 
Shiekh Hasina be like when you want it?


BD's economy is growing rapidly, they need to get out of India's shadow now.
 
yes yes. please take bangladesh, and start ghar wapsi from there. as all bangladeshis are essentially hindu converts to islam, go take bangladesh, and withdraw from kashmir peacefully.
 
yes yes. please take bangladesh, and start ghar wapsi from there. as all bangladeshis are essentially hindu converts to islam, go take bangladesh, and withdraw from kashmir peacefully.

If you are a Muslim, I don't know how can you say it.

Ancestors of Pakistanis were Hindus too. Entire subcontinent was Hindu before.

I am glad my ancestors converted to Islam.
 
Last edited:
Shiekh Hasina be like when you want it?


BD's economy is growing rapidly, they need to get out of India's shadow now.

I fully agree with you.

Hasina behaves like Indian asset. A lot of Bangladeshis (including myself) are not happy with her.
 
I fully agree with you.

Hasina behaves like Indian asset. A lot of Bangladeshis (including myself) are not happy with her.

Unfortunately, there is no other alternative. Bangladesh needs another party. It is currently a one party system. Any good leaders in sight at the moment?
 
Unfortunately, there is no other alternative. Bangladesh needs another party. It is currently a one party system. Any good leaders in sight at the moment?

Hasina and her party destroys all other parties. They don't allow anyone else to come. It is unofficial dictatorship currently.

Only way this can be undone is if military does a coup. No other solution currently.
 
???

Do you know about Bengal which was present before the fabrication of india?

Muslim bengalis wanted a separate land and got it.

Thing is that now they are illegally migrating to India and are not welcomed here. They must stay in their own country.
 
Muslim bengalis wanted a separate land and got it.

Thing is that now they are illegally migrating to India and are not welcomed here. They must stay in their own country.

I actually have no issue if India sends those illegals back to Bangladesh.

I am always against illegal immigration.
 
Muslim bengalis wanted a separate land and got it.

Thing is that now they are illegally migrating to India and are not welcomed here. They must stay in their own country.

so you are saying INdai should take over bangladesh?

My god :facepalm:
 
Illegal BDeshis have to go back to their country. They are not welcome here. With the NRC in Assam, things are in motion to strip illegal immigrants of their falsely acquired citizenship. Once these people realize that India is a hostile place, they will leave and others will stop coming.
 
Illegal BDeshis have to go back to their country. They are not welcome here. With the NRC in Assam, things are in motion to strip illegal immigrants of their falsely acquired citizenship. Once these people realize that India is a hostile place, they will leave and others will stop coming.

Wasn't it just the Muslims who had to go back?
 
Wonder if the Bangladeshi govt will grow a spine and say something cause they've already supported India's genocide in Kashmir.
 
Very concerning indeed. India is turning into Nazi Germany.

I don't think it will happen but this type of rhetoric is alarming.
India will never be competent enough to even tie Nazi Germany's shoelaces.

Chai-wala will get his butt whooped, if he even thinks of replicating the barbaric and revolting thought-process of Hitler. Quite disrespectful to compare this literal nobody to one of the biggest villains history has ever seen.
 
Muslim bengalis wanted a separate land and got it.

Thing is that now they are illegally migrating to India and are not welcomed here. They must stay in their own country.

you reap what you sow, :))) india were happy to help liberate them, Bangladesh has a population the size of pakistan yet the country is 5 times smaller, of course when you outgrow your land you need more space.

What do you expect them to do?
 
Muslim bengalis wanted a separate land and got it.

Thing is that now they are illegally migrating to India and are not welcomed here. They must stay in their own country.

All bengalis (hindus or muslims) should have access to all of bengal (India or Bangladesh). It is their homeland and they should not be stopped from loving it.
 
west bengal has a population of 90m and Bangladesh has population of 180m. Lets have a referendum. :)))

bloody hell, kashmir, khalistan and bangladesh.

These RSS ******** wont like that.
 
All bengalis (hindus or muslims) should have access to all of bengal (India or Bangladesh). It is their homeland and they should not be stopped from loving it.

Thats not how it works. They are a separate country. Hindus and muslim bengalis decided that they will have a separate country. Now since the hindu majority part is doing well, the ones from muslim majority part cannot come here.
 
west bengal has a population of 90m and Bangladesh has population of 180m. Lets have a referendum. :)))

bloody hell, kashmir, khalistan and bangladesh.

These RSS ******** wont like that.

Referendum? Lol. What referendum.


Is this the new word in the dictionary of pakistanis like you?
 
you reap what you sow, :))) india were happy to help liberate them, Bangladesh has a population the size of pakistan yet the country is 5 times smaller, of course when you outgrow your land you need more space.

What do you expect them to do?

If we had not intervened, the entire population was looking to shift to India.
 
If we had not intervened, the entire population was looking to shift to India.

im sorry to say, look at america it has large mexicans population, USA cant stop them coming in, same will happen in india.

You cant stop the bengali muslims entering your country, they will find a way.

I will give you an analogy, indians alway give analogies, can 30 people live in a 2 bedroom flat? Bangladesh is overpopulated thank god they are nowhere near pakistan..
 
If you are a Muslim, I don't know how can you say it.

Ancestors of Pakistanis were Hindus too. Entire subcontinent was Hindu before.

I am glad my ancestors converted to Islam.

it is the truth that some of our ancestors were hindu. but the fact remains, that i dont give a crap what our ancestors worshipped.

its just that only when india subject bangladesh to what they are doing in kashmir, will make the bangla boys realize their folly in 1971.
 
im sorry to say, look at america it has large mexicans population, USA cant stop them coming in, same will happen in india.

You cant stop the bengali muslims entering your country, they will find a way.

I will give you an analogy, indians alway give analogies, can 30 people live in a 2 bedroom flat? Bangladesh is overpopulated thank god they are nowhere near pakistan..

You have to read about NRC then. First read, and then draw conclusions. See if it changes.
 
im sorry to say, look at america it has large mexicans population, USA cant stop them coming in, same will happen in india.

You cant stop the bengali muslims entering your country, they will find a way.

I will give you an analogy, indians alway give analogies, can 30 people live in a 2 bedroom flat? Bangladesh is overpopulated thank god they are nowhere near pakistan..

Common Indian is becoming increasingly hostile towards Bangladeshis. Assamese started the trend and its spreading. Now the law requires that illegal immigrants be stripped of citizenship. US doesnot have that.

In US once you are born on US soil you can claim citizenship, In India citizenship is by descent.

US has more land and 1/3rd of Indian population.

There will be violent clashes like the ones in assam againist Bdeshis.

The border is being fenced and in future shootings will start.
 
Thats not how it works. They are a separate country. Hindus and muslim bengalis decided that they will have a separate country. Now since the hindu majority part is doing well, the ones from muslim majority part cannot come here.

this is your narrative which may be wrong.

In Canada there is a province Quebec where there is a strong sentiment that they have more in common with France (same language & culture) than rest of Canada. Problem is they have no borders with France, heck France is on a different continent. So instead there was a thinking there to separate from Canada and become a new country. So they went to a referendum on freedom from Canada and majority decided to stay with Canada. They can always go to a referendum again on freedom from Canada and choose to become a new country and Canada will not mind.

As you know in 1947, 2 countries (India & Pakistan) were created and both of them had multiple ethnicities with no single ethnicity having more people than all the other ethinicities combined. At that time bengalis did not have their own country so they were divided in India and Pakistan.

But in 1971 a new country specifically for bengalis was created; its name Bangladesh means it is the home country of bengalis. Now the situation has changed. Bengalis all over the world has a separate homeland. The bengalis of Pakistan have already joined it so it make sense to revisit and ask bengalis of India if they also want to join it. A referendum can be held in Indian bengal and have 2 choices: 1) become part of Bangladesh 2) remain in India. Its up to Indian bengalis to decide if they want freedom or want to stay with India. This is the choice they did not have in 1947.
 
this is your narrative which may be wrong.

In Canada there is a province Quebec where there is a strong sentiment that they have more in common with France (same language & culture) than rest of Canada. Problem is they have no borders with France, heck France is on a different continent. So instead there was a thinking there to separate from Canada and become a new country. So they went to a referendum on freedom from Canada and majority decided to stay with Canada. They can always go to a referendum again on freedom from Canada and choose to become a new country and Canada will not mind.

As you know in 1947, 2 countries (India & Pakistan) were created and both of them had multiple ethnicities with no single ethnicity having more people than all the other ethinicities combined. At that time bengalis did not have their own country so they were divided in India and Pakistan.

But in 1971 a new country specifically for bengalis was created; its name Bangladesh means it is the home country of bengalis. Now the situation has changed. Bengalis all over the world has a separate homeland. The bengalis of Pakistan have already joined it so it make sense to revisit and ask bengalis of India if they also want to join it. A referendum can be held in Indian bengal and have 2 choices: 1) become part of Bangladesh 2) remain in India. Its up to Indian bengalis to decide if they want freedom or want to stay with India. This is the choice they did not have in 1947.

these are the can of worms the indians will be opening.
 
it is the truth that some of our ancestors were hindu. but the fact remains, that i dont give a crap what our ancestors worshipped.

its just that only when india subject bangladesh to what they are doing in kashmir, will make the bangla boys realize their folly in 1971.

Time to move on from 1971.

Young generation of Bangladesh doesn't really care much about it. I am sure most young Pakistanis also don't have interest in it.
 
Time to move on from 1971.

Young generation of Bangladesh doesn't really care much about it. I am sure most young Pakistanis also don't have interest in it.

yeah yeah yeah but answer this question.

If modi were to invade bangladesh to satistfy his hindvta votebank in their quest for akhand bharat (after he has holocasted kashmir) who would stop him, and would anyone care?
 
this is your narrative which may be wrong.

In Canada there is a province Quebec where there is a strong sentiment that they have more in common with France (same language & culture) than rest of Canada. Problem is they have no borders with France, heck France is on a different continent. So instead there was a thinking there to separate from Canada and become a new country. So they went to a referendum on freedom from Canada and majority decided to stay with Canada. They can always go to a referendum again on freedom from Canada and choose to become a new country and Canada will not mind.

As you know in 1947, 2 countries (India & Pakistan) were created and both of them had multiple ethnicities with no single ethnicity having more people than all the other ethinicities combined. At that time bengalis did not have their own country so they were divided in India and Pakistan.

But in 1971 a new country specifically for bengalis was created; its name Bangladesh means it is the home country of bengalis. Now the situation has changed. Bengalis all over the world has a separate homeland. The bengalis of Pakistan have already joined it so it make sense to revisit and ask bengalis of India if they also want to join it. A referendum can be held in Indian bengal and have 2 choices: 1) become part of Bangladesh 2) remain in India. Its up to Indian bengalis to decide if they want freedom or want to stay with India. This is the choice they did not have in 1947.

Infact you are wrong. Hindu bengalis through their representatives voted in 1947 to have a separate hindu majority state that will be with India while muslim majority part will be with pakistan.

Ofcourse this shocked Suhrawardy and other muslim bengali leaders and they had even proposed a united bengal, but again hindu bengalis shot down the idea as they had realised post 1946 that living within a muslim majority bengal was impossible and the western hindu majority part was only sort for its resources.

You will know this if you read about the bengali hindu homeland movement.
 
yeah yeah yeah but answer this question.

If modi were to invade bangladesh to satistfy his hindvta votebank in their quest for akhand bharat (after he has holocasted kashmir) who would stop him, and would anyone care?

Do you seriously think India will invade BD? Be in reality.

Those days of invasions are long gone. India is no USA.
 
Do you seriously think India will invade BD? Be in reality.

Those days of invasions are long gone. India is no USA.

ok then consider this scenario

india goes through a recession.

elections are approaching.

tensions in bengal and assam are at an all time high.

india demands bangladesh take back 'illegal immigrants'

bangladesh refuses

meanwhile modi's followers are urging him on to act. Modi wants to look tough as elections are approaching.

He sees that he got away with kashmir, the international community did nothing, and pakistan did not have the nerve to do anything.

bangladesh is perceived as an easier target with little armed forces to speak of, meanwhile india has overwhelming superiority in land,air,sea and cyberspace, as compared to pakistan.

india has strong economic ties with the world powers and india feels that the world will let her have bangladesh,

after all, the world did nothing when hitler annexed czechoslovakia.

emboldened by this, Hitler sets his eyes on danzig, former german territory held by poland,
and this kickstarted world war 2.

similarly, modi annexes kashmir, no one does anything, modi feels that bangladesh is former indian territory that was removed from india in 1947.

We can draw parallels, history has a way of repeating itself.


So anyway, india invades bangladesh, on account of some false flag incident that occurs on the indian bangladeshi border.

So who will help poor little bangladesh?
no one will.
 
ok then consider this scenario

india goes through a recession.

elections are approaching.

tensions in bengal and assam are at an all time high.

india demands bangladesh take back 'illegal immigrants'

bangladesh refuses

meanwhile modi's followers are urging him on to act. Modi wants to look tough as elections are approaching.

He sees that he got away with kashmir, the international community did nothing, and pakistan did not have the nerve to do anything.

bangladesh is perceived as an easier target with little armed forces to speak of, meanwhile india has overwhelming superiority in land,air,sea and cyberspace, as compared to pakistan.

india has strong economic ties with the world powers and india feels that the world will let her have bangladesh,

after all, the world did nothing when hitler annexed czechoslovakia.

emboldened by this, Hitler sets his eyes on danzig, former german territory held by poland,
and this kickstarted world war 2.

similarly, modi annexes kashmir, no one does anything, modi feels that bangladesh is former indian territory that was removed from india in 1947.

We can draw parallels, history has a way of repeating itself.


So anyway, india invades bangladesh, on account of some false flag incident that occurs on the indian bangladeshi border.

So who will help poor little bangladesh?
no one will.

I understand you are itching to see lots of dead Bangladeshis but your dream is unlikely to materialize. Modern world doesn't work like that.

Invading "poor little Bangladesh" will be a bad decision for India for two reasons -

1) BD doesn't have much valuable resources. It is a small land. India will probably lose troops and people unnecessarily.

2) India is a growing power. They don't want to tarnish their image further by invading countries.

I can't believe you wrote such a big essay on that unlikely scenario.
 
I understand you are itching to see lots of dead Bangladeshis but your dream is unlikely to materialize. Modern world doesn't work like that.

Invading "poor little Bangladesh" will be a bad decision for India for two reasons -

1) BD doesn't have much valuable resources. It is a small land. India will probably lose troops and people unnecessarily.

2) India is a growing power. They don't want to tarnish their image further by invading countries.

I can't believe you wrote such a big essay on that unlikely scenario.

1) who said anything about resources, it is about pleasing his vote bank. Am sure the indians would want to marry bengali women after all the kashmiris are raped and killed.

2) India is a growing power and believes in the one india concept i.e akhand bharat and say bangladesh is part of india, just like kashmir, via some bill passed in the indian parliament.

India has no legal basis to remain in kashmir after article 370 was scrapped, india technically, is occupying another country right now. who says they wont try again?

you can see the voices rumbling about bangladeshi territory. similarly a few years ago, we were hearing voices about revoking article 370 and breaking indus water treaty.
 
1) who said anything about resources, it is about pleasing his vote bank. Am sure the indians would want to marry bengali women after all the kashmiris are raped and killed.

2) India is a growing power and believes in the one india concept i.e akhand bharat and say bangladesh is part of india, just like kashmir, via some bill passed in the indian parliament.

India has no legal basis to remain in kashmir after article 370 was scrapped, india technically, is occupying another country right now. who says they wont try again?

you can see the voices rumbling about bangladeshi territory. similarly a few years ago, we were hearing voices about revoking article 370 and breaking indus water treaty.

Kashmir was never an official country. It is a disputed territory. Bangladesh is a sovereign country.

I don't think India is that stupid to invade an actual country. Bangladesh is quite insignificant geographically. It will be like invading Vanuatu.

Also, present BD government is pro-Indian.
 
[MENTION=147570]warcry[/MENTION] calm down. It's just playing for gallery.
 
India’s nukes along with internet should be taken away so neighboring countries can benefit from peace.
 
Kashmir was never an official country. It is a disputed territory. Bangladesh is a sovereign country.

I don't think India is that stupid to invade an actual country. Bangladesh is quite insignificant geographically. It will be like invading Vanuatu.

Also, present BD government is pro-Indian.

It was historically.

Sindh_700ad.jpg
 
Then pakistan invaded it.

If you read Christopher Snedden's book on Kashmir, the people of Poonch and Gilgit and rose up agianst the princely state and liberated themselves, willfully acceding to Pakistan. Pashtun tribesmen came in latter but there was already a native insurrection.
 
If you read Christopher Snedden's book on Kashmir, the people of Poonch and Gilgit and rose up agianst the princely state and liberated themselves, willfully acceding to Pakistan. Pashtun tribesmen came in latter but there was already a native insurrection.

So you are picking up a time line which is convenient for you yet, discrediting the historical nature of the place.
 
Did you not pay attention during history lessons or do they just teach you falsehoods about India being a major empire that matched the Romans.

You did not answer my question and instead came up with this response.
 
Thats not how it works. They are a separate country. Hindus and muslim bengalis decided that they will have a separate country. Now since the hindu majority part is doing well, the ones from muslim majority part cannot come here.

Believe it or not, illegal Bangladeshis do not come to West Bengal. They actually go to NCR , Bangalore or Hyderabad for job, economic opportunities.

Bangladesh is doing much better in terms of economy when compared to West Bengal, hence there is less appetite for them to settle in West Bengal.
 
India’s nukes along with internet should be taken away so neighboring countries can benefit from peace.

Agreed. Pakistan can sell them in black market and the money can benefit the economy.
 
If you read Christopher Snedden's book on Kashmir, the people of Poonch and Gilgit and rose up agianst the princely state and liberated themselves, willfully acceding to Pakistan. Pashtun tribesmen came in latter but there was already a native insurrection.

If there was a native insurrection and they had deposed Hari Singh and formed a govt in j and k. Then it was different.

Some people revolted and Hari singh quelled or tried to quell the revolt. And then pakistan invaded kashmir, when it was not pakistan's place to intervene.
 
Believe it or not, illegal Bangladeshis do not come to West Bengal. They actually go to NCR , Bangalore or Hyderabad for job, economic opportunities.

Bangladesh is doing much better in terms of economy when compared to West Bengal, hence there is less appetite for them to settle in West Bengal.

They have already overwhelmed bengal and now lots of locals are vocally opposing them. Since its easy for bengalis to detect the bangladeshi dialect, they are now going to other states and claim to be bengali from west bengal.
 
Bangladesh have to take back immigrants. They can't dump their population on others.
This stand by swamy is to enforce that. I hope our Pakistani brothers stand with India on this.
 
Illegal immigrants is a huge problem. Well population as a whole is the biggest problem for sub continent right now, we need to get rid of millions of illegal immigrants then work on population control.
 
I thought the same thing for articl 370. Yet here we are.

Apples and oranges. Can't compare, no Indian government will declare war on BD of all places. BD government has good terms with India.

All these comments are not official government statements. Just random statements from some leaders who are not part of decision making process for these issues.
 
Apples and oranges. Can't compare, no Indian government will declare war on BD of all places. BD government has good terms with India.

All these comments are not official government statements. Just random statements from some leaders who are not part of decision making process for these issues.

Amit Shah has referred to them as termites. I feel that is is time to take what is said by the BJP seriously, as they are in a position to do what they say.

Sheikh Hasina and the Awami league have been loyal servants of India for quite some time now. I am sure, that, when the time comes, the indian govenrment is going to reward them for their loyalty, just as they rewarded mehbooba mufti and all the kashmiri politicians loyal to India and its constitution with house arrest and the ending their political career by making kashmir union territory.
 
Bangladesh have to take back immigrants. They can't dump their population on others.
This stand by swamy is to enforce that. I hope our Pakistani brothers stand with India on this.

I don't think Bangladesh government is dumping population on India. If people sneak in to India illegally, what can government do? Government can't control all people.

Feel free to send them back. I am always against illegal immigration (whether it is Bangladeshi or another nationality).
 
Last edited:
They have already overwhelmed bengal and now lots of locals are vocally opposing them. Since its easy for bengalis to detect the bangladeshi dialect, they are now going to other states and claim to be bengali from west bengal.

That's in a way true.
 
If there was a native insurrection and they had deposed Hari Singh and formed a govt in j and k. Then it was different.

Some people revolted and Hari singh quelled or tried to quell the revolt. And then pakistan invaded kashmir, when it was not pakistan's place to intervene.

You mean the Muslims (which were the majority) revolted and Singh committed genocide oh them which prompted the tribes to start an invasion.
 
Article 370 is Indias internal matter.

Conflict with Bangladesh is external matter.

Big difference.

article 370 was a bilateral agreement between two independent entities, hari singh and the government of india, hence an external matter. kashmir was not considered a part of india by anyone before.

anyway, bangladesh is a part of india in the akhand bharat framework, therefore conflict with bangladesh is an internal matter just like how kashmir is being presented as an internal matter.
 
Amit Shah has referred to them as termites. I feel that is is time to take what is said by the BJP seriously, as they are in a position to do what they say.

Sheikh Hasina and the Awami league have been loyal servants of India for quite some time now. I am sure, that, when the time comes, the indian govenrment is going to reward them for their loyalty, just as they rewarded mehbooba mufti and all the kashmiri politicians loyal to India and its constitution with house arrest and the ending their political career by making kashmir union territory.

Amit Shah called who termites? Illegal immigrants?

Kashmir and BD are totally different. No Indian thinks of BD as part of India or want it to be part of India. We recognize it as a sovereign nation and only want normal ties with BD.
 
Amit Shah called who termites? Illegal immigrants?

Kashmir and BD are totally different. No Indian thinks of BD as part of India or want it to be part of India. We recognize it as a sovereign nation and only want normal ties with BD.

i would suggest you read the title of the thread:

Bangladesh will have to handover land to India from Khulna to Sylhet: Subramanian Swamy
 
i would suggest you read the title of the thread:

Bangladesh will have to handover land to India from Khulna to Sylhet: Subramanian Swamy

Swamy has been saying such things for a long time. It's like your Zaid Hamid guy, don't take him seriously.

You are getting scared about nothing. BD and India have amicable relations and will continue to have good relations for a decade at the bare minimum.
 
Swamy has been saying such things for a long time. It's like your Zaid Hamid guy, don't take him seriously.

You are getting scared about nothing. BD and India have amicable relations and will continue to have good relations for a decade at the bare minimum.

Zaid Hamid is not a part of the current ruling party. Swamy is part of the ruling party. Neither do i see anyone from the BJP denouncing these statements.

i can see that the bangaldeshis have their heads buried in the sand and refuse to see eye to eye with the looming reality of akhand bharat. Even if i am wrong and india has no plans to annex bangladesh, it would be prudent for bangladesh to start developing a nuclear deterrent of their own, just in case.

But I dont see that happening until it is too late. such steps require visionary leadership ,not indian bootlickers.
 
Zaid Hamid is not a part of the current ruling party. Swamy is part of the ruling party. Neither do i see anyone from the BJP denouncing these statements.

i can see that the bangaldeshis have their heads buried in the sand and refuse to see eye to eye with the looming reality of akhand bharat. Even if i am wrong and india has no plans to annex bangladesh, it would be prudent for bangladesh to start developing a nuclear deterrent of their own, just in case.

But I dont see that happening until it is too late. such steps require visionary leadership ,not indian bootlickers.

One believes what they want to believe.

Swamy and other politicians give statements to please certain sections of the crowd. It does not mean they actually believe it will happen.
There is no gain for India to start a war that too against BD. The land is minimal, the strategic location is not of much value, population of BD is way too much. What is the gain? Using force will only cause more issues for us and increase terror threats in the area.
No one is loony enough to start that for no reason.

You need to get out of the fantasy land you are living in and stop living in such fear.
 
Back
Top