What's new

Breaking news of Osama raid to Pakistan was easier than thought, says Obama

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
WASHINGTON: Barack Obama has claimed in his memoirs that breaking the news to Pakistan of a US raid into Abbottabad to kill Osama bin Laden was easier than he had expected as the then president Asif Ali Zardari understood the US position.

The book — “A Promised Land” — was released on Tuesday and gives a blow-by-blow account of the raid by American commandos that killed the world’s most wanted terrorist on May 2, 2011 inside his compound in Abbottabad.

Obama wrote that he knew ordering a military strike inside an allied state violated its sovereignty but he decided to go for it as he did not want to miss the chance to take out the Al Qaeda leader.

“Whatever we chose to do in Abbottabad, then, would involve violating the territory of a putative ally in the most egregious way possible, short of war- raising both the diplomatic stakes and the operational complexities,” he wrote.

The former US president revealed that his two closest aides, the then vice president Joe Biden and defence secretary Robert Gates opposed the raid. The revelation shows why Obama released the book after the Nov. 3 elections as it would have hurt Biden, who is now the President-elect.

After the raid, Obama called many American and world leaders, including the then president of Pakistan.

Zardari “showed genuine emotion, recalling how his wife, Benazir Bhutto, had been killed by extremists with reported ties to Al Qaeda,” Obama wrote.

“I expected my most difficult call to be with Pakistan’s beleaguered president, Asif Ali Zardari, who would surely face a backlash at home over our violation of Pakistani sovereignty,” he wrote.

“When I reached him, however, he expressed congratulations and support. ‘Whatever the fallout,' he said, ‘it’s very good news'."

Obama then asked his military Chief, Mike Mullen, to call his counterpart in Pakistan.

“Mullen had put a call in to Pakistan’s army chief, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, and while the conversation had been polite, Kayani had requested that we come clean on the raid and its target as quickly as possible in order to help his people manage the reaction of the Pakistani public,” he said.

Obama said he ruled out involving Pakistan in the raid because he believed that certain elements inside Pakistan maintained links to the Taliban and perhaps even Al Qaeda.

He wrote that when it became increasingly clear that Bin Laden was living in a hideout in Abbottabad, he decided to go for the kill.

“Based on what I’d heard, I decided we had enough information to begin developing options for an attack on the compound. While the CIA team continued to work on identifying the Pacer, I asked Tom Donilon and John Brennan to explore what a raid would look like,” he wrote.

“The need for secrecy added to the challenge; if even the slightest hint of our lead on bin Laden leaked, we knew our opportunity would be lost. As a result, only a handful of people across the entire federal government were read into the planning phase of the operation,” he said.

Although he acknowledged that “Pakistan’s government cooperated with us on a host of counterterrorism operations and provided a vital supply path for our forces in Afghanistan,” he decided not to share the information with Islamabad.

“The fact that the Abbottabad compound was just a few miles from the Pakistan military’s equivalent of West Point only heightened the possibility that anything we told the Pakistanis could end up tipping off our target,” he added.

Published in Dawn, November 18th, 2020
 
Get the feeling the conversations would have been far less amicable had Imran and Bajwa been in the respective leadership positions at the time, not that it would have made a tangible difference.
 
The Obama episode completely destroyed whatever little credibility Pakistan had.

Whether we acknowledged that we knew about his whereabouts or denied any knowledge, it made us look really bad.
 
I'm certain that under the leadership of imran, Barack Obama would not have violated Pakistan's territory, clearly showed the lack of genuine pride under the corrupt leadership of zardari at the time.
 
I'm certain that under the leadership of imran, Barack Obama would not have violated Pakistan's territory, clearly showed the lack of genuine pride under the corrupt leadership of zardari at the time.

Yeah true, only true Pakistani pride would defend an Osama Bin Laden..
 
Find it hard to believe Pakistan was not complicit in this operation. But it’s not in our interest to admit so. Better to look fools than to appear complicit with the Americans...the latter would evoke a much more rabid reaction.
 
No surprise Mr 10% was President at the time. Wouldn't take 10% of much at all to persuade him to sign up to whatever narrative was handy for the US at the time.
 
Nothing good ever came of Pakistan getting into the Cold War between the US and Soviet Union since the 1980s. Some would say the aftereffects are still carrying on to present day.
 
Yeah true, only true Pakistani pride would defend an Osama Bin Laden..

If you can believe that the body was thrown in to the sea to stop people from using his burial site as a shrine, then you can believe that the States kept Pakistan "out" of the operation to prevent attacks from Afghan militias and the Pakistan Wing of the Taliban.
 
Nothing good ever came of Pakistan getting into the Cold War between the US and Soviet Union since the 1980s. Some would say the aftereffects are still carrying on to present day.
Still haunting us. Terrible decisions made affected our generations.
 
Pakistan could have handled it much better. But what do we know? There might have been different, concealed factors at play. But at the surface it looks like a big mess up.
 
If you can believe that the body was thrown in to the sea to stop people from using his burial site as a shrine, then you can believe that the States kept Pakistan "out" of the operation to prevent attacks from Afghan militias and the Pakistan Wing of the Taliban.

I never for once believed the body was thrown in the sea. I heard reports that his body was savaged by the American forces even his head was allegedly cut off and they could not show it to public due to the pure brutality of it.
 
I never for once believed the body was thrown in the sea. I heard reports that his body was savaged by the American forces even his head was allegedly cut off and they could not show it to public due to the pure brutality of it.

The head (and the body) are perhaps still preserved in jars of spirit in some secret US facility somewhere.
 
I never for once believed the body was thrown in the sea. I heard reports that his body was savaged by the American forces even his head was allegedly cut off and they could not show it to public due to the pure brutality of it.

If thats the case then wouldn't it have been easier to just be truthful at the time?
i.e. "He was blown to smithereen", instead of "we buried him in the sea so people would not worship his grave"...

Honestly, some of the stuff being peddled is like a chapter out of the Indian version of Wag the Dog,
Surgical strikes... may be they were inspired by the way the Americans spin the truth?
 
If thats the case then wouldn't it have been easier to just be truthful at the time?
i.e. "He was blown to smithereen", instead of "we buried him in the sea so people would not worship his grave"...

Honestly, some of the stuff being peddled is like a chapter out of the Indian version of Wag the Dog,
Surgical strikes... may be they were inspired by the way the Americans spin the truth?

Who knows man, but the fact he was in Pakistan would be the bigger issue as it made Pakistan look terrible in front of the international community..
 
Who knows man, but the fact he was in Pakistan would be the bigger issue as it made Pakistan look terrible in front of the international community..

It certainly did make Pakistan look bad but there are also a ton of reasons for this and why it was allowed...

Most would be just conspiracy theories but the one that seems believable is the fact that Zardari was Prime Minister at the time and I doubt there is little he would not do for power and money.
 
^^^
This man and his party have a history of stealing land, blocking streets, stealing from the people (hence the nickname Mr 10%), literally defecating on the heads of the poor people.. someone like this doesn't care about the image of Pakistan. Far from it.
 
If you can believe that the body was thrown in to the sea to stop people from using his burial site as a shrine, then you can believe that the States kept Pakistan "out" of the operation to prevent attacks from Afghan militias and the Pakistan Wing of the Taliban.

^^^
This man and his party have a history of stealing land, blocking streets, stealing from the people (hence the nickname Mr 10%), literally defecating on the heads of the poor people.. someone like this doesn't care about the image of Pakistan. Far from it.

I know Zadari is corrupt but still not as bad as my Italian waitress Ammayi Sonya, the owner of the Indian Congress party, she has looted over a Billion back to her Italy..
 
People are having a laugh if they think that the federal government at the time had anything to do with Osama hiding and getting military protection in Pakistan.

When it comes to these sensitive matters, the PM/President/Defense Minister have as much information and knowledge as the common man on the street.

I highly doubt if COAS Kayani and the ISI Chief even bothered to inform Zardari that they were hiding and protecting Osama in Abbottabad.
 
^^^
Yet Pakistan continued to receive billions of dollars of aid from the States, weapons (including F16's) and were allowed to keep their nukes. Not once were they publicly rebuked by those in power (Obama etc) for harbouring Osama.
 
Last edited:
I never for once believed the body was thrown in the sea. I heard reports that his body was savaged by the American forces even his head was allegedly cut off and they could not show it to public due to the pure brutality of it.

But but but is that the same Osama who was funded by the yanks to defeat the Soviets.
 
^^^
Yet Pakistan continued to receive billions of dollars of aid from the States, weapons (including F16's) and were allowed to keep their nukes. Not once were they publicly rebuked by those in power (Obama etc) for harbouring Osama.

Yeah, Obama was residing half a mile away from Pakistan’s military camp and our military and intelligence didn’t have a clue. How interesting.
 
The same Osama who the Americans were supplying military arsenal to defeat the soviets
 
Last edited:
Back
Top