What's new

Pakistan will not send forces to Gaza to disarm Hamas, says DPM

emranabbas

ODI Debutant
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Runs
11,776
ISLAMABAD (Web Desk) - Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar said on Saturday Pakistan was willing to contribute to an international peacekeeping force in Gaza, though it would not deploy troops to disarm or de-weaponise Hamas.

“If they say that we should go and start fighting, disarm Hamas, de-weaponise them, and go and destroy the tunnels that Hamas has built until now, that is not our job,” Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar told reporters during a year-end briefing in Islamabad.

He emphasised there was clarity between civil and military leadership over the matter.

“We have a very complete understanding on this matter that we cannot do that kind of work,” he added.

The deputy prime minister said Pakistan had been using the term “peacekeeping” and had never used the phrase “peace enforcement” while discussing the force.

“I have been very clear: Pakistan will be happy to join if the mandate is not peace enforcement and disarming and de-weaponising Hamas.”

Dar said Pakistan would not land its forces in Palestine to “fight Muslims.”

 
ISLAMABAD (Web Desk) - Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar said on Saturday Pakistan was willing to contribute to an international peacekeeping force in Gaza, though it would not deploy troops to disarm or de-weaponise Hamas.

“If they say that we should go and start fighting, disarm Hamas, de-weaponise them, and go and destroy the tunnels that Hamas has built until now, that is not our job,” Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar told reporters during a year-end briefing in Islamabad.

He emphasised there was clarity between civil and military leadership over the matter.

“We have a very complete understanding on this matter that we cannot do that kind of work,” he added.

The deputy prime minister said Pakistan had been using the term “peacekeeping” and had never used the phrase “peace enforcement” while discussing the force.

“I have been very clear: Pakistan will be happy to join if the mandate is not peace enforcement and disarming and de-weaponising Hamas.”

Dar said Pakistan would not land its forces in Palestine to “fight Muslims.”

Why did PK even consider sending their troops to help Israel. Anyone with an ounce of knowledge knows that Israel wants a greater Israel and that includes Gaza, West Bank, parts of Syria and Iraq.
The Question is when did the PK people ask for "their soldiers" to be part of the so called peace keeping force?
Here is the reality- a oath breaker promises Trump and Epstein controlled World powers that he would bring PK on board. Now he knows he cant deliver without a backlash because he has no support. Suddenly he is behind bulllet proof glass in meetings and wearing bullet proof vests.
 
ISLAMABAD (Web Desk) - Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar said on Saturday Pakistan was willing to contribute to an international peacekeeping force in Gaza, though it would not deploy troops to disarm or de-weaponise Hamas.

“If they say that we should go and start fighting, disarm Hamas, de-weaponise them, and go and destroy the tunnels that Hamas has built until now, that is not our job,” Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar told reporters during a year-end briefing in Islamabad.

He emphasised there was clarity between civil and military leadership over the matter.

“We have a very complete understanding on this matter that we cannot do that kind of work,” he added.

The deputy prime minister said Pakistan had been using the term “peacekeeping” and had never used the phrase “peace enforcement” while discussing the force.

“I have been very clear: Pakistan will be happy to join if the mandate is not peace enforcement and disarming and de-weaponising Hamas.”

Dar said Pakistan would not land its forces in Palestine to “fight Muslims.”

BTW has Iran been asked for a peace keeping force. If not, why not?
 
Why did PK even consider sending their troops to help Israel. Anyone with an ounce of knowledge knows that Israel wants a greater Israel and that includes Gaza, West Bank, parts of Syria and Iraq.
The Question is when did the PK people ask for "their soldiers" to be part of the so called peace keeping force?
Here is the reality- a oath breaker promises Trump and Epstein controlled World powers that he would bring PK on board. Now he knows he cant deliver without a backlash because he has no support. Suddenly he is behind bulllet proof glass in meetings and wearing bullet proof vests.

If you get your news from neutral sources, ans not from Imran Riaz, Shahbaz Gill, or other PTI-linked figures, you would know that this has always been the stance:

Pakistan sends troops for peacekeeping missions, not to “help Israel.”

That narrative is simply propaganda pushed by people like Imran Riaz and Shahbaz Gill to brainwash peope like you.

I know this will go over your head so let me put it very simply for you.

Pakistan sends soldiers only to keep peace, not to fight. Their job is to stop fighting, help people, and keep everyone safe. This is called peacekeeping, and it is about helping, not fighting someone's war. Like israel is the aggressor pakistans job is to protect the Palestinians.
 
If you get your news from neutral sources, ans not from Imran Riaz, Shahbaz Gill, or other PTI-linked figures, you would know that this has always been the stance:

Pakistan sends troops for peacekeeping missions, not to “help Israel.”

That narrative is simply propaganda pushed by people like Imran Riaz and Shahbaz Gill to brainwash peope like you.

I know this will go over your head so let me put it very simply for you.

Pakistan sends soldiers only to keep peace, not to fight. Their job is to stop fighting, help people, and keep everyone safe. This is called peacekeeping, and it is about helping, not fighting someone's war. Like israel is the aggressor pakistans job is to protect the Palestinians.
Who wanted these troops to go? Was it the PK people or the Zionists that control the World order? Who came up with idea? Maybe it was Trump, the self proclaimed 1st Jewish President of America. Who came with the idea?
 
And for the rest of your post pakistan has been in the UN peace making program since 1947 wheb they joined UN

Pakistan sent its first peacekeeping troops in 1960 to the UN mission in Congo.
 
Who wanted these troops to go? Was it the PK people or the Zionists that control the World order? Who came up with idea? Maybe it was Trump, the self proclaimed 1st Jewish President of America. Who came with the idea?
For your information the zionist dont want pakistan to be there because they think pakistan will be bias because of their support for Palestine
 
You will need to dig out pakistan prime mister from 50's and 60's Iskander Mirza from his grave and ask him why he joined united nations peace making program
So when you cant find anyone, blame a dead and anyway what does that have to do with what Munir does in 2025.
So once again who asked for it?
 
So when you cant find anyone, blame a dead and anyway what does that have to do with what Munir does in 2025.
So once again who asked for it?
Because we are part of united nations peace making program and this isnt the first peace making program we are taking part in we have always been part of it so if un considered us why is it a problem?
 
Here is the full list

Congo (1960–present) – Pakistan’s first UN peacekeeping mission

Sierra Leone – Disarmament and civilian protection

Liberia – Post-war stabilisation

Somalia – Humanitarian protection

Bosnia & Herzegovina – Post-war peace enforcement

Kosovo – Peace and security operations

Darfur (Sudan) – Civilian protection

South Sudan – Ongoing peacekeeping

Haiti – Stability and law support

Cyprus – Buffer zone monitoring
 
Here is the full list

Congo (1960–present) – Pakistan’s first UN peacekeeping mission

Sierra Leone – Disarmament and civilian protection

Liberia – Post-war stabilisation

Somalia – Humanitarian protection

Bosnia & Herzegovina – Post-war peace enforcement

Kosovo – Peace and security operations

Darfur (Sudan) – Civilian protection

South Sudan – Ongoing peacekeeping

Haiti – Stability and law support

Cyprus – Buffer zone monitoring

Stop hiding behind media cell crao
Are you saying PK has to send troops to Occupied Gaza. Can you show the exact part where its obligatory.
 
Because we are part of united nations peace making program and this isnt the first peace making program we are taking part in we have always been part of it so if un considered us why is it a problem?
I asked you whose idea was it? Was it Trump or Munir. Its not a difficult question. There is no mandatory requirement to send troops. Did Munir volunteer or did Trump Request. Simple Question
 
Oh dear you kacked already. What does that have to do with 2025. Is it obligatory to join? And can you show the part where Ayub Khan made it obligatory for PK? 🤣🤣🥰

Why is it a problem if Pakistan is involved in protecting Palestinians and looking after their safety as part of peace-making efforts?

Peace-making is about protecting civilians, reducing violence, and stopping further bloodshed, not supporting one side against another.

If the goal is to save innocent lives, allow humanitarian access, and help restore calm, then questioning that role makes no sense.

Instead of spreading propaganda you should understand that peace-making exists to prevent more suffering, and any country contributing to that effort is helping humanity
 
I asked you whose idea was it? Was it Trump or Munir. Its not a difficult question. There is no mandatory requirement to send troops. Did Munir volunteer or did Trump Request. Simple Question

Gaza peace-making is a United nation led idea if you know what that is. Its not trump or munir

Imran riaz and shabaz gill has made you really dumb
 
Why is it a problem if Pakistan is involved in protecting Palestinians and looking after their safety as part of peace-making efforts?

Peace-making is about protecting civilians, reducing violence, and stopping further bloodshed, not supporting one side against another.

If the goal is to save innocent lives, allow humanitarian access, and help restore calm, then questioning that role makes no sense.

Instead of spreading propaganda you should understand that peace-making exists to prevent more suffering, and any country contributing to that effort is helping humanity
You gormless idiot. They are not protecting the Palestinians, the Zionists are going to use them to keep the Palestinians down. When Hamas fight back against whoever the so called peacekeepers are, the Zionists will use this as propaganda telling the World that Palestinians love violence and use this as excuse to attack the Palestinians again.
If the PKs secured an agreement that will give the Palestinians a viable state then great but a gormless idiot like cant even see what Netanyahu and his death cult want. Netanyahu, Ben Gavir and the Greater Israel guys will never allow them.
 
Gaza peace-making is a United nation led idea if you know what that is. Its not trump or munir

Imran riaz and shabaz gill has made you really dumb

Then why is Shitanyahu refusing Turkish Forces as part of the peace keeping force. Clearly, the zionests and the Yanks are making the decisions.

 
Thats why I call him the Pakistani @Devadwal. He will get shown up day in day out, but unashamedly, he will start up again where he started the day before as if nothing happened..
I am amazed that this guy is talking so much crap. Our Palestinian brothers have sacrificed so much and the last thing they need is the Arab Zionists( MBS) and the PKs to wash away their sacrifices and be held prisoner forever in their land and all because Munir made stupid promises to stay in power.
 
Then why is Shitanyahu refusing Turkish Forces as part of the peace keeping force. Clearly, the zionests and the Yanks are making the decisions.


 
Sending troops to Gaza is the best of a bad situation to try to bring and end to this genocide. It is not a positive, overall it is a shame for all Muslim nations, but it is not as much of a negative as being spun either.
It's certainly not pro Israel.
 
Then why is Shitanyahu refusing Turkish Forces as part of the peace keeping force. Clearly, the zionests and the Yanks are making the decisions.

Obviously they have an input to the decision. All the cards are in their hands. Palestinians have been massacred. If these guys have their way then they would continue the massacre and build casinos in Gaza.

Somehow Muslim countries have got some concession, a small one, which is keep the Palestinians in the land we will help enforce the security, no more terrorism will happen just let them live.

The fake Israeli excuse of removing Hamas is then taken off the table.
 
Sending troops to Gaza is the best of a bad situation to try to bring and end to this genocide. It is not a positive, overall it is a shame for all Muslim nations, but it is not as much of a negative as being spun either.
It's certainly not pro Israel.
If this is a genuine peace keeping force then I would welcome it. However, Netanyahu has interest in peace and if you look at the recognition of Somaliland by Israel, you see what they are planning with the Gazan Palestinians.
 
Obviously they have an input to the decision. All the cards are in their hands. Palestinians have been massacred. If these guys have their way then they would continue the massacre and build casinos in Gaza.

Somehow Muslim countries have got some concession, a small one, which is keep the Palestinians in the land we will help enforce the security, no more terrorism will happen just let them live.

The fake Israeli excuse of removing Hamas is then taken off the table.

I dont see any concessions for muslim nations. Muslim forces as part of the peace keeping force will be a token gesture. Who will off course be Poodles to the zionests.

Hopefully im wrong.
 
If this is a genuine peace keeping force then I would welcome it. However, Netanyahu has interest in peace and if you look at the recognition of Somaliland by Israel, you see what they are planning with the Gazan Palestinians.
He has no interest in peace, but even small percent of a chance to stop this massacre is worth taking.
 
He has no interest in peace, but even small percent of a chance to stop this massacre is worth taking.

I honestly don’t know what is wrong with these people. It’s like they actually want Palestinians to keep suffering.

If there is even the slightest chance that Pakistani troops on the ground could help protect Palestinian civilians, keep them safe, or reduce the killing of innocent palistanian lives , then that should be welcomed, not attacked.

Opposing any effort that could save innocent innocent palistanian , women, and children is not “principled,” it’s cruel and heartless. When people argue against protection and safety, they’re basically saying suffering is acceptable

Just because they dont like pakistani government and pakistani army why should the palistanian's suffer
 
He has no interest in peace, but even small percent of a chance to stop this massacre is worth taking.
If you look at the plan, its to either kill the Palestinians or ethnically cleanse Gaza of Palestinians. The Israelis have no other plan. The Palestinians have been let down by the Saudis and Qataris in particular. PK the leaders could have brought pressure on both these to get tough on Israeli but our leaders have no moral authority. Imagine Munir saying to Saudi that you help to stop the murder of Palestinians, and they turn around and say but you have killed 100s, who the hell are you.
 
He has no interest in peace, but even small percent of a chance to stop this massacre is worth taking.
The impasse is this. The Israelis want the international force to do their work, whereas the potential International force nations are saying that we are not their to fight with the Palestinians.
 
I honestly don’t know what is wrong with these people. It’s like they actually want Palestinians to keep suffering.

If there is even the slightest chance that Pakistani troops on the ground could help protect Palestinian civilians, keep them safe, or reduce the killing of innocent palistanian lives , then that should be welcomed, not attacked.

Opposing any effort that could save innocent innocent palistanian , women, and children is not “principled,” it’s cruel and heartless. When people argue against protection and safety, they’re basically saying suffering is acceptable

Just because they dont like pakistani government and pakistani army why should the palistanian's suffer
[/QUOTE

Theyve been suffering for best part of 80 years, not since Trump and Shitanyahu announced this Token gesture of a peace keeping force.
 
I honestly don’t know what is wrong with these people. It’s like they actually want Palestinians to keep suffering.

If there is even the slightest chance that Pakistani troops on the ground could help protect Palestinian civilians, keep them safe, or reduce the killing of innocent palistanian lives , then that should be welcomed, not attacked.

Opposing any effort that could save innocent innocent palistanian , women, and children is not “principled,” it’s cruel and heartless. When people argue against protection and safety, they’re basically saying suffering is acceptable

Just because they dont like pakistani government and pakistani army why should the palistanian's suffer
In addition, Hamas has accepted the need to disarm.

I think people somehow still think that there is a chance of wiping out Israel and that accepting this deal is selling out Palestinians, as if they were on course to take control of this conflict.

The reality is that Israel wiping out Palestinians is more realistic.

Anything that can be done stop this madness must be done....and right now Netanyahu has all of the control so it is obvious that some of his demands will have to met too.
 
I honestly don’t know what is wrong with these people. It’s like they actually want Palestinians to keep suffering.

If there is even the slightest chance that Pakistani troops on the ground could help protect Palestinian civilians, keep them safe, or reduce the killing of innocent palistanian lives , then that should be welcomed, not attacked.

Opposing any effort that could save innocent innocent palistanian , women, and children is not “principled,” it’s cruel and heartless. When people argue against protection and safety, they’re basically saying suffering is acceptable

Just because they dont like pakistani government and pakistani army why should the palistanian's suffer
What do you think Netanyahu and Ben Gavir have planned for the Palestinians. There is no Hamas in The West Bank and the Palestinians are still being murdered( over a 1000 since OCTOBER 23) the settlements are growing and the farms being destroyed. So what do you think the plan is?
 
If you look at the plan, its to either kill the Palestinians or ethnically cleanse Gaza of Palestinians. The Israelis have no other plan. The Palestinians have been let down by the Saudis and Qataris in particular. PK the leaders could have brought pressure on both these to get tough on Israeli but our leaders have no moral authority. Imagine Munir saying to Saudi that you help to stop the murder of Palestinians, and they turn around and say but you have killed 100s, who the hell are you.
The reality is that they will say don't talk too much or we will deport all the lorry drivers and taxi drivers from Pakistan. Same thing they said to Imran.

Confronting Israel is beyond the means of any Muslim country. Even Iran only hit when they themselves were attacked, otherwise they snuck around through proxys. Nobody has intervened in this genocide.
 
In addition, Hamas has accepted the need to disarm.

I think people somehow still think that there is a chance of wiping out Israel and that accepting this deal is selling out Palestinians, as if they were on course to take control of this conflict.

The reality is that Israel wiping out Palestinians is more realistic.

Anything that can be done stop this madness must be done....and right now Netanyahu has all of the control so it is obvious that some of his demands will have to met too.

Pakistan are clear with their stance, pakistan will not disarm Hamas, de-weaponise Hamas , or destroy tunnels that Hamas has built this is the reason why Netanyahu don't want pakistan to be part of this peacekeeping plan.
 
What do you think Netanyahu and Ben Gavir have planned for the Palestinians. There is no Hamas in The West Bank and the Palestinians are still being murdered( over a 1000 since OCTOBER 23) the settlements are growing and the farms being destroyed. So what do you think the plan is?
I dont have time for childish idiots like you. Your going on ignore
 
I dont have time for childish idiots like you. Your going on ignore
Oh dear. All because you lied and lied again. I asked you when did Ayub make it mandatory for us to join peacekeepers in 2025. Its mandatory so Lie exposed

I asked you who came up with idea to send troops? You wanted to give credit for a problem no one asked them to solve except Munir it offered himself( look at Marco Rubio statement) to save himself.
I asked you what Netanyahu and Gavir wanted to do with Palestinians and you kack it.
 
Any of these PTI guys who justify or support the killing of Palestinian lives and don't want the pakistani government to support the Palestinians are getting ignored. I’ve already put one of them on ignore, and the rest can follow.
 
Please no! Enough of this BS to keep sacrificing Pakistani lives and resources. Pakistan need not be a puppet for the western powers and their 3D chess games. Do we have 100% peace in Pakistan now? Then don't we need these soldiers and related resources to maintain order and peace in Pakistan in the first place before expending whatever precious few resources that Pakistan has towards someone else's wars? Where were these Arab nations when Pakistan has been reeling with one spate of violence after another? Then why should Pakistan stick its neck out for them just because these external forces somehow manage to convince Pakistan's corrupt elite.
 
Back
Top