What's new

Cameron’s ICC vision: T20 leagues running concurrently like football, less international cricket

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,132
Former West Indies cricket boss Dave Cameron, who is harbouring ambitions of being the next ICC chairman, envisions a cricket universe where there is more emphasis on private T20 leagues running concurrently and lesser focus on international cricket calendar.

While Cameron has thrown his hat in the ring, Cricket West Indies (CWI) doesn’t support his candidature for the top post in global body.

Sharing his blueprint for world cricket, Cameron, who was Cricket West Indies head between 2013 and 2019, has proposed a longer IPL and wants all the T20 leagues to run concurrently like top tier football leagues like EPL, La Liga and Serie A which starts around same time.

“(Playing) Test cricket should be a choice for smaller teams like Afghanistan and Ireland, it should not be mandatory,” Cameron told PTI in an exclusive interview.

England’s Colin Graves is seen as the front-runner for ICC Chairman’s post and India’s Sourav Ganguly could also throw his hat into the ring. At least two votes from the ICC board are needed to run for Chairmanship and Cameron said he has secured that.

“I have those votes I don’t think it will change. I am still waiting hear about Ganguly’s future in the ICC. They have not finalised the election process yet,” said Cameron.

Talking about his vision for world cricket, Cameron had a lot to say.

“It is a vision which includes growing the game outside the sub-continent, we need to grow in China and other places. It is a plan that has to include India. Any globalisation will require investments from India (who generates 80 percent of game’s revenues).

“I see longer a IPL, I see longer leagues in Australia and England. The most profitable events we have now is T20 leagues and we need to grow that, take them to places like US and grow the opportunities have more players to participate in those leagues and have less international cricket, leading to more profitability.

“This thing of trying to do more ICC events is not going to help the smaller countries because there is not enough space in the calendar.”
Cameron said fans only want to see competitive cricket, which also has a lot more commercial value.

“For example, a team like the West Indies plays less international games in a year but their players are able to play in the best leagues around the world and then they come to play for the country.

“That way players make more money, their board will not have to spend money on retaining its best players and we focus on continuous development of the sport with that money.”

Asked if too much focus on the shortest format will kill ODIs and Test cricket, he said: “We are living in a capitalist world. We are trying to talk about tradition versus what the players want. The players want to be paid.

“Yes Test cricket is great and it is a tradition and it will survive for another few years between the big countries (India, England, Australia) but the truth is smaller counties like Afghanistan and Ireland should not be forced to play Test cricket until they can be competitive. You are wasting resources.

“Like women’s cricket, they should play only ODIs and T20s.”

Cameron feels the football model doesn’t need to be followed blindly but cricket can still learn a lot from it.

“A lot of T20 leagues need to run concurrently, which is not happening ow. Everybody wants to not clash with the other guys. The IPL needs to happen alongside BPL, CPL and Big Bash and the best players will get picked in the best leagues.

“There will be room for everyone including the Indian players who are unsold in the IPL. They have the opportunity to play elsewhere (if BCCI allows). One has to make a decision on tradition versus profitability.”

Cameron also doesn’t see commercial sense in the ongoing World Test Championship though he feels top nations can continue playing against each other. Another aspect of the game he wants reviewed is bilateral cricket.

“That has to change. Right now the host keeps all the revenues. A fee has to be negotiated for the visiting team depending on its quality.

The series which just finished in England, West Indies cricket did not earn a penny. That doesn’t make commercial sense.”

He was also not surprised when T20 World Cup was postponed, making way for the IPL in the same window.

“The IPL is way a more valuable product than the the T20 World Cup. Let’s be very clear about that.

“India will make a lot more money and so as the players. The players themselves would prefer would playing in IPL than the World Cup,” he added.

https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/dave-camerons-icc-internationa-cricket-6530937/
 
So first he destroys West Indies cricket.

Now he wants to destroy ICC and international cricket.

The recent audit report into CWI revealed how much of a crook this guy is.
 
So first he destroys West Indies cricket.

Now he wants to destroy ICC and international cricket.

The recent audit report into CWI revealed how much of a crook this guy is.

Exactly my thoughts - am afraid this gentleman only sees $$$s - he has nothing to say for love of the game.
 
I hope this clown never becomes chairman.

We shouldn't replace international cricket with circus cricket.
 
If that happens, I'll pretty much stop watching cricket. I just can't be a fan of a club the same way I am of a country. Not even only a cricket thing. I love soccer but pretty much never watch any club games, only watch the World Cup and Euros. I just can't back a club the same way I can a country, especially when the players representing the club are from all over the place.
 
it might not be pretty what hes saying, but its the way the sport will eventually go. the big 3 dont wanna talk about it because they know, esp in eng and aus they would start losing current fans.

the future of the sport fundamentally depends on whether english and aus fan want international cricket with multiple teams to continue enough to make it financially viable.
 
Reading his comments and trying to understand his vision I am afraid that if its acted upon as he is saying it might turn out to be a golden egg story.

Cricket is a sport which is played in handful of countries and is highly dependent upon international cricket to maintain its fan base and popularity. Cricket has three formats at international level unlike other sports and they all play a role in creating the brand of cricket. Playing test cricket and ODI cricket adds onto the brand values of players as well as cricket as a whole.

Indians watch IPL because they get to see Kohli, Sharma, Stokes, Rabada etc. and their brands were made through international cricket and then transitioned and further expanded through league cricket. Same is the case with other local T20 leagues where brand power is highly dependent upon stature in international cricket and not the other way round. I doubt without international cricket any league is gonna have enough star power to attract random people let alone cricket purists.

In my opinion if T20 leagues are going to take forefront in future, cricket is gonna get further behind other sports let alone forward. The money he is talking about is associated the brand of cricket and players which might milk revenue generation through T20 cricket however T20 cricket without the initial raw ingredients and support from the branding which international cricket provides can die a sudden death.

I doubt T20 leagues have enough capacity to keep people involved throughout the year without getting monotonous. Even for local fans T20 leagues for a month or so long get tedious as its doesnt have as many pure dynamics to it as any sports and other formats of cricket itself. So in my opinion T20 cricket or league cricket wont be able to survive stand alone.

You cant have brands like Kohli, Stokes, Babar etc formed through league cricket and without those brands you cant bring in people.
 
If that happens, I'll pretty much stop watching cricket. I just can't be a fan of a club the same way I am of a country. Not even only a cricket thing. I love soccer but pretty much never watch any club games, only watch the World Cup and Euros. I just can't back a club the same way I can a country, especially when the players representing the club are from all over the place.

Same. I don't care about stupid T20 cricket (that too circus leagues).

I don't care what Mumbai Indians or Brisbane Heat achieves.
 
Cricket isn't football/soccer. This guy wants to FIFA the ICC without the FIFA money. Bad idea.
 
Same. I don't care about stupid T20 cricket (that too circus leagues).

I don't care what Mumbai Indians or Brisbane Heat achieves.

I get burnt out from the PSL in 3 weeks. Couldn't imagine any of these T20 leagues being 6-8 months long.
 
Cricket leagues are a joke and they can never match football leagues.

Those who think cricket can be like football, can they answer following questions?

1.) Which player in football plays for 2-3 different leagues?
2.) Have you seen any football league that ends within 3 months?
3.) If there is no international cricket, who will create international superstars for IPL? And how will your franchises find them?
4.) Who will scout for talent?
5.) Do you even know how many countries play football?
6.) Which domestic football league has been played overseas lol?

The last time cricket tried to be like Football was when they started this Champions League type of tournament and failed miserably. :inti
 
I dont understand why administrators want cricket to be famous like football. It is never gonna happen. Cricket is pretty popular as is there is no need to come up with new gimmicks or try to lure new countries into playing it. I am afraid trying to populatize cricket old fans will be lost and cricket wont be same anymore. It will a bit like baseball. Hope this clown never gets selected.
 
I for one do prefer international cricket but the sad fact is that T20 leagues represent the best growth for cricket internationally.

However, a concurrent league cycle won't work for cricket due to the different weather conditions in different countries. However, there can and should be cycles where the leagues are played and it makes sense for leagues to be played concurrently in that cycle.

In addition, there must be a cap on the number of leagues one cricketer play. Maybe one home league + another league. I don't know about you guys but as much I enjoyed watching Chris Gayle the novelty soon wears off when he playing for a new team in every month.

In fact this would help strengthen the quality of other leagues such as PSL, BPL etc. Lesser players will play these leagues with more intensity in order to try and get into the big leagues like IPL next season.

Thats a model that works well in football where you have leagues like the Portugese Leagues and Belgium leagues that produce talent or buy in lesser players that develop and ultimately moves on to bigger leagues.

The final solution would be to scrap international T20 completely unless its a world cup every 4 years.
 
Finally somebody who is at peace with the inevitable future. Club cricket is the next big thing for Cricket. Old timers like the people on this board may not like it but that is the exact form of entertainment the massive majority of paying public want to see. Adapt and stay alive or fight and perish. Cricket has 2 choices and I think this guy if elected will make the smart choice.
 
We may not like what Cameron has to say but given below, looks like things are heading that way!

===

Australia's proposed three-match T20 series against India from October 11-17 is set to be put on hold to avoid a clash with a postponed Indian Premier League (IPL) season, which is scheduled to be played in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) from September 19 to November 10.

"With the IPL (happening), it is quite likely that those games [three T20Is vs India] will also likely not proceed, although that is yet to be decided or announced," said a Cricket Australia spokesperson.

There is no official word on the fate of the T20 campaign against India yet but the cancellation of Australia's T20I series at home against West Indies due to Covid-19 earlier on Tuesday means it is only a matter of time before the announcement is made formal.

The summer fixtures against India, a four-match Test series followed by three ODIs, "remain as scheduled".

While the first-ever day-night Border-Gavaskar Test match is slated to be held at the Adelaide Oval, there is speculation that the Boxing Day Test could be moved out of Melbourne if the COVID-19 situation doesn’t improve in Victoria.

Following the end of the Indian Test campaign in Sydney, the two sides meet at the Perth Stadium for the first ODI, followed by matches at the MCG (January 15) and the SCG (January 17).

Meanwhile, Australia's limited-overs tour of England is scheduled to end on September 15, leaving players from both sides just about enough time to get to the UAE for the IPL.

https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cric...020-uae-schedule-covid-19/article32265589.ece
 
Back
Top