What's new

Can Mohammad Amir better Bhuvneshwar Kumar's 2014 Test stats in England?

Coming from someone whose own team has produced only one fast bowler with under 30 average in their entire test cricket history.

It is like Hafeez criticizing batting technique of Vijay.

A country producing players doesn't make the fans automatically knowledgeable. The biggest example is you using Amir's average when everyone knows that average is only because of one single 2010 English season and he averages over 35 in every other series he has played and apart from England he averages 40 everywhere
 
A country producing players doesn't make the fans automatically knowledgeable. The biggest example is you using Amir's average when everyone knows that average is only because of one single 2010 English season and he averages over 35 in every other series he has played and apart from England he averages 40 everywhere

Just like Kumble averaged in high 30s and 40s everywhere except India where he averaged 24? :)
 
Indian fast bowlers should hardly be a benchmark. I think when it comes to Amir, people have put him on a pedestal where he never belonged. Everyone chose to ignore 80% of the disappointments and remembered one amazing series where he got the friendliest of conditions. People who dared to mention his limitations were labelled "haters" instantly, but now they are hitting back. At times these people undermine Amir a little, but it is nothing compared to the hype Amir received.

As for his age then, I don't think I would call it a disadvantage. If you look at recent examples for Asian bowlers (example: Irfan Pathan, Ishant, Junaid Khan), age 18-20 seems to be when they are at their best. I still think its too early to judge Amir, but it is quite clear that in his 17 matches so far, Amir has been way below average in conditions lacking prodigious swing. I would call this a valid criticism.

Thank you for your opinion but I would rather go by the opinion of the likes of Akram and Holding who think that he is a very good bowler.

Of course, he is nowhere near someone like Steyn or Anderson or even Kapil because he still has to take at least 300 wickets to be able to compared to them. However, he is a very good prospect. You can't average 22 in ODIs and T20s and 21 in FC if you are mediocre.
 
No denying that Amir has been quite poor. Very disappointing in a series where every English fast bowler has averaged in the low 20s and the English middle order is the weakest in a decade.
 
Bowling average of 26 shouldn’t be impossible for Amir. Batting average of 27 looks more difficult. He’s getting his second chance to beat Bhuvi though, lets see what happens this time.
 
Bowling average of 26 shouldn’t be impossible for Amir. Batting average of 27 looks more difficult. He’s getting his second chance to beat Bhuvi though, lets see what happens this time.

Pakistan drew the test series, with the help of several world class spells by Amir last time. Remind me how India fared in 2014?
 
Pakistan drew the test series, with the help of several world class spells by Amir last time. Remind me how India fared in 2014?
It was a YK masterclass along with Yasir magic. Nothing much to do with Amir. Please create a separate thread to discuss team performances and stick to comparing individual performances on this thread.

Let me guess, Amir missed a lot of edges, showed a lot of class, looked beautiful bowling with a natural action but still averaged 40+?
 
Pakistan drew the test series, with the help of several world class spells by Amir last time. Remind me how India fared in 2014?
Come up with something logical.
This argument is as wrong as it gets.
Zaheer is a better bowler than shoaib in aus cos he won a match there.
 
Back
Top