What's new

Can Pakistan approach ICJ for deciding Kashmir dispute?

Pakistan can, but india wont attend the first hearing in a court, becoz they will send the letter reminding them that its out of the jurisdiction of ICJ becoz pakistan and india both are common wealth nation, so any issue will be rsolved bilaterally ....
 
Last edited:
Pakistan can, but india wont attend the first hearing in a court, becoz they will send the letter reminding them that its out of the jurisdiction of ICJ becoz pakistan and india both are common wealth nation, so any issue will be rsolved bilaterally ....

Then why did Pakistan attend?
 
Then why did Pakistan attend?

Because this is a violation of Vienna COnvention of 1963 and both India and Pakistan are signatory to it and have accepted the jurisdiction of ICJ in that matter.

Secondly what will Pakistan go and tell ICJ about Kashmir?Does Pakistan have any legal document to say that Kashmir belongs to Pakistan?India has a the signed treaty of accession by the King of Kashmir.
 
Can't expect a corrupt and security threat PM to take decisions in Pakistan's favour. Why was Jindal taken to Murree when the visa he was issued was only for Lahore? What was discussed in the meeting? In which democracy does the sitting PM hold secret meetings with "friends" from enemy nations.
 
Can't expect a corrupt and security threat PM to take decisions in Pakistan's favour. Why was Jindal taken to Murree when the visa he was issued was only for Lahore? What was discussed in the meeting? In which democracy does the sitting PM hold secret meetings with "friends" from enemy nations.


I would have been glad if IK under similar circumstances would have chosen same path.

Didn't want to be recorded. Simple.


Back Door diplomacy.


If we have solid proofs than we should trust ICJ. Even if we don’t want to agree with ICJ than we should execute Jadhav if its our national interests.


If Nawaz Sharif has been chosen by Majority Pakistanis than did we Elect a " Security threat " ?


If He was elected through establishment support and aid than did the establishment backed Security threat for a third time ? If Establishment did not have probably than with whom we have problem ? Establishment or Nawaz Sharif ?


If we want real democracy wrt International affairs/foreign affairs than we will have to give foreign ministry to civial governments completely. Whether its Zardari, Altaf, Sharif, Fazal, Siraj, Aswand or Imran at helm of affairs.


When the Civilians were at helm of affairs what were our achievements ? UN resolution for solving Kashmir Dispute, We raised voice for Palestine and our FM got Jordans highest award for his services to people of Palestine. Our Nuclear Program begun and much much better achievements.


Establishment shouldn't think that only they are Patriots and Civilians are Traitors. Financial Corruption cannot be linked with one being a Security Threat to Pakistan.


We do not want tootleless PM wrt foreign affairs. In real democracies PM's are fully empowered.
 
When you have a pro Indian PM having dinner with Jindal nothing can be done. Our main problem at the moment is getting rid of Nawaz and Zardari.
 
Pakistan should have simply refused to be present at the ICJ. Pretty subservient from the Government there.
 
Jindal was taken to Murry because there was no fear of Bugging. Simple as that.
 
Back
Top