What's new

Character assassination, foreign funding, Tosha Khana, Farah Gogi, Religious Card - What next by PDM

It was always gonna come down to this. Let them have it. Let them enjoy being told they are a third world country while Bangladesh build its own tube service...they will be competing with the taliban in a few years..by the way even if they make him na ehal.he will still be defacto chair man or patron..

But they will win..they always do..until they lose..

Honestly Khan is 70 now... he should rest and enjoy the remainder of his life with his children. No need to work so hard for an ungrateful nation. They can keep electing the next generation of Sharifs and Bhuttos and see how that turns out for them. The dynasties will keep feeding the corrupt generals with more DHAs till Pakistan runs out of land for them. In 1971, the generals told the nation that the independence of Bangladesh is a good thing as East Pakistan was a liability on the West. Today Bangladesh is building underground metros, is doing better economically and is rapidly developing. We on the other hand are going to start competing with Afghanistan soon.
 
TOSHAKHANA CASE: COURT RESERVES VERDICT ON IMRAN KHAN’S EXEMPTION PLEA

An Islamabad district and sessions court on Tuesday reserved its verdict on a petition filed by PTI chairman Imran Khan seeking exemption from personal appearance in the Toshakhana case on health grounds.

Today’s hearing
As the Additional Sessions Judge Zafar Iqbal resumed hearing the case filed by the ECP for criminal proceedings against the former prime minister, the PTI lawyers filed a petition seeking exemption from personal appearance in the Toshakhana case.

The petition was submitted by Khan’s lawyer Gohar Ali Khan and Ali Bukhari.

At the outset of the hearing, Khan’s lawyer Bukhari urged the court to fix next hearing of the case after Feb 15 as PTI chief was scheduled to appear before Judge Rakhshanda Shaheen on that day.

At this, the judge asked Bukhari to provide a final date

“Provide me a date when Imran Khan will appear before court,” the judge told the lawyer.

Bukhari told that said his client would appear before the court once allowed by his doctors.

After hearing the arguments, the court reserved verdict on Mr Khan’s exemption plea.

...
https://arynews.tv/toshakhana-case-court-reserves-verdict-on-imran-khans-exemption-plea/
 
Tyrian White case: IHC to hear petition against Imran today

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) will hear a petition today (Thursday) seeking former prime minister Imran Khan’s disqualification for concealing his alleged daughter Tyrian White in his nomination forms submitted to contest the 2018 general election.

A bench comprising IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Justice Arbab Mohammad Tahir will take up the plea at 12pm today.

Last year, petitioner Sajid Mahmood had approached the court claiming that although Imran made arrangements for Tyrian White’s upkeep abroad, he did not disclose it in nomination papers and affidavits filed by him for elections.

Imran argues petition ‘not maintainable’
In a response submitted on the petition in IHC last week, Imran had requested the court to dismiss the petition saying that it was “not maintainable” on legal grounds.

The PTI chairman had argued that he was not a member of the National Assembly anymore, therefore such a petition was “not maintainable and may not be proceeded (sic)”.

Imran had stated that his resignation from the National Assembly “is irrevocable and he has no intention of taking up a seat in the present National Assembly”.

...
https://www.dawn.com/news/1736185/tyrian-white-case-ihc-to-hear-petition-against-imran-today
 
The Islamabad High Court stressed on Thursday that arguments on the admissibility of the petition seeking former prime minister Imran Khan’s disqualification for concealing his alleged daughter Tyrian White in his nomination forms submitted to contest the 2018 general election were very important.

The observation was made by IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq after a larger bench comprising him, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Justice Arbab Mohammad Tahir took up the plea earlier today.

Last year, petitioner Sajid Mahmood had approached the court claiming that although Imran made arrangements for Tyrian White’s upkeep abroad, he did not disclose it in nomination papers and affidavits filed by him for elections.

Salman Butt was present from the petitioner’s side while Imran’s counsels included Advocate Salman Akram Raja’s assistant and Advocate Salman Abuzar Niazi.
 
PML-N senior vice president Maryam Nawaz on Sunday alleged the judiciary is still “behaving like a facilitator” of PTI chief Imran Khan as he got off scot-free on charges of corruption and misuse of power despite availablility of evidence against him.

“Judiciary is still facilitating him [Imran Khan]. The facility he is still enjoying is not giving a good impression about the judiciary,” Ms Nawaz said while replying to a question, during an interaction with a group of media persons, as to why the government was not arresting Mr Khan despite claiming to have evidence of his involvement in corruption and misuse of authority.

“There are evidences that Imran’s hands are tainted with corruption. He is not appearing before courts and getting dates [of next hearings] again and again. Judiciary is still facilitating him and giving him complete liberty, and it’s raising questions,” she added.

She said Mr Khan was not giving replies about Toshakhana gifts, Tyrian White and prohibited funding to his party, while she and her father PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif had attended over 200 hearings of “baseless corruption cases” based on Panamagate and used to come from Lahore to Islamabad at every hearing.
 
Seems some desperate stuff from PDM

Apparently crowd shouting:

Tyrian k papa chor hai in lahore qalandars vs multan sultan game:

<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 46.563%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/fg3a2c" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>
 
An Islamabad district and sessions court deferred — for a second time — on Tuesday PTI chairman Imran Khan’s indictment in the Toshakhana reference on medical grounds as the judge remarked that if this delay continued, his trial would continue indefinitely.

Additional District and Sessions Judge (ADSJ) Zafar Iqbal has instructed Imran to appear before the court in person on Feb 28.

On Jan 31, the court had announced that charges against the PTI chief — who is recuperating after sustaining a gunshot wound following an assassination attempt during a rally on Nov 3 — would take place in the reference on Feb 7.

However, in the previous hearing, Imran’s lawyers filed an exemption plea for a personal appearance in court, after which the ex-premier’s indictment was delayed to today.

DAWN
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Strongly condemn illegal incarceration, physical abuse & killing of a poor Baloch woman & her children in Khetran, Balochistan in private jail of Sardar Abdul Rehman Khetran, a prov minister. Immediate action must be taken against this law of the jungle.</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/1628311768379301888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 22, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Record of Toshakhana buyers since 2002 being declassified, govt tell LHC

The federal government told the Lahore High Court (LHC) on Thursday that records of the buyers of the Toshakhana gifts since 2002 were being “declassified” and would be uploaded on a website.

After initially expressing reluctance over submitting the records, the government had on Feb 21 submitted details of the Toshakhana gifts to the court during the hearing of a petition seeking to make Toshakhana records public.

It had also said that it was at the LHC’s discretion to unseal the documents.

Established in 1974, the Tosha*khana is a department under the administrative control of the Cabinet Division and stores precious gifts given to rulers, parliamentarians, bureaucrats, and officials by heads of other governments and states and foreign dignitaries.

According to Toshakhana rules, gifts/presents and other such materials received by persons to whom these rules apply shall be reported to the Cabinet Division.

The department has been in the news in recent months in light of proceedings against former prime minister Imran Khan for “not sharing details” of Toshakhana gifts.

The PTI, while in government, had also been reluctant to disclose details of the gifts presented to Imran since he assumed office in 2018, maintaining that doing so would jeopardise international ties, even as the Pakistan Infor*mation Commission (PIC) ordered it to do so.

...
https://www.dawn.com/news/1738707/r...s-since-2002-being-declassified-govt-tell-lhc
 
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday approved Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan’s interim bail in Toshakhana case, ARY News reported.

IHC Chief Justice Amir Farooq heard Imran Khan’s plea and granted interim bail in the case till March 9.

The bail comes hours after a local court in Islamabad issued non-bailable arrest warrant for PTI chief in the Toshakhana case. Additional sessions judge Zafar Iqbal issued the arrest warrant.
 
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday approved Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan’s interim bail in Toshakhana case, ARY News reported.

IHC Chief Justice Amir Farooq heard Imran Khan’s plea and granted interim bail in the case till March 9.

The bail comes hours after a local court in Islamabad issued non-bailable arrest warrant for PTI chief in the Toshakhana case. Additional sessions judge Zafar Iqbal issued the arrest warrant.

If they hadnt I reckon that Court building might not be here today
 
If they hadnt I reckon that Court building might not be here today

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I want to thank our PTI workers for their massive welcome for me in Islamabad today. <a href="https://t.co/VNZ5BFH2Ss">pic.twitter.com/VNZ5BFH2Ss</a></p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/1630575467228024832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 28, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I want to thank our PTI workers for their massive welcome for me in Islamabad today. <a href="https://t.co/VNZ5BFH2Ss">pic.twitter.com/VNZ5BFH2Ss</a></p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/1630575467228024832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 28, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Massive crowd..yet bhagora claims he is still their King..
 
An Islamabad sessions court hearing the Toshakhana case against PTI chief Imran Khan issued on Tuesday non-bailable arrest warrants for him over persistent absences.

Just hours before, he secured bail in two other cases — pertaining to prohibited funding and terrorism — as he appeared before as many courts at Islamabad’s judicial complex accompanied by a large number of party workers.

The PTI chief was required to appear in person in four different cases in courts in Islamabad today:

Prohibited funding — banking court located at judicial complex
Terrorism — anti-terrorism court at the same judicial complex
Toshakhana — in sessions court in F-8 Kachehri
Attempted murder case at the same sessions court
 
An Islamabad sessions court hearing the Toshakhana case against PTI chief Imran Khan issued on Tuesday non-bailable arrest warrants for him over persistent absences.

Just hours before, he secured bail in two other cases — pertaining to prohibited funding and terrorism — as he appeared before as many courts at Islamabad’s judicial complex accompanied by a large number of party workers.

The PTI chief was required to appear in person in four different cases in courts in Islamabad today:

Prohibited funding — banking court located at judicial complex
Terrorism — anti-terrorism court at the same judicial complex
Toshakhana — in sessions court in F-8 Kachehri
Attempted murder case at the same sessions court

Amongst the other charges from the Junta-Jay walking in Lahore, keeping a dog without a licence, being fitter than Billo even though he is half his age, being loved by the PK public.
 
Amongst the other charges from the Junta-Jay walking in Lahore, keeping a dog without a licence, being fitter than Billo even though he is half his age, being loved by the PK public.

Did you see the press conference of Imran Khan with Usman Dar and Javed Ali (school chowkidar)?

Apparently, the imported haram khors stripped, physically tortured, and abused Javed and his wife to blackmail him into lying and falsely accusing Usman Dar.

Meanwhile, convicted criminal nani of the haram khors copied WWE wrestler Nikki Bella's logo on twitter to portray herself as ''fearless''.
 
SECTION 144 IMPOSED IN SURROUNDINGS OF ISLAMABAD COURTS

Islamabad administration on Thursday slapped section 144 near the courts located in the federal capital, amid security concerns, ARY News reported.

As per the spokesperson of the Islamabad Capital Police, the protests near the courts situated in the federal capital have been banned and only concerned lawyers and journalists will be allowed to visit the courts.

The step has been taken in the wake of security threats and the people have been advised to call 15 Pukaar helpline if they witness any suspicious activity in Islamabad.

Earlier, the Islamabad police registered another case against Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman Imran Khan and other party leaders for attacking, vandalising, and damaging the judicial complex.

A case was registered against the PTI leaders and dozens of workers under Section 353/7 of the ATA and other provisions.

According to the FIR, the leaders of a “political party” were leading the mob, adding that they provoked the people, which led to vandalism.

An attempt was made to attack the Federal Judicial Complex and the Islamabad High Court (IHC) under a plan, it said.

ARY
 
Did you see the press conference of Imran Khan with Usman Dar and Javed Ali (school chowkidar)?

Apparently, the imported haram khors stripped, physically tortured, and abused Javed and his wife to blackmail him into lying and falsely accusing Usman Dar.

Meanwhile, convicted criminal nani of the haram khors copied WWE wrestler Nikki Bella's logo on twitter to portray herself as ''fearless''.

I did, disgusting imports with no morals or humanity and no support at all.
 
IK is made of solid stuff - yeh becharay and their feeble attempts to subjugate him - wont work
 
76 fake cases filed as of yesterday against Imran Khan by imported traitors.

The state funds being wasted on this political vendetta by election fearing cowards are not being questioned by anyone in the banana republic.
 
Counsel concedes Imran surrendered guardian rights for Tyrian

counsel for PTI chief Imran Khan has conceded the veracity of an affidavit Mr Khan submitted before a court in California stating that he had surrendered the guardian rights of his alleged daughter Tyrian Jade White Khan.

Salman Akram Raja, the counsel, admitted before a three-member larger bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday that “Mr Khan never denied, nor disowned the affidavit”.

The bench had taken up a petition seeking disqualification of Imran Khan for concealing his alleged daughter.

The bench comprised Chief Justice Aamer Farooq, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir.

The affidavit was submitted by Mr Khan to the Superior Court of California in response to a notice issued to him on a suit filed by Tyrian’s aunt, who sought her custody.

...
https://www.dawn.com/news/1743538/counsel-concedes-imran-surrendered-guardian-rights-for-tyrian
 
Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Mariyum Aurangzeb on Wednesday strongly condemned former US special envoy for Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad’s tweet in favour of former premier Imran Khan.

In a statement, the information minister said, “Jewish lobby had come forward to save its stooge and handlers of the criminal involved in foreign funding were coming to light.”

Mariyum Aurangzeb said the foreign stooge was responsible for the financial, political and diplomatic disaster in Pakistan.

She said that the foreign puppet had committed the worst human rights abuses during his four years rule, adding that Imran had been labelled a media predator at international level.

The information minister alleged that international lobbyists had mobilized to create a civil war in Pakistan and Zalmay’s tweet was a link to that plan.

The statement comes after Khalilzad had warned that the arrest of former prime minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman will deepen the crises being faced by the country.
 
Khalilzad urges civil-military leadership to change ‘disastrous’ course
This was ex-US diplomat’s third statement in a week on brewing political tensions in Pakistan

Despite the Foreign Office rejoinder, former US diplomat Zalmay Khalilzad continued to dwell on the current political situation in Pakistan as on Thursday he came up with another statement urging the country's civil and military leadership to change the "disastrous" course.

In a message on Twitter greeting Muslims around the world on the start of Ramazan, Khalilzad used the occasion to ask Islamic countries to reflect upon in the holy month.

"In Pakistan, civil and military leaders might ponder the state of their country and the disastrous course it is on. In respect for their obligations and in the interest of their people, they should change course," he wrote.

...
https://tribune.com.pk/story/240773...litary-leadership-to-change-disastrous-course
 
PTI supporters hold on to the theory that the US forced GHQ to topple Imran Khan. Then why would someone like Zalmay Khalilzad speak in favor of IK and against the GHQ?
 
PTI supporters hold on to the theory that the US forced GHQ to topple Imran Khan. Then why would someone like Zalmay Khalilzad speak in favor of IK and against the GHQ?

I think they have realised that what they thought was an easy win, because what Bajwa and Haqqani told them, has turned into a disaster. Its not just us, British Diplomats also think so. Regime change has turned 90% of PKs even more anti American than they already were. The Cypher was real and Regime is a fact.
 
Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Mariyum Aurangzeb on Wednesday strongly condemned former US special envoy for Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad’s tweet in favour of former premier Imran Khan.

In a statement, the information minister said, “Jewish lobby had come forward to save its stooge and handlers of the criminal involved in foreign funding were coming to light.”

Mariyum Aurangzeb said the foreign stooge was responsible for the financial, political and diplomatic disaster in Pakistan.

She said that the foreign puppet had committed the worst human rights abuses during his four years rule, adding that Imran had been labelled a media predator at international level.

The information minister alleged that international lobbyists had mobilized to create a civil war in Pakistan and Zalmay’s tweet was a link to that plan.

The statement comes after Khalilzad had warned that the arrest of former prime minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman will deepen the crises being faced by the country.

The pumpkin faced wind bag is criticising a call for an election. Idiot
 
US DISTANCES ITSELF FROM ZALMAY KHALILZAD’S STATEMENTS ABOUT PAKISTAN

Principal Deputy Spokesperson at US Department of State Vedant Patel said Tuesday that the United States has nothing to do with Zalmay Khalilzad’s statements about the political situation in Pakistan.

At a press conference in Washington, Vedant Patel said Zalmay Khalilzad’s statement has nothing to do with our American foreign policy and his statements are in his personal capacity.

“Zalmay Khalilzad’s statement did not represent the Biden administration, his statement had nothing to do with American foreign policy.”

He said that violence, harassment, or threats do not interfere in politics, we encourage political parties to respect the law.

...
https://arynews.tv/us-distances-zalmay-khalilzads-statements-about-pakistan/
 
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday reserved its verdict on the admissibility of a petition seeking the disqualification of PTI Chairman Imran Khan for concealing his alleged daughter, Tyrian White from his election papers.

Last year, petitioner Muhammad Sajid had filed a plea in the IHC claiming that although Imran made arrangements for Tyrian White’s upkeep in the United Kingdom, he did not disclose it in nomination papers and affidavits filed by him for contesting elections.

Submitting his response to the IHC, the former premier on Feb 1 had requested the court to dismiss the petition, saying that it was “not maintainable” on legal grounds as he was no longer a lawmaker.

Subsequently, the IHC had decided to constitute a larger bench to hear the petition. On Feb 9, it had emphasised that arguments on the plea’s admissibility were highly important.
 
Bushra Bibi, the wife of former prime minister Imran Khan has challenged the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) call-up notices in Islamabad High Court (IHC) in the Toshakhana case, ARY News reported on Saturday.

As per details, the plea was filed in Islamabad High Court by Khawaja Haris on behalf of Bushra Bibi and chairman NAB and Additional Director NAB were made respondents in the plea.

The plea stated that the court should declare the NAB call-up notices on February 17 and March 16, illegal and the inquiry should be barred from making changes in the investigation till the final verdict.
 
Imran’s Nikah case hearing on 8th
Mufti Saeed has said that he solemnised the ceremony in January 2018

The case of former prime minister Imran Khan’s Nikah with Bushra Bibi during her Iddat period will be heard by Judicial Magistrate Nasar Minallah on April 8, 2023.

Mufti Saeed Khan, in his statement in court on January 18, 2023, said that he had solemnised the ceremony in January 2018 with the permission of Bushra Bibi and some of the other women in her family.

He said the first Nikah was annulled because it was solemnized during Bushra Bibi’s Iddat period. However, Saeed said he was unaware of this and had found out later.

He called Imran and Bushra after one month and solemnised the Nikah again according to Islamic teachings in Defence Society, Lahore, with Aun Chaudhry and Zulfi Bukhari as witnesses after he had declared the first Nikah null and void. Thus, Imran Khan’s Nikah with Bushra Bibi was solemnised twice.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/1057824-imran-s-nikah-case-hearing-on-8th
 
Imran’s Nikah case hearing on 8th
Mufti Saeed has said that he solemnised the ceremony in January 2018

The case of former prime minister Imran Khan’s Nikah with Bushra Bibi during her Iddat period will be heard by Judicial Magistrate Nasar Minallah on April 8, 2023.

Mufti Saeed Khan, in his statement in court on January 18, 2023, said that he had solemnised the ceremony in January 2018 with the permission of Bushra Bibi and some of the other women in her family.

He said the first Nikah was annulled because it was solemnized during Bushra Bibi’s Iddat period. However, Saeed said he was unaware of this and had found out later.

He called Imran and Bushra after one month and solemnised the Nikah again according to Islamic teachings in Defence Society, Lahore, with Aun Chaudhry and Zulfi Bukhari as witnesses after he had declared the first Nikah null and void. Thus, Imran Khan’s Nikah with Bushra Bibi was solemnised twice.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/1057824-imran-s-nikah-case-hearing-on-8th

How unfortunate is IK. His political rivals are immoral sleazebags who have no principles. They stoop lower and lower everyday
 
TOSHAKHANA CASE: COURT DISMISSES ECP’S PLEA FOR EARLY HEARING

Islamabad district and sessions court on Tuesday dismissed a plea for immediate hearing of the Toshakhana case against the former prime minister and PTI chief Imran Khan, ARY News reported.

The plea was moved by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) in the court of additional sessions judge Zafar Iqbal.

The former prime minister was asked to appear before the court at 8:30 in the morning, but he did not appear. At the outset of the hearing, Imran Khan’s lawyers Khawaja Haris and Faisal Chaudhry opposed the immediate hearing of the case and termed it as a waste of money and time.

On the last hearing, the court ordered to hear the case on April 29, then what is the need of an immediate hearing, he asked.

Haris said they were preparing for the case as per the scheduled hearing on April 29 and added whoever has filed plea against Imran Khan wants to ‘target’ him.

...
https://arynews.tv/toshakhana-case-court-dismisses-ecps-plea-for-early-hearing/
 
An Islamabad district and sessions court on Tuesday rejected the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) request for an early hearing in the Toshakhana criminal proceedings after listening to the arguments of all the parties.

At the outset of the hearing presided over by additional sessions judge Zafar Iqbal, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawyer Khawaja Haris questioned the justification for an early hearing, saying that it “wasted money”.

PTI lawyer Faisal Chaudhry continued that the April 29 date for the hearing was already accepted by the ECP and asked why they needed the date to be changed after two days. To this, the ECP lawyer Amjad Pervaiz said that the commission had asked for two days, not an entire month before the case was heard.

While presenting his arguments, Haris said that the case against PTI chief Imran Khan was filed by the district election commissioner and the ECP had also filed a private complaint against Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) leader Ali Haider Gillani.
 
The country’s top accountability watchdog has told the Islamabad High Court (IHC) that former premier Imran Khan is not cooperating in its ongoing inquiry into the Toshakhana–gift repository—case.

“[Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf chief] Imran Khan has been sent a questionnaire and details of gifts he received [from foreign dignitaries during his term as the prime minister], but he is deliberately avoiding the investigation,” NAB Deputy Prosecutor General Sardar Muzaffar Abbasi told the court on Thursday.

A single-judge bench comprising IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq was hearing Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi’s petitions against NAB inquiry into the Toshakhana case.

Imran Khan approached the IHC against NAB’s Toshakhana inquiry on March 30. The former first lady on April 1 also challenged the notices issued by NAB to her on February 16 and 17 and requested the court to declare them illegal.

She also requested the court to stop NAB from turning the inquiry into an investigation until a decision is taken on her application.

On April 3, the IHC issued notices to NAB seeking replies over its inquiry into the Toshakhana case.

On Thursday, NAB told the court that it had issued notices related to Toshakhana gifts to all former cabinet members and not just Imran Khan. NAB Deputy Prosecutor General Sardar Muzaffar Abbasi told the court that the PTI chief was not cooperating in the investigation.

IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq noted that if the notices had been served in accordance with the rules, this situation could have been avoided. He emphasised the need for NAB to follow the law and rules when issuing notices, stating that accused individuals have the right to defend themselves.

The chief justice asked NAB to send a new notice to the Imran and his wife after fulfilling all the rules

He questioned if NAB had any evidence or the case was solely based on newspaper reports. The court later adjourned the case till April 27 after directing NAB to submit a written reply within seven days.

NAB on November 8, 2022 opened an inquiry against Imran Khan into alleged violation of the Toshakhana rules by the former premier. NAB came into action a month after the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) disqualified the PTI chief as a lawmaker.

The ECP had ruled that Imran had bought gifts given by foreign dignitaries from the state gift depository but did not disclose the assets in declarations submitted to the commission.
 
Imran’s Nikah case hearing on 8th
Mufti Saeed has said that he solemnised the ceremony in January 2018

The case of former prime minister Imran Khan’s Nikah with Bushra Bibi during her Iddat period will be heard by Judicial Magistrate Nasar Minallah on April 8, 2023.

Mufti Saeed Khan, in his statement in court on January 18, 2023, said that he had solemnised the ceremony in January 2018 with the permission of Bushra Bibi and some of the other women in her family.

He said the first Nikah was annulled because it was solemnized during Bushra Bibi’s Iddat period. However, Saeed said he was unaware of this and had found out later.

He called Imran and Bushra after one month and solemnised the Nikah again according to Islamic teachings in Defence Society, Lahore, with Aun Chaudhry and Zulfi Bukhari as witnesses after he had declared the first Nikah null and void. Thus, Imran Khan’s Nikah with Bushra Bibi was solemnised twice.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/1057824-imran-s-nikah-case-hearing-on-8th

Yeah won’t be surprised if this is the case. But to his followers he is in fallible.
 
The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Thursday dismissed a petition filed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan's wife Bushra Bibi that sought to "halt expected police action" at their Zaman Park residence during Eidul Fitr holidays.

The court also imposed a fine of Rs100,000 on Bushra's lawyer Azhar Siddique.

The Punjab police had raided Imran's Lahore residence last month after the former premier left for the Federal Judicial Complex for a hearing and arrested several party workers.

During the hearing of a separate case at the LHC earlier this week, Imran informed the court of his fears that another "operation" would be launched during the Eid holidays. Subsequently, the court directed police to not "harass" Imran.

During the hearing, Bushra nominated the Ministry of Interior, inspector general Punjab police and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) as respondents in the petition. It stated that "reports" had been received that an operation would be conducted at Zaman Park during the Eid holidays.

Express Tribune
 
Bushra Bibi, the former first lady and wife of ex-prime minister Imran Khan, has warned caretaker Punjab Chief Minister Mohsin Naqvi and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif that their offices will be responsible if an operation is carried out at the Zaman Park residence during the Eidul Fitr holidays.
 
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has disposed of petitions filed by former prime minister Imran Khan and his wife against an inquiry initiated by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) into a gift repository—Toshakhana—case, noting that it cannot stop NAB from probing the matter.

When a division bench, consisting of Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Babar Sattar, on Wednesday resumed hearing of the petitions challenging the call-up notices issued by the top graft buster, NAB prosecution team requested the court to reject Imran and his wife Bushra Bibi’s petitions.

The top accountability watchdog also submitted a written reply.

It said Imran Khan during his term as the prime minister received around 108 gifts from foreign dignitaries. The former premier kept 58 of these gifts whose value was around Rs142,123,100 but Imran paid only Rs38,077,050 for these items.

It said NAB initiated an inquiry into this alleged misuse of the Toshakhana and sent calls-up notices along with questionnaires to seek information from the petitioner strictly in accordance with the law.

“[However], the petitioner instead of replying to the questionnaire annexed with the 1st call-up notice, submitted an evasive reply…The said reply cannot be termed to be a reply to the questions asked by the petitioner. Therefore, in the interest of justice, a 2nd call-up notice was issued.”

It said the contentions of the petitioner were based on surmises and conjectures, and that NAB will carry out the inquiry within the mandate of law. All the actions will be taken strictly in accordance with law.

Justice Aamer Farooq asked NAB to issue notices to the petitioner in the light of the judgments of the Supreme Court and according to the law. The bench later disposed of the petitions noting that it cannot stop the graft buster from carrying out an inquiry.

NAB can also take action against the petitioners [Imran Khan and his wife] as per law if they do not cooperate with it during its inquiry, the court observed.

On July 7, 2022, NAB Executive Board Meeting (EBM) decided to authorize an Inquiry into alleged misuse of authority and criminal breach of trust by the former prime minister, who, it claimed, illegally sold gifts presented by foreign dignitaries.

NAB Rawalpindi later authorized the inquiry on August 5, 2022 and sent call-up notices and questionnaires to Imran and his wife.

Imran Khan approached the IHC against these notices on March 30. The former first lady on April 1 also challenged the notices issued by NAB to her on February 17 and March 16 and requested the court to declare them illegal. She also requested the court to stop NAB from turning the inquiry into an investigation until a decision is taken on her application.

In October 2022, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) also disqualified the PTI chief as a lawmaker, ruling that Imran had bought gifts given by foreign dignitaries from the state gift depository but did not disclose the assets in declarations submitted to the commission.

Express Tribune
 
Bushra Bibi, the wife of former prime minister Imran Khan, has decided to lodge a criminal case against Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N) Senior Vice President Maryam Nawaz for defamation, Pakistan Tehkreek-e-Insaf (PTI) senior leader Fawad Chaudhry said.

Maryam has accused the former first lady of receiving bribes, including a diamond set in return for using her influence during the tenure of the PTI government.

The PML-N leader had alleged that Farah Gogi, a close friend of Bushra Bibi, remained actively involved in running the day-to-day affairs of Usman Buzdar-led Punjab government and would also receive bribe for official transfer and postings of the officials.

While addressing a news conference here on Tuesday, Fawad said Maryam alleged that Bushra Bibi was taking bribes for getting official documents signed by the authorities during the previous PTI-led government.

“She has never participated in any political activity. She was only visited shelter homes,” he remarked.
Maryam continued to hurl allegations against her despite the fact that she “is apolitical person”.

“Therefore, Bushra Bibi has decided to send a legal notice to Maryam Nawaz for levelling baseless allegations,” he said. “The notice will be followed by the filing of a criminal case.”

Firing a broadside at the chief election commissioner, Fawad said, “Sikandar Sultan Raja is a cohort of the incumbent government.”

The PTI leader said that one the one hand, they say that there was no money for conducting elections, while on the other, they “purchased a four-kanal land worth more than Rs300 million for the Election Commission of Pakistan office in Sargodha”.

Fawad said Senator Ejaz Chaudhry had filed a reference against the CEC but no action was taken, adding that the PTI would be sending a new reference against Raja.
 
Bushra Bibi, the wife of ex-prime minister and PTI Chairman Imran Khan, served a legal notice to PML-N Chief Organiser Maryam Nawaz on Thursday for hurling “defamatory, false, frivolous and slanderous” accusations against the former during a recent public speech.

The notice, sent through Advocate Fareed, mentions a speech given by Maryam on May 1 at a PML-N convention in Lahore.

The notice said the PML-N leader had accused Bushra Bibi of taking “five-caret gold rings as bribes for getting documents signed by authorities” during her address.

The notice, a copy of which is available with Dawn.com, said that Maryam’s statement was part of a “vilification campaign” aimed to “harm, defame and denigrate” Bushra Bibi and her family with “criminal object to benefit the political opponents of the client’s husband Mr Imran Khan Niazi”.
 
Imran, Bushra Bibi's NAB notices in Toshakhana case illegal: IHC
High court says bureau can issue new notice after fulfilling all requirements of law

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) declared illegal on Saturday the call-up notices issued by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi in the Toshakhana case.

The court ruled that the notices “are not in accordance with the law, therefore they have no legal status”.

IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Babar Sattar issued a detailed seven-page decision that stated that the bureau, according to the NAB amendment, has to state in the notice whether it is summoning the former prime minister and his wife as an accused or in any other capacity.

“While sending notices to Imran and Bushra Bibi, Section 19E of the NAB amendment was not fully implemented,” the IHC observed.

The court added that if the person is an accused, he should be informed of the charges so that he can present his defence.

The IHC further maintained that the accountability bureau can issue a new notice after fulfilling all the requirements of the law.

“This amendment of NAB shows that it was done to fulfill the requirements of Article 10A fair trial,” noted the IHC.

In April, the former first lady had challenged the notices issued by the NAB and requested the court to declare the notices from February 16 and 17 as illegal.

She had requested that the NAB inquiry be stopped from being converted into an investigation until a decision is taken on the application in which NAB has also been made a party.

“Until a decision is taken on the application, NAB should be ordered to stop taking disciplinary action against me,” requested Bushra Bibi.

Express Tribune
 
Toshakhana case: NAB summons PTI chairman on June 21

The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) has summoned Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman once again on June 21 for an inquiry into the Toshakhana case, ARY News reported on Saturday.

The anti-graft watchdog has summoned the PTI chief in connection with an ongoing inquiry regarding misuse of authority, criminal breach of trust, and illegal gain in selling gifted state assets.

The NAB has asked the former prime minister to appear before Combined Investigation Team (CIT) at 11:00 on June 21 for the recording of his statement.

In the fresh summons, the ex-PM has been asked to bring relevant records, including details and records of received state gifts, and records of sold state gifts and physically produce the state gifts retained.

It was alleged that he had subsequently abused his position by retaining the gifted assets worth millions of rupees.

Toshakhana reference
The reference, which alleges that former PM failed to share details of the gifts he retained from the Toshaskhana (during his time as the prime minister) was filed by lawmakers from the ruling coalition last year.

The Toshakhana issue became a major sticking point in national politics after the Election Commission of Pakistan disqualified the PTI chief for making “false statements and incorrect declaration” last month.

...
https://arynews.tv/toshakhana-case-nab-summons-pti-chairman-on-june-21/
 

Farah Gogi’s wealth witnessed ‘staggering rise’ during 2017-20​

Farhat Shahzadi, also known as Farah Gogi and purportedly associated with former prime minister Imran Khan, and a close friend of former first lady Bushra Bibi, has reportedly witnessed a significant surge in her assets from 2017 to 2020, according to a report by Express News.

In 2020, Farah declared assets worth Rs950 million, but her undisclosed assets amounted to a staggering Rs3.82 billion. During these three years, her visible assets increased by 420%, while her undisclosed assets saw an astounding surge of 15,300%.

It's important to note that these assets are in her personal ownership and separate from those of her husband, Ahsan Jamil Gujjar, and other relatives or stakeholders, according to the report.

According to records from the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), Farah holds shares in several companies, including Gousiya Builders (SMC Private Limited), Al Baraq Housing Private Limited, Al Baraq Foods Private Limited, among others.

Records also reveal that on December 3, 2019, the UK's National Crime Agency returned £190 million to the PTI government under an out-of-court settlement with a renowned property tycoon. Allegedly, in exchange for this, Farah was granted 240 kanals of land in the housing scheme of the property tycoon, which is suspected to have been a bribe. In return, the PTI government reportedly refrained from pursuing a case amounting to Rs460 billion.

It is further alleged that with the assistance of Imran Khan, Farah benefitted from the tax amnesty scheme announced by the PTI government in 2018. "Black money" worth over Rs489 million, purportedly obtained as bribes for various postings, transfers, and government contracts, was regularised through the scheme.

In addition to these allegations, Farah, a friend of the former first lady, is also implicated in money laundering, adding another layer to the ongoing investigation.

The corruption allegations appear to extend beyond Pakistan, as Farah and her husband are said to have served as directors at Gold Star Euro Private Limited, posing as doctors.

The investigation has revealed that the number of her bank accounts in Pakistan increased from 2019 to 2021, with one account seeing Rs426 million deposited over four years. Investigators claim to have traced 102 bank accounts linked to Farah, her husband Gujjar, and their business partners, totaling over Rs14 billion.

Meanwhile, PML-N leader Attaullah Tarar, addressing the media at the party's secretariat in Lahore's Model Town, has alleged that Farah and her husband, in collaboration with Bushra Bibi, played a significant role in the PTI government's operations. He claimed that rates for contracts and transfers were fixed during the PTI government's tenure and accused Imran Khan of introducing the tax amnesty scheme to legitimise Farah's "black money".

Tarar further alleged that Usman Buzdar was appointed Punjab chief minister not because of a lack of electricity at his residence but due to his association with Farah, who, in turn, was connected to Bushra. Tarar claimed that together, they transformed Buzdar into a figurehead chief minister, asserting, "I respect Usman Buzdar, but he deviated from the standards set by Shehbaz Sharif in Punjab."

Tarar revealed that when it became evident that a vote of no-confidence against Imran Khan was likely to succeed, the PTI chairman sent Farah Gogi and her husband abroad.

While acknowledging societal concerns about the imprisonment of women, Tarar insisted that considering the evidence, Bushra Bibi should face legal action. He also called for the NAB to conclude cases against Usman Buzdar, emphasising that he should be held accountable as well.

Source: The Express Tribune
 
It looks certain that lots of corruption happened during the PTI regime but I don't think these kind of news are going to damage Imran Khan's vote bank a great deal. Imran Khan supporters are still going to support him.
 
It looks certain that lots of corruption happened during the PTI regime but I don't think these kind of news are going to damage Imran Khan's vote bank a great deal. Imran Khan supporters are still going to support him.
It is inevitable that in a corrupt society that there would have been corruption in the PTI led govt but the question is whether IK sanctioned any of it or benefited from it. Well after nearly 2 years of searching nothing, absolutely nothing. The only thing they could find was Toshakhana and in the end that case had about much legs as NSs courage and morals- none.
On the other hand, not only are his accusers corrupt, they claim Corruption is their right and they needed NROs to avoid life in Jail.
 

Farah Gogi used to travel on ‘secret’ foreign passport to ‘launder illicit money’​

Farhat Shahzadi, alias Farah Gogi — reportedly a front person of former prime minister Imran Khan — used to travel abroad on a "secret" foreign passport to launder the “looted” wealth of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman and his wife, Bushra Bibi, revealed sources close to the investigation agency on Sunday.

In March, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) had registered a money-laundering and kickbacks case against Gogi. The investigation agency had registered a case of Rs849 million against her after the Anti-Corruption Establishment (ACE) referred the inquiry to the investigation.

It said the Financial Monitoring Unit had reported massive, unusual credit transactions in the accounts of Farah, which were estimated to be worth Rs848.95 million.

New disclosures about the alleged mega corruption of Gogi — who is a close friend of the former first lady — show her declared and non-declared assets to have grown by a staggering Rs4,520 million from 2017 to 2020 when the Khan-led party was in power. Her bank accounts are stacked with over Rs14 billion, revealed government sources this week.

Meanwhile, Gogi sent a legal notice to the NAB chairman, FIA DG, Punjab IG and Anti-Corruption Department (ACE) DG on the issue of leaking her property details.

According to the fresh reports, Gogi used to travel abroad on the passport of Vanuatu — a string of more than 80 islands once known as the New Hebrides and it is situated in the southwestern Pacific Ocean — to launder the illicit money.

The sources also claimed that the son of a property tycoon had been given the task of arranging a secret international passport for Gogi. The property tycoon’s son paid $130,000 to a renowned trader to obtain the passport.

On March 28, 2022, the secret passport was handed over to Gogi, the sources added.

In order to get her escape from accountability, Gogi was sent abroad on a Pakistani passport just six days before the Khan-led government was toppled.

In a bid to dodge the investigation agencies, she travelled abroad on a foreign passport, except Dubai.

Source: Geo News
 

Farah Gogi used to travel on ‘secret’ foreign passport to ‘launder illicit money’​

Farhat Shahzadi, alias Farah Gogi — reportedly a front person of former prime minister Imran Khan — used to travel abroad on a "secret" foreign passport to launder the “looted” wealth of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman and his wife, Bushra Bibi, revealed sources close to the investigation agency on Sunday.

In March, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) had registered a money-laundering and kickbacks case against Gogi. The investigation agency had registered a case of Rs849 million against her after the Anti-Corruption Establishment (ACE) referred the inquiry to the investigation.

It said the Financial Monitoring Unit had reported massive, unusual credit transactions in the accounts of Farah, which were estimated to be worth Rs848.95 million.

New disclosures about the alleged mega corruption of Gogi — who is a close friend of the former first lady — show her declared and non-declared assets to have grown by a staggering Rs4,520 million from 2017 to 2020 when the Khan-led party was in power. Her bank accounts are stacked with over Rs14 billion, revealed government sources this week.

Meanwhile, Gogi sent a legal notice to the NAB chairman, FIA DG, Punjab IG and Anti-Corruption Department (ACE) DG on the issue of leaking her property details.

According to the fresh reports, Gogi used to travel abroad on the passport of Vanuatu — a string of more than 80 islands once known as the New Hebrides and it is situated in the southwestern Pacific Ocean — to launder the illicit money.

The sources also claimed that the son of a property tycoon had been given the task of arranging a secret international passport for Gogi. The property tycoon’s son paid $130,000 to a renowned trader to obtain the passport.

On March 28, 2022, the secret passport was handed over to Gogi, the sources added.

In order to get her escape from accountability, Gogi was sent abroad on a Pakistani passport just six days before the Khan-led government was toppled.

In a bid to dodge the investigation agencies, she travelled abroad on a foreign passport, except Dubai.

Source: Geo News
So after 18 months they come up with another attack on IK after all else failed. Rather than make these allegations, come up with cases and prosecutions. And BTW if she had a secret passport, Bajwa would have had her jailed.
 
A legal confrontation has emerged between Farhat Shahzadi, also known as Farah Gogi, a close friend of PTI Chairman Imran Khan's wife, Bushra Bibi, and prominent PML-N leader Attaullah Tarar with the former dispatching a legal notice amounting to Rs5 billion to the latter, alleging unfounded and fabricated accusations made during a recent press conference.

In the legal notice, Gogi has challenged the claims made by Tarar, asserting that all her assets have been duly declared in her tax returns, Express News reported.

She demanded a public apology from Tarar within seven days, warning that failure to comply would result in defamation proceedings and a claim for damages amounting to Rs5 billion.

Gogi is prepared to pursue both criminal and civil cases against Tarar for disseminating false and misleading information.

This development follows a recent report claiming that Shahzadi's disclosed assets rose by Rs4.52 billion from 2017 to 2020. According to Express News, Gogi admitted owning assets worth Rs950 million in 2020, with her declared assets growing by 420% during the PTI government's tenure. The report alleges undeclared assets worth Rs3.82 billion.

The report further implicated Gogi in a land transaction, claiming that she received 240 kanals of land as a bribe, linked to an out-of-court settlement with a property tycoon in the UK in 2019. It also alleged that Gogi took advantage of the 2018 tax amnesty scheme, regularising Rs489 million in black money collected through bribes.

Ataullah Tarar, during a press conference in Lahore last week, revealed shocking details about Gogi's assets, alleging a trio consisting of Farah Gogi, Bushra Bibi, and former Punjab CM Usman Buzdar were behind corruption.

Reacting to Tarar's claims, Imran Khan's lawyer Sher Afzal Marwat had dismissed them as a new wave of propaganda against Bushra Bibi.

Marwat had urged PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif to declare that Pakistan cannot afford further political unrest, emphasising the need for stability in the current circumstances.

Source: Express Tribune

 

Imran's 'un-Islamic' marriage tied to prime ministerial 'prophecy’: witnesses​

In an ongoing legal saga concerning the marriage between Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi, two key witnesses provided statements on Tuesday, shedding light on the alleged 'un-Islamic' nature of the union.

The hearing, initiated in response to Khawar Maneka's request in Islamabad's civil court, featured Mufti Saeed and Aun Chaudhry, both deeming the marriage as un-Islamic and illegal, Express News reported.

District and Sessions Judge Qudratullah presided over the proceedings, prompted by a plea filed by Khawar Farid Maneka, Bushra Bibi's ex-husband. Raja Rizwan Abbasi, Khawar Maneka's lawyer, was also present during the hearing.

Mufti Saeed, taking an oath, revealed that Imran Khan approached him on January 1, 2018, expressing a desire to conduct the nikkah ceremony with Bushra Bibi in Lahore. After verifying legal requirements with Bushra Bibi's supposed sister, Mufti Saeed claimed to have performed the marriage, and the couple began residing in their Bani Gala home. Subsequently, in February 2018, Imran Khan allegedly sought a second nikkah, admitting that the initial marriage occurred during the iddat period, he added.

Mufti Saeed disclosed that Bushra Bibi and her friends asserted she had obtained a divorce from Khawar Maneka in November 2017. He claimed that both parties were aware of the marriage's un-Islamic nature, intentionally sidestepping legal requirements.

Responding to the court's queries, Mufti Saeed explained the significance of the waiting period in Islam, emphasising its role in providing an opportunity for reconciliation and determining potential pregnancy.

Aun Chaudhry, the second witness and Imran Khan's political and private secretary, recounted events leading to the marriages. Imran Khan's divorce from Reham Khan in November 2015, based on Bushra Bibi's suggestion, was reportedly communicated via email, he told the court.

Aun Chaudhry detailed Imran Khan's troubled marital state, leading to visits to Bushra Bibi for 'spiritual solace’ back in 2015. He said that he himself accompanied Imran on these frequent visits.

In December 2017, Imran instructed him to arrange the marriage, stating that Bushra Bibi had obtained a divorce. The ceremony, officiated by Mufti Saeed, took place in Lahore's Defence neighbourhood on January 1, 2018. Aun Chaudhry mentioned media scrutiny over the waiting period, with Imran Khan suggesting maintaining silence until a second marriage after its completion.

According to Aun Chaudhry, the second marriage occurred in Bani Gala in February 2018, with recordings available. Both he and Zulfi Bukhari witnessed the ceremony, and Imran Khan allegedly claimed that marrying Bushra Bibi would lead him to become the prime minister.

The court adjourned the hearing until December 2, with the upcoming testimony of the third witness, Muhammad Latif.

Source: The Express Tribune
 
It seems, all his rivals are trying to put Imran Khan out of the elections at any cost. They don't wanna compete with him because they probably know that they won't be able to beat him in fair and free elections.
 

NAB files graft reference against Imran, Bushra in Toshakhana case​

In a significant development on Tuesday, the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) filed a reference with the accountability court against former prime minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, in connection to the Toshakhana case.

The registrar office of the accountability court is set to take further action after scrutinising the case.

The NAB Rawalpindi, acting on allegations of graft, has named only two accused in the reference – Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi.

The NAB prosecutor, Sohail Arif, along with Investigation Officer Mohsin Haroon, submitted the reference to the registrar office for further legal proceedings.

This development comes after the accountability court on Saturday rejected NAB's request for an extended physical remand of Khan in the Toshakhana case. The court, dismissing the bureau's plea, declared a 21-day judicial remand for the former PTI chairman. The hearing was adjourned until January 6.

The crux of the accusations revolves around Khan and Bushra allegedly retaining gifts received during their official visits to foreign countries while Imran Khan served as the prime minister. Instead of following the prescribed official protocol by depositing these gifts in the Toshakhana, the couple purportedly kept them and contributed an amount less than the stipulated value into the national treasury.

Bushra, in particular, is accused of holding on to various jewelry items received as gifts during official visits. The list of allegedly retained gifts includes a locket, two rings, two ear tops, and two bracelets received on June 26, 2019. In 2020, she reportedly acquired a diamond-studded gold necklace, ring, bracelet, and ear tops. The list expanded in 2021 with the addition of a necklace, earrings, ring, and bracelet.

Despite repeated requests from the NAB for the return of these gifts, especially the jewelry items, Bushra has allegedly failed to comply. In response, the NAB directed her to appear at the NAB Rawalpindi office on December 11 and bring the specified ornaments with her. Subsequently, Bushra obtained bail until December 13 in this case from the accountability court in Islamabad.

Source: The Express Tribune
 
It seems there are too many cases for Imran Khan to fight at the moment and it looks very likely that he will be in the Jail till the general election at least.
 
Imran looks to SC to have Toshakhana conviction suspended

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan moved the Supreme Court on Saturday regarding the suspension of his conviction in the Toshakhana case until the final judgement on his appeal pending in the federal capital's high court.

Represented by Advocate Latif Khosa, Imran appealed against the Islamabad High Court's (IHC) decision, emphasising that challenging this ruling is his prerogative and argued that being declared ineligible before the elections infringes upon his fundamental rights.

The PTI founder raised concerns about the election commission's swift decision which he contended displayed bias.

Imran requested the apex court to nullify the IHC decision and suspend the sentencing in the Toshakhana case.

Expressing the urgency of the matter, the PTI founder urged the apex court to expedite proceedings, emphasising on the upcoming general elections. He stressed that the leader of the country's “largest political party” should not be excluded from participating in the electoral process and requested the suspension of the decision in the Toshakhana case to enable his participation.

Imran out of electoral race, for now

The capital’s high court on Tuesday dismissed Imran’s application seeking suspension of his conviction in the gift repository case. This order has effectively eliminated the possibility of the PTI founder contesting the upcoming general elections scheduled for February 8, 2024.

A division bench of the IHC presided over by Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and comprising Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri unveiled its order on the former PM’s application requesting the IHC to modify its August 28 decision.

A trial court on August 5 convicted the PTI founder in a case related to misuse of the state’s gift repository—Toshkhana—and sentenced him to three years in prison. The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on August 8 disqualified Imran as a lawmaker given his conviction.

The former premier approached the IHC against the trial court’s order and an IHC division comprising Justice Farooq and Justice Jahangiri on August 28 suspended his sentence.

Toshakhana case

The crux of the accusations revolves around Imran and Bushra allegedly retaining gifts received during their official visits to foreign countries while Imran served as the prime minister. Instead of following the prescribed official protocol by depositing these gifts in the Toshakhana, the couple purportedly kept them and contributed an amount less than the stipulated value into the national treasury.

Bushra, in particular, is accused of holding on to various jewellery items received as gifts during official visits. The list of allegedly retained gifts includes a locket, two rings, two ear tops, and two bracelets received on June 26, 2019. In 2020, she reportedly acquired a diamond-studded gold necklace, ring, bracelet, and ear tops. The list expanded in 2021 with the addition of a necklace, earrings, ring, and bracelet.

Source : The Express Tribune
 

LHC dismisses plea seeking action against all lawmakers who hid Toshakhana gifts​


The Lahore High Court’S (LHC) Justice Raheel Kamran dismissed a plea on Friday seeking directives for the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to file criminal complaints against all those members of the national and provincial assemblies who did not disclose Toshakhana gifts in statement of assets and liabilities, instead of just former premier Imran Khan.

Petitioner Tanveer Sarwar requested the court to direct the chief election commissioner to remain impartial, fair and just as per the ECP’s constitutional mandate, and refrain from “selective prosecution at its own whims and wishes”.

He further prayed that the ECP, till the final decision of this case, be directed to initiate criminal prosecution against all members of the provincial and national assemblies who did not disclose the state gifts acquired by them in their statement of assets and liabilities.

During today’s proceedings, petitioner’s counsel advocate Nadeem Sarwar implored the court that the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) founding chairman Imran Khan was sentenced to three years in prison on August 5, 2023 by a court in Islamabad, in the Toshakhana case, pertaining to the non-disclosure of the detail of state gifts in his assets and liabilities form.

He argued that the case was “eye opening, and the worst case of selective prosecution as the respondent ECP, while acting unfairly and discriminatorily, only singled out Imran Khan while ignoring and pardoning all other national as well as provincial assemblies’ members who retained gifts, but did not disclose them”.

“The act of the respondent ECP of not filing complaints… falls afoul of Article 25 of the Constitution of Islamic republic of Pakistan, 1973, which commands that all persons are equal before law and required to be treated alike in all the situations,” Sarwar stated.

The counsel maintained that big political leaders like former president Asif Zardari, ex-prime ministers Yousaf Raza Gillani, Nawaz Sharif and Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, and ministers Khawaja Asif among others also did not disclose the details of their Toshkhana gifts, but were free from any liability or criminal prosecution “because the respondent ECP on its own whims and wishes did not want to proceed against them”.

“That non-filling of complaints against other members clearly depicts that the respondent ECP is partial, biased and failed to perform its duties under the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan,” he further maintained.

The counsel argued that it was good practice to hold politicians accountable for their wrongdoing, but the accountability must not be limited to a single person alone. “Each and every person should be held accountable in the widest national and public interest,” he stated.

The lawyer argued the ECP’s action was not only against the law, but was tantamount to misconduct.

Source : The Express Tribune
 

LHC dismisses plea seeking action against all lawmakers who hid Toshakhana gifts​


The Lahore High Court’S (LHC) Justice Raheel Kamran dismissed a plea on Friday seeking directives for the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to file criminal complaints against all those members of the national and provincial assemblies who did not disclose Toshakhana gifts in statement of assets and liabilities, instead of just former premier Imran Khan.

Petitioner Tanveer Sarwar requested the court to direct the chief election commissioner to remain impartial, fair and just as per the ECP’s constitutional mandate, and refrain from “selective prosecution at its own whims and wishes”.

He further prayed that the ECP, till the final decision of this case, be directed to initiate criminal prosecution against all members of the provincial and national assemblies who did not disclose the state gifts acquired by them in their statement of assets and liabilities.

During today’s proceedings, petitioner’s counsel advocate Nadeem Sarwar implored the court that the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) founding chairman Imran Khan was sentenced to three years in prison on August 5, 2023 by a court in Islamabad, in the Toshakhana case, pertaining to the non-disclosure of the detail of state gifts in his assets and liabilities form.

He argued that the case was “eye opening, and the worst case of selective prosecution as the respondent ECP, while acting unfairly and discriminatorily, only singled out Imran Khan while ignoring and pardoning all other national as well as provincial assemblies’ members who retained gifts, but did not disclose them”.

“The act of the respondent ECP of not filing complaints… falls afoul of Article 25 of the Constitution of Islamic republic of Pakistan, 1973, which commands that all persons are equal before law and required to be treated alike in all the situations,” Sarwar stated.

The counsel maintained that big political leaders like former president Asif Zardari, ex-prime ministers Yousaf Raza Gillani, Nawaz Sharif and Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, and ministers Khawaja Asif among others also did not disclose the details of their Toshkhana gifts, but were free from any liability or criminal prosecution “because the respondent ECP on its own whims and wishes did not want to proceed against them”.

“That non-filling of complaints against other members clearly depicts that the respondent ECP is partial, biased and failed to perform its duties under the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan,” he further maintained.

The counsel argued that it was good practice to hold politicians accountable for their wrongdoing, but the accountability must not be limited to a single person alone. “Each and every person should be held accountable in the widest national and public interest,” he stated.

The lawyer argued the ECP’s action was not only against the law, but was tantamount to misconduct.

Source : The Express Tribune
In PK the law only umpires IK. AZ,NS and Maryam took cars illegally, Maryam admitted it on camera but no case.
 

LHC to hear plea against Toshakhana ruling from Jan 12​

ISLAMABAD/ LAHORE: The petitions filed against the disqualification of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder chairman Imran Khan in the Toshakhana case have been fixed for hearing by the Lahore High Court for January 12.

According to the details, the LHC has fixed the petitions filed by Imran Khan against disqualification in the Toshakhana case.

On the request of Imran Khan, a 5-member larger bench headed by Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan will hear from January 12.

Other members of the bench will include Justice Shams Mehmood, Justice Shahid Karim, Justice Shehram Sarwar Chaudhry and Justice Jawad Hasan.

It should be noted that the founder chairman of PTI has challenged the decision of disqualification in the Toshakhana case in the Lahore High Court through his lawyers.

Meanwhile, in a related development, a special court has initiated the release procedures for PTI leader Imran Khan following the confirmation of his bail by the Supreme Court in the Official Secrets Act case, commonly known as the cypher case.

Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain, presiding over the special court, issued the release orders after the submission of Imran Khan's bail from the top court and the presentation of surety bonds.

However, it is pertinent to note that despite securing bail, the PTI's founding chairman will continue to remain incarcerated in Adiala Jail. This is due to his involvement in the Toshakhana case, concerning allegations related to a 190 million pound case.

The special court, established under the Officials Secret Act 1923, on December 14 accepted the Federal Investigation Agency’s (FIA) plea, seeking an in-camera trial of the former premier and former foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi. The trials have been taking place at Adiala jail.

Source: The Express Tribune
 

Court indicts Imran Khan, Bushra Bibi in Toshakhana reference​

RAWALPINDI: An accountability court on Tuesday indicted Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan and his spouse Bushra Bibi in the Toshakhana reference filed against them by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB).

The decision was announced during a hearing in the case today which was conducted in Adiala jail — where the former prime minister is currently incarcerated in the case.

A five-member special prosecution team of the anti-graft watchdog perused the reference against the duo.

Accountability court Judge Muhammad Bashir conducted the hearing of Toshakhana and £190 million cases in the prison.

A day earlier, the court deferred the indictment of the former prime minister and his wife after the latter failed to appear before the court.

During the hearing today, NAB prosecutor Muzaffar Abbasi along with his team was present in the court. Khan was represented by his lawyers Latif Khosa and Umair Niazi.

Bushra Bibi was also provided with a copy of the £190 million case today.

Meanwhile, the former premier has challenged his disqualification in the Toshakhana case.

A five-member larger bench headed by Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan and comprising Justice Shams Mehmood, Justice Shahid Karim, Justice Shehram Sarwar Chaudhry and Justice Jawad Hassan will take up the petitions on January 12 (Friday).

Source: GEO
 
The same old is going on and on and on. One day Imran Khan gets a bail in one case and then he gets indicted in another case on the next day.
 
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday reserved its verdict on the admissibility of petitions against the jail trial of PTI founder Imran Khan in the Toshakhana and £190 million NAB references.

The petitions seeking annulment of Imran’s jail trial in the two cases were heard by IHC judges Justice Miangul Hasan Aurangzeb and Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir, with PTI counsel Sardar Latif Khosa representing the former premier.

Khosa, while reading out the jail trial notifications and giving reference to multiple court verdicts stated that they have challenged the two notifications regarding the Toshakhana and Al-Qadir Trust case jail trials.

He added that one of their petitions was allotted a number, while the other was not.

On Justice Aurangzeb’s question about approaching the court weeks after the notification issued in November 2023, Khosa replied that the reference against Imran was filed on December 20; which led to the discovery that a daily trial was being conducted.

“A division bench gave a short judgment of annulling the cypher jail trial on November 21, with no order being issued in this regard by any judge,” the judge added.

Khosa, agreeing to Justice Aurangzeb’s remarks, stated that the trial then commenced after the court verdict.

The judge stated that they were moving the court to determine the validity of the jail trial process and not to assess the place of trial.

“There were no suggestions by the judge in this case, and no one ordered to conduct the jail trial based on security concerns,” said Khosa.

Justice Aurangzeb asked Khosa if the trial had commenced before the reference was filed against Imran. To which, the PTI counsel stated that the trial was started before the reference was filed, questioning how the federal government was aware of filling a reference if the notification was issued after the start of the jail trial.

Khosa also highlighted that the appointment of the accountability court judge was also invalid.

He further informed the court that the PTI founder has even challenged the judge’s appointment, stating that the judge was appointed on deputation with his retirement just around the corner.

The judge is holding the trials daily, just to wrap up the case at the earliest, said Khosa.

Justice Aurangzeb questioned “If there is an accountability court in Islamabad, then the rest of the work is affected? Are the judges going to jail? Are the judges of the accountability court doing any other judicial work? Is that the only thing they do?”.

Khosa said Justice Gulzar Ahmed had been informed about three accountability courts in Islamabad. To which Justice Aurangzeb stated that the then PTI-led government had not approved the appointment of judges in the accountability court.

Only Imran’s cases are being heard with such speed, while other cases are still pending in the accountability courts; said Khosa.

Khosa remarked that the NAB was busy in hearing the cases daily with more witnesses expected to have their statements recorded in the case tomorrow.

Justice Aurangzeb stated that Toshakhana is a state treasury and the Cabinet secretary is its custodian.

Following these remarks, the court reserved its verdict on the petition's admissibility against the PTI founder's jail trial in both cases.

On November 21, 2023, IHC declared the proceedings of Imran's trial in jail in the cypher case null and void.

Source : The Express Tribune
 

Toshakhana reference: Witness spots 'clerical error' in jewellery item's specification report​

RAWALPINDI: A witness in the Toshakhana reference against the incarcerated Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan on Saturday spotted a "clerical error" in a jewellery item’s specification report.

The accountability court judge Muhammad Bashir in Rawalpindi conducted the hearing of the Toshakhana reference at the Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi.

At the outset of the hearing, two witnesses recorded their testimonies before the court, whereas, the lawyers cross-examined one of the witnesses who conducted an estimation of the expensive Toshakhana gifts including a jewellery set and a bracelet watch to ascertain its market value.

The witness, in his statement, confirmed that his company had been approached by Pakistan’s Consul General in Dubai to conduct an estimation of the said jewellery set and the bracelet watch.

He detailed he was given the responsibility to search market value of the jewellery articles which he had completed and submitted an estimation report to the consul’s office in Dubai.

In his statement, the witness said that the estimated value of the pricey Graff jewellery set was $19.492 million.

The witness apprised the court that diamond experts and jewellery manufacturers were approached. Besides, a complete market survey was conducted for the preparation of the estimation report he added.

He, however, admitted that the specification list of the article was not provided to the investigation officer (IO).

The defence lawyer also raised questions over a flaw in the estimation report as the diamond’s physical weight was mentioned in “gramme(s)” instead of “carat(s)”. The witness termed it a “clerical error”.

During cross-examination, the defence lawyer questioned the credibility of the entire approximation process of the state gifts acquired by the PTI founder from the Toshakhana.

The counsel queried whether the consul general had been handed over a report prepared by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). The witness denied the claim.

The lawyer further questioned the reasons for not providing the estimation report to the IO if the market survey was not conducted in real.

To this, the witness also rejected claims against the estimation process. However, he admitted that the input documents from the diamond expert were also not handed over to the IO.

Responding to another query, the witness said that the monetary value of diamonds could neither be ascertained through their colour nor photos but specifications.

After the lawyer completed cross-examination, the accountability court adjourned the hearing till January 23.

On January 9, an accountability court had indicted Imran Khan and his spouse Bushra Bibi in the Toshakhana reference filed against them by NAB.

The decision was announced during a hearing in Adiala jail — where the former prime minister is currently incarcerated in the case.

A five-member special prosecution team of the anti-graft watchdog had perused the reference against the duo.

Accountability court Judge Muhammad Bashir had conducted the hearing of Toshakhana and £190 million cases in the prison.

Source: GEO
 

Toshakhana reference: Witness spots 'clerical error' in jewellery item's specification report​

RAWALPINDI: A witness in the Toshakhana reference against the incarcerated Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan on Saturday spotted a "clerical error" in a jewellery item’s specification report.

The accountability court judge Muhammad Bashir in Rawalpindi conducted the hearing of the Toshakhana reference at the Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi.

At the outset of the hearing, two witnesses recorded their testimonies before the court, whereas, the lawyers cross-examined one of the witnesses who conducted an estimation of the expensive Toshakhana gifts including a jewellery set and a bracelet watch to ascertain its market value.

The witness, in his statement, confirmed that his company had been approached by Pakistan’s Consul General in Dubai to conduct an estimation of the said jewellery set and the bracelet watch.

He detailed he was given the responsibility to search market value of the jewellery articles which he had completed and submitted an estimation report to the consul’s office in Dubai.

In his statement, the witness said that the estimated value of the pricey Graff jewellery set was $19.492 million.

The witness apprised the court that diamond experts and jewellery manufacturers were approached. Besides, a complete market survey was conducted for the preparation of the estimation report he added.

He, however, admitted that the specification list of the article was not provided to the investigation officer (IO).

The defence lawyer also raised questions over a flaw in the estimation report as the diamond’s physical weight was mentioned in “gramme(s)” instead of “carat(s)”. The witness termed it a “clerical error”.

During cross-examination, the defence lawyer questioned the credibility of the entire approximation process of the state gifts acquired by the PTI founder from the Toshakhana.

The counsel queried whether the consul general had been handed over a report prepared by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). The witness denied the claim.

The lawyer further questioned the reasons for not providing the estimation report to the IO if the market survey was not conducted in real.

To this, the witness also rejected claims against the estimation process. However, he admitted that the input documents from the diamond expert were also not handed over to the IO.

Responding to another query, the witness said that the monetary value of diamonds could neither be ascertained through their colour nor photos but specifications.

After the lawyer completed cross-examination, the accountability court adjourned the hearing till January 23.

On January 9, an accountability court had indicted Imran Khan and his spouse Bushra Bibi in the Toshakhana reference filed against them by NAB.

The decision was announced during a hearing in Adiala jail — where the former prime minister is currently incarcerated in the case.

A five-member special prosecution team of the anti-graft watchdog had perused the reference against the duo.

Accountability court Judge Muhammad Bashir had conducted the hearing of Toshakhana and £190 million cases in the prison.

Source: GEO
Fake cases against the Kaptaan. But no cases against Nani who confessed to her theft of the BMW from Toshakhana.
 
Back
Top