What's new

China aggressively pursues research, investment while India has 'red tape': German Nobel laureate

Hornbill

Tape Ball Captain
Joined
Jan 22, 2016
Runs
1,145
China is more aggressive in pursuing scientific research, investment and strategy as compared to India which has more 'red tape' acting as a barrier to communication between researchers, according to German Nobel Laureate Klaus von Klitzing.

China is the second largest spender in Research and Development (R&D) after America, according to the US' National Science Foundation and National Science Board in 2018.

Klitzing, 76, who was awarded the 1985 Nobel Prize in Physics for the discovery of the integer quantum Hall effect, told PTI that "India and China are emerging players in the world but when it comes to research, China is much more aggressive in terms of investment and strategy".

Chinese economy has laid a thrust on science and innovation and made massive investments in R&D, the German physicist said at the 69th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting which officially opened on Sunday at this Bavarian Island.

More patents are filed in China than in India any given year and its output in research papers is also higher, he said.

In 2017, China spent about 2.1 per cent of its GDP on R&D, while India spent less than 1 per cent.

According to the World Intellectual Property Organisation, China applied for about 1.34 million patents in 2016, while India (both resident and non-resident Indians) filed for just over 45,000 patents.

China is also far ahead than India in terms of investment in artificial intelligence, self-driving cars and robotics.

What has also helped China's leap in innovation is its liberal visa policy for scientists to boost knowledge exchange, said Klitzing.

"The study of material science is very strong in India and I get so many invitations from knowledge sharing platforms. But I need a visa to come here and there is a lot of red tape unlike China where there is a special long-term visa for Nobel laureates. India should also think of a five-year visa as opposed to its current 30-day visa policy," he said, adding that knowledge exchange should be both ways.

"Young Indian scientists go to the US but not Germany because they think language would be a barrier there. But it is just a misconception. Also, professors in India need to recommend young talent. Professors in China, South Korea and Japan are more straightforward in their approach and frequently recommend bright students," he said.

Klitzing also said that nationalism posed a danger to science.

"As scientists, we need to fight this. Facts are the basis of science. Science needs to promote open discussion and interactions," he said.

On a lighter note, Klitzing who won the Nobel at just 43 said that winning the coveted award at a later age is better since one can "win more money and accolades".

https://wap.business-standard.com/a...ape-german-nobel-laureate-119070500751_1.html
 
East Asians prioritize important things while South Asians focus on the wrong stuff. Pakistan used to be ahead of South Korea in the 60s and now they’re miles ahead of us.
 
This is 100% true. The Indian bureaucratic system is the same that was inherited from the Brits. Thats system was designed to keep the colonial population under the thumb.

Nehru didnot change it as he too envisioned his family ruling the country and hence keeping the citizens unfer control was necessary.

It was only in 1992 that MMS and PVNR that red tapism was broken. Vajpayee govt further broke it. The UPA though passed the RTI act, stopped further reforms to help its corrupt practices. Modi did a lot of reforms, at least 100 plus colonial laws were junked.

But we are still miles away, not until every colonial law, including the IPC is changed, will we truly have reformed.
 
China should not be compared to India.

China is a top dog. India is like that eager obese runner who wants to compete at Olympic s. Everyone knows that the dead weight is something India has to lose. But it cannot.
 
Same the case with Pakistan.

To me this is bcz we follow british way of working (though we made this much more complicated bcz of our slave mentality) while Chinese follow the american way of working.
 
Same the case with Pakistan.

To me this is bcz we follow british way of working (though we made this much more complicated bcz of our slave mentality) while Chinese follow the american way of working.

The secret to China's success is their pragmatic and practical approach to everything, China does whatever works for them and aren't afraid of going against their own principles if it works to their advantage. Deng Xiaoping is a good example, despite being a communist, he realized the importance of free trade and capitalism.

What Pakistan needs is to mix idealism with realism. You can't build countries solely on idealism and you can't inspire change and growth with realism.
 
Forget India, China has america sweating. These guys are lead by engineers so for them there is a solution or hack to every problem. The world may not agree with their method especially when it comes to human right but they have figured out a way to get things done quickly.
 
China is far from top dog. People posting here have no idea about reputation of their scientific research. American/ European universities even ban their students from citing Chinese research due to rampant plagiarism and lack integrity.

They have kept their cities clean but rural China suffers from the same issues as south Asian countries (lack of drinkable water, poor hygiene etc.).

And China is also corrupt. I remember reading articles on how Chinese students would “buy” PhD degrees by paying off their supervisors.
 
I dread a world where China is a complete dominant power
 
I dread a world where China is a complete dominant power

There should never be a sole superpower on earth. When the Soviets lost the Cold War, the US became the sole superpower and went for hardcore, aggressive foreign policy abroad. The amount of destruction the US has done in the past 20-25 years is huge.
 
Back
Top