Yossarian
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Runs
- 13,897
- Post of the Week
- 1
An Irish veterinarian with degrees in history and politics has been unable to convince a machine she can speak English well enough to stay in Australia.
Louise Kennedy is a native English speaker, has excellent grammar and a broad vocabulary. She holds two university degrees – both obtained in English – and has been working in Australia as an equine vet on a skilled worker visa for the past two years.
But she is now scrambling for other visa options after a computer-based English test – scored by a machine – essentially handed her a fail in terms of convincing immigration officers she can fluently speak her own language.
Earlier this year, Kennedy decided she would seek permanent residency in Australia on the grounds of her vocation, as a shortage profession. She knew she would have to sit a mandatory English proficiency test but was shocked when she got the results of her Pearson Test of English (PTE) Academic.
While she blitzed all other components of the test including writing and reading, she failed to reach the minimum score immigration requires in oral fluency. She got 74 when the government requires 79.
[....]
“There’s obviously a flaw in their computer software, when a person with perfect oral fluency cannot get enough points,” she said.
Pearson has categorically denied there is anything wrong with its computer-based test or the scoring engine trained to analyse candidates’ responses.
https://www.theguardian.com/austral...oral-english-test-needed-to-stay-in-australia
I'm betting if she had spoken English in a Chinese or desi accent, instead of an Irish accent, she would have passed with flying colours.

[MENTION=732]Gilly[/MENTION] Comment?