I’ve already discussed the Imam ul Haq topic in detail months ago in his thread, with the same posters and the same set of questions. Everything has been covered thoroughly, his role, where he fits in the batting order, and how he could adapt. It’s tiring to keep repeating the same points.
ODI cricket can be approached in many different ways, depending on your strengths and the talent you have at your disposal. Pakistan has already tried players like Usman Khan, Irfan, Kamran Ghulam, Tayyab, and others who supposedly fit the aggressive, run-and-gun style. But let’s be honest, they looked out of their depth and were technically not up to the mark. That experiment has already failed.
Imam is not a perfect solution, but he is experienced, averages close to 50 in ODIs, and has shown he can handle quality international bowling. He has a solid technique and has performed in tough conditions. Given the alternatives, he deserves a proper run to see if he can adjust and contribute in a different role, even in the middle order.
We need to pick a team based on the players we have, not some ideal lineup that doesn’t exist. These constant changes and endless chopping are only hurting the team’s progress in ODI cricket. We’ve already discussed this point in this and other threads multiple times.
This is ODI cricket, not T20. People need to stop forcing a T20 mindset onto everything. Play according to your strengths and make the most of the experience and skill available. Or go back to trying the same players who have failed to deliver and watch the team slide even further. That seems to be the alternative.
.
