What's new

Controversially Yours by Shoaib Akhtar

It's funny that despite the Mohali win, India are still living in that 03 world - it's a comfort blanket. The insecurity breeded by Akhtar having had the better of Tendulkar throughout and rating the likes of Ponting and even Inzamam up there as tougher to bowl to. :)))
 
Last edited:
Rajan, dear, dear Rajan: a 90-years old, paraplegic and blind Shoaib Akhtar can clean-bowl Mumbai's midget without throwing a ball, so, please, don't even evoke Bhajji, you're insulting SRT...


... his ability to get owned by a great bowler, by showing Bhajji-don't-know-how-I-got-400-wickets-srsly as some decent bat. He was just high that day, happens to everyone.
 
It's funny that despite the Mohali win, India are still living in that 03 world - it's a comfort banket. The insecurity breeded by Akhtar having had the better of Tendulkar throughout and rating the likes of Ponting and even Inzamam up there as tougher to bowl to. :)))

That's what chronic insecurity does to a mind; it forces the person to live in the past cause the future is hopeless.
 
If ICC announces an award for the best controversial player in the history of the game, Shoaib Akhtar will win it hands down
 
lol, what Ross Taylor ? He'll say him to thank Kamran Akmal, otherwise it would have been his first duck, and the fact that Shoaib Akhtar took 17 Test wickets v. New Zealand at a ridiculous average of 5.23. :)
Hilarious, isn't it, that someone you called an 'ordinary' bowler averages 5 against a Test nation ? 5 being a dream for Indian trundlers, and the average height of your batting legends.

And please, don't bring the usual Indian sauce: "we've destroyed the career of Saqlain Musthtaq, Waqar Younis, etc etc". It becomes really irritating to see you guys doing a cerebral sati because Teenda had a rare good day against his baap Shoaib Akhtar. Video already posted. :)
Enjoy your hopely-soon-defunct-stay on this forum differently bro'. :)

AkheR just yorked Rajan at 100 mph.

:)
 
SEEN everything

wasim was spot on...
back then ... waqar was out of form in 1999 india series shoiab came in the team.. and rest in history..

shoiab made debut after pakistan already won the test series vs west indies in 1997 leading by 2-0 with 1 to play.

there is no question... it was wasim... who gave him break... and told him many things....

trusting other people advice is like trusting usa on 9/11 anyhow

i will never ever trust any one... unless i have seen myself or heard it ...

No debate at all on that.

I remember that as if it was yesterday, Waqar had lost quite a bit of pace and failed to keep Shoaib out, he barely broke into the one day squad during the 1999 world cup.

Shoaib ruined his own career with his behaviour and off field activities, If I was Wasim I would have done exactly the same. And If it was Imran Khan I doubt he would have come near the dressing room let alone get onto the field.
 
Akhtar for a start doesnt even qualify to give opinions about the best batsmen that he has bowled to .

Now if some Legend like Murali or Warne gives so & so opinions then there comments will be appreciated but who cares if a Kaneria or Harbhajan start giving there opinions. Same with Akhtar, what is he in the 1st place to judge others?
 
Akhtar for a start doesnt even qualify to give opinions about the best batsmen that he has bowled to .

Now if some Legend like Murali or Warne gives so & so opinions then there comments will be appreciated but who cares if a Kaneria or Harbhajan start giving there opinions. Same with Akhtar, what is he in the 1st place to judge others?

He is the fastest bowler that the world has ever seen and the guy who averages 25 with the bowl in test cricket which is better than ANY bowler in the history of Indian cricket and not to mention the fact he has the made the so called best batsman in the world his bunny(see post 273)
 
Last edited:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qqhdDA922Xw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


i am buying this book , once i found out where i can get it :127:
 
No they are not, because they were not THE quickest bowler of all time. I'm sensing some form of comprehension issue armaan, get checked brah :127:
 
when will it launch in Pakistan ? anyone knows if Liberty will ship it worldwide or to canada ?
 
Should be crazy to actually believe Sachin was "SCARED" of Akhtar...Sachin has played various great bowlers around the world...played decent to dominated them through out his career. A batsman can take a back seat when top class bowlers like akhtar are in form...but to actually write that in his book as if he is scared of the bowler totally is just being desperate for attention.

And I wonder why people are not talking about his comment on dravid...which is just so utterly stupid that even a 10 yr old who has seen dravid play will not!!!

Releasing his book in Bangalore, making controversial statements on Tendu/Dravid and shahrukh Khan explains why!!!
 
Then Tait, Lee , Hayward & even Bond are Legends.

but akhtar was yards quicker than all these kids
his record of 100.2mph n 161.3kph is yet to be break
all these kids failed to break akhtars fastest delivery record

in the near future if any one can break it
it could be only vinay kumar or praveen kumar no one else
the way both these dude unleashed their thunder bolts of 120 kph
they got a great chance to break akhtars record
 
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/V7w1usVr-M0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Interesting.
 
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qqhdDA922Xw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


i am buying this book , once i found out where i can get it :127:

WTH has he done to his English ?? its deteriorated faster than India's fielding.
 
So is it true that Sachin has responded?
 
The Biggest Reason Wasim And Waqar Didn't Like Me Was That They Didn't Get As Many Girl's Numbers As I Used To Get - Akhtar
 
Seems like you can only order from India, so went ahead and got it through uread.com if anyone's interested. They ship internationally and you can use Paypal. win. (cost is around 15 euros including shipping).
 
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qqhdDA922Xw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


i am buying this book , once i found out where i can get it :127:

Shoaib: We all know him as a great batsman and the best batsman world has ever seen and we needs to be thankful..world cricket needs t be thankful Sachin has played this game!

Poor NH, his pleasure nipped in the bud itself :(
 
FFS for once ... a goddamn thread is NOT ABOUT TENDULKAR.

A minute quote out of a large autobiography has been quoted because of marketing, because the book is being released in India. This DOES NOT mean the book is about Tendulkar/Dravid/India/Other Greasies.
 
Seems like you can only order from India, so went ahead and got it through uread.com if anyone's interested. They ship internationally and you can use Paypal. win. (cost is around 15 euros including shipping).

Ordered. :)
Tried with Buy Books India.com ... but the JavaScript dies when I want to pay. T_T
 
Miandad gets mentioned twice:

1. Apparently he is the one that switched the ball in the umpire's pocket.

2. Saqlain Mushtaq runs after him to hit him with the bat. Was Saqi out of his mind?! :13:
 
FFS for once ... a goddamn thread is NOT ABOUT TENDULKAR.

A minute quote out of a large autobiography has been quoted because of marketing, because the book is being released in India. This DOES NOT mean the book is about Tendulkar/Dravid/India/Other Greasies.

I know! And I actually like Sachin. But I said it before and I say it again, PP needs to observe a Sachin-free week or month. Every thread seems to become a peeing contest between Sachin fans and haters.

Can PP use auto-censorship to delete any post that has Sachin Tendulkar in it and ban the poster that brings his name up in a non-Sachin thread? :wasim
 
I know! And I actually like Sachin. But I said it before and I say it again, PP needs to observe a Sachin-free week or month. Every thread seems to become a peeing contest between Sachin fans and haters.

Can PP use auto-censorship to delete any post that has Sachin Tendulkar in it and ban the poster that brings his name up in a non-Sachin thread? :wasim

high time!! or just ask a certain poster to not come online..if he does...all he talks is how sachin is crap!!!
 
That's what chronic insecurity does to a mind; it forces the person to live in the past cause the future is hopeless.

Umm was that a backhanded slap at some of your fellow PPers here, coz most of what I read about Ind-Pak rivalry here are throwbacks to the "great era" when Pak dominated India (which to a limited extent is fact, mind you).

On topic, exactly the kind of stuff you'd expect from Shoaib. Ensuring everyone's eyes are on him. While he was on the field he did it brilliantly with the ball and now probably through some ghost writer.

Nevertheless always entertaining to see the likes of Namak Halaal always ready to spontaneously combust at the very mention of the "S" word. :sachin
 
lol, what Ross Taylor ? He'll say him to thank Kamran Akmal, otherwise it would have been his first duck, and the fact that Shoaib Akhtar took 17 Test wickets v. New Zealand at a ridiculous average of 5.23. :)
Hilarious, isn't it, that someone you called an 'ordinary' bowler averages 5 against a Test nation ? 5 being a dream for Indian trundlers, and the average height of your batting legends.

And please, don't bring the usual Indian sauce: "we've destroyed the career of Saqlain Musthtaq, Waqar Younis, etc etc". It becomes really irritating to see you guys doing a cerebral sati because Teenda had a rare good day against his baap Shoaib Akhtar. Video already posted. :)
Enjoy your hopely-soon-defunct-stay on this forum differently bro'. :)

Brilliant :)))
 
No mention of Nasim Ashraf? Come on man...how could you. I thought they had some serious beef.
 
Wasim bhai has been confirmed as the biggest cancer and snake to have played for Pakistan...not that there was any doubt about that...but Shoaib also adding himself to the list those putting Wasim in his true place is just an icing on the cake...
 
Where can I buy this book?

To answer some of these lousy *********. Akhtar was too old to bowl that fast...Still he bowled his heart out....he sweat more than anyone on the ground...He was playing 110% of himself out in the field...You should be happy that ******* dropped those catches resulting in exclusion of Akhtar otherwise...You GOD would have seen another GOLDEN DUCK in your so called "Match of the Century" Yaad rhukna...Ghar main kuta bhee shair hota hay"...Our guys like Saeed, Shahid and Akhtar along with Saq, Wasim and Waqar owned your ass in India on number of occassions...Not to mention, stand alone innings of Salim Malik with a broken arm is the best example ever...Now go cry in the corner and start drinking some DAMN milk to produce a bowler like him!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Indian Media will always spice and juice up things to create controversies and mislead the public. Once you read the book only then will you understand the context of those comments.

This is what he has said about Wasim Akram not wanting him in the team and threatening to walk out if he was picked with 5-6 other players. This was in 1997 when Shoaib was an unknown commodity and Wasim had not idea about his match winning abilities. So its not exactly what the Indian media is reporting.

New Delhi: Shoaib Akhtar in his autobiography ‘Controversially Yours’ has accused Waseem Akram of trying to ruin his career. He says he succeeded in keeping him out of the first Test match but it was the board that insisted that new blood must be given a chance.

The following are excerpts from his autobiography:

What can I tell you about my first Test match! The one I had prepared for all my life. Wasim Akram was the captain and he told the board he wouldn’t play Shoaib come what may. Perhaps he wished to continue with the previous team because he was satisfied with its performance or perhaps he didn’t want to encourage the emergence of a new fast bowler. Perhaps the memory of my outburst in Karachi held him back. Whatever the reason, Wasim succeeded in keeping me out of the first Test but the board insisted that new blood be given a chance; they wanted him to try me out in particular. The result was that I became the discordant note within the team, the bone of contention between Wasim and the selectors.

The Pakistan Cricket Board had announced that I would play and the team’s captain had responded by threatening to quit if I did. But the board held on. So Wasim pushed the issue further and said five other members of the team were threatening to not play if Shoaib was allowed to. There was a division in the team even before the match started, and a controversy arose in which I unwittingly played a part. On one side was me, a mere youngster, and on the other side were the senior players, all of them in a state of mutiny. I sat quietly at the back of the dressing room, horrified at this turn of events. I didn’t want to exacerbate matters by being visible or audiable.

Majid Khan phoned Salim Altaf, who was the chief selector at the time, an told him to ask Wasim if he would abide by the board’s decision or else he was sending replacements and would accept Wasim’s resignation as captain. Wasim backed down but was furious with the decision and came back to the dressing room, shouting and swearing. I was to bear the burnt of his ire. I wanted to ask if anyone could explain to me how all this was my fault but I kept quite. This was my first Test match, so you can imagine my state – I was all nerves! It was only when I saw Wasim striding out for the toss in a ferocious mood that I allowed myself to believe that I was going to play.

Link: http://www.newsbullet.in/sports/cricket/18346-akram-was-reluctant-to-play-me-shoaib

Comments: I believe this to be true because i was an even avid cricket fan back then in 1997 as compared to now and i remember reading a brief article in the papers where there were rumours of discord b/w Wasim and the selectors over selection issues with Wasim threatening to quit if he didnt get the team he wanted. Didnt know the bone of contention was Shoaib, but Shoaib's version now adds up the pieces now.

Bottomline, its not a big deal. Akram at the time didnt know of Shoaib's true match winning abilities and Shoaib at the time obviously felt not getting a chance to play for Pakistan, anyone trying to block his selection to the team would be trying to ruining his career. Any new player will feel the same way. You just need that one chance, one opening to make your mark in life, once its gone or it doesnt happen, you will in most cases be history. This is the true context of Shoaib's remarks.

Bottomline all the fans, ex test cricketers accusing Shoaib of commiting sacrilege by making these comments about Wasim need to take a chill pill and read the book first.


Below is the excerpt from the book with regards to the IPL, SRK issue.

New Delhi: Pakistani bowler Shoaib Akhtar has made some sensational claims in his autobiography 'Controversially Yours'. In his book, Akhtar has alleged that he was cheated by Shah Rukh Khan and former IPL Chairman Lalit Modi. He states, "Shahrukh and I talked about my not being happy with the money settled on me. Shahrukh and Modi got me to agree. I should have never listened to Modi and Shahrukh."

Excerpts from Shoaib's book

Akhtar says, towards the end of 2007, we learned that not one but two leagues of club cricket, the Indian Premier League (IPL) and the Indian Cricket League (ICL) were created in India. This generated a lot of interest among the players. Shahrukh Khan had got in touch with me to play for his team. During the meeting I got the feeling that it was Saurav Ganguly and not Shahrukh who wanted me on the team.

When the bidding took place I was disappointed. I let Shahrukh know I was not happy with the money settled with me. Both he and Modi promised me they would eventually give me more money. Meinu behla phusla ke- I'll get this for you, I'll get that for you, they got me to say yes. Lalit Modi told me I wouldn't regret my decision and that he would ensure I made more money through endorsements and the like, but that never happened.

Links: http://www.newsbullet.in/india/34-more/18350-shahrukh-and-modi-cheated-me-alleges-shoaib

Comments: Again the context is what clarifies everything. Shoaib was naturally upset with Modi because Modi banned Shoaib's participation in the IPL after DNA banned him for 5 years hence cutting all his access to the big $$$. It was reported at the time in 2007 that Shoaib had received a pretty big offer from the ICL, something to the tune of $1 million plus, SRK, KKR and Modi in return promised to pay Shoaib a higher fee as a result in return he would shun the ICL.

Shoaib refused the ICL contract, the ICL tournament ended, the IPL contract came and Shoaib was shocked to see $425,000 only, he went to SRK to complain and SRK in return promised to further pay up the originally agreed amount in the future as well. This happened with Ponting too as well. The excerpts are self explanatory. I believe this because i read brief snippets in the news, articles about this in 2008 at the time when all this was taking place and with Shoaib now coming out about this, it adds more clarity.

Not for the first SRK is accussed of being selfish, a deceiver, a two timer.
 
I know! And I actually like Sachin. But I said it before and I say it again, PP needs to observe a Sachin-free week or month. Every thread seems to become a peeing contest between Sachin fans and haters.

Can PP use auto-censorship to delete any post that has Sachin Tendulkar in it and ban the poster that brings his name up in a non-Sachin thread? :wasim

high time!! or just ask a certain poster to not come online..if he does...all he talks is how sachin is crap!!!

If that poster was on any other forum, he would've at least had infraction but since here most posters seems to enjoy reading his bs posts.
Admins are forgetting the fact that PP is one of those rare cricket forums where fans from almost every cricketing nation frequent.. daily cat-fights over Sachin is bringing down the quality of the MB drastically!

Huge compromise on quality for Sachin bashing :(

For the betterment or continuation of quality, hope this issue gets addressed in the Admin forum.
 
Last edited:
New Delhi: Controversial former Pakistan pacer Shoaib Akhtar released his autobiography 'Controversially Yours' on Friday. And in an exclusive interview with CNN-IBN, the Rawalpindi Express talked about the startling revelations he made in the book, ranging from match fixing, ball tampering and Sachin Tendulkar not being his favourite batsman.

Gaurav: I will get into the specifics of the book in a second. But I wanted to ask you this: you had a successful career, over 400 international wickets, you played 40-odd Test matches for Pakistan, nearly 170 one-day games. You look back on your career with pride or with regret for what might have been?

Shoaib: I've taken a lot of pride because right from day one, I knew my knees are not going to cope up with the pressure and the load what I am going to put on my poor knees, and my dear Pakistan Cricket Board is always going to trouble me with the kind of attitude that I have, someone who just loves the game and loves to serve the country. (They should have) Left me alone after 6 o' clock. Whether I want to do bungee jump or ride a motorcycle, it's my life. At that particular time, I thought that I might make it that far, but I knew at the bottom of my heart that I'm not going to go that far. Because if I have to play three one-dayers and then fourth one-dayer, then my knees gonna be this much; it's gonna swell up.

Gaurav: In your career span, you missed more matches than you played.

Shoaib: Yes, that's true. Because, if I had played those matches, I probably would have been in my grave right now.

Gaurav: Let me now talk to you about some of the specific things you have mentioned in the book. I want to start with this startling revelation that you've made, that ball tampering is something that's rampant in the game, and not just that, it's something that you yourself conceded that you indulged in.

Shoaib: There're two things that happen in cricket, as i mentioned in the book: match fixing and ball tampering. It does happen.

Gaurav: Tell me first about ball tampering because for years, Pakistan's cricket establishment has said that this is the conspiracy of the west or of the white cricket nations against Pakistan, that all the bowlers, when they succeed, are accused of ball tampering. Now you are admitting that you yourself tampered with the ball regularly.

Shoaib: Yes, and so an English player does it. Sachin has done it, New Zealand players have done it. So the whole world does it. So match-fixing has happened all around. But the thing is I don't call it tampering; it's called looking after the ball. The rougher side has to be roughest. It shouldn't be wet, it shouldn't be greased off, it should not be put in your palms so that it gets wet or something. Secondly, when you have that kind of condition on the ball, then you need the art to swing, then you need pace to reverse it back. Lot many people know. When Wasim and Waqar went to county cricket, they did the same thing there. So the county people came to know about ball tampering.

Gaurav: You say that you believe it should be legalised, it should be made legal by the ICC?

Shoaib: Everyday of a match I played against anyone, trust me - Indian, Pakistani, English or whatever - they use substance on the ball. Either they scratch it with the zip or they put stuff to shine it more. It happens everyday. I am categorically saying that it happens.

Gaurav: And it's not just the Pakistanis?

Shoaib: It's not just a Pakistani issue. It is wrong what I'm saying but actually we are the one who started it. Because if we look at our conditions, they're dry, dead and very flat wickets. The ball does not go flying, the new ball does not swing at all. Then what other options we are left behind with? So we had to create something to get people out, which is ball tampering.

Gaurav: It's an honest admission Shoaib. The other thing that will get a lot of people talking, and you've touched upon it yourself, is you pretty much said in your book that match fixing is a fact of life in cricket.

Shoaib: Both things, tampering and match-fixing.

Gaurav: Let's talk about match fixing.

Shoaib: Match fixing happens left, right and centre. I've been approached. Because when I was playing, at that particular time, Pakistan cricket was actually jeopardised by match fixing and everything. And people were just going haywire every now and then. And I promised myself that I'm not going to get into the group, with match fixing, bookies or anything. I never took any phone calls or anything.

Gaurav: What do you say Shoaib, 60, 70, 80, 90, how much percentage of the Pakistan team was involved in match fixing?

Shoaib: Look, there was match fixing in Australia, there was match fixing in South Africa, there was match fixing in India; it was in Pakistan. Everybody is affected by this disease, not any single one. English cricket has a tradition to keep their manners, keep their traditions. Because when English cricketers retire, they can go out, they can work. Whether he lives alone or with his girlfriend, or anyone else stays with him, he only has to look after himself. They have no problem. They have never allowed money to come into cricket. Look at football and cricket when they were rising together back in the '60s. Cricket was a very popular game. People used to come in to watch Test matches. And secondly, money came into football, but not in cricket. Now you have to understand our way of living. Whoever comes from, like myself, a humble background, if he is not preached well, not brought up well by the parents, he is bound to indulge in this (match fixing) and get tangled.

Gaurav: The reason why your comments are important is because you were a player within the team and a lot of allegations have gone on before. There have been investigations against some of the most respected figures in Pakistan cricket at the moment. And you say in your book that "I have lost respect for these players". So you are saying that there are great Pakistani players who indulge in match fixing.

Shoaib: My people say, "we didn't do it." But why in the first place my name never came up? Because I never interacted with those people; I've beaten them up.

Gaurav: Why haven't you named the players who you believe were involved in match fixing?

Shoaib: No, no. Do I know match fixing happens? It does happen. I don't know what happens behind the door. I don't have a genie who will catch the culprit for me. There've been films made on this. So I do believe it happens, categorically I've said this. Secondly, the cultural aspect which I was telling you. In Pakistan, there are six children in one household, with one bread-earner who has a salary of Rs. 2000. So you come from that culture and you're not educated as well.

Gaurav: So it's an economic necessity?

Shoaib: Yes! Why money hasn't been allowed to come into cricket?

Gaurav: Many in India are fascinated by what you've written about Tendulkar. For instance, it seems to suggest from what you've written that you don't quite place Tendulkar at the same level as Brian Lara, Ricky Ponting, Viv Richards. And you believe he isn't quite the match-winning batsman than others. You say he is a great batsman.

Shoaib: Is there any pressure on me to just love him? I mean I love him as it is but my personal favourite is someone else. I mean we have to love him for what he has done for cricket, what he has done for his country; you have to admire. You can't disown Sachin for what he has done, what he has achieved.

Gaurav: But according to Shoaib Akhtar he is not the greatest batsman to have played the game?

Shoaib: My favourites are someone else.

Gaurav: No, not your favourites. But is he not the greatest batsman to have played the game.?

Shoaib: No, he is the greatest among all of them. World cricket needs to be thankful to Sachin Tendulkar. That's what I've said already. Cricket needs to be thankful to great Sachin to have played this game. But my favourite is Brian Lara.

Gaurav: You write in the book how the third ball you bowled at him (Brian Lara), you hit him on the face.

Shoaib: The late Bob Woolmer loved him (Lara) the most. When he got to know me properly, we got on very well with each other. Then we said sad goodbyes to each other in the World Cup that I didn't go to. He said, "Listen, Brian Lara has a huge bat-lift, and I coached him, and if you bowl a yorker towards his toes, I think with your pace he's going to miss it." And when I bowled the first ball, it was 96.7 mph, Lara flicked it, the ball hit the fence and came back to the wicketkeeper. Then I looked at Bob, and said, "Bob, what were you thinking?"

Gaurav: One other question I have to ask you about Sachin as you've written so much in your book. In your battles with him over the years - you played him in Test cricket and one-day cricket and you knocked him over in Kolkata in one of your first few Test matches - did you believe you dominated Tendulkar? Who won that? Let's say it was a boxing match, who won it at the end of it all?

Shoaib: No, I wouldn't call winning it or losing it. On a particular day, he had the edge. And when Sachin had a tennis elbow, I had an edge. I had pace, I was fit. And I hit Sachin on the head and I got him out. That is fine. But if you go to 2003 World Cup, he had an edge. I was unfit, struggling with my knees, and he hit me out of the park.

Gaurav: So it's 50:50? Let's call it that!

Shoaib: He is a great player. I'm nowhere close to Sachin. What he has done for cricket, I have done nothing (in comparison). So he is great. Let it be like that.

Gaurav: Couple of other things I want to ask you about. Interesting thing you write about the IPL. You seem to suggest again, in fact you write about it quite openly, that you felt betrayed almost by Shah Rukh Khan and Lalit Modi for what they promised you and what it ended up being.

Shoaib: No, I never said I was betrayed by Shah Rukh Khan. I was betrayed by Lalit Modi, that's what I said. There were a lot of things that were happening because my cricket board wanted to ban me and Lalit Modi had to go along with it. But we should have gone with the legal (IPL) contract that I signed. There was nothing such mentioned in the contract that if your board (PCB) goes against you, then you will be dropped.

Gaurav: But you say you could have made much more money in the ICL.

Shoaib: I promise you I could have gone easily for three seasons, I could have made a lot of money. And mostly people have done that. They played ICL for two years; they made a lot of chunk out of it. But I'm not worried about the money; I never wanted the money. Pakistan board paid players to not play the ICL; I even refused that. I said, "I don't want to play." My chairman came to me and said, "You sign an IPL contract through me," but I siad I don't want to. I wanted to sign individually. If you feel I should go through you, then you do what you want to, and he banned me.

Gaurav: Do you think back on your IPL experience, and there were some great moments in there, especially the game against Delhi Daredevils? Do you look back with fondness or do you regret the fact that you played the IPL and missed out on may be other things.

Shoaib: No, money has never been important for me. And I told you many times that if I wanted to earn money, I could have gone out and made chunk of it. But my respect matters a lot to me. And I was really, really amazed, and it was a very moving moment for me when I saw the Indian crowd for the first time cheering for a Pakistani who was playing for their team. A huge competition was going on. The roads were blocked, lobby was jam packed. Shah Rukh on one side and I on the other side. Thousands of people were there to greet me and to love me. To absorb that kind of energy and to have that kind of love and absorb, it was an amazing feeling.

Link: http://cricketnext.in.com/news/match-fixing-happens-all-the-time-shoaib/60330-13.html
 
I think its safe to surmise this book is sensational.

Sachinistas, please control your insecurities in this thread.

This thread is about a great Pakistani who not just happens to hold the record for the world's fastest bowler, but a bowler who bowls twice the speed of any Indian bowler on a good day - on a bad day - Shoaib Akhter.
 
Last edited:
The Indian Media will always spice and juice up things to create controversies and mislead the public. Once you read the book only then will you understand the context of those comments.

This is what he has said about Wasim Akram not wanting him in the team and threatening to walk out if he was picked with 5-6 other players. This was in 1997 when Shoaib was an unknown commodity and Wasim had not idea about his match winning abilities. So its not exactly what the Indian media is reporting.



Link: http://www.newsbullet.in/sports/cricket/18346-akram-was-reluctant-to-play-me-shoaib

Comments: I believe this to be true because i was an even avid cricket fan back then in 1997 as compared to now and i remember reading a brief article in the papers where there were rumours of discord b/w Wasim and the selectors over selection issues with Wasim threatening to quit if he didnt get the team he wanted. Didnt know the bone of contention was Shoaib, but Shoaib's version now adds up the pieces now.

Bottomline, its not a big deal. Akram at the time didnt know of Shoaib's true match winning abilities and Shoaib at the time obviously felt not getting a chance to play for Pakistan, anyone trying to block his selection to the team would be trying to ruining his career. Any new player will feel the same way. You just need that one chance, one opening to make your mark in life, once its gone or it doesnt happen, you will in most cases be history. This is the true context of Shoaib's remarks.

Bottomline all the fans, ex test cricketers accusing Shoaib of commiting sacrilege by making these comments about Wasim need to take a chill pill and read the book first.


Below is the excerpt from the book with regards to the IPL, SRK issue.



Links: http://www.newsbullet.in/india/34-more/18350-shahrukh-and-modi-cheated-me-alleges-shoaib

Comments: Again the context is what clarifies everything. Shoaib was naturally upset with Modi because Modi banned Shoaib's participation in the IPL after DNA banned him for 5 years hence cutting all his access to the big $$$. It was reported at the time in 2007 that Shoaib had received a pretty big offer from the ICL, something to the tune of $1 million plus, SRK, KKR and Modi in return promised to pay Shoaib a higher fee as a result in return he would shun the ICL.

Shoaib refused the ICL contract, the ICL tournament ended, the IPL contract came and Shoaib was shocked to see $425,000 only, he went to SRK to complain and SRK in return promised to further pay up the originally agreed amount in the future as well. This happened with Ponting too as well. The excerpts are self explanatory. I believe this because i read brief snippets in the news, articles about this in 2008 at the time when all this was taking place and with Shoaib now coming out about this, it adds more clarity.

Not for the first SRK is accussed of being selfish, a deceiver, a two timer.

very well said :14:
 
New Delhi: Controversial former Pakistan pacer Shoaib Akhtar released his autobiography 'Controversially Yours' on Friday. And in an exclusive interview with CNN-IBN, the Rawalpindi Express talked about the startling revelations he made in the book, ranging from match fixing, ball tampering and Sachin Tendulkar not being his favourite batsman.

Gaurav: I will get into the specifics of the book in a second. But I wanted to ask you this: you had a successful career, over 400 international wickets, you played 40-odd Test matches for Pakistan, nearly 170 one-day games. You look back on your career with pride or with regret for what might have been?

Shoaib: I've taken a lot of pride because right from day one, I knew my knees are not going to cope up with the pressure and the load what I am going to put on my poor knees, and my dear Pakistan Cricket Board is always going to trouble me with the kind of attitude that I have, someone who just loves the game and loves to serve the country. (They should have) Left me alone after 6 o' clock. Whether I want to do bungee jump or ride a motorcycle, it's my life. At that particular time, I thought that I might make it that far, but I knew at the bottom of my heart that I'm not going to go that far. Because if I have to play three one-dayers and then fourth one-dayer, then my knees gonna be this much; it's gonna swell up.

Gaurav: In your career span, you missed more matches than you played.

Shoaib: Yes, that's true. Because, if I had played those matches, I probably would have been in my grave right now.

Gaurav: Let me now talk to you about some of the specific things you have mentioned in the book. I want to start with this startling revelation that you've made, that ball tampering is something that's rampant in the game, and not just that, it's something that you yourself conceded that you indulged in.

Shoaib: There're two things that happen in cricket, as i mentioned in the book: match fixing and ball tampering. It does happen.

Gaurav: Tell me first about ball tampering because for years, Pakistan's cricket establishment has said that this is the conspiracy of the west or of the white cricket nations against Pakistan, that all the bowlers, when they succeed, are accused of ball tampering. Now you are admitting that you yourself tampered with the ball regularly.

Shoaib: Yes, and so an English player does it. Sachin has done it, New Zealand players have done it. So the whole world does it. So match-fixing has happened all around. But the thing is I don't call it tampering; it's called looking after the ball. The rougher side has to be roughest. It shouldn't be wet, it shouldn't be greased off, it should not be put in your palms so that it gets wet or something. Secondly, when you have that kind of condition on the ball, then you need the art to swing, then you need pace to reverse it back. Lot many people know. When Wasim and Waqar went to county cricket, they did the same thing there. So the county people came to know about ball tampering.

Gaurav: You say that you believe it should be legalised, it should be made legal by the ICC?

Shoaib: Everyday of a match I played against anyone, trust me - Indian, Pakistani, English or whatever - they use substance on the ball. Either they scratch it with the zip or they put stuff to shine it more. It happens everyday. I am categorically saying that it happens.

Gaurav: And it's not just the Pakistanis?

Shoaib: It's not just a Pakistani issue. It is wrong what I'm saying but actually we are the one who started it. Because if we look at our conditions, they're dry, dead and very flat wickets. The ball does not go flying, the new ball does not swing at all. Then what other options we are left behind with? So we had to create something to get people out, which is ball tampering.

Gaurav: It's an honest admission Shoaib. The other thing that will get a lot of people talking, and you've touched upon it yourself, is you pretty much said in your book that match fixing is a fact of life in cricket.

Shoaib: Both things, tampering and match-fixing.

Gaurav: Let's talk about match fixing.

Shoaib: Match fixing happens left, right and centre. I've been approached. Because when I was playing, at that particular time, Pakistan cricket was actually jeopardised by match fixing and everything. And people were just going haywire every now and then. And I promised myself that I'm not going to get into the group, with match fixing, bookies or anything. I never took any phone calls or anything.

Gaurav: What do you say Shoaib, 60, 70, 80, 90, how much percentage of the Pakistan team was involved in match fixing?

Shoaib: Look, there was match fixing in Australia, there was match fixing in South Africa, there was match fixing in India; it was in Pakistan. Everybody is affected by this disease, not any single one. English cricket has a tradition to keep their manners, keep their traditions. Because when English cricketers retire, they can go out, they can work. Whether he lives alone or with his girlfriend, or anyone else stays with him, he only has to look after himself. They have no problem. They have never allowed money to come into cricket. Look at football and cricket when they were rising together back in the '60s. Cricket was a very popular game. People used to come in to watch Test matches. And secondly, money came into football, but not in cricket. Now you have to understand our way of living. Whoever comes from, like myself, a humble background, if he is not preached well, not brought up well by the parents, he is bound to indulge in this (match fixing) and get tangled.

Gaurav: The reason why your comments are important is because you were a player within the team and a lot of allegations have gone on before. There have been investigations against some of the most respected figures in Pakistan cricket at the moment. And you say in your book that "I have lost respect for these players". So you are saying that there are great Pakistani players who indulge in match fixing.

Shoaib: My people say, "we didn't do it." But why in the first place my name never came up? Because I never interacted with those people; I've beaten them up.

Gaurav: Why haven't you named the players who you believe were involved in match fixing?

Shoaib: No, no. Do I know match fixing happens? It does happen. I don't know what happens behind the door. I don't have a genie who will catch the culprit for me. There've been films made on this. So I do believe it happens, categorically I've said this. Secondly, the cultural aspect which I was telling you. In Pakistan, there are six children in one household, with one bread-earner who has a salary of Rs. 2000. So you come from that culture and you're not educated as well.

Gaurav: So it's an economic necessity?

Shoaib: Yes! Why money hasn't been allowed to come into cricket?

Gaurav: Many in India are fascinated by what you've written about Tendulkar. For instance, it seems to suggest from what you've written that you don't quite place Tendulkar at the same level as Brian Lara, Ricky Ponting, Viv Richards. And you believe he isn't quite the match-winning batsman than others. You say he is a great batsman.

Shoaib: Is there any pressure on me to just love him? I mean I love him as it is but my personal favourite is someone else. I mean we have to love him for what he has done for cricket, what he has done for his country; you have to admire. You can't disown Sachin for what he has done, what he has achieved.

Gaurav: But according to Shoaib Akhtar he is not the greatest batsman to have played the game?

Shoaib: My favourites are someone else.

Gaurav: No, not your favourites. But is he not the greatest batsman to have played the game.?

Shoaib: No, he is the greatest among all of them. World cricket needs to be thankful to Sachin Tendulkar. That's what I've said already. Cricket needs to be thankful to great Sachin to have played this game. But my favourite is Brian Lara.

Gaurav: You write in the book how the third ball you bowled at him (Brian Lara), you hit him on the face.

Shoaib: The late Bob Woolmer loved him (Lara) the most. When he got to know me properly, we got on very well with each other. Then we said sad goodbyes to each other in the World Cup that I didn't go to. He said, "Listen, Brian Lara has a huge bat-lift, and I coached him, and if you bowl a yorker towards his toes, I think with your pace he's going to miss it." And when I bowled the first ball, it was 96.7 mph, Lara flicked it, the ball hit the fence and came back to the wicketkeeper. Then I looked at Bob, and said, "Bob, what were you thinking?"

Gaurav: One other question I have to ask you about Sachin as you've written so much in your book. In your battles with him over the years - you played him in Test cricket and one-day cricket and you knocked him over in Kolkata in one of your first few Test matches - did you believe you dominated Tendulkar? Who won that? Let's say it was a boxing match, who won it at the end of it all?

Shoaib: No, I wouldn't call winning it or losing it. On a particular day, he had the edge. And when Sachin had a tennis elbow, I had an edge. I had pace, I was fit. And I hit Sachin on the head and I got him out. That is fine. But if you go to 2003 World Cup, he had an edge. I was unfit, struggling with my knees, and he hit me out of the park.

Gaurav: So it's 50:50? Let's call it that!

Shoaib: He is a great player. I'm nowhere close to Sachin. What he has done for cricket, I have done nothing (in comparison). So he is great. Let it be like that.

Gaurav: Couple of other things I want to ask you about. Interesting thing you write about the IPL. You seem to suggest again, in fact you write about it quite openly, that you felt betrayed almost by Shah Rukh Khan and Lalit Modi for what they promised you and what it ended up being.

Shoaib: No, I never said I was betrayed by Shah Rukh Khan. I was betrayed by Lalit Modi, that's what I said. There were a lot of things that were happening because my cricket board wanted to ban me and Lalit Modi had to go along with it. But we should have gone with the legal (IPL) contract that I signed. There was nothing such mentioned in the contract that if your board (PCB) goes against you, then you will be dropped.

Gaurav: But you say you could have made much more money in the ICL.

Shoaib: I promise you I could have gone easily for three seasons, I could have made a lot of money. And mostly people have done that. They played ICL for two years; they made a lot of chunk out of it. But I'm not worried about the money; I never wanted the money. Pakistan board paid players to not play the ICL; I even refused that. I said, "I don't want to play." My chairman came to me and said, "You sign an IPL contract through me," but I siad I don't want to. I wanted to sign individually. If you feel I should go through you, then you do what you want to, and he banned me.

Gaurav: Do you think back on your IPL experience, and there were some great moments in there, especially the game against Delhi Daredevils? Do you look back with fondness or do you regret the fact that you played the IPL and missed out on may be other things.

Shoaib: No, money has never been important for me. And I told you many times that if I wanted to earn money, I could have gone out and made chunk of it. But my respect matters a lot to me. And I was really, really amazed, and it was a very moving moment for me when I saw the Indian crowd for the first time cheering for a Pakistani who was playing for their team. A huge competition was going on. The roads were blocked, lobby was jam packed. Shah Rukh on one side and I on the other side. Thousands of people were there to greet me and to love me. To absorb that kind of energy and to have that kind of love and absorb, it was an amazing feeling.

Link: http://cricketnext.in.com/news/match-fixing-happens-all-the-time-shoaib/60330-13.html

My respect for Shoaib Akthar has increased tenfold.

PS: The interviewer is blatantly a Sachinista.
 
Below my dignity to react to Shoaib's comment: Tendulkar

NEW DELHI: Sachin Tendulkar declined to comment on controversial Pakistan cricketer Shoaib Akhtar's remark that he and teammate Rahul Dravid did not havethe ability to finish matches.
"It is below my dignity to react to Shoaib's comment," Tendulkar was quoted as saying by television channels.
However, the channels did not showany visuals to substantiate Tendulkar's reaction.
Tendulkar also did not come up withany reaction on his twitter account regarding Akhtar's observation in his just published biography, " Controversially Yours ", which created a flutter in the cricketing world.
In the book, Akhtar has claimed that Tendulkar and Dravid, who have scored 56,000 between them in Tests and ODIs , lack the ability to finish matches.
Akhtar, who retired from international cricket during the World Cup this year, referred to India's tour of Pakistan in 2006 and said that his team could have faced ahumbling defeat but for the fact thatthey managed to rein in Tendulkar.
 
Akhtar is pretty much true. He probably din't agree to play for money with Akram, so thats why Akram din't want him to play in the team.

Not even surprised by the follwing comment by him

Akhtar has stated in his book that the Pakistani all-rounder was PCB's stooge. "Shoaib Malik doesn't deserve to be captain and was made captain because he was a stooge of the PCB Chief Naseem Ashraf," states Akhtar.
 
Shoaib: No, he is the greatest among all of them. World cricket needs to be thankful to Sachin Tendulkar. That's what I've said already. Cricket needs to be thankful to great Sachin to have played this game. But my favourite is Brian Lara.


Shoaib: He is a great player. I'm nowhere close to Sachin. What he has done for cricket, I have done nothing (in comparison). So he is great. Let it be like that.

My respect for Shoaib Akthar has increased tenfold.

Are you sure about that :23:

I'm guessing you're about to burst into tears at the obvious backtracking by Shoaib to sell a few more books in India.
 
I think its safe to surmise this book is sensational.

.

...And I think its also safe to say that this book was designed to attract the Indian market and Indian media more importantly, for a massive publicity for his book. What he said about Sachin was said years ago by Imran, its nothing new. Besides you have debates on this topic like every other week on various message boards on the net.

All his talk about Ganguly is better than Dhoni/Dravid is so unnecessary and hardly insightful. The Indians had their debates and opinion on this.

What I as a Pakistani was expecting from book was something insightful about PCB administration, the real stories behind some of the most controversial decisions taken over the years. The real reasons/his reactions behind his numerous bans. His relations with Nasim Ashraf, Bob Woolmer, team members, the grand captaincy confusion that led to young Malik being appointed as a captain, Younis Khan's captaicny dramas, Razzaq and Yousuf' ICL darams, and his last years under Afridi's much waited and talked about captaincy.

Why is he only mentioning the same old Indian players...what about the players he played from Australia, England, SA, Sri Lanka etc etc.
 
Last edited:
Akhtar seeks to downplay controversial remarks against Sachin

.NEW DELHI: Controversial speedster Shoaib Akhtar , who questioned Sachin Tendulkar's ability to finish matches in his biography, sought to play down the remarks by saying that he was only referring to a particular incident when he felt the star Indian batsman "was trying to save himself."
"I never said that Sachin was scared of me. I just said in the context about players not being comfortableon particular occasions. I have also felt that a number of times," Akhtar said at the launch function of his book 'Controversially Yours' on Friday.
"It was one such occasion when Sachin had tennis elbow problem and was unable to hook and pull. On that particular day, I felt that Sachin was trying to save himself. That doesn't mean that he was buzhdil (coward). It's just when you are uncomfortable, whether you are tail-ender or Sachin Tendulkar , you tend to save yourself," he said.
Then lavishing praise on Tendulkar he said, "He has had a fabulous last few years. He is the greatest batsman. Unse humara kya muqabla(How can I be compared with Tendulkar)."
Akhtar also tried to set the record straight about what he actually meant when he said that Rahul Dravid was not a "match-winner".
"Again I would like to mention that Ispoke about a particular phase. Dravid was always a nightmare for bowlers in Test matches. But again he transformed his game in the ODIs.So, it was about a particular time."
Shoaib didn't mince words when he said that a lot of fights are on in the Pakistan dressing room.
"But thank God, we atleast fought in the dressing rooms but your Harbhajan Singh slapped someone inthe open," he said in jest referring tothe off-spinner's infamous slap on Sreesanth.
On the best international batsmen he has bowled to, he said "Brian Larais the best batsmen I have bowled to but I have enjoyed my duels with Matthew Hayden . He liked taking me on and I liked taking him on. Also Justin Langer would be very irritating as he would slip through me while running between the wickets."
 
Almost all Pakistani pacers tampered with ball, admits Shoaib

Controversial Pakistani speedster Shoaib Akhtar has created a flutter by openly admitting that he, alongwith all his comtemporaries in the team, have regularly indulged in ball-tampering.
Pakistan fast bowlers over generations have always been underscanner for ball-tampering whenever they have got the ball to swing more than usual but Akhtar is the first to admit that he indulged inthe malpractice, which is banned in international cricket.
"Almost all Pakistani fast bowlers have tampered with the ball. I may be the first one to openly admit to it but everybody is doing it," the maverick fast bowler has revealed inhis just-published biography " Controversially Yours ."
"To be honest, every team in the world tampers with the ball. We probably started it but today koi team doodh ki dhooli nahin hain. No team is innocent and virtually every fast bowler does it. That is the only way to survive because the wickets are so slow.
Akhtar, who was twice suspended by ICC for ball tampering during his career, defends the speed merchantsfor indulging in this illegal cricketingactivity.
"After years of not allowing bouncers, in 2001, the ICC ruled that only one would be allowed per over.The pitches are dead and slow and made to order for batting. It's the bowlers who are curtailed. It's like giving match practice to people. We are hit all over the ground," he lamented in his book.
In his tell-all book, Akhtar cited examples of how he had indulged in doctoring the ball during his playing career. It was in a three-nation tournament in Sri Lanka after 2003 World Cup, the bowler recalled an incident in Dambulla while playing against New Zealand.
"I remember it being very hot and humid in Dambulla and as is customary with the pitches of the sub-continent, it was an awfully slow track. We were playing New Zealand, we needed results. Out of desperation, I began fussing with the ball. Yes, for those of you who want to know, I did tamper with the ball in that match. And yes I know it's against the rules and not something to be proud of - I aplogised for it," Akhtar wrote.
Not only this, Akhtar was candid in admitting that he has "tampered with the ball on many occasions."
"I have tampered with the ball on many occasions. Have been warned several times and even being caughttwice - Dambulla was one such instance. I was suspended for a match and fined 75 per cent of the match fees," he said in the book.
But Akhtar also confessed that it hadslowly become a habit.
"I can't seem to help it. I have got to do something with the ball. I know this will make a big noise but I won't lie about it."
Not only about his own antics but Akhtar also revealed the secret of an unnamed Pakistan cricketer who actually changed a ball in order to get more reverse swing going.
"I won't name him but one Pakistanicricketer actually switched the ball in the umpires' pocket with one thatreversed like crazy. Umpires usually keep the ball in their coat pockets and then hang their coat up for lunch. That was when the transfer occured. After this incident, they now leave their coats in a locked room."
Akhtar then gives a detailed accountof how one can doctor the ball and asked ICC to atleast legalise scruffingthe seam with nails!
"There are so many ways to prepare the ball; It's not just a matter of scratching it. I have used my boot nails and zip of my back pocket. Many bowlers, use vaseline or gum on the ball. The only way to stop thisis for the ICC to ensure that atleast some pitches are prepared in favour of bowlers."
"That would make the game less one-sided and more balanced. The game, especially now, has become very unequal and only favours the batsman - if you bowl a no-ball, the batsman gets a free-hit; bouncers have been curtailed; and a bowler can't even touch his hair before picking up the ball", he wrote.
"They have restricted us so mercilessly, that I find it very difficult to feel entirely guilty about ball tampering."
He further added, "Since, we can't seem to stop doing it, may be it's not a bad idea to legalise it and set rules for it. After all, it's still an art to use that ball. You need the pace and skill. Not everyone can do it. Perhapssome manipulation of the ball, like scratching it with your nails could belegally allowed. I know I am going to get it in the neck for saying all this."
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...h-ball-admits-Shoaib/articleshow/10092295.cms
 
:)) oh Man, nice publicity by Akhtar. BTW someone should had Spoiler aleart on the thread title.
 
what did he say about musharraf though? i read some headline in dawn that he also says negative things about musharraf but there was nothing about it in the article
 
Controversy sells......how else he could have sold his book........take shots at legends.....talk about Match fixing and ball tampering...........
 
Akhtar unleashes more fury five months after his retirement.

Shoaib Akhtar is no alien to grabbing headlines, notably for the wrong reasons.

His recent controversy is not with a ball in hand, or even with a nail on it, but in the form of his autobiography that was launched in New Delhi yesterday. Five months away from the spotlight, Akhtar created waves as he came out with all the weapons in his armour, targeting former opponents as well as teammates.

Controversially Yours created a stir across the border, with the Indian media launching a scathing criticism due to an attack on Sachin Tendulkar. Excerpts, tweets coupled with the maverick Akhtar’s statements drew widespread reaction and criticism.

Tendulkar, though, refused to comment on the rising Akhtar delivery arguing that the Indian legend was not a match-winner.

“It’s below my dignity to react to Shoaib’s comment,” said Tendulkar. Akhtar also targeted former India batsman Rahul Dravid and said the duo feared his pace, just like everybody else.

“Every batsman has that fear when a bowler bowls close to 100 miles per hour,” said Akhtar. “It’s just a matter of disguising it well. Australians do it much better than the Indians.”

In the book, Akhtar has also accused Wasim Akram of destroying his career and recalled an incident when former spinner Saqlain Mushtaq ran towards the then coach Javed Miandad with a bat in his hand amid fear of getting dropped from the team.

He had words for Bollywood superstar Shahrukh Khan as well and said that while the India actor still owed him money after his Indian Premier League stint, he took good care of him. “He really looked after me when I was there. But I still haven’t received my money,” said Akhtar.

The second launch of the book takes place in Mumbai tomorrow but there are no signs for an official launch of the book this side of the border. “We have no plans on launching the book in Pakistan right now,” a spokesperson for Harper Collins, the publishers, told The Express Tribune.

The 36-year-old’s autobiography is likely to stay in the headlines in the coming days and while revelations keep on pouring, these are anxious moments for the cricket fraternity as Akhtar is bound to deliver more short-pitched stuff.

Quotable quotes

“I was offered Rs1.3 million in 1999 to indulge in match fixing”

“Everyone tampers with the ball. I did too. Tampering should be legalised”

“Dravid and Tendulkar weren’t match-winners”

“Akram destroyed my career”

“Malik was made captain because he was a stooge of Nasim Ashraf”

“I should have never listened to Modi and Shahrukh”

“Miandad was a great batsman but I think as a coach he left much to be desired”

“Waqar talks about team discipline and manners as if he was the epitome of it all”

“Someone else was facing a rape allegation, his name was kept a state secret and my name was sacrificed”

“If I ever get married and have children, I would never encourage them to join this profession”

“Tendulkar might have more runs and records but he lacked the ability to finish a game”

“The hardest batsman I ever bowled to was Inzamam. I never once got him out, not even in nets”

“Afridi did what he always does: leaked the news. He is very friendly with the Karachi media”

“Intikhab has been saying to me that he is sorry for everything that has happened”

Published in The Express Tribune, September 24th, 2011.

Link: http://tribune.com.pk/story/258958/shoaib-akhtar-short-pitched-stuff/
 
Shoaib’s tale: Beating odds to find stardom

N Ananthanarayanan, Hindustan Times

New Delhi, September 24, 2011

The controversies that have dogged him on and off the field have made former Pakistan fast bowler Shoaib Akhtar look less like a cricketer and more a prizefighter battling his demons. However, the 36-year-old, who touched upon all those issues in his autobiography, which are sure to grabattention in cricket-mad South Asia, also spoke candidly about his humble background and how he dared to dream big despite not possessing any of the poise that could have made his path to stardom smoother.

Discussing his book at the launch on Friday, Shoaib spoke about how he dodged the bus conductor while going to Lahore for trials because he had no money for the ticket. And how a horse-cart puller gave him shelter and fed him before he attended the trials, and how he remembered to visit the man after making a mark as an international bowler.

Shoaib explained how his knees had worn out, especially after he was made to bowl long spells in domestic cricket, even before he made it to the Pakistan team and how fluid had to be drained often before he went on to bowl.

“At every stage I was told I can't do this or that — that I can't replace Waqar Younis or Wasim Akram, I can't dismiss Tendulkar, and that I can't overcome my knee problem.”

He feels match-fixing, which has rocked Pakistan cricket time and again, is a product of the system. “Lack of education among players, a tendency to be corrupt and lack of grooming all play a part.”

According to Shoaib, leading Pakistan players have played a big role in painting each other black. “Understanding the pride of playing for one's country and courage is what matters.”

Link: http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-...ing-odds-to-find-stardom/Article1-749482.aspx
 
Not the man you know

Subhash Rajta, Hindustan Times

New Delhi, September 23, 2011

‘Controversially Yours’. There couldn't have been a more apt title to the autobiography of Shoaib Akhtar, arguably the most controversial cricketer of modern times. Naturally, the audience came to the book launch hoping for many more skeletons to tumble out of the former fast bowler's closet,especially with provoking excerpts like “Tendulkar was scared to face me” already doing the rounds.

That was, however, not to be. Instead, it was a defensive Shoaib on view. The Rawalpindi Express took pains to put to rest the controversies the book could generate. The first issue he tried to play down was the one about Tendulkar. The book says, “We managed to psychologically browbeat him. We bounced the ball at him and were able to unnerve him. I returned to the dressing room that first day with the knowledge that Sachin was not comfortable facing the fast and rising ball. And he was distinctly uncomfortable against me.”

Shoaib, however, clarified that his observation weren't general in nature. “He was suffering from tennis elbow and we knew he couldn't hook or pull, and would try to defend himself. Having said this, I don't mean he's scared of me or he can't face me,” he said.

He treaded with caution when asked about his remarks on Rahul Dravid and that he wasn't a match-winner. “Dravid is a nightmare to any bowler in Tests. Getting him out is like scaling the Himalayas. He has changed his ODI batting too. I am talking about a particular time, and people have transformed over a period of time,” said Shoaib.

Other than this, all he had to narrate were some juicy anecdotes from his personal life and the dressing room. But the bad boy of Pakistan cricket refrained from sharing anything that could startle his audience.

Shoaib did admit to ball-tampering, but played it down saying everyone does it. He dwelt on match-fixing, too, but refrained from giving out names or making oblique references.

So, what's the idea behind coming out with the book? “The idea is certainly not to create controversy. If I wanted that, I could have done it through other ways. The whole idea is to let people know my side of the story. I have been through so much, so I thought it was time I tell my side of the story.”

Link: http://www.hindustantimes.com/Not-the-man-you-know/Article1-749400.aspx
 
This guy is really damn hoenst. Respect for AKhtar

Honest? yeah, but surely you can't call it guts. He has retired, doesn't care who he pisses off in the board or in cricketing world. Nothing to fear, so he spills the beans out.
 
...And I think its also safe to say that this book was designed to attract the Indian market and Indian media more importantly, for a massive publicity for his book. What he said about Sachin was said years ago by Imran, its nothing new. Besides you have debates on this topic like every other week on various message boards on the net.

All his talk about Ganguly is better than Dhoni/Dravid is so unnecessary and hardly insightful. The Indians had their debates and opinion on this.

What I as a Pakistani was expecting from book was something insightful about PCB administration, the real stories behind some of the most controversial decisions taken over the years. The real reasons/his reactions behind his numerous bans. His relations with Nasim Ashraf, Bob Woolmer, team members, the grand captaincy confusion that led to young Malik being appointed as a captain, Younis Khan's captaicny dramas, Razzaq and Yousuf' ICL darams, and his last years under Afridi's much waited and talked about captaincy.

Why is he only mentioning the same old Indian players...what about the players he played from Australia, England, SA, Sri Lanka etc etc.


well bear in mind that we have no idea what is actually in the book itself.

maybe he does discuss the factors you mentioned. so far his promotion has been in india and only the india media has any form of reaction to his book.

so naturally they will pick the india related topics discussed in his book.

i think be patient, when it comes to pakistan and the pakistan media start analysing the book, im sure you will find he discusses what you have mentioned.

after all majority of his controversies are with pakistan not india.
 
^ that is what everyone does...Y would he talk **** while working for the same board. you idiot
 
300 rupees in India, surely not?

Can't wait to get my hands on this book.

With regards to ball tampering. What the Pindi man is saying according to the rules changing the condition of the ball is tampering but the ball is changed by everyone by rubbing, shining, spitting, throwing into the ground etc... He's not saying Pakistan bowlers did something out of the ordinary to achieve what they did.
 
lol who was facing rape allegations ? :facepalm:

is there any controversy Pakistani cricketers have never been involved in ? :)))
 
I'm guessing you're about to burst into tears at the obvious backtracking by Shoaib to sell a few more books in India.

:facepalm:

Firstly, there’s no need to apply bold emphasis on the word ‘India’.

Secondly, SA is not backtracking. On the contrary, you are unable to grasp the obvious because you are too busy struggling to equate the world into one. What is the obvious? SA holds two opinions of SRT. One opinion is in the context of – off the field – SRT, the other in the context of – on the field SRT.

Off the field SA respects SRT, on the field SA believes SRT is not only a coward but a WEAK batsman against ‘Phaast’ bowling let alone against the pioneering bowling of Pakistan the has changed the face of cricket. In simple English, there is a distinction between personality and player.

Lastly, I will never burst into tears because SA’s book will debut in India; you are so wrong. Again, your narrow minded love for SRT forbids you think beyond the box.

SA has detonated the truth in the heart of the Indian cricketing community, essentially, the soul of India. His book is not officially released, yet the Indian media is going crazy – no I do not mean in an expletive sense, I actually mean mentally crazy. SA’s autobiography has inflicted pain, misery and hurt among the millions and millions of Sachinistas. He has played on the insecurity of a Billion like a $5 banjo. His words are the chingari (spark) to the aag (fire) that is spreading like wildlife within India as I type. His words are causing panic among the nation of India. SRT doesn’t even have the sand to respond to SA; that's how brave SRT is - cough cough.

A true Pakistani causing all of this, in India, like a cornered tiger, in India’s backyard – the highest honour. In simple English, Shoaib Akthar is the cricketing version of the Islamic Bomb.

The reality is, if there are tears at my end, then they're tears of rejoicement.

Come back to me when you are not emotionally vulnerable and scarred.

:)
 
Last edited:
I ordered from Liberty books Pakistan. Its going to cost Rs 846, no idea when i will get the book though.
 
:facepalm:

Firstly, there’s no need to apply bold emphasis on the word ‘India’.

Secondly, SA is not backtracking. On the contrary, you are unable to grasp the obvious because you are too busy struggling to equate the world into one. What is the obvious? SA holds two opinions of SRT. One opinion is in the context of – off the field – SRT, the other in the context of – on the field SRT.

Off the field SA respects SRT, on the field SA believes SRT is not only a coward but a WEAK batsman against ‘Phaast’ bowling let alone against the pioneering bowling of Pakistan the has changed the face of cricket. In simple English, there is a distinction between personality and player.

Lastly, I will never burst into tears because SA’s book will debut in India; you are so wrong. Again, your narrow minded love for SRT forbids you think beyond the box.

SA has detonated the truth in the heart of the Indian cricketing community, essentially, the soul of India. His book is not officially released, yet the Indian media is going crazy – no I do not mean in an expletive sense, I actually mean mentally crazy. SA’s autobiography has inflicted pain, misery and hurt among the millions and millions of Sachinistas. He has played on the insecurity of a Billion like a $5 banjo. His words are the chingari (spark) to the aag (fire) that is spreading like wildlife within India as I type. His words are causing panic among the nation of India. SRT doesn’t even have the sand to respond to SA; that's how brave SRT is - cough cough.

A true Pakistani causing all of this, in India, like a cornered tiger, in India’s backyard – the highest honour. In simple English, Shoaib Akthar is the cricketing version of the Islamic Bomb.

The reality is, if there are tears at my end, then they're tears of rejoicement.

Come back to me when you are not emotionally vulnerable and scarred.

:)

ha ha, brilliant as usual NH.

Here is the bomb in action against India's percieved two best bats.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jiNSSH45Uok" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

imo, the two greatest consecutive balls in test match history. :)
 
Do you guys think he is telling the truth ? or hes just saying it for money because he will sell more books. I am a big fan of his but i don't know what to believe.
 
His words are the chingari (spark) to the aag (fire) that is spreading like wildlife within India as I type. His words are causing panic among the nation of India.

A true Pakistani causing all of this, in India, like a cornered tiger, in India’s backyard – the highest honour. In simple English, Shoaib Akthar is the cricketing version of the Islamic Bomb.

The reality is, if there are tears at my end, then they're tears of rejoicement.

Come back to me when you are not emotionally vulnerable and scarred.

:)

I'm really beginning to believe that Romalli Roti chap's Jeera Blade thing.
 
ha ha, brilliant as usual NH.

Here is the bomb in action against India's percieved two best bats.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jiNSSH45Uok" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

imo, the two greatest consecutive balls in test match history. :)

Mere bhai, listen to the commentary. It sums up the ignominy bestowed upon the bedrock of Indian cricket, exquisitely.

“This reverse swing is something the Pakistani specialise in”

“Here he is now, the maestro himself….. World’s best player coming out to bat, everyone has been waiting for him, what does he get first ball….”

“This young man has produced the ‘perfect’ delivery’

I am with you. The best consecutive balls in test match history Why? Value. Two wickets. The first, of the 2nd highest ever run scorer in ‘Test’ HISTORY - 12775 runs – Rahul Dravid. The next, the HIGHEST EVER run score in ‘Test’ HISTORY – 14965 – Mr none other than Sachin Tendulkar. Bitter sweet irony.

It should be duly noted; Dravid scored 24, SRT – Golden duck. This is the difference between class.

The best part of the video, the silence of the crowd.

Such poetic justice.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top