What's new

Cricket World Cup 2019: The Unlucky XI

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,029
While there were many surprise additions in the ICC Men's Cricket World Cup 2019 squads, a number of proven performers missed out. Here's a look at an XI that failed to make the cut.

Mohammad Rizwan (Pakistan)

Rizwan's exclusion came as a surprise since he has worked behind the stumps in Sarfaraz's absence before, and his omission leaves Pakistan without the option of a back-up wicketkeeper. The 26-year-old has played 32 one-day internationals and scored over 700 runs at an average of 33.57. Since his comeback in early 2017, after a two-year absence, Rizwan has hit two centuries; both tons came in Pakistan's 5-0 series defeat against Australia earlier this year, and his fluency in the middle was one of the rare bright spots in an otherwise dismal series for the hosts.

Niroshan Dickwella (Sri Lanka)

After Sri Lanka's disappointing returns in the ODI series against South Africa, a big overhaul was needed. But plenty of experienced players will be feeling unlucky to miss out, especially Dickwella. In the last 12 months, the wicket-keeper batsman has notched up 497 runs in 15 innings.

Rishabh Pant (India)

Pant was omitted from the squad to make way for the more experienced Dinesh Karthik. The selectors also felt that at 21, Pant will get many more chances in the future to prove himself. Yet the youngster's exclusion raised quite a few eyebrows. Although Pant has played only five ODIs so far, his aggressive stroke-making and the ability to take on any attack make him a potent batsman.

Ambati Rayudu (India)

Seven months ago, during the West Indies ODI series, India captain Virat Kohli backed Ambati Rayudu for the number four spot. However, Vijay Shankar's debut earlier this year brought about a 'three-dimensional' change in India's plans. Rayudu, who made a comeback to the ODI side in September 2018 after a gap of two years, has done exceptionally well since. Since his return, he has made four fifties, one century, and two forty-plus scores. And even though India have included Vijay, their number four issues are still far from being solved.

Dinesh Chandimal (Sri Lanka)

Chandimal, who debuted in 2010, has been one of the most successful batsmen for Sri Lanka in recent times. In 2018, Chandimal averaged 42.57, and even captain the team briefly. With 146 ODIs of experience behind him, Sri Lanka will be without the services of an experienced campaigner.

Jofra Archer (England)

Yet to play for England, Archer's name has been doing rounds for quite some time. A prolific bowler in T20 leagues around the world, his accurate yorkers make him a lethal threat. While the 24-year-old has not made the cut, he can still impress the selectors in the limited-overs series that England will play against Ireland and Pakistan in early May.

Asif Ali (Pakistan)

Belligerent Asif Ali's exclusion was unexpected, particularly, because Pakistan have rued the lack of power-hitters in the side. Having played only 11 games so far, his ODI numbers are modest but the 27-year-old is an excellent hitter at the death and could have filled a gap in the side which has been unaddressed for a long time. He is, however, in the squad to face England early next month, so the door may not be shut on his participation just yet.

Kieron Pollard (West Indies)

Although Pollard last played an ODI in 2016, his recent exploits in the Indian Premier League have brought him back in focus. The big right-hander has scored close to 200 runs in 10 IPL matches, playing a couple of match-winning knocks. He is a handy bowler and a terrific fielder and recently admitted that he was hopeful of a World Cup return. However, the selectors have instead gone with Andre Russell, who can perform a similar role in the side.

Peter Handscomb (Australia)

45 people are talking about this
With the return of Steve Smith, Peter Handscomb is the unfortunate man to miss out. The right-hander has been nothing but spectacular of late. In the 13 games he has played so far in 2019, he averages 43.54 with 479 runs, a total that includes three fifties and a hundred. With his exclusion, Australia are also without a back-up wicketkeeping option.

Akila Dananjaya (Sri Lanka)

Out of all the names that Sri Lanka left out, Akila Dananjaya's was the most surprising. Danajaya picked up 28 wickets last year at 23.00 in 15 innings and was their highest wicket-taker. Since returning to international cricket with a remodelled action, the mystery spinner has proved to be less effective, prompted the selectors to leave him out of Sri Lanka's 15-man list.

Mohammad Amir (Pakistan)

Amir may have been a leading force in Pakistan's successful 2017 ICC Champions Trophy campaign in England, but since then his numbers have only suffered. Earlier this month, skipper Sarfaraz Ahmed expressed concerns over Amir's form. The 27-year-old has gone wicketless in nine out of his last 14 ODIs and fitness issues in recent times have not helped his case either. Like his teammate Asif, he is in the 17-man squad for next months ODIs against England, so a chance to shine on the world stage might not be completely out of the question.

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/1197954
 
Not sure how Asif Ali makes that eleven. The lad barely survives more than 4 overs in a T20 game (never mind an ODI).
 
I didn't even realize Dickwella and Chandimal both didn't make it. That's bold from lanka
 
Not sure how Asif Ali makes that eleven. The lad barely survives more than 4 overs in a T20 game (never mind an ODI).

Do you know why Colin Munro made the WC squad for NZ?


4-25-2019 7-31-21 PM.jpg


Asif Ali: 153/8 = 19.12 balls per innings.
Munro: 827/38 = 21.76 balls per innings.

Asif hs much better S/R than Munro and 4 runs better average.
 
Do you know why Colin Munro made the WC squad for NZ?


View attachment 90770


Asif Ali: 153/8 = 19.12 balls per innings.
Munro: 827/38 = 21.76 balls per innings.

Asif hs much better S/R than Munro and 4 runs better average.

Munro is accomplished against much bigger teams if you take out the Zimbabwe series Asif has averaged 19.25 in the Asia cup and made 9 in the only game he played vs NZ. Not to mention in List A Munro averages 35 with an SR of 111 while Asif averages 28 with an SR of 109.
 
Ashton Turner and Liam Dawson were also pretty unlucky to miss out.

Not Sure about Liam Dawson but Ashton Turner was actually lucky to be even considered based on one freak innings. He hasn't done much at the highest level to be picked ahead of anyone in the Australian squad.
 
Not Sure about Liam Dawson but Ashton Turner was actually lucky to be even considered based on one freak innings. He hasn't done much at the highest level to be picked ahead of anyone in the Australian squad.

If Asif Ali has been picked based on 1 fifty against Zimbabwe C side, then Turner certainly deserves a go for a freakish innings against India A side. Nothing against Asif, as he is in incredibly difficult times atm and I pray for his family, but he certainly hasn't done anything to warrant a team in the Unlucky XI.

Dawson would make most of the teams with his set of skills and form.
 
Do you know why Colin Munro made the WC squad for NZ?


View attachment 90770


Asif Ali: 153/8 = 19.12 balls per innings.
Munro: 827/38 = 21.76 balls per innings.

Asif hs much better S/R than Munro and 4 runs better average.
As you know Munro is an opener, a half decent part time bowler and an excellent fielder.

What is Asif Ali? Cant bowl, cant field and a number 6 who can only be relied upon if the team is 250/4 leading into last 5 overs of an ODI.
 
As you know Munro is an opener, a half decent part time bowler and an excellent fielder.

What is Asif Ali? Cant bowl, cant field and a number 6 who can only be relied upon if the team is 250/4 leading into last 5 overs of an ODI.

So, it is OK for an opener to stay at the wicket for 21 balls & s/R of 109 but it is not OK for a #6 to stay at the wicket for 19 balls and 131 S/R?

If that is the case, then what would you say about this opener? Would you play him in your team..... since you don't mind Munro being selected for NZ. By the way, this opener is a very good bowler.
4-26-2019 8-01-35 PM.jpg


Munro bowls 10 balls per match on the average.
 
So, it is OK for an opener to stay at the wicket for 21 balls & s/R of 109 but it is not OK for a #6 to stay at the wicket for 19 balls and 131 S/R?

If that is the case, then what would you say about this opener? Would you play him in your team..... since you don't mind Munro being selected for NZ. By the way, this opener is a very good bowler.
View attachment 90799


Munro bowls 10 balls per match on the average.

Is there any statistical base to [MENTION=143916]CadPakFan[/MENTION] 's claim?
 
Prithvi Shaw
Manish Pandey
Shubhman Gill
Ambati Rayudu
Rishabh Pant
Suresh Raina
Krunal Pandya
Ravichandran Ashwin
Shardul Thakur
Khaleel Ahmed
Umesh Yadav

:inti
 
All pictures of Pakistan ODI games in recent times have Shinwari in them - think he is the unluckiest of all.
 
As you know Munro is an opener, a half decent part time bowler and an excellent fielder.

What is Asif Ali? Cant bowl, cant field and a number 6 who can only be relied upon if the team is 250/4 leading into last 5 overs of an ODI.

You've hit the nail on the head. What made the likes of Afridi and Razzaq legendary players was that in addition to their power hitting ability, they also bowled and did so well enough to be relied on as genuine bowlers. That then allowed Pakistan to play them at the allrounders spots of 7/8.

As Asif Ali can't bowl, he has to take the spot of.a genuine batsman, i.e. number 6. That's fine if the top 5 get you almost to the end with a decent score. If however Asif is required to come in at a time where the team needs him bat for 10 overs building a base before slogging, there are big question marks as to whether Asif can do that. That's because in all of our WC planning, we have never once tried sending Asif in at 4 or 5 to test his abilities. And unfortunately, it's now probably too late to do that testing.
 
All pictures of Pakistan ODI games in recent times have Shinwari in them - think he is the unluckiest of all.

Agreed. Hasnain is either going to be an inspired choice or a regretful decision. I really hope it's not the latter but if it is, Shinwari's exclusion is going to become a bigger talking point.
 
So, it is OK for an opener to stay at the wicket for 21 balls & s/R of 109 but it is not OK for a #6 to stay at the wicket for 19 balls and 131 S/R?

If that is the case, then what would you say about this opener? Would you play him in your team..... since you don't mind Munro being selected for NZ. By the way, this opener is a very good bowler.
View attachment 90799


Munro bowls 10 balls per match on the average.

If Asif Ali bowled he would have been a regular in the team.

No team plays a hitter solely as a batsman
 
So, it is OK for an opener to stay at the wicket for 21 balls & s/R of 109 but it is not OK for a #6 to stay at the wicket for 19 balls and 131 S/R?

If that is the case, then what would you say about this opener? Would you play him in your team..... since you don't mind Munro being selected for NZ. By the way, this opener is a very good bowler.
View attachment 90799


Munro bowls 10 balls per match on the average.
Ok so i will rest my case with the stat below. For me it is the biggest scam in the history of our cricket than Asif Ali made it to international cricket as a pure batsman.
7beb3e3914923f96d4f8b4efe7d7f798.jpg
c362a5e5398a75c55cf5f1e290f2a147.jpg
 
Last edited:
Sorry bro, I did not know we were talking about First Class batting. You win the debate! :)
 
You are welcome! :)

You must be a huge fan of Fawad Alam then?
Not necessarily a fan of him.

But at least he passes the first benchmark of doing well in domestic cricket.

If Fawad had any many chances as Asad Shafiq he would have cemented his place. Dont think Fawad is a match winner but he was treated rather unfairly because he didnt fit the coach/selector’s criteria.
 
Ok so i will rest my case with the stat below. For me it is the biggest scam in the history of our cricket than Asif Ali made it to international cricket as a pure batsman.
7beb3e3914923f96d4f8b4efe7d7f798.jpg
c362a5e5398a75c55cf5f1e290f2a147.jpg

Look at those stats. 98 strike rate at an average of 50+ in first class cricket. What a beast.
 
3 Pakistanis in the XI. This was bound to happen. The problem is ke talent bohot hai :inzi
 
Ok so i will rest my case with the stat below. For me it is the biggest scam in the history of our cricket than Asif Ali made it to international cricket as a pure batsman.
7beb3e3914923f96d4f8b4efe7d7f798.jpg
c362a5e5398a75c55cf5f1e290f2a147.jpg

By the way Babar used to avg in 20s in FC when he made his debut for Pakistan and he still averages in 20s if you take out test match stats.

However, irrespective of any stat everybody knows Babar is the best Pakistani batsman at the moment so its not all about FC stats in my opinion. Also 3 of our bowlers in WC havent even played 5 FC matches if we exclude tour games.

I am not comparing Asif Ali with anybody or saying he is extraordinary but just saying that FC stats dont necessarily represent the true current picture of the calibre of the batsman. 2 of Asif’s 3 list A centuries came last season if I am not wrong. Players improve, deteriorate along with time and exposure.

If you need a hitter and a guy hits 26 sixes in PSL (one of the highest number of sixes in any completed league around the globe last season) I dont mind seeing him if he serves the team plan.

Would have liked to see other hitters like Iftikhar Ahmed, Khushdil Shah also groomed in the last year or so but that didn’t happen.
 
By the way Babar used to avg in 20s in FC when he made his debut for Pakistan and he still averages in 20s if you take out test match stats.

However, irrespective of any stat everybody knows Babar is the best Pakistani batsman at the moment so its not all about FC stats in my opinion. Also 3 of our bowlers in WC havent even played 5 FC matches if we exclude tour games.

I am not comparing Asif Ali with anybody or saying he is extraordinary but just saying that FC stats dont necessarily represent the true current picture of the calibre of the batsman. 2 of Asif’s 3 list A centuries came last season if I am not wrong. Players improve, deteriorate along with time and exposure.

If you need a hitter and a guy hits 26 sixes in PSL (one of the highest number of sixes in any completed league around the globe last season) I dont mind seeing him if he serves the team plan.

Would have liked to see other hitters like Iftikhar Ahmed, Khushdil Shah also groomed in the last year or so but that didn’t happen.

I think, Babar's current FC average is 37.43 for almost 3K runs, and Test average is 35.28 for 1,235 runs .... which suggests excluding Test, his FC average will be close to 40.

Babar started Test career in OCT 2016, by that time his FC average actually was way more than 20 - this is his season by season FC record
http://www.pcboard.com.pk/Pakistan/Players/166/166944/f_Batting_by_Season.html

Before that Test debut, till ENG tour with PAK A, his FC stats was around 1500 runs @ 40 average. And, this is in a period when average FC innings in PAK domestics is around 170-200.

He debuted in ODI sometimes after 2015 WC (ZIM tour of PAK) - that time his FC average was relatively poor - still it was around 1,000+ runs @ 35. But, by that time (May 2015), when Babar was called for ODI, he had played 48 List A games .... for 2K+ runs @ 48 average
http://www.pcboard.com.pk/Pakistan/Players/166/166944/a_Batting_by_Season.html

Therefore, I am sure FC stats definitely is indicative!!!!. More on that, Asif has that sort of stats after almost a decade in FC cricket and it's almost impossible for his to improve his game at this age, even if I consider by some miracle Asif was born as 0 years old. On contrary, Babar was 20 years old at ODI debut - after almost a decade of investment from U13 cricket with plenty of time to develop.

If International cricket is regularly played on PSL size boundaries, then indeed he has a chance to contribute something with his slogging, International teams will force him to slog at mid-wicket's throat almost every time.

Power hitting is a flawed logic - Josh Butler or Andre Russel or Hardik Pandeya or Maxwell are power hitters not because they have muscle power, rather they have proper hitting technique - fast bat swing with high back lift, foot work to shift power on front foot, eye sight to judge the length quickly & get under the ball, great hand-eye to middle the ball from high back-lift - these are batting techniques, otherwise 5'3" and 125lbs Mushfique won't have cleared 85 metres Abu Dhabi boundary on one of the slowest & lowest tracks in world.

Asif Ali doesn't have the proper batting technique, hence after 1-2 hits, often he is worked out. No batsman without rotating technique can survive in ODIs; in T20s may be, because 7 ball 20 is a tremendous impact innings there. If he was 6 years younger, I would have suggested to start Wicket Keeping - a decent Keeping capability could have made him almost the MVP of this PAK side, but as a specialist bat, he is too risky investment.
 
So, it is OK for an opener to stay at the wicket for 21 balls & s/R of 109 but it is not OK for a #6 to stay at the wicket for 19 balls and 131 S/R?

If that is the case, then what would you say about this opener? Would you play him in your team..... since you don't mind Munro being selected for NZ. By the way, this opener is a very good bowler.
View attachment 90799


Munro bowls 10 balls per match on the average.

So you conveniently ignored the other posters's post which made it clear that if we take the Zimbabve series out, Asif Ali's already mediocre average drops to 19 which is shambolic territory. I dont know why you are even defending such a rubbish player.
 
Munro is accomplished against much bigger teams if you take out the Zimbabwe series Asif has averaged 19.25 in the Asia cup and made 9 in the only game he played vs NZ. Not to mention in List A Munro averages 35 with an SR of 111 while Asif averages 28 with an SR of 109.

The reason I am giving Asif's example because this is the ONLY power hitter selectors have found worthy of trying in the team. If selectors had tried 4-5 different power hitter (who could score like Razzaq and Afridi in last 5-10 overs) then I would have named one of them. Thanks to our selectors (for not trying any other player like him), I don't know if there any better/other choices in domestic cricket as I do not watch domestic cricket.

Again, Asif was used an example who can play instead of Malik - because selectors picked him, he is the only choice, the guy hit the highest number of sixes and he was picked up by CAPE TOWN BLITZ where he had 3rd highest S/R in the Mzansi Super League.

You have better choice than Asif who can play like Asif and has better credentials...and can replace Malik, I will support that player!



So you conveniently ignored the other posters's post which made it clear that if we take the Zimbabve series out, Asif Ali's already mediocre average drops to 19 which is shambolic territory. I dont know why you are even defending such a rubbish player.

Happy? :)

Peanut gallery is so hard to please these days! :P
 
The reason I am giving Asif's example because this is the ONLY power hitter selectors have found worthy of trying in the team. If selectors had tried 4-5 different power hitter (who could score like Razzaq and Afridi in last 5-10 overs) then I would have named one of them. Thanks to our selectors (for not trying any other player like him), I don't know if there any better/other choices in domestic cricket as I do not watch domestic cricket.

Again, Asif was used an example who can play instead of Malik - because selectors picked him, he is the only choice, the guy hit the highest number of sixes and he was picked up by CAPE TOWN BLITZ where he had 3rd highest S/R in the Mzansi Super League.

You have better choice than Asif who can play like Asif and has better credentials...and can replace Malik, I will support that player!





Happy? :)

Peanut gallery is so hard to please these days! :P

I guess you have a point we don't really have much of an option of a power hitter apart from Asif Ali other than Imad, and I guess since his daughter is sick that will put more fire in his belly to perform better.
 
The reason I am giving Asif's example because this is the ONLY power hitter selectors have found worthy of trying in the team. If selectors had tried 4-5 different power hitter (who could score like Razzaq and Afridi in last 5-10 overs) then I would have named one of them. Thanks to our selectors (for not trying any other player like him), I don't know if there any better/other choices in domestic cricket as I do not watch domestic cricket.

Again, Asif was used an example who can play instead of Malik - because selectors picked him, he is the only choice, the guy hit the highest number of sixes and he was picked up by CAPE TOWN BLITZ where he had 3rd highest S/R in the Mzansi Super League.

You have better choice than Asif who can play like Asif and has better credentials...and can replace Malik, I will support that player!





Happy? :)

Peanut gallery is so hard to please these days! :P

I guess you have a point we don't really have much of an option of a power hitter apart from Asif Ali other than Imad, and I guess since his daughter is sick that will put more fire in his belly to perform better.
I hate to say this but if we are really dying out there for options then Umar Akmal is a supremely better option than Asif ali.
 
For me wahab is pretty unlucky to miss out.He has been in great form.He is bowling quicker with brain and also looks stronger and fitter even shaoib akhtar in one of his interview admitted wahab should have been in the squad he said that wahab is bowling the best he ever saw him bowl.Asif Ali's name should not be there.As far as Rizwan is concerned he definitely should have been in the team instead of mr.captain useless who doesn't make team on merit.
 
I hate to say this but if we are really dying out there for options then Umar Akmal is a supremely better option than Asif ali.

I wanted both Asif and Umar in the team.
 
For me wahab is pretty unlucky to miss out.He has been in great form.He is bowling quicker with brain and also looks stronger and fitter even shaoib akhtar in one of his interview admitted wahab should have been in the squad he said that wahab is bowling the best he ever saw him bowl.Asif Ali's name should not be there.As far as Rizwan is concerned he definitely should have been in the team instead of mr.captain useless who doesn't make team on merit.

He gone.

His career gone.

He done.

Time for retirement.

/end verse
 
I hate to say this but if we are really dying out there for options then Umar Akmal is a supremely better option than Asif ali.

Umar Akmal isn't in the England series so I doubt Umar Akmal will be in the team for the World cup so I am only going over available options. Plus he is a TTF
 
As you know Munro is an opener, a half decent part time bowler and an excellent fielder.

What is Asif Ali? Cant bowl, cant field and a number 6 who can only be relied upon if the team is 250/4 leading into last 5 overs of an ODI.

If Asif Ali bowled he would have been a regular in the team.

No team plays a hitter solely as a batsman

So you conveniently ignored the other posters's post which made it clear that if we take the Zimbabve series out, Asif Ali's already mediocre average drops to 19 which is shambolic territory. I dont know why you are even defending such a rubbish player.


Ok so i will rest my case with the stat below. For me it is the biggest scam in the history of our cricket than Asif Ali made it to international cricket as a pure batsman.

Any change of minds here?
But I guess, most important change of mind will be of Inzimam to include Asif in the WC squad!
 
Any change of minds here?
But I guess, most important change of mind will be of Inzimam to include Asif in the WC squad!

A little.

Considering how England are playing and how Asif Ali is hyped... We will need Asif to score more than 50.
 
A little.

Considering how England are playing and how Asif Ali is hyped... We will need Asif to score more than 50.
But if you don't have him the team, you will not even see those types of 50s! :)
 
Back
Top