What's new

David Cameron returns as UK foreign secretary

Shayan

ODI Debutant
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Runs
12,742
PRIME MINISTER David Cameron has announced he is to resign, within hours of the UK public choosing to vote to leave the European Union.

Speaking outside Downing Street, Mr Cameron said: "There can be no doubt about the result.

"I would reassure those markets and investors that Britain's economy is fundamentally strong."

Saying "we have to confront big decisions not duck them", he added: "This will require strong and committed leadership.

"I think the country requires fresh leadership.

"I do not think it would be right for me to be the captain that steers the country to its next direction."

"We should aim to have a new Prime Minister in place by October."
 
Last edited:
Inevitable.

Really, it's incredible that he won last year's election.

But the gamble on a referendum as the price for the support of the Lunatic Right Fringe of our party has backfired. He got 16 months more in power, but he lost Scotland from the UK even though it had only just voted against independence.

What kind of legacy is that? The man who broke up the UK.
 
Inevitable.

Really, it's incredible that he won last year's election.

But the gamble on a referendum as the price for the support of the Lunatic Right Fringe of our party has backfired. He got 16 months more in power, but he lost Scotland from the UK even though it had only just voted against independence.

What kind of legacy is that? The man who broke up the UK.

Its music to someone with colonial hangover!
 
Even Rameez Raja is tweeting about this, in typical Rameezian manner:

@iramizraja "David Cameron exits 10 Downing Street with head held high.. What leadership, fought for his beliefs to the last with desperate valour.."
 
Inevitable.

Really, it's incredible that he won last year's election.

But the gamble on a referendum as the price for the support of the Lunatic Right Fringe of our party has backfired. He got 16 months more in power, but he lost Scotland from the UK even though it had only just voted against independence.

What kind of legacy is that? The man who broke up the UK.

Atleast had the guts to come true on his electoral promise of referendum and as for legacy- it would be abided by his nation's wish and votes- both on the call for the referendum and accepting the results.

Its not Cameron's whos broken up the nation, its the citizens who broke it up- Cameron acted on his mandate.
 
Atleast had the guts to come true on his electoral promise of referendum and as for legacy- it would be abided by his nation's wish and votes- both on the call for the referendum and accepting the results.

Its not Cameron's whos broken up the nation, its the citizens who broke it up- Cameron acted on his mandate.

Agree with this.

Put the referendum aside He has been a very good leader - and has done wonders for the UK in balancing the books since the labour debacle.

It is a real shame that he showed poor leadership during the campaign by ramping up the negative scaremongering rhetoric......He really wouldn't need to go had he not done that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Atleast had the guts to come true on his electoral promise of referendum and as for legacy- it would be abided by his nation's wish and votes- both on the call for the referendum and accepting the results.

Its not Cameron's whos broken up the nation, its the citizens who broke it up- Cameron acted on his mandate.

It's Cameron who promised a referendum in order to attract right wing voters. He could have seen the writing on the wall - that his time is over - and not made such a stupid promise to retain power.

Definitely his legacy.
 
It's Cameron who promised a referendum in order to attract right wing voters. He could have seen the writing on the wall - that his time is over - and not made such a stupid promise to retain power.

Definitely his legacy.

60% of England outside of London voted to leave.
 
It's Cameron who promised a referendum in order to attract right wing voters. He could have seen the writing on the wall - that his time is over - and not made such a stupid promise to retain power.

Definitely his legacy.

Else would have ended up with a fractured parliament- put it this way had Cameron not promised the referendum the Exiters would have voted for UKIP, and no clear majority govt- and potentially no referendum.

Or a man of less principles and morals would have made the promise and then done nothing about it- something our South Asian leaders are quite good at.
 
Cameron was the prime minister of the United Kingdoms (probably one of the last), not England.

You say one of the last prime ministers of the UK, now if the UK doesnt want to remain United, is it fault of the Prime Minister?

Or we want to elect leaders who dont listen to their electorate- and totally out of tune with the what the citizens want? Sounds a bit like from the Brexit hymnsheet.

Chap did what his countrymen had been demanding for- a vote on EU.
 
Else would have ended up with a fractured parliament- put it this way had Cameron not promised the referendum the Exiters would have voted for UKIP, and no clear majority govt- and potentially no referendum.

Or a man of less principles and morals would have made the promise and then done nothing about it- something our South Asian leaders are quite good at.

Labor got more votes than Tories and would have formed the government had Cameron not promised Brexit referendum to right wingers.
 
Even Rameez Raja is tweeting about this, in typical Rameezian manner:

@iramizraja "David Cameron exits 10 Downing Street with head held high.. What leadership, fought for his beliefs to the last with desperate valour.."

Typical brown nosing patter from Rameez.
 
Irrelevant for Cameron's referendum as they didn't vote for him.
But they wouldn't have had the option to vote in the referendum if not for Cameron.

So he is their messiah in disguise. Pretty relevant
Labour didn't want Cameron but wanted his referendum
 
But they wouldn't have had the option to vote in the referendum if not for Cameron.

So he is their messiah in disguise. Pretty relevant
Labour didn't want Cameron but wanted his referendum

But Cameron didn't want UK to leave Europe, he promised a referendum for the votes of the right-wing. What Labour voters want or don't want didn't change his decision.
 
But Cameron didn't want UK to leave Europe, he promised a referendum for the votes of the right-wing. What Labour voters want or don't want didn't change his decision.

What he wanted or didnt want is irrelevant- coz if he really didnt want UK to leave Europe he wouldnt have provided the Brits the tools to trigger the process- could have just delayed it for another 4 years, retired and left it as some one else's problem be it Labour or Tories or LibDem/Greens/UKIP.

He delivered on what he promised in his manifesto- thats what matters. Refreshing to see a politico sticking to what he promised.
 
What he wanted or didnt want is irrelevant- coz if he really didnt want UK to leave Europe he wouldnt have provided the Brits the tools to trigger the process- could have just delayed it for another 4 years, retired and left it as some one else's problem be it Labour or Tories or LibDem/Greens/UKIP.

He delivered on what he promised in his manifesto- thats what matters. Refreshing to see a politico sticking to what he promised.

Agree - and for him it turned out to be career suicide. you live by the sword you die by the sword.

Its a shame cause I rated the guy highly (other than his referendum rhetoric).
 
UK opens probe into Greensill lobbying by ex-PM Cameron

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-greensill-cameron/uk-opens-probe-into-greensill-lobbying-by-ex-pm-cameron-idUSKBN2BZ184?il=0

Britain’s government has opened an independent investigation into failed finance company Greensill Capital after lobbying by former Prime Minister David Cameron raised questions over its access to ministers. Australian banker Lex Greensill was brought in as an adviser to the government while Cameron was British prime minister from 2010 to 2016. After leaving office, Cameron in turn became an adviser to Greensill’s now-insolvent company.

The Financial Times and Sunday Times newspapers have reported that Cameron contacted ministers directly to lobby on behalf of Greensill Capital, including sending text messages to finance minister Rishi Sunak and arranging a private drink between Greensill and Health Secretary Matt Hancock.

Cameron, in his first comments on his actions on Sunday, said he had not broken any rules, but that he accepted his communication with government should be completely formal.

Britain’s Treasury has said Cameron contacted Sunak and two other ministers in the department to ask if Greensill could have access to the government’s COVID-19 loan schemes at the start of the pandemic. Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s spokesman said Johnson understood the “significant interest” in the matter and wanted to start the review to “ensure government is completely transparent about such activities”.

The review will be led by Nigel Boardman, a partner at law firm Slaughter and May, and will report to Johnson by the end of May. Boardman will step aside from his role as a non-executive director at Britain’s business ministry during his investigation.

“The Prime Minister has asked Mr Boardman to conduct a review that will look into the decisions taken around the development and use of supply chain finance (and associated schemes) in government, especially the role of Lex Greensill and Greensill Capital,” the government said.

Johnson’s spokesman added that the review “will also look at how contracts were secured and business representatives engaged with government”. Cameron said that in his representations to government he did not break any codes of conduct or government rules.

Ultimately the outcome of the discussions on Greensill’s proposals on a loan were not taken up, he said, and therefore his interventions did not lead to a change in the government’s approach.

“However, I have reflected on this at length,” he said in a statement to the Press Association news agency.

“There are important lessons to be learnt. As a former prime minister, I accept that communications with government need to be done through only the most formal of channels, so there can be no room for misinterpretation.”
 
Greensill: Labour urges 'full' probe into Cameron lobbying

Boris Johnson must launch a "full" inquiry into David Cameron's attempts to lobby ministers on behalf of a finance firm, Labour has said.

The ex-prime minister's work for Greensill Capital has been heavily criticised, with a government-backed investigation set up.

Mr Johnson said this would have "carte blanche" to "ask anybody" the questions that needed to be answered.

But Labour said the probe had "all the hallmarks of a Conservative cover-up".

Mr Cameron, who started work for Greensill Capital in 2018 - two years after leaving Downing Street - contacted several ministers on its behalf, including Chancellor Rishi Sunak.

The contacts related to government loans during the pandemic.

Mr Cameron has said he did not break any codes of conduct or rules on lobbying - attempts to influence government policy - and that he welcomes the investigation launched by Mr Johnson.

Lawyer Nigel Boardman will step aside from his government job to lead the review, focusing on the government's use of supply-chain finance, a technique in which Greensill Capital specialised.

A Cabinet Office spokesperson said it would look "especially" at the role played in government by the company, and its founder Alexander "Lex" Greensill, who gave Mr Cameron a job after he had left office.

The review will not have legal powers and is understood to be likely to produce "findings" rather than recommendations. It will report back to the PM in June.

Instead of this, Labour wants 16 MPs from different parties to form a special committee and spend eight months examining Mr Cameron's contact with government, and wider rules on lobbying.

The party plans to use a Commons debate on Wednesday to force a vote on the issue.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-56730447
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/former-uk-pm-cameron-had-extensive-contact-with-senior-ministers-over-greensill-2021-05-11/

Former British Prime Minister David Cameron repeatedly contacted senior ministers over a four-month period in 2020 to lobby for the now-failed, supply-chain finance firm Greensill Capital, according to documents published on Tuesday.

The communications included texts, WhatsApp messages and telephone calls to finance minister Rishi Sunak, cabinet office minister Michael Gove and health minister Matt Hancock, documents provided by Cameron to parliament's Treasury Committee showed.

"Am sure goodwill and common sense can fix this. In the end substance is what matters (help for SMEs) - the form can always be sorted," one message from Cameron to Sunak said.

Cameron was lobbying the government to allow Greensill, founded by Australian banker Lex Greensill in 2011, to access a COVID-19 loan scheme.

Lex Greensill was brought in as an adviser to the government while Cameron was British prime minister from 2010 to 2016.

After leaving office, Cameron in turn became an adviser to Greensill Capital, which filed for insolvency protection in March.

Cameron has denied breaking any code of conduct or government rules and the government has repeatedly said the outcome of his discussions on Greensill's proposals for access to a COVID-19 loan scheme were not taken up.

The Bank of England said in April that no changes were made to the Covid Corporate Financing Facility as a result of communication between Cameron and Bank officials.

The data release showed Cameron contacted six different ministers and a similar number of government and Bank of England officials. The messages ranged from arranging calls to listing the merits of Greensill's business.

In later messages, Cameron expressed frustration at not getting agreement from the treasury and the bank.

"Again Greensill have got a 'no'. Am genuinely baffled ... This seems bonkers. Am now calling CX, Gove, everyone. Best wishes. Dc," Cameron wrote to top finance ministry official Tom Scholar on April 3. 'CX' refers to Sunak.

The Treasury Committee will interview Lex Greensill later on Tuesday and Cameron on Thursday for its inquiry into Greensill Capital.
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-former-pm-cameron-says-it-is-painful-face-greensill-inquiry-2021-05-13/

David Cameron, the former British Prime Minister, said on Thursday he was not motivated by his own financial interest when he lobbied government on behalf of the now-collapsed supply chain finance firm Greensill Capital.

Although Cameron's extensive lobbying efforts did not result in policy changes, they have raised questions about the extent to which former British leaders can or should use their status to try to influence government policy.

Cameron declined to say how much he was paid by Greensill, or how much he would have made from shares he owned if the business had prospered, but said he had "a big economic investment" in its future and wanted the business to succeed.

"I was paid an annual amount, a generous annual amount, far more than I earned as prime minister," he told the House of Commons' Treasury Committee.

When he left office in 2016, Cameron was entitled to a salary of just over 150,000 pounds ($210,570).

Asked if it was fear of losing out on financial gains that motivated him to contact ministers, Cameron said: "That is not what I felt at the time, and it is not what motivated me."

He said he was motivated by, and believed in, Greensill's ability to help other businesses and the country during the early stages of the pandemic.

Cameron repeatedly contacted senior ministers over a four-month period in 2020 to lobby for Greensill, which filed for insolvency protection in March, documents published on Tuesday showed. read more

He said he thought his use of SMS and WhatsApp messages was appropriate given the severity of the COVID-19 crisis, but that different rules could apply in the future.

"One of the lessons I take away is ex-prime ministers should only ever use letter or email, and should restrict themselves far more," he said.

Cameron, who was Britain's prime minister between 2010 and 2016, said it was difficult for him to have to face parliamentary scrutiny over Greensill's collapse.

"This is a painful day coming back to a place that I love and respect so much, albeit virtually, but in these circumstances," he said.

"Lobbying itself is a necessary and healthy part of our democratic process, but I accept that there's a strong argument that having a former prime minister, engage on behalf of any commercial interest, no matter how laudable the motives and cause, can be open to misinterpretation," he said.

Cameron was lobbying the government to allow Greensill, founded by Australian banker Lex Greensill in 2011, to access a COVID-19 financing scheme.

The Bank of England said in April that no changes were made to the Covid Corporate Financing Facility as a result of communication between Cameron and Bank officials.

Cameron told a committee investigation into the firm's collapse and its interactions with government, that he had not been hired by Greensill as a lobbyist, but the situation changed at the start of the pandemic.

At the time he was lobbying ministers, Cameron said he had no sense that Greensill was in difficulty.

"I did not believe in March or April, when I was doing this contact, that there was a risk of Greensill falling over," he said.

Cameron stepped down as prime minister in 2016 after he unexpectedly lost a referendum on whether Britain should remain in the European Union.
 
David Cameron has been appointed as foreign secretary in a cabinet reshuffle.

The former prime minister, who was given the role while in Number 10 this morning, said he "gladly accepted" the offer from Rishi Sunak, despite having "disagreed with some individual decisions" by his successor.
 
Perhaps the best Conservative PM.

Is this a return to politics and possible leadership role for him?
 
David Cameron's appointment as Britain's new foreign secretary has the potential to breathe new life into the China-UK relationship which has in recent years experienced some serious setbacks. But because of the continuous internal political fighting within the ruling Tory party, it is also possible that China will become the focus of negative attention from critics who will use his unique understanding of China to attack him.

As a former British prime minister whose administration focused positively on fostering closer and mutually beneficial ties with Beijing, he is well positioned to engage with a country he came to comprehend well during his time in Downing Street.

The connections go back at least a decade. In 2013, he was part of a UK business delegation which returned from China with multi-billion-dollar worth of trade deals in its pockets. The following year, Cameron hosted the then Chinese premier Li Keqiang on a visit to London. In October 2015, he welcomed President Xi Jinping during a highly successful state visit, during which the two statesmen bonded at a visit to Cameron's grand official country residence, Chequers. They also enjoyed a pint of beer and fish and chips at The Plough pub in the nearby hamlet of Gadsden, South Buckinghamshire. Cameron returned to Beijing in 2017 to reinforce links between the two nations, followed by another visit a year later.

It was, as has been well-publicized, the dawn of a "golden era" of warm relations between China and the UK. Or it could have been, had it lasted. Unfortunately, it didn't, partly due to the malign influence of Washington, which did not like an ally forming closer ties with China. Additionally, a Sino-phobic hard right-wing element within the UK's ruling Tory party, which ideologically deplores China's communist system, played a role in derailing the relationship. They view any engagement with China as a sign of weakness, or even treachery.

Now that Cameron, who led the UK between 2010 and 2016, has returned to frontline politics it is reasonable to speculate whether the warm relations will get back on track.

As Cameron is now Britain's top diplomat - now to be officially known as Lord Cameron - he will have the wars in Gaza and Ukraine high on his agenda. However, in the longer term, dealing with China will take up a great deal of his time. During the period between his previous public role and now, the UK's relationship with Beijing has deteriorated. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has spun so often and so rapidly between pragmatic engagement with Beijing and demonization of Beijing, leaving uncertainty about his stance.

From being someone who, as chancellor, sought to develop trade links in a spirit of "pragmatic engagement," pushed to improve business relationships and was behind a drive to re-establish the UK-China Economic and Financial Dialogue in 2021, he became someone who, as prime minister, said the golden era was over and that it was "naive" to seek closer economic links. It was all part of pandering to his party's influential hard right. In July 2022, while seeking his party's leadership - and seeking to garner the support of the reactionary right - Sunak said China was Britain's "biggest long-term threat" and pledged to shut all of Britain's 30 Confucius institutes (though this was later quietly dropped) to reign in its soft power.

By contrast, Cameron in 2013 declared after meeting with Xi: "I told President Xi Jinping the rise of China would be a defining fact of the 21st century." Sunak would have been aware of this when he appointed Cameron this week, and it would be good for the UK if London were to once again aspire to be Beijing's partner.

Cameron has a lot to build on. He has vast experience on which to fall back on, but he has also retained an interest, and involvement, in geopolitical affairs in the region in a personal capacity since leaving office. Furthermore, his predecessor James Cleverly laid the foundations for an improved relationship during a visit to China in August. Although his approach was clumsy and at time contradictory, it was a tentative first step toward thawing the frosty diplomatic atmosphere between the two countries and developing a productive rapport. He spoke of the need for a constructive relationship. This is a path which is sure to antagonize Washington, as the UK seeks engagement with China. It will also provoke the usual China hawks within the Conservative Party who will use Cameron's close China links against him, reinforcing damaging stereotypes to attack China in the process.

These attacks should be expected, and are as predictable as day following night. However, the gains from closer relations between Beijing and London will far outweigh the losses represented by noisy critics.

Source: Global Times

 
Perhaps the best Conservative PM.

Is this a return to politics and possible leadership role for him?
It's a desperate attempt to keep a flailing Conservative party together. Sunak fears backlash after firing Suella and will accept help from any corner. It's an absolute mess. It will be an important case study charting the UK's economy over the coming 4-5 years.

That said I really like how things are coming a full circle, Karma et all. Churchill's conviction that the colonies were incapable of governing themselves being inferior peoples and that it was the duty of Anglo-Saxon superiority to rule over them. Touché!
 
It's a desperate attempt to keep a flailing Conservative party together. Sunak fears backlash after firing Suella and will accept help from any corner. It's an absolute mess. It will be an important case study charting the UK's economy over the coming 4-5 years.

That said I really like how things are coming a full circle, Karma et all. Churchill's conviction that the colonies were incapable of governing themselves being inferior peoples and that it was the duty of Anglo-Saxon superiority to rule over them. Touché!
Cameron might be the next PM
 
Back
Top