Did Jinnah die too soon, not fully sharing his vision to his successors?

[Snak3eye5]

Ive allways wondered had Jinnah not died too soon , i think allmost a year after paritiion would pakistan have taken a different route to ensure that it would have become a sucessful country akin to what US is today, a global super power. Pakistan had everything going for it, an abundance of natural resources,one of the best fertile lands in the world and robust irrigation systems, fewer citizens to manage unlike China/India. Ive heard the muslims who moved into pakistan were mostly wealthier and better educated compared to the poor muslims who stayed back in India. Pakistan also had the support of USA. Allways wonder if Jinnah stayed, would the decisions he made would have inturn taken Pakistan to a different path, Islam or democracy, security or welfare, education or defense.

 

[R0H1T]

No, if you look at the replies of blasphemy supporters on this forum itself you'll know why it'd never happen. Pak could've forged its own destiny rejected dictators like AYUB, Yahya, Zia or Musharraf yet they didn't go down that road. The people on the western front let the 1971 genocide go unchecked, they did nothing & as they say ~ For you sow the wind & you shall reap the whirlwind.

A lot of tragedies, including the two partitions, were avoidable & so Ind/Pak face the consequences. More for Pak than India but that makes no one happy, not me as an Indian & certainly not as another human being.