What's new

Ditch political correctness, nail Pakistani Muslims for crimes they commit in UK, says ex-aid worker

hafeezrocks

Local Club Star
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Runs
2,163
A former aid worker in Afghanistan and Pakistan has said that in Pakistan there is a widespread cultural attitude that non-Muslims are inferior to Muslims, and therefore, it comes as no surprise that the latter gets the license to commit heinous crimes against the former without fear of being punished.

Suggesting it is time to call a spade a spade, ditch political correctness and recognize that there is a need to tackle what is a ?safeguarding issue at home and a foreign policy issue overseas?, Dr. Martin Parsons has endorsed Labour Member of Parliament from Rotherham Sarah Champion?s call to deal with British Pakistanis grooming young white girls for sex firmly as per the law of the land.

Welcoming the conviction of 17 British Pakistanis on rape-related charges, Dr. Parsons has, in an article written for and published by the conservativehome.com website, said that having lived in Pakistan for a while, he has concluded that a high proportion of children abducted and abused are from the country?s Christian and Hindu minorities and are regarded as inferiors by the majority Muslim community.

?In fact, most abductions occur in the Punjab and Sindh province, where the majority of the Christians and Hindus respectively live. A 2014 report by a Pakistani NGO highlighted how these abductions are justified by forcing the victims to convert to Islam, which then enables the perpetrator to escape justice,? he says.

?The prevalence and incidence of forced conversion and marriage are difficult to accurately estimate due to reporting deficiencies and the complex nature of the crime. Estimates therefore range from 100 to 700 victim Christian girls per year. For the Hindu community, the most conservative estimates put the number of victims at 300 per year,? he adds.
Dr. Parsons recalls that last November, the Sindh provincial assembly unanimously passed a bill prohibiting ?forced conversion?, but this was withdrawn in January after the Council on Islamic Ideology in Pakistan put pressure on it on grounds that the law was ?un-Islamic?.

He says that in Pakistan, in the textbooks of classical Islam, such as the Hedaya taught in madrassas, Christians are referred to as ?Dhimmis? or ?inferiors? who are allowed to live in Pakistan provided they are subservient to Muslims. Hindus, on the other hand, are not even given this status, and it is specifically stated that the evidence of neither is accepted against a Muslim.

http://www.dnaindia.com/world/repor...-they-commit-in-uk-says-ex-aid-worker-2527696

Not sure whether he is correct about the attitude towards Non-Muslim back home in Pakistan or how it could have influence over 3rd Generation Brit Pakistanis.

I don't think there has ever been a case of Muslim Gangs grooming Non-Muslim girls even in Pakistan.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Pakistani culture was a problem these acts would be rampant among Pakistanis in North America too. But as that's not in the case this problem is exclusive to UK only. And even in UK, it's more of a problem within a sub-culture of larger Pakistani community.
 
The real problem lies in Muslims taking their religion from scholars or imams, and not educating themselves in the language of the Qur'an or the history of early Muslims.

Christians (and Jews) are Ahl-al-Kitaab, People of The Book, and worthy of respect. As Muslims are prohibited from mocking the beliefs and gods of others, Hindus too, therefore are worthy of respect.

Dhimmis are those the State takes responsibility for - hence the word 'Dhimmidar' or 'one who is responsible', 'fulfils responsibility' - they may be minorities, like Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and so on, or any other minority group. The point is, that the State has an absolute responsibility to protect, defend and guard minorities, their residences and places of business/worship.

Regrettably, ignorance - jahaalat - has become widespread amongst Muslims, this is why few understand the Qur'an or Islam, and thus, have constant recourse to scholars to interpret, explain everything to them.
 
If Pakistani culture was a problem these acts would be rampant among Pakistanis in North America too. But as that's not in the case this problem is exclusive to UK only. And even in UK, it's more of a problem within a sub-culture of larger Pakistani community.

That 'sub-culture' is composed of people from hamlets and villages, devoid of schools, colleges, universities, clinics or hospitals, where poverty - and therefore illiteracy and ignorance - is widespread. When they arrive in the West, or UK, they do so for money, not education, and make enough to build mansions - not schools or clinics - in their villages. They are very materialistic, regard white girls as 'cheap' and therefore, fair game.

I think the US and Australia allowed better off or educated Pakistanis to migrate, so perhaps that explains why the issues o problems that exist in the UK have not arisen elsewhere. Wa Llahu 'Alam.
 
They were mostly Bangladeshis, and one was an Indian Hindu. Indian media strikes again.

Also the Huddersfield and Aylesbury grooming gangs ringleaders where both Indians.

Didn't get much press though.
 
The real problem is that most Muslim's don't understand the message of the Qur'an. They commit these crimes out of ignorance. Islam like always is an innocent victim.
 
That 'sub-culture' is composed of people from hamlets and villages, devoid of schools, colleges, universities, clinics or hospitals, where poverty - and therefore illiteracy and ignorance - is widespread. When they arrive in the West, or UK, they do so for money, not education, and make enough to build mansions - not schools or clinics - in their villages. They are very materialistic, regard white girls as 'cheap' and therefore, fair game.

I think the US and Australia allowed better off or educated Pakistanis to migrate, so perhaps that explains why the issues o problems that exist in the UK have not arisen elsewhere. Wa Llahu 'Alam.

Agree, the UK shouldn't have allowed mass migrations from backward region like they did in the 50-60s, without taking any criteria into consideration.
 
Agree, the UK shouldn't have allowed mass migrations from backward region like they did in the 50-60s, without taking any criteria into consideration.

But, many lied to get into the country. My Parents were often shocked at the lengths Pakistanis, Bangalis went to in order to gain entry into the UK. There is one instance I particularly recall, because after it happened my Father refused to speak to this Pakistani man - he claimed his daughter was his wife, so the authorities had no choice but to let her in. Thank God the government are much tougher, and demand proofs before they allow people into the country.
 
But, many lied to get into the country. My Parents were often shocked at the lengths Pakistanis, Bangalis went to in order to gain entry into the UK. There is one instance I particularly recall, because after it happened my Father refused to speak to this Pakistani man - he claimed his daughter was his wife, so the authorities had no choice but to let her in. Thank God the government are much tougher, and demand proofs before they allow people into the country.

Now they come via the Asylum method claiming they are Mirzai, Gay Christian, Lesbian etc etc
 
Now they come via the Asylum method claiming they are Mirzai, Gay Christian, Lesbian etc etc



Disgusting, but true. My thread poses that question: what is the purpose of migration, and why do Pakistanis/Indians migrate?
 
Back
Top