'East Pakistan Debacle was a Political Failure': COAS Qamar Javed Bajwa

[daytrader]

East Pakistan’s dismemberment

Commenting on the Dhakka debacle in 1971, the army chief said he intended to discuss the topic that people usually avoid, which related to the surrender of the troops in the former East Pakistan in 1971.

He said: “I want to correct the record. First of all, the fall of East Pakistan, was not a military but a political failure. The number of fighting soldiers was not 92,000, it was rather only 34,000, the rest were from various government departments.”

He said these 34,000 people fought 250,000 Indian army soldiers, and 200,000 trained Mukti Bahini fighters but still they fought valiantly despite all odds and offered unprecedented sacrifices.

He said the sacrifices of the soldiers who fought in East Pakistan were not recognised in the country, which was a great injustice.


DAWN

 

[shortbread]

May as well kept his mouth shut rather than add fire to the debate, he isn't convincing anyone.

 

[umerz]

Who was leading the political front since mid 50s to early 70s?

 

[BunnyRabbit]

And tragically Ayub and Yahya were the two political rulers for good 14 years leading up to that tipping point.

 

[Varun]

I hope Pakistanis realize now that India is not their biggest enemy. Their is a far more sinister foe who is the devil they don't get to know much.

 

[sweep_shot]

I personally think creation of Bangladesh was un-Islamic (possibly violated Sahih Muslim 1836 and Sahih Bukhari 2955).

However, Pakistani establishment alienated East Pakistanis at times. So, I agree with Bajwa that it was a political failure rather than a military failure.

Also, Indian interference added fuel to the fire.

 

[Ahmad-GERMANFC]

I personally think creation of Bangladesh was un-Islamic (possibly violated Sahih Muslim 1836 and Sahih Bukhari 2955).

However, Pakistani establishment alienated East Pakistanis at times. So, I agree with Bajwa that it was a political failure rather than a military failure.

Also, Indian interference added fuel to the fire.

The military was ruling politics at the time. So even if political failure it was a political failure by the army

 

[Cricket-lion]

What is Gen Bajwa trying to achieve with this statement? He should think about his retirement plans now, he had many years to serve. It is a miscalculated statement at the wrong time.

Bangladesh was created as the peoples political will was neglected. I thought the army learnt from this. The people have.

Even now, a government is in place in Pakistan that does not represent the will of the people. Hopefully, sanity prevails sooner then later.

 

[daytrader]

Bilawal disputes ‘political failure’ narrative on 1971 debacle

KARACHI: Exactly a week after former army chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa referred to the East Pakistan loss as a ‘political’ failure, Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari in a thinly-veiled rejection of the claim insisted on Wednesday that the Dhaka debacle in 1971 was in fact a ‘military failure’ that had brought host of challenges for the Zulfikar Ali Bhutto-led PPP.

The foreign minister expressed this opinion at the Nishtar Park rally, which was organised to mark the 55th foundation day of his party as part of countrywide celebrations.

On the occasion, the PPP chairman revisited the history of his party and recounted the achievements of its founder. He referred to the fall of Dhaka in 1971, when his grandfather took up the challenge to reunite the “disintegrated country” and “regain the lost glory”.

“When Zulfikar Ali Bhutto took over the government, the people were broken and had lost all hope,” he said. “But he rebuilt the nation, restored the confidence of the people and finally brought our 90,000 troops back home who had been made prisoners of war due to ‘military failure’. Those 90,000 soldiers were reunited with their families. And that all was made possible due to politics of hope... of unity... and inclusion.”

While addressing a Defence and Martyrs Ceremony at the General Headquarters last week, former army chief retired Gen Qamar Bajwa — in an attempt to “correct the record” — had made the claim: “I want to correct the record. First of all, the fall of East Pakistan was not a military but a political failure. The number of fighting soldiers was not 92,000, it was rather only 34,000, the rest were from various government departments.”

He had said those 34,000 people fought 250,000 Indian army soldiers, and 200,000 trained Mukti Bahini fighters but still they fought valiantly despite all odds and offered unprecedented sacrifices.

In an over hour-long speech, the foreign minister recalled the history of his party that he said “sacrificed” two elected prime ministers. Even their family members were not spared and slain in an att*empt to weaken democracy and stren*gthen the “puppet leadership”, he said.

Taking a jibe at Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) chairman, the PPP chief said that contrary to Imran Khan’s claim, the PTI would never quit the assemblies of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab, as it had a history of taking “U-turns” and that too for the vested interests.

“Mark my words! they would never resign from the KP and Punjab assemblies,” reiterated Mr Bhutto-Zardari. “They have a history of such fraud. They resigned from the National Assembly and when their resignations were accepted by the Speaker [of the National Assembly], they approached the court to stop him from doing so.”

DAWN