What's new

England [208/9] beat Australia [205] by 1 wicket in the 5th ODI to seal 5-0 whitewash

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,934
Overview

England v Australia
Old Trafford, Manchester
5th ODI
Sunday 24 June; 10:00 GMT, 11:00 local

A five-match series, whatever the format, gives everyone a good idea of what the contesting teams can and cannot do. At the moment, with just one game to go in the one-day international series between England and Australia, the verdict seems quite clear: England are the team to beat in ODI cricket, and Australia have some distance to go to catch up with their old rivals.

It’s 4-0 to England, and looking at the way the four games have gone, 5-0 seems a distinct possibility.

But the fact that Australia’s poor run has coincided with the absence of five of their stalwarts – Steve Smith and David Warner in the batting department and Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins and Josh Hazlewood with the ball – isn’t lost on anyone.

Aaron Finch and Shaun Marsh are Australia's mainstays with the bat Aaron Finch and Shaun Marsh are Australia's mainstays with the bat

This was Australia’s first international outing since the Cape Town crisis, under new coach Justin Langer, and it hasn’t gone well at all. Each of England’s wins has been comprehensive.

Australia might have felt they were in the game the first time out, scoring 214 and then picking up seven wickets before England overhauled the target, but the home side always had the target in their sights. After that, it has been one-way traffic. England put up 342/8 and then the world-record 481/6 in the next two games, winning by 38 and 242 runs respectively, while the last game was also one-sided, with the chase of 311 pulled off with 32 balls in hand.

To be fair to Australia, though they haven’t always batted as a team, individuals have put in strong efforts – Shaun Marsh most of all, with a battling 131 in the second game and 101 in the fourth, when Aaron Finch also scored 100.

It’s not easy to beat this England side in the big-bashing game, so Australia would have hoped for better performances from their inexperienced bowling unit. All their bowlers, bar Nathan Lyon in his only outing and Ashton Agar, have gone for plenty, forcing a fair bit of chopping and changing. As a result, the English batsmen have had a ball.

Moeen Ali and Adil Rashid have picked up 19 wickets between them at fantastic economy rates Moeen Ali and Adil Rashid have picked up 19 wickets between them at fantastic economy rates

The series has been decided by the batsmen, the English batsmen, that is, and a look at the scorers’ chart shows how. With a set top six – though Eoin Morgan, the captain, missed the second game due to injury – everyone has gone about their work smartly. In all, they have hit four centuries and seven half-centuries to Australia’s three and three, and every batsman has had a good time: Jason Roy (303 runs), Jonny Bairstow (288), Alex Hales (212), Jos Buttler (165), Morgan (151) and Joe Root (103).

For Australia, there has been little to remark on outside of Marsh, Finch and Travis Head, who has hit two half-centuries.

Add to that the performance of the English spin twins – Moeen Ali and Adil Rashid – and it’s easy to see where the problems for Australia began and ended. Ali has eight wickets at an economy rate of 5.03, while Rashid has 11 at 5.94.

To put it simply, Australia must change these numbers around almost completely to get themselves a consolation win. More of their batsmen must score big and score quick, and the bowlers must find a way to check the scoring – the runs and the rate – when England bat. Easier said than done, though, because we are talking not only about the No.1 ODI side in the world but the side that has redefined ODI batsmanship in recent times.

Jonny Bairstow has been in the form of his life in ODIs Jonny Bairstow has been in the form of his life in ODIs

Key players

Jonny Bairstow (England): Since being made a regular at the top of the England batting order, Bairstow has been having the time of his life. In the last 12 months, he has scored all his six ODI tons, four of them coming this year in a sequence that reads 138, 104, 105, 28, 42, 139 and 79. He seems unstoppable at the moment.

Aaron Finch (Australia): His best spot is at the top of the batting order, even if he does lend the innings some stability at No.5. Back as opener in the last game, Finch scored a 106-ball 100. He will have to do it again in the final game and, like he said himself, carry on and take his innings deep. If he can do that, Australia will have a chance.

The Australians have fallen short on every count in the four games so far The Australians have fallen short on every count in the four games so far

Conditions

It should be a cool day in Manchester with some clouds threatening to affect the game once in a way. There have been only eight ODIs at Old Trafford since 2010, the last one in September 2017, when the Windies struggled to 204/9 and then saw England get past the target in just 30.5 overs for the loss of three wickets. If not much has changed, the batsmen should have a blast again.

Squads

England: Eoin Morgan (c), Moeen Ali, Jonny Bairstow, Jake Ball, Sam Billings, Jos Buttler (wk), Tom Curran, Alex Hales, Liam Plunkett, Adil Rashid, Joe Root, Jason Roy, David Willey, Mark Wood, Sam Curran, Craig Overton

Australia: Tim Paine (c, wk), Aaron Finch, Ashton Agar, Alex Carey, Travis Head, Nathan Lyon, Glenn Maxwell, Shaun Marsh, Michael Neser, Jhye Richardson, Kane Richardson, D’Arcy Short, Billy Stanlake, Marcus Stoinis, Andrew Tye

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/748831
 
England ODI matches have become very exciting in last 1-1.5 years.
 
I wanna see sam curran playing today.
Billings is on brink of getting dropped from the squad, so it will be interesting to see whether he gets last opportunity or just warms bench.
 
I heard that they'll be showing the England football game on the big screen there!
 
Tim Paine ran himself out trying to get off strike to the mighty Moeen :moali
 
What people expected, AUS are missing 5 of their top players. This is AUS A, come Workd Cup all of those 5 back, AUS will be one of the favorites. This WC is long tournament, leagues matches 9 of them, give enough chance for teams to get into form, if you have enough talent you can cause problem.

Obviously AUS is not going to play WC with this team
 
What people expected, AUS are missing 5 of their top players. This is AUS A, come Workd Cup all of those 5 back, AUS will be one of the favorites. This WC is long tournament, leagues matches 9 of them, give enough chance for teams to get into form, if you have enough talent you can cause problem.

Obviously AUS is not going to play WC with this team

So they'll be playing the world cup with a similar team to the one England beat 4-1 earlier this year?
 
Oh dear, it clashes with the football.

At this rate, it'll be all over before the end of the second half.

This hasn't been an ODI series to savour. Australia have been a shambles, injuries or not.
 
The funny thing is that the Australian side will still dominate in the next world cup with these players back:

Steve Smith
Dave Warner
Mitch Marsh
Mitch Starc
Josh Hazlewood
Pat Cummins
J Pattinson
Adam Zampa

It's as if Aus B is playing this tour with so many names missing out
 
At this rate, it'll be all over before the end of the second half.

This hasn't been an ODI series to savour. Australia have been a shambles, injuries or not.

Looks like England are under a bit of pressure.

Unlike in the football......
 
Oh my, England always seem to have one batting meltdown per series.

27-4.
 
England always take their foot off the gas.

Never mind. Hat-trick Harry in Novgorod!
 
The funny thing is that the Australian side will still dominate in the next world cup with these players back:

Steve Smith
Dave Warner
Mitch Marsh
Mitch Starc
Josh Hazlewood
Pat Cummins
<B>J Pattinson</B>
<B>Adam Zampa</B>

It's as if Aus B is playing this tour with so many names missing out

Not too sure of these two.
 
Buttler and Moeen for the win!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Best match of the series. Love a low scoring thriller in an ODI.
 
What an inning by Jos! Terrific player.

One of the best limited over batsmen going around IMO.
 
Australia have fought hard here , they have bowled well , but probably the depth in batting will see Poms through
 
Good to see Buttler doing well. Indians have a special fondness for him :)
 
Paine should have fielders under the helmet in that over.
 
Buttler is clutch! England spoiled with riches in the batting line up. He is the X factor!
 
What a team. Add Ben Stokes to this line up and that makes them one of the best top 7 in ODIs ever!
 
One of the? It's the best batting lineup in ODI history. Better than Aus batting lineup of the 2000s.

That Aussie line up won 3 WCs ... England's current line up is comparable in terms of sheer number of match winners but in order to stake a real claim to best ever they will have to win a WC or two.

At the moment definitely the deepest line up and the best one going around.
 
That Aussie line up won 3 WCs ... England's current line up is comparable in terms of sheer number of match winners but in order to stake a real claim to best ever they will have to win a WC or two.

At the moment definitely the deepest line up and the best one going around.

Matches are won by batsmen, tournaments are won by bowlers. Give England Mcgrath/Lee/Warne, and they will win all WC matches unbeaten.
 
Another example of how low scoring games are much more entertaining to watch, this match actually got close, unlike endless 350 matches.
 
The Australian batting looked good because of their bowling. This England team can win matches whatever their bowling is.

So the likes of Hayden and Gilchrist and Ponting and Symonds were good only because of McWarne and Lee?

Do you seriously believe that Bairstow and Roy are better than Hayden and Gilchrist? Root is better than Ponting?

There is a reason why that Aussie team is regarded as the greatest team of all time. Let this English team win anything significant before hyping them.
 
Winning a tournament is neither necessary nor sufficient for anointing a side as having the best batting lineup of all time. Focus of discussion is only on one discipline and thus results - which are mostly dependent on all 3 disciplines - are poor metrics for judging

Let us look at both lineups in isolation:

Aus 2002-2007 had platinum plated top 3 (Hayden/Gilly/Punter) and super clutch finishers in middle order (Symmo, Bevan/ Hussey). Effectively they always had 5 proper match winners at their peaks simultaneously capable of scoring centuries at 90-100 S/R to go with useful foils like Clarke/Watto who were beginning to establish themselves and Martyn who was intermittently good

Even India briefly in 2010-11 on paper had a best XI wherein there were 5 solid match winners with insane striking ability - SRT, Viru, GG, Yuvi, MSD (With Kohli and Raina for support). But most of their peaks didn't overlap and they rarely produced any jaw dropping batting performance.

This Eng side has a top 7 where everyone can score hundreds at 110+ S/R atleast. That is simply unprecedented. This is backed up by no.8 and no.9 of Moeen Ali and Chris Woakes who could easily be contesting for no.6 slots in almost any other ODI XI in the world. All of these lads are in same age group and peaking together and will likely have another 2-3 yrs without having to replace anyone due to age/injury.

This English batting template is unique and never before seen. Their sheer depth allows them to swing harder and for longer than any other lineup in history.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Australia last 18 completed ODIs:<br>Lost 16<br>Won 2<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1010950725801783296?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 24, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Can you hear me Don Bradman, Nicole Kidman, Baz Luhrman, Kylie Minogue, INXS, Crocodile Dundee, Skippy the Bush Kangaroo, your boys took one hell of a beating!!!!
 
So the likes of Hayden and Gilchrist and Ponting and Symonds were good only because of McWarne and Lee?

Do you seriously believe that Bairstow and Roy are better than Hayden and Gilchrist? Root is better than Ponting?

There is a reason why that Aussie team is regarded as the greatest team of all time. Let this English team win anything significant before hyping them.

The only one better than Buttler is Ponting and Gilchrist. Root is arguably better than Gilchrist. Bairstow is better than Hayden. Hales and Morgan are better than whoever else was in the Aussie lineup. Stokes is on pae with Symonds.

So yeah, only Ponting is better than anybody in English side, cause Ponting is an ATG. But the rest are better. You are forgettung Buttler's stats, they blow all Aussie batsmen out of water. Stats equalised or not.
 
The only one better than Buttler is Ponting and Gilchrist. Root is arguably better than Gilchrist. Bairstow is better than Hayden. Hales and Morgan are better than whoever else was in the Aussie lineup. Stokes is on pae with Symonds.

So yeah, only Ponting is better than anybody in English side, cause Ponting is an ATG. But the rest are better. You are forgettung Buttler's stats, they blow all Aussie batsmen out of water. Stats equalised or not.

Good lord. I wish i could unread what i just read.
 
One of the? It's the best batting lineup in ODI history. Better than Aus batting lineup of the 2000s.
On Pattas might be.We never know how will they fare on the pitches that 2000s teams played and also against reverse swing and spinners with old ball.They struggled against Chahal in India when he spun the ball in T20s and also against Pakistan in the CT17.Also we dont know how brutal the 2000s Aussie team would be had they played on today's conditions with two new balls and super pattas everywhere
 
This isn't a type of performance we haven't seem from this England LO side. What a side they are.

It's their world cup to lose next year.
 
Good lord. I wish i could unread what i just read.
Pray telll why you think Symonds is better than Stokes. Symonds might be a better batsman but Stokes is a better bowler. Not even a competition in test. Root has the potential to surpass Gilchrist as a batsman in ODIs.
 
The only one better than Buttler is Ponting and Gilchrist. Root is arguably better than Gilchrist. Bairstow is better than Hayden. Hales and Morgan are better than whoever else was in the Aussie lineup. Stokes is on pae with Symonds.

So yeah, only Ponting is better than anybody in English side, cause Ponting is an ATG. But the rest are better. You are forgettung Buttler's stats, they blow all Aussie batsmen out of water. Stats equalised or not.

sorry what? Look I think you lot need to calm down a bit. A year is a long time in cricket. Buttler may be on a roll at the moment but come the world cup and every team will be gunning to beat England..and the pressure at home will be immense.

as for who's better than buttler from the great aussies sides, lol, just about everyone in their top 5-7. If that side had the advantages Buttler has today they would have been just as unstoppable.
 
Back
Top