- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 217,977
To begin soon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are really lack of explosive openers. Every test nation apart from Zimbabwe and some associate has much better openers than us.
Need to get 250. Fawad & Siddiq key.
[MENTION=138980]TalentSpotterPk[/MENTION] I watched a little of Fakhar in a T20 game, was not impressed. Heavily favours the legside and nearly every shot was forced.
It's pretty ominous if the only ray of hope batsmen is a certain "Fawad" who was miserable the last time he played an ODI for Pakistan.
Fawad has very decent ODI record and he still deserves to be in the team
One dimensional batsmen who will always struggle if the opposition team is not Sri Lanka, Afghanistan or some other subcontinental team.
It took Australia one ODI to find out his favorite areas and block them.
How much hope does he have against NZ, SA and other better fielding sides?
Lol 5 overs 35-0 England Lions.
Surely, our "A" team isn't that bad is it?
ehsan tundler adil taken to the cleaners , ecconomy of 9)
England Lions are just so much better and on another level. The ECB have an intricate system where they groom their talent at the grass root level for the international stage and their plans are structured through the Lions team, at the academy each facet of the game is given a great deal of focus, each individual performer in the Lions team has a specific diet/training plan and individual based training when it comes to technique or fitness. However it's not just the Lions team who have the luxury of these services but also the womens team, the U-19 teams and the MCCU team; members of the Lions squad would have come through one of these channels having been groomed/developed from an early stage.
With Pakistan A, raw talent itself is not always going to be enough.
Yeah right!!!! Send them to India, Sl or even BD they will struggle to score even 180. They can not play spin at all.
Pathetic batting effort from our batsmen, just goes to show we dont have the talent interms of back up when it comes to LOI cricketLions will hammer us from here onwards.
Pathetic batting effort from our batsmen, just goes to show we dont have the talent interms of back up when it comes to LOI cricketLions will hammer us from here onwards.
No matter how many matches they lose, still pak selectors are stubborn to get the right players selected...
Umar Siddiq Khan and Fawad Alam had first class averages of 50.
What else could you want?
What should they do?
Pick the team you want?
I hope you do understand the flaw with your statement. For a player averaging 50, if he scores 100 in an inning, he has to get a 0 in another to balance out the sheet. In contrast, a player who scores 50 in an inning has to score 50 in another to keep averaging 50. I'll take Haris Sohail who has consistent 40+ scores and averages 40+ over the likes of Hafeez and Shahzad, who inflate their averages by scoring centuries against minnows, and failing when needed. To an average cricket fan, centuries and five wicket hauls may seem attractive, but those who have even basic understanding of how numbers work, these achievements are detrimental to progress in a team sport.Hope Siddiq gets a good game... pak need to develop players who can score centuries... Siddiq though avg 52 in LIST-A scored only 2 hundreds...same goes with haris sohail of LIST-A avg at around good 45 without any centuries.... and same he is doing in ODIs, cant score centuries... same goes with shafiq and shehzad,,, im only looking forward to Babar azam as this guy have scored 7 centuries in LIST-A played only 56 matches..and also sami aslam with 5 centuries///
One dimensional: yes. Will struggle against other teams? Not sure. Please prove your statement based on objective facts, as from what I remember, he averages decently in England and Australia. The last time he failed was actually in subcontinental conditions, so I can't gather the premise of your argument.One dimensional batsmen who will always struggle if the opposition team is not Sri Lanka, Afghanistan or some other subcontinental team.
It took Australia one ODI to find out his favorite areas and block them.
How much hope does he have against NZ, SA and other better fielding sides?
Abid Ali LA stats: average 31, SR 72. MashaAllah
I hope you do understand the flaw with your statement. For a player averaging 50, if he scores 100 in an inning, he has to get a 0 in another to balance out the sheet. In contrast, a player who scores 50 in an inning has to score 50 in another to keep averaging 50. I'll take Haris Sohail who has consistent 40+ scores and averages 40+ over the likes of Hafeez and Shahzad, who inflate their averages by scoring centuries against minnows, and failing when needed. To an average cricket fan, centuries and five wicket hauls may seem attractive, but those who have even basic understanding of how numbers work, these achievements are detrimental to progress in a team sport.
Sent from my INFINIX-X551 using Tapatalk
50s and 40s are not winning matches these days,,,, these guys need to bat 100 balls or score 105 runs atleast to win a match... cricket has evolved from what it was before... there is also a thread on teams how many centuries hit in a year...pak at the bottom and thats why ranked 9th... no emphasize on scoring centuries...as u say u will take haris sohail for his consistent 40s, if he is pak best batsman then he needs to develop the art scoring centuries in LOIs......
I am not undermining the importance of centuries. I was basically stating the flaw in your assumption that scoring centuries on its own can win you matches, by stating basic mathematics. Centuries are paramount to posting a big totals. However, if you closely observe (on Statsguru) the top countries in the list of 100s scored, you will notice that the players responsible for them also consistently average 30+ in matches where they do not score a century.
This implies that big scores AND consistency are required to make it big. 100s on their own cannot guarantee you a better place in the rankings tables. You need to score consistently too, something Haris has been an epitome of in recent times. Yes Haris needs to score 100s too, and No I do not believe that it is appropriate to select Khalid Latif over him.