Rayyman
Test Debutant
- Joined
- May 5, 2014
- Runs
- 15,182
You won but wasn't a crush by any means. Nonetheless, three points is still that be it a 1-0 or 10-0 victory. Next you have Spurs an we do Sunderland at home.
You will crush Sunderland.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You won but wasn't a crush by any means. Nonetheless, three points is still that be it a 1-0 or 10-0 victory. Next you have Spurs an we do Sunderland at home.
You will crush Sunderland.![]()
Well nobody has drawn us at home yet so I hope it is a good team like Spurs who do it. I'd be fine with a draw vs Tottenham.We should easily defeat them. I am saying 4-0 to the mighty Red's. Spurs could very well at least take a point of you
![]()
Well nobody has drawn us at home yet so I hope it is a good team like Spurs who do it. I'd be fine with a draw vs Tottenham.
Assuming Liverpool win we'll again regain top spot if you draw or lose.
What type of tactics has Conte been using? Pressing, tiki-taka or counter-attack?Great fightback from Chelsea. Loving this title race, couldn't get any tighter.
What type of tactics has Conte been using? Pressing, tiki-taka or counter-attack?
[MENTION=142169]PakLFC[/MENTION] Think I may have spoken too soon...Chelsea and Liverpool are currently the two best teams in the league, in my opinion. I think they're both a bit better than Arsenal and City.
Chelsea and Liverpool are currently the two best teams in the league, in my opinion. I think they're both a bit better than Arsenal and City.
Our goalkeeper and our defence is better than Liverpool. We're overall a better team than Liverpool. How can you take a team that has Milner as a lb and Lucas and lovern as cbs seriously?)
There foreward players are the reason they are so high in the table.
I'm still trying to accept the fact that Cech plays for Arsenal.
Our goalkeeper and our defence is better than Liverpool. We're overall a better team than Liverpool. How can you take a team that has Milner as a lb and Lucas and lovern as cbs seriously?)
There foreward players are the reason they are so high in the table.
And Klopp is a better manager than Wenger.
He's better now, but overall wenger is the better manager. Klopp tactically is ovverated.
Klopp will easily surpass Wenger by the time he is done with his career.
Klopp will easily surpass Wenger by the time he is done with his career.
To do that he will need to win the premier league title maybe more than once. He isn't going to win the league with Karius as gk, Milner as a lb, Lucas at cb.
In all the time that Wenger has been at Arsenal, has he ever taken them to a UCL final? He specialises in qualifying for the Champions League with his efficiency when it comes to top-four finishes in the EPL, but I don't recall him achieving anything memorable in the UCL, which is considered to be the pinnacle of modern day football.
As far as I'm concerned, Klopp taking an underdog club like Dortmund to the UCL final is a greater managerial achievement than any of Arsene's.
Also, Klopp won back-to-back Bundesliga titles with Dortmund. Doesn't make sense to compare Wenger's time at Arsenal with Klopp's time at Liverpool. Atleast he hasn't had massive droughts where he goes many years without winning a major title like Wenger has.
Yes Wengers champions league record isn't the best, but other one champions league final what has klopp ever done in the champions league?
Also once klopp pressing style was figured out in Germany he left dortmund.
Dortmund weren't that much of underdogs, a team with Lewendowski, Reus,Gotze,Gundogan, Hummels,Subotic isn't underdogs. It's a very good team. Yes it was an outstanding achievement to get to the champions league final but not as good as your making out. Wenger got to the champions league final with Flamini as lb,Sendoros as a cb, an 18 year old cm in cesc fabregas. So that isn't an achievement?
Yes klopp did good to win the league but his dortmund team was the best after Bayern. Once Bayern bought pep in klopp couldn't even get close to him. Bundasliga is competitive so if your going to play that cats that it's a poor league than Klopp's achievement of winning the league should be downplayed as he still had a good team.
Overall wenger has a had a better career than Klopp, but Klopp is currently the better manager. For klopp to be better than wenger he has to win the premier league at least once. Wenger isn't the greatest manger in the world, I wouldn't put him up there with greats of all time but he is certainly just below them. Klopp has a bit of work to do before surpassing wenger.
Also klopp hasn't won a major trophy since 2012 so let's not talk as if he hasn't gone a long time without winning a trophy.
I would say Wenger has had a longer, rather than better career compared to Klopp. In fact, it's so long that I had no idea he ever reached the UCL final.
It's not fair to compare the number of titles they've accumulated due to Wenger having been a manager for far longer. That's like comparing a team's ODI score with another team's T20I score without accounting for the difference between the number of overs.
I reckon if Klopp could continue managing at the same level for another decade or two, he would end up with a far better record than Wenger.
Wenger also deserves strong criticism for his notorious reluctance to buy somewhat expensive top players, despite Arsenal not lacking funds. Not a good trait for the manager of a big club to have.
Well he has reached it , it's not hard to forget considering how we lost the final and the team we lost too.
So you can't compare there league titles, but you can compare there whole careers where klopp has been managing for about half the time wenger has? Who's to say klopp doesn't win anything again, will he still be a better manager than wenger?
Yes klopps this footballing genius who puts Milner at lb,Lucas as a CB, who can't sign a decent goalkeeper, who refuses to play a defensive midfielder. If he carries on with decisions like this he can definitely be a better manager than wenger .)
Yes wenger does deserve criticism for not signing big players, but what big players has klopp signed at Liverpool or Dortmund for that matter? Yet you praise him like there is no tomorrow. Liverpool needed a lb, he didn't sign one. If it was wenger he would get criticism but media darling klopp can get away with it. Not playing a recognised dm in a league as physical as the premier league only media darling jurgen can get away with such a crime. The things wenger gets criticism for klopp is equally as guilty. If you know anything about klopp you should know he doesn't like to spend big in the transfer market like wenger. But of course you won't give him stick for that.
Sometimes instead of relaying on the perception the media has on mangers, you should look more closely at things. Klopp is similar to wenger than people think, but because he is more friendly with the media and because he is liked he is allowed to get with poor decision making. Not signing a lb, a striker, and a dm was a naive, foolish , and poor footballing decision. Wenger has bought the players we need this summer so can't be critizced for this summers window.
You raise some good points, however, at the end of the day results are what count and Wenger has had a fairly poor decade in terms of that. For all his flaws, Klopp has achieved a lot more than Arsene in this particular period of time.
Time will tell whether he will be able to match his past achievements for sustained periods in the future, or fall away like Jose seems to have. I'd say he's had a pretty good start at Liverpool considering the state of the team when he arrived, but they still have some glaring deficiencies (defence) which may prove costly in the title race.
Too early to declare one manager superior to the other, mainly because Klopp is just 49 years old, which is pretty young for a manager, but I reckon he has a higher ceiling than Wenger who's unlikely to have too much left in his (managerial) tank at such an advanced age.
Wenger has had a poor decade but it's not easy to match the previous decade before. Hopefully it's his last season and he can end on high. Don't think I could another poor season under wenger. This one has started well.
Wenger is a healthy guy, it won't be due to age if he retires at the end of the season
Costa and Lewandpwski are the best strikers in the world.Fantastic stuff from Costa earlier. West Brom looked determined to hold on for a draw, therefore, the three points are invaluable with Arsenal breathing down our necks.
Costa and Lewandpwski are the best strikers in the world.
Griezmann isn't a striker and Aubamwyabg is borderline striker.True. The likes of Griezmann and Aubameyang are right up there as well.
Griezmann isn't a striker and Aubamwyabg is borderline striker.
Will Pep get criticised by the media? Of course not because he is media's darling. I thought he was going to win everything at City. Media are very quick to criticise Jose and United but you never hear any criticism of City of the bald fraud.
You are too quick to write plyers/mangers off. Pep has been slightly exposed but he needs to get rid a lot of these players so he can get players who fit his style. Jose gets more criticism because he is use to the premier league and because he blames everyone else apart from himself when Manchester United lose. Pep is in his 1st season of English football. If he is still performing this poorly by all means you can write him off but give him another summer window and pre season before writing him off.
I'm not writing him off. He is a good manager but not the perfect messiah that media likes to make him out to be.