What's new

[EXCLUSIVE] "It's hypocritical, if India feels so strongly then why play Pakistan at all": Ehsan Mani

The Bald Eagle

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 25, 2023
Runs
22,718
In this exclusive interview, Ehsan Mani, former PCB Chairman and ICC President, shares his candid views on politics in cricket, India’s dominance in the ICC, and Pakistan’s long-term cricketing challenges. Drawing on decades of administrative experience, Mani discusses the pitfalls of political interference, the imbalance of power in global cricket, and his vision for rebuilding Pakistan’s domestic system — and much more.

Key revelations include:

Politics in cricket: “When politics comes into the game, the only loser is cricket.” – On India–Pakistan tensions hurting the sport. Mani stresses that political interference, particularly between India and Pakistan, damages the sport's health and limits opportunities for fans and players.

India’s ICC influence: “PCB doesn’t get a penny more when Pakistan plays India — ICC and India do.” – On financial inequities. This revelation highlights a perceived financial disparity within the ICC. Mani suggests that while matches featuring the immensely popular India vs. Pakistan rivalry generate vast revenues for the ICC and BCCI, PCB does not see a proportionate increase in its share for participating.

Leadership standards: “I’m very against politicians being involved in the game.” – On Mohsin Naqvi’s dual roles. Mani strongly criticizes the practice of installing political figures as cricket administrators. This comment directly addresses the appointment of current PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi, who also serves as the Chief Minister of Punjab. Mani believes that such dual roles create potential conflicts of interest, undermine the autonomy of the cricket board, and distract the leadership from focusing solely on the long-term needs of the sport.

ICC reform: “The ICC’s governance structure is crying out for a total revamp.” – On conflicts of interest in world cricket. This is a call for a complete overhaul of the ICC's governing body. Mani suggests that the current structure is flawed, allowing for conflicts of interest where the biggest member boards wield disproportionate power, often prioritizing their own commercial interests over the global development of the game.

Domestic structure warning: “Unless we fix our domestic cricket, Pakistan will remain mid-table and mediocre.” – On rebuilding Pakistan’s cricket base. Ehsan Mani argues that the fundamental weakness in Pakistan cricket lies in its domestic infrastructure. A flawed or inconsistent domestic structure fails to adequately develop and prepare players for the rigors of international cricket. Unless fixed, the national team will struggle to consistently compete at the top level.

Future vision: “You need strategic planning — not reactive leadership.” – On how PCB can regain direction. The former PCB Chairman advocates for a shift from short-sighted, immediate decision-making to a long-term, clearly defined strategic plan. He believes that the PCB often operates in response to crises or temporary trends (reactive), instead of following a comprehensive, sustained vision (strategic planning) for player development, coaching philosophy, and financial stability over the next five to ten years.

Watch the latest interview with Saj below:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because of hypocrisy... India is trying to portray itself that they are strong and tries to fool its public by not playing in bilateral series, but they end up playing Pakistan in ACC and ICC events.

Looks like India’s moral compass seems to work only until the toss—suddenly all that ‘principled stand’ melts away when there are TV rights, sponsorships, and ICC points on the line.
 
Mr. Mani is what I call from my experience a proper CEO of an organization.

Speaks with calm authority and his views on BCCI's Asia Cup shenanigans are spot on.

What exactly did he do as Chairman of the PCB? Wasim Khan as the CEO was running the day to day affairs of the PCB. Ehsan Mani had no personality or authority of his own, he was taking orders from Imran Khan and Imran Khan in the end removed him and replaced him with Ramiz Raja.
 
What exactly did he do as Chairman of the PCB? Wasim Khan as the CEO was running the day to day affairs of the PCB. Ehsan Mani had no personality or authority of his own, he was taking orders from Imran Khan and Imran Khan in the end removed him and replaced him with Ramiz Raja.

He has more personality than many others.

He was working with Wasim and Imran Khan did not have time to run Pakistan cricket so keep this out of this discussion.

You can talk about the points made in the interview and that's it for this thread.
 
Mani probably can't even recognize what international cricket has become now. He came up during a time when Asian unity was very much a thing because of people like Arif Ali Khan Abbasi, I.S Bindra and most importantly, Jagmohan Dalmiya.

Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka worked together to counter the English-Australian dominance of world cricket. The 1996 World Cup was very much a testament of that and showed how much Asian cooperation could benefit international cricket, because that World Cup was organized entirely by these three countries. 1996 WC was gamechanger in showing the English and Australians that South Asia was a real force in cricket, who they could not sideline any longer.

It's a shame we will likely never see that again because of obvious reasons.
 
He has more personality than many others.

He was working with Wasim and Imran Khan did not have time to run Pakistan cricket so keep this out of this discussion.

You can talk about the points made in the interview and that's it for this thread.

Talk is useless and cheap. What did he do exactly when he was PCB Chairman? Naqvi for all his faults has atleast stood up to the BCCI.
 
Talk is useless and cheap. What did he do exactly when he was PCB Chairman? Naqvi for all his faults has atleast stood up to the BCCI.

Can you please tell us where we stand as a cricket team today?

Naqvi Sahib's political acts are for politics - nothing to improve cricket situation.

Also this thread is not about Naqvi.

Below article is from PCB, you can read about his achievements and make a view on that.

 
Last edited:
Ironic how it's always us to step up to improve relationships. We went to India for World Cup thinking they'd do same in ct25 and other tournaments in Pakistan. Mr Mani rightly says how politics are destroying a beautiful sport like cricket.
 
I would have used an even stronger word then hypocritical, but what can one expect for some for whom money reigns supreme over everything
 
Back
Top