What's new

Fab 4 - Cricket's poster boys

Extra_Cover

Local Club Star
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Runs
2,049
Post of the Week
8
Over the past decade it has been well established who have been the poster boys of cricket also known as Fab 4 [Kohli, Smith, Root and Williamson]. The career trajectory of these 4 players have been eerily similar as well and they have pretty much ruled the roost and been representing cricket for a good part of last decade.

Where we stand now is actually a pivotal point in time where we are seeing the curve of these players take a turn towards the downside and its fair to say its soon going to be that time when we establish our new cricket poster boys. Before we do that lets see where each of the current poster boys are at and when did their downward turn started.

Kohli - Already established as an ATG in limited overs had a pretty torrid time with the bat for the past couple of years now. For a guy who used to hit centuries for fun haven't had one for 2 years is unreal and unheard of. When it comes to batting form his decline already started and over the past 6 months his relationship with the Board has also gone sour. He has lost/surrendered his captaincy across all formats even in IPL. Signs are there that he would retire from international cricket very soon now given a player of his calibre would not be suited to play under someone else's shadow. I personally feel with 2023 WC he would hang his boots.

Smith - Needless to go any further than to say his sandpaper antics was pretty much the start of his decline. He has remained a very good batsman but he is not the same as he used to be before the tampering saga. His captaincy has already been taken away and for his remaining career he would not be given the spotlight that a cricket poster boy deserves so he has fallen off this list.

Root - He is the one who had the most scrutiny over the Fab 4 status early on and here we are with him carrying the mantle firmly at the moment. He has been in the form of his life over the past year however mentally I do not feel he is as strong as the other 3. Therefore, the current Ashes drubbing would certainly carry an impact on Root and in most likelihood he would lose his test captaincy and as a result England would try to put the spotlight on someone else and he would lose the spotlight that a poster boy carries in a year's time.

Williamson - He did come through and produced the best T20 innings of 2021 in the final for me which is his weakest format but off late not much spotlight has been shone on him. Yes he won the WTC and took his team to final in limited overs circuit so all in all he is doing well and most likely would hold onto the spotlight for longer than the above 3. We might have to wait on Williamson to fall out of the spotlight but given NZ play so little cricket it is bound to happen in a year or two.

As mentioned above all the current Fab 4 are pretty much in a decline or going into a decline which shows that the mantle of cricket's poster boys should now shift onto someone else. Usually we have seen Fab 4 defined as a strong batsman for their side with leadership ability. If we apply the similar metrics then I can see the following cricketers taking up this mantle for next 5 years or more.

Babar Azam - The first one on this list is an easy pick. Babar constantly features in the top 3 batsmen already across format and has been part of that list for a good part of past 2 years or so. He is the captain of Pakistan team and already started to be idolised in the country. He is an automatic choice to carry this mantle forward.

KL Rahul - He is touted to be the next best thing after retirements of Kohli and Sharma. Over his career he has already shown more than enough glimpses of carrying the batting elegance and talent that a Fab 4 would be proud of. He is also most likely to be thrusted with a leadership role in future and hence he would make this list as well.

Marnus Labuchagne - He has already shown that he belongs in the top bracket in test cricket which is evident with his consistency and runs he make. He might not have the best technique going around but he certainly has the best application. Although he is yet to do anything substantial in limited overs I believe his time would come soon in limited overs too where he would be a reliant batsman for Australia. He very well could also be a candidate to take over from Cummins after his stint.

On the current outlook in cricket above are the only names that can muster a Fab 3 going forward. On names alone they don't give the same level of excitement that Fab 4 gave but nonetheless they are going to be the poster boys going forward.

I gave consideration to Latham from NZ, Mendis from SL and Pope from England but none of them have either been consistent enough or have done anything substantial consistently that the above 3 have done. Overall, I wish the next decade although it would be dominated by the batters above I personally would want that we go into the next decade and it is defined by Fab 4 or Fab 3 of bowlers rather than batters like it used to be in the past.
 
Babar is LOI player and strictly average test player.
KL also mediocre but better than Babar in tests.
Labu is one format player.

These so called next Fab-3 batters are nowhere near to current Fab-4.
 
Last edited:
How about Devon Conway from New Zealand?
 
It’s looking like a terrible decade for batsmen, Babar alone for now in LOI.. and hopefully with cricket returning to Pak we can see some good test runs as well.
 
Babar is LOI player and strictly average test player.
KL also mediocre but better than Babar in tests.
Labu is one format player.

These so called next Fab-3 batters are nowhere near to current Fab-4.

Kohli with his 28 average in last 2+ years is nowhere near other top-tier test players.
 
Kohli with his 28 average in last 2+ years is nowhere near other top-tier test players.

You need to look at overall stats rather than filter stats.

Even Tailenders Nagvara and Shahen Afridi scored more runs than Babar in Zimbabwe tour, that doesn't mean they are better than Babar by applying filter stats.


Capture.jpg
 
It’s looking like a terrible decade for batsmen, Babar alone for now in LOI.. and hopefully with cricket returning to Pak we can see some good test runs as well.

He is not test material.

Babar is what, 27 years..
By that age :
Kohli was N0-1 batsmen all formats. He has 5 Test Centuries in Australia alone, 103 and 97 in South Africa and couple of double hundreds.

Steve Smith achieved N0-1 rank in Test cricket ,he had a double century at Lords, He has 8 away Test Centuries in multiple countries outside Australia.

Williamson had centuries in India at debut, vs South Africa in SA, vs Australia in Australia in tests as well.

Joe Root also had excellent Test record against every cricket nation.

Meanwhile at the same age Baabar can't even score big against Zimbabwe.
 
Babar is head and shoulders above any other cricketer as an all format batsman among U-30 batsman.

Second best as all format bat is KL Rahul but he will be 30 in some days.

Pant is yet to flourish in LOIs, Rizwan yet to do it in ODIs and he is 29 also, Markram yet to do anything in ODIs and Marnus doesn't look to be a LOI player but he can make a case for himself if he can maintain consistency in ODIs.

Anyone else left?
 
Babar and Labu are the two stand out performers in tests.
In t20s and odis it has to be Babar followed by KL Rahul.
 
He is not test material.

Babar is what, 27 years..
By that age :
Kohli was N0-1 batsmen all formats. He has 5 Test Centuries in Australia alone, 103 and 97 in South Africa and couple of double hundreds.

Steve Smith achieved N0-1 rank in Test cricket ,he had a double century at Lords, He has 8 away Test Centuries in multiple countries outside Australia.

Williamson had centuries in India at debut, vs South Africa in SA, vs Australia in Australia in tests as well.

Joe Root also had excellent Test record against every cricket nation.

Meanwhile at the same age Baabar can't even score big against Zimbabwe.

No one considers Babar Azam a test great. Fawad Alam has been the most reliable test batsmen for the past 1 year. Azam is a LOI monster where he has no competitor for now.

Meanwhile, Kohli became a huge disappointment in tests at his peak. Someone having a pitiful average of 29 in 29 test innings would have been dropped in any team but India is a masala media-ruled place and Kohli has too much market brand value.
 
He is not test material.

Babar is what, 27 years..
By that age :
Kohli was N0-1 batsmen all formats. He has 5 Test Centuries in Australia alone, 103 and 97 in South Africa and couple of double hundreds.

Steve Smith achieved N0-1 rank in Test cricket ,he had a double century at Lords, He has 8 away Test Centuries in multiple countries outside Australia.

Williamson had centuries in India at debut, vs South Africa in SA, vs Australia in Australia in tests as well.

Joe Root also had excellent Test record against every cricket nation.

Meanwhile at the same age Baabar can't even score big against Zimbabwe.

When did Williamson score a ton in SA?
 
Kohli struggling for runs even at home
Root looking suspect on slower pitches
NZ create history without Williamson facing a single delivery
Smith looking iffy with a big point to prove in the upcoming BGT

Is the fab four era coming to an end?
 
Over the past decade it has been well established who have been the poster boys of cricket also known as Fab 4 [Kohli, Smith, Root and Williamson]. The career trajectory of these 4 players have been eerily similar as well and they have pretty much ruled the roost and been representing cricket for a good part of last decade.

Where we stand now is actually a pivotal point in time where we are seeing the curve of these players take a turn towards the downside and its fair to say its soon going to be that time when we establish our new cricket poster boys. Before we do that lets see where each of the current poster boys are at and when did their downward turn started.

Kohli - Already established as an ATG in limited overs had a pretty torrid time with the bat for the past couple of years now. For a guy who used to hit centuries for fun haven't had one for 2 years is unreal and unheard of. When it comes to batting form his decline already started and over the past 6 months his relationship with the Board has also gone sour. He has lost/surrendered his captaincy across all formats even in IPL. Signs are there that he would retire from international cricket very soon now given a player of his calibre would not be suited to play under someone else's shadow. I personally feel with 2023 WC he would hang his boots.

Smith - Needless to go any further than to say his sandpaper antics was pretty much the start of his decline. He has remained a very good batsman but he is not the same as he used to be before the tampering saga. His captaincy has already been taken away and for his remaining career he would not be given the spotlight that a cricket poster boy deserves so he has fallen off this list.

Root - He is the one who had the most scrutiny over the Fab 4 status early on and here we are with him carrying the mantle firmly at the moment. He has been in the form of his life over the past year however mentally I do not feel he is as strong as the other 3. Therefore, the current Ashes drubbing would certainly carry an impact on Root and in most likelihood he would lose his test captaincy and as a result England would try to put the spotlight on someone else and he would lose the spotlight that a poster boy carries in a year's time.

Williamson - He did come through and produced the best T20 innings of 2021 in the final for me which is his weakest format but off late not much spotlight has been shone on him. Yes he won the WTC and took his team to final in limited overs circuit so all in all he is doing well and most likely would hold onto the spotlight for longer than the above 3. We might have to wait on Williamson to fall out of the spotlight but given NZ play so little cricket it is bound to happen in a year or two.

As mentioned above all the current Fab 4 are pretty much in a decline or going into a decline which shows that the mantle of cricket's poster boys should now shift onto someone else. Usually we have seen Fab 4 defined as a strong batsman for their side with leadership ability. If we apply the similar metrics then I can see the following cricketers taking up this mantle for next 5 years or more.

Babar Azam - The first one on this list is an easy pick. Babar constantly features in the top 3 batsmen already across format and has been part of that list for a good part of past 2 years or so. He is the captain of Pakistan team and already started to be idolised in the country. He is an automatic choice to carry this mantle forward.

KL Rahul - He is touted to be the next best thing after retirements of Kohli and Sharma. Over his career he has already shown more than enough glimpses of carrying the batting elegance and talent that a Fab 4 would be proud of. He is also most likely to be thrusted with a leadership role in future and hence he would make this list as well.

Marnus Labuchagne - He has already shown that he belongs in the top bracket in test cricket which is evident with his consistency and runs he make. He might not have the best technique going around but he certainly has the best application. Although he is yet to do anything substantial in limited overs I believe his time would come soon in limited overs too where he would be a reliant batsman for Australia. He very well could also be a candidate to take over from Cummins after his stint.

On the current outlook in cricket above are the only names that can muster a Fab 3 going forward. On names alone they don't give the same level of excitement that Fab 4 gave but nonetheless they are going to be the poster boys going forward.

I gave consideration to Latham from NZ, Mendis from SL and Pope from England but none of them have either been consistent enough or have done anything substantial consistently that the above 3 have done. Overall, I wish the next decade although it would be dominated by the batters above I personally would want that we go into the next decade and it is defined by Fab 4 or Fab 3 of bowlers rather than batters like it used to be in the past.
I’m amazed Extra cover didn’t say Babar, Rizwan, Shaheen and Naseem as the fab 4
 
I don't quiet agree. But I can see where Lehmann comes from. One guy has 7 centuries in Australia. Root is yet to get one. Kohli has 1000 runs at Adelaide oval across the format.

Seems Lehmann is just trying to be edgy. In recent years, Joe Root has been a far superior batter compared to both Smith and Kohli. He also has more runs, centuries, and time left at the top than either of them.

Every batter struggles somewhere. Kohli's struggles in England are well-documented, and Steve Smith has struggled in, erm... Bangladesh.
 
Seems Lehmann is just trying to be edgy. In recent years, Joe Root has been a far superior batter compared to both Smith and Kohli. He also has more runs, centuries, and time left at the top than either of them.

Every batter struggles somewhere. Kohli's struggles in England are well-documented, and Steve Smith has struggled in, erm... Bangladesh.
Kohli atleast had one box office series in England. Root has to fix his CV in Australia. He is so eager to correct that. That is the ultimate challenge for him. SMith has done it in England. Failure in BD means little as they don't play them often. There was an analysis done on that i recall. The backfoot game he adopts in England is not working in Australia. He was like a petrified child when he was up against fast and furious Mitchell johnson in 2014. Same year Kohli bullied Mitchell Johnson

Mitch vs Kohli in 2014 test series

157 balls 145 runs 92.4 strike rate 48.3 avge

Mitch vs Root in 2014 test series

226 balls 59 runs 26.1 strike rate 29.5 avge

 
Kohli atleast had one box office series in England. Root has to fix his CV in Australia. He is so eager to correct that. That is the ultimate challenge for him. SMith has done it in England. Failure in BD means little as they don't play them often. There was an analysis done on that i recall. The backfoot game he adopts in England is not working in Australia. He was like a petrified child when he was up against fast and furious Mitchell johnson in 2014. Same year Kohli bullied Mitchell Johnson

Mitch vs Kohli in 2014 test series

157 balls 145 runs 92.4 strike rate 48.3 avge

Mitch vs Root in 2014 test series

226 balls 59 runs 26.1 strike rate 29.5 avge

I think you missed the joke I was making with the Bangladesh line. Obviously, nobody cares that he failed in two test matches in Bangladesh. Smith is still in a supreme category despite not being at that same level he was at till 2019. But I think you're downplaying how great Root has been lately. He has evolved leaps and bounds as a batter and taken his game to new heights. Not too long ago, he was probably the fourth best in the group and regularly getting out after scoring half-centuries. Now he deals in daddy hundreds. He has scored as many centuries this year (14 test matches) as Smith has in the two years (30 test matches) and Kohli has in the last five years (43 test matches).

Root still has a couple of Ashes to redeem his record in Australia. How much time do Smith and Kohli have left on the clock?
 
I think you missed the joke I was making with the Bangladesh line. Obviously, nobody cares that he failed in two test matches in Bangladesh. Smith is still in a supreme category despite not being at that same level he was at till 2019. But I think you're downplaying how great Root has been lately. He has evolved leaps and bounds as a batter and taken his game to new heights. Not too long ago, he was probably the fourth best in the group and regularly getting out after scoring half-centuries. Now he deals in daddy hundreds. He has scored as many centuries this year (14 test matches) as Smith has in the two years (30 test matches) and Kohli has in the last five years (43 test matches).

Root still has a couple of Ashes to redeem his record in Australia. How much time do Smith and Kohli have left on the clock?

Currently i rate Root above everyone else. But his issues on challenging tracks compared to Smith still needs to be addressed. He has done well on true wickets. His technique is versatile enough for most conditions. But bouncier conditions, turning conditions are two areas he has to conquer. I am talking from the perspective of an Australian. If an Australian rates Kohli above Root i know why they do. He earned massive respect in that last tour. Because they like these confrontational, in your face guys who back up their antics with performances. Root is far from that. He looked timid , too conservative that didn't ruffle the feathers of Australian. Kohli made some remarks about Mitch johnson. I think it all started when Johns threw the ball at the stumps to run him out and hit Kohli actually. Since then things were not smooth between the two.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Currently i rate Root above everyone else. But his issues on challenging tracks compared to Smith still needs to be addressed. He has done well on true wickets. His technique is versatile enough for most conditions. But bouncier conditions, turning conditions are two areas he has to conquer. I am talking from the perspective of an Australian. If an Australian rates Kohli above Root i know why they do. He earned massive respect in that last tour. Because they like these confrontational, in your face guys who back up their antics with performances. Root is far from that. He looked timid , too conservative that didn't ruffle the feathers of Australian. Kohli made some remarks about Mitch johnson. I think it all started when Johns threw the ball at the stumps to run him out and hit Kohli actually. Since then things were not smooth between the two.

I'm not sure if I agree with that assessment. He averages 50 in South Africa which is place known for having fast and bouncy pitches. Yes he had a horror-show tour in 2013, but that was over a decade ago. He has come a long way since then. With recent performances you have to consider some context too. In the last Ashes in Australia most batters from both sides struggled. And English batters in particular were really poor across the board. Despite that, he was the third highest run-getter in the series and England's highest run-getter. Even in 2018, when England were meted out another savage beating, he averaged 47 in the series and was England's second highest run-getter. So it's clear that scoring runs in Australia is not the problem for him. It's the absence of impactful knocks and the England's batting line-up's lack of competence at providing him with any kind of meaningful support.
 
I'm not sure if I agree with that assessment. He averages 50 in South Africa which is place known for having fast and bouncy pitches. Yes he had a horror-show tour in 2013, but that was over a decade ago. He has come a long way since then. With recent performances you have to consider some context too. In the last Ashes in Australia most batters from both sides struggled. And English batters in particular were really poor across the board. Despite that, he was the third highest run-getter in the series and England's highest run-getter. Even in 2018, when England were meted out another savage beating, he averaged 47 in the series and was England's second highest run-getter. So it's clear that scoring runs in Australia is not the problem for him. It's the absence of impactful knocks and the England's batting line-up's lack of competence at providing him with any kind of meaningful support.
He needs a 500 run series in Australia to cement his legacy. Otherwise there will always be questions either about his technique in Australia or his mental strength there
 
I'm not sure if I agree with that assessment. He averages 50 in South Africa which is place known for having fast and bouncy pitches. Yes he had a horror-show tour in 2013, but that was over a decade ago. He has come a long way since then. With recent performances you have to consider some context too. In the last Ashes in Australia most batters from both sides struggled. And English batters in particular were really poor across the board. Despite that, he was the third highest run-getter in the series and England's highest run-getter. Even in 2018, when England were meted out another savage beating, he averaged 47 in the series and was England's second highest run-getter. So it's clear that scoring runs in Australia is not the problem for him. It's the absence of impactful knocks and the England's batting line-up's lack of competence at providing him with any kind of meaningful support.
SA cannot be used as an example. Not all the pitches are rolled out as bouncy pitches. Some of them just offers swing much like English conditions. In Australia most pitches have extra bounce. Average bounce in SA is even less than in England.


Read this Ian chappell's article from last month


"The more worrying Root statistic in Australia is the number of times he's been caught behind. Keepers have had a bonanza as ten times they've clasped Root's edges in just 27 innings. While he could counter with "you've got to be good enough to nick 'em", it does suggest he needs to re-assess the extra bounce Australian pitches provide."


bz84doczhft91.jpg
 
SA cannot be used as an example. Not all the pitches are rolled out as bouncy pitches. Some of them just offers swing much like English conditions. In Australia most pitches have extra bounce. Average bounce in SA is even less than in England.


Read this Ian chappell's article from last month


"The more worrying Root statistic in Australia is the number of times he's been caught behind. Keepers have had a bonanza as ten times they've clasped Root's edges in just 27 innings. While he could counter with "you've got to be good enough to nick 'em", it does suggest he needs to re-assess the extra bounce Australian pitches provide."


bz84doczhft91.jpg
Fair enough. But like I said, Root has two good tours in Australia to cement his legacy. Considering he is at his peak right now, he has a decent chance to do just that. How much time does Kohli have left to rectify his mediocre numbers in England and New Zealand? And how much time does Smith have left on the clock altogether?
 
Back
Top