shaz619
Test Star
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
- Runs
- 38,372
- Post of the Week
- 7
In COURT





What are your predictions? who comes out the victor in this DUEL for the ages.
Prepare the battlefield!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[MENTION=47617]Red Devil[/MENTION] [MENTION=100918]Square Drive[/MENTION] [MENTION=136193]Adil_94[/MENTION] @Bhaag Viru Baag [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] [MENTION=3474]TalhaSyed[/MENTION] [MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION]
in court? how come?
Bah gawd, PCB needs to get [MENTION=131867]London_Lahori[/MENTION] on board. This could be Slippin' Lahori's Wrestlemania moment!![]()
- BCCI promised that if the PCB support the Big Three initiative, they will play six series against them.
- BCCI, despite not informing the PCB beforehand, are now claiming that this won't be possible because Hindu nationalists plaguing the Indian government.
- PCB is rightfully taking them to court over this blatant fraud.
This won't accomplish anything tangible but it will humiliate the BCCI further and gain the PCB some much-needed credibility and support.
- BCCI promised that if the PCB support the Big Three initiative, they will play six series against them.
- BCCI, despite not informing the PCB beforehand, are now claiming that this won't be possible because Hindu nationalists plaguing the Indian government.
- PCB is rightfully taking them to court over this blatant fraud.
This won't accomplish anything tangible but it will humiliate the BCCI further and gain the PCB some much-needed credibility and support.
I think he knew all this but was pretending to be slow or maybe the typical parosi nuhreh before Pakistan destroy India?
His services are in need, the man has helped the bear clear his debt. Who do you predict will emerge victorious in this battle?
There was no need for spoilers. We all knew it was COURT.![]()
[MENTION=131867]London_Lahori[/MENTION] is a lawyer by professionI don't think anything will happen.. I am not a lawyer but if there is any lawyer here who could answer the below questions it would be clear how much of a case PCB has against BCCI:
1. Where are PCB planning to sue BCCI?
2. Where ever they are planning to sue does that court has jurisdiction to fine BCCI?
3. Is MOU a legally binding document?
4. The GOI has officially refused to give permission to BCCI to play against Pakistan, doesn't that frees BCCI of any charges since GOI is above any private board?
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] you seem like a lawyer mate you think PCB case got much weight in it?
[MENTION=131867]London_Lahori[/MENTION] is a lawyer by profession
- BCCI promised that if the PCB support the Big Three initiative, they will play six series against them.
- BCCI, despite not informing the PCB beforehand, are now claiming that this won't be possible because Hindu nationalists plaguing the Indian government.
- PCB is rightfully taking them to court over this blatant fraud.
This won't accomplish anything tangible but it will humiliate the BCCI further and gain the PCB some much-needed credibility and support.
I don't think anything will happen.. I am not a lawyer but if there is any lawyer here who could answer the below questions it would be clear how much of a case PCB has against BCCI:
1. Where are PCB planning to sue BCCI?
2. Where ever they are planning to sue does that court has jurisdiction to fine BCCI?
3. Is MOU a legally binding document?
4. The GOI has officially refused to give permission to BCCI to play against Pakistan, doesn't that frees BCCI of any charges since GOI is above any private board?
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] you seem like a lawyer mate you think PCB case got much weight in it?
Eager to see what comes out of this.
Very good step taken by the PCB. Humiliate BCCI as much as possible.
[MENTION=47617]Red Devil[/MENTION] [MENTION=100918]Square Drive[/MENTION] [MENTION=136193]Adil_94[/MENTION] @Bhaag Viru Baag [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] [MENTION=3474]TalhaSyed[/MENTION] [MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION]
BCCI will not sign any contract with PCB in future, in the long run PCB will be at loss.
Good use the current contract is!
is there even such a thing as a legally binding contract between PCB and BCCI ?
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] [MENTION=142162]Napa[/MENTION] [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION]
If not bi laterals I would love to see India vs PAk in CT but I was listening to Gavaskar and he is also in no mood to send a team.
I think others don't quite have an appreciation how ****** off Indians are, nobody likes to be ganged up upon. Wait till you hear the State Boards at the SGM.
I think Indians should also be critical of the Supreme Court for sticking its nose where it doesn't belong.
is there even such a thing as a legally binding contract between PCB and BCCI ?
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] [MENTION=142162]Napa[/MENTION] [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION]
[MENTION=131867]London_Lahori[/MENTION] is a lawyer by profession
The first issue of a legally binding contract would be where it was signed, and generally I believe the courts there would have jurisdiction. Unless BCCI really really wanted a series with Pakistan, it would sign a contract in a "safe" jurisdiction for itself, like India. Of course, PCB may have wanted a different jurisdiction for the same reasons.
Secondly, any decent lawyer who prepared a contract would put in clauses that would exempt his client from liabilities due to the factors out of the client's control. Here we have BCCI being told by the Govt. of India that they can't play Pakistan, a factor that is certainly out of its control.
Finally, I am not aware of any contract between PCB and BCCI, and it seems unlikely that anything like that exists. A MOU is not necessarily a contract.
Depends on the clauses of the contract. AFAIK the MoU has a clause that the series will be played subject to govt clearance.So that saves that saves the BCCI.Also almost any contract will contain clauses related to factors outside the control of the parties, like war,natural calamity etc. They cover even govt regulations. The MoU is not a commercial contract as such.
There also will be jurisdictional issues.