What's new

Fixing cricket’s broken system could change the Ashes as we know it

hoshiarpurexpress

T20I Debutant
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Runs
6,340
Australia and England must be prepared to play Ashes series of fewer than five Tests and every three years instead of every two.
This is the view of FICA (Federation of International Cricketers’ Associations) executive chairman Heath Mills, who is lobbying the game’s global powers for a streamlined and fair future tours program from April 2023.

Mills, speaking from his home in Auckland on the latest Fox Cricket podcast, explained the need for all countries to make sacrifices for the good of the global game.

The current future tours program expires in March 2023 and beyond that the World Test Championship is just one of many priorities the International Cricket Council (ICC) is attempting to juggle.

T20 and T10 leagues loom large because of the money they generate via TV rights, as do traditional and lucrative Test match ups involving Australia, India and England.

And not even The Ashes – cricket’s oldest international series – should be safe from change, according to the global players’ boss.

“The biggest barrier to having more structure to a program is those big five-match Test series’ and perhaps we can have some compromise there,” Mills said on Fox Cricket’s Follow-On podcast.

“We all know how important that is and we love The Ashes, but maybe there has to be some compromise on that and how often The Ashes is played. Maybe it might make it more attractive. They seem to have played it a lot in the last 20 years.”

The notion that Australia could face England for the coveted urn in a three-Test series every three years would make traditionalists and administrators shudder. But Mills said it would streamline a broken system.

Moreover, England is due to play a five-Test series against India at home later this year, reaffirming Mills’ concern that the three wealthiest cricket nations look after each other above all else.

“Everyone is going to have to give a bit,” he said.

The peculiarities of the current World Test Championship have seen some series’ simply not count towards the table.

England’s tour of New Zealand in late 2019 – which the tourists won 1-0 – did not contribute towards the global ladder, which the Kiwis are now at the top of.

Asked whether The Ashes could be played outside the realms of the World Test Championship in order to keep it at five Tests, Mills shook his head.

“When boards can freely add cricket whenever they like it gets confusing for everyone and doesn’t have the same meaning,” he said.

“I don’t think it’s good enough when the players involved don’t understand how the system works. What chance do the fans have? It needs work and it can get better. But it has shown more interest in the Test game for the last 12-18 months.”

Mills urged the ICC to get all the member boards in a room and “lock the doors” to fix the problems facing the global game.

Scheduling issues, which he concedes have been amplified by Covid-19, are at the forefront of FICA’s work and have been since the players’ union was founded in 1998.

“Quite frankly, I think the ICC and the member boards need to step up and do something about it,” he continued.

“I don’t think we can continue to accept this notion of everyone acting in their own best interests and thinking that’s a good outcome for the game. Because it isn’t.

“It might mean that the bigger boards cannot play each other as often as they would like to… But is there a broader set of principles we can adopt so they play everyone a certain number of times over a period of time, whether that’s an eight or 10-year period?

It’s up to the ICC to show some leadership. A good starting point would be to get the key people in the room – perhaps locked for three or four days – and see what they can come up with.

“At the moment it just appears like everyone is acting in isolation and protecting their own interests… If we are truly interested in the global game then that is not the right approach.”

In a revealing piece for The Australian recently, Gideon Haigh wrote that Australia are “leaners not lifters” on the international stage.

Pressed on the notion of selfishness, Mills stopped short of singling out Cricket Australia, even though the men’s national team has not hosted Bangladesh for a Test tour since 2003, has failed to tour the West Indies since 2015 (and doesn’t have a trip planned) and has postponed series’ against Afghanistan, Bangladesh and South Africa in recent times.

Instead, he directed his criticism towards the ICC, which has a new chairman Greg Barclay, who lives about 20km away from Mills in Auckland and is on the record conceding the World Test Championship must “go back to the drawing board.”

“The reality is the ICC is a toothless tiger,” Mills said.

“We’ve had periods of time – we can go back to the big three takeover a few years ago – and it was made very clear to everyone that the ICC was there to organise one event per year, the umpires and the match referees.

“I think we’ve moved past that a bit now. I would like to think the ICC… would actually mandate the boards, which is effectively the ICC mandating themselves and the money around the ICC board table.

“Cricket is much bigger than its commercials. They are important but we need to look after one another first and foremost. That’s a really important point.”

Also on The Follow-On podcast, Mills discussed:

- Why Indians should be allowed to play in other T20 leagues around the world

- How the IPL can fit in with global tournaments

- Gender inequality

- ICC events and how the World Test Championship should be formatted

- The future of pink ball cricket and four-day Tests

- An update on FICA’s battle with the ICC over the commercial rights of players

Source : https://www.foxsports.com.au/cricke...t/news-story/c9194dc349f20e69d5a2bd0fda50576f
 
Why Indians should be allowed to play in other T20 leagues around the world
..
Not sure why this is an issue. India has a large player pool of players from other countries will miss out in case Indians are allowed to play other T20 leagues.

It is good that Indian players are not allowed.
 
..
Not sure why this is an issue. India has a large player pool of players from other countries will miss out in case Indians are allowed to play other T20 leagues.

It is good that Indian players are not allowed.

More people from India might watch if there are Indians playing in other leagues.

And it could be good for the Tier 2 or Tier 3 Indian players, who are not good enough for IPL, but might be good enough for other leagues.
 
I agree with the article. Big 3 are playing 5 match series and other teams are playing 2 match series :facepalm
 
The people that watch cricket in Australia want to watch Australia play England, some smaller boards want to make Australia play teams that the public don't want to watch and reduce the amount of people watching test cricket. Looks like a great plan to get more people watching cricket.
 
I agree with the article. Big 3 are playing 5 match series and other teams are playing 2 match series :facepalm

ECB and CA play mostly 2 match series. Before India was a powerhouse it was 3 match series at maximum.

BCCI plays 3 match series with SRL always home and away.
Same with SA 3 match series.
With NZ whenever we play home 3 match series.
If BD and Afghanistan Test Cricket improves a lot.. they will be one of the biggest beneficiaries they will get lots of series as well.

Other boards.. I mean e.g. Pakistan could have organised 3 test match series with SA and NZ.
But i guess they want to milk to cash cows of T20Is and ODIs.
 
The people that watch cricket in Australia want to watch Australia play England, some smaller boards want to make Australia play teams that the public don't want to watch and reduce the amount of people watching test cricket. Looks like a great plan to get more people watching cricket.

I agree. Here in Australia the general public attention is on Ashes. Even when India/SA/Pakistan tour there is some interest e.g. boxing day and Pink day in SCG are traditions irrespective of the teams playing.
Whenever Ashes is going on there is a different vibe in the pubs and parks and even in offices.
It helps that there are lot British Citizens working among us as well.
You cannot beat the history and interest that comes along with this.
 
ECB and CA play mostly 2 match series. Before India was a powerhouse it was 3 match series at maximum.

BCCI plays 3 match series with SRL always home and away.
Same with SA 3 match series.
With NZ whenever we play home 3 match series.
If BD and Afghanistan Test Cricket improves a lot.. they will be one of the biggest beneficiaries they will get lots of series as well.

Other boards.. I mean e.g. Pakistan could have organised 3 test match series with SA and NZ.
But i guess they want to milk to cash cows of T20Is and ODIs.

Didn't Pakistan ditch one of their tests against Australia for more limited overs matches.
 
More people from India might watch if there are Indians playing in other leagues.

And it could be good for the Tier 2 or Tier 3 Indian players, who are not good enough for IPL, but might be good enough for other leagues.

Yes but i dare say I allows players from Nepal etc to be picked and get more global oppurtunities.
Indias large player pool with oversaturate the T20 market.
 
I think The Ashes should stay at 5 tests. It’s tradition. The viewing numbers are usually good, even other fans take an interest in the series. And the quality of cricket is very good.
 
The people that watch cricket in Australia want to watch Australia play England, some smaller boards want to make Australia play teams that the public don't want to watch and reduce the amount of people watching test cricket. Looks like a great plan to get more people watching cricket.

Spoken like to true Aussie.

Its not about what people in Australia want to watch. Its about what people in the 9/10 test playing nations want to watch.

I guess the Ashes could still consist of 5 tests but could be played every 3 years. Something has got to give in.
 
Last edited:
Spoken like to true Aussie.

Its not about what people in Australia want to watch. Its about what people in the 9/10 test playing nations want to watch.

I guess the Ashes could still consist of 5 tests but could be played every 3 years. Something has got to give in.

If Australia have Afghanistan come for a test series then there will be crowds of about 5-6,000 going to watch, if it is England then there will be crowds of 35,000+ going to watch. Which one is better for cricket.

The current thinking seems to be if we reduce the number of people watching cricket and reduce the profits of the countries that do get crowds it will make cricket better.

If CA, ECB and BCCI have financial problems like WICB, CSA and SLC then cricket will be better.
 
If Australia have Afghanistan come for a test series then there will be crowds of about 5-6,000 going to watch, if it is England then there will be crowds of 35,000+ going to watch. Which one is better for cricket.

The current thinking seems to be if we reduce the number of people watching cricket and reduce the profits of the countries that do get crowds it will make cricket better.

If CA, ECB and BCCI have financial problems like WICB, CSA and SLC then cricket will be better.

Tangential question - what was the thinking behind reducing the Ashes from 6 test to 5 test series back in the 90s?
 
Spoken like to true Aussie.

Its not about what people in Australia want to watch. Its about what people in the 9/10 test playing nations want to watch.

I guess the Ashes could still consist of 5 tests but could be played every 3 years. Something has got to give in.

It is all about what Australians want to watch, we want to watch our team play the best in the world, if 9/10 test playing nations want to watch cricket in Australia then it will be what we want to watch.

Restricting the amount of money Australia makes from its own cricket will not help other boards, Ireland is not suddenly going to become a good test playing country just because Australia is forced to lose money.
 
The Ashes is the pinnacle of test cricket. Removing them from their prominent position in the test calendar damages the game as a whole.
 
Tangential question - what was the thinking behind reducing the Ashes from 6 test to 5 test series back in the 90s?

To keep the cricket schedule within limits, most players had to play Shield cricket on top of test cricket and players were not full time professionals so they had to take time off from their work.

Test match series has been the backbone of Australian cricket, without the Ashes cricket support in Australia will drop by at least half.

No one is stopping any of the other test playing nations from playing test matches, I cant see why NZ and Pakistan dont have a bilateral series every two years for a 5 match series. What is stopping them, Australia would be happy for them to do that.
 
Don't like the idea of Ashes series being reduced to 3 tests, not on board with this. In fact, from the Indian perspective, I would hate if the India-Australia and the India-England test series are reduced to 3 tests.

Test cricket is about the only format I follow with interest and even for a neutral like me, curtailing an iconic series like the Ashes does no good to the game.
 
If Australia have Afghanistan come for a test series then there will be crowds of about 5-6,000 going to watch, if it is England then there will be crowds of 35,000+ going to watch. Which one is better for cricket.

The current thinking seems to be if we reduce the number of people watching cricket and reduce the profits of the countries that do get crowds it will make cricket better.

If CA, ECB and BCCI have financial problems like WICB, CSA and SLC then cricket will be better.

It is all about what Australians want to watch, we want to watch our team play the best in the world, if 9/10 test playing nations want to watch cricket in Australia then it will be what we want to watch.

Restricting the amount of money Australia makes from its own cricket will not help other boards, Ireland is not suddenly going to become a good test playing country just because Australia is forced to lose money.

Don't like the idea of Ashes series being reduced to 3 tests, not on board with this. In fact, from the Indian perspective, I would hate if the India-Australia and the India-England test series are reduced to 3 tests.

Test cricket is about the only format I follow with interest and even for a neutral like me, curtailing an iconic series like the Ashes does no good to the game.

The problem is that league cricket over the world is increasing in size which is a cash cow for players. Faf just retired. I predict that retirements of more big players are on the way.

Nobody wants to see an Aus/Afghan test series at this stage, but it would be nice to see more of Aus/NZ, Aus/SA, Aus/SL and Aus/Pak. Lower grade teams like SL and Pak can get a crack against Australia for a 2 test series at least once in 2 years. It will help their players develop their game as playing down under in the toughest for Asian teams.

I dont think it will have a huge impact on cash reserves of the Austalian board as India will be visiting them for a 4 test series once every 2 years. Boards just need to stop being greedy and help the game of cricket evolve.
 
Back
Top