'Good' cholesterol isn't that good for you after all

[s28]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en-gb"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">'Good' cholesterol might not even exist <a href="https://t.co/x1Cr2OW6QJ">pic.twitter.com/x1Cr2OW6QJ</a></p>— Business Insider (@businessinsider) <a href="https://twitter.com/businessinsider/status/901577503063515136">26 August 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[mmkextreme_1]

Wow, that is interesting.

The fact that we have always been programmed to believe that higher levels of HDL cholesterol are good and decrease the chances of heart disease. If this turns out to be true, it's going to cause a major shift in the medical and pharmaceutical fields.

 

[finalfantasy7]

i find it funny that people believe in every study which comes out - then every few years they come out with another study which contradicts the previous study.

Funny enough amount of people who ready studies in daily mail or the sun her in the UK - knowing these so called newspapers are rubbish. yet people believe the.


Look at how many people drink lucazade and think its good for them - all that sugar or so called glucose - after working out/playing sports.

The health industry will always keep changing their minds on such matters

 

[PetroDollars]

i find it funny that people believe in every study which comes out - then every few years they come out with another study which contradicts the previous study.

Funny enough amount of people who ready studies in daily mail or the sun her in the UK - knowing these so called newspapers are rubbish. yet people believe the.


Look at how many people drink lucazade and think its good for them - all that sugar or so called glucose - after working out/playing sports.

The health industry will always keep changing their minds on such matters

Its mainly because food companies sponsor and fund these studies for there own benefit.

Just like Kellongs sponsored studied in the 70s/80s to claim fats are bad so people come off meat for breakfast and have cereal instead.

 

[finalfantasy7]

Its mainly because food companies sponsor and fund these studies for there own benefit.

Just like Kellongs sponsored studied in the 70s/80s to claim fats are bad so people come off meat for breakfast and have cereal instead.

I completely understand, how do we the consumer know which so called study is being backed by food companies or other self interest companies