What's new

Greta Thunberg - young Climate Change activist being attacked by Trump and on Fox News

Methane is one of the largest contributing gases to the Ozone layer hole. The number 1 contributor of methane gas is cattle. Not a human act, but a natural occurrence of a gas.

I am saying that climate change is a natural cycle and that governments will find any old excuse to tax the poor while instilling fear into society.

Cattle were domesticated by humans, and only have such a large population due to human demand for meat and milk. Take New Zealand for example, we have around 11 million cows (compared to under 5 million humans) even though cows are not even native to this country.

Methane is an agricultural emission, and not only depletes the Ozone layer, but is in fact the second-largest greenhouse gas, and its impact on global temperature rise is 28x worse than carbon dioxide. Nitrous oxide, the third-largest greenhouse gas, is also produced from agriculture, and it is 300x worse than carbon dioxide
 
That's what happens you copy&paste stuff without understanding what it says. Read the pie-chart again, it includes transport and electricity on it too. Both of these are demand-based user entities.

Policy makers have already made RE, EV available to public. Why are you not buying a Tesla and installing solar cells on your house?

And this is what happens when you're unrealistic.

How many people can afford a Tesla? Forget Tesla find me any electric vehicle for AU$2500 and I'll buy it right now. The electric vehicle market isn't as mainstream as you are making it out to be. And yes I did read transport there but switching to electric cars isn't affordable and there's not enough options. You have to give people alternatives before you criticize them for their commuting options. Also criticizing people for moving to cities is just unbelievable.

I have to ask which world are you living in? The whole world is dependent on electricity and you want everyone to just switch off and go back to the dark ages lol. Provide alternatives and be realistic. I've already mentioned multiple renewable/clean sources of energy which are already in use in many countries of the world. It is just a matter of implementation and not getting bullied by energy and oil companies.

Oh, and mind you I do use solar panels at my house so keep your judgements to yourself.
 
That's precisely what I'm saying. You can't stop anyone legally from choosing comfort/money over environment, whether that is at individual, business or government level.

But I never said that you should forcibly prevent anyone from choosing comfort/money over environment. If you actually read the rest of the post which you left unbolded, I said specifically it takes time to educate people as to why they need to give up some things for the environment, I even gave the example of free carrier bags to make this point.

Climate change and the environment isn't an issue for individual govts, it is a global issue at the end of the day. If the govts in South America decide it is ok to burn down the rain forests for the good of their own economy, it will affect everyone at some point.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Keep up the great work Kellie! <a href="https://t.co/PcAnK009EW">https://t.co/PcAnK009EW</a></p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1179710734030249984?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
I think a bit more knowledge of the subject would have completely changed your perspective.

https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions
According to the US Environmental Protection Agency commercial and residential activities only contribute about 12% of all greenhouse gas emissions. Hence disproving you point about a change in lifestyle being necessary.

What we need a change in, is the source of our energy. Fossil fuels aren't gonna last forever and their use causes climate change too hence we have to move towards cleaner/renewable sources of energy like hydrogen/wind/solar/tidal/hydroelectric/nuclear etc. These transitions don't require people's will. They require the collective effort of the millionaires, billionaires and policy-makers of this world so that their funding can be invested into R&D for developing more efficient/cleaner/renewable processes for energy generation and large-scale effective implementation of these technologies in everyday lives of the people. If companies keep worrying about their quarterly target profits then just the people's will can't do jack about anything. Hence policy-makers deserve the blame that they get.

Governments can introduce policy instruments to persuade market changes. For example the UK government encouraged people to purchase PV panels and sell energy back to the grid. This encouraged British citizens to install 800,000 generators in twenty years.

The Duchy of Cornwall in SW UK is now producing 33% of consumed power from renewables - wind turbines, solar farms and energy from waste incineration. Geothermal power from deep radioactive ‘hot rocks’ is on the way, and an onshore wind farm and tidal lagoon in attempt to go carbon-neutral by 2030.

Eventually the market will dictate a change to renewables, particularly as oil and gas run out.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Why do so many men find Greta Thunberg triggering? Two researchers explain the stereotypical labels deployed by critics to undermine her. <a href="https://t.co/6kIcUte1ic">https://t.co/6kIcUte1ic</a></p>— The Conversation (@ConversationUK) <a href="https://twitter.com/ConversationUK/status/1178908037333110784?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Thanks for the insight, but sadly for the scaremongers, Greenhouse gasses are not causing climate change, genius.

Do you even know why Carbon Dioxide is called a greenhouse gas?
It causes the greenhouse effect which is a cause of climate change.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas

I mean...I didn't even need to go to Google Scholar.
I just assumed Wikipedia should be enough for certified illiterates.

It's getting harder and harder to take you seriously.
 
Switzerland Election - Green Party Is On The Rise

Climate change has risen to the top of Switzerland's political agenda and observers are eyeing a possible "green tsunami" in 20 October elections.

For decades Switzerland has been dominated by four main parties; the Swiss People's Party, the Social Democrats, the Radical Party and the Christian Democrats.

But as the glaciers melt, the president of the Green party's youth wing sees an opportunity.

"This is our year," says Maja Haus.

"There is a climate crisis, and for the Green party this is a huge chance, because we have the answers to this problem: 2019 will be the climate elections."

How big is the green wave?
In the run-up to the vote the Green party has overtaken the Christian Democrats in the opinion polls. If those polls translate into seats, the Christian Democrats' place in Switzerland's seven-member government looks shaky.

Including the more fiscally conservative Green Liberals, who are also polling well, greens could be a significant force in parliament. Latest opinion polls give them a combined 18% of the vote, a comfortable second place.

But this election is about more than just a rise in support for green parties. "There was a lot going on in Switzerland during the last year," says Fabian Molina, who at the age of 29 is already a member of parliament for the Social Democrats.

"We had a women's strike, we had a climate strike, people want change."

In June this year hundreds of thousands of women across Switzerland took to the streets to call for equal pay and conditions, and an end to discrimination.

It was, the Swiss Trades Union Federation said, the biggest political demonstration Switzerland had ever seen.

All year climate strikes have been taking place, culminating in a huge rally in Berne in September, with 100,000 people taking part.

The protests are a sign, says political analyst Barbara Perriard, that voters are energised, and some voters in particular.

"We have a lot more women candidates this year," she says. "An increase of 40% on the last elections. And we have more than 450 candidates who were not eligible to vote in 2015, so that means young citizens want to participate in politics."

How has climate change influenced young candidates?
Among those standing is 21-year-old Alicia Badnod. For her, climate change and the environment are the top issues.

She is not standing for the Green party, but rather as an independent because, she believes, young people have lost '"hope in the mainstream parties".

Kelmy Martinez, also 21, is taking a different approach.

He too puts climate at the top of his political priorities, but he is standing for the Social Democrats, one of Switzerland's oldest parties, and currently the second biggest in parliament.

What is striking is that key issues that have mobilised Swiss voters in the past, specifically immigration, and relations with the European Union, are just not cutting through with these young people.

Alicia remembers being put off, during the last election in 2015, by the focus, particularly from the right-wing Swiss People's Party, on the dangers of immigration.

"It's easier to tell someone you are scared," she explains, "and then to tell them we will make your fears disappear, but the reality of Europe right now is multicultural."

Is Swiss populism in decline?
The Swiss People's Party remains the largest in parliament. It has campaigned for over a decade on two key messages: restrictions on immigration and asylum seekers, and limiting non-EU member Switzerland's ties with Brussels.

When President Donald Trump's former adviser Steve Bannon came to Zurich last year, he praised Switzerland, and the Swiss People's Party, for being the cradle of populism. But this year, even among older voters, other issues seem more important: the cost of healthcare, pensions and, again, climate change.

When the People's Party unveiled an eye-catching campaign poster, showing a perfect Swiss red apple being eaten by worms, one of which wore the blue flag and gold stars of the EU, there was widespread criticism, even from within the party.

Still the party hopes to retain a big share of the vote and has, some would say belatedly, come out with a policy on climate change, one that will appeal to its traditional supporters in the farming community.

"What we believe would be beneficial for the climate is that people buy local," says People's Party member of parliament Andreas Ott. "And buy seasonal, that is one of the main levers for the Swiss to reduce our climate footprint."

Who will win?
When all the votes are counted on Sunday, there will be, as ever in Switzerland, no outright winner. The entire system is designed, explains political scientist Andreas Ladner, to give all views a voice, but no single party too much power.

"If you want to understand the Swiss system you have to know this culture. We are a small country. We don't like strong leaders. It is more important to integrate everybody, into government, into political responsibilities."

There will be no green tsunami, then, but, if the polls are right, a drop in votes for the Swiss People's Party, and an increase for the Greens.

No big overnight change, but a gradual shift towards more environmental policies. Many eager new members of parliament, and the old, will have to work together, to find compromises. It's the Swiss way, and suggests Andreas Ladner with a wry smile, it might "be an example for other countries".

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-49926929.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Activist <a href="https://twitter.com/GretaThunberg?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@GretaThunberg</a> rallies in Canada ahead of an election in which climate change is a hot topic <a href="https://t.co/37UxJ1bVYl">https://t.co/37UxJ1bVYl</a> <a href="https://t.co/PMjtHNVMYi">pic.twitter.com/PMjtHNVMYi</a></p>— Reuters Top News (@Reuters) <a href="https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1185371234948665344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 19, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Do you even know why Carbon Dioxide is called a greenhouse gas?
It causes the greenhouse effect which is a cause of climate change.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas

I mean...I didn't even need to go to Google Scholar.
I just assumed Wikipedia should be enough for certified illiterates.

It's getting harder and harder to take you seriously.

METHANE

Look it up and get a refund from your school.
 
Thousands Take Part in Brazil to Clean Up Beaches From Spilled Oil and Tar

Thousands of people have taken part in a huge clean-up operation to remove oil and tar from beaches along Brazil's north-eastern coast. Volunteers, as well as government workers, used wheelbarrows, spades and plastic gloves to remove the thick tar from the sand and water.

The source of the spill, which was first detected on 2 September, remains a mystery. It has affected wildlife and popular beaches including Praia do Futuro in Ceará, Maragogi in Alagoas, and Itacaré and Ilhéus in Bahia.

At least 15 sea turtles, two seabirds and one fish have been found dead, the environmental agency Ibama said. Experts say this could be the worst disaster for the region's coral reefs.

It was not clear if the volume of oil was increasing or decreasing and how long the problem, which has affected 187 places in nine states, will last.

On Thursday, Ibama President Eduardo Bim said tests had proved the crude oil was produced in Venezuela but officials had not been able to identify the vessel responsible for the leak.

This did not mean that Venezuela was responsible for the leak, he added, describing the case as "unprecedented". Venezuela, however, has denied responsibility for the oil.

The incident is more challenging than a typical oil spill because the dense crude is not floating on the surface and only appears when it washes up on shore, Mr Bim was quoted by Reuters news agency as saying.

Floating barriers usually employed to prevent oil from washing ashore have little effect, for example, so the work has been focused on cleaning up the crude as it comes to the coast.

In Pernambuco state, 30 tonnes of oil were removed from beaches on Saturday alone.

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors have accused the federal government of failing to organise a response, saying the spill has caused environmental damage in an area spanning 2,100km (1,300 miles).

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-50113383.
 
Green parties have made strong gains in Switzerland's parliamentary election, according to initial projections.

The anti-immigration Swiss People's Party (SVP) is set to remain the largest party, despite losing at least 3% of its support.

But projections show a combined vote for the two green parties of around 20%.

Their gains reflect voters' concerns over climate change, seen as the dominant issue in this election.

Not all votes have been counted yet but the national broadcaster projected the Green Party's share surged 5.6 points to 12.7% of the vote, while the smaller, more centrist Green Liberal Party (GLP) garnered 7.6%.

The Green Party looked set to overtake one of the parties in the coalition government, the Christian Democrats (CVP), and could for the first time get a seat in the coalition that governs Switzerland.

"It is not a green wave, it is a tsunami, a hurricane," deputy party leader Celina Vara told Swiss radio.

The centre-left Socialists looked set to take second place with 16.5% of the votes, and the centre-right Liberals (FDP) were on track to come in third with 15.2%.

If the two Green parties are able to overcome policy differences and unite, they would represent a potent political force.

As is usual in Switzerland, no single party is expected to secure a majority.

For decades, the seven-seat Federal Council has been dominated by the same four main parties: the SVP, the Social Democrats, the FDP liberals and the CVP, says the BBC's Imogen Foulkes in Geneva.

The SVP, which is set to remain the largest party in parliament, has campaigned for over a decade on two key messages: restrictions on immigration and asylum seekers, and limiting non-EU member Switzerland's ties with Brussels.

But these issues were scarcely mentioned in the election campaign, and climate change dominated as the single most important issue.

All year, climate strikes have been taking place in the country, culminating in a huge rally in Bern in September that drew 100,000 people.

The Swiss have only to look up to see the effects of climate change: the Alpine glaciers are melting, and rock and mud slides are threatening mountain communities, our correspondent says.

But the election campaign was about more than just a rise in support for green parties.

A record 40% of candidates for the national council were women (as were more than a third of those standing for the second house, the chamber of states).

In June this year, hundreds of thousands of women across Switzerland took to the streets to call for equal pay and conditions, and an end to discrimination.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50116400.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The beetle is less than 1mm long, has no eyes or wings, but has two long pigtail-like antennae <a href="https://t.co/Ww3we6DOAG">https://t.co/Ww3we6DOAG</a></p>— Sky News (@SkyNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1187992074559340544?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
What's your evidence that global warming and climate change isn't happenning outside the usual cycle?

The term Global Warming died a quick death and re-branded to Climate Change.

Sun and Moon effect our climate, and how Methane is one of the of the biggest contributors (if not the biggest) to *greenhouse* gases. It's ALL NATURAL.

Get over it, you should be studying instead of falling for hoaxes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The term Global Warming died a quick death and re-branded to Climate Change.

Sun and Moon effect our climate, and how Methane is one of the of the biggest contributors (if not the biggest) to *greenhouse* gases. It's ALL NATURAL.

Get over it, you should be studying instead of falling for hoaxes.

Can you please cite me the scientific journal articles that prove that the sun and moon are the main reason our climate is warming these days? The fact is that these days, the sun is actually getting cooler.

Also, yes methane is a huge contributor to climate change, but are you really that naive to think methane emissions are something natural? Methane is the result of humans farming millions of cattle all around the world. If cattle were not farm animals, they would not be so numerous, we are the ones who helped their populations explode.

I have done actual research, made a conference paper, and have done extensive review of climate change literature, I know what I'm talking about. You can't just call the efforts of thousands of climate scientists and engineers worldwide a 'hoax'.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The term Global Warming died a quick death and re-branded to Climate Change.

Sun and Moon effect our climate, and how Methane is one of the of the biggest contributors (if not the biggest) to *greenhouse* gases. It's ALL NATURAL.

Get over it, you should be studying instead of falling for hoaxes.

You do realise that it's called climate change because the climate will change/is changing due to global warming.

Did you every study chemistry? You are the one that needs to study instead of falling to dumb conspiracy theories.

Carbon dioxide, methane, and halocarbons are greenhouse gases that absorb a wide range of energy—including infrared energy (heat) emitted by the Earth—and then re-emit it. The re-emitted energy travels out in all directions, but some returns to Earth, where it heats the surface. As the concentration of these gases increase more energy is absorbed and the surface temperature of the Earth rises.

Another greenhouse gas is Nitrous Oxide (NO2). This is mainly produced in carbon fired power plants and in combustion engines.

If there were no greenhouse gases then the Earth would be a ball of ice.

Yes there are cycles where the Earth cools and heats, but it never gets this bad. People have been living in the Balochistan and interior Sindh region of Pakistan for thousanss of years, but it has never been almost uninhabitable. These places are on the verge of being impossible to live in. It is predicted that Pakistan, Iran and many parts of India will be uninhabitable in the near future.

All these facts have been thoroughly researced and backed by experiments and knowledgable scientists who have spent their whole lives studying this. How much research and experiments have you done. Are you even any type of scientist or actually did well in science subjects that you can be so sure Climate change is a hoax.

Let me guess, you also believe in the Flat Earth and anti-vax movements.
 
Greta Thunberg has turned down an environmental award and prize money because "the climate movement does not need any more awards".

She said the offer was a "great honour" and thanked the Nordic Council, which said it respected her decision.

But, she said, "politicians and the people in power" need to listen to the "current, best-available science".

Ms Thunberg was this year's favourite to win the Nobel Peace Prize, but the award went to Ethiopia's Abiy Ahmed.

In an Instagram post explaining her decision to turn down the prize money of 500,000 kronor (£40,000; €46,000), Ms Thunberg said: "The Nordic countries have a great reputation around the world when it comes to climate and environmental issues.

"There is no lack of bragging about this. There is no lack of beautiful words."

But she said Nordic energy consumption told "a whole other story".

She referenced a report from from WWF and the Global Footprint Network, which says Sweden, along with most of the Nordic region, lives as if the world has the resources of four planets.

The gap between what science said was needed to limit a global temperature increase and what was being implemented was "gigantic", said Ms Thunberg.

"We belong to the countries that have the possibility to do the most. And yet our countries still basically do nothing," she added.

The president of the Nordic Council, Hans Wallmark, said the organisation respected Greta Thunberg's decision and called her movement "a good cause for everyone".

He said the council - which encourages co-operation between parliaments in countries including Denmark, Finland and Ms Thunberg's home country Sweden - would think carefully about what to do with the prize money.


Who else has turned down an award?

Jean-Paul Sartre refused the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1964. He said he "always declined official honours" as he did not want to be "turned into an institution"

Musician David Bowie turned down a CBE in the UK in 2000 and a knighthood in 2003. He told The Sun: "I would never have any intention of accepting anything like that. I seriously don't know what it's for"

Vietnamese politician Le Duc Tho was jointly offered the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 with US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger for negotiating an armistice in Vietnam. Tho refused the award as the war between Vietnam and the USA was ongoing, and he accused Kissinger of violating a truce

"It's not what I spent my life working for," David Bowie said of a knighthood

Author Virginia Woolf declined the Companion of Honour in 1935 and honorary degrees from Manchester and Liverpool as she considered awards a symptom of the patriarchy

British poet Benjamin Zephaniah refused an OBE honour (standing for Order of the British Empire) in 2003 as the word "empire" reminded him of "slavery" and "thousands of years of brutality", he told The Guardian. There have been calls to change the name of the title

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50232491
 
Leonardo DiCaprio was impressed when he met Greta Thunberg.

The actor shared a picture of himself with the climate change activist on Instagram.

He wrote he hoped "Greta's message is a wake-up call to world leaders everywhere" and that the "time for inaction is over."

He also praised the teenager for her work and said because of her he is "optimistic about what the future holds".

The image has had almost 4 million likes since it was posted 22 hours ago.

Greta Thunberg has helped start an international youth movement against climate change.

The Swedish teenager first staged a "School Strike for Climate" in front of the Swedish Parliament in August last year.

Her strike has inspired students from around the world, leading tens of thousands of students from Germany, Japan, the UK, Australia and many more to join her #FridaysforFuture demonstrations.

Leo wrote: "There are few times in human history where voices are amplified at such pivotal moments and in such transformational ways but @GretaThunberg has become a leader of our time.

"History will judge us for what we do today to help guarantee that future generations can enjoy the same liveable planet that we have so clearly taken for granted."

The Hollywood star has also been outspoken about environmental issues.

He told Newsbeat in 2016 he thinks climate change is the biggest issue facing young people today.

He has a foundation which describes itself as being dedicated to addressing climate change and environmental threats to life on Earth.

His organisation recently put $5m (£4.1m) towards helping the Amazon rainforest after the recent outbreak of fires there.

He said it was "an honor to spend time with Greta. She and I have made a commitment to support one another, in hopes of securing a brighter future for our planet."

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-50273938.
 
Greta Thunberg stranded as climate summit moves from Chile to Spain

Without further ado, Ms Thunberg tore up the South American leg of her itinerary. “I’ll need some help,” she tweeted. “It turns out I’ve travelled half (sic) around the world, the wrong way. Now I need to find a way to cross the Atlantic in November. If anyone could help me find transport I would be so grateful.”

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/...te-summit-moves-from-chile-to-spain-23zc87jd2

:))) Perhaps she should not have bunked school and stayed in class to learn how to read a map.

This is the problem with people who believe this hoax, blame solves nothing, solutions are required not, scapegoats and accusations. Now she is stranded tying to hitch hike her way to a climate summit on eco friendly transport.

Someone needs to introduce video conferencing to her! :)))
 
Greta Thunberg stranded as climate summit moves from Chile to Spain



https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/...te-summit-moves-from-chile-to-spain-23zc87jd2

:))) Perhaps she should not have bunked school and stayed in class to learn how to read a map.

This is the problem with people who believe this hoax, blame solves nothing, solutions are required not, scapegoats and accusations. Now she is stranded tying to hitch hike her way to a climate summit on eco friendly transport.

Someone needs to introduce video conferencing to her! :)))

Sure, but then why don't you trust the science, and why do you decide to believe that climate change is a hoax based on politics? For the few politicians playing the blame game, there are many scientists and regular people proposing and pushing for solutions.

Of course, it's because you want to believe in pseudo-science because it fits your political beliefs better. Why don't you answer my question from above? Where are the scientific journal articles that conclusively prove that climate change is not caused by humans, rather, it's caused by the sun and moon?
 
Greta Thunberg stranded as climate summit moves from Chile to Spain



https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/...te-summit-moves-from-chile-to-spain-23zc87jd2

:))) Perhaps she should not have bunked school and stayed in class to learn how to read a map.

This is the problem with people who believe this hoax, blame solves nothing, solutions are required not, scapegoats and accusations. Now she is stranded tying to hitch hike her way to a climate summit on eco friendly transport.

Someone needs to introduce video conferencing to her! :)))

I’ve been so mistaken calling you Intellectual Heavyweight.

I apologise for any offence. I was totally wrong.

From now on you’ll be known as The Genuis

What’s your alma mater? Must Imperial or Oxbridge? Probably Harvard. Am I right?
 
The term Global Warming died a quick death and re-branded to Climate Change.

Sun and Moon effect our climate, and how Methane is one of the of the biggest contributors (if not the biggest) to *greenhouse* gases. It's ALL NATURAL.

Get over it, you should be studying instead of falling for hoaxes.

What should we study?

I for one can’t wait for you to present the scientific papers Hussain requested from you.

On a side note, are you familiar with the Dunning-Kruger effect?
 
The United States has formally notified the United Nations of its intention to withdraw from the Paris Agreement.

The notification begins a one-year process of exiting the global climate change accord, culminating the day after the 2020 US election.

The agreement brought together 188 nations to combat climate change.

Announcing the plan last month, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the agreement had imposed an "unfair economic burden" on the United States.

The Paris agreement committed the US and 187 other countries to keeping rising global temperatures below 2C above pre-industrial levels and attempting to limit them even more, to a 1.5C rise.

The decision to withdraw - taken by President Donald Trump - made the US the world's sole non-signatory and prompted high-level efforts by the European Union to keep the agreement on track.

A report issued in December 2018 by the Institute of International and European Affairs suggested President Trump's decision to leave had done "very real damage" to the Paris agreement, creating "moral and political cover for others to follow suit".

The report cited the examples of Russia and Turkey, which both declined to ratify the deal despite signing.

The US issued its formal notification on the first day it was possible to do so, firing the starting gun on the long process of extricating the country from the 2015 agreement. The withdrawal is still subject to the outcome of next year's US presidential election - if Mr Trump loses, the winner may decide to change course.

But scientists and environmentalists fear the effect the Trump administration will have on climate protections in the meantime. It has conducted what critics have called a seek-and-destroy mission against US environmental legislation.

Mr Trump promised to turn the US into an energy superpower, and has attempted to sweep away a raft of pollution legislation to reduce the cost of producing gas, oil and coal. He characterised former US President Barack Obama’s environmental clean-up plans as a war on American energy.

Announcing his decision to withdraw, last year, Mr Trump said: "I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris. I promised I would exit or re-negotiate any deal which fails to serve America's interests."

But reports suggest the Trump administration made no effort to renegotiate the Paris agreement, waiting instead until the first possible day to exit.

The US contributes about 15% of global emissions of carbon, but it is also a significant source of finance and technology for developing countries in their efforts to fight rising temperatures.

What was agreed in Paris?
Climate change, or global warming, refers to the damaging effect of gases, or emissions, released from industry and agriculture on the atmosphere. The Paris accord is meant to limit the global rise in temperature attributed to emissions.

Countries agreed to:

Keep global temperatures "well below" the level of 2C (3.6F) above pre-industrial times and "endeavour to limit" them even more, to 1.5C
Limit the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by human activity to the same levels that trees, soil and oceans can absorb naturally, beginning at some point between 2050 and 2100
Review each country's contribution to cutting emissions every five years so they scale up to the challenge
Enable rich countries to help poorer nations by providing "climate finance" to adapt to climate change and switch to renewable energy

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50297029.
 
Actually this situation perfectly illustrates the utter stupidity and hypocrisy of travelling halfway around the world just to attend a conference on the issue of cutting carbon emissions, in a yacht built from carbon fibre. I mean forget carbon footprint, Greta was travelling half way round the globe, in a carbon shoe, the wrong way! :)))

The teenager savior of the planet cannot get from A to B because she is so busy hanging out with Hollywood stars. Then again, why doesn't she just ask Leo if she can borrow his private jet to fly to the climate-change summit? :)))
 
Actually this situation perfectly illustrates the utter stupidity and hypocrisy of travelling halfway around the world just to attend a conference on the issue of cutting carbon emissions, in a yacht built from carbon fibre. I mean forget carbon footprint, Greta was travelling half way round the globe, in a carbon shoe, the wrong way! :)))

The teenager savior of the planet cannot get from A to B because she is so busy hanging out with Hollywood stars. Then again, why doesn't she just ask Leo if she can borrow his private jet to fly to the climate-change summit? :)))

Is this an excerpt from the research papers you were alluding to for us to study?
 
Actually this situation perfectly illustrates the utter stupidity and hypocrisy of travelling halfway around the world just to attend a conference on the issue of cutting carbon emissions, in a yacht built from carbon fibre. I mean forget carbon footprint, Greta was travelling half way round the globe, in a carbon shoe, the wrong way! :)))

The teenager savior of the planet cannot get from A to B because she is so busy hanging out with Hollywood stars. Then again, why doesn't she just ask Leo if she can borrow his private jet to fly to the climate-change summit? :)))

Why do you keep dodging the question? Where are the scientific research papers that support your claims?

Greta is irrelevant in all this. The original message she had was correct. Who wrote her speeches and how she decides to spend her time is another matter. What is relevant to all this is the science of climate change. So please, send us those scientific journal articles that support your claims, that's all we're asking.
 
Why do you keep dodging the question? Where are the scientific research papers that support your claims?

Greta is irrelevant in all this. The original message she had was correct. Who wrote her speeches and how she decides to spend her time is another matter. What is relevant to all this is the science of climate change. So please, send us those scientific journal articles that support your claims, that's all we're asking.

The paper is called Dunning-Kruger.
 
Poor girl is being used by influencial green energy investors to further their cause and force Western Governments to open their wallets and spend heavy in the green sector similar to the wind turbine boom and massive electrial vehicles rebates of 2010 and 2011.

22 of the top 30 most polluted cities are India and 26 out 50 most polluted cities are in China yet western workers are forced to pay the price for this travesty.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...t-polluted-cities-india-china-intl/index.html
 
All these scientists must be part of the hoax too.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Climate crisis: 11,000 scientists warn of ‘untold suffering’ <a href="https://t.co/xnD2CfTt1c">https://t.co/xnD2CfTt1c</a></p>— The Guardian (@guardian) <a href="https://twitter.com/guardian/status/1191742501692026881?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 5, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
2019 Ozone Hole is the Smallest on Record Since Its Discovery

The annual ozone hole reached its peak extent of 6.3 million square miles (16. 4 million square kilometers) on Sept. 8, and then shrank to less than 3.9 million square miles (10 million square kilometers) for the remainder of September and October, according to NASA and NOAA satellite measurements. During years with normal weather conditions, the ozone hole typically grows to a maximum area of about 8 million square miles in late September or early October.

“It’s great news for ozone in the Southern Hemisphere,” said Paul Newman, chief scientist for Earth Sciences at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. “But it’s important to recognize that what we’re seeing this year is due to warmer stratospheric temperatures. It’s not a sign that atmospheric ozone is suddenly on a fast track to recovery.”

Ozone is a highly reactive molecule comprised of three oxygen atoms that occurs naturally in small amounts. Roughly seven to 25 miles above Earth’s surface, in a layer of the atmosphere called the stratosphere, the ozone layer is a sunscreen, shielding the planet from potentially harmful ultraviolet radiation that can cause skin cancer and cataracts, suppress immune systems and also damage plants.

The Antarctic ozone hole forms during the Southern Hemisphere’s late winter as the returning Sun’s rays start ozone-depleting reactions. These reactions involve chemically active forms of chlorine and bromine derived from man-made compounds. The chemistry that leads to their formation involves chemical reactions that occur on the surfaces of cloud particles that form in cold stratospheric layers, leading ultimately to runaway reactions that destroy ozone molecules. In warmer temperatures fewer polar stratospheric clouds form and they don’t persist as long, limiting the ozone-depletion process.

NASA and NOAA monitor the ozone hole via complementary instrumental methods.

Satellites, including NASA’s Aura satellite, the NASA-NOAA Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership satellite and NOAA’s Joint Polar Satellite System NOAA-20 satellite, measure ozone from space. The Aura satellite’s Microwave Limb Sounder also estimates levels of ozone-destroying chlorine in the stratosphere.

At the South Pole, NOAA staff launch weather balloons carrying ozone-measuring “sondes” which directly sample ozone levels vertically through the atmosphere. Most years, at least some levels of the stratosphere, the region of the upper atmosphere where the largest amounts of ozone are normally found, are found to be completely devoid of ozone.

“This year, ozonesonde measurements at the South Pole did not show any portions of the atmosphere where ozone was completely depleted,” said atmospheric scientist Bryan Johnson at NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado.

Uncommon but not unprecedented

This is the third time in the last 40 years that weather systems have caused warm temperatures that limit ozone depletion, said Susan Strahan, an atmospheric scientist with Universities Space Research Association, who works at NASA Goddard. Similar weather patterns in the Antarctic stratosphere in September 1988 and 2002 also produced atypically small ozone holes, she said.

“It’s a rare event that we’re still trying to understand,” said Strahan. “If the warming hadn’t happened, we’d likely be looking at a much more typical ozone hole.”

There is no identified connection between the occurrence of these unique patterns and changes in climate.

The weather systems that disrupted the 2019 ozone hole are typically modest in September, but this year they were unusually strong, dramatically warming the Antarctic’s stratosphere during the pivotal time for ozone destruction. At an altitude of about 12 miles (20 kilometers), temperatures during September were 29 degrees F (16˚C) warmer than average, the warmest in the 40-year historical record for September by a wide margin. In addition, these weather systems also weakened the Antarctic polar vortex, knocking it off its normal center over the South Pole and reducing the strong September jet stream around Antarctica from a mean speed of 161 miles per hour to a speed of 67 miles per hour. This slowing vortex rotation allowed air to sink in the lower stratosphere where ozone depletion occurs, where it had two impacts.

First, the sinking warmed the Antarctic lower stratosphere, minimizing the formation and persistence of the polar stratospheric clouds that are a main ingredient in the ozone-destroying process. Second, the strong weather systems brought ozone-rich air from higher latitudes elsewhere in the Southern Hemisphere to the area above the Antarctic ozone hole. These two effects led to much higher than normal ozone levels over Antarctica compared to ozone hole conditions usually present since the mid 1980s.

As of October 16 2019, the ozone hole above Antarctica remained small but stable and is expected to gradually dissipate in the coming weeks.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...is-the-smallest-on-record-since-its-discovery

The above is from NASA. 16th October 2019. A mere 2 weeks ago.

Alas! Greta is en-route to a selfie near you, in a carbon shoe.

:)))
 
Last edited:
People using Greta to dismiss climate change is like the following:

1) India uses pellet guns in Kashmir , with many including children blinded

2) Maliha Lodhi (?) uses a picture not from Kashmir to show India's use of such bullets

3) People claim that no one was blinded because the picture was fake


Just because a person exaggerates or is hypocritical over an issue, that does not invalidate the actual issue itself
 
People using Greta to dismiss climate change is like the following:

1) India uses pellet guns in Kashmir , with many including children blinded

2) Maliha Lodhi (?) uses a picture not from Kashmir to show India's use of such bullets

3) People claim that no one was blinded because the picture was fake


Just because a person exaggerates or is hypocritical over an issue, that does not invalidate the actual issue itself

Excellent analogies!
 
2019 Ozone Hole is the Smallest on Record Since Its Discovery



https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...is-the-smallest-on-record-since-its-discovery

The above is from NASA. 16th October 2019. A mere 2 weeks ago.

Alas! Greta is en-route to a selfie near you, in a carbon shoe.

:)))

Did you even read the article, and do you even understand anything about the ozone layer? It's depletion or restoration has very little to do with climate change. The reason it's restoring is because humans have largely stopped using cluorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in aerosols and refrigeration. CFCs react with ozone in the atmosphere in the presence of UV radiation from the sun. Since there are less CFCs, less of these reactions take place, hence ozone is now restoring. Ozone has very little to do with warming.

Oh, and you've dodged the question again. Where are the scientific journal articles that support your theories?
 
I read somewhere she has become a PR prop for celebs and politicians and I have to agree. And she is milking the attention. Good for her
 
Actually this situation perfectly illustrates the utter stupidity and hypocrisy of travelling halfway around the world just to attend a conference on the issue of cutting carbon emissions, in a yacht built from carbon fibre. I mean forget carbon footprint, Greta was travelling half way round the globe, in a carbon shoe, the wrong way! :)))

The teenager savior of the planet cannot get from A to B because she is so busy hanging out with Hollywood stars. Then again, why doesn't she just ask Leo if she can borrow his private jet to fly to the climate-change summit? :)))

Will she be burning the Boat? Perhaps educate yourself before commenting, as such comments are just embarrassing and show that you have absolutely no understanding of any science.

Do you even know what combustion is?
 
Will she be burning the Boat? Perhaps educate yourself before commenting, as such comments are just embarrassing and show that you have absolutely no understanding of any science.

Do you even know what combustion is?

Just so you know two sailors were flown over to sail her boat back, they used a total of 4 flights to prevent her from flying over.

It was a media stunt by her handlers to sail her over and have four flights to move sailors on the boat to make it look like they were reducing the carbon footprint.
 
Just so you know two sailors were flown over to sail her boat back, they used a total of 4 flights to prevent her from flying over.

It was a media stunt by her handlers to sail her over and have four flights to move sailors on the boat to make it look like they were reducing the carbon footprint.

But that guy's saying the boat itself increases carbon emmisions as it is made of carbon. That is the knowledge of a 2 year old.
 
It took Sir Tim Clark a long time to face up to the climate crisis.

The President of Emirates, the biggest long-haul airline in the world, was no climate change denier. But he was pretty sceptical about some of the claims.

Not now, though. "The stark reality of climate change is with us. I'm a climate change believer. I have to say, it took me a long time to get there.

"And we [in the aviation industry] aren't doing ourselves any favours by chucking billions of tons of carbon into the air. It's got to be dealt with," he told the BBC.

It's a frank admission from one of the most powerful people in an industry that has many commercial reasons to bury its head in the sand.

Another surprise is his admiration for climate change activists. "I quite like Extinction Rebellion and Greta Thunberg for having brought a real focus to the issue; a focus on the fact that we are not doing enough at the speed we should be.

"I'm not condoning some of their methods. But Extinction Rebellion and Greta have a role to play... We really need this kind of thing to force us to make decisions."

Activists have done more to highlight the issues than any government or industry body ever has, he says.

Sir Tim, 70 later this month, has spent half his working life helping to establish and then run the Dubai-based carrier. Emirates is now one of the world's most successful airlines, carrying 150,000 people a day.

So, tackling the airline's carbon footprint is not the first challenge he's faced. But it's up there with the biggest.

Emirates, which also includes a big cargo operation, burns through an astonishing 100 million barrels of oil each year. So finding a viable alternative to fossil fuels is not going to happen any time soon, Sir Tim says.

He has little faith that electric battery alternatives will ever be capable of powering a big airliner. And while biofuels are an option, they won't be scalable to meet demand.

Sir Tim thinks synthetic fuels offer the best alternative, but these are years from being fit for purpose.

Nevertheless, meaningful change is happening, Sir Tim insists. "But the industry has been a very bad articulator of the good things we've done."

Aero-engines are far more efficient - 50% more efficient than 30 years ago, he says. Use of lighter materials in manufacturing airframes means a lighter fuel burn.

Airlines are stripping out plastic use where they can - "more difficult than you'd imagine"- and changing the way aircraft taxi on runways.

It would also help if governments improved airspace use. "Aircraft don't fly in a straight line. Even in Europe we have to make too many dog-legs," he said.

There are plenty of other small changes - what he calls "low hanging fruit" - that cumulatively could make a big dent in the industry's carbon footprint. "We are trying every trick in the book to improve things," he said.

Except, emissions are forecast to rise over the next couple of years as air travel in the Middle East and Asia continues to grow. And Emirates is expanding its fleet to meet that growth. Sir Tim spoke to the BBC at the Dubai Air Show, where the airline has announced another blockbuster $16bn order for aircraft.

He understands that most activists and "flight shamers" won't be happy until aircraft stop flying. But it's not practical and, frankly, it's just not going to happen, he said. Sir Tim also wonders if people in Europe and the US should be denying newly-affluent travellers elsewhere the same benefits the West had.

While he accepts there will be no meeting of minds with those on the other side of the table, he would like activists to at least know they have helped push through change. "We not longer dragging our feet," he said.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-50481107.
 
Greta Thunberg, the Swedish schoolgirl who inspired a global movement to fight climate change, has been named Time magazine's Person of the Year for 2019.

The 16-year-old is the youngest person to be chosen by the magazine in a tradition that started in 1927.

Speaking at a UN climate change summit in Madrid before the announcement, she urged world leaders to stop using "creative PR" to avoid real action.

The next decade would define the planet's future, she said.

Last year, the teenager started an environmental strike by missing lessons most Fridays to protest outside the Swedish parliament building. It sparked a worldwide movement that became popular with the hashtag #FridaysForFuture.

Since then, she has become a strong voice for action on climate change, inspiring millions of students to join protests around the world. Earlier this year, she was nominated as a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Who is Greta Thunberg?
Island nation's 'fight to death'
What is climate change?
Where we are in seven charts
At the UN Climate Conference in New York in September, she blasted politicians for relying on young people for answers to climate change. In a now-famous speech, she said: "You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. We'll be watching you."

Reacting to the nomination on Twitter, the activist said: "Wow, this is unbelievable! I share this great honour with everyone in the #FridaysForFuture movement and climate activists everywhere."

The teenager's message, however, has not been well received by everyone, most notably prominent conservative voices. Before her appearance in Madrid, Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro called her a "brat" after she expressed concern about the killing of indigenous Brazilians in the Amazon.

"Greta said that the Indians died because they were defending the Amazon," Mr Bolsonaro told reporters. "It's impressive that the press is giving space to a brat like that," he said, using the Portuguese word for brat, "pirralha".

The activist responded by briefly changing her Twitter bio to "Pirralha".

She has previously been at odds with US President Donald Trump, who has questioned climate science and rolled back many US climate laws, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, who once called her a "kind but poorly informed teenager".

Media captionGreta at UN climate change talks - one year apart
Announcing Time's decision on NBC, editor-in-chief Edward Felsenthal said: "She became the biggest voice on the biggest issue facing the planet this year, coming from essentially nowhere to lead a worldwide movement."

The magazine's tradition, which started as Man of the Year, recognises the person who "for better or for worse... has done the most to influence the events of the year". Last year, it named murdered and imprisoned journalists, calling them "The Guardians".

What happened in Madrid?
At the COP25 Climate Conference in Madrid, Greta Thunberg accused world powers of making constant attempts to find loopholes to avoid making substantial changes.

"The real danger is when politicians and CEOs are making it look like real action is happening when, in fact, almost nothing is being done apart from clever accounting and creative PR," she said, drawing applause.

Summits on climate change seemed "to have turned into some kind of opportunity for countries to negotiate loopholes and to avoid raising their ambition", she added.

"In just three weeks we'll enter a new decade, a decade that will define our future," she said. "Right now, we're desperate for any sign of hope."

A speech grounded in research
This was meant to be a big moment in the talks, the elixir of the "Greta effect" bringing new energy to a flagging process. The teenager is almost certainly the most famous person here, attracting far more attention than other celebrities like Al Gore, and the UN badly needs a boost.

Her talk came over as measured, grounded in the latest research, and avoided the flash of hurt and anger she displayed in New York in September. Looking around the hall, it was striking how many of the national delegations had not turned up for this morning session at the conference.

A snub by the big fossil fuel economies? Or maybe they were too busy in the negotiations themselves?

In any event, the passion among the millions of young people who have taken to the streets to demand action on climate change feels very remote from the diplomatic struggles in these halls.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50740324
 
Climate change: Methane pulse detected from South Sudan wetlands

cientists think they can now explain at least part of the recent growth in methane (CH4) levels in the atmosphere.

Researchers, led from Edinburgh University, UK, say their studies point to a big jump in emissions coming from just the wetlands of South Sudan.

Satellite data indicates the region received a large surge of water from East African lakes, including Victoria.

This would have boosted CH4 from the wetlands, accounting for a significant part of the rise in global methane.

Perhaps even up to a third of the growth seen in the period 2010-2016, when considered with East Africa as a whole.

"There's not much ground-monitoring in this region that can prove or disprove our results, but the data we have fits together beautifully," said Prof Paul Palmer.

"We have independent lines of evidence to show the Sudd wetlands expanded in size, and you can even see it in aerial imagery - they became greener," he told BBC News.

Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, and - just like carbon dioxide - is increasing its concentration in the atmosphere.

It's not been a steady rise, however. Indeed, during the early 2000s, the amount of the gas even stabilised for a while. But then the concentration jumped in about 2007, with a further uptick recorded in 2014.

CH4 (methane) is now climbing rapidly and today stands at just over 1,860 parts per billion by volume.

There's currently a debate about the likely sources, with emissions from human activities such as agriculture and fossil-fuel use undoubtedly in the mix. But there is a large natural component as well, and a lot of current research is centred on contributions from the tropics.

The Edinburgh group has been using the Japanese GOSAT spacecraft to try to observe the greenhouse-gas behaviour over peatlands and wetlands in Africa, and found significant rises in methane emissions above South Sudan centred on the years 2011-2014.

Believing the region called the Sudd could be the culprit (soil microbes in wetlands are known to produce a lot of methane), the team started looking through other satellite data-sets to make the link.

Land surface temperature observations supported the idea that soils in the region had become wetter; gravity measurements across East Africa also detected an increase in the weight of water held in the ground; and satellite altimeters had tracked changes in the height of lakes and rivers to the south.

"The levels of the East African lakes, which feed down the Nile to the Sudd, increased considerably over the period we were studying. It coincided with the increase in methane that we saw, and would imply that we were getting this increased flow down the river into the wetlands," explained Dr Mark Lunt.

Much of the extra water likely resulted as a consequence of dam releases upstream.

The Edinburgh group published its findings on Wednesday in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, and, as an update to the story, Dr Lunt is presenting new data here at the American Geophysical Union meeting.

He's been looking at methane observations made by the EU's Sentinel-5P satellite. Its Tropomi instrument sees CH4 at a finer resolution than GOSAT, and it's clear from the European mapper that methane emissions are still elevated over South Sudan.

The level of activity is nothing like the same as in the early 2010s, but the Sudd wetlands remain an important source.

"It's a huge area so it's not surprising that it's pumping out a lot of methane. To give context - the Sudd is 40,000 sq km: two times the size of Wales. And being that big we expect to see the emissions from space," Dr Lunt told BBC News.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-50708544
 
Climate activist Greta Thunberg has changed her Twitter bio to mock US President Donald Trump's outrage at her winning Time Person of the Year 2019.

He said she had an "anger management problem" and should go to "a good old fashioned movie with a friend".

"Chill Greta, Chill!" he added.

She then adapted her Twitter bio to say she was "a teenager working on her anger management problem. Currently chilling and watching a good old fashioned movie with a friend".

The Swedish 16-year-old was named as Time magazine's Person of the Year on Wednesday after leading a global movement against climate change.

This is not the first time she has changed her Twitter bio to reflect Mr Trump and other leaders' criticism of her.

On Tuesday Ms Thunberg changed her bio to "pirralha" - the Portuguese word for brat - after Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro criticised her highlighting the plight of Brazil's indigenous people.

"Greta's been saying Indians have died because they were defending the Amazon," Mr Bolsonaro told reporters. "It's amazing how much space the press gives this kind of pirralha."

In October she changed the bio to "a kind but poorly informed teenager". This was exactly how Russian President Vladimir Putin had described her at a conference in Moscow.

In September President Trump posted a video of her speaking emotionally at the UN conference and sarcastically commented: "She seems like a very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future."

She changed her bio accordingly: "A very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future".

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50762373
 
The Greta cult have nothing better to do than to mock because the joke is on her and her disciples.

Natural methane in Africa and CO2 from the volcano eruption in NZ, have all but poured water over the climate activists this year. All that hard work this year, oops I mean propaganda, undermined by 2 natural occurrences of climate change.

Love it! :)))
 
Greta without a script

Well, seems the leader of the climate activist cult is truly a puppet. Unable to answer a question on her message, and totally blanked the question on Trump's tweet. This is what happens without a script.

[Utube]bGW5jW_WpVg[/utube]
 
Greta Thunberg has apologised for saying world leaders should be "put against the wall" in a speech.

The teenage climate activist made the comment while addressing a Fridays For Future protest in Turin, Italy.

In English the phrase is associated with execution by firing squad, but Ms Thunberg said it had a different meaning in her native language Swedish.

"That's what happens when you improvise speeches in a second language," she added on Saturday.

Ms Thunberg was speaking in Turin after attending the UN climate summit COP25 in the Spanish capital Madrid.

She said she feared the summit alone would not lead to adequate climate action, and that activists should continue to take world leaders to task.

"World leaders are still trying to run away from their responsibilities, but we have to make sure they cannot do that," she said.

"We will make sure that we put them against the wall, and they will have to do their job to protect our futures."

After some initial concern over her use of the phrase - which usually means to execute people by firing squad, against a wall - she tweeted a clarification.

"Yesterday I said we must hold our leaders accountable and unfortunately said 'put them against the wall'," she wrote.

"That's Swenglish: 'att ställa någon mot väggen' (to put someone against the wall) means to hold someone accountable."

She continued: "Of course I apologise if anyone misunderstood this. I cannot enough express the fact that I - as well as the entire school strike movement - are against any possible form of violence. It goes without saying but I say it anyway."

Ms Thunberg was recently named Time magazine's youngest ever Person of the Year, for inspiring a global movement to fight the climate crisis.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50799233
 
Teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg has said it was “extremely likely” that she fell ill with coronavirus but has now recovered.

The 17-year-old said she felt “tired, had shivers, a sore throat and coughed” after returning from a trip in Europe, so self-isolated for two weeks.

“Everyone feeling ill are told to stay at home and isolate themselves. I have therefore not been tested for Covid-19, but it’s extremely likely that I’ve had it, given the combined symptoms and circumstances," she wrote on Instagram.

She warned people to stay at home because “our actions can be the difference between life and death” for others.
 
Well, seems the leader of the climate activist cult is truly a puppet. Unable to answer a question on her message, and totally blanked the question on Trump's tweet. This is what happens without a script.

[Utube]bGW5jW_WpVg[/utube]

That was hilarious. Greta sure does look like a noob without someone handing her over the script.
 
I m curious who is creating these Malalas and Gretas of the world? Is this some new conspiracy?
 
I m curious who is creating these Malalas and Gretas of the world? Is this some new conspiracy?

Far Left Liberals.

Why combine Malala with Greta?

Malala at least has a case against her culture where women are not treated as equals.

Greta is a total noob. Malala can at least speak well and talks with some brains.
 
Far Left Liberals.

Why combine Malala with Greta?

Malala at least has a case against her culture where women are not treated as equals.

Greta is a total noob. Malala can at least speak well and talks with some brains.
OH please... you cannot pick or choose the righteous ones based on your preferences...


The way I see it they are both the same sort of drama. Just because she can speak well does not make her any different in terms of what they are preaching. Women are not treated a equals anywhere in the world. She used her situation to get her and her family to UK and gain fame. You think she was the only girl in that bus? You think her class mates actually stopped going to school or are not going to school since her accident? They all are.. and they hate her because they see the real her.

I think this Greta is also being "used" by certain groups just like Malala was/is. She is ambitious and means well but she is a tool to extend a certain agenda.


dISCLAIMER: I do not in any way, condone the damage we are causing on this planet. I merely question the ulterior motives of those who are weirdly heavily publicizing certain persons.
 
OH please... you cannot pick or choose the righteous ones based on your preferences...


The way I see it they are both the same sort of drama. Just because she can speak well does not make her any different in terms of what they are preaching. Women are not treated a equals anywhere in the world. She used her situation to get her and her family to UK and gain fame. You think she was the only girl in that bus? You think her class mates actually stopped going to school or are not going to school since her accident? They all are.. and they hate her because they see the real her.

I think this Greta is also being "used" by certain groups just like Malala was/is. She is ambitious and means well but she is a tool to extend a certain agenda.


dISCLAIMER: I do not in any way, condone the damage we are causing on this planet. I merely question the ulterior motives of those who are weirdly heavily publicizing certain persons.

Malala got shot in her face by Terrorists. She had a legit reason to move to West. I am not picking or choosing here. Malala would probably be dead if she were still in Pakistan and speaking her mind.
 
Malala got shot in her face by Terrorists. She had a legit reason to move to West. I am not picking or choosing here. Malala would probably be dead if she were still in Pakistan and speaking her mind.

A lot of women are speaking their minds.. are they all getting shot? Did you see the aurat March stuff?

Come on, man.. that’s exactly what they want you to believe and use certain people to extend their propaganda and agenda. Yes, it’s bad but doesn’t mean people with guns are waiting to shoot down any female who wants to go school.. remember thousands of girls in that area go to school and they still are..

Thats like saying the next rape victim in India who stands up and speaks against rape will get killed or raped again. It’s ridiculous. When you have such high profile publicity attached to you, you are almost untouchable. Hurting you will make the other party even a worse culprit..
 
Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg has donated a $100,000 (£80,000) prize she won from a Danish foundation to the United Nations Children’s Fund (Unicef) for use against the pandemic.

“Like the climate crisis, the coronavirus pandemic is a child rights' crisis,” said Thunberg

“It will affect all children, now and in the long term, but vulnerable groups will be impacted the most. I’m asking everyone to step up and join me in support of Unicef's vital work to save children’s lives, to protect health and continue education.”

Danish anti-poverty organisation Human Act, which awarded Thunberg the original prize, has matched her donation.
 
A lot of women are speaking their minds.. are they all getting shot? Did you see the aurat March stuff?

Come on, man.. that’s exactly what they want you to believe and use certain people to extend their propaganda and agenda. Yes, it’s bad but doesn’t mean people with guns are waiting to shoot down any female who wants to go school.. remember thousands of girls in that area go to school and they still are..

Thats like saying the next rape victim in India who stands up and speaks against rape will get killed or raped again. It’s ridiculous. When you have such high profile publicity attached to you, you are almost untouchable. Hurting you will make the other party even a worse culprit..

Not sure what point you are making here. I think you just don’t like to see young girls speaking out and taking a moral lead.
 
Far Left Liberals.

A contradiction in terms. Far left is communism. Modern Liberals are not communists, they are for personal freedom and for free marketeers, who expect the markets to serve people and planet as well as profit.

Nobody “creates” Malala and Greta, except themselves.
 
Last edited:
Not sure what point you are making here. I think you just don’t like to see young girls speaking out and taking a moral lead.

Judgmental much?
You need to read the entire thread to catch my drift...

The world media is the latest modern day WMD. It is a reality bending, mind wiping, propaganda badassery that is now being mastered by many countries. I think it started with US during the first gulf war and now the Russians, the indians, the Pakistanis, the right, the left, all are using it with devastating results. You just have to find the right ingredients. Malala and Greta are just two examples. I am not questioning their sincerity or motives. At least definitely not at all in Greta’s case.
 
Judgmental much?
You need to read the entire thread to catch my drift...

The world media is the latest modern day WMD. It is a reality bending, mind wiping, propaganda badassery that is now being mastered by many countries. I think it started with US during the first gulf war and now the Russians, the indians, the Pakistanis, the right, the left, all are using it with devastating results. You just have to find the right ingredients. Malala and Greta are just two examples. I am not questioning their sincerity or motives. At least definitely not at all in Greta’s case.

Still not clear of your point. Do you mean that activism is futile because it inevitable gets absorbed by the big biz / government narrative and repurposed?
 
We all know Greta is well funded by Green Capitalist around the world. I have been for last 10 years been saying how hypocrites these green capitalists are. They dont care about planet, they just care about their money. Environmentalists are absolutely clueless about Renewable "GREEN" energy.

Finally someone like Michael Moore highlighted to the world how dangerous this group is and they're infact destroying the world further. The name of the documentary is Planet of the Humans

Link:
https://youtu.be/Zk11vI-7czE
 
Still not clear of your point. Do you mean that activism is futile because it inevitable gets absorbed by the big biz / government narrative and repurposed?

If it’s not the right, it’s the left.. and if not left, the right.

It’s not governments controlling or trying to control the narrative or policies anymore. It’s big Corp and certain overzealous factions who want to hold the power.. this is all means to an end.. Malala and Greta are genuine kids. But they are being used by certain people as poster children to extreme their views.. it’s not like Malala is the only one in Pakistan who was not allowed to go to school.. but at the same it’s not as if there aren’t millions of girls who actually do go to school in Pakistan.. I don’t know if you can read between the lines here.

Same way Greta can’t be the only child who feels strongly about climate change.. but she is the one who was hand picked by certain people to extend their own agenda... now they are both puppets!
 
The environmental campaigner, Greta Thunberg, has challenged “the myth” that children are not affected by the virus and can’t spread it.

Speaking to CNN, the 17-year-old activist urged children to stick to physical distancing rules.

She said:

It’s sort of a myth right now that children are not being being affected by this virus. And that is very wrong. Children both do get this disease and they also spread it on to others so. So we need to be very careful that this misinformation, that it doesn’t affect children, becomes mainstream. We need to make sure that people understand that this affects children.

Thunberg went into isolation in March after displaying mild symptoms of coronavirus. She said:

Many people don’t even notice that they have symptoms and then they might spread the virus without even knowing it. We young people have a very big responsibility because we we might not experience the symptoms as as bad as many others. So we have to be extra careful, because our actions can be the difference between life and death for many others.

She also expressed hope that the crisis would mean that politicians and the public now follows the warnings of scientists. She said:

More people are starting to realise that we are actually depending on science, and that we need to listen to scientists and experts. I really hope that stays for other crises, such as the climate crisis and the environmental crisis, that we understand that we have to listen to the scientists.
 
Greta Thunberg says the world needs to learn the lessons of coronavirus and treat climate change with similar urgency.

That means the world acting "with necessary force", the Swedish climate activist says in an exclusive interview with BBC News.

She doesn't think any "green recovery plan" will solve the crisis alone.

And she says the world is now passing a "social tipping point" on climate and issues such as Black Lives Matter.

"People are starting to realise that we cannot keep looking away from these things", says Ms Thunberg, "we cannot keep sweeping these injustices under the carpet".

She says lockdown has given her time to relax and reflect away from the public gaze.

Ms Thunberg has shared with the BBC the text of a deeply personal programme she has made for Swedish Radio.

In the radio programme, which goes online this morning, Greta looks back on the year in which she became one of the world's most high-profile celebrities.

The then 16-year-old took a sabbatical from school to spend a tumultuous year campaigning on the climate.

She sailed across the Atlantic on a racing yacht to address a special UN Climate Action summit in New York in September.

She describes world leaders queuing to get pictures with her, with Angela Merkel asking whether it was okay to post her photo on social media.

The climate campaigner is sceptical of their motives. "Perhaps it makes them forget the shame of their generation letting all future generations down", she says. "I guess maybe it helps them to sleep at night."

It was in the UN that she delivered her famous "how dare you" speech. "You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words", she told the world leaders gathered in the UN Assembly.

She appeared on the verge of tears as she continued. "People are dying," she said, "and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you?"

She knew it was a "lifetime moment" and decided not to hold anything back, she says now.

"I am going to let my emotions take control and to really make something big out of this because I won't be able to do this again".

She describes travelling back from the UN to her hotel on the subway and seeing people watching the speech on their phones, but says she felt no urge to celebrate.

"All that is left are empty words", she says.

The phrase reflects her deep cynicism about the motives of most world leaders.

"The level of knowledge and understanding even among people in power is very, very low, much lower than you would think," she told the BBC.

She says the only way to reduce emissions on the scale that is necessary is to make fundamental changes to our lifestyles, starting in developing countries. But she doesn't believe any leaders have the nerve to do that.

Instead, she says, they "simply refrain from reporting the emissions, or move them somewhere else".

She claims the UK, Sweden and other countries do this by failing to account for the emissions from ships and aircraft and by choosing not to count the emissions from goods produced in factories abroad.

As a result, she says in her radio programme, the whole language of debate has been degraded.

"Words like green, sustainable, 'net-zero', 'environmentally friendly', 'organic', 'climate-neutral' and 'fossil-free' are today so misused and watered down that they have pretty much lost all their meaning. They can imply everything from deforestation to aviation, meat and car industries," she said.

Ms Thunberg says the only positive that could come out of the coronavirus pandemic would be if it changes how we deal with global crises: "It shows that in a crisis, you act, and you act with necessary force."

She says she is encouraged that politicians are now stressing the importance of listening to scientists and experts.

"Suddenly people in power are saying they will do whatever it takes since you cannot put a price on human life."

She hopes that will open up a discussion about the urgency of taking action to help the people who die from illnesses related to climate change and environmental degradation right now as well as in the future.

But she remains deeply pessimistic about our ability to keep any temperature increases within safe boundaries.

She says that, even if countries actually deliver the carbon reductions they've promised, we'll still be heading for a "catastrophic" global temperature rise of 3-4 degrees.

The teenager believes the only way to avoid a climate crisis is to tear up contracts and abandon existing deals and agreements that companies and countries have signed up to.

"The climate and ecological crisis cannot be solved within today's political and economic systems", the Swedish climate activist argues. "That isn't an opinion. That's a fact."

Thunberg talks movingly of a road-trip she and her father took through North America in an electric car borrowed from Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Hollywood actor turned politician and climate campaigner.

She visited the charred remains of Paradise, the Californian town destroyed by a wildfire in November 2018.

She is shocked by the carbon-intensive lifestyles she saw in the US. "Apart from a few wind power plants and solar panels," she says, "there are no signs whatsoever of any sustainable transition, despite this being the richest country in the world."

But the social inequities struck her just as forcefully.

She describes meeting poor black, Hispanic and indigenous communities.

"It was very shocking to hear people talk about that they can't afford to put food on the table", she explained.

Yet Greta Thunberg says she has been inspired by the way people have been responding to these injustices, particularly the Black Lives Matter protests following the death of George Floyd in May.

She believes society has "passed a social tipping point, we can no longer look away from what our society has been ignoring for so long whether it is equality, justice or sustainability".

She describes signs of what she calls an "awakening" in which "people are starting to find their voice, to sort of understand that they can actually have an impact".

That is why Greta Thunberg says she still has hope.

"Humanity has not yet failed", she argues.

She concludes her radio documentary in powerful form.

"Nature does not bargain and you cannot compromise with the laws of physics," the teenager asserts.

"Doing our best is no longer good enough. We must now do the seemingly impossible. And that is up to you and me. Because no one else will do it for us."

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-53100800
 
Greta Thunberg demands 'crisis' response to climate change

LONDON (Reuters) - Swedish activist Greta Thunberg urged European leaders on Thursday to take emergency action on climate change, saying people in power had practically “given up” on the possibility of handing over a decent future to coming generations.

In an interview with Reuters television, the 17-year-old said governments would only be able to mount a meaningful response once they accepted they needed to transform the whole economic system.

“We need to see it as, above all, an existential crisis. And as long as it’s not being treated as a crisis, we can have as many of these climate change negotiations and talks, conferences as possible. It won’t change a thing,” Thunberg said, speaking via video from her home in Stockholm.

“Above all, we are demanding that we need to treat this crisis as a crisis, because if we don’t do that, then we won’t be able to do anything,” Thunberg said.

Thunberg joined several thousand people, including climate scientists, economists, actors and activists in signing an open letter climateemergencyeu.org urging European leaders to start treating climate change like an “emergency.”

The letter was made public on Thursday, a day before a European Council summit where countries in the 27-member EU will try to reach a deal on the bloc’s next budget and a recovery package to respond to the economic shock of the coronavirus pandemic.

Demands in the letter included an immediate halt to all investments in fossil fuel exploration and extraction, in parallel with a rapid ending of fossil fuel subsidies.

It also called for binding annual “carbon budgets” to limit how much greenhouse gas countries can emit to maximise the chances of capping the rise in average global temperatures at 1.5C, a goal enshrined in the 2015 Paris climate accord.

“We understand and know very well that the world is complicated and that what we are asking for may not be easy. The changes necessary to safeguard humanity may seem very unrealistic,” the letter said.

“But it is much more unrealistic to believe that our society would be able to survive the global heating we’re heading for, as well as other disastrous ecological consequences of today’s business as usual.”

The letter called for climate policies to be designed to protect workers and the most vulnerable and reduce economic, racial and gender inequalities, as well as moves to “safeguard and protect” democracy.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-c...response-to-climate-change-idUKKCN24H1KO?il=0
 
Greta Thunberg has turned down the chance to become a millionaire and will instead donate a €1m prize to environmental causes
 
Climate activist Greta Thunberg back to school in Sweden

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Climate activist Greta Thunberg is back in school after a gap year in which she emerged as the voice of young people trying to save the planet from global warming and a thorn in the side of politicians she sees as dragging their heels over change.

Posting a picture of herself with a backpack and pushing a bicycle, the Swedish 17-year-old tweeted: “My gap year from school is over, and it feels so great to finally be back in school again!”

Thunberg, who sparked a global youth-led protest movement after striking outside the Swedish parliament in 2018, has spent the last year berating politicians about rising global temperatures and what she sees as their failure to live up to agreements enshrined in the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement.

Time Magazine’s Person of the Year in 2019, Thunberg has spoken at the World Economic Forum in Davos and the COP25 climate summit in Madrid over the last 12 months, calling for urgent action to prevent a climate disaster.

In a Reuters interview in July, Thunberg said people in power had practically given up on handing over a decent future to coming generations.

With Europe beginning to emerge from coronavirus lockdowns, there have been calls for the EU’s recovery fund to be used to promote a transition to a “green” economy.

Meeting German Chancellor Angela Merkel last week, Thunberg called on her to step out of her “comfort zone” and speed up action to fight the climate emergency.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...unberg-back-to-school-in-sweden-idUSKBN25L13L
 
How the oil industry made us doubt climate change

As climate change becomes a focus of the US election, energy companies stand accused of trying to downplay their contribution to global warming. In June, Minnesota's Attorney General sued ExxonMobil, among others, for launching a "campaign of deception" which deliberately tried to undermine the science supporting global warming. So what's behind these claims? And what links them to how the tobacco industry tried to dismiss the harms of smoking decades earlier?
To understand what's happening today, we need to go back nearly 40 years.
Marty Hoffert leaned closer to his computer screen. He couldn't quite believe what he was seeing. It was 1981, and he was working in an area of science considered niche.
"We were just a group of geeks with some great computers," he says now, recalling that moment.
But his findings were alarming.
"I created a model that showed the Earth would be warming very significantly. And the warming would introduce climatic changes that would be unprecedented in human history. That blew my mind."

Marty Hoffert was one of the first scientists to create a model which predicted the effects of man-made climate change. And he did so while working for Exxon, one of the world's largest oil companies, which would later merge with another, Mobil.
At the time Exxon was spending millions of dollars on ground-breaking research. It wanted to lead the charge as scientists grappled with the emerging understanding that the warming planet could cause the climate to change in ways that could make life pretty difficult for humans.
Hoffert shared his predictions with his managers, showing them what might happen if we continued burning fossil fuels in our cars, trucks and planes.

But he noticed a clash between Exxon's own findings, and public statements made by company bosses, such as the then chief executive Lee Raymond, who said that "currently, the scientific evidence is inconclusive as to whether human activities are having a significant effect on the global climate".
"They were saying things that were contradicting their own world-class research groups," said Hoffert.
Angry, he left Exxon, and went on to become a leading academic in the field.
"What they did was immoral. They spread doubt about the dangers of climate change when their own researchers were confirming how serious a threat it was."
So what changed? The record-breaking hot summer of 1988 was key. Big news in America, it gave extra weight to warnings from Nasa scientist Dr Jim Hansen that "the greenhouse effect has been detected, and is changing our climate now".
Political leaders took notice. Then UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher acknowledged the great new global threat: "The environmental challenge which confronts the whole world demands an equivalent response from the whole world."
In 1989, Exxon's strategy chief Duane Levine drew up a confidential presentation for the company's board, one of thousands of documents in the company's archive which were later donated to The University of Texas at Austin.
Levine's presentation is an important document, often cited by researchers investigating Exxon's record on climate change science.
"We're starting to hear the inevitable call for action," it said, which risked what it called "irreversible and costly draconian steps".
"More rational responses will require efforts to extend the science and increase emphasis on costs and political realities."

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-53640382.
 
Climate Week: World split on urgency of tackling rising temperatures, global poll shows

There's growing concern among citizens all over the world about climate change, according to a new global poll.

But respondents had very different attitudes to the level of urgency required to tackle the problem.

Big majorities in poorer countries strongly agreed with tackling climate change with the same vigour as Covid-19.

However in richer nations, the support for rapid action was far more muted.

The poll, carried out by Globescan, provides fresh evidence that people the world over remain very concerned about climate change, despite the pandemic and subsequent economic impact.

Across the 27 countries surveyed, around 90% of people saw climate change as a very serious or somewhat serious problem.

This finding has strengthened over the past few years.

There have been big increases in this sense of urgency among people polled in Canada, France, India, Kenya, Nigeria and the US.

In the US this number of people perceiving the issue as serious or very serious has increased from just over 60% in 2014, to 81% in June this year when the poll was carried out - that's despite President Trump's well known scepticism on the issue.

In the same time period, serious concerns over climate change in India have risen from 70% to 93% of those polled.

According to Eric Whan, from pollsters Globescan, the covid crisis has increased people's sense of the threat from rising temperatures.

"This is a year of vulnerability and exacerbation of inequality and those most susceptible to disruption feel the greatest level of seriousness," he told BBC News.

But when people were asked if their governments should tackle the issue with the same urgency as they've tackled the coronavirus pandemic, major differences between rich and poor started to appear.

Japan, Sweden, Australia, the US and UK all have less than 45% of respondents strongly agreeing with urgent action.

In Kenya, Mexico, Argentina, Turkey and Nigeria the figure was well above 70% in all of them.

Similarly, when asked who would suffer the most, more than 60% of respondents in Brazil, Kenya, Turkey, Nigeria and South Africa strongly agreed it would be poor people.

But in Japan, Australia, US, UK and others, less than 40% strongly felt it would be the poor who would bear the brunt.

Perhaps one key to these discrepancies might be down to personal experience of climate change.

In the UK, just 13% of respondents said they were personally affected by rising temperatures, compared to 34% who said they were personally affected by the coronavirus pandemic.

There were similar differences in richer countries like Sweden, the US and Japan.

But in Mexico, Turkey and Vietnam more than 50% of those polled said they had personal experience of climate change.

"I think back to Hurricane Katrina, which was a watershed moment in more than two decades of tracking public opinion on climate change," said Eric Whan.

"There was a real shock to the system and the poll numbers changed quite a bit, as people more and more came to realise that this is a serious problem, that it's anthropogenic, and that we are actually vulnerable and not particularly protected."

The poll was carried out online among samples of 1,000 adults in each of the 27 countries.

It's been released to mark the start of Climate Week 2020 in New York, which is expected to be the biggest climate summit taking place this year and is being run in co-ordination with the UN.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-54208995.
 
Climate Week: Prince Charles calls for 'swift' action on climate change

The Prince of Wales has warned the climate crisis will "dwarf" the impact of coronavirus.

In a recorded message, to be played at the virtual opening of Climate Week on Monday, Prince Charles said "swift and immediate action" was needed.

The prince said Covid-19 provided a "window of opportunity" to reset the economy for a more "sustainable and inclusive future".

He added that the pandemic was "a wake-up call we cannot ignore".

In his message, recorded from Birkhall in the grounds of Balmoral, Prince Charles said: "Without swift and immediate action, at an unprecedented pace and scale, we will miss the window of opportunity to 'reset' for... a more sustainable and inclusive future."

"[The environmental] crisis has been with us for far too many years - decried, denigrated and denied," he said.

"It is now rapidly becoming a comprehensive catastrophe that will dwarf the impact of the coronavirus pandemic."

Charles, 71, tested positive for coronavirus in March after displaying mild symptoms.

He has been championing environmental causes for decades and has previously called for members of the Commonwealth to work together to tackle climate change.

In January, he urged business and political leaders to embrace a sustainable future at the Davos summit, where he also met teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg.

The global lockdown led to a dramatic drop in greenhouse gases and air pollutants but a study last month suggested this would have a "negligible" impact on rising temperatures.

The analysis suggested that by 2030, global temperatures would only be 0.01C lower than expected.

But the researchers, led by the University of Leeds, stressed that a green recovery could significantly alter the long term outlook and keep the world from exceeding 1.5C of warming by the middle of this century.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-54229229.
 
Greta Thunberg: ‘Only people like me dare ask tough questions on climate’

The activist discusses a new film that follows her life and the role autism played in her journey from troubled child to eco champion

For a teenager who first became famous for skipping school, Greta Thunberg has come a long way. The 17-year-old from Stockholm is today a global champion of the environment movement and the uncompromising scourge of climate crisis deniers. In the process, she has earned the disdain of Donald Trump and the plaudits of figures including the pope and David Attenborough. For good measure, Time made her the magazine’s Person of the Year for 2019.

It is an astonishing journey that will be brought to our screens this week with the release of I am Greta, a 97-minute documentary that follows the activist, who has autism, on trips round the world as she raises the banners of green concern among young campaigners.

At the United Nations, we see her warning its secretary general, António Guterres, that “political leaders have failed us – but now change is coming”. At the Vatican, we see her greeted by a huge crowd chanting “Go Greta, save the planet!” and, later, flotillas of boats sailing out to meet her when the zero-carbon yacht that had carried her across the Atlantic to attend a UN climate meeting arrives in New York.

As I am Greta makes clear, the world has reacted in a remarkable way to this slight, determined figure. Even more astonishing is the nature of the figure at the centre of these events, for Thunberg is adamant that her condition – she freely acknowledges she is autistic – has played a critical role in helping her get her message across in a clear and simple manner.

“To get out of this climate crisis, we need a different mindset from the one that got us into it,” she said in an interview with the Observer last week. “People like me – who have Asperger’s syndrome and autism, who don’t follow social codes – we are not stuck in this social game of avoiding important issues.

“We dare to ask difficult questions. It helps us see through the static while everyone else seems to be content to role-play.”

Thunberg believes her condition helps her look at the world and see what others cannot, or will not, see. She dislikes small talk and socialising, preferring to stick to routines and stay “laser-focused”.

And her ability to concentrate fiercely is acknowledged by her father, Svante Thunberg. “She can read a book and remember everything in it,” he says ruefully.

But while she argues that her disorder has given her a unique vision of the looming crisis being unleashed by rising carbon dioxide emissions, we see that it has also brought her considerable unhappiness.

Her early childhood was marked by several painful episodes, and at the age of 11 she simply withdrew from life. “She stopped laughing,” says her mother, Malena Ernman. “She stopped talking. And she stopped eating.” As Thunberg puts it: “I almost starved to death.”

The youngster stayed away from school for a year. “She only spoke to me, her mother and her little sister,” says her father in the documentary.

Thunberg is equally forthcoming in the film about the unhappiness she experienced. “For many years, people – especially children – were very mean to me. I was never invited to parties or celebrations. I was always left out. I spent most of my time socialising with my family – and my dogs.” (The latter, black labrador Roxy and golden retriever Moses, play major roles in her life, as the film makes clear.)

Thunberg managed to pull back from the brink, however, and for most of the documentary we see a fairly happy individual: cooking with her mother and laughing with her father. Nevertheless, hers is an unusual background for a person who has become a global star.

The process began with her school strike – against Swedish politicians’ failures to take meaningful action on the climate crisis. “Why have an education when there is no future,” she demanded. The strike was a social media sensation and almost overnight Thunberg became a star of the green movement. She has since spoken to the UN nations in New York, appeared at the COP24 climate conference in Katowice, in Poland and visited the European Parliament.

At the EU she broke down in tears during a speech in which she outlined the extent of the extinctions, triggered by climate change, that were occurring across the planet. And at the 2019 UN climate summit in New York, an infuriated Thunberg told delegates: “People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money and fairytales about eternal economic growth. How dare you!” Intriguingly, Thunberg insists her performance at the general assembly was an unusual one for her. “I’m never angry. I’m not even angry at home. That was the only time I’ve been angry. Before that speech, I thought, this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. I need to make sure something comes out of it. So I let my emotions take over.”

Her words are pretty uncompromising in general, however, and her speeches have earned her the approbation of fans who range from Arnie Schwarzenegger to Jon Bercow to Emmanuel Macron and alsoattracted the scorn of Brazil’s populist president Jair Bolsonaro, Russia’s Vladimir Putin, and others.

Thunberg has also received death threats, we learn. So are they still being sent, I ask her? Thunberg looks unfazed. “I don’t know. I don’t spend that much time checking.”

She is equally unperturbed by the political derision she has provoked. “When these people attack individuals – in some cases, children like me – that shows that they really have nowhere left to go,” she tells me.

“They have no arguments left. This is a crisis completely based on scientific consensus, but they try to focus on something else. It’s as if there was a fire and the alarm starts and they try to argue about the fire alarm instead of the actual fire.”

The pattern needs to be disrupted, she insists. “We are stuck in a loop where everyone just blames each other, and as long as we keep on doing that we won’t be able to achieve anything.”

The extent of humanity’s vulnerability is starkly demonstrated by the impact of Covid-19, adds Thunberg. “If one virus can completely destroy economies, then that is a sign that we need to rethink things and start to live sustainably.” If nothing else, Covid emphasises again that we need to listen to the science, she insists.Thunberg is now studying for her school exams and is planning a career in the social sciences. “All this attention isn’t going to last for very long,” she believes. “The interest in me will soon fade away. And, really, it’s not healthy at such a young age. So I need to see past it – although all the travelling was good fun.”

As to the documentary, Thunberg says she is happy with it, although the title makes her uncomfortable as it suggests she takes herself very seriously. “And I don’t,” she insists.

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...eople-like-me-ask-difficult-climate-questions
 
Climate activist Greta Thunberg has changed her Twitter bio to mock US President Donald Trump’s outrage at her winning Time Person of the Year 2019.

He said she had an “anger management problem” and should go to “a good old fashioned movie with a friend”.

“Chill Greta, Chill!” he added.

She then adapted her Twitter bio to say she was “a teenager working on her anger management problem. Currently chilling and watching a good old fashioned movie with a friend”.

The Swedish 16-year-old was named as Time magazine’s Person of the Year on Wednesday after leading a global movement against climate change.

This is not the first time she has changed her Twitter bio to reflect Mr Trump and other leaders’ criticism of her.

On Tuesday Ms Thunberg changed her bio to “pirralha” - the Portuguese word for brat - after Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro criticised her highlighting the plight of Brazil’s indigenous people.

“Greta’s been saying Indians have died because they were defending the Amazon,” Mr Bolsonaro told reporters. “It’s amazing how much space the press gives this kind of pirralha.”

In October she changed the bio to “a kind but poorly informed teenager”. This was exactly how Russian President Vladimir Putin had described her at a conference in Moscow.

In September President Trump posted a video of her speaking emotionally at the UN conference and sarcastically commented: “She seems like a very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future.”

She changed her bio accordingly: “A very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future”.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50762373

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So ridiculous. Donald must work on his Anger Management problem, then go to a good old fashioned movie with a friend! Chill Donald, Chill! <a href="https://t.co/4RNVBqRYBA">https://t.co/4RNVBqRYBA</a></p>— Greta Thunberg (@GretaThunberg) <a href="https://twitter.com/GretaThunberg/status/1324439705522524162?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 5, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

:ua
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So ridiculous. Donald must work on his Anger Management problem, then go to a good old fashioned movie with a friend! Chill Donald, Chill! <a href="https://t.co/4RNVBqRYBA">https://t.co/4RNVBqRYBA</a></p>— Greta Thunberg (@GretaThunberg) <a href="https://twitter.com/GretaThunberg/status/1324439705522524162?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 5, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Nicely done.
 
Boom.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">He seems like a very happy old man looking forward to a bright and wonderful future. So nice to see! <a href="https://t.co/G8gObLhsz9">pic.twitter.com/G8gObLhsz9</a></p>— Greta Thunberg (@GretaThunberg) <a href="https://twitter.com/GretaThunberg/status/1351890941087522820?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 20, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Greta Thunberg statue at Winchester university sparks anger

A £24,000 statue of Greta Thunberg installed at a university has sparked anger among students who have branded it a "vanity project".

The University of Winchester believes it is the world's first life-sized sculpture of the "inspirational" Swedish environmental activist.

But the students' union said the funds could have been better spent.

The university said "no money was diverted" from student support or staffing for the project.

Winchester UCU president Megan Ball described Thunberg as a "fantastic role model to everyone, as someone who speaks loudly and proudly about important global issues" but said the union could not support the sculpture.

She said: "We're in a Covid year, lots of students haven't really had access to campus, lots of them are trying to study online and are in dire need of support.

"We are calling on the university to match the statue cost by committing £23,760 in additional funding to student support services across campus.

"We urge them to publicly face the critical issues which students are highlighting and provide a transparent breakdown of additional and existing financial support."

The union also passed a motion describing the statue as a "vanity project".

It was commissioned in 2019 and funded through money allocated to the construction of the £50m West Downs Centre development, where the piece was unveiled earlier.

The university's vice-chancellor, Professor Joy Carter, said: "No money was diverted from student support or from staffing to finance the West Downs project. Indeed, the university has spent £5.2m this year on student support."

In an email to students about the piece, the university added it hoped the statue would become a symbol of its "commitment to combat the climate and ecological emergency."

"Greta is a young woman who, in spite of difficulties in her life, has become a world-leading environmental activist. As the university for sustainability and social justice, we are proud to honour this inspirational woman in this way," Professor Carter added.

"We know that many find her a controversial figure. As a university we welcome debate and critical conversations.

"We hope that her statue will help to inspire our community, reminding us that no matter what life throws at us we can still change the world for the better. That is a message we want all our students and all young people to hear."

It said it wanted to have the statue installed ahead of the UK hosting the UN's climate change conference, COP26.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-hampshire-56565683.
 
COP26: Greta Thunberg says Glasgow summit should be postponed

Greta Thunberg has told the BBC she does not plan to attend the UN climate conference due to be held in Glasgow this November.

The 18-year-old Swedish climate campaigner is concerned about the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on attendance at COP26.

She believes the summit should be postponed.

She says the UK government, which is hosting the summit, should wait until global vaccination rates have risen.

The summit will bring together world leaders with the aim of agreeing a plan to tackle climate change.

Ms Thunberg's decision is likely to be a significant blow for the UK government.

The activist has attended every major climate conference since her first protest outside the Swedish parliament two and a half years ago.

She said: "This needs to happen in the right way. Of course, the the best thing to do would be to get everyone vaccinated as soon as possible so that everyone could take part on the same terms."

The UN meeting has already been delayed once, from November 2020, and there have been rumours that it may be postponed again.

The last two Conference of the Parties (COP) summits have had more than 20,000 attendees and the UK is understood to have been working on the basis that as many as 30,000 people could attend in Glasgow.

At the end of last month, sources in Downing Street and Holyrood were adamant that no decision had been made on a further delay to the conference.

However, the BBC was told a final decision on whether to delay or move ahead with the summit was likely to be taken shortly after Easter.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-56686163.
 
Back
Top