How not working gives more benefits than working ?How much doesUK pay as unemployed insurance ?
I don't have the exact numbers but let me tell you a couple of things that I observed in various visits to UK.
In an area named Small Heath, I was once staying with a British Pakistani family friends.
I noticed that the dad had a small job at Land Rover or something. The son (young healthy and married with one kid) did not work. His mother and his wife were a home-makers (did not work). They had three cars and lived in a medium size house.
During our conversations, I asked his son, how do you guys make the ends meet with one small job? It's very hard to do so in USA.
He laughed and said, the govt takes care of us.
While driving through the area during daytime, he made several stops to say hello Hi to his friends who were just strolling and wandering off the streets or were in their homes.
So I asked him, these guys don't have a job or go to college or something? He laughed again, and said, the govt takes care of them.
And then he drove-by a small street and proudly said with a chest thumping tone, "ALL houses in this street are owned by Pakistanis."
I looked at the street and it was absolutely loaded with trash. He noticed my scolding and had a guilty conscious type of laugh and said, these guys don't put their trash in the crash cans - so garbage trucks have stopped entering into this street.
Also met an Afghani acquaintance.
This guy lived in a small apartment and had 5 or six kids with no job. The answer was the same, govt pays more if you have more kids.
While these guys schemed to suck on welfare, I was left shocked and ashamed.
I mean, I could go on with a few more potent examples but let's say, I am just looking at the glass being half full.
I could give you real life examples of white people I grew up with, from lower echelons to the highest. Some pretty disturbing stuff would surface, sadly most of it wouldn't pass the censorship rules on family websites such as this one. Why do you have this racist concept that only Pakistanis or their descendants are accountable?
I think the OP came up with an astonishing number of a certain group that is 50% below the poverty line.
Whether it's true and accurate or not is not the question - but if we compare this certain group with any other group, then the common ground should be around 50% under the poverty line.
The so called "Whites" you talk about, are they also under 50% poverty line? If yes, we have a valid argument.
Because my stance is, if a certain group is 3rd and 4th generation British and 50% of its chunk is still under the poverty line, then we need to find the reason.
Is there anything in the British law that is biased towards this certain group, or the inability to positively grow is the lifestyle of this particular group?
If this is true that welfare pays the same as the type of jobs they qualify for, then it makes sense to just take welfare right? Why work then? Hate the game not the player.
I don't have any "Love" for such players either.
Third and fourth generation immigrants, and still being mentally stuck in the third world.
Not smearing 'em all with one brush stroke, but seriously, I get disappointed when I see many of them of jobless loafers and unskilled labor.
If you are unable to merge and take benefit from the open playgrounds of the first world, perhaps you should move back to where your mindset belongs?