What's new

Hardik Pandya vs Bilawal Bhatti

Finisher

Finisher

Local Club Star
Joined
Oct 6, 2015
Runs
1,731
Bhatti can bowl fast as seen in S.A where he was clocking near to 150kph.

Hardik was clocking around 143-145 in Bangladesh, he's had a good start to his career like bhatti.

:bhatti is out of the team because he couldn't stop bowling short and wide and hardik has bowled short over 90% off his deliveries in this ongoing wt20.

Hardik was being hyped as having the ability to become the best allrounder in the world. Do Indian fans still believe he has what it takes to do just that because he looks just like another bhatti to me.
 
Pandya has better batting ability but he is a garbage bowler. Bhatti can crank it up to 150kph consistently but he is quite garbage too.

Both are unfortunate 'all-rounders'.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
 
Pandya can hit big but not so good bowler.

Bhatti can bowl at pace but way expensive.
 
Pandya is a very capable batsman.A big hitter.

And his bowling will come handy on non subcontinental pitches.He is the fast bowling all rounder that we lacked in non subcontinental pitches.
 
Pandya is future Indian Razzaq.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
 
This is actually a decent comparison. Both are quick bowlers who tend spray it around a bit. They can also strike the ball big. I think Pandya is the better batsman, and Bilawal is the better bowler. But the batting situations that both come into are different - Pandya is usually in to end off a good innings by the Indian batsmen, while Bhatti will usually come in during a collapse, trying to salvage the innings and post some sort of respectable total.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Pandya is a very capable batsman.A big hitter.

And his bowling will come handy on non subcontinental pitches.He is the fast bowling all rounder that we lacked in non subcontinental pitches.
Click to expand...

If his bowling will come handy on non subcontinental pitches then why was he playing in WCT20 and before in Asia cup?
 
Finisher said:
Bhatti can bowl fast as seen in S.A where he was clocking near to 150kph.

Hardik was clocking around 143-145 in Bangladesh, he's had a good start to his career like bhatti.

:bhatti is out of the team because he couldn't stop bowling short and wide and hardik has bowled short over 90% off his deliveries in this ongoing wt20.

Hardik was being hyped as having the ability to become the best allrounder in the world. Do Indian fans still believe he has what it takes to do just that because he looks just like another bhatti to me.
Click to expand...

Bhatti > Pandya
 
Pandya is a batsman and apart time bowler. He's not really up to the mark with his bowling. Lots of work to be done.
 
Pandya is clearly a better batsmen

Bhatti can crank it up but other then that there both mediocre bowlers
 
Last edited:
Pandya : mediocre bowler who can bowl 1 good over out of 4 & mediocre batsman who can hit a 6 get out on the next ball ala Afridi.

Bilawal Bhatti : Mediocre bowler who can bowl yorkers at good pace but mentally very weak & doesn't have the physic of a fast bowler. He can barely hold the bat.

Both are mediocre, but Pandya is better.
 
They're both the very definition of no-rounders. Not good enough with bat or ball.
 
Bhatti can bowl quicker but his control makes PAndya look Mcgrath

Bhatti is just a handy tailender, Pandya is a genuine talent with bat
 
Bhatti has pace, is almost a couple of yards quicker that Pandya. I've not really seen Pandya bowl that much but what I've seen of him against Pakistan I can safely say that Billawal is the better bowler, even with his spray gun technique I would back him in a bowling shootout against Pandya.

As far as batting is concerned Bilawal has winning contributions with the bat against a rampaging SA attack in SA. This included bowlers like Styen, Morkel and Phillander who were taken to task by Anwar Ali and Bhatti of all people :)). When Pandya scores against an ATG attack in their back yard and then he surely would have surpassed Bhatti - The batsmen.

Until then Bhatti > Pandya (Both Batting and Bowling)
 
Pandya is 10x the fielder and 3x the batsman

Bowling wise both get phaintees but Pandya is more likely to get wickets
 
tariqkamal said:
Can you please give an example where Pandya has batted so well.
Click to expand...

Hasnt batted well in Internationals so far, but has shown glimpses of power hitting ability

He has way more potential as batter than bhatti
 
We have full faith in pandya, no body expects pandya to bowl great overs on flat pattas, he's in the team due to his hitting ability, his fielding is great too and his bowling is a bonus, his bowling will be handy in good bowling conditions, his batting will be handy in good batting conditions, thus good prospect for Indian cricket
 
Bhatti is a better bowler than pandya and batting wise both are almost equal. Bhatti can be a good prospect in test cricket where he can be utilised as proper allrounder.
 
Bhatti is more talented all-rounder given more chances he ll come good still remember his spell vs Sri Lanka in tes which was really good and his match winning partnership in south Africa he bat well in pressure situation also won match in last over in t20 i think against Zimbabwe but pandaya is more confident and blessed to be part of one of greatest indian team and he was handled by an indian legend captain he ll come good just like in 90 razzaq and mahmood were blessed to be part of one of greatest pakistani team which boosted their confidence and look where they are now
 
Bhatti is a pretty interesting T20 player as he can hit the ball a long way and bowls a heavy ball.

Bhatti for sure is a better bowler, but Pandya is ahead batting wise.
 
I thin injuries took toll on bhatti otherwise he is way batter bowler then pandya but pandya is a batter batsman
 
Greenstorm said:
Bhatti is a better bowler than pandya and batting wise both are almost equal. Bhatti can be a good prospect in test cricket where he can be utilised as proper allrounder.
Click to expand...

This shows how much of a blunder the selection committee had made in Feb. Bhatti with his pace and varations would have done a lot better than the current old pacers. Not to forget he is a very handy hitter.

Guys like Bhatti, Nauman will only get their chances once we start picking T20 specialists.
 
Finisher said:
Bhatti can bowl fast as seen in S.A where he was clocking near to 150kph.

Hardik was clocking around 143-145 in Bangladesh, he's had a good start to his career like bhatti.

:bhatti is out of the team because he couldn't stop bowling short and wide and hardik has bowled short over 90% off his deliveries in this ongoing wt20.

Hardik was being hyped as having the ability to become the best allrounder in the world. Do Indian fans still believe he has what it takes to do just that because he looks just like another bhatti to me.
Click to expand...


He's out of the team because captain Afridi favoured his boy Anwar Ali
 
Pandya back to bowling like Bhatti again

5 overs for 47.

Kholi looks like he's losing confidence in Pandya's bowling.
 
Bhatti is the better bowler, Pandya the better batsman.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Andrew Symonds vs Hardik Pandya - Who has made a bigger impression in cricket?
Replies
2
Views
163
sweep_shot
sweep_shot
Cricket Warrior
Was it the right decision to appoint Hardik Pandya as the captain of Mumbai Indians?
2
Replies
108
Views
4K
hassan918
hassan918
FearlessRoar
[VIDEO] ICC launches the official promo for the Champions Trophy 2025, featuring stars like Shaheen Shah Afridi, Shadab Khan and Hardik Pandya
Replies
24
Views
1K
RedwoodOriginal
RedwoodOriginal
The Bald Eagle
[PICTURES/VIDEOS] Is Hardik Pandya, the Mr. Special in team India?
2 3
Replies
222
Views
10K
The Bald Eagle
The Bald Eagle
R
Does Hardik Pandya have a bigger impact against Pakistan compared to Virat Kohli?
Replies
11
Views
1K
kron
K
Back
Top