What's new

Harry Brook handed Two-Year IPL Ban for last-minute withdrawal to focus on International Cricket

After Ben buckett pulls out of ipl, there was an interesting analysis in sports today.it says Hales, Jason Roy, Gus attkinson, Brooks , Duckett every one pulled out on personal grounds after securing a near base price contract. Roy and Attkinson did it twice.overall its 8 players in 4 years. Franchises may be forced to keep away from the eng players especially at base price level ones.
 
After Ben buckett pulls out of ipl, there was an interesting analysis in sports today.it says Hales, Jason Roy, Gus attkinson, Brooks , Duckett every one pulled out on personal grounds after securing a near base price contract. Roy and Attkinson did it twice.overall its 8 players in 4 years. Franchises may be forced to keep away from the eng players especially at base price level ones.
Not sure about Duckett, but it just might be a smart play by Brooks, in hindsight. After his 2 year ban, he’ll get several times more money than his base price in the IPL and he deserves to given his performances of late.
 
After Ben buckett pulls out of ipl, there was an interesting analysis in sports today.it says Hales, Jason Roy, Gus attkinson, Brooks , Duckett every one pulled out on personal grounds after securing a near base price contract. Roy and Attkinson did it twice.overall its 8 players in 4 years. Franchises may be forced to keep away from the eng players especially at base price level ones.
I think Brook's case is different from other players. He was likely to become the England's captain and that was the most likely reason for him to pull back unlike the other players you mentioned in your comment.
 
Not sure about Duckett, but it just might be a smart play by Brooks, in hindsight. After his 2 year ban, he’ll get several times more money than his base price in the IPL and he deserves to given his performances of late.
He never performed anything in india. So he may get a chance later but it will be the deal breaker for him.
 
I think Brook's case is different from other players. He was likely to become the England's captain and that was the most likely reason for him to pull back unlike the other players you mentioned in your comment.
Brooks is an egoistic. He had scored a century after multiple failures(7/8 games at every position)in his maiden ipl stint.He went after the franchise fines for making fun of his price tag (16 crores)till then.Again after that century, he went out missing and ended up 8 or 9 avg for the season.Srh released him but he was brought at 20 percent of his initial stint price.There after he has never shown interest in ipl.unless he got a guaranteed a 15 crore tag again, i dont think he will play in ipl.
 
He never performed anything in india. So he may get a chance later but it will be the deal breaker for him.
He’s young but still prodigiously talented. I’m pretty sure he’ll light up the IPL at some point - he’s way too talented not to.
 
IPL doesn't need Brook, but Brook needed IPL to perform well in the recent World T20, where he failed except for an unexpected innings against Pakistan.

:kp
From what I recall Brook failed miserably in the IPL except for an unexpected innings where he scored a hundred

Didn;t have any impact on his international performance. He only got better.

Cope harder
 
From what I recall Brook failed miserably in the IPL except for an unexpected innings where he scored a hundred

Didn;t have any impact on his international performance. He only got better.

Cope harder
That's why zero Ashes and india - England test series win at home or Away.

He only can win something against Minnow Pakistan.

:klopp :kp
 
He’s young but still prodigiously talented. I’m pretty sure he’ll light up the IPL at some point - he’s way too talented not to.
I think he will play Ipl only after he is successful in a test series in india.Before that he wont commend a good price by franchises and he wont mind to sit out untill he gets a hefty tag.
 
Back
Top