Funny, so I don't look at the last two years, which I admit my mistake, which I usually do (I also did after I posted) admit my mistake and say yes I was wrong, and now it becomes a question of my understanding of cricket.
Just like you cannot understand what anyone posts and make up arguments they never made to seem right.
Chalaak admi ho tum, except we're not all fools that fall into your trap.
I do enjoy however how the statistical analysis which you were arguing the other day isn't important is what you use now to talk to me, but then the other day you said for you it doesn't.
Why would someone, even if the other is wrong discuss stats and try to use them as though it is an argument they understand and agree with. You cannot have it both ways.
Either you support stats and that's your way to prove a Rahim is good, which admittedly fair play, has improved immensely in the last couple years, or you don't, and trying to argue context of them makes little to no sense.
You don't have to respond. Won't indulge in your nonsense anymore.
Wish I could block people's posts so I wouldn't have to see self indulgent posters around here who don't want to discuss cricket for fun and enjoy, but simply want to be right and could care less whether their team does well or not.
) 
