Probably Saim Ayub at some point, once he gets his game in order.
Saim Ayub must be compared to Jaiswal. Not Gill. Shubman is in a different league altogether.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably Saim Ayub at some point, once he gets his game in order.
And to think Haider Ali was supposed to be a Shubman Gill equivalent from Pakistan!
Gill even in the under-19 batch he played stood well above everyone else. Infact still considered the best under-19 find ever that including Kohli, Rohit, Dhawan, Yuvraj.
On one hand, Indian T20 batting force looks scary
You’ve got
Rohit
Kohli
Gill
SRK
Pandya and whatnot
But then, they are mostly tigers at home and scary cats abroad.
There is also a trend of falling with the same speed with which they rose up.
Gill seems like a classy batsman who is in good form - how long this form lasts and how he performs abroad, should give us a better idea.
For now, yes indeed he looks very classy and easy on the eyes. Great technique and talent seems to be evident. All the best to him.
Second most talented Indian batsmen I've seen in my lifetime.Shubhman Gill is destined to be among the 100 greatest batsman of all-time.
Where do you think he'll finish in terms of India's greatest?He is comfortably better than Babar and it is delusional to argue otherwise. He is extraordinary.
Second most talented Indian batsmen I've seen in my lifetime.
He has more gears than Kohli and if he lives up to his potential he should end up as India's second greatest batsmen.
We need to see him more at International level , talented no doubt , he is not using force , its very graceful. But India had other very promising youngsters who faded away.
Shubhman Gill is destined to be among the 100 greatest batsman of all-time.
We need to see him more at International level , talented no doubt , he is not using force , its very graceful. But India had other very promising youngsters who faded away.
Which ones faded away?
Any player that has work ethic is destined to be succesful. He has incredible work ethic like Kohli. His father has molded him nicely from a very young age. Talent becomes waste when there is no work ethic.
We will see , its too early to compare him with Kohli , Kohli has a big legacy behind him .
He needs to keep developing himself. Like he developed his power game.
Second most talented Indian batsmen I've seen in my lifetime.
He has more gears than Kohli and if he lives up to his potential he should end up as India's second greatest batsmen.
Which ones faded away?
I agree he is more talented than Kohli but ultimately it is just the start of his career and hence a long way to go to even predict how far he can go.
Among the most hyped ones, KL Rahul and Shaw.
Where do you think he'll finish in terms of India's greatest?
Ofcourse that stands true as far as achieving greatness is concerned.
KL
Rahane
Both lost their test match technique when they improved their T20 power game.
The best test batters in the world, Smith Labuschagne Williamson Root, aren't v good in T20Is.
Only exception is Kohli. Kohli though has a power game, never became a six hitter. But is a boundary hitter.
ABD is an exception too, probably due to being a freakish player. 50 averaging test batsman and a high strike rate LOI player capable of hitting bowlers in death overs. Similarly, Pietersen had similar game.
KL also has power game, maybe he does well at #5 in Tests but he is simply not hitting any purple patch let alone a peak.
KL is done. 49 tests. Batting avg 34.
He should not be near the Indian team...He is being selected because his Father in law runs a PR for him and he is the coach's blue eyed boy.
bro wat lol. This is a Gambhir move obviously. To try and make Bazball play out of their comfort zone going for a draw.Will be remembered as selfish as Babar if he continues this way.
How is he selfish. He made 161 in 162 balls. Declaration was purely done by Gambhir and co.Will be remembered as selfish as Babar if he continues this way.
India produces raw talent in batting and Pakistan produces raw talent in fast bowling. The only difference is India manages and nurtures the talents well where as Pakistan mismanages them.Don’t know about the future but currently no Pakistani batsmen is close to him.
After Tendulkar, Viru, VVS you got Dhoni, Kohli and Rohit, and now you have Gill, Pant etc, and I am sure there will come better players after these also. Just look at the young lad destroying England u19. Plenty of batting talent in India.
View attachment 155870
Super flat track and not a good bowling attack - Gill has 585 runs in 2 tests.
Around 200 more runs in 3 tests and he can be the highest run getter in away series among all Asian batsmen.
839 is Third highest score in a series , this can be break by gill.He has a realistic chance of breaking into Top 5 highest run getters all time in a test series
Don't look much into this hundreds, this is literally one of worse England attack I have ever seen in test cricket on flattest deck in history of England.....he will flop as usual in South africa and new zealand swinging conditions...
Agree.
This doesn't tell much. He faced rookie bowlers on very flat pitches.![]()
Gill played under-19 in 2018. Look where he is now. Even after 15 years Shanto will be like 20 levels below Gill.Shanto is better
It was not an amateur era. How do you know? Did you live through that era? What is with this rubbish assumption.839 is Third highest score in a series , this can be break by gill.
Bradman - 974
Hammond - 904
Tayler - 839
First two was in 1930 during the amateur era of cricket.
![]()
It’s a reasonable assumption to make. Most players played cricket not as a means to earn money- they were not employed by their cricket board but by other companies to earn their livelihood. You might want to be a little more open minded and leave some room for alternative arguments.It was not an amateur era. How do you know? Did you live through that era? What is with this rubbish assumption.
Bradman is the greatest of all time period. He is god everyone else is mortal
Problem is Brook and Root played the same pitch and weren’t great at their home.Don't look much into this hundreds, this is literally one of worse England attack I have ever seen in test cricket on flattest deck in history of England.....he will flop as usual in South africa and new zealand swinging conditions...
I am biggest shubnam fan but this is harsh truth and you will soon accept and acknowledge meProblem is Brook and Root played the same pitch and weren’t great at their home.
Lords was remotely a challenging pitch. His first innigns dismissals especially was a lapse in focus. He got disturbed by keeper standing up. Second innigns more due to pressure as India had to see off a session. He is better than that.As of now Shubhman has done well in this series especially in the first two matches.
The problem is that he still hasn't scored runs on challenging pitches, twin failures in third tests showed me that technically he hasn't improved and will need a lot more work.
He can bat under pressure and has the hunger for big runs, technically needs more time to improve.
It’s not luck. It’s cultivation of talent. We have had an extensive network of state team boards, lots of coaches and club houses. After some time you see the outcome.Man, India is blessed to have all these generational players. Gavaskar, Tendulkar, Kohli and now the Shubhman era.
There is a reason why pakistan fans are not exactly the best in assessing batting potential. He was spotted way back in 2018 under-19 world cup. Till date he is the best under-19 batsman India has ever produced. Most of the players come through ranks. They don't get picked because they hit a couple of sixes in CPL.Managed to capitalise on a flat wicket in England, without Broad and Jimmy.
He has a long way to go before he proves to be a MRF batsman.
BCCI were just gagging for one MRF sponsor after Kohli, they slapped the badge on the guy who has better stats.
This will not end well.