What's new

How Mickey Arthur’s ‘clear-the-air’ meeting sparked Pakistan's Champions Trophy revival

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,980
From losing to India in the opener to beating them comprehensively in the final, Pakistan’s changed approach was the difference, writes Saj for Scroll.in


61047-ustmazgoqx-1497945874.jpg


London: As the dust settles on a remarkable Champions Trophy tournament, Pakistani cricket followers around the globe will be scratching their heads and trying to work out whether the events of the last few days were indeed a dream.

To not only have lifted the Champions Trophy in front of a packed house at The Oval, but to have done it in such style against a team who had embarrassed Pakistan at the start of a tournament, is both a major achievement and a huge shock in the sporting world. Everyone loves an underdog, but this underdog was supposed to turn up at the Champions Trophy and be on the first flight home to Karachi and Lahore after the conclusion of the group stages. India and South Africa will qualify from the group and Sri Lanka and Pakistan will fight it out to avoid the wooden spoon said the cricketing community. But they forgot to factor in that in Pakistan cricket, as we have seen over the years, anything and everything is possible.

It’s impossible to pinpoint one specific moment as the turning point for Pakistan, but when adversity strikes, heroes are born. Sometimes a team learns more about themselves from a defeat than they do from a win. That shocking loss to India in Birmingham was exactly the wake-up call that the Pakistan team needed. It was exactly what they required to kick-start the tournament for themselves. They were hurting after such a loss as ex-players bashed them, television channels mocked them, fans berated them and there were requests to investigate the humiliating loss. Pakistan was in cricketing turmoil and the Pakistani cricket followers were not happy. Something needed to be done, but most expected more embarrassment and defeats in the rest of the tournament.

In Pakistani cricketing circles, the team is at its best when they adopt an aggressive, must-win and attacking mindset. After the loss to India, every match was a cup final for Pakistan which is exactly the scenario which Pakistan teams have thrived on in the past.

A different ‘clear-the-air’ meeting

The entire squad sat down after the group stage match against India and had a “clear-the-air” meeting. In the past, such a meeting would have only involved senior players and management, but this time it was different. With the highly-respected Mickey Arthur in charge, he wanted an atmosphere of trust and openness where all players were given the opportunity to voice their concerns, provide feedback, and mention ideas to the rest of the touring party.

It was a meeting that ultimately changed the script for Pakistan. It was a meeting that brought about a the winning attitude in Pakistan. And it was a meeting that altered the course of the Champions Trophy. The frank discussions centred around a change in approach, a change in mindset and allowed for some innovative thoughts to be shared that revitalised Pakistan. Specifics like the strike-rate of the Pakistan batsmen, the approach from the top order, tactics adopted, and the attitude needed to win a tournament such as the Champions Trophy were all on the agenda.

After the all-important meeting, Pakistan never looked back. Admittedly some personnel changes made a lot of difference with the struggling Ahmed Shehzad left out and the out-of-form Wahab Riaz sidelined though injury. Fakhar Zaman came into the team and provided Pakistan with the right type of impetus at the top of the order. He allowed for other batsmen such as Azhar Ali, Babar Azam and Mohammad Hafeez to bat around him. The much-criticised Junaid Khan came into the starting XI and looked like a bowler who was desperate to grab this chance he had craved for. Junaid was a man on a mission and his aggressive approach was exactly what the Pakistan bowling unit needed.

A different Pakistan approach

With nothing to lose, Pakistan built momentum and formulated a game-plan that was ideal for their brand of cricket and for the type of players at their disposal. Gone was the 90s style batting approach; instead with Fakhar Zaman at the top of the order, the batsmen were looking to put the bowlers under pressure and not the other way around as has been so common with Pakistan ODI teams of late. The batsmen showed urgency, they looked to rotate the strike, and they looked to play the big shots that they were so reluctant to do in recent times.

Pakistani bowling attacks have always been at their best when they look to attack and take wickets. It is a philosophy that has served Pakistan cricket so well, working wonders for the World Cup winning team of 1992, under the leadership of Imran Khan. As Wasim Akram once stated, “we were just told to attack and forget about the runs we conceded.”

This was the mindset that Hasan Ali, Mohammad Amir and Junaid Khan adopted, which suited their brand of bowling – look to take early wickets, attack in the middle overs and have the opposition on the ropes. It wasn’t rocket-science, but it was an approach that had somehow been forgotten by recent Pakistan ODI captains.

As the senior players found their form, the younger players came to the fore. Hasan Ali, Shadab Khan and Fakhar Zaman weren’t names familiar to many outside Pakistan but in the space of a week they became known throughout the world of cricket. Their fearless approach won them huge praise from many and their futures look bright, if managed properly.

The manner of the wins against England and India proved that this was not a lucky coincidence, but a well-deserved victory, one that came with a lot of hard work and team spirit. It was a win constructed through meticulous planning, a change in mindset regarding professionalism, and a win that was largely down to the no-nonsense approach of the Head Coach Mickey Arthur.

Pakistan cricket has not had much to smile about in recent times, but on a beautiful day in London it was smiling once again. It was also a stark reminder to the cricketing world and experts to never write off the Pakistan cricket team.

The underdogs came, the underdogs won and the underdogs left us with many great memories.

https://thefield.scroll.in/841160/h...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
 
Last edited:
Imagine Waqar in that situation. He would have further demoralized the team as evidenced by his captaincy and coaching. An absolute downer.
 
I have my doubts, reading the article, it just looks like Micky locked them all in a room, flipped open his laptop and spent the afternoon showing the squad PP threads.
 
Mickey/Sarfraz/Azhar much much better than Waqar/Misbah... PCB should look to hire Wasim Akram as co-coach along with Azhar Mahmoud... both would be a great combo for the team... Spin bowling coach could be Abdur Rahman for Yasir, Shadab, Imad, Fakhar, Azhar, Harris, Shoaib, Hafeez..
 
I have my doubts, reading the article, it just looks like Micky locked them all in a room, flipped open his laptop and spent the afternoon showing the squad PP threads.

And what's wrong with that?

Seriously speaking, would have been a depressing atmosphere but kudos to Mickey for helping them see the light
 
What I've noticed (and like) about Mickey is that he focuses on process. He talks about the match against india as an aberration in contrast to the preparation of the team. He doesn't get in to assessing win loss basis talent in isolation. He talks about fitness, training, hardwork as the pathways to success.
Frankly it does sound a lot better than the nonsense that some our experts put out on tv: "played without fear, played with aggression, attacking mindset etc etc"
All of these things maybe true but they are the outcome of training for success, and not just a switch you turn on.
I think most experts are genuinely struggling to figure out how Pakistan won. If you say its the same old unpredictable Pakistan - that does not explain how we have defeated 4 teams on a roll - dismissing each for under 250. At the same time, its difficult to blv anyone who says "I saw this coming" considering how poor pakistan have been for the last couple of years.
 
One of the best things that he did was to sent Umar Akmal packing home after he failed the test.Great testiment to the fact that he believes in his priorities and not letting anyone off the hook.He is a professional who knows the processes more than anything and doesn't believe in "dilare say khelo" and all that.

All the best for the future,Mickey.
 
One of the best things that he did was to sent Umar Akmal packing home after he failed the test.Great testiment to the fact that he believes in his priorities and not letting anyone off the hook.He is a professional who knows the processes more than anything and doesn't believe in "dilare say khelo" and all that.

All the best for the future,Mickey.

Exactly right. People were didn't understand the value of fitness and the wrong message it sends to the squad. That was a very important decision. I hope people who were commenting on the "Is fitness important" thread and saying fitness is overrated in cricket have a better understanding of the issue, and how fitness DIRECTLY relates to professionalism in sport.
 
It's easy for me to say this now but when I met Mickey Arthur ahead of the tournament he had a steely determination about him. It was a few days after Umar Akmal had been booted out and sent home.

Mickey was relaxed yet determined. He wasn't overconfident but realistic.

He chatted with me for over an hour after the interview and the words that he said really made me sit up and take note. One of the things he said to me was very interesting "I'm not here to just make money, I am here to make these cricketers better and more professional players."

The words professional and fitness were mentioned lots of times by Mickey and he made no excuses for mentioning those words again and again.
 
It's easy for me to say this now but when I met Mickey Arthur ahead of the tournament he had a steely determination about him. It was a few days after Umar Akmal had been booted out and sent home.

Mickey was relaxed yet determined. He wasn't overconfident but realistic.

He chatted with me for over an hour after the interview and the words that he said really made me sit up and take note. One of the things he said to me was very interesting "I'm not here to just make money, I am here to make these cricketers better and more professional players."

The words professional and fitness were mentioned lots of times by Mickey and he made no excuses for mentioning those words again and again.

We are already seeing the difference between him and the previous foreign coaches who came to Pakistan i.e. Dav Whatmore, Geoff Lawson and Bob Woolmer.

Woolmer had his own style but i suspect he made compromises along the way with the PCB and the captains and senior players.

Arthur on the other hand looks absolutely determined to professionalize and revolutionize Pakistani Cricket, clearly he is not doing it for the paycheque solely, the good thing is he is not going to accept any pressure from external stakeholders but at the same time he has drawn lessons from the Greg Chappell experience in India and is not going to anatognize the entire squad either. So far i can see he his doing his best to balance the professional best practices and keeping the senior players in the squad on board like Azhar, Malik, Hafeez e.t.c.
 
What I've noticed (and like) about Mickey is that he focuses on process. He talks about the match against india as an aberration in contrast to the preparation of the team. He doesn't get in to assessing win loss basis talent in isolation. He talks about fitness, training, hardwork as the pathways to success.
Frankly it does sound a lot better than the nonsense that some our experts put out on tv: "played without fear, played with aggression, attacking mindset etc etc"

All of these things maybe true but they are the outcome of training for success, and not just a switch you turn on.
I think most experts are genuinely struggling to figure out how Pakistan won. If you say its the same old unpredictable Pakistan - that does not explain how we have defeated 4 teams on a roll - dismissing each for under 250. At the same time, its difficult to blv anyone who says "I saw this coming" considering how poor pakistan have been for the last couple of years.

That was the key, process and planning. I am most impressed by our bowling plans and preparation. We bowled the best length for each power play, Amir and Junaid upfront never gave any width, they were neither too full or too short upfront. Pakistan new ball is going to reverse most at around 30 mark, those spells from 30-35 killed most teams...And then in last 10, we probably bowled most yorkers, I have seen in last 4/5 years and every bowler was doing it, even the new comer (Raees) was up well aware of those plans and did exactly that...There was consistency and method to bowling, it was anything but unpredictable ;-)
 
Funny quote by Mickey at the press conference was that he reached 5 semi-finals with South Africa and he won nothing. First time with Pakistan, he wins the Champions Trophy.
 

Just compare the temprament of Waqar vs Arthur. Just compare the stark contrast with which the two coaches handled the situation and their respective teams when faced with a knock out scenario. Remember that Pakistan still had a chance to qualify for the SF in their final match against Australia but Waqar chose to demoralize and let his frustrations out against the team as coach. Very reminiscent of his captaincy in 2003.

History will record and remember that one coach was an absolute downer to his team while another coach fully motivated his team to 4 straight victories in a row against the top ranked teams.
 
Last edited:
Arthur is somewhere more determined to prove his credebility as a coach as well especially after getting kicked out by CA. And boy oh boy he has achieved some of it he would bea proud man now. But please keep working hard and make the boys work hard and make sure to reach the finals of world t20 and world cup 2019.
I always trusted him and he has delivered. [MENTION=9]Saj[/MENTION] please interview tanvir ahmed now i saw him lambasting arthur after the first game against India and also after UA was send back. Havent seen him after CT final. please would like to know his views now.
 
Arthur is somewhere more determined to prove his credebility as a coach as well especially after getting kicked out by CA. And boy oh boy he has achieved some of it he would bea proud man now. But please keep working hard and make the boys work hard and make sure to reach the finals of world t20 and world cup 2019.
I always trusted him and he has delivered. [MENTION=9]Saj[/MENTION] please interview tanvir ahmed now i saw him lambasting arthur after the first game against India and also after UA was send back. Havent seen him after CT final. please would like to know his views now.

Why would give some quick fame to a nothing cricketer like Tanvir Ahmad?He needs to be left to the sun and let him be there.He is one of the most cringeworthy individuals you will see on the Paliatan TV.By his comments you could sense that he was a legendary cricketer but we all know he was a nothing cricketer.He has never added anything as an "analyst" so I sometimes wonder why these channels keep inviting him?
 
Why would give some quick fame to a nothing cricketer like Tanvir Ahmad?He needs to be left to the sun and let him be there.He is one of the most cringeworthy individuals you will see on the Paliatan TV.By his comments you could sense that he was a legendary cricketer but we all know he was a nothing cricketer.He has never added anything as an "analyst" so I sometimes wonder why these channels keep inviting him?

Literally i want to see him with an emberraced face. the way he was shouting on TV spewing venom against arthur he ahould be held resposible for the ott statement he was making.
 
What impressed me the most was Mickey's policy of facing the music in front of the media himself after each loss, while allowing Sarfraz to face the media after each win.

That in itself is just brilliant, and it shows he is a fantastic coach who cares about his captain and his team.
 
Imagine Waqar in that situation. He would have further demoralized the team as evidenced by his captaincy and coaching. An absolute downer.

It was a blessing that waqar left. He is by far the worst coach in history for any International Cricket team. One of the worst Pakistan captain as well. Yes, he was a fantastic bowler, one of the legends. But that's where his contribution should've ended.
 
brilliant article which also compared the defensive mindset in captaincy since Younis Khan stepped down. Afridi and Misbah were defensive captains, especially Afridi who everyone had a lot of expectations. Glad its changing now. Still a long way to go
 

Just compare the temprament of Waqar vs Arthur. Just compare the stark contrast with which the two coaches handled the situation and their respective teams when faced with a knock out scenario. Remember that Pakistan still had a chance to qualify for the SF in their final match against Australia but Waqar chose to demoralize and let his frustrations out against the team as coach. Very reminiscent of his captaincy in 2003.

History will record and remember that one coach was an absolute downer to his team while another coach fully motivated his team to 4 straight victories in a row against the top ranked teams.

to be fair on Waqar. He had to deal with the likes of Shehzad, Akmals and he didn't have good bowlers like Hasan Ali, Junaid Khan and Amir
 
to be fair on Waqar. He had to deal with the likes of Shehzad, Akmals and he didn't have good bowlers like Hasan Ali, Junaid Khan and Amir

Mickey also had to deal with Shehzad, and benched him after the first CT match. Waqar had Ajmal, one of the great ODI bowlers of all time. To be fair, Waqar's biggest problem was Waqar
 
Mickey also had to deal with Shehzad, and benched him after the first CT match. Waqar had Ajmal, one of the great ODI bowlers of all time. To be fair, Waqar's biggest problem was Waqar

Waqar also lost Ajmal prior to World Cup and Pakistan had decent spinner. Also the bowling attach he had in 2015 was the worst I have ever seen. Mickey didn't had to deal with Irfan, Rahat, Ehsan, Yasir (in ODIs) and Anwar Ali
 
Waqar also lost Ajmal prior to World Cup and Pakistan had decent spinner. Also the bowling attach he had in 2015 was the worst I have ever seen. Mickey didn't had to deal with Irfan, Rahat, Ehsan, Yasir (in ODIs) and Anwar Ali

I don't know what you mean by 'deal with'? Waqar wanted Rahat, he was Rahat's biggest fan and responsible for this strangely wilting vegetable getting so many chances. Waqar's eye for bowlers was surprisingly bad.
 
Back
Top