Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haris sohail majorily and Rizwan also cost pakistan match
Pakistan were 218/2 after 41 overs
Pakistan finished on 271/8 after 50 overs
Pakistan scored 53/6 from the last 9 overs
How on earth did they lose the game?
When your end goal is to occupy the crease and confirm your spot that's how you lose.
When your goal is to score runs, play shots and get a win for the team then you win.
It's easy if you can see: When players play for personal milestones, teams lose. That's the reason I used to criticize Misbah too. Rizwan could have scored big shots instead of taking singles in the 90s but he was too much focussed on increasing one hundred against australia. He celebrated it too, like winning isn't something he had on his mind first.
Hussain Talat is another such from this lot. This behavior was also visible in Test series, when Pakistani players scored 40-50 for their place in team, instead of batting with patience and effort to bat long.
Pakistan were still cruising. Infact we require 58 in last 9 overs with 8 wickets in hand.
Haris played bad as does Shan but cant say he was selfish.
There was only 1 player who was selfish. Hint: he was celebrating his century as if he he won the match.
When your end goal is to occupy the crease and confirm your spot that's how you lose.
When your goal is to score runs, play shots and get a win for the team then you win.
I don't agree with blaming Rizwan. From 80-90, he took 11 balls. From 90-100, he took 7 balls.
He was trying to play percentage shots to get the runs which was the right approach. If the others played their part, we would've won. He doesn't have the game to hit big shots, hitting big shots means he would've thrown his wicket away, and Yasir was at #8 today.
I also don't think he celebrated his hundred that exuberantly. Just waved his bat to acknowledge the applause, no taking off the helmet, jumping around or sajda. He knew there was a match to be won.
Thing is if he had closed the match for Pakistan even without the century, people would be heralding him even more. It's been pretty rare that someone's scored a large score down the order at a good SR to clinch the match. Especially when he came in, Pakistan were batting slow.
Why I'm not convinced he was being selfish. It was just typical Pakistan batting plan, the guy who's in on a high score focus on staying in, guys new to the crease hit out and get the score. It didn't work, so we lost.
I don't agree with blaming Rizwan. From 80-90, he took 11 balls. From 90-100, he took 7 balls.
He was trying to play percentage shots to get the runs which was the right approach. If the others played their part, we would've won. He doesn't have the game to hit big shots, hitting big shots means he would've thrown his wicket away, and Yasir was at #8 today.
I also don't think he celebrated his hundred that exuberantly. Just waved his bat to acknowledge the applause, no taking off the helmet, jumping around or sajda. He knew there was a match to be won.
Apart from Umar Akmal, who has the six hitting shots. Mickey Arthur talks a good talk about playing an aggressive modern brand of cricket but why is the team filled with accumulators 80-90% of the times?
Mickey just talks
I don't agree with blaming Rizwan. From 80-90, he took 11 balls. From 90-100, he took 7 balls.
He was trying to play percentage shots to get the runs which was the right approach. If the others played their part, we would've won. He doesn't have the game to hit big shots, hitting big shots means he would've thrown his wicket away, and Yasir was at #8 today.
I also don't think he celebrated his hundred that exuberantly. Just waved his bat to acknowledge the applause, no taking off the helmet, jumping around or sajda. He knew there was a match to be won.
Apart from Umar Akmal, who has the six hitting shots. Mickey Arthur talks a good talk about playing an aggressive modern brand of cricket but why is the team filled with accumulators 80-90% of the times?
Mickey just talks
Umar Akmal, Asif ali Sohaib type of players all belong to same category brainless sloggers they can on the day can score 60-70 fast runs but most of the time they will fail. Look at how Maxwell slogged calculated slogs keeping in mind where the 5 fielders are in boundary so even miss hit can go to vacant areas.Apart from Umar Akmal, who has the six hitting shots. Mickey Arthur talks a good talk about playing an aggressive modern brand of cricket but why is the team filled with accumulators 80-90% of the times?
Mickey just talks
Umar Akmal, Asif ali Sohaib type of players all belong to same category brainless sloggers they can on the day can score 60-70 fast runs but most of the time they will fail. Look at how Maxwell slogged calculated slogs keeping in mind where the 5 fielders are in boundary so even miss hit can go to vacant areas.
We’re basically mental midgets chasing anything against anyone. I can’t believe we ended up panicking and throwing away wickets when in cruise control. Well, actually I can believe it.
With enough determination and resilience you can achieve anything and we are obviously the most determined and resilient nation.
Pakistan have lacked a lower order finisher since Abdul Razzaq and even he was hit and miss.
We've lost many chases like this in recent years - we need someone who can strike the ball from the off and hit a winning 40 from 30.
Umar Akmal doesn't have the brain for it. Asif Ali cannot seem to concentrate for long enough. Faheem and Shadab are rubbish. Maybe Imad can do it but he failed today. I think our best option for the WC is Hafeez if he can swallow his ego and accept batting in lower order.
On this occasion, a finisher wasn’t even required just needed to keep going but the thought of winning the match made us self destruct. Abid Ali should have kept going instead of trying to hit the big shot.
Pakistan have lacked a lower order finisher since Abdul Razzaq and even he was hit and miss.
We've lost many chases like this in recent years - we need someone who can strike the ball from the off and hit a winning 40 from 30.
Umar Akmal doesn't have the brain for it. Asif Ali cannot seem to concentrate for long enough. Faheem and Shadab are rubbish. Maybe Imad can do it but he failed today. I think our best option for the WC is Hafeez if he can swallow his ego and accept batting in lower order.
We don't have the personnel. Asif Ali was tried but he didn't avail his chances.
Regardless, six hitting was not required here. The equation was 60 off 53 when Abid got out. Six hitters rarely work in UAE unless they have a well-rounded game, hitting from ball 1 is not easy. Even Maxwell has taken some time to get going.
Pakistan were 218/2 after 41 overs
Pakistan finished on 271/8 after 50 overs
Pakistan scored 53/6 from the last 9 overs
How on earth did they lose the game?
Pakistan have lacked a lower order finisher since Abdul Razzaq and even he was hit and miss.
We've lost many chases like this in recent years - we need someone who can strike the ball from the off and hit a winning 40 from 30.
Umar Akmal doesn't have the brain for it. Asif Ali cannot seem to concentrate for long enough. Faheem and Shadab are rubbish. Maybe Imad can do it but he failed today. I think our best option for the WC is Hafeez if he can swallow his ego and accept batting in lower order.
You can make your point without manufacturing lies.
Rizwan didn't celebrate his hundred exuberently as if he had won the match. He didn't take his helmet off and neither did he applaud the crowd (I mean the empty seats) properly. He only gave a brief signal to the dressing room and just raised his bat for a couple of seconds.
He should have done better in the last 5 overs, but he still scored his century at a 100+ SR. The real culprit was Haris who played a pathetic innings, and also Umar.
After Rizwan convincingly outperformed Sarfaraz, you have been forced to drive home the "but Rizwan is selfish and Sarfraz is selfless" narrative to deflect attention from the fact that he has done more in one series than Sarfaraz in two years.
You are better than a troll. Don't stoop to that level.
When can we find a batsmen from domestics who actually has won it for the team many times while chasing...Aka like a Kohli or at least a Razzaq?
I don't think we have such a batsmen as each one plays for his hundred and then gets out....
Ok, then whose bright idea was it to take the chase down to the last over, the likes of India and the Big 5 teams look to finish the game by the 48th over. Our players have simply not move on with the times.
I don't buy the excuse of not have personnel, you find them and fit them in the squad. Imad Wasim is certainly not that player. When you need 24 of 2 overs, you need to hit a few sixes to ease the pressure.
If it was only that easy to find a Kohli...
Btw thi is not the first instance where Rizwan has showed selfishness. The way he treated Saud Shakeel pathetically by bringing him up at 4 while Saad Ali and Saud batted at 6/7 showed some hint of selfish genes. Just so that he score some runs and get selected to the National side while poor Saud who was in great form had to bat in lower middle order.
Still i think he is not as bad as Shehzad when it comes to selfishness and hopefully will realize now that team comes first.
not sure who you talking about but my problem is with UA. For the longest time people are failed to see that its not only about getting ball on the bat, you need to construct an innings which UA can never do in a million years.
Seeing him from the day he debut, he should stop dreaming about playing for pakistan and play in those mickey mouse T20 cricket where he can slog n make an impact with his 20-30 and an occasional 50. Enough with the garbage our selectors and cricket experts keep forgetting how he bottled crucial games for pakistan
I will also like to add, had Pakistan been paying their full strength team they still would had lost.
The problem is obvious, we dont have a finisher or a proper striker at the lower order.
MIckey had the chance of trying Iftikhar Ahmed or giving Asif Ali a final chance.
Both are good finishers.
Instead they go for Umar Akmal giving him his 300th final chance.
Guys like Dhoni and Bevan would finish games like this in their sleep - 60 off 53 should be a doddle in this day and age.
Now I'm not saying we have a Dhoni or Bevan in our setup but we're desperately lacking a finisher who can hit 40 off 30 in these situations. Heck, even Mohammad Hafeez will suffice and he MUST bat at 6 in the World Cup.
I will also like to add, had Pakistan been paying their full strength team they still would had lost.
The problem is obvious, we dont have a finisher or a proper striker at the lower order.
MIckey had the chance of trying Iftikhar Ahmed or giving Asif Ali a final chance.
Both are good finishers.
Instead they go for Umar Akmal giving him his 300th final chance.
Hafeez is another mental midget, the only reason he scored in the CT final was primarily because we were batting first with platform laid. Hafeez is one of the first to fold under pressure.
Hafeez is another mental midget, the only reason he scored in the CT final was primarily because we were batting first with platform laid. Hafeez is one of the first to fold under pressure.
Hafeez is another mental midget, the only reason he scored in the CT final was primarily because we were batting first with platform laid. Hafeez is one of the first to fold under pressure.
I'm more angry with this loss than I was for any of the losses when the series was alive. How did we manage to lose after that partnership between Rizwan and Abid Ali.
Abid Ali played a rather irresponsible slog.
This is what seperates a good player from a great player. Great players finish the job.
He was finished at that point, clearly had no energy to continue.
You can make your point without manufacturing lies.
Rizwan didn't celebrate his hundred exuberently as if he had won the match. He didn't take his helmet off and neither did he applaud the crowd (I mean the empty seats) properly. He only gave a brief signal to the dressing room and just raised his bat for a couple of seconds.
He should have done better in the last 5 overs, but he still scored his century at a 100+ SR. The real culprit was Haris who played a pathetic innings, and also Umar.
After Rizwan convincingly outperformed Sarfaraz, you have been forced to drive home the "but Rizwan is selfish and Sarfraz is selfless" narrative to deflect attention from the fact that he has done more in one series than Sarfaraz in two years.
You are better than a troll. Don't stoop to that level.